Yes Bank | Dish TV: NCLT allows Dish TV to file its response in requisition notice of Yes Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Mumbai-bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Wednesday allowed Dish TV time till November 15 to file its response in a petition filed by Yes Bank, the company’s largest shareholder.

Yes Bank had sought NCLT’s direction to the company’s board to call for an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) of the shareholders to vote on removal of MD & CEO Jawahar Goel and four other directors.

In May last year, Yes Bank invoked promoters’ pledged shares in Dish TV to own 25.63% stake in the DTH company.

On September 3rd, the bank sent a requisition notice to the company’s board to convene a special meeting of the shareholders to reconstitute the board and sought the removal of Goel from the company and induction of seven new directors.

Goel is the brother of Subhash Chandra, founder promoter of the erstwhile Essel Group.

Chandra’s Zee Entertainment Enterprises is currently fighting a similar takeover battle in the NCLT and the Bombay high court against its largest shareholder Invesco.

Meanwhile, after Dish TV board declined the requisition for EGM, Yes Bank moved to the tribunal seeking a special shareholders meeting.

Appearing for Dish TV, senior counsel Navroz Seervai sought time to file the reply in the matter, stating that the company wanted to respond on “merit, jurisdiction and maintainability”.

Referring to the Bombay high court order in the ZEE Vs Invesco matter, he said, “Yesterday, in a similar matter the Bombay High Court has passed an order. We also want to put that on record. The order clarified that NCLT has no jurisdiction to entertain this kind of plea.”

The bench, headed by Suchitra Kanuparthi and Anuradha Bhatia allowed Dish TV time till November 15 to file its response in the matter and has posted the case for further hearing to November 23.

Senior counsels Darius Khambata and JP Sen, representing Yes Bank in the case, also sought time to file their rejoinder to the Dish TV reply.

The tribunal also allowed the lender to file a response to Dish TV’s reply before the next date of hearing.

The private lender has sought tribunal’s intervention to direct the company to either provide shareholder details – so it can call the meeting on its own – or instruct it to set a date for an EGM.

“Owing to YBL (Yes Bank) being a banking company and its shareholding in the Company (Dish TV) being a consequence of invocation of pledges, there are certain embargos under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 read with Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011, because of which the said resolutions cannot be placed before the shareholders,” said Dish TV in its exchange filing on October 13, at the time of rejecting the requisition request of the bank.

ET, in its September 24 report stated that the dispute between Goel and Yes Bank over corporate governance and fund-raising plans was escalating and was reaching the courts.

The bank wants to dissolve the entire board and removal of the promoter family, as it believes that the board is functioning in cahoots with the minority shareholders (that is the promoters), who should not have representation on the board.

Dish TV, which has been trying to raise funds since some time, had decided to go ahead with a Rs 1,000 crore rights issue to be able to invest for acquiring new customers, in set-top-boxes (STBs) and on marketing and promotions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dispute between Dish TV and Yes Bank escalates over corporate governance, fundraising plans, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A dispute between Jawahar Goel, promoter of the Indian direct-to-home (DTH) service Dish TV, and Yes Bank over corporate governance and fundraising plans appears to be escalating as both sides have dug in their heels.

Yes Bank is seeking to dissolve the entire board and removal of the promoter family, as the bank is said to be of the view that the board is “functioning in cahoots” with the minority shareholders (that is the promoters), who “should not have representation” on the board, sources close to the bank said.

Yes Bank had sent a notice on September 3 for the removal as well as appointment of certain directors on the board of the company.

On Thursday, the bank called for an extraordinary general meeting of the Dish TV shareholders seeking removal of Goel, chairman and MD as well as other existing directors from the board and induction of 7 new directors.

“Yes Bank is well within its rights,” said an official close to the lender. “It should be a professionally-run board. As the largest shareholder, we have the right to dissolve board and instate a new professional board. The new board members should have requisite experience in the area and the promoter family should no longer exercise any control on the board or the company.”

The official also stated that a forensic audit should also be conducted on Dish TV as Yes Bank fears that several related party transactions have not been revealed, which could burn a hole in Dish TVs books.

Officials close to the private lender say that as the largest shareholder, it has the right to dissolve the existing board and place it with a professional one.

But people close to the company are raising questions on the lenders’ course of action and also whether it’s acting as a shareholder or a lender.

A financial investor close to the promoter family said that Yes Bank has been a lender to Dish TV for more than a decade and has always derived comfort on the business operations and financials from the existing management of Dish TV.

“All loans availed by Dish TV from Yes Bank have been repaid in full. However, now Yes Bank is acting in the capacity of shareholder (by virtue of acquiring shares through invocation of certain pledged shares). Dish TV has never been privy to any such borrowing arrangements and neither Yes Bank informed or took prior permission of Dish before granting such loans to borrower entities,” the investor said.

Email queries sent to Dish TV and Yes Bank remained unanswered till press time.

Earlier this week, Dish TV sought an extension of time for holding the annual general meeting of the company that was scheduled to be held on September 27.

“They (Dish TV) are trying to stall to make sure dubious investments don’t come out to the fore. We haven’t been able to access the books of accounts, nor our queries on several related party transactions been answered, these are all stalling tactics,” the official close to the development said.

However, a person close to Dish TV said that Yes Bank is trying to “derail” the ₹1,000-crore rights issue, as it will dilute the bank’s holding.

“The board of Dish TV had observed that in order to support the expansion of business and meet working capital requirements of the company, and also in view of the requirement to pay the licence fee, it was imperative to raise funds,” the person said.

Incidentally, Dish TV has been trying to raise funds through debt. However, due to low credit rating among other factors, it has not received any positive response from any of the banks.

Also, Dish TV has been witnessing 20-24% annual churn in subscribers, and accordingly, needs to acquire set-top-boxes (STBs) to compensate for the churn by acquiring new customers.

“Since majority of the cash flows of the company have been deployed towards debt reduction (to the tune of ₹2,800 crore in last three years), the company has not been able to spend adequate funds for acquiring new customers, either on STBs or on marketing and promotions, which has resulted in loss of market share,” said the person close to the company. Analysts feel that given the business projections and disruption caused by Covid-19 and OTT players, it is evident that Dish TV will be in need of additional funds to operate the business.

“Equal rights is available to all large and small shareholders of in proportion to their existing shareholding; now Yes Bank has to figure out if they want to act as shareholder or a lender,” the person close to the company said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY