LIC further relaxes claim settlement process

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Amidst the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic surging across the country, Life Insurance Corporation of India has further relaxed processes for settlement of claims.

To facilitate speedy settlement of death claims in the prevailing situation where death has occurred in a hospital, LIC will accept alternate proofs of death instead of a death certificate issued by the municipal authorities.

Alternate proofs of death would include death certificate, discharge summary or death summary containing clear date and time of death issued by the government, ESI, Armed Forces or corporate hospitals and counter-signed by LIC class I officers or Development Officers of 10 years standing along with the cremation or burial certificate or authentic identifying receipt issued by the relevant authority.

“In other cases, Municipal Death Certificate will be required as earlier,” LIC said in a statement on Friday.

Life certificates

For Annuities with return of capital options, production of life certificates is waived for annuities due up to October 21 this year, it further said.

LIC would also accept life certificates sent through email in other cases and has introduced life certificate procurement through video call process.

To address the difficulties experienced by policyholders in submitting documents required for claim settlement in servicing branch, submission of documents has been allowed in any nearby LIC office.

LIC further said that starting May 10, all its offices will work from Monday to Friday between 10 am and 5:30 pm. Saturdays will be a public holiday for LIC.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

AIBEA opposes govt decision to privatise IDBI Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has opposed the government’s move to privatise IDBI Bank, terming the decision as a “retrograde” move. The association said the government should control a minimum of 51 per cent share capital of the bank.

The bank came into trouble as some private corporate houses cheated IDBI Bank by not repaying the loans taken, while the need of the hour is to take action against the defaulters and recover the money, the bank union said in a statement.

The Cabinet on Wednesday gave in-principle approval for strategic disinvestment along with transfer of management control in IDBI Bank in line with the Budget announcement earlier this year.

The central government and LIC together own more than 94 per cent equity of IDBI Bank.

“The need is to take action on the defaulters and recover the money. Unfortunately, now the decision has been taken to sell the bank to a private company. IDBI Bank is a national asset and should not be sold away in this fashion. It is a retrograde move,” AIBEA said.

If sold to a private company, the existing reservation in jobs for SC/ST category will be withdrawn, it said, adding this is social injustice to the unemployed youth of this country.

The only major problem of the bank is its huge bad loans of Rs 36,000 crore as of March 31, 2021 (22 per cent). Out of the operating profit of Rs 1,900 crore for the year ended March 2021, Rs 1,500 crore have been set off for provision for bad loans, AIBEA Secretary General C H Venkatachalam said.

“Now to camouflage these ills of the bank, the bank is being sold away. We express our strong protest against this decision and urge upon the government not to proceed with the sale of IDBI Bank,” he said.

AIBEA said bank’s deposits of Rs 2.3 lakh crore is people’s money and it should be used for their welfare and national development, not for the private corporate loot.

IDBI was started as a Development Financial Institution (DFI) in the 1960s. It was later converted as IDBI Bank much against the statute approved by Parliament earlier, it added.

It said the bank played a leading role in financing industrial development in the country.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CCEA clears strategic disinvestment of IDBI Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, has given its in-principle approval for strategic disinvestment along with transfer of management control in IDBI Bank Ltd. The extent of respective shareholdings to be divested by the Government of India and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) will be determined at the time of structuring of transaction consultation with RBI.

Government of India (GoI) and LIC together own more than 94% of equity of IDBI Bank (GoI 45.48%, LIC 49.24%). LIC is currently the promoter of IDBI Bank with Management Control and GoI is the co-promoter

The LIC Board of Directors have passed a resolution to the effect that LIC may reduce its shareholding in IDBI Bank Ltd by divesting its stake in conjunction with a strategic stake sale proposed by the government, with the goal of relinquishing management control and considering price, market outlook, statutory requirements, and policyholder interests.

It is expected that strategic buyer will infuse capital, new technologies, and best management practises for the optimal development business potential and growth of IDBI Bank Ltd.’s and will generate more business without relying on LIC or government assistance/funds.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDBI Bank back in black in FY21 after 5 years, posts profit of Rs 1,359 cr, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LIC-controlled IDBI Bank turned profitable in the fiscal ended in March 2021 after five years, posting a net profit of Rs 1,359 crore for the year. In 2019-20, the lender had posted a net loss of Rs 12,887 crore.

IDBI Bank is back in black after five years, said the lender.

In the last quarter of the fiscal year 2020-21, the bank reported a nearly four-fold jump in its net profit to Rs 512 crore, IDBI Bank said in a release. The bank had posted a profit of Rs 135 crore in the year-ago quarter.

The bank, which came out of the RBI‘s prompt corrective action (PCA) framework earlier in March this year, said its turnaround strategies led to the transformation.

Total income during Q4FY21 rose to Rs 6,969.59 crore from Rs 6,924.94 crore in the same period of 2019-20.

The full year income, however, was down at Rs 24,557 crore as against Rs 25,295 crore.

Gross NPA (non-performing asset) ratio improved to 22.37 per cent as on March 31, 2021 as against 27.53 per cent in the year-ago period. Net NPA improved to 1.97 per cent from 4.19 per cent, IDBI Bank said.

The bank said its recovery from technically written off accounts improved to Rs 269 crore in Q4FY21 as against Rs 105 crore in the third quarter FY21.

Provisions for bad loans and contingencies were raised to Rs 2,457 crore during the reported quarter as against Rs 1,584 crore.

The bank said it has made Covid-related provisions of Rs 363 crore at the end of March 2021.

IDBI Bank shares traded at Rs 36.25 on BSE, up 2.69 per cent from the previous close.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Insurance cos getting FDI up to 74% to get 1 year time fulfil conditions for key managerial positions

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Finance Ministry has notified draft rules for increased foreign direct investment (FDI) ceiling in the insurance sector. These rules prescribe one year time frame for compliance of requirements related with appointment of Resident Indian Citizens on key management posts. Also, total investment will mean sum of direct and indirect foreign investments, it states.

After announcement in the Budget this year, Parliament approved amendment in the Bill for raising FDI limit to 74 per cent from 49 per cent. According to the Ministry, persons ‘likely to be affected’ can give their suggestions within 15 days from now to the draft rules.

According to the draft, in an Indian Insurance Company having foreign investment, a majority of its directors, a majority of its key management persons, and at least one among the chairperson of its Board, its managing director and its Chief Executive Officer, will be Resident Indian Citizen.

Also read: Government may hike FDI limit in pension sector to 74 per cent

The rules also stipulate that at least 50 per cent of directors in the board will be independent directors. However, if the chairperson is an independent director then at-least one third of its Board shall comprise independent directors, it clarifies.

“Every Indian Insurance Company having foreign investment, existing on or before the date of commencement of the Indian Insurance Companies (Foreign Investment) (Amendment) Rules, 2021, shall within one year from such commencement comply with the requirements of the provisions,” rules said.

Direct foreign investment

It also envisages that total foreign investment in an Indian Insurance Company will mean the sum total of direct and indirect foreign investment by foreign investors in such a company. Investment by foreigner (non-resident) in an Indian entity is considered as Direct Foreign Investment. Investment by an Indian company (which is owned or controlled by foreigners) into another Indian entity is considered as Indirect Foreign Investment. It is also known as downstream investment.

The foreign investment in insurance sector was permitted in the year 2000 by allowing the same up to 26 per cent in an Indian insurance company. Later, in 2015, this limit was raised to 49 per cent. According to an analysis by State Bank of India, in the last 20 years, private insurance companies have explored many new innovations to boost business. However, due to the nature of this business, the sector needs more capital for growth and regulatory needs. The Covid-19 pandemic has shown that further penetration of insurance in India is needed and for that capital infusion is required.

FDIs in private insurers

The report, using March 2019 data, said that the average FDI investments in the 23 private life insurer is only 35.5 per cent, 30 per cent for 21 non-life private insurers and 31.7 per cent for the 7-specialised health insurance. “In our view, the increase in FDI limit in the insurance may receive ₹5,000-6,000 crore of foreign investment in the sector in the next 1-2 years and ₹15,000-16,000 crore in the next 5-years, apart from deeper product expertise and better underwriting skills,” the report said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Offloading of LIC stake in IDBI Bank will hit policyholders’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All-India IDBI Officers’ Association has cautioned that any move by the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India to offload the stake held in IDBI Bank could hurt the interests of policyholders of LIC. The public sector life insurer was permitted to acquire up to 51 per cent equity in IDBI Bank, breaching the cap of 15 per cent originally stipulated for such transactions.

In a letter to the Chairman, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), Vithal Koteswara Rao AV, General Secretary of the Association, said that various reports in the media have suggested that LIC has been making repeated efforts to offload the stake it holds in IDBI Bank.

Also read: We will try to grow our business in a very calibrated way: IDBI Bank CEO

Loss may be distributed

Any loss that the LIC incurs in the transaction will, in turn, be distributed among the policyholders while declaring bonuses. The stake it holds in the bank was purchased at an average price per share of about ₹60 in 2019 whereas the current market price of the IDBI Bank share is at ₹40, Rao said.

The LIC of India holds 529,41,02,939 shares of IDBI Bank currently. When seen in absolute terms, the deal, if allowed to go through, will cause a loss that could runs into several thousands of crores, Rao said in the letter. It will only force the policyholders of the LIC to bear the brunt of this humongous loss.

“As most of our members are also policyholders of the LIC, we are obliged to make this request on behalf of our members to arrange to initiate suitable measures to see that none of the policyholders is subjected to any financial loss when the LIC seeks to pare the stake it now holds in IDBI Bank,” the letter said.

Series of worrying events

The Association expressed its worry over a series of events initiated with the acquisition of 51 per cent of stake in IDBI Bank in January 2019, followed by an announcement by the Reserve Bank in March that year that the status of IDBI Bank stands changed from a public sector bank to a private bank.

The next was the unilateral modification of service conditions of IDBI Bank officers by the management linking their performance with prospective termination, which the Association feels has been made with a clear intention of subjecting them to victimisation ‘as per the whims and fancies of the management’.

The Union Finance Minister’s observation that interests of the workforce of any public sector bank being privatised would be protected, attracts interest. But the ground reality prevailing at the bank versus the Finance Minister’s pronouncement are contradictory, the Association says.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Find out the real returns on a traditional insurance plan

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Most folks starting out on their career end up committing to hefty premium payments on traditional insurance plans because they’re somehow led to believe that they offer much better returns than plain vanilla products such as bank deposits. But they’re making a mistake. Traditional insurance plans usually offer low returns that are obscured by the truckloads of jargon that insurance firms and agents use to describe their ‘benefits’. Here are four tips to decipher the true returns.

Death vs Survival benefits

The first step to understanding returns from a traditional insurance plan is to separate the two kinds of benefits it offers – the death benefit and survival benefit. Death benefit is the sum that your nominees will get if you die during the policy term. Survival benefits are what you’ll receive when the policy matures.

While product brochures and benefit illustrations may list both the death and survival benefits side-by-side, it stands to reason that you will never receive both at the same time.

Take the case of LIC’s Bima Jyoti, a recently launched savings-cum-insurance plan. The plan is available for terms ranging from 15 to 20 years and you’ll pay premiums for five years less than the policy term you choose. Consider 35-year-old Rao who buys a Bima Jyoti plan for 20 years. He’ll pay an annual premium of ₹78,770 plus GST (at 4.5 per cent for the first year and 2.25 per cent thereafter) for 15 years for a ₹10 lakh basic sum assured. The basic sum assured is the amount of life insurance that he chooses to buy.

This plan offers survival benefits in two forms. If he lives until 55, as he is quite likely to, he will get back his basic sum assured plus guaranteed additions at the rate of ₹50 for every ₹1000 basic sum assured, for every policy year. In effect, at 55, Rao would have paid ₹12.09 lakh as annual premium by 55 (₹82314 for the first year and ₹80542 for 14 years after including GST). He will receive ₹20 lakh as a lumpsum payment in return at 55. This will consist of ₹10 lakh in basic sum assured and Rs 10 lakh by way of guaranteed additions (calculated as ₹50/1000*1000000*20) that have been accruing each year. This ₹20 lakh return at maturity is what he should be looking at to evaluate this plan. Applying an IRR (Internal Rate of Return) to the survival benefits, the effective return for Rao works out to about 4 per cent.

Rao needs to be less bothered about the complicated death benefit calculations. The plan promises death benefits as “sum assured on death plus guaranteed additions till date”. Here, the “sum assured on death” is the higher of 125 per cent of basic sum assured, 7 times annual premium or 105 per cent of total premiums paid. So, if Rao unfortunately passes away at age 50, his nominees will receive Rs 20 lakh ((1.25*10,00,000) + (50/1000*10,00,000*15)). But this is irrelevant to him if he is mainly looking at this as an investment product.

Guaranteed or Participating

When traditional insurance products are pitched to you, insurers often make a big deal out of the attractive bonuses offered by the plan. However, you may not know that these bonuses, like the ones that you get from your employer, are conditional on the insurance company doing well.

Traditional plans usually offer three kinds of bonuses – simple reversionary bonus, final maturity bonus and loyalty additions. All three are paid out only if the insurer’s balance sheet is found to contain a surplus over its future liabilities, at the end of each year. At the end of each year, insurance companies hire an actuary (a professional mathematician) to calculate if their current funds (Life Fund) accumulated by way of life premiums will be sufficient to meet future claims from policyholders. Any surplus that the actuary finds is distributed to policyholders as the Simple Reversionary Bonus. In place of the Simple Reversionary Bonus, some plans may accumulate these surpluses and pay them as Loyalty Additions at the end of the policy term.

Yet other plans may also promise a Final Additional Bonus as a one-time payout at the policy maturity. While you can get a rough idea of the bonus rates declared by an insurer based on history, do note that there’s no guarantee that future bonus rates will be the same as the past.

While comparing traditional plans, be sure to distinguish between plans that offer guaranteed additions (which are not dependent on the insurer’s surpluses) and those that offer bonuses, which are optional. If you find the word ‘participating’ in the description, you’re buying a plan that depends on bonuses for returns.

Simple vs Compound interest

One of the key pitches to market such plans is that they offer steady guaranteed additions in a declining interest rate environment. Bima Jyoti’s Guaranteed Additions of ₹50 per thousand, for instance, are pitted against the 5 per cent interest on a bank FD. Many a time, agents point to the reversionary bonus rates of ₹40-50 per thousand declared by LIC to ‘prove’ that they are superior to other fixed income products. This is a fallacious comparison.

Traditional insurance products pay out their guaranteed additions and reversionary bonuses as simple additions to your sum assured. When a traditional insurance plan offers a guaranteed addition of ₹50 per thousand, it will add ₹50,000 a year to your kitty on a ₹10 lakh sum assured. But this sum does not compound or earn interest on interest. Interest rates on cumulative bank FDs or bonds, in contrast, earn interest on all your previous balances including your interest receipts. Given that compounding makes a huge difference to your long- term wealth from any investment product, comparing simple and compound return-earning products is like comparing chalk and cheese.

While most investment products pitched to you showcase the returns they’ll on the sums you invest, traditional insurance plans often don’t do this. They have a strange practise of promising ‘benefits’ not on the premiums you pay, but on the sum assured, which is usually the life cover you’re buying. Usually, guaranteed additions, reversionary bonuses and loyalty additions are all calculated on the sum assured you sign up for.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Post Covid insurance landscape: When life insurers pivot to guaranteed income products

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In the post Covid-19 world, life insurers are now looking to ride on changed consumer preference to guaranteed income products. They have now realised that the masses, especially in interior India, have turned risk averse and want to be shielded from market and interest rate volatility, thereby favouring products that assure guaranteed income, according to industry players.

For instance, Canara HSBC Oriental Bank of Commerce Life Insurance, whose new business from guaranteed products for FY 19-20 and April-December 2020 stood at healthy 35 per cent for both years, has recently rolled out its fifth guaranteed product, Guaranteed Income4Life.

It is a non-linked, non-par individual life insurance savings-cum-protection plan which not only offers an individual the opportunity to secure his/her life but also allows one to have regular income to take care of both long-term and short-term financial goals, said Akshay Dhand, Appointed Actuary, Canara HSBC Oriental Bank of Commerce Life Insurance.

“Guaranteed Income4Life has been specially designed to offer life insurance coverage and benefits of a savings product under one umbrella. Over the last few years, customers have favoured guaranteed products. As insurers expand to tier-2 and tier-3 cities, there is a movement to guaranteed products and therefore insurers are now moving to such products,” Dhand said.

For life insurers, providing guaranteed products is the most risky one and despite this they are ready to manage this risk and offer these products to customers, he said.

Most of the earlier variants of guaranteed products that Canara HSBC Oriental Bank of Commerce Life Insurance were giving lump sum benefits (endowment or annual income). “Our latest Guaranteed Income4Life focusses on income benefit much more and allows you to take income for short term, medium term or even life long. So the key pitch is this is typical income product where you can get income up to 99 years. The product has lot of flexibility too,” he said.

Sameer Joshi, Chief Agency Officer, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Council Co Ltd, said: “Guaranteed income products from life insurance companies bring in a financial certainty in terms of returns as they are not dependent on market movements. They are suitable for risk-averse individuals who are looking for a guaranteed fixed rate of return throughout their investment tenure, irrespective of pandemics like Covid-19 or volatility in markets. With these products, individuals can receive a fixed and assured regular income to continue with the same lifestyle. At the same time, they can also provide a back-up for their family’s life goals through the life insurance cover available under the plan.”

Casparus Kromhout, MD & CEO, Shriram Life Insurance, said: “Non-linked non-par individual life insurance plans have the dual benefit of life cover combined with savings. These traditional endowment plans provide a guaranteed return to the customer at the end of the policy term; thus making them well suited for risk-free financial planning for specific future goals. The combined life cover further helps secure the savings for the family. Thus, these plans have a good uptake especially amongst customers who prefer to be risk averse.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI pulls IDBI Bank out of the PCA framework, bank to resume normal lending, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday said IDBI Bank has been taken out of the prompt corrective action (PCA) framework after it found the state-run lender was not in breach of its rules on regulatory capital, bad loans and leverage ratio.

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC)-owned lender has given the regulator a written commitment that it shall comply with the norms of minimum regulatory capital, bad assets and leverage ratio on an ongoing basis. Coming out of the PCA framework would allow the bank to resume it’s normal lending operations including corporate loans.

IDBI Bank was placed under the so-called PCA framework in 2017 over its high bad loans and negative return on assets, at a time when Indian lenders battled record levels of soured assets, prompting the RBI to tighten thresholds.

The RBI said that the performance of IDBI Bank was reviewed by the board for financial supervision (BFS) in its meeting held on February 18. After taking everything into consideration, it was decided that the bank be taken out of the PCA framework.

“It was noted that as per published results for the quarter ending December 31, 2020, the bank is not in breach of the PCA parameters on regulatory capital, Net NPA and Leverage ratio. The bank has apprised the RBI of the structural and systemic improvements that it has put in place which would help the bank in continuing to meet these commitments,” the central bank said.

IDBI Bank posted a net profit of Rs 378 crore in the third quarter (Q3) ended December 2020-21 (Q3FY21), aided by a rise in net interest income. This is the fourth consecutive quarter of profit for the lender. It had booked a net loss of Rs 5,763 crore in Q3 of 2019-20.

IDBI Bank had met three out of four key criteria needed to exit the prompt corrective action framework. IDBI Bank’s gross bad loan ratio, which was among the highest, has also eased in recent quarters, standing at 23.52% as of end-December.

  • Technically classified as a private bank after its takeover by LIC, IDBI Bank continues to struggle with recoveries from stressed corporate NPAs. However, with aggressive positioning, Net NPA ratio has improved to 1.94% against 5.25%.
  • Provision Coverage Ratio, a key financial parameter, improved to 97.08% in the third quarter from 92.41% in the previous fiscal
  • Its leverage ratio has also surpassed the 4% threshold and currently stands at 5.71%.

Its capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR), including counter cyclical buffer (CCB) stood at 14.77%, against the regulatory minimum of 11.5%. It’s return on assets (RoA) for Q3 stood at 0.51%. Retail loans accounted for 60% of the total loan book, with the rest being corporate loans. IDBI Bank’s total deposits rose 2.85% y-o-y to Rs 2.24 lakh crore at the end of December 2020. The share of current accounts savings accounts (CASA) in total deposits was 48.97% as on December 31, 2020.

However, shares of IDBI Bank have lost more than 50% of their value since RBI brought it under the framework in 2017. They have surged sharply since the federal budget in February on expectations New Delhi intends to sell its stake in the bank to help India’s depleted coffers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 3 4 5 6 7