More US finance giants tiptoe into crypto assets, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW YORK: Investing in bitcoin and other digital currencies remains a risky game where the rules could change significantly, but the payoff could be big.

In response to this dilemma, several leading US financial heavyweights are staying on the sidelines, while an increasing number are proceeding cautiously into the growing world of crypto assets.

“My own personal advice to people: Stay away from it,” JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said recently, before adding, “That does not mean the clients don’t want it.”

JPMorgan, the biggest US bank by assets, is currently assessing how it can help clients transact in cryptocurrency, Dimon said last month at the bank’s annual meeting.

Formerly something of an investment sideshow dominated by computer geeks, cryptocurrencies are sparking greater interest among mainstream investors after a big jump in bitcoin prices in 2020 and early 2021.

On Thursday, the venerable giant State Street announced the creation of a new digital finance division.

On Wednesday, the head of online trading firm Interactive Brokers vowed to establish online trading of cryptocurrencies on the platform by the end of the summer.

Like its rivals Charles Schwab and Fidelity, Interactive Brokers does not now offer bitcoin trading on its platform, although it does give clients the option to invest in some assets that include cryptocurrencies or bitcoin futures.

Investors who want to trade bitcoin can currently turn to Robinhood or the cryptocurrency specialist Coinbase.

ForUsAll, a platform that manages retirement accounts for small businesses, on Monday announced an agreement with Coinbase that allows clients to invest up to five percent of their balances in cryptocurrencies.

Investment bank Morgan Stanley in March said it would allow wealthier clients to invest in bitcoin funds, while Goldman Sachs recently established a team dedicated to trading cryptocurrencies.

The chief executives of Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Bank of America said at a congressional hearing in late May that they are approaching the cryptocurrency landscape with caution.

Fidelity Investments, which established a digital assets division in 2018 to execute cryptocurrency trades for hedge funds and other institutional investors, filed papers with US securities regulators for a bitcoin exchange traded fund (ETF).

The move could potentially expand cryptocurrency investments to a broader range of individual investors.

Tougher rules ahead?
Still, many financial players are reluctant to dive into an investment realm associated with black markets that has sparked interest from US and global regulators.

There is also remarkable volatility, with bitcoin beginning 2021 at around $30,000 and hitting $63,000 in April before falling back to $34,000 in June.

“Speculators and those suffering from FOMO (the ‘fear of missing out’) will surely continue to flock to cryptos in the hopes of achieving huge returns,” said Ian Gendler of research firm Value Line.

But Gendler urges clients to avoid cryptocurrency investments, citing the elevated risk and the lack of a tangible asset compared with putting money into commodities or a company. Bitcoin and other digital money is also not backed by governments, he noted.

“Cryptocurrencies are only worth what the next investor is willing to pay,” he said.

Still, many in finance do not see cryptocurrency as a transient phenomenon.

“We do believe bitcoin, and more broadly crypto assets, are a new and emerging asset class that will likely be here to stay,” said Chris Kuiper, vice president at CFRA Research.

CFRA expects “the large banks as well as smaller financial institutions to continue to adopt them, particularly as the infrastructure and legal/regulatory framework continues to be built out,” Kuiper added.

The Basel Committee, which coordinates regulation among central banks, this week proposed new rules that would require banks to set aside capital for cryptocurrency investments.

Gary Gensler, the new head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has also said he wants to bolster protections for cryptocurrency investors, telling CNBC that such investors “don’t have full protections that they have in the equity markets or in the commodity futures market.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Beware! A bear market wave is about to hit Bitcoin, warns JPMorgan, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Eric Lam and Joanna Ossinger

Bitcoin’s recent bounce has yet to dispel doubts about its vulnerability.

The cryptocurrency has jumped 10% over two days and was trading at $36,993 as of 9 a.m. in London on Thursday. While the momentum may cheer bulls, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. team said backwardation in the futures market — where the spot price is above futures prices — is a reason for caution.

“We believe that the return to backwardation in recent weeks has been a negative signal pointing to a bear market,” JPMorgan strategists led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou wrote in a note. They added that Bitcoin’s relatively depressed share of total crypto market value is another concerning trend.

Traders are waiting for the next catalyst to break Bitcoin from a $30,000 to $40,000 range that’s been in place since a collapse from a record of almost $65,000 in April. Public criticism of the digital currency’s energy needs by tycoon Elon Musk and a Chinese regulatory crackdown are among obstacles. Bulls got a bit of a lift Wednesday after El Salvador made Bitcoin legal tender.

The virtual currency “needs to push into $39,460 and the top of the recent range to really attract, but we will need to see a break here for the bulls to feel we’re out of this period of vulnerability,” Chris Weston, head of research with Pepperstone Financial Pty, wrote in a note Thursday.

The June 9 analysis from JPMorgan looked at the 21-day rolling average of the 2nd Bitcoin futures spread over spot prices. The backwardation this showed is an “unusual development and a reflection of how weak Bitcoin demand is at the moment from institutional investors” who use contracts listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

The Bitcoin futures curve was in backwardation for most of 2018, a year when the cryptocurrency fell 74% after a spectacular boom, JPMorgan said.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s share of the overall crypto market value is 42% currently, down from roughly 70% at the start of the year, according to data from tracker CoinGecko. For some analysts, that’s in part a sign of retail-driven investor froth lifting other coins.

Bitcoin’s share may need to top 50% to make it easier to argue the current bear market is over, the JPMorgan strategists said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Green’ to be soon the colour of money for European banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The European Union is working on new rules where banks will have to state the “greenness” of their activities, or what share of their business is financing climate-friendly activities — a move that would impact profitability in an increasingly environmentally conscious world.

The so-called green asset ratio (GAR) measure is meant to help inform stakeholders — including investors, employees and depositors — of a bank’s commitment to disinvesting from fossil fuels by revealing what proportion of its assets are environmentally sound.

How would it work

Depending on its relative shade of green, a lender’s funding costs could be at stake, as well as its ability to retain talent and its attractiveness to customers. Unlike banks’ other complex financial metrics, a green label may resonate with a much broader public that’s increasingly conscious of companies’ role in society.

However, there is a lot of uncertainty around what will be included in the GAR. If too many banking activities are included it may unnecessarily hit some lenders, and if only a few are included there is danger of “greenwashing.” Also, the banks may shift dirty business to where it isn’t captured in the GAR.

While the European Union proposed measuring green assets against banks’ entire activities, including derivatives, the European Banking Authority has a different view. It favours excluding derivatives entirely from the calculation and reporting so-called “capital markets indicators” separately.

The EBA’s proposal could let banks off the hook on climate change by possibly flattering their green asset ratios. Derivatives are a significant and somewhat risky part of investment banking so their inclusion in the GAR would make a difference. Worse, some lenders might take on greater risk by structuring non-green deals as derivatives to keep them out of the GAR calculations.

Where do European banks stand?

French banks are known for dominating their home market, but they’re considered also-rans on the global stage when compared with US lenders. That’s not the case in the world of green banking. Credit Agricole is the leading underwriter of green bonds, three places ahead of the much larger JPMorgan since the end of 2015, according to an analysis on activity from almost 140 banks around the world by Bloomberg. Two other Paris-based banks, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale, rank in the top 10 in the league table.

French banks were early in identifying green lending as a way to differentiate themselves from their rivals, said Maia Godemer, a London-based researcher at BloombergNEF, a clean-energy think tank. Green debt offerings have been steadily increasing for the past five years, and 2021 is shaping up to be the biggest yet. Issuers have sold more than $187 billion of green bonds so far in 2021, almost triple the pace from the year-earlier period.

A renewable energy market

The underwriting market for renewable-energy companies is minuscule when compared with the funds that fossil-fuel companies are raking in. Since the start of 2016, renewable-energy producers have raised less than $160 billion in the debt markets, compared with the $3.6 trillion for non-renewable energy producers, according to Bloomberg data. This year, when one would expect the spread to be narrowing, green energy providers have received less than $10 billion from bond sales and loans, while fossil-fuel companies got almost $190 billion. The leading lenders to renewable-energy companies since 2016 include Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, BNP Paribas and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group. Bank of America was the top U.S. bank, placing 11th in the league table.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian banks do balancing act between green commitments and coal financing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Indian banks have to delicately balance between the renewable energy commitments and funding coal-fired power projects that are required for growth. On the other hand, global banks’ green financing is outpacing fossil fuel activity.

India may build new coal-fired power plants as they generate the cheapest power, according to a draft electricity policy in February, despite growing calls from environmentalists to deter the use of coal.

“While India is committed to add more capacity through non-fossil sources of generation, coal-based generation capacity may still be required to be added in the country as it continues to be the cheapest source of generation,” the NEP draft read.

This may put more pressure on local banks to fund such ventures, after having suffered a bout of bad loans on power plants in the last decade.

SBI faces pressure

State Bank of India faces pressure from its global investors like BlackRock but also needs to finance coal projects to electrify more homes

International investors are increasingly restricting support to companies involved in extracting or consuming coal, yet nearly 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal plants and demand for power is set to rise as the economy recovers from the blows of the pandemic.

BlackRock and Norway’s Storebrand ASA, both of which hold less than 1% in the bank, raised their objections over the past year. Amundi SA divested its holdings of the lender’s green bonds because of the bank’s ties to a controversial coal project in northern Australia. State Bank of India hasn’t decided whether to help finance the Carmichael mine for Adani Ports Ltd, whose main shareholder is Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, following mounting pressure from climate activists and investors, Bloomberg reported in April.

SBI has been boosting the share of loans to the clean energy sector and it approved three times more loans to solar projects in the nancial year that ended in March than to the overall thermal sector.

That’s because there was hardly any demand for new loans from fossil-fuel producers last year.

The lender’s loans to the power sector stood at Rs 1.86 lakh crore or 7.3% of the total at the end of March with Rs 31,920 crore of loans to renewable energy.

In India, the shift away from coal will take time. Millions of citizens remained without power months after Modi’s planned deadline to electrify every home passed two years ago. The environment ministry earlier this year further delayed anti-pollution guidelines for power plants that use the fuel.

Global banks surge

Funding for global energy is at a tipping point. Green bonds and loans from the global banking sector so far this year exceeded the value of fossil financing for the first time since the clinching of the Paris Agreement at the very end of 2015.

Since the clinching of the Paris Agreement, the global banking sector has underwritten more than $3.6 trillion of bonds and loans for the fossil-fuel industry. No bank has done more–or taken more in fees–than JPMorgan Chase in the past five-plus years.

The same constellation of banks has originated more than $1.3 trillion of green bonds and loans to support climate-friendly projects over the same period. No bank has done less than Wells Fargo, which has arranged the lowest proportion of green financing relative to fossil fuel among the world’s largest lenders.

But the biggest surprise of all is that high finance may have just shifted into a new era. Led by underwriting from firms including JPMorgan and Citigroup, green bond sales and loans this year are outpacing new fossil finance activity for the first time since the Paris Agreement was announced at the very end of 2015.

The transformation in the capital markets–if it lasts–indicates that the world’s largest banks may finally be getting behind the movement towards a low-carbon future. It also may be a sign that financial giants are seeing an advantage to green projects from a profit-and-loss standpoint.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Crypto versus gold debate rages on Wall Street as flows reverse, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Gold is back with a vengeance this month just as the crypto rally falls apart, refueling the Wall Street debate over the link between the two putative hedging assets.

Bullion funds have seen the biggest two weeks of inflows since October and prices are edging closer to $1,900 an ounce. In contrast, Bitcoin has plunged by almost 40% from a $63,000 peak and funds are recording outflows.

Yes, the weaker dollar and falling inflation-adjusted yields are big reasons for the gold revival. Elon Musk-spurred volatility, meanwhile, has snuffed out some of the speculative euphoria in Bitcoin, while undermining its ambition to attract the institutional crowd.

Yet, all this fascinates a market cohort that point out the parallels between digital gold and the real deal. They’re both viewed as inflation hedges, commodities in scarce supply and capture the cultural divide between young, tech-obsessed traders and boomer traditionalists.

Meanwhile, the likes of JPMorgan & Chase & Co. and ByteTree Asset Management say gold’s recent ascent appears to have come at least partly expense of Bitcoin as investors rotate between the two.

“There is still so much confusion between Bitcoin and gold,” wrote Charlie Morris, founder of ByteTree in a note. “They coexist, and they both thrive in an inflationary environment.”

In a report on shifting gold and Bitcoin trends, Morris suggested that fund flows are having an unusually large impact in boosting the gold price, and vice versa Bitcoin’s outgoing flows are depressing prices.

Past may be prologue: Earlier this year, Bitcoin funds pulled in institutional cash as money managers extolled a case for digital currencies to creep into gold’s spot in a portfolio. With the economic growth in full swing, more than $20 billion then left bullion-backed ETFs in the six months to April.

For some strategists, the bullion market is a starting place to divine their price forecast for Bitcoin. In a world where investors allocate gold and Bitcoin evenly to their portfolios and the two assets converge in volatility, it would imply a valuation of Bitcoin at $140,000, JPMorgan has previously estimated.

“Needless to say such convergence or equalization of volatilities or allocations is unlikely in the near future,” strategists led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou wrote.

Since the Covid-19 vaccine breakthrough triggered an economic rebound in November, exchange-traded funds tracking gold sold almost 12 million troy ounces through to the start of May, worth about $22.5 billion at today’s price.

Investors pulled almost $14 billion from the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (ticker GLD) in the period, helping cut total assets in the world’s largest gold ETF by 29%. Some $1.6 billion has flowed back into the fund to put May on course for the best month since July.

In day-to-day action, the direct link between gold and Bitcoin is hard to pin down, suggesting the connection is more about market psychology than real-money flows. The threat of price pressures and weakening dollar are good reasons for the metal’s current rally.

And while predictions for Bitcoin prices have been chastened by the selloff, the enthusiasm hasn’t gone away. Bloomberg Intelligence strategist Mike McGlone, who has a price target of $100,000 for Bitcoin, says there’s still a chance crypto can become a digital reserve asset and that makes it worth the risk.

“Gold may be losing its significance, so it may be simply prudent to diversify,” wrote McGlone. “The human nature of acknowledging a new asset class is what we see as a primary Bitcoin support.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

France’s banks are the greenest, JP Morgan makes most from fossil fuels, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


French banks are known for dominating their home market, but they’re considered also-rans on the global stage when compared with US lenders. That’s not the case in the world of green banking. Credit Agricole is the leading underwriter of green bonds, three places ahead of the much larger JPMorgan since the end of 2015, according to an analysis on activity from almost 140 banks around the world by Bloomberg. Two other Paris-based banks, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale, rank in the top 10 in the league table.

French banks were early in identifying green lending as a way to differentiate themselves from their rivals, said Maia Godemer, a London-based researcher at BloombergNEF, a clean-energy think tank. Green debt offerings have been steadily increasing for the past five years, and 2021 is shaping up to be the biggest yet. Issuers have sold more than $187 billion of green bonds so far in 2021, almost triple the pace from the year-earlier period.

Global banks surge

Since the clinching of the Paris Agreement, the global banking sector has underwritten more than $3.6 trillion of bonds and loans for the fossil-fuel industry. No bank has done more–or taken more in fees–than JPMorgan Chase in the past five-plus years.

The same constellation of banks has originated more than $1.3 trillion of green bonds and loans to support climate-friendly projects over the same period. No bank has done less than Wells Fargo, which has arranged the lowest proportion of green financing relative to fossil fuel among the world’s largest lenders.

But the biggest surprise of all is that high finance may have just shifted into a new era. Led by underwriting from firms including JPMorgan and Citigroup, green bond sales and loans this year are outpacing new fossil finance activity for the first time since the Paris Agreement was announced at the very end of 2015.

The transformation in the capital markets–if it lasts–indicates that the world’s largest banks may finally be getting behind the movement towards a low-carbon future. It also may be a sign that financial giants are seeing an advantage to green projects from a profit-and-loss standpoint.

JPMorgan’s fossil fuel windfall

The largest bank in the U.S. is also the most entangled in the fossil-fuel industry. JPMorgan has pocketed an estimated $900 million in fees from helping arrange loans and bond sales for energy companies since the start of 2016. That’s 14% more than Citigroup, 40% more than Bank of America and 60% more than Wells Fargo, its closest competitors.

JP Morgan’s dominant position in this part of the investment banking business has attracted criticism from not only climate activists but also from its own shareholders. In response, the New York-based company unveiled a new round of steps designed to lower its exposure to corporate polluters by 2030. Among other initiatives, the giant bank pledged to reduce the carbon emissions of its lending portfolios for the oil and gas, electric power and auto manufacturing sectors.

Wells Fargo’s green footprint
In the fossil-fuel arena, Wells Fargo is a standout–and not in a good way.

The San Francisco-based bank ranks as the world’s second-largest arranger of bond sales and loans for fossil-fuel companies, and No. 4 by fees earned. For green bonds and loans, in contrast, Wells Fargo is the 50th biggest underwriter since the Paris climate deal, according to Bloomberg data. That disparity puts Wells Fargo in the position of the bank making the smallest effort to support the climate transition relative to its fossil finance. Wells Fargo said it’s committed to sustainable finance and has helped fund 12% of all wind and solar energy capacity in the U.S. over the past 10 years. In March, the company announced plans to deploy $500 billion to sustainable businesses and projects by 2030.

A renewable energy market

The underwriting market for renewable-energy companies is minuscule when compared with the funds that fossil-fuel companies are raking in. Since the start of 2016, renewable-energy producers have raised less than $160 billion in the debt markets, compared with the $3.6 trillion for non-renewable energy producers, according to Bloomberg data. This year, when one would expect the spread to be narrowing, green energy providers have received less than $10 billion from bond sales and loans, while fossil-fuel companies got almost $190 billion.The leading lenders to renewable-energy companies since 2016 include Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, BNP Paribas and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group. Bank of America was the top U.S. bank, placing 11th in the league table.

Coal bankers make money in China

So far in 2021, only $6.6 billion of bonds and loans have been extended to coal companies, down from $19.3 billion in the same period a year ago. The data support the growing unease among lenders to work with producers of a fossil fuel that emits the most carbon dioxide for every unit of usable energy it generates.

One of the few places where coal bankers are generating fees is China. Of the 10 largest coal bond underwriters since the start of 2016, nine are based in China. This group is led by Beijing-based Bank of China and Industrial Bank. The sole non-Chinese lender on the list is Deutsche Bank.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Goldman offers new Bitcoin derivatives to Wall Street investors, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Matthew Leising

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is wading deeper into the $1 trillion Bitcoin market, offering Wall Street investors a way to place big bets.

The investment bank has opened up trading with non-deliverable forwards, a derivative tied to Bitcoin’s price that pays out in cash. The firm then protects itself from the digital currency’s famous volatility by buying and selling Bitcoin futures in block trades on CME Group Inc., using Cumberland DRW as its trading partner. Goldman, which still isn’t active in the Bitcoin spot market, introduced the wagers to clients last month without an announcement.

“Institutional demand continues to grow significantly in this space, and being able to work with partners like Cumberland will help us expand our capabilities,” said Max Minton, Goldman’s Asia-Pacific head of digital assets. The new offering is “paving the way for us to evolve our nascent cash-settled crypto-currency capabilities.”

Goldman Sachs, which restarted a trading desk this year to help clients deal in publicly traded futures tied to Bitcoin, said in March it was also close to offering private wealth clients additional vehicles to bet on crypto prices. But the push into forwards dramatically increases its capacity to help big investors take positions. The partnership with Cumberland underscores the bank’s willingness to work with outside firms to help it do so, according to people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition they not be identified.

For years after its creation in 2009, Bitcoin was shunned by Wall Street banks, with JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon once threatening to fire any of his traders caught buying and selling the digital currency. While Dimon later softened his tone, the banking world has long seen Bitcoin as a plaything for criminals, drug dealers and money launderers.

But client interest and Bitcoin’s astronomical price gains — reaching a high of almost $65,000 in April — have turned many bankers around, with Morgan Stanley making a Bitcoin trust product available to its customers and JPMorgan working on a similar offering.

“Goldman Sachs serves as a bellwether of how sophisticated, institutional investors approach shifts in the market,” said Justin Chow, global head of business development for Cumberland DRW. “We’ve seen rapid adoption and interest in crypto from more traditional financial firms this year, and Goldman’s entrance into the space is yet another sign of how it’s maturing.”

Banks are still wary of the regulatory challenges of holding Bitcoin outright. As derivatives settled with cash, the products Goldman Sachs is offering don’t require dealing with physical Bitcoin. In a similar way, the Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan trusts give customers access to vehicles tracking Bitcoin’s price while using a third party to buy and hold the underlying digital asset.

Goldman Sachs may next offer hedge fund clients exchange-traded notes based on Bitcoin or access to the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, one of the people said.

“The crypto ecosystem is developing rapidly,” Chow said. “There is progress being made in offering ETFs, new custody providers coming online and optimism that regulatory efforts are coming into focus. It’s a great time to be in the space.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

After Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan prepares to offer rich clients access to bitcoin fund

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the latest move, JPMorgan would be the latest and biggest US megabank to adopt crypto as an asset class.

Investment bank JPMorgan’s crypto and blockchain efforts are on a roll. The bank is now looking to offer an actively managed bitcoin fund for clients in its private wealth division. With the latest move, JPMorgan would be the latest and biggest US megabank to adopt crypto as an asset class. The development, which was reported by CoinDesk on Monday, may see the bitcoin fund launched as soon as this summer. The move would also signal a shift in the company’s outlook towards cryptocurrencies as its CEO Jamie Dimon had reportedly called bitcoin a dangerous fraud in 2017 and had also threatened to fire employees who traded bitcoin. Last month, according to a CNBC report, Morgan Stanley had become the first big US bank to offer its wealthy clients access to bitcoin funds after they demand exposure to the cryptocurrency.

Comments from JPMorgan regarding the development were not immediately available.

Even as the bitcoin fund is the latest step by JPMorgan, its investment, commercial banking, and wealth management divisions have gradually evolved in their treatment of crypto and blockchain. As per CoinDesk, the bank’s research analysts regularly issue market insight on bitcoin’s price and prospects in reports available to clients. In February, it had tested blockchain’s decentralised network in space to see if two machines could transact autonomously. The experiment involved carrying out blockchain-based payments between satellites in space “which validated the approach towards a decentralized network where communication with the earth is not necessary,” according to a statement by the Nasdaq-listed manufacturer and supplier of nanosatellites for customers in the academic, government, and commercial markets – GomSpace.

Also read: Coinbase India plan: Acquire startups, hire ‘hundreds’ of employees in 2 yrs, says incoming country head

Earlier this month, JPMorgan had launched a new solution called Confirm using blockchain technology to improve funds transfers between banking institutions globally and to help bring down the number of “rejected or returned transactions caused by mismatched payment details,” according to the investment bank. As a result, the solution will lead to lowering costs for both the sending and receiving banks. “JPMorgan getting into blockchain is going to help a lot on the institutional side of fund transfers. It is looking to resolve the clearing and settlement problem which happens in the bank-to-bank transfers and takes multiple days to settle. With blockchain, JPMorgan and banks will be able to settle it in near real-time,” Ashish Agarwal, a blockchain expert and Founder of PayO — neo banking platform for SMEs – had told Financial Express Online.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

US banks deploy AI to monitor customers, workers amid tech backlash, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Paresh Dave and Jeffrey Dastin

Several U.S. banks have started deploying camera software that can analyze customer preferences, monitor workers and spot people sleeping near ATMs, even as they remain wary about possible backlash over increased surveillance, more than a dozen banking and technology sources told Reuters.

Previously unreported trials at City National Bank of Florida and JPMorgan Chase & Co as well as earlier rollouts at banks such as Wells Fargo & Co offer a rare view into the potential U.S. financial institutions see in facial recognition and related artificial intelligence systems.

Widespread deployment of such visual AI tools in the heavily regulated banking sector would be a significant step toward their becoming mainstream in corporate America.

Bobby Dominguez, chief information security officer at City National, said smartphones that unlock via a face scan have paved the way.

“We’re already leveraging facial recognition on mobile,” he said. “Why not leverage it in the real world?”

City National will begin facial recognition trials early next year to identify customers at teller machines and employees at branches, aiming to replace clunky and less secure authentication measures at its 31 sites, Dominguez said. Eventually, the software could spot people on government watch lists, he said.

JPMorgan said it is “conducting a small test of video analytic technology with a handful of branches in Ohio.” Wells Fargo said it works to prevent fraud but declined to discuss how.

Civil liberties issues loom large. Critics point to arrests of innocent individuals following faulty facial matches, disproportionate use of the systems to monitor lower-income and non-white communities, and the loss of privacy inherent in ubiquitous surveillance.

Portland, Oregon, as of Jan. 1 banned businesses from using facial recognition “in places of public accommodation,” and drugstore chain Rite Aid Corp shut a nationwide face recognition program last year.

Dominguez and other bank executives said their deployments are sensitive to the issues.

“We’re never going to compromise our clients’ privacy,” Dominguez said. “We’re getting off to an early start on technology already used in other parts of the world and that is rapidly coming to the American banking network.”

Still, the big question among banks, said Fredrik Nilsson, vice president of the Americas at Axis Communications, a top maker of surveillance cameras, is “what will be the potential backlash from the public if we roll this out?”

Walter Connors, chief information officer at Brannen Bank, said the Florida company had discussed but not adopted the technology for its 12 locations. “Anybody walking into a branch expects to be recorded,” Connors said. “But when you’re talking about face recognition, that’s a larger conversation.”

BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

JPMorgan began assessing the potential of computer vision in 2019 by using internally developed software to analyze archived footage from Chase branches in New York and Ohio, where one of its two Innovation Labs is located, said two people including former employee Neil Bhandar, who oversaw some of the effort at the time.

Chase aims to gather data to better schedule staff and design branches, three people said and the bank confirmed. Bhandar said some staff even went to one of Amazon.com Inc’s cashier-less convenience stores to learn about its computer vision system.

Preliminary analysis by Bhandar of branch footage revealed more men would visit before or after lunch, while women tended to arrive mid-afternoon. Bhandar said he also wanted to analyze whether women avoided compact spaces in ATM lobbies because they might bump into someone, but the pandemic halted the plan.

Testing facial recognition to identify clients as they walk into a Chase bank, if they consented to it, has been another possibility considered to enhance their experience, a current employee involved in innovation projects said.

Chase would not be the first to evaluate those uses. A bank in the Northeast recently used computer vision to identify busy areas in branches with newer layouts, an executive there said, speaking on the condition the company not be named.

A Midwestern credit union last year tested facial recognition for client identification at four locations before pausing over cost concerns, a source said.

While Chase developed custom computer vision in-house using components from Google, IBM Watson and Amazon Web Services, it also considered fully built systems from software startups AnyVision and Vintra, people including Bhandar said. AnyVision declined to comment, and Vintra did not respond to requests for comment.

Chase said it ultimately chose a different vendor, which it declined to name, out of 11 options considered and began testing that company’s technology at a handful of Ohio locations last October. The effort aims to identify transaction times, how many people leave because of long queues and which activities are occupying workers.

The bank added that facial, race and gender recognition are not part of this test.

Using technology to guess customers’ demographics can be problematic, some ethics experts say, because it reinforces stereotypes. Some computer vision programs also are less accurate on people of color, and critics have warned that could lead to unjust outcomes.

Chase has weighed ethical questions. For instance, some internally called for reconsidering planned testing in Harlem, a historically Black neighborhood in New York, because it could be viewed as racially insensitive, two of the people said. The discussions emerged about the same time as a December 2019 New York Times article about racism at Chase branches in Arizona.

Analyzing race was not part of the eventually tabled plans, and the Harlem branch had been selected because it housed the other Chase Innovation Lab for evaluating new technology, the people said and the bank confirmed.

TARGETING THE HOMELESS

Security uses for computer vision long have stirred banks’ interest. Wells Fargo used primitive software from the company 3VR over a decade ago to review footage of crimes and see if any faces matched those of known offenders, said John Honovich, who worked at 3VR and founded video surveillance research organization IPVM.

Identiv, which acquired 3VR in 2018, said banking sales were a major focus, but it declined to comment on Wells Fargo.

A security executive at a mid-sized Southern bank, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss secret measures, said over the last 18 months it has rolled out video analytics software at nearly every branch to generate alerts when doors to safes, computer server rooms and other sensitive areas are left open.

Outside, the bank monitors for loitering, such as the recurring issue of people setting up tents under the overhang for drive-through ATMs. Security staff at a control center can play an audio recording politely asking those people to leave, the executive said.

The issue of people sleeping in enclosed ATM lobbies has long been an industry concern, said Brian Karas, vice president of sales at Airship Industries, which develops video management and analytics software.

Systems that detected loitering so staff could activate a siren or strobe light helped increase ATM usage and reduce vandalism for several banks, he said. Though companies did not want to displace people seeking shelter, they felt this was necessary to make ATMs safe and accessible, Karas said.

City National’s Dominguez said the bank’s branches use computer vision to detect suspicious activity outside.

Sales records from 2010 and 2011 reviewed by Reuters show that Bank of America Corp purchased “iCVR” cameras, which were marketed at the time as helping organizations reduce loitering in ATM lobbies. Bank of America said it no longer uses iCVR technology.

The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank’s interest in computer vision has not abated. Its officials met with AnyVision on multiple occasions in 2019, including at a September conference during which the startup demonstrated how it could identify the face of a Bank of America executive, according to records of the presentation seen by Reuters and a person in attendance.

The bank said, “We are always reviewing potential new technology solutions that are on the market.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

After blockchain test in space, JPMorgan offers solution to improve global funds transfers between banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The new solution will lead to lowering costs for both the sending and receiving banks.

Weeks after experimenting with blockchain-based payments between satellites in space to see if two machines could transact autonomously, investment bank JPMorgan is now using blockchain technology to improve funds transfers between banking institutions globally. JPMorgan has now launched a new solution called Confirm to help bring down the number of “rejected or returned transactions caused by mismatched payment details,” according to the investment banking company. As a result, the solution will lead to lowering costs for both the sending and receiving banks.

“JPMorgan getting into blockchain is going to help a lot on the institutional side of fund transfers. It is looking to resolve the clearing and settlement problem which happens in the bank-to-bank transfers and takes multiple days to settle. With blockchain, JPMorgan and banks will be able to settle it in near real-time,” Ashish Agarwal, a blockchain expert and Founder of PayO — neo banking platform for SMEs – told Financial Express Online.

Confirm is a global account information validation application on JPMorgan’s blockchain network through which partner banking institutions, according to the company, will be able to request confirmation of the beneficiary account information and receive responses directly from other participating banks receiving the requests in near-real-time. Once the information is validated, the payment may be sent through JPMorgan’s clearing solution PayDirect to route the payment. The investment bank is working with 12 Taiwan banks for testing the use of blockchain technology to improve global funds transfers. JPMorgan had in February this year, according to a news report, partnered with State Bank of India to speed up overseas transactions for customers through the bank’s blockchain technology.

Also read: Zoho’s Sridhar Vembu gives growth mantra to SMBs; suggests entrepreneurs to focus on rural India

Last month, Visa had announced the use of cryptocurrency USD Coin — a stablecoin, which means its value is pegged directly to the US dollar — to settle transactions on its payment network on a pilot basis. Apart from Visa, institutions, and entrepreneurs including Mastercard, BlackRock, PayPal, Square, Tesla’s Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey, and more having been either engaging or dabbling with cryptocurrencies. PayPal had also last month announced that its US customers will be able to convert their Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, or Bitcoin Cash to US dollars to complete the transaction.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3