How to report cryptocurrency gains, losses in income tax return, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Cryptocurrency, or “crypto” or “tokens”, is all the rage right now. People are buying and using cryptos for varied purposes. Some mine it, that is earn cryptocurrency by solving cryptographic equations with the use of high-power computers, while some use it for buying goods and services, and some even invest in it with a view to earn profits on appreciation of these cryptos or a combination of all the options. Be that as it may, it is important to understand that there could be an “income” on such dealings, and this could be subject to tax.

So, under what head would these transactions need to be reported as each head has its own computational provisions, tax rates, set-off and carry-forward of loss provisions, reporting requirements etc.?

While currently, there are no specific guidance/specific tax provisions on taxation of cryptos in the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), one could draw inference from the general principles of taxation and tax the transactions based on the purpose for which they are used to report the gains and losses in the income tax return (ITR).

One should keep in mind that not reporting transactions in cryptocurrencies in one’s ITR can lead to penal consequences, and in some cases, there could be a risk of prosecution.

Here is a look at how one can report crypto transactions in one’s ITR.

Reporting of cryptocurrency transactions
A taxpayer would have to report transactions related to cryptocurrency as business income if held as stock in trade, or capital gains if held as investments. If reported as business income, then ITR-3 form will be applicable to an individual in FY 2020-21, whereas if it is reported as capital gains from investment, then the individual would have to use ITR-2.

Taxability under business income/capital gains

  • Taxability as capital gains: If cryptos are held as investments, then it could be argued that the profit/loss on such sale needs to be reported as capital gains/loss. If the cryptos are held for more than 36 months, then the gain thereon could be classified as long-term capital gains and be subject to tax at 20%, plus applicable surcharge and cess. Else, they could be classified as short-term capital gains, subject to tax at the applicable personal taxation rates. For long-term capital gains, indexation benefit could be availed to increase the cost on account of inflation.
  • Taxability as business income: If cryptos are held as stock-in-trade, then it could be taxed under the head business income. The income (net of expenses like purchase cost for cryptos, depreciation on computers/laptops, salary, rental expense, cost for maintenance of accounts etc.) from such activity of trading could be taxed as business income. As mentioned above, for individuals having business income, the prescribed ITR Form, i.e., ITR-3 is to be used (in which case, accounts are required to be audited after specified threshold is crossed). Business income is taxed as per the prevailing slab rates (assuming non-presumptive basis of taxation), plus applicable surcharge and cess.

How to report in ITR-2/ITR-3
If cryptos are treated as investment, then long-term capital gains on sale of cryptos would need to be reported under CG schedule of ITR -2/ ITR-3 (if there are sources of business income), it will be reported under the head “From sale of assets where B1 to B8/B9 above are not applicable” for FY 2020-21. Short-term capital gains on sale of cryptos would need to be reported in CG schedule of ITR-2/ITR-3 for FY2020-21, under “STCG on assets other than at A1 or A2 or A3 or A4 or A5 above”. Further, the return of income needs to be filed before the due date to claim carry-forward of capital losses, if any, for set-off in subsequent 8 years against earnings from capital gains.

On the other hand, if treated as business income, then sale of cryptos needs to be reported in Part A -Trading account under “Sale of goods” in ITR-3. The net profit/loss from sale of cryptos after reducing the permissible expenses, needs to be reported under the head, “Net profit before taxes”.

For loss incurred in cryptocurrency transactions, the return of income needs to be filed within the due date (July 31 of the year following the tax year, for an individual without any audit requirement, and October 31 following the tax year, if the individual is subject to a tax audit). For FY 2020-21, the aforesaid extended due dates are December 31, 2021 and February 15, 2022, respectively. If the loss is not a speculative loss, then such loss could be carried forward for 8 Assessment Years (‘AYs’) and set-off against business income.

Reporting of cryptocurrency holdings in ITR
If an individual qualifies as resident and ordinarily resident, there is a requirement to report foreign assets under schedule FA, “Details of Foreign Assets and Income from any source outside India” irrespective of income in the tax return.

However, do keep in mind that there are no clear guidelines from the tax authorities on whether cryptos are to be considered as a foreign asset. As cryptos are digital assets, the location where the server is located and the law of the land under which protection is sought could be treated as the location where these assets are located. If it is determined that cryptos are located outside India, then they need to be reported in schedule FA of the ITR.

Additional reporting requirement in ITR
Further, if the net taxable income of the individual exceeds Rs 50 lakh, Schedule AL of the ITR Form is also required to be filled. This schedule requires an individual to report his immovable assets, jewellery, bullion, etc., archaeological collections, drawings, painting, sculpture or any work of art, vehicles, yachts, boats and aircrafts, financial assets like bank balances, including deposits, shares and securities, insurance policies, loans and advances given, and cash in hand. Further, any liability in relation to such assets are also to be reported such as home loan taken for buying a house etc. Currently, there is no guidance on requirement to report cryptos in schedule AL of the currently notified ITR forms.

Penal consequences for not reporting cryptocurrencies in ITR
It must be noted that non-reporting/non-disclosure of these transactions could have various penal consequences. Some of the penal consequences are:
a) If foreign assets/income are not reported in the FA schedule (mandatory for every individual holding foreign assets irrespective of income), it could attract notice for assessment for up to 17 years under the Act.

b) Further, it can also attract various penal consequences under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015. Some of these are:
i) A penalty of Rs10 lakh under the provisions of the Black Money Act.
ii) Further, undisclosed foreign income or assets shall be taxed at the flat rate of 30 per cent. No exemption or deduction or set-off of any carried forward losses which may be admissible under the existing Income-tax Act, 1961, shall be allowed.
iii) The penalty for non-disclosure of income or an asset located outside India will be equal to three times the amount of tax payable thereon. This is in addition to tax payable at 30%.
iv) Further, there is a risk of prosecution.

Hence, it is imperative that individuals make proper reporting/disclosures in the tax returns they file and pay appropriate taxes on these transactions when such income is earned. Considering the widespread use of cryptos, and in the absence of guidance on taxability of cryptos, the government should consider coming out with necessary guidelines on taxability of cryptos and the reporting requirements.

(Homi Mistry is a Partner with Deloitte India. With inputs from Ajay Nahata, Senior Manager with Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Insurance frauds see an increase during pandemic, says survey

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Insurance frauds have increased during the Covid-19 pandemic and investigations have largely moved to digital channels, a new survey has revealed.

Significantly, more than one in four of the respondents or 27 per cent of those surveyed said insurance frauds have increased during the pandemic.

The findings are part of a survey on “Impact of Covid -19 Pandemic on Insurance Fraud Risk Mitigation and Investigation”, which was conducted by Insurance Institute of India with Lancers Network in collaboration with Association of Private Detectives and Investigators India and International Fraud Trading Group.

“There is also an overall increase in insurance fraud investigations after the onset of Covid-19, with 55 per cent of respondents confirming that their professional activities related to fraud-fighting have either increased overall or increased under a specific area of operation during the pandemic,” the report said.

About 68 per cent of the survey respondents said their organisations were already using digital solutions for investigations, while 19 per cent said they were in various stages of planning the transition to digital.

“The industry’s shift to digital fraud investigations is permanent, with 92 per cent of the respondents affirming that the increased use of technology in investigations would continue in the post-pandemic times. Of these, 71 per cent were specific that more emphasis would be on a digital approach,” it further said.

Significant losses

Insurance frauds are typically committed at the time of applications or claims and cost a whopping ₹45,000 crore every year to insurance companies. Nearly 70 per cent of these frauds are committed through false documents.

According to industry estimates, insurers lose close to 10 per cent of their overall premium collection to frauds.

“This survey confirms, the growing adoption of technologies like artificial intelligence and data analytics are enabling better and faster insurance investigations, which augurs well for the whole industry,” said Deepak Godbole, Secretary General, Insurance Institute of India.

The survey was conducted before the onset of the second wave of Covid-19 and reflects the views for the period from March 2020 till February 2021. Close to 60 industry executives representing various risk mitigation functions, including claims investigation, seeding, pre-issuance profile check, pay and recover, health reimbursement and underwriting participated in the survey.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Mallya/Nirav Modi fraud cases: Latest recovery of ₹1,850 cr redeems 58% of banks’ losses

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks have now recovered 58 per cent of the amount they were defrauded by Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi. While the SBI-led consortium got another ₹792.11 crore from sale of shares held in Mallya’s Kingfisher airline, other banks have got ₹1,060-crore assets from the Fugitive Economic Offences Court in the PNB-Nirav Modi Case

Total amount

The Enforcement Directorate on Friday said while the public sector banks were defrauded of ₹22,585.83 crore, recovery and transfer of assets as of date total ₹12,762.25 crore. The ED has attached assets worth ₹18,217.27 crore under the provision of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act from the three fugitives.

“Today, the SBI-led consortium has realised ₹792.11 crore by sale of shares in Kingfisher Airlines/Vijay Mallya case. These shares were handed over by the ED to the consortium. Earlier, SBI led consortium had realised ₹7,181.50 crore by liquidating assets handed over to it,” said an ED statement.

Earlier recovery

A few days back, the ED had handed over ₹3,728.64-crore assets to the SBI-led consortium including shares of ₹3,644.74 crore, Demand Draft of ₹54.33 crore and immovable properties worth ₹29.57 crore.

Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi are wanted by India for defrauding Punjab National Bank (PNB) of over ₹14,000 crore. They fled the country in January 2018 before their scam of using fake Letters of Undertakings (LoUs) to cheat the bank came to light.

Vijay Mallya had fled to the UK in 2016 after his Kingfisher Airlines collapsed. Mallya had borrowed to keep the consistently loss-making airline in air. By 2012, Kingfisher was declared an NPA by SBI. Accused of fraud and money laundering, Mallya owes 17 Indian banks about ₹9,000 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks may take up to $10-billion hit on Archegos loss: JPMorgan

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks roiled by the Archegos Capital fallout may see total losses in the range of $5 billion to $10 billion, according to JPMorgan.

Losses from trades unwinding related to Archegos will be “very material” in relation to lending exposure for a business that is mark-to-market and holds liquid collateral, analysts led by Kian Abouhossein wrote in a note. They added that Nomura Holdings Inc’s indication of potentially losing $2 billion and press speculation of a $3 billion to $4 billion loss at Credit Suisse AG is “not an unlikely outcome.”

Analysts and investors are trying to figure out the final losses to banks exposed to the Archegos implosion, with the task made harder by the opaque nature of the leveraged trading involved. JPMorgan had previously estimated losses in the range of $2 billion to $5 billion.

“We are still puzzled why Credit Suisse and Nomura have been unable to unwind all their positions at this point,” the analysts wrote, adding that they expect to see full disclosures from lenders by the end of this week.

Credit Suisse Girds for Billions in Losses From Archegos Hit

The analysts advised investors to keep an eye on credit agencies statements as they expect poor risk management to be an issue.

That’s an emerging theme at Credit Suisse, where executives are expecting the loss related to Archego to run into the billions, according to people with knowledge of the matter. March’s blowups may wipe out more than a year of profits for the bank and threaten its stock buyback plans, as well as adding to the reputational hit from other missteps.

The bank’s plans to buy back 1.5 billion Swiss francs ($1.6 billion) of shares are at risk, according to Berenberg analyst Eoin Mullany. He estimates the lender could face losses of $3 billion to $4 billion.

“The hits just keep coming for Credit Suisse,” he wrote in a note Mullany.

Preceding the Archegos losses were the liquidation of its supply-chain finance funds linked to collapsed financier Lex Greensill and a writedown on a stake in hedge fund York Capital Management taken in the fourth quarter.

The buyback programme resumed in January after having been suspended for nearly a year due to the pandemic.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY