Dhanlaxmi Bank shareholders reject appointment of statutory auditors

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Shareholders approved the ‘Profit &Loss Account’ for the year ended and the re-appointment CK Gopinathan as a director.

Shareholders of Dhanlaxmi Bank have rejected the appointment of statutory central auditors in the annual general meeting (AGM) held on Wednesday, the bank said in a regulatory filing. Incidentally, the Kerala High Court has refrained the bank from concluding the AGM and has adjourned it to a day after one month from September 29th.
The shareholders also rejected the resolution of authorizing the board of directors to appoint and fix the remuneration of branch auditors.

In a show of strength and defiance to the current board, the shareholders passed two resolutions while voting against the other two. Shareholders approved the ‘Profit &Loss Account’ for the year ended and the re-appointment CK Gopinathan as a director.

According to the regulatory filing, 65.44% of the shareholders present in the AGM voted against the proposal to appoint P B Vijayaraghavan & Co, Chartered Accountants, as statutory auditors and appointment of branch auditors.
The order by the HC came following a writ petition filed by KN Madhusoodanan, a shareholder of the company, P Mohanan and Prakash DL, seeking a direction to the respondents — the RBI and Dhanlaxmi bank — to discharge their statutory responsibilities under Section 160 of the Companies Act to inform the members about the candidature of the petitioners for the office of the director as mandated under Section 160(2) of the Companies Act.
Sherry Samuel Oommen, a corporate lawyer, told FE that it would have augured well for the shareholders of Dhanlaxmi to adjourn the AGM in its totality.

“The Ministry of Corporate Affairs in a circular in 1974 had permitted companies to adjourn the AGM where accounts were not ready for laying at the concerned AGM. Perhaps, in the interests of the public, the matter concerning adoption of accounts and appointment of auditors could have been adjourned to the ensuing AGM. I am quite certain that this matter would be further litigated in the next month,”he added.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Govt considers operational changes in IBC following expert panel recommendations, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India is considering several operational changes in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), harnessing digital technology to help remove seemingly insurmountable obstacles of distance or time – and speed up the resolution of bad loans.

The Indian Institute of Insolvency Professional of ICAI (IIIPI), which constituted a study group, has recommended greater adoption of digital modes, such as holding virtual meetings of courts and CoC (committee of creditors) and deploying AI (Artificial Intelligence), even after eventual restoration of normality due to the time-saving benefits of digital technology.

Under the aegis of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), IIIPI regulates insolvency professionals, who play a key role in the execution of bankruptcy resolution plans. It has submitted a set of recommendations made by the study group to the ministry of corporate affairs and IBBI.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs did not respond to ET’s mailed query.

“In addition to sprucing up the infrastructure, the NCLT should consider continuing ‘virtual courts’ even after normalcy restores,” IIIPI said in a note viewed by ET. “In virtual courts, senior officials can participate without travelling from remote offices, which helps in fast decision making and reduces pendency.”

It is necessary to learn from every crisis, which is what the said report seems to be doing on recommending best practices.

Virtual meetings during Covid restrictions, according to IIIPI’s study, resulted in quick decision making as senior officials used to participate.

“This should be continued as a ‘best practice’ even after normalcy resumes,” said the note.

Dewan Housing Finance (DHFL) is a classic case in point. The troubled non-banking finance company, for which the government amended the law to bring it under the IBC, has finally been sold. The resolution process ended successfully, albeit after multiple litigations.

The study group report by the largest body of insolvency professionals also urged the authorities to nip in the bud the menace of frivolous cases, often intended to cause delays in resolutions.

Section 60(5)(a) of IBC gives NCLT the jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of any application or proceeding by or against the corporate debtor or corporate person.

This may be amended to restrict and specify the grounds on which any applicant can approach NCLT for rectifying grievances. IBBI is urged to take up the issue on priority, said one of the recommendations in the report.

DHFL received about 40-50 cases challenging decisions by either the central bank-appointed administrator or the CoC.

“Artificial Intelligence (AI) based facilities should be used for people tracing, asset tracing and transaction tracing,” it recommended.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Hold crypto assets? Here’s how you are going to pay income-tax on it, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A cryptocurrency is a decentralised digital asset and a medium of exchange. Bitcoin was the world’s first crypto currency launched in 2009. It was created by a software developer under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Based on blockchain technology, over 1,500 virtual currencies such as Litecoin, Ripple, Ethereum and Dogecoin are being actively used and traded globally today.

The cryptocurrency space in India has been subject to significant regulatory challenges. It started with a circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India on 6th April 2018, which restricted banking facilities from being offered to participants involved in cryptocurrency transactions. In March 2020, the Supreme Court set aside the RBI circular, on constitutional grounds and affirmed the virtual currency exchanges’ fundamental right to trade. It is estimated that around 5 million traders in India traded across 24 exchanges, with trading volumes in the range of 1,500 Bitcoins a day translating to a volume of Rs 1 billion. According to moneycontrol.com, the trading volume of cryptocurrency in India increased by 400 percent during the nationwide lockdown.

On 24th March, 2021, in what could possibly mark the first move by the government to regulate cryptocurrencies and related transactions in India, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has made it mandatory for companies dealing with virtual currencies to disclose profit or loss incurred on crypto transactions and the amount of crypto currency they hold in their balance sheets at the reporting date. These amendments were made in schedule III of the Companies Act with effect from April 1, 2021.

The Indian income tax law is still unclear regarding the tax impact on the gains earned from cryptocurrencies. It is worthwhile to note that India’s tax authorities have not yet categorized returns from cryptocurrencies under any specific bracket and there have been no judicial precedents in this regard.

To understand the taxability of the cryptocurrencies, one should examine the classification of cryptocurrency i.e. is it currency or goods/property?

How are tax cryptocurrency transactions in other countries?
USA: The Internal Revenue Service in 2014 decided cryptocurrencies should be treated as “property”, meaning they should be taxed as capital assets other than in situations when cryptos are earned from mining activities.

Singapore: Businesses that trade virtual currencies in the course of their business are taxed on profits as business income. Entities holding cryptocurrencies for long-term investment purposes are not taxed as there is no capital gains tax in Singapore.

UK: If a person buys and sells crypto assets with such frequency, level of organisation and sophistication that the activity amounts to a financial trade, then it will be taxed as trading profit/losses, else it will be subject to capital gains tax.

Taxation of cryptocurrency transactions in India
If cryptocurrency is to be classified as currency, then the said transaction will not be exigible to taxation under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“ITA”). Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as currency by the RBI and the word ‘income’ as defined under section 2(24) of the ITA provides an inclusive list not covering ‘money’ or ‘currency’. On the other hand, if cryptocurrency is considered as property/goods, then it would fall under the heads of either ‘Capital Gains’ or ‘Profit and Gains from Business or Profession’.

The fact that crypto currency gains will be taxed is now certain with the Minister of State for Finance, Mr. Anurag Singh Thakur clarifying on 28th March 2021 that “the gains resulting from the transfer of cryptocurrencies / assets are subject to tax under a head of income, depending upon the nature of holding of the same”.

Thus, it is settled that cryptocurrencies will not be treated as currency by India and will be exigible to tax. The key issue is whether income from virtual currency is treated as capital gains or business income. If a seller is a trader by occupation, the income should be taxed as business income. If it is not business income, such income would be taxed in the nature of capital gains.

Taxability under ‘Capital Gains’
Crypto currency can be deemed to be a capital asset if it is purchased for the purpose of investment by a taxpayer. As per Section 2(14) of the ITA, a capital asset means a property of any kind held by a person, whether or not connected with his business or profession. The term ‘property’, though has no statutory meaning, yet it signifies every possible interest which a person can acquire, hold or enjoy. Therefore, any gain arising out of the transfer of cryptocurrency may be considered as capital gains, if it is held for investment.

Infrequent crypto transactions could be treated as long or short-term capital gains, depending on the holding period. If investors hold cryptocurrencies for 36 months or more, the gains would be taxable as long-term capital gains, and if less than 36 months, it would be short-term capital gains. Short-term capital gains are taxable as per the slab rates applicable to a taxpayer. And long-term capital gains are taxed at the flat rate of 20% with the benefit of indexation.

Taxability under ‘Profit and Gains from Business or Profession’:
However, if the transactions are substantial and frequent, it could be held that the taxpayer is trading in cryptocurrencies and any profits thereon would be taxable as business income. Similarly, if cryptocurrencies are held as ‘stock in trade’, then income arising therefrom will attract tax under business income. Therefore, the continuous activity of trading in cryptocurrencies and profits realized will be taxable as business income. Although a position can be taken by the revenue authorities that such trading is treated as speculation income which would adversely impact taxpayers.

In conclusion, virtual currencies can boost India’s digital infrastructure and reduce banks’ infrastructure costs attributable to cross-border payments, securities trading and regulatory compliance. We still need clarity from the government on cryptocurrency taxation, particularly on issues such as treatment of capital gains or business income, classification as speculative income, allowability of set-off, and carry-forward of losses, and applicability of deemed gift tax provisions.

(The author, Harsh Bhuta, is a Partner at Bhuta Shah and Co LLP. The views are his own)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Friction over newer compliances rising between auditors, regulators, firms, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After banks and auditors opposed the introduction of joint audit norms, it’s the turn of the Securities and Exchange Board of India‘s recent rules on due diligence by alternative investment funds that are causing consternation.

The market regulator’s recent rules require alternative investment funds to conduct in-depth due diligence of their portfolio companies. According to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2021, which came into effect on May 5, the regulator has mandated that fund managers conduct this due diligence to make sure their house is in order.

The regulations mainly impact the private equity and venture capital funds that are registered under the Alternative Investment Funds Categories 1 & 2 and hedge funds registered under the AIF Category 3 in India.

The fund managers and trustees will have to ensure that detailed policies and procedures are in place for investments and that provisions over confidentiality, conflict of interest, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and addressing investor complaints are complied with.

The PPM (private placement memorandum) will be required to check on the detailed policy and procedures as well as the compliance with the code of conduct prescribed under the newly added fourth schedule. The format for reporting requirements to Sebi and trustees could also undergo a change. The new regulations would likely require funds to share the report or the procedures with the auditors.

The due diligence will have to be undertaken at the fund level as well as the investment level.

Fund managers will also have to realign investments to comply with the new regulations, as Sebi has put a threshold on the money a fund can invest in a company or another investment vehicle.

The RBI regulations

On April 27, the RBI released new guidelines for statutory auditors of financial entities to enhance the independence of auditors and tackle concentration issues. The guidelines require mandatory rotation of auditors after three years with a six-year cooling-off period, and appointment of joint auditors in entities having asset size of Rs 15,000 crore and above.

The regulations ran into opposition from bankers and auditors who wanted it to be deferred citing less time to appoint auditors and crunch. The new guidelines have come in at the end of April. We have to evaluate how we can sort of look at appointing new auditors so quickly.

Because the RBI guidelines say that existing auditors cannot continue (auditing) if they have done three years. I think in the case of most companies (non-bank lenders), the auditors would have already done more than three years, probably done four years… So, I hope that RBI defers this applicability by year or so because the year has already started, and a lot of them would have to start looking around for new audit firms,” Keki Mistry, MD and Vice Chairman Keki Mistry had told ETCFO.

“Many challenges here if implemented from FY22. Some bank auditors have already finished three years — they will only have weeks to make a new selection. The pool available to choose from will be limited for FY22 and many potential suitors would be conflicted under the new one-year cooling-off period having done such non-audit services in FY21,” Grant Thornton Bharat CEO Vishesh Chandiok had said.

Audit trail software

Earlier this year, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had to defer by a year amendments to the companies accounts rules requiring firms to use accounting software that include features that can record the audit trail of each transaction.

Companies and auditors had cited little time left for the fiscal to end for them to shift to another software.

The second amendment to the Companies Accounts Rules, 2014, made the previous changes effective from April 1, 2022, according to the notification. The ministry had made the changes, to be effective from the start of the current fiscal, with the objective of curbing backdated entries by firms in the books of accounts.

“…for the financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April 2021, every company which uses accounting software for maintaining its books of account, shall use only such accounting software which has a feature of recording audit trail of each and every transaction, creating an edit log of each change made in books of account along with the date when such changes were made and ensuring that the audit trail cannot be disabled,” the amendment made on March 25 had said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI earmarks Rs 30 crore to set up makeshift hospitals for COVID patients, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As part of the CSR initiative, the country’s largest lender State Bank of India has decided to set up makeshift hospitals with ICU facilities for COVID-19 patients in some of the worst affected states. The bank has already earmarked Rs 30 crore and is engaging with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and hospital management for setting up medical facilities on an emergency basis for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, SBI Chairman Dinesh Kumar Khara told .

He said the bank intends to put in place 1,000 beds with 50 ICU facilities in the states that are the worst affected.

So, he said, it could be 120 beds at some places, while 150 at others with adequate healthcare facilities, depending on a hospital’s capacity to scale up.

It is to be noted that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs last week permitted makeshift hospitals and temporary COVID care facilities to be treated as an eligible Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activity.

India is reeling under the impact of the second wave of COVID-19 with over 3 lakh cases being reported for the past 8 days in a row. With each passing day, the death toll is rising.

The country witnessed a record single-day rise of 3,79,257 new coronavirus infections pushing the total tally of COVID-19 cases to 1,83,76,524, while active cases crossed the 30-lakh mark, according to the Union Health Ministry data updated on Thursday.

Speaking about various initiatives taken by the country’s largest lender in its fight against COVID-19, Khara said SBI is also collaborating with hospitals and NGOs to provide oxygen concentrators for the patients.

“We have put in place an action plan. We have earmarked Rs 70 crore plus out of which we are giving Rs 21 crore to 17 circles for COVID-19 related initiatives,” he said.

Last year, the bank had donated to the Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations (PM CARES) Fund. SBI had contributed 0.25 per cent of annual profit, while employees collected over Rs 100 crore for the fund. In addition, Rs 11 crore contribution was towards supporting vaccination drive.

For the safety of employees and their families, he said, the bank has tied up with hospitals across the country to facilitate treatment of those who have fallen sick on a priority basis.

“We are also ensuring the supply of important medicines etc. so that the staff are not put to inconvenience. Various teams of medical officers are active at Local Head Offices and Zonal Offices, to oversee and coordinate COVID-19 support activities in the area under their jurisdiction,” he said.

A quick response team (QRT) headed by a general manager at the corporate centre is monitoring the COVID position at the entire bank-level and providing assistance at the shortest possible timeframe, he added.

With regard to vaccination, Khara said, the bank has collaborated with various hospitals for the jab.

“So far, 70,000 staff have been vaccinated out of 2.5 lakh. We are closely monitoring this number and this is expected to go up post-May 1 when it will be opened for all beyond 18 years,” he said.

The bank has decided to bear the cost of vaccination for its employees and their dependent family members. In case of unfortunate death of employees, he said, it is very difficult to replace the loss but some assistance is being provided immediately.

“We have also liberalised appointments on compassionate ground as part of assistance to dependents of those who have lost their life due to this pandemic,” he said.

The bank pays an ex-gratia lump sum amount of Rs 20 lakh to the family of the employee who dies due to COVID-19 infection.

At the same time, Khara said, the bank is sensitive to the health of its customers.

The bank has been doing customer awareness campaigns on digital banking amid pandemic, he said, adding local level engagements of distributing hand sanitisers, masks, PPE kits, donation of ambulances, etc are being undertaken.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY