Kotak Mahindra Group announces new chiefs for insurance business

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Kotak Mahindra Group on Friday announced two key appointments for their insurance businesses.

Mahesh Balasubramanian will be the Managing Director of Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance and Suresh Agarwal will be the Managing Director and CEO of Kotak General Insurance. These appointments will be effective May 1, 2021.

“These moves come as G Murlidhar completes a 10-year term as the Managing Director of Kotak Life and superannuates on Friday (April 30, 2021),” Kotak Mahindra Group said in a statement.

Balasubramanian is the MD and CEO of Kotak GI, and has been heading the company since 2014 while Agarwal led Kotak Life’s distribution network and has played a vital role in establishing a vast pan-India network for the company.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

FIDC asks RBI to put off norms on auditor appointment by NBFCs to next fiscal

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Industry Development Council has requested the Reserve Bank of India to push back the guidelines for appointment of statutory auditors of banks and non-banking finance companies to April 1, 2022 or fiscal year 2022-23.

To give NBFCs time to comply with the new norms, and “For smooth implementation and minimum disruption, the applicability of the circular can be with effect from April 1, 2022,” FIDC said in a representation to the RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das.

FIDC is a representative body of assets and loan financing NBFCs.

“Most of the NBFCs have already finalised the auditors for 2021-22 and the flexibility of changing auditors in the second half of 2021-22 doesn’t really help as shareholder approval would be required and the notice of the AGM would have already been finalised,” FIDC said.

Further, identifying a new auditor will take some time and it would be difficult for any new auditor to audit the accounts in a six month period, it said.

Cooling period

FIDC has also suggested that the cooling period should be reduced to five years instead of six as this will then better align with the Companies Act.

The RBI had on April 27 issued guidelines for appointment of statutory central auditors and statutory auditors for commercial banks, urban cooperative banks and NBFCs for the financial year 2021-22 and onwards.

UCBs and NBFCs will have the flexibility to adopt these guidelines from the second half of the year. While NBFCs do not have to take prior approval of the RBI for appointment of these auditors, all entities need to inform the RBI about the appointment for each year. Non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size below ₹1,000 crore can continue with extant procedure.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CRISIL, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Over the last six months, the gold price has corrected 10% on a 30-day rolling basis, although it has dropped double that amount on an absolute basis.

According to CRISIL Ratings, the recent drop in gold prices is unlikely to have a significant effect on the asset quality of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) that lend against gold. However, Banks that disbursed gold loans aggressively during the previous fiscal year may see an impact on their asset quality.

In addition to receiving interest on a regular basis, NBFCs have ensured that the disbursement loan-to-value (LTV) is held below 75 percent over the past few fiscals. The average portfolio LTV for NBFCs was 63-67 percent as of December 31, 2020, while the average LTV on incremental disbursements in the October-December 2020 quarter was 70 percent. Interest receivables have remained at just 2-4 percent of the loan book over the last few years, demonstrating the LTV discipline.

Banks, on the other hand, had a higher incremental-disbursement LTV of 78-82 percent than NBFCs. Most of their book’s growth occurred in the third quarter of last fiscal year, when gold prices were soaring. In the 11 months through February 2021, Bank loans against gold increased by 70% to over Rs 56,000 crore. Announcement made by Reserve Bank of India (RBI), August 2020 that the LTV limit would be relaxed to 90% (only for banks), contributed to this growth.

Krishnan Sitaraman, Senior Director & Deputy Chief Ratings Officer, CRISIL Ratings, said, “Without periodic interest collections, banks’ books can be vulnerable to asset-quality issues to some degree, given that gold prices have fallen 18-20% from their August peaks on an absolute basis. However, with the LTV dispensation period ending in March 2021, incremental lending would have more LTV cushion.”

Cushion available with lenders in terms of the value of gold provided as collateral relative to the loan outstanding is influenced by LTV and timely interest collection. As a result, reliable risk management systems and timely auctions are critical for mitigating gold price fluctuations and eventual credit loss.

Ajit Velonie, Director, CRISIL Ratings, said, “While gross non-performing assets (GNPA) could rise, ultimate credit cost – a more appropriate indicator of asset quality for gold loans – is not expected to. Although NBFCs’ GNPAs had risen to as high as 7%, credit costs were still low at 10 to 80 basis points. This demonstrates sound business judgement and timely auctions. Given the rapid growth that banks have experienced, tracking LTV, and remaining agile is critical for avoiding possible asset-quality issues.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Gold price fall not much of a worry for NBFCs: Crisil

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

The correction in gold prices in recent months is unlikely to have a significant impact on the asset quality of NBFCs lending against gold, said Crisil Ratings on Monday.

“Apart from periodically collecting interest over the past few fiscals, they have ensured that disbursement loan-to-value (LTV) is maintained below 75 per cent,” it said in a statement.

On a 30-day rolling basis, gold price has corrected about 10 per cent over the past six months, while on an absolute basis it has fallen twice that rate.

For NBFCs, the average portfolio LTV as on December 31, 2020, was about 63-67 per cent, while average LTV on incremental disbursements in the October-December 2020 quarter was nearly 70 per cent, said Crisil.

Why gold is set to continue its rally

“The LTV discipline is also evident in interest receivables remaining at just two per cent to four per cent of the loan book over the past few years,” it further said.

For banks, however, incremental-disbursement LTV was higher at 78-82 per cent because they were more aggressive than NBFCs in lending against gold during last fiscal, said Crisil, adding that much of the growth in their book came during the third quarter of last fiscal, when gold prices were soaring.

“Given that gold prices have dropped 18-20 per cent from their August peaks on an absolute basis, without periodic interest collections, the books of banks may be susceptible to asset-quality issues to some extent. However, with the LTV dispensation period ending in March 2021, incremental lending would have more LTV cushion,” said Krishnan Sitaraman, Senior Director and Deputy Chief Ratings Officer, Crisil Ratings.

Since June 2020, loans against gold surged. In the 11 months through February 2021, loans against gold grew about 70 per cent for banks to over ₹56,000 crore. The growth was aided by the LTV relaxation to 90 per cent (only for banks) announced in August last year.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NBFCs to face fresh challenges due to Covid surge: Analysts

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Meanwhile, the extension of the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) for SMEs till June 2021 will offer such borrowers further breathing space.

India’s non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) face renewed asset quality and liquidity risks as the country battles a fresh surge in coronavirus infections, analysts said. There could be a fall in securitisation volumes, as was seen in H1FY21, affecting non-bank lenders adversely.

The economic impact of various restrictions imposed by states will depend on their duration and severity. Expanded curbs could derail the fragile recovery in India’s NBFC sector since a nationwide lockdown was gradually relaxed from mid-2020, rating agency Fitch said on Thursday.

“SMEs (small and medium enterprises), commercial vehicle operators, microfinance and other wholesale borrowers remain at greater risk of stress in this environment, particularly as financial buffers would have narrowed after the severe economic shock over the past year. Production and supply chains remain susceptible to labour shortages if the large-scale urban-to-rural labour migration in 2020 recurs,” Fitch said in a note.

At the same time, regulators appear keenly aware of the credit and liquidity implications of any broad, extended movement curbs, while NBFCs’ day-to-day operations are also likely to be able to continue under the latest rules.

A resurgence in asset-quality pressure for NBFcs could lead to renewed funding strains for the sector, particularly as many government schemes that provided funding relief to NBFCs in 2020 have expired. These include the partial credit guarantee scheme supporting asset-backed securitisation and special liquidity scheme providing government-guaranteed short-term funding relief. Meanwhile, the extension of the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) for SMEs till June 2021 will offer such borrowers further breathing space.

Icra Ratings said that due to the Covid-19 pandemic and resultant nationwide lockdowns, securitisation volumes had seen an unprecedented fall in H1FY21 after two successive years of healthy volumes close to Rs 2 lakh crore each. As economic activity gradually resumed and loan disbursements gained momentum, even reaching pre-Covid levels for some NBFCs, the securitisation market saw a healthy uptick in volumes during H2FY21. As per the rating agency’s estimates, the securitisation volumes for FY21 were at about Rs 85,000–90,000 crore, of which volumes in Q4 contributed nearly 45%.

Abhishek Dafria, vice-president and head – structured finance ratings, Icra, said that the rising Covid cases may again create uncertainty among investors. While the lockdowns announced so far are less restrictive in comparison to the nationwide lockdown seen last year, an unabated increase in Covid cases is likely to bring about fears of harsher lockdowns which could impact the asset quality of retail loans. “This in turn would impact the fundraising ability of the NBFCs and HFCs through securitisation of their assets. Successful implementation of the vaccination programme and ability of government agencies to arrest the rising infections would remain critical in the near term,” Dafria said.

Among its rated issuers, Fitch views IIFL Finance as the most vulnerable to recent developments due to its exposure to affected states and to higher-risk developers, SMEs and microfinance. Shriram Transport Finance Company is also relatively exposed because of its concentration in commercial vehicle finance, although essential-goods volumes could provide an offset in affected areas.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Asian companies ready debt deals under new benchmark rate rules

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Asia’s financial companies are gearing up to issue their first debt using a new global benchmark interest rate that will replace the contentious Liboras the region catches up to the rest of the world, according to bankers and advisors.

Britain’s financial regulators last week called a formal halt to nearly all Libor rates from the end of this year, piling pressure on markets to quicken a switch in interest rates used in $260 trillion of contracts globally.

Also read: The end of Libor: the biggest banking challenge you’ve never heard of

Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate) is being replaced with rates compiled by central banks after lenders were fined billions of dollars for trying to rig the reference rate for their own gain in 2012.

Also read: NBFCs in India need to plan for effective IBOR transition: EY India

SOFR replaces Dollar Libor

The Dollar Libor will be replaced by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), which is published by the New York Federal Reserve to use as a reference point for US dollar derivative and debt transactions.

The deadline is likely to expedite the number of debt transactions in Asia using SOFR to meet the regulator’s timetable and set the borrowers’ costs of funds, after the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a slow take-up rate in the region.

“The first wave of deals using the new benchmarks will be initiated by banks, financial institutions and asset managers due to the push by regulators on them to lead the way,” said Jean Woo, partner at law firm Ashurst.

Asia’s first issuance

Korea Development Bank (KDB), a state-owned policy bank,last week raised $300 million in a three-year floating rate note– the first issuance in Asia sold globally using SOFR as the reference rate.

Also read: ICICI bank makes its first interbank-money market transaction linked with SOFR

Some $2.25 billion worth of SOFR bonds have been issued in Asia in the past 12 months compared to the global total of $160.8 billion, according to Refinitiv data. US companies have issued $124.9 billion worth of SOFR linked deals in that time.

“The whole world is moving towards it, people cannot be closed to the fact there is a change and issuers need to be making steps towards moving to the transitions,” said Amy Tan,head of DCM Origination Asia ex-Japan at JPMorgan.

Joseph Pepping, head of debt capital markets syndicate for the Asia-Pacific region at Bank of America, said the switch away from LIBOR had not been a high priority for Asian borrowers in 2020 but he expected that to change.

“We expect … for more Asian issuers to elevate this on their priority list,” he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Securitisation of retail assets by NBFCs, HFCs jump 61% in Q3

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Securitisation of retail assets by non-banking finance companies (NBFCs) and housing finance companies (HFCs) saw a healthy 61 per cent quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) jump to about ₹24,400 crore in Q3 (October-December) FY2021 against about ₹15,200 crore in Q2 (July-September) FY2021, according to ICRA.

The credit rating agency observed that ever since the sharp fall in domestic securitisation volumes (to ₹7,500 crore) seen in Q1 (April-June) FY2021, the securitisation market has been on a path of revival on a sequential basis.

The number of originators that undertook securitisation has also improved 50 in Q3 FY2021 as against 45 and 18 in Q2 and Q1 FY2021, respectively.

ICRA opined that investors and originators are again seeing securitisation as a viable funding tool given the healthy collections seen across most asset classes post the end of the moratorium period in August 2020 provided under Reserve Bank of India’s ‘Covid-19 Regulatory Package’.

Nevertheless, the securitisation volumes remain below the pre-Covid levels as reflected in the 48 per cent year-on-year (YoY) drop in Q3 volumes. Securitisation volumes in Q3 FY2020 were about ₹47,000 crore

Abhishek Dafria, Vice President and Head – Structured Finance Ratings, ICRA, said: “The increase in securitisation volumes in the past two quarters could be seen as a sign of the path to normalcy for NBFCs and HFCs at least as far as disbursements are concerned.

“The Covid-19 pandemic and the nationwide lockdown had led to a major shock to the system especially in Q1 FY2021, but as the lockdowns have eased and the Government has taken steps to revive the economy, the retail loan demand has picked up. We have seen healthy increase in securitisation transactions, especially by HFCs in Q3 FY2021.”

Dafria underscored that most investors maintain stringent filters during pool selection. Still, there is a considerable increase in appetite for purchase of such retail pools, mainly in the secured asset class, which will augur well for the market.

The agency has maintained its annual securitisation volume estimate at ₹80,000 crore to ₹90,000 crore for FY2021 with the quarterly growth momentum is expected to continue in the next fiscal year.

Securitisation volume dominated by secured assets

ICRA said the securitisation volumes have been largely dominated by the secured asset class this fiscal.

The proportion of mortgage-backed securities (MBS, includes home loan and loan against property) in the total securitisation volumes improved to 42 per cent for Q3 FY2021 compared to 33 per cent in H1 (April-September) FY2021 as the asset class has seen the least disruption in collections due to the pandemic and consequently, relatively lower spike in delinquencies.

The agency assessed that securitisation of gold loan pools, backed by stable security, continued to find investors, forming about 15 per cent of the volumes seen in Q3.

Sachin Joglekar, Assistant Vice President, ICRA, said: “Due to the uncertainty in the environment caused by the pandemic, we have seen investors increase their focus to the secured asset class where the losses would be restricted due to the presence of adequate collaterals.

“The dominance of asset classes like mortgage-backed loans and gold loans is a clear indication of the same. On the other hand, unsecured loans like microfinance loans continue to remain limited in the securitisation market, forming about 5-6 per cent in Q3 FY2021, as against 15-20 per cent seen in FY2020.”

However, even microfinance entities have seen a healthy increase in disbursement levels in recent months. ICRA expects their share in securitisation to improve from Q4 (January-March 2021) onwards as they would have better pool availability meeting the investor criteria.

While the delinquency levels have seen an increase across asset classes as expected post the end of the moratorium, ICRA has observed that the credit enhancement available in its rated transactions have been adequate to take care of any shortfall in collections which would also give confidence to the investors.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NBFCs included in TLTRO ‘on tap’ scheme

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India on Friday proposed to provide funds from banks under the TLTRO ‘on tap scheme’ to NBFCs for incremental lending to these sectors.

Reserve Bank of India Governor Shaktikanta Das said NBFCs are well recognised conduits for reaching out last mile credit and act as a force multiplier in expanding credit to various sectors.

“With a view to support revival of activity in specific stressed sectors that have both backward and forward linkages and have multiplier effects on growth, the RBI had announced the TLTRO on Tap Scheme for banks on October 9, 2020,” Das said on Friday.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI unveils risk-based internal audit guidelines for select NBFCs, urban co-op banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday unveiled the risk-based internal audit (RBIA) system for select non-bank lenders and urban co-operative banks, with a view to enhance the quality and effectiveness of their internal audit system. All the deposit-taking non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) and the ones with an asset size of over Rs 5,000 crore, and urban co-operatives banks (UCBs) with assets of over Rs 500 crore will have to migrate to the new system, the RBI said.

Currently, all the entities supervised by the RBI have their own approaches on internal audit, resulting in certain inconsistencies, risks and gaps in the system, the RBI said.

The NBFCs and UCBs face risks similar to the ones for scheduled commercial banks which require an alignment of processes, it added.

The central bank said the RBIA is an audit methodology that links an organisation’s overall risk management framework. It provides an assurance to the board of directors and the senior management on the quality and effectiveness of the organisation’s internal controls, risk management and governance-related systems and processes, it added.

The internal audit function is an integral part of sound corporate governance and is considered as the third line of defence, it said.

Historically, the internal audit system at NBFCs/UCBs has generally been concentrating on transaction testing, testing of accuracy and reliability of accounting records and financial reports, adherence to legal and regulatory requirements, which might not be sufficient in a changing scenario.

A shift to a framework which focuses on evaluation of the risk management systems and control procedures in various areas of operations, in addition to transaction testing, will help in anticipating areas of potential risks and mitigating such risks, the RBI said.

RBIA should undertake an independent risk assessment for the purpose of formulating a risk-based audit plan, which considers the inherent business risks emanating from an activity/location and the effectiveness of the control systems for monitoring such inherent risks, it said.

The entities have to implement the RBIA framework by March 31, 2022, and have been asked to constitute a committee of senior executives with the responsibility of formulating a suitable action plan.

The panel may address transitional and change management issues and should report progress periodically to the board and senior management, the central bank said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI issues guidelines on risk-based internal audit for NBFCs, UCBs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday issued guidelines on risk-based internal audit (RBIA) framework for Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) and Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks (UCBs) which they need to implement by March 21, 2022.

The RBIA framework has been specifically mandated for supervised entities (SEs) — all deposit-taking NBFCs; all non-deposit taking NBFCs (including Core Investment Companies) with asset size of ₹5,000 crore and above; and all UCBs with asset size of ₹500 crore and above — to enhance the efficacy of their internal audit systems and processes.

Also read Regulating NBFCs

RBI asked the SEs to place the RBIA circular before their Board in its next meeting. The implementation of these guidelines as per timeline specified should be done under the oversight of the Board.

The central bank observed that the internal audit function should broadly assess and contribute to the overall improvement of the organization’s governance, risk management, and control processes using a systematic and disciplined approach. The function is an integral part of sound corporate governance and is considered as the third line of defence.

The supervised entities (SEs) will have to move towards a framework which will include, in addition to selective transaction testing, an evaluation of the risk management systems and control procedures in various areas of operations. This will also help in anticipating areas of potential risks and mitigating such risks.

Audit plan and review

Per the guidelines, RBIA should undertake an independent risk assessment for the purpose of formulating a risk-based audit plan which considers the inherent business risks emanating from an activity / location and the effectiveness of the control systems for monitoring such inherent risks.

The RBIA policy must be reviewed periodically. The risk assessment of business and other functions of the organization shall at the minimum be conducted on an annual basis. Every activity / location, including the risk management and compliance functions, shall be subjected to risk assessment by the RBIA, according to the guidelines.

Also read RBI’s norms will enhance stability of NBFC sector: Fitch Ratings

The SEs RBIA policy should also lay down the maximum time period beyond which even the low risk business activities / locations would not remain excluded for audit.

The Audit Committee of the Board (ACB)/ Board should formulate and maintain a quality assurance and improvement program that covers all aspects of the internal audit function.

The quality assurance program may include assessment of the internal audit function at least once in a year for adherence to the internal audit policy, objectives and expected outcomes.

RBI said a consolidated position of major risks faced by the organization needs to be presented at least annually to the ACB/Board, based on inputs from all forms of audit.

Authority and competence

The regulator wants senior management of SEs to ensure that the RBIA function is adequately staffed with skilled personnel of right aptitude and attitude who are periodically trained to update their knowledge, skill and competencies.

RBI emphasised that the internal audit function must have sufficient authority, stature, independence and resources thereby enabling internal auditors to carry out their assignments properly.

The Head of Internal Audit (HIA) shall be a senior executive with the ability to exercise independent judgment. Except for the entities where the internal audit function is a specialised function and managed by career internal auditors, the HIA shall be appointed for a reasonably long period, preferably for a minimum of three years.

RBI said requisite professional competence, knowledge and experience — including banking/financial entity’s operations, accounting, information technology, data analytics, forensic investigation, among others.– of each internal auditor is essential for the effectiveness of internal audit function. The collective skill levels should be adequate to audit all areas of the SE.

The SEs may prepare a Risk Audit Matrix based on the magnitude and frequency of risk.

RBI said the internal audit function should not be outsourced. However, where required, experts including former employees can be hired on a contractual basis subject to the ACB/Board being assured that such expertise does not exist within the audit function of the SE.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4