Banks may sell Rs 1 lakh crore of fraud-hit loans to NARCL, ARCs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks may offload about Rs 1 lakh crore of accounts with fraudulent activities to National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) and other ARCs with the Reserve Bank of India allowed lenders to sell such loans.

In the last three years, banks have declared loan frauds amounting to Rs 3.95 lakh crore.

The new rule is part of the RBIs final norms on the transfer of loan exposures.

The move has opened a new avenue for ARCs, which till now were allowed to take over non-performing assets as well as loans which are in default for 60 days.

This bad loans that ARCs can take over include loan exposures classified as fraud as on the date of transfer provided that the responsibilities of the transferor with respect to continuous reporting, monitoring, filing of complaints with law enforcement agencies and proceedings related to such complaints shall also be transferred to the ARC, the central bank said. The transfer of such loan exposures to an ARC, however, does not absolve the transferor from fixing the staff accountability as required under the extant instructions on frauds.

Banks have to make 100% provision in four quarters for accounts tagged in the fraud category. In the case of non-performing assets without delayed recovery, 100% provisioning effectively happens over eight quarters.

Swiss challenge

Banks may sell Rs 1 lakh crore of fraud-hit loans to NARCL, ARCs

The RBI has clarified on the called Swiss Challenge Method, applicable while transferring stressed loans by lenders. The RBI had proposed de-regulate price discovery by departing from Swiss Challenge auction method, where the highest bid in the first round or unsolicited bid received becomes the base for seeking counter offers.

The central bank said that in cases where the aggregate exposure of lenders to a borrower whose loan is being transferred is above 1 bln rupees, Swiss Challenge method must be followed. In all other cases, the bilateral negotiations shall be subject to the price discovery and value maximisation approaches adopted by the transferor as part of the board approved policy, which may also include Swiss Challenge method, it said However, in case of such transfers used as means for resolution under the RBI’s Jun 7, 2019 circular, Swiss Challenge method would be mandatory irrespective of the exposure threshold.

The RBI said that lenders must have a board-approved policy on the adoption of Swiss Challenge method. The policy could include parameters such as a tolerance limit on haircut required by the lenders in the base-bid and minimum mark-up for over the base for seeking counter offers, the RBI said. Such minimum mark-up, difference between the challenger and the base-bid expressed as a percentage of the base-bid, must not be less than 5% and not be more than 15%.

The bad bank

Banks may sell Rs 1 lakh crore of fraud-hit loans to NARCL, ARCs

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday announced a Rs 30,600 crore government guarantee for the National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL) for acquiring stressed loan assets, paving the way for operationalisation of the bad bank.

The finance minister in Budget 2021-22 announced the setting up of a bad bank as part of the resolution of bad loans worth about Rs 2 lakh crore.

The bad bank or NARCL will pay up to 15 per cent of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85 per cent would be government-guaranteed security receipts (SRs). The government guarantee would be invoked if there is a loss against the threshold value.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI allows banks to sell fraud NPAs to ARCs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a move that will help banks unload a major chunk of their non-performing assets (NPAs) to the bad bank, RBI has allowed the sale of loan accounts classified as fraud to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs). Earlier, banks were barred from selling NPAs classified as fraud, which had left them saddled with a resolution of several large accounts.

Banks are targeting to sell Rs 2 lakh crore worth of NPAs to the bad bank or the National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL) for recovery. However, they have hit a roadblock in respect of accounts that have been classified as fraud, as they were not allowed to sell them. RBI has now allowed banks to sell fraud accounts, provided the transferee is not connected to the borrower.

RBI has also said that responsibilities of the transferor with respect to continuous reporting, monitoring, filing of complaints with law enforcement agencies and proceedings related to such complaints shall also be transferred to the ARC. “The transfer of such loan exposures to an ARC, however, does not absolve the transferor from fixing the staff accountability as required under the extant instructions on frauds,” RBI said.

“Due to forensic audit in all big NPAs, in last three years, advances amounting Rs 3.83 lakh crore were declared as fraud accounts. This chunk of NPAs will be available for sale to ARCs,” Hari Hara Mishra, director, UV ARC, said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Several NPAs transferred to bad bank may head to liquidation, cost govt a bomb, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government has announced the setting up of National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd with much fanfare and committed over Rs 30,000 crore guarantee for bad assets acquired by it, but it may be used up soon, going by the initial assets going by the list of assets proposed to be transferred to the bad bank.

Banks have identified Rs 82,496 crores worth of bad loans that could be transferred to the NARCL, which includes the following companies.

COMPANIES TOTAL BAD LOANS
Videocon Rs 22,532 crore
Reliance Naval & Engineering Rs 8,934 crore
Amtex Auto Rs 9,014 crore
Jaypee Infratech Rs 7, 950 crore
Castex Technologies Rs 6,337 crore
GTL Ltd Rs 4,866 crore
Visa Steel Rs 3,394 crore
Wind World India Ltd Rs 3,161 crore
Lavasa Corporation Rs 1,424 crore
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd Rs 1,353 crore

Also read: NARCL will empower lenders, but recovery from 26 accounts is not easy, industry says
Several assets such as Videocon have seen realisable value close to liquidation value in National Company Law Tribunal proceedings. Many big-ticket resolutions at Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code have seen haircuts over 90%. With most of the NPAs proposed to be transferred to the bad bank being old legacy ones, there has been an erosion in value, making them more likely to head to liquidation.

Lavasa Corporation has got bids worth Rs 700 crore for loan claims of over Rs 8,000 crore at NCLT.

Several NPAs transferred to bad bank may head to liquidation, cost govt a bomb

Close to liquidation

Though banks have made 100% provision for these assets, even Rajkiran Rai, chairman of Indian Banks Association, and MD & CEO of Union Bank of India does not expect more than 20-25 per cent recovery from these legacy accounts, he told a television channel.

The State Bank of India has identified NPAs with Rs 17,000-18,000 crore outstanding to be transferred to the NARCL, while Punjab National Bank has identified Rs 8,000 crore worth of NPAs, Union Bank of India Rs 7,800 crore of NPAs to be transferred to the National ARC. The Bank of India has identified about Rs 5,500 crores of assets for transfer while Indian Bank about Rs 1,900 crore.

“I am not hopeful. Because these are bad assets. Finally, all these will go under liquidation,” Siby Antony, chairman of the ARC Association of India.

The bad bank

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced a Rs 30,600 crore government guarantee for the National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL) for acquiring stressed loan assets, paving the way for operationalisation of the bad bank.

Also read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore

The finance minister in Budget 2021-22 announced the setting up of a bad bank as part of the resolution of bad loans worth about Rs 2 lakh crore.

The bad bank or NARCL will pay up to 15 per cent of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85 per cent would be government-guaranteed security receipts (SRs). The government guarantee would be invoked if there is a loss against the threshold value.

Also read: What are NARCL and IDRCL? How do they work and what is the plan?

This sovereign guarantee would be for a period of five years and NARCL would have to pay a fee for this.

“The SRs are getting the backstop through government funding only in as much as to pay the gap between the realised value (resolution/liquidation) and the face value of SRs and this will hold good for five years,” Sitharaman said.

The fee for the guarantee would be initially 0.25 per cent, which would progressively increase to 0.5 per cent in case of delay in resolution of bad loans.

Click here to read more stories on banking



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

BoI, Union Bank, PNB may gain most from bad bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL) will have maximum impact on loan books of Bank of India (BoI), Union Bank and Punjab National Bank (PNB), which will sell over 1% of their loans to the bad bank. According to rating agency Crisil, the bad bank, or NARCL, will lower the NPA level of banks by 20-25% over time.

However, the immediate impact on the bottom line will be limited as lenders who sell loans in the first phase will receive just around Rs 2,700 crore upfront cash payment as against the Rs 90,000 crore of bad loans they sell to the corporation. Also, investing in the security receipts issued by NARCL will not increase the capital requirement of banks due to the government guarantee.

Of the Rs 2 lakh crore of bad loans to be transferred to NARCL, around Rs 30,600 crore will be guaranteed for five years. NARCL will pay 15% of whatever amount the loans are valued at, in cash. The remaining 85% will be paid using security receipts. According to a Jefferies report, the government guarantee will keep the security capital neutral as without the guarantee banks will have to set aside funds towards provisions. A sovereign guarantee being risk-free does not attract similar capital requirements.

“For the guaranteed part, banks will recognise the value as an investment but that will not require any capital for 5 years as there is government guarantee. For non-guaranteed part, banks might not recognise value until actual recovery is made,” the Jefferies report said.

According to the report, of the first lot, SBI will be transferring the biggest chunk of loans at Rs 20,000 crore. However, given the size, the sale will be only 0.8% of its loan book. While BoI, Union Bank and PNB will be selling much less at Rs 5,500 crore, Rs 7,800 crore and Rs 8,000 crore, their loans will be a much bigger chunk of their balance sheet. For BoI, the loans sold will be 1.5% of its book, 1.3% for Union Bank and 1.2% for PNB, Jefferies said.

“The sovereign guarantee will cushion security receipt investors against potential lower recoveries. This could, in turn, potentially enable the development of a secondary market in security receipts, which has proved elusive so far,” said Crisil senior director and deputy chief ratings officer Krishnan Sitaraman.

The loans sold to the bad bank include Rs 22,500-crore exposure to Videocon Oil Ventures, where SBI is the lead bank. Another large account is Union Bank-led account of Amtek Auto, which has Rs 9,014 crore of bank loans. IDBI is the lead banker in three large accounts — Reliance Naval, Jaypee Infra and GTL.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NARCL will have negligible short-term impact for banks: Kotak Securities report

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL),which is being put together by public sector banks and a few private sector banks to clean up their bad loans, will have negligible short-term impact as the upfront cash received is a smaller proportion and divided across banks, according to a Kotak Securities Ltd (KSL) report.

Government guarantee, aggregating ₹30,600 crore, to the cecurity receipts (SRs) to be issued by NARCL puts a 18 per cent floor on recovery rate, the report said.

The government guarantee on SRs can enable trading of these securities (that is converted into cash in secondary market).

“The upfront cash received, 15 per cent of the written-down value, will be reversed while the provisions for the balance (value of security receipts) are unlikely to be reversed even if it is fully provided.” said a team of six KSL analysts led by MB Mahesh.

As this cash is a smaller proportion and divided across public banks and a few private banks, the short-term impact is negligible, the analysts added.

They opined that larger release of provisions, if any, would be made as and when the cash is received on sale of these receipts or redemption of security receipts.

The analysts felt that banks are unlikely to reverse any provisions based on their discussions with these banks in the past on this topic.

They assessed that a 15:85 (cash: SR) structure implies that the ₹30,600 crore guarantee would translate to ₹36,000 crore of marked-down value of NPLs.

So, the ₹2 lakh crore of NPLs (non-performing loans) purchase value would imply 18 per cent recovery rate.

“Today, the NPL recognition and provisions cycle is largely complete with some of the largest bad loans already resolved.

“Banks have about 90-100 per cent (provision) coverage on these assets, implying there is no management incentive to delay decision making,”the analysts said.

The NPLs (written-off or otherwise) exchanged for security receipts are fully provided but the analysts don’t expect banks to reverse provisions.

Major benefit

The report emphasised that the major benefit of NARCL would accrue through faster debt consolidation, potentially leading to quicker decision making and better recovery rates.

Further, senior management bandwidth would be released on solving these problems, which can be channelized towards identifying fresh segments for growth that has been tepid in recent years.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bad Bank to solve Rs 2 lakh crore bad loans, take NPAs off banks’ books; here’s how it will work

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday announced that the Union government will guarantee Rs 30,600 worth of security receipts issued by the National Asset Reconstruction Company.

The Bad Bank is finally here, after a decade of discourse. It aims to help clean up banks’ books by taking over Rs 2 lakh crore bad loans. If it works as intended, Bad Bank may help cut system-wide bank NPAs (non-performing assets) by over 1%, and help recover some of bad debts too, analysts say. The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL), as it is officially named, will acquire banks’ bad debt to resolve or liquidate. It will buy these stressed assets for a mix of cash, and government-guaranteed security receipts.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday announced that the Union government will guarantee Rs 30,600 worth of security receipts issued by the National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL). “NARCL will acquire stressed assets through 15% cash payment to banks based on valuation and the rest 85% will be given as security receipts,” Nirmala Sitharaman said. The government-backed security receipts can only be invoked on resolution or liquidation.

What is NARCL? Why is it needed?

The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL) was proposed by the Finance Minister in her Union Budget speech. NARCL, popularly known as Bad Bank, will function as an asset reconstruction company set up by banks to resolve stressed assets for smoother functioning. Public sector banks will have 51% ownership in NARCL. The bad bank intends to resolve stressed loan assets above Rs 500 crore each.

How the Bad Bank will work

Bad loan transfer: NARCL will take over bad loans worth Rs 2 lakh crore from banks, of which Rs 90,000 crore will be taken over in the first phase. The Ministry of Finance said that NARCL will acquire bad loans from banks for a mutually agreed-upon value (understandably, a net value after a haircut). NARCL will pay 15% of the agreed net value of the bad debt upfront in cash and the remaining 85% in form of security receipts. The banks would use this 15% cash upfront to reverse the debt write down. As for the security receipts for the remaining 85%, the bank would redeem those when the bad bank resolves or liquidates the bad debt; or, the bank may also trade these securities for cash.

Provision write-back: “These loans are fully provided in the books of the bank. The upfront cash received, 15% of the written-down value, would be reversed while the provisions for the balance (value of security receipts) are unlikely to be reversed even if it is fully provided,” analysts at Kotak Securities wrote in a note. “The larger release of provisions, if any, would be made as and when the cash is received on sale of these receipts or redemption of security receipts. The government guarantee on SRs can enable trading of these securities,” Kotak Securities added.

Government guarantee: The security receipts issued by NARCL are backed by the Union government guarantee. The government guarantee will cover any shortfall between the face value of the receipts and the actual realisation value of the bad loan.

Resolution is key

“How efficiently the professionals are resolving the stressed assets is to be monitored. One can argue that bad bank is likely to become a warehouse for stressed loans without expected recovery as it will be difficult to find buyers for legacy assets,” ICICI Securities said in a note. The Resolution of the proposed Rs 2 lakh crore of legacy stressed assets will lower GNPLs (gross non performing loans) by more than 2%, the note said. The estimated realisable value of 18% will lead to provisioning write-back of Rs 36,000 crore. “Through successful execution of phase-1, one can expect near term NPA reduction of >1% and NPA recoveries equivalent to 10bps of system credit,” ICICI Securities said.

Why is government guarantee needed?

The government said that resolution mechanisms of dealing with a backlog of NPAs typically require a backstop from the Government. “This imparts credibility and provides for contingency buffers. Hence, a Government Guarantee of up to Rs 30,600 crore will back Security Receipts (SRs) issued by NARCL. The guarantee will be valid for 5 years. The condition precedent for invocation of guarantee would be resolution or liquidation,” the finance ministry said.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NARCL will empower lenders, but recovery from 26 accounts is not easy, industry says, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) will kill all communication gaps that bank consortiums face, and will speed up the process. But chances are high that the NARCL will face a tough time recovering from the 26 accounts that have been identified.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday said that the government has allocated more than Rs. 30,600 crore to the NARCL. The government will transfer the funds to the bad bank, according to their calendar. The Cabinet has approved to set up the NARCL, backed by the government securities, she added.

Read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore on securities receipts

NARCL – sole decision maker

Industry veterans believe that NARCL will strengthen the recovery process.

“The first and foremost advantage is that the NARCL will provide consolidation of the debt. The debt, which is spread out in 10-20 different entities of the consortium or the multiple banking arrangement, will be consolidated into one entity, providing ease of resolution. In a multiple banking arrangement, there is always a difference of opinion, which makes it difficult to reach a resolution plan,” said Sunil Mehta, chief executive officer at Indian Banks’ Association.

The biggest benefit banks will have is that they will get 15% funds upfront from the NARCL as soon as they transfer the assets. In the current scenario, it takes months for bankers to get their first cheque after a rigorous process either at the National Company Law Tribunal or at Debt Recovery Tribunals.

Read: What are NARCL and IDRCL? How do they work and what is the plan?

“The intention and the idea behind bad banks is that all the bad loans of the banks are concentrated at one place so there will be one common decision making entity. This will make the execution of asset resolution far faster,” said Jyoti Prakash Gadia, managing director at Resurgent India.

NARCL will empower lenders, but recovery from 26 accounts is not easy, industry says
Operations and recovery

Public sector banks will hold 51% stake in the NARCL, while debt management and other financial institutions will hold 49%. NARCL will be managed by professionals, and non performing asset accounts, which are larger than Rs. 500 crore, will be transferred to it. Currently, banks have identified 26 accounts, worth around Rs. 90,000 crore, which the NARCL will take over from them.

The hope is that the government-backed bad bank will bring in the right value for the banks. Because in the current situation, liquidation is much higher compared with resolution, and lenders have taken more than 90% haircuts in many accounts, including Videocon Industries, Siva Industries etc.

But while NARCL will reduce the gaps and speed up the recovery, experts have their own doubts on its recovery ratio, considering the quality of 26 assets, which will be transferred.

“I am not sure if NARCL will be able to fully recover all the accounts mentioned in the list. However, it is still better than individual recovery,” said Gadia.

Recovery has always been a challenge for lenders. RBI Governor Shakikanta Das had recently highlighted that the total recovery from Lokadalat is 5%, from DRT is 6% and from SARFAESI is 20%. The highest recovery was from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which was 30-45% in earlier days, is now reduced to 5% amid the pandemic, Das said.

Hence, despite having an NARCL, the industry is not hoping for a significant recovery. “The major challenge is that assets mentioned in the list are not very lucrative and buyers will also offer the cheapest rate,” said an industry expert, who did not wish to be quoted.

Siby Antony, former MD and CEO of Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction and a veteran in the sector, believes that ARCs will be better at reviving assets, but is not very sure whether the NARCL will recover.

“I am not hopeful. Because these (the 26 accounts) are bad assets, and finally all will go under liquidation,” Antony said.

Watch: Bad bank can only be a warehouse of bad assets, says Siby Antony



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What are NARCL and IDRCL? How do they work and what is the plan?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday announced the formation of a government-backed bad bank, National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL). The Union Cabinet has approved up to Rs 30,600 crore of securities receipts.

What is NARCL?

The NARCL has been incorporated under the Companies Act and has applied to the Reserve Bank of India for license as an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC). NARCL is basically a bad bank created by the government in the mould of an asset reconstruction company.

The NARCL will pick up bad loans above a certain threshold from banks and would aim to sell them to prospective buyers of distressed debt. The NARCL will also be responsible for valuing bad loans to determine at what price they would be sold. The bad bank would provide government receipts to banks as it takes on non-performing assets from their books.

State-owned banks will hold 51% stake, while FIs or debt management companies will hold 49%.

What is IDRCL?

Along with NARCL, the government will also set up the India Debt Resolution Company Ltd (IDRCL). The IDRCL is a service company or an operational entity, which will manage assets and loop in market professionals and turnaround experts. Public Sector Banks (PSBs) and Public FIs will hold a maximum of 49% stake and the rest will be with private sector lenders.

Background

Last year, The Indian Banks’ Association had proposed to create a bad bank for swift resolution of non-performing assets (NPAs). Following this, the finance minister in the 2021-22 Union Budget proposed the setting up of an ARC, along with an Asset Management Company (AMC), to take over the stressed debt of banks.

During the Union Budget 2021-22, Sitharaman said the bad bank will manage and dispose the assets to alternate investment funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation.

In August, IBA moved an application to the RBI seeking licence to set up the over Rs 6,000-crore bad bank. The NARCL was incorporated last month in Mumbai, following the registration with the Registrar of Companies.

Also read: Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore on securities receipts

The Plan

The government will not have any direct equity contribution to NARCL. It will guarantee securities receipts issued by NARCL, which will buy the bad loans from banks.

These receipts will be valid for five years, and condition precedent for invocation of guarantee will be resolution or liquidation.

NARCL is intended to resolve stressed loan assets above Rs 500 crore each, amounting to about Rs 2 lakh crore. In phase I, fully provisioned assets of about Rs 90,000 crore are expected to be transferred to NARCL, while the remaining assets with lower provisions would be transferred in phase II.

As per industry practice, it will pay up to 15% of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85% would be securities receipts.

The NARCL will acquire assets by making an offer to the lead bank. Once NARCL’s offer is accepted, IDRCL will be looped in for management and value addition.

How is NARCL different from existing ARCs?

The proposed bad bank will have a public sector character and majority ownership is likely to rest with state-owned banks.

At present, ARCs typically seek a steep discount on loans. With the NARCL, the valuation issue is unlikely to come up since this is a government initiative.

The government-backed ARC will have deep pockets to buy out big accounts, and thereby free up banks from carrying these accounts on their books.

Watch: Bad bank can be only a warehouse of bad assets, says Siby Antony

What benefit do banks get from this new structure?

It will incentivize quicker action on resolving stressed assets, and help in better value realisation. This approach will also permit freeing up banks personnel to focus on increasing business and credit growth.

As holders of these stressed assets and securities receipts, banks will receive the gains. Further, it aims to bring improvement in banks’ valuations and enhance their ability to raise market capital.

Watch: Bad bank to preserve value, timely sale of stressed assets: IBA CEO



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finance Minister Sitharaman announces bad bank, Cabinet approves backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore on securities receipts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman today announced the much-awaited bad bank, and said that the Union Cabinet approved on Wednesday the sovereign backing of up to Rs 30,600 crore for the securities receipts.

The planned National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) will issue securities receipts to banks as it takes on non-performing assets from their books. These securities receipts will be valid for five years.

“The idea behind it is to ensure value locked within assets is used making banking system robust. So limit provides an incentive for banks. If process delayed beyond 5 years, guarantee can’t be invoked,” Sitharaman said.

Read: What is a bad bank and why is it needed?

The NARCL will pay up to 15% of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85% would be government-guaranteed security receipts, the finance minister announced. State-owned banks will hold 51% stake, while FIs or debt management companies will hold 49%.

Financial Services Secretary Debasish Panda said the government will not face any fiscal outgo for the guarantees it provides to banks. NPAs worth Rs 2 lakh crore will be sent to the NARCL, and of this Rs 90,000 crore will be transferred in the first phase.

Along with NARCL, the government will also set up an India Debt Resolution company. The service company will manage assets and loop in market professionals and turnaround experts. Public sector banks and public FIs will hold a maximum of 49% stake and the remaining will be held by private banks.

Watch: Bad bank can only be a warehouse of bad assets, says Siby Antony

The banks’ asset quality review had happened in 2015, which had revealed very high incidence of NPAs. After recognition, quantification of NPAs started in a planned manner and state owned banks, in the last six years, recovered Rs 5,01,479 crore, she said.

In 2018, just two out of 21 public sector banks were profitable. But in 2021, only two banks reported losses, Sitharaman added.

Watch: Bad bank to preserve value, timely sale of stressed assets: IBA CEO

During the Union Budget 2021-22, Sitharaman had announced the creation of NARCL or bad bank to resolve large cases of stress. The bad bank will manage and dispose the assets to alternate investment funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation, she had said.

In August, the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) moved an application to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) seeking licence to set up a the Rs 6,000-crore bad bank. The NARCL was incorporated last month in Mumbai, following the registration with Registrar of Companies.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IBA moves RBI seeking licence to set up 6k-cr NARCL, nod likely soon, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: The Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) has moved an application to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) seeking licence to set up a Rs 6,000-crore National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) or bad bank, according to sources.

NARCL was incorporated last month in Mumbai following the registration with Registrar of Companies (RoC).

According to sources, the company after mobilising an initial capital of Rs 100 crore and fulfilling other legal formalities has approached the RBI seeking licence to undertake asset reconstruction business.

The RBI in 2017, raised the capital requirement to Rs 100 crore from the earlier level of Rs 2 crore, keeping in mind the higher amount of cash required to buy bad loans.

RBI has its process and procedure for granting licence for such business, sources said, adding, it could take next few weeks to obtain licence from the regulator.

RBI’s approval could come either in September or October, sources added.

Legal consultant AZB & Partners has been engaged to seek various regulatory approvals and fulfilling other legal formalities.

IBA, entrusted with the task of setting up a bad bank, has put a preliminary board for NARCL in place. The company has hired P M Nair, a stressed assets expert from State Bank of India (SBI), as the managing director.

The other directors on the board are IBA Chief Executive Sunil Mehta, SBI Deputy Managing Director S S Nair and Canara Bank’s Chief General Manager Ajit Krishnan Nair.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Budget 2021-22, announced that the high level of provisioning by public sector banks of their stressed assets calls for measures to clean up bank books.

“An Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Asset Management Company would be set up to consolidate and take over the existing stressed debt,” she had said in the Budget Speech. It will manage and dispose the assets to alternative investment funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation, she had said. ba



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3