How to get back your entire term insurance premium

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Two neighbours’ daily routine of watering plants leads to an interesting conversation

Bindu: These plants give back much more than the time and care we invest in them.

Sindu: Yes. Speaking of giving back, have you heard of the concept of return of premium or ROP in life insurance plans?

Bindu: No. What is it?

Sindu: It is literally what the name means. ROP is where the term plan returns the entire premium paid (excluding tax) during the policy term . A few insurers even return 110-150 per cent of premium paid.

Bindu: Wait. Did you say term plan? Terms plans don’t given any kind of returns to the policyholders. It is a pure risk cover. The policy terminates after the policy term.

Sindu: Yes, exactly. Many policyholders who survive the policy term feel they don’t get anything in return. So for them, term plan with ROP (TROP) variant was introduced.

Bindu: How does it work?

Sindu: Most insurers offer TROP as a rider or optional cover. Upon payment of additional premium, you can buy this cover. Here, you get life cover during the policy term and if you survive the policy term, 100 per cent total premium paid including underwriting extra premium (if any) under the base policy will be paid at the end of the policy term and the policy will terminate.

Bindu: Great! Do we get tax breaks on this as well?

Sindu: Tax benefits available on regular life insurance policies under Section 80C can be availed on ROP term plans too. Maturity benefit, i.e., the premium that is returned, is eligible for tax exemption under Section 10 (10 D). And, unlike the regular term covers, under TROP, the policy becomes paid-up. That is, if you stop paying the premium, the policy will continue to cover you till end of the policy term for a reduced sum assured (SA).

Bindu: Well, this is good!

Sindu: Yes. It appears to be. But hold your horses. There are a few things to keep in mind. One, the premium for this return of premium variant is higher than the plain- vanilla cover. Two, you get only the premium paid for the base cover. That is, if you had opted for any optional or rider covers such as accidental death benefit, critical illness riders or joint life, you will not get back the amount paid. And three, ROP has to be selected at the inception of the policy.

Bindu: Basically, if I don’t mind spending the extra money, then I can go for this cover. It not only protects my family in my absence during the policy term but gives me a financial cushion at the end of the policy term. It is not so bad.

Sindu: True that. But it is still expensive for a term cover. Instead, you can always invest that extra money paid as premium in alternate platforms and consider a plain-vanilla term cover. After all, insurance is for protection.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

FM speaks to IRDAI Chairman on Covid insurance claims

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has said that she had a talk with the Insurance Reguator on the issue of cashless treatment at networked and temporary hospitals for treatment of Covid patients.

In a tweet, the Finance Minister, mentioned “Reports are being received of some hospitals denying cashless insurance. Spoken to Chairman, IRDAI SC Khuntia to act immediately. In March 20 #Covid included as a part of comprehensive health insurance. Cashless available at networked or even temporary hospitals.”

In another tweet, the FM wrote, “As on 20/4/21, over 9 lakh #Covid related claims have been settled by insurance companies for ₹8642 Cr. Even tele-consultations can be covered. IRDAI shall direct companies to prioritise authorisations and settlements of #Covid cases.”

IRDAI issues clarification on cashless claims in Covid-19 cases

Taking a serious note of reports on denial of cashless treatment for eligible Covid-19 patients, the insurance regulator said cashless treatment facility cannot be denied. Business Line had reported this earlier.

“It is clarified that the policyholders are entitled to cashless facility at all such network providers (hospitals) with whom the insurance company/TPA (third party administrator) has entered into an agreement in accordance to the norms of service level agreement (SLA),” the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) said in a circular.

IRDAI allows sale of short term Covid insurance policies till September 30

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IRDAI issues clarification on cashless claims in Covid-19 cases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has clarified that wherever insurers have an arrangement with the hospitals for providing cashless facility, such network hospitals are obligated to provide cashless service for all treatments including treatment for Covid-19.

This clarification comes in the backdrop of some reports that some hospitals are not granting cashless facility for treatment of Covid-19 despite policyholders being entitled for the cashless treatment under their policy.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had earlier held talks with the IRDAI Chairman SC Kunthia on the problems some have faced and the need to address it.

The FM had earlier tweeted, “Reports are being received of some hospitals denying cashless insurance. Spoken to Chairman, IRDAI Shri SC Khuntia to act immediately. In March’20 #Covid included as a part of comprehensive health insurance. Cashless available at networked or even temporary hospitals.”

All the Network Providers (hospitals) who have signed Service Level Agreements (SLA) with general and health insurers have to mandatorily provide cashless facility for any treatment to the policyholders including Covid-19 treatment in accordance with agreed provisions of SLA and terms and conditions of policy contract.

Therefore, all policyholders that are entitled to cashless facility at all such network providers (hospital) with whom the insurance company/TPA has entered into an agreement shall avail the benefit of cashless treatment.

In the event of denial of cashless facility at any such hospitals the aggrieved policyholders may send a complaint to the concerned insurance company. The details and email ids of grievance redressal officers of insurance companies can be accessed from the website of the insurers.

Insurance companies have also been directed to ensure smooth availability of cashless facility with all the network providers (hospitals) empaneled with them by actively interacting with the hospitals.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Third party motor insurance premium may go up in 2021-22

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The general insurance industry is hoping for an increase in third party motor insurance rates for 2021-22.

The rates are notified by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) on an annual basis and had not been changed last year due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The new rates for 2021-22 are yet to be notified by IRDAI.

According to general insurers, the premium needs to be revised in order to make the segment sustainable.

Further, court judgements in the recent past have also had an impact on the sector.

“Our view is that last year we didn’t get a hike in rates . Before that in February 2020, exposure draft for an increase had come but then the first wave of Covid happened and that was put in the cold storage,” Bhargav Dasgupta, Managing Director and CEO, ICICI Lombard, General Insurance, had said after the fourth quarter results in a media call.

Responding to a question, he had also pointed out that court judgements had had an impact, even on past claims. He, however, did not comment on the expected quantum of hike in rates.

The Covid -19 pandemic and lockdown had brought down motor claims in the initial months but they have started coming back to normal, according to insurers.

Meanwhile, industry data indicates some traction in motor insurance premium in recent months.

In 2020-21, motor third party premium increased by 4.4 per cent to ₹10,650 crore compared to ₹ 10,198 crore in 2019-20.

However, on an overall basis, motor premium fell 1.68 per cent to ₹ 67,790 crore last fiscal.

“In 2021-22, along with the expected uptick in the health segment, any increase in the premium levels of the Motor TP segment, which was held steady in 2020-21, could drive the non-life premiums,” Care Ratings had said in a recent report.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How Saral Jeevan Bima fares among term plans

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Term plans are supposed to be simple products in the life insurance space. But life insurers add different features, pay-out options and other conditions, making the selection of a term plan difficult, prompting the regulator, IRDAI, to come up with Saral Jeevan Bima.

The objective of this standard term policy is to offer simple basic life cover for policyholders across income categories. With a few insurers introducing the standard term policy in their menu, we discuss their offerings.

Cost of the cover

Saral Jeevan Bima is a plain vanilla term cover that pays the sum assured (SA) in lump sum to the nominee in case of death of the policyholder during the policy term. The policy is offered for a minimum SA of ₹50,000, up to a maximum of ₹25 lakh.

According to industry experts, the underwriting process is one of the main factors influencing the pricing of these standard products, given that the coverage is the same across insurers. For instance, Saral Jeevan Bima offered by SBI Life would cost a 30-year old individual — with a sum assured of ₹25 lakh — a premium of ₹12,479 per year. SBI Life requires an individual to undertake a physical medical check-up.

On the other hand, PNB Met Life’s premium for the same cover works out to ₹6,278 per year and doesn’t require any medical assessment. Some insurers offer tele medical facility. For instance, ICICI Pru Life, for the same ₹25-lakh cover (30-year individual), conducts a tele medical check-up before issuing the policy and the premium works to ₹9,428 per year. While medical assessment benefits the policyholder (by reducing the chance of rejection of claim in the future on medical grounds), it bumps up the premium.

The pricing of the policy is not only based on medical assessment but also depends on the income category (whether salaried or self-employed), profession and age. The higher your age, the higher will be your premium.

However, if you compare Saral Jeevan Bima with other term plans in the market, the premium seems high. For instance, the premium for Edelweiss Tokio Life’s term plan Zindagi Plus is ₹4,434 for a ₹25-lakh cover (30-year individual), while that for Saral Jeevan Bima under the same insurer works out to ₹8,259.

According to Indraneel Chatterjee, Co-Founder and Principal Officer, RenewBuy, “The premium for the standard product appears relatively high because the other term planscater to individuals usually in higher income brackets, for whom insurers will be in a position to absorb the underwriting costs and risks, given the higher coverage.” The minimum cover offered by most term policies in the market is over ₹25 lakh whereas for the standard product, the maximum coverage is itself only ₹25 lakh. For instance, in SBI Life’s eShield plan, the minimum cover is ₹35 lakh, with no limit for maximum cover.

Chatterjee further adds, “ Saral Jeevan Bima caters to those in the low and mid-income category, mostly self-employed, which explains the stark difference in the premium, though the on-boarding process is simple.”

 

Our take

You can consider this standard term plan for basic protection if you are self-employed or belong to a lower income category.(say, earning less than ₹5 lakh a year)

Though most insurers offer term plan for a minimum cover of ₹30 lakh, a few do offer SA starting at ₹25 lakh, including Max Life, PNB Met Life, Kotak Life and Aegon Life. Then in such cases, it makes sense to compare premium offered by other term plans by the insurer for more or less the same or additional cover.

But remember, as a general rule, it is good to have a cover that is at least 10-25 times your annual income. This should also be reviewed periodically, as and when your income and liabilities increase.

Although two riders — accident death and permanent disability benefit — can be offered with the standard cover, so far, no insurers have offered these.

So, all things considered, do compare the coverage, riders and other features of different offers before signing up a term policy.

For a detailed analysis of Saral Jeevan Bima, look up All you wanted to know about Saral Jeevan Bima (https://tinyurl.com/Saralbima)

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IRDAI must review prohibition on investment in AIF investment overseas

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


While the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India’s (IRDAI) decision to permit insurer’s investments in startups fund of funds is a good move, it needs to review the prohibition on investment in AIFs investing overseas.

According to experts, IRDA should revisit this blanket prohibition in light of the fact that market regulator SEBI permits AIFs to invest up to 25 per cent of the investible funds in overseas securities.

Under applicable insurance laws, an insurance company cannot directly or indirectly invest outside India, and hence IRDA whilst permitting insurer’s investments in FoF has prohibited investment by such an FoF in any AIFs investing overseas.

“However, IRDA should revisit this blanket prohibition in light of the fact that whilst SEBI permits AIFs to invest upto 25 per cent of the investible funds in overseas securities, at the same time SEBI also allows the AIF managers to excuse an investor from participating in any underlying investments, if such participation is not legally permitted for the concerned investor. Hence as long as an AIF can ensure that the monies invested by insurance companies do not even have an indirect overseas investment exposure, the insurer’s direct/indirect participation in such AIFs should be permitted,” said Tejash Chitlangi, Sr. Partner IC Universal Legal Advocates & Solicitors.

In a new notification on Friday, IRDA has allowed insurance companies to make their investments in FoF, subject to the condition that these investments are not made into overseas companies. The government has set up a Fund of Funds for startups with a corpus of ₹10,000 crore. The Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) is the operating agency for the FFS.

In March, the Government had issued a notification allowing private retirement funds to park five per cent of their investible surplus into AIFs. It stated that non-government provident funds, superannuation funds, and gratuity funds to invest in units issued by Category I and Category II AIFs, subject to certain conditions.

Ashley Menezes, Partner and COO, ChrysCapital Advisors, LLP & Chair, Regulatory Affairs Committee, IVCA said the move by IRDA allows insurance companies to derisk their exposure. “However, such capital from insurance companies cannot be utilized by an AIF to make investments outside India and this is a matter that still needs discussion.”

Siddharth Pai, Founding Partner and CFO at 3one4 Capital, Co-Chair at Regulatory Affairs Committee,Indian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (IVCA) said the FOF system is the perfect vehicle in terms of diversification for Indian Institutional Capital and the inability of Insurance Companies, whose annual premium flows is orders of magnitude larger than the entire Indian AIF universe.

“One question that still needs to be answered is whether Insurance companies can invest into AIFs with overseas investments, provided that the amount invested by the Insurance Company into the AIF will not form part of the overseas investment. The inflection point for any startup ecosystem is when domestic institutional capital is allowed to start investing into the local ecosystem. This move by the IRDAI and the move by PFRDA last month shows the government’s intent to accelerate institutional rupee funding to startups, which will help in economic growth and job creation.” Pai said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IRDAI allows insurers to invest in Fund-of-Funds

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a major boost to private equity industry, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has now allowed insurance companies to invest in Fund-of-Funds (FoF) that invest within the country. This move is expected to open more capital raising options for the startup ecosystem in India, fulfilling a longstanding industry demand.

The latest move by the IRDAI comes on the heels of the recent decision of the government to allow domestic private retirement funds to invest upto 5 per cent of their surplus in AIFs.

While insurers can now directly invest in FoF on the lines of their making direct investments in Alternate Investment Funds (AIFs), they are barred from investing in FoFs that invest in overseas companies or funds with overseas exposure, according to a IRDAI circular modifying the guidelines for investment in AIFs. The insurance regulator has also barred insurers from investing in AIFs in which insurer has taken an exposure.

IRDAI has also mandated insurers to obtain a quarterly certificate from a concurrent auditor about their compliance with these conditions and file it along with their quarterly periodical returns.

FoF is an AIF that invests in another AIF. An AIF is basically a vehicle established for the purpose of raising capital from a number of investors with an aim to invest these funds into assets to generate favourable returns.

In its 2017 Master circular, IRDAI had stipulated that no investment will be permitted in AIFs, which are FoFs and leverage funds.

However, now the IRDAI has said that the insurer shall invest only into FoFs which comply with the requirement of Section 27E of the Insurance Act 1938. Section 27E stipulates that no insurer can directly or indirectly invest outside India the funds of the policyholder.

Siddharth Pai, Founding Partner and CFO at 3one4 Capital, Co-Chair at Regulatory Affairs Committee, IVCA said, “IRDAI has fully embraced the Atmanirbhar movement through this new move that allows Insurance Companies to invest into FoFs. This move by the IRDAI and the move by PFRDA last month shows the government’s intent to accelerate institutional rupee funding to startups, which will help in economic growth and job creation.”

The inflection point for any startup ecosystem is when domestic institutional capital is allowed to start investing into the local ecosystem.”

Ashley Menezes, Partner and COO, ChrysCapital Advisors, LLP & Chair, Regulatory Affairs Committee, IVCA said, “It is a huge win for the private equity industry that insurance companies are now permitted to make investments into funds of funds as well, similar to them making a direct investment in an AIF. This allows insurance companies to derisk their exposure. However, such capital from insurance companies cannot be utilized by an AIF to make investments outside India and this is a matter that still needs discussion.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis Bank to become co-promoter of Max Life Insurance, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Axis Bank has become a co-promoter of Max Life Insurance after a regulatory go ahead from the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India (Irda).

The private sector lender will also nominate three representatives to the board of Max Life Insurance post this development. The three representative are Rajiv Anand, Rajesh Dahiya and Subrat Mohanty.

Anand heads the retail banking portfolio of Axis Bank while Dahiya heads multiple functions such as audit, human resources and compliance. Mohanty is the head of banking operations.

Further, two additional independent directors will join the board of Max Life Insurance, according to sources in the know.

“Axis Bank has been a long-term partner to Max Life and together we have contributed to deepening insurance penetration in India over the last decade,” said Amitabh Chaudhry, managing director and chief executive officer, Axis Bank.

Axis Bank had announced its intent to purchase a 30% stake in Max Life Insurance for a sum of around Rs 1,530 crore in April last year. The transaction underwent some tweaks to adhere to Reserve Bank of India and Irda recommendations.

As per the current structure, Axis Banks now owns a 13% stake in the life insurer with the option to increase its stake to 20%.

“The conclusion of this transaction will bring added strength to Max Life and help it chart a new growth trajectory by combining the forces of the third largest private bank in India and the fourth largest private life insurer in the country,” said Analjit Singh, chairman of Max Group and Max Financial Services.

Max Financial Services, a listed company, owns around 87% stake in Max Life Insurance. The remaining stake is held by Axis Bank.

Analjit Singh and his family own a 17.3% stake in Max Financial Services. Mitsui Sumitomo owns around 20% stake in Max Financial after it swapped its stake in the life insurance arm with a stake in the parent company in December.

Max Life Insurance’s growth has outpaced its private sector peers in the first nine months of 2020-21.

The company has reportedly grown its individual adjusted new sales at 14% during this period.

“Axis Bank’s role as a co-promoter de-risks the business because 60% of our sales are contributed by the bank. That is one of the major positive outcomes of this transaction,” said Prashant Tripathy, chief executive officer, Max Life Insurance.

The insurance sector has witnessed sporadic deal making in the past 12 months. IDBI Bank sold its stake in its joint venture with Belgian life insurer Ageas and Federal Bank in a recent development. Ageas acquired IDBI’s Bank’s stake to consolidate its holding. Axa has also put its stake in an insurance broking JV with Mahindra group on the block.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Offloading of LIC stake in IDBI Bank will hit policyholders’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All-India IDBI Officers’ Association has cautioned that any move by the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India to offload the stake held in IDBI Bank could hurt the interests of policyholders of LIC. The public sector life insurer was permitted to acquire up to 51 per cent equity in IDBI Bank, breaching the cap of 15 per cent originally stipulated for such transactions.

In a letter to the Chairman, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), Vithal Koteswara Rao AV, General Secretary of the Association, said that various reports in the media have suggested that LIC has been making repeated efforts to offload the stake it holds in IDBI Bank.

Also read: We will try to grow our business in a very calibrated way: IDBI Bank CEO

Loss may be distributed

Any loss that the LIC incurs in the transaction will, in turn, be distributed among the policyholders while declaring bonuses. The stake it holds in the bank was purchased at an average price per share of about ₹60 in 2019 whereas the current market price of the IDBI Bank share is at ₹40, Rao said.

The LIC of India holds 529,41,02,939 shares of IDBI Bank currently. When seen in absolute terms, the deal, if allowed to go through, will cause a loss that could runs into several thousands of crores, Rao said in the letter. It will only force the policyholders of the LIC to bear the brunt of this humongous loss.

“As most of our members are also policyholders of the LIC, we are obliged to make this request on behalf of our members to arrange to initiate suitable measures to see that none of the policyholders is subjected to any financial loss when the LIC seeks to pare the stake it now holds in IDBI Bank,” the letter said.

Series of worrying events

The Association expressed its worry over a series of events initiated with the acquisition of 51 per cent of stake in IDBI Bank in January 2019, followed by an announcement by the Reserve Bank in March that year that the status of IDBI Bank stands changed from a public sector bank to a private bank.

The next was the unilateral modification of service conditions of IDBI Bank officers by the management linking their performance with prospective termination, which the Association feels has been made with a clear intention of subjecting them to victimisation ‘as per the whims and fancies of the management’.

The Union Finance Minister’s observation that interests of the workforce of any public sector bank being privatised would be protected, attracts interest. But the ground reality prevailing at the bank versus the Finance Minister’s pronouncement are contradictory, the Association says.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Product Review: Aditya Birla Activ Health policy is value for money

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Aditya Birla Health recently introduced Activ Health policy, an enhanced version of its existing policy with the same name. While the coverage in the policy almost similar to its older version, there are a few new features.

New features

The newly launched Activ Health (an improved version of the same policy) is a comprehensive indemnity health plan offering sum insured (SI) of ₹2 lakh to ₹2 crore. While the same SI range was offered in the earlier version as well, there are a few notable new features.

In this new Activ Health, room rent for all kinds of hospital rooms is covered up to the SI, similar to other indemnity health plans in the market. But in the previous version, co-pay was applicable. Another key feature that is unique to this new product is that the premium is waived, at the renewal, if the policyholder is diagnosed with a critical illness (once).

Also, in its earlier version of Activ Health, the policy offered about 30 per cent discount on premium for staying fit. Now, in the new version, 100 per cent premium can be adjusted with the health returns. But you as a policyholder should earn points (health returns) through accumulation of Active dayz. For instance, one Active dayz can be earned by 10,000 steps or more in a day or burning 300 calories or more in a day. So if you earn, say, 325 Active Dayz in a year by walking, then the entire health returns can be adjusted with premium payment. It also covers inpatient treatment under AYUSH that allows you to opt for Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy treatments which was not available in the previous version.

Both the old and the new policy covers for a few chronic diseases including hypertension, blood pressure and diabetes from day one. Under its chronic management programme which forms a part of the plan – where an individual has undergone a pre-policy medical examination and is found to be suffering from covered chronic conditions, then day one coverage is offered. In the earlier policy, however the hospitalisation came with a waiting period of 90 days. But in the enhanced version hospitalisation expenses for such diseases will be covered without any waiting period (90 days).

Other features of Activ Health plan include coverage for in-patient hospitalisation, OPD, recovery benefit (where the insurer pays fixed benefit for 10 consecutive days of hospitalisation due to accident), day care treatment (covered up to SI) and sum insured reload benefit and cumulative bonus benefits. The plan also provides coverage for Covid-19 and personal protective equipment (PPE) kit, gloves and oxygen masks. There is no co-pay for zone wise premium (policyholder pays premium as per the treatment cost prevailing in the city he/she resides) too for SI over and above ₹4 lakh.

Points to note

Activ Health’s reload feature offers to reinstate your SI even if it is partially or fully exhausted. But it is available only once during the policy year up to SI. But on the other hand, if you go for Activ Health’s Premiere variant, then this feature is available for multiple claims. Also, the pre and post hospitalisation expenses are covered for 60 days and 180 days respectively for this new plan unlike Aditya Birla Health insurer’s other product like Assure Diamond where it is 30 and 60 days respectively.

Also, another point to note is that, if an individual has taken a policy without medical examination (pre-policy medical check-up), but later finds that he/she has one of the chronic conditions, then the waiting period of 24 months applies. One should be aware that the pre-existing disease waiting period is between 36 and 48 months. But there are policies in the market with shorter waiting period including Digit Health Insurance’s Health Care Plus and ICICI Lombard’s iHealth Plus.

Keep in mind, that, policyholders have to undergo initial waiting period of 30 days.

Premium comparison

The new Activ Health is better compared to its previous version as also the insurer’s other plans like Assure Diamond. However, there are other products too in the market with more or less similar features. Max Bupa’s ReAssure plan is one such. For a 30-year individual, for a SI of ₹ 10 lakh, the premium works out to be ₹7690 (excluding tax) per year, while in Max Bupa’s ReAssure plan, the premium works out to be ₹7755 (excluding GST) per year.

Those in the previous version of Activ Health can be upgraded to the new version at the time of renewal. The premium too works out to be lower in the new version. Sample this, for a 30-yr individual, for ₹10 lakh SI, the premium works out to ₹7690 (excluding GST) but the premium for the same policy in its previous version is around ₹8307 (excluding GST).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5