NCLAT refuses to grant interim stay to DHFL resolution

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal refused to grant an interim stay in the resolution plan of Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Company for Dewan Housing Finance Corporation.

It has set the next date of hearing on September 15 on a plea by 63 Moons Technologies challenging the NCLT’s approval to the DHFL resolution.

“The NCLAT today clarified that any steps taken in the DHFL matter in furtherance of the resolution plan will be subject to the outcome of the 63 Moons appeal and has set September 15, 2021, as the date for final hearing on the matter. Therefore, at the moment, the NCLAT has not interfered at the interim stage,” 63 Moons Technologies said in a statement on Thursday.

63 Moons will decide on its future course of action after receiving a copy of the order passed by NCLAT, it further said.

NCD holders’ plight

63 Moons holds over ₹200 crore of NCDs of DHFL. It has challenged NCLT’s approval of the resolution plan whereby Piramal had ascribed ₹1 for the potential recovery of ₹45,000 crore of fraudulent transaction recoveries at the cost of DHFL’s creditors.

“This sum is the amount that Wadhawans’ and others siphoned away from DHFL by defrauding the creditors. This ₹45,000 crore should come to all the creditors including the NCD holders,” 63 Moons said.

DHFL’s debt resolution has faced multiple legal challenges since it was approved by the NCLT in favour of the Piramal group. Former promoters of DHFL have also filed a legal challenge in addition to some of the fixed deposit holders.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Videocon resolution may be back to square one after NCLAT stay, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After NCLAT stayed the order of the NCLT of Mumbai Bench, the process of Videocon Industries’s liquidation case may start all over again. Legal experts also believe that SBI-led creditors may not do anything but the bid winner Anil Agarwal’s Twin Star may appeal in Supreme Court against the NCLAT order.

“As of now, NCLAT has stayed the order. The creditors (appellant) were possibly challenging the entire bidding approved by NCLT on the grounds that some procedures might not have been followed, opinions not being considered. Now there are high chances that the entire process can restart,” said Vikas Tomar, Partner, Indian Law Partners.

There are 35 financial creditors of Videocon, of which 19 major creditors, including SBI, Union Bank, IDBI, Central Bank, BOB and ICICI Bank approved the resolution, which includes the 95.85% haircut. But three minority shareholders, Bank of Maharashtra, SIDBI and IFCI rejected the resolution on the ground of low resolution and filed an appeal in NCLAT.

Large versus Minority Creditors versus Bidder

The plea of minority shareholders is heard and the whole case will move in a direction to get more benefits for the financial creditors.

“Banks are normally prepared to take a 60-70 per cent haircut on payments if an insolvency process is initiated. The bid was also rejected on the grounds that they should be compensated upfront and in cash rather than through NCDs. Accepting this bid will just increase the banks’ losses, and now their only option is to call for bids from interested parties,” said Sonam Chandwani. Managing Partners, KS Legal and Associates.

The main ground of the minority shareholders was the low resolution amount.

“The large financial creditors like SBI and others may prefer to keep quiet and wait for the court to do its process. But there are high chances that Anil Agarwal’s Twin Star Technologies may appeal in Supreme Court against NCLAT order,” said a legal expert who did not want to be identified.

There were 11 bidders for Videocon but only three had bid for the whole Videocon’s group assets. The majority of them had bid for only a particular division of the company. Hence on one side, there is a big hope that minority shareholders will recover more, but on the other side there the whole process may take a long time.

The Videocon resolution case has been one of the most dramatic in the IBC process. Starting from Chanda Kochchar, former MD and CEO, ICICI Bank losing her job and facing trials with investigative agencies for irregularities in the giving loans to the group, to the fresh challenge to the resolution process, it has been a bumpy road.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

BOM, SIDBI and IFCI reject resolution, move NCLAT, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In an unusual move, lenders of Videocon Industries agreed to take the 95.85% haircut on the accounts. But not all. Out of the total 35 financial creditors, four have dissented and 12 have abstained from voting. The rest of the lenders voted for the resolution.

Out of four creditors who have decided to go against the resolution order of NCLT dated June 8, 2021, and appealed in the NCLAT, are bankers.

The dissenting financial creditors are Bank of Maharashtra, SIDBI and IFCI, while the other is ABG Shipyard, which holds O.024%.

The combined shareholding of the four dissenting creditors is around 4%.

“We are against the resolution because the quantum is very low. We do not believe that this is a fair valuation and hence we have appealed in the Appellate Tribunal,” said A S Rajeev, MD & CEO, Bank of Maharashtra.

Following are the percentage share of the creditors who rejected the Videocon Industries resolution plan:

Creditors Share Value
Bank of Maharashtra 1.97%
SIDBI 0.053%
IFCI 1.3%
ABG Shipyard Ltd 0.024%


Videocon valuation

The resolution team of the valuation experts concluded the total dues of Videocon Industries to Rs 4,069 crore. Whereas the liquidation value was Rs 2568.13 crore. The resolution plan of Twin Star Technologies, a company owned by the chairman of Vedanta Group Anil Agarwal, was approved against the actual dues of about Rs 71,000 crore.

“We should not only look at the balance-sheet value but think about the actual receivables as well,” added Rajiv.

Resolution process

There are many cases like Siva Industries, Jet Airways where financial creditors have taken a huge haircut. But among the high profile cases, Videocon Industries resolution is the only case where lenders have taken maximum haircut till date. Even the NCLT in its order observed this and made a sharp comment.

“As per the CoC approved Resolution Plan, Assenting Secured Financial Creditors would get only 4.89%, Dissenting Secured Financial Creditors would get only 4.56%, Assenting Unsecured Financial Creditors would get only very meagre amount of 0.62%. Out of total claim amount of Rs 71,433.75 crores, claims admitted are for Rs 64,838.63 crores and the plan is approved for an amount of only Rs 2,962.02 Crores which is only 4.15% of the total outstanding claim amount and the total hair cut to all the creditors is 95.85%. Therefore, the Successful Resolution Applicant is paying almost nothing and 99.28% hair cut is provided for Operational creditors,” the order said.

The top seven creditors which hold more than 7% of the debt and voted for the resolution in Videocon:

Creditors Share Value
State Bank of India 18.05%
IDBI Bank 16.6%
Union Bank of India + Corporation Bank + Andhra Bank 9.7%
Central Bank of India 8.43%
Bank of Baroda + Vijaya Bank + Dena Bank 6.93%
ICICI Bank 5.47%
PNB + OBC + UBI 5.02%

Liquidation takes over resolution

On one side, the top creditors want to wash away their hands and do not want to carry forward any stress, it’s the smaller lenders who are making some noise. Also, considering the huge loss to financial creditors, industry veterans and experts are criUnion Bank of India + Corporation Bank + Andhra Bankticising the whole resolution process.

Experts have been raising doubts over the whole resolution process.

In an interview with ETBFSI earlier, Siby Antony chairman of the ARC Association of India of said, “IBC is not the right solution. It is a resolution tool. If there is no resolution, automatically it goes to liquidation. That is a big problem. Resolution can be made if the underlying business is robust.”

Also, one of the top corporates Harsh Goenka has said that public money is being looted under resolutions. In the NCLT order itself, the bench has mentioned in the bracket (Hair cut or Tonsure, Total Shave).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Haircut under IBC rises to 60% in fiscal 2021, half the closes cases liquidated, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


More than half of the total 4,376 cases under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code have been closed with the rest undergoing resolution.

Almost half of the 2,653 cases closed by lenders under IBC in fiscal 2021 have ended in liquidation while only 13 per cent were resolved, according to the quarterly bulletin of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.

About 23 per cent of the closed cases are either under review or under appeal.

In 16 per cent of cases, the companies were handed back to the promoters after they cleared part of their dues under Section 12A of the insolvency act.

About 43 per cent of cases admitted so far are filed by the financial creditors while the rest 51 per cent of the admitted cases were initiated by operational creditors.

Haircut rises

In the resolved cases, the haircut, or the loss to banks on their claims, rose to 60 per cent in fiscal 2021, from 55 per cent average in the previous years.

In the March 2021 quarter alone, haircut rose to a whopping 74 per cent of the claims made by the lenders against the defaulters.

About 79 per cent of the ongoing cases till March this year have already passed 270 days since admission. Experts say delay causes erosion in the value of assets and increases chances for liquidation.

The IBC saw an addition of 499 new cases in the last financial year, where the process was suspended due to the Covid pandemic.

Liquidation

About 80% of bankruptcy proceedings involving a default of less than Rs 1 crore were initiated by operational creditors, while 80% of the cases with defaults of over Rs 10 crore were initiated on applications by financial creditors.

Around three-fourths of all bankruptcy proceedings started by operational creditors resulted in the liquidation of the corporate debtor while in case of proceedings initiated by financial creditors that have been concluded, nearly half of the businesses have faced liquidation.

About 74.37% of the corporate insolvency resolution process ending in liquidation (946 out of 1272 for which data are available) were earlier with BIFR and / or defunct.

During the quarter January-March 2021, 149 corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRPs) ended in orders for liquidation, taking the total CIRPs ending in liquidation to 1277, excluding 10 cases where liquidation orders have been set aside by NCLT, NCLAT or courts.

Of these, a final report has been submitted in 240 cases. There are 1,037 ongoing liquidation processes.

During January-March, 2021, 34 more liquidation processes were closed, taking the total number of closures by dissolution, sold as a going concern or compromise or arrangement to 138.

Growing stress

The corporate sector has pitched for a fresh suspension, arguing that there will be additional stress in the wake of the lockdown announced across most states to check the surge in cases, which are still rising by over three lakhs daily.

Industry body Assocham has urged the government to reimpose a moratorium on taking debt-ridden firms to the NCLT under the IBC till December this year following the severe second wave of coronavirus. In a representation to the Finance Ministry, the chamber said that given the increasing pressure on businesses, it would be imperative to extend the NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) moratorium to ensure that the pandemic “does not wreak havoc” on the economy.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NCLAT stays NCLT order on DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a relief to the ongoing resolution process of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has stayed an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which had directed the lenders to consider the offer made by Kapil Wadhawan.

The NCLAT heard the plea by the Committee of Creditors of DHFL challenging the May 19 order of NCLT on Tuesday.

Also read: DHFL lenders appeal against NCLT order on Wadhawan offer

Both the Committee of Creditors of DHFL as well as the Administrator had filed separate applications challenging the NCLT order to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days.

Meanwhile, the Piramal Group on Tuesday also filed a separate appeal in the NCLAT challenging the NCLT order on DHFL.

The lenders termed Wadhawan’s proposal as flimsy, replete with misrepresentations, falsehoods, without financial backing or commitments, and tendered in disregard of the scheme of the insolvency code.

The administrator questioned the NCLT order’s timing given that the Bench is to retire in June and any delay could lead to a situation where the case would have to be re-argued before a new Bench. The application sought a direction from the NCLAT to the NCLT to pass an order on the offer by the Piramal Group within one week.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks file application in NCLAT on DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Administrator and lenders to troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) have filed two applications in the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

These have been filed challenging the National Company Law Tribunal order which directed DHFL’s Committee of Creditors to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days.

Sources said that there are concerns that such a move will derail the resolution process of DHFL and could also set a bad precedent.

In his second settlement offer, Wadhawan had offered ₹91,158 crore, which is over ₹50,000 crore more than the ₹34,250 crore being offered by Piramal Enterprises Ltd.

The CoC, led by Union Bank of India, in its application has asked that the May 19 order of the NCLT should be set aside. Further the NCLT should also clear the resolution plan for DHFL.

DHFL Administrator R Subramaniakumar filed his application challenging the NCLT order on May 23.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lenders likely to move NCLAT over DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Lenders to troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) are looking at various options and are expected to file an appeal with the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Monday.

The move comes after the National Company Law Tribunal asked DHFL’s Committee of Creditors to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days. In his second settlement offer, Wadhawan had offered ₹91,158 crore, which is over ₹50,000 crore more than the ₹34,250 crore is being offered by Piramal Enterprises.

Also read: Allowing Wadhawan to present settlement offer could derail DHFL resolution process: RBI

The Reserve Bank of India in its affidavit to the NCLT had said that permitting Wadhawan to make an offer for DHFL could derail the company’s resolution process. Bankers too are not in favour of such a move and have been left worried by the NCLT decision.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code delays pit NCLAT against NCLT, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Worried by the rising number of appeals before it, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has said that there is a need to introduce a provision granting it supervisory power over the NCLTs across the country.

Due to the lack of such powers under the present laws, several people who are aggrieved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) are compelled to approach it by filing an appeal before it.

International Recreation

The appellate tribunal observation came while passing an order passed over a petition filed by the resolution professional (RP) of International Recreation and Amusement, who was aggrieved of frequent adjournments being granted by the NCLT and re-notifying the matter time and again.

According to RP, a resolution plan is pending approval before the Delhi bench of NCLT since 2019 and the matter has been adjourned as many as 18 times.

“This is not the first case of such nature,” said a two-member NCLAT bench headed by Acting Chairperson Justice B L Bhat.

The appellate tribunal further said: “There is a need to introduce a provision in the legal framework to vest power of superintendence and control qua National Company Law Tribunals in this Appellate Tribunal.

“Due to lack of supervisory jurisdiction many aggrieved persons are compelled to adopt the route of filing the appeal though there is no order on merit,” it said.

NCLAT has directed NCLT to “take a call and pass an order on merit with regard to the Resolution Plan pending consideration before it within two weeks”.

It has asked to send a copy of this order to the NCLT.

NCLT had initiated an insolvency process against International Recreation and Amusement, which had operated India’s first Amusement Park “Appu Ghar”, which was triggered on August 3, 2018.

K S Oils

Recently, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) directed to initiate the liquidation process of edible oil company K S Oils Ltd and set aside an NCLT order passed against it. Terming it “unfortunate”, the appellate tribunal observed that even after the lapse of 981 days and repeated compliance by the Resolution Professional to initiate the liquidation process, the NCLT had not considered it.

“The Appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated January 1, 2021, passed by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) is set aside and at the same time the order for initiation for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor Ms. K.S.Oils Ltd is also allowed. The Corporate Debtor- K S Oils shall liquidate in the manner as laid down in Chapter-III of the Code,” it said.

Earlier, on January 1, 2021, the Indore Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had dismissed the application filed by the RP of the debt-ridden company to initiate liquidation against K S Oils after it could not attract a buyer within the permissible time frame.

Leading bank SBI, one of the CoC Member, on behalf of joint lenders forum who collectively holds 76.53 per cent had moved NCLAT based on which the appellate tribunal had on November 18, 2019, directed lenders to consider revised plans if any within two weeks and directed NCLT to pass appropriate order in accordance with the law.

Delays

As on September 30, 2021, out of the 1,942 ongoing insolvency resolution cases as of September 30, 2020, as many as 1,442 have been stretched beyond 270 days, while 349 such cases have been pending for periods of more than 180 days but less than 270 days.

The 221 CIRPs that saw resolutions took an average of 375 days for the conclusion, exceeding the maximum 330 days permitted. The 914 cases under liquidation took on an average 309 days for the conclusion.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

After banks, regulators to appeal against NCLT order, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After banks, regulators, including the RBI, are set to appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal’s (NCLT’s) Kolkata bench, which had allowed a moratorium on debt repayment by Srei Equipment Finance (SEFL). Some lenders have already moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to stay the order and appeal against it.

Banking sources told TOI that the RBI too will file a petition in the coming days as the NCLT had stopped all government or regulatory authorities from taking any coercive steps against the non-bank finance company, “including reporting in any form and/or changing the account status of the company from being a standard asset”.

“Credit rating agencies shall not consider any nonpayment to be a default and shall maintain the rating of SEFL at least that of investment grade,” an order issued late last month said.

The NCLT has asked the company to convene meetings of debenture holders, ECB lenders and perpetual debt instrument holders between May and July to work out a new scheme of arrangement. Earlier this month, CARE Ratings said it would continue to closely monitor the developments and is also seeking legal assistance.

SEFL had argued that the RBI allowed moratorium and loan restructuring for NBFC borrowers but finance companies were not given a moratorium. This along with the economic downturn in the wake of Covid-19, has led to an asset-liability mismatch, it argued.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2