PayPal heats up buy now, pay later race with $2.7 billion Japan deal, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


FILE PHOTO: The PayPal logo is seen at an office building in Berlin, Germany, March 5, 2019. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch

US payments giant PayPal Holdings Inc said it would acquire Japanese buy now, pay later (BNPL) firm Paidy in a $2.7 billion largely cash deal, taking another step to claim the top spot in an industry witnessing a pandemic-led boom.

The deal tracks rival Square Inc’s agreement last month to buy Australian BNPL success story Afterpay Ltd for $29 billion, which experts said was likely the beginning of a consolidation in the sector.

The BNPL business model has been hugely successful during the pandemic, fuelled by federal stimulus checks, and upended consumer credit markets.

These alternative credit firms make money by charging merchants a fee to offer small point-of-sale loans which shoppers repay in interest-free instalments, bypassing credit checks.

Heavyweights like Apple Inc and Goldman Sachs are the latest heavyweights that have been reported to be readying a version of the service.

Paypal, already considered a leader in the BNPL market, also entered Australia last year, raising the stakes for smaller companies such as Sezzle Inc and Z1P.AX Co Ltd, stocks of which were down in midday trading on Wednesday.

“The acquisition will expand PayPal’s capabilities, distribution and relevance in the domestic payments market in Japan, the third largest ecommerce market in the world, complementing the company’s existing cross-border ecommerce business in the country,” PayPal said in a statement on Tuesday.

After the acquisition, Paidy will continue to operate its existing business and maintain its brand. Founder and Chairman Russell Cummer and President and Chief Executive Riku Sugie will continue to hold their roles in the company, PayPal said.

The Financial Times had reported last month that Paidy was considering becoming a publicly listed company.

The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2021, and will be minimally dilutive to PayPal’s adjusted earnings per share in 2022.

BofA Securities was the sole financial adviser to PayPal on the deal, and White & Case was lead legal adviser. Goldman Sachs advised Paidy, and Cooley LLP and Mori Hamada & Matsumoto provided it legal counsel.

(Reporting by Anirudh Saligrama in Bengaluru; Writing by Sayantani Ghosh; Editing by Ramakrishnan M. And Kim Coghill)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

DICGC Act amendment may encourage merger of weak UCBs with stronger banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


To facilitate the reconstruction of a weak bank or its amalgamation with another bank, the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) can henceforth defer or vary the time limit for receipt of repayments due to it from the insured bank or the transferee bank.

The aforementioned clause has probably been incorporated in the DICGC (Amendment) Act, 2021, so the monies the Corporation pays (up to the deposit insurance limit of ₹5 lakh per depositor) to the depositors of sick banks under “direction, prohibition, order or scheme (of amalgamation)” can be recovered at a later date.

This may encourage the takeover of weak banks, especially in the urban co-operative banking sector, by stronger banks.

Since April 1, 2015, 52 weak urban co-operative banks (UCBs), including the Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative Bank (Mumbai), Kapol Co-operative Bank (Mumbai), Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank (Bengaluru), and Rupee Co-operative Bank (Pune), have been placed under All Inclusive Directions (AID), according to the Reserve Bank of India’s latest annual report.

“The Corporation may defer or vary the time limit for receipt of repayments due to it from the insured bank or the transferee bank (into which transferor bank is amalgamated), as the case may be, for such period and upon such terms, as may be decided by the Board in accordance with the regulations made in this behalf,” per the amendment.

Before deciding on the aforementioned course of action, DICGC’s Board will “assess the capability of the bank to make repayment to the Corporation and for prohibition of specified other classes of liabilities from being discharged by the insured bank or the transferee bank till such time as repayment is made to the Corporation”.

Encourage amalgamation of sick UCBs

This important amendment to the DICGC Act coupled with the amendment to Section 45 of the Banking Regulation (BR) Act (enabling RBI to reconstruct — including via mergers, acquisitions and takeovers or demergers — or amalgamate a bank, with or without implementing a moratorium, with the approval of the Central Government) should augur well for the UCB sector, aiding reconstruction/amalgamation of weak banks.

As per the ‘Amalgamation of Urban Cooperative Banks, Directions, 2020’, issued in March 2021 by RBI, it may consider proposals for merger and amalgamation among UCBs under three circumstances, including when the net worth of the amalgamated bank is positive, and the amalgamating bank assures to protect entire deposits of all depositors of the amalgamated bank.

The second circumstance for considering proposals are when the net worth of amalgamated bank is negative, and the amalgamating bank, on its own, assures to protect deposits of the depositors of the amalgamated bank.

The third circumstance is when the net worth of the amalgamated bank is negative and the amalgamating bank assures to protect the deposits of all depositors of the amalgamated bank, with the financial support from the State government extended upfront as part of the merger.

RBI’s annual report has emphasised that speeding up the resolution of weak UCBs which are under AID is an ongoing process and the possibilities of using amended provisions of the BR Act are under examination.

If the restrictions on payment to depositors are removed by the RBI at any time before payment to depositors by the Corporation, and the insured bank or the transferee bank is in a position to make payments to its depositors on demand without any restrictions, the Corporation shall not be liable to make payment to the depositors of such insured bank, per the amendment.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY