New global rules leave just 10 big EU banks short of capital, draft shows, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


* Capital shortfall seen at less than 27 bln euros

* Basel III directive also tackles climate change, branches

FRANKFURT, – Only 10 major European banks may need to raise capital as a result of the rollout of new global rules and their shortfall could be smaller than 27 billion euros ($31.43 billion), according to draft European Union regulation seen by Reuters.

The impact would be much smaller than the 52.2 billion euros estimated by the European Banking Authority (EBA) last year, a sigh of relief for a sector that has been plagued by low profits for a decade and is still recovering from a pandemic-induced recession.

The draft of European Commission‘s Basel III directive, which transposes the final batch of global rules aimed at avoiding a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis, put the increase to EU banks’ minimum capital requirements at between 0.7% and 2.7% by 2015 and 6.4%-8.4% by 2030.

“According to estimates provided by the EBA, this impact could lead a limited number of large EU banks (10 out of 99 banks in the test sample) to have to raise collectively… less than 27 billion euros,” the Commission said in the document.

The EBA said the banks in the test sample were from 17 EU countries and represented around 75% of total EU banks’ assets.

Banks had lobbied for a more flexible interpretation of the “output floor”, which limits their discretion in setting their own capital requirement, but their wishes were not fulfilled.

The European Parliament will have the final say on approving the rules, but regulators have warned the bloc not to stray from the standards already agreed at a global level.

The directive, which is due to be published next week, also gives supervisors the power to impose requirements relating to climate risk and contains stricter rules for branches of foreign banks in the EU.

This gives extra legal backing to the European Central Bank, which has been putting pressure on banks to disclose and tackle risks relating to climate change, such as weather hazards and changes in regulation.

As regards foreign branches, which had assets worth 510 billion euros at the end of last year and are concentrated in Belgium, France, Germany and Luxembourg, they will now be subject to a common authorisation procedure.

They will also have to comply with requirements relating to their capital, liquidity, governance and risk management, the draft shows. ($1 = 0.8591 euros) (Reporting by Huw Jones, Writing By Francesco Canepa in Frankfurt, Editing by Alex Richardson)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Luxembourg is route of choice for FPIs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Even as investments through participatory notes (P-Notes) have come down due to stringent regulation, the number of foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) routing money through tax havens such as Luxembourg has gone up significantly.

According to data available with market regulator SEBI, there has been a 10-fold rise in FPIs originating from Luxembourg in nearly a decade.

Luxembourg, Europe’s famous tax jurisdiction and home to thousands of ghost companies operating without employees and offices, is the second most favoured destination after the US for FPIs registered in India.

 

The number of Luxembourg-based FPIs has risen from around 100 in 2012 to 1,143 in March 2020. These Luxembourg FPIs held equity and debt assets worth ₹2,30,500 crore last year. The assets had increased to ₹3,53,541 crore towards the end of January 2021.

“Countries like Luxembourg offer secrecy and it’s not easy to figure ultimate beneficiaries of investment vehicles there. It is highly likely that some Luxembourg FPIs are used by Indian promoters, politicians and others for money laundering or round tripping,” said Shriram Subramanian, founder, InGovern, a proxy advisor.

In 2012, when SEBI started revealing data on FPI origination, there were a total of 1,754 registered foreign funds with 6,322 sub-accounts that were nothing but entities on whose behalf the funds were invested. These sub-accounts mainly used P-Notes to hide the identity of ultimate beneficiary investors playing in Indian markets. As the din over ban on P-Notes grew louder and SEBI relaxed norms on FPI registrations, most sub-accounts converted into FPIs. But destinations like Luxembourg and other tax havens still offer them the same secrecy of P-Notes, experts say.

FPIs originating from just three large tax havens including Luxembourg, Mauritius and Singapore are contributing around a third of India’s stock market flows.

The number of FPIs registered in Mauritius has increased by over six times from 101 in 2012 to 608 while those in Singapore have increased almost 6 times from 75 to 434.

‘OpenLux Investigation’

Recently, French daily Le Monde and few other news outlets published an investigation report known as the ‘OpenLux Investigation’ that has now opened the Pandora’s box for Luxembourg as it reveals how funds suspected of criminal activities were concealed in the country. Transparency International, whch tracks financial crimes and corruption cases, has said that nearly 80 per cent of Luxembourg private investment funds may be laundered dirty cash.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY