Home Truths: What you need to look for while redeveloping property jointly

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Every asset has a lifetime, and brick-and-mortar homes surely start to show cracks. Typically, beyond 30 years, maintenance costs – for issues such as water leaks or clogged plumbing – may start to increase for buildings. And as your needs may have changed, you may also prefer a different floor plan or size; you may want better facilities such as more parking. These may prompt you to rebuild, rather than do a quick renovation.

You need to engage with a builder to get it done. However, rather than pay for the project and get a contractor, you can enter into an agreement with a developer, to be light on your pocket, plus even get some cash.

How it works

In a joint development, the house owners enter into an agreement with a developer to reconstruct their home. In exchange, the builder is given a share of the land that offsets the cost of construction.

For example, say an old apartment complex that has 4 flats of 1,000 sq ft each needs to be redeveloped. The property may have been built on a one-ground land (2,400 sq ft). The agreement terms may be that the owners each get a new 1,000 sq ft flat and the builder would construct additional floors and sell them. The undivided share of land would now be split between the four existing owners and the new owners who would buy from the builder.

The same joint development method works for independent houses as well. Similar to an apartment complex, the owners (typically members of the same family) get certain sq ft of constructed homes and the developer can build 2-3 more. While building independent homes can be done, what usually happens is that a single-family home is rebuilt as a multi-dwelling complex.

Besides constructing, the builder may also pay the owners upfront money and cover the rent costs (as owners need to move out) during the demolition and construction period. How much money you get as well as the share of land the builder gets and the owners keeps depend on many factors. For instance, a property in a prime location with sizeable land, where Floor Space Index (FSI) is high, rebuilt during a hot property market may fetch owners a higher payment and better terms, as they would have strong bargaining power. When there is some distress in the market, builders may negotiate on payment terms, especially what is paid upfront, citing liquidity issues.

Merits and risks

One clear advantage for home owners is to have a new home that fits your current needs, without having to worry about arranging money for construction. Also, for seniors, joint development can help unlock value from their asset and provide some amount of cash to cover their other expenses.

There are also risks and downsides to consider. One big headache is that of timing of the tax payment. Tax rules relating to redevelopment can be complex and subject to some amount of interpretation. For instance, tax liability arises when property transfer happens; there is often confusion on whether this is the date of the written agreement or project completion. It helps to consult a tax advisor and draft the agreement wordings the right way.

The first roadblock – when multiple stakeholders are involved – is often in getting started. Getting consensus from all home owners on the builder’s terms and timelines may be a long-drawn one. Redevelopment is a lengthy process and keeping the consensus can also be a challenge.

Consider the legal aspects of the agreement thoroughly, to protect yourself. Common issues where owners are short-changed include the rights of developers on the land and penalties for delays. One example is the rights granted to the builder for entering the premises, through a general power of attorney. This can be revoked if the contract terms are breached; but often owners do not register it and so it is not legally binding. The details of the proposed plan must also be specified clearly to avoid misunderstanding on what is built.

The biggest risk of all is the choice of builder. Rather than base the decision on good payment terms, also consider non-financial quality aspects. Verify the reputation – for quality, timely completion, responsiveness of the builder by going thorough reference checks. Ensure the builder has local expertise and currently has the financial and operational delivery capability.

Even with these, there is a risk that market conditions in the local area may worsen, causing demand to drop. If the builder is not able to find buyers, the project may be delayed. Owners may want to study the market – to know the going rates and terms in the area – before you go ahead with the project.

The writer is an independent

financial consultant

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Can I buy an apartment to get capital gains tax relief?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


This is with further reference to your reply to the query raised by Mr. GSR Murthy in the column ‘Tax Query’ in BL dated January 3. It was stated that the flat in question was purchased on November 16, 2010 for ₹24.5 lakh and sold on March 11 for ₹38 lakh. You had replied that the profit on sale would qualify as LTCG. Please explain how indexation shall apply in this case, and how LTCG is to be calculated?

Mathew Joseph

As per the provisions of the I-T Act, any capital asset, being land or building or both, held by a taxpayer for a period of more than 24 months qualifies as a long-term capital asset and any gain / loss on transfer of such asset is to be considered as long-term capital gains/loss (LTCG / LTCL). In the instant case, the LTCG is to be calculated as below:

Cost Inflation Index (CII) for every FY is notified by the Central government and is available on the official website of IT Department — tinyurl.com/taxCII . The property was purchased in FY 2010-11, for which the CII was 167 and sold in FY 2019-, for which the CII was 289.

I bought a piece of land a year ago, and will sell it shortly. I may get ₹ 20- lakh capital gain. Can I buy an apartment to get relief? Currently, I own one apartment.

Srinivasa M Reddy

I note that the capital asset in consideration is land. Also, the same was acquired by you a year ago. Please note that the I-T Act provides for relief from taxation of long-term capital gains (LTCG) on sale of land by investing in a residential house property, as per section 54F of the I-T Act. However, as per the provisions of the Act, the land shall be considered to be a long-term capital asset (LTCA) if it is held at least for 24 months. In this case, since the land is expected to be held for less than 24 months, the same shall qualify as short-term capital asset (STCA). No relief shall be available from taxation of any gain arising on transfer of such STCA.

On an assumption that you shall sell the same after holding for 24 months, you shall be eligible to claim exemption of the total amount of LTCG by investing the Net Sales Consideration (NSC — sale price less any expenditure incurred wholly and necessarily for such sale). In case a lesser amount is invested, a proportionate exemption shall be allowed (ie, in proportion of LTCG and NSC invested). Also, the following conditions merit attention and are required to be satisfied for claiming such exemption:

— Purchase of a house should be done a year before or two years after the date of sale. In case of construction, the same should be done within three years from the date of sale.

— You should not hold more than one residential house other than the investment in new asset.

In case this condition is breached in subsequent years, the exemption earlier allowed would be withdrawn and capital gain will be brought to tax in the year in which the breach has taken place. Since you own only one residential house property in your name, you shall be eligible to claim benefit of exemption under Section 54F, subject to fulfilling the specified conditions

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY