I-T department probes into alleged irregularities at Urban Credit Cooperative Bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Income Tax Department has started investigations into alleged irregularities at Urban Credit Cooperative Bank located in Maharashtra. The tax department said more than 1,200 new bank accounts were opened by the bank without the Permanent Account Number (PAN).

The investigations have revealed that these bank accounts were opened without following KYC norms and all account opening forms were filled in by the bank staff and they have put their signature/thumb impressions.

The tax department carried out search and seizure operations on October 27 at the headquarters and one of the branches of the bank. The residence of the Chairman and one of its directors were also covered.

The analysis of bank data on Core Banking Solutions (CBS) and the statements of key persons recorded during the search operation have revealed the glaring irregularities in opening the bank accounts.

In these accounts, multiple cash deposits each of exact denomination of ₹1.9 lakh, were made totalling to ₹53.72 crore. Out of these, more than 700 bank accounts have been identified which were opened in series, where cash deposits of more than ₹34.10 crore were made within 7 days of opening of bank accounts, mainly between August 2020 and May 2021.

These deposits have been structured to avoid mandatory PAN requirement for cash deposits over ₹2 lakh. The money was subsequently converted into fixed deposits in the same branch.

Local enquiries in few cases of such account holders, have demonstrated that these persons are not aware of cash deposits in the bank and categorically denied any knowledge of such bank accounts or even the fixed deposits.

“The Chairman, CMD and the manager of the branch, could not explain the source of cash deposits and accepted that these were done at the behest of one of the directors of the bank, who is a prominent local businessman engaged in trading of grains,” the Income Tax Department said in a statement.

On the basis of evidence gathered and statements recorded, the entire amount of ₹53.72 crore has been restrained.

Further investigations are in progress.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IT department freezes Rs 53-crore deposits of Maharashtra-based urban cooperative bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Income Tax Department has frozen deposits worth over Rs 53 crore of an urban credit cooperative bank in Maharashtra after it found “glaring irregularities” in the opening of accounts in a recent raid, the CBDT said on Saturday. The department raided the headquarters of the bank and the residence of its chairman and a director on October 27, it said.

While the official statement did not name the searched entity, sources identified it as Buldana Urban Cooperative Credit bank.

“The analysis of bank data on core banking solutions (CBS) and the statements of key persons recorded during the search action have revealed glaring irregularities in opening the bank accounts.

“More than 1,200 new bank accounts were opened in the said branch without PAN (permanent account number),” the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which frames policy for the tax department, said in a statement.

The investigations, it said, found that these bank accounts were opened “without following KYC (know your customer) norms and all account opening forms are filled in by the bank staff and they have put their signature/thumb impressions”.

The department alleged that multiple cash deposits of “exact” denomination of Rs 1.9 lakh each were made and they totalled Rs 53.72 crore.

“Out of these, more than 700 bank accounts have been identified which were opened in a series where cash deposits of more than Rs 34.10 crore were made immediately within seven days of the opening of bank accounts, mainly during the period August 2020-May 2021,” it said.

“These deposits have been structured to avoid the mandatory PAN requirement for cash deposits over Rs 2 lakh,” it added.

The money was subsequently converted into fixed deposits in the same branch, the statement claimed.

The CBDT said enquiries in a few cases of such account holders showed that they were “not aware of cash deposits in the bank and categorically denied any knowledge of such bank accounts or even the fixed deposits”.

“The chairman, CMD and the manager of the branch, could not explain the source of cash deposits and accepted that these were done at the behest of one of the directors of the bank, who is a prominent local businessman engaged in trading of grains.

“On the basis of the evidences gathered and statements recorded, the entire amount of Rs 53.72 crore has been restrained,” the statement said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman lays foundation for Income Tax office building, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday laid the foundation for the office building of the Income Tax Department in Bengaluru, which officials said, would be one of its kind, oriented to harness maximum natural lighting and GRIHA rating IV compliant. The building has provision for solar panels for power generation and a Rain Water Harvesting system, they said.

Recycled water will be used for gardening and dual plumbing. The Central Air Cleaning system will be equipped with magnetic filter and UV-Ray Sterilization, officials said, adding the building will be constructed by the Bengaluru Project Circle of the Central Public Works Department.

The officials said the state-of-the art building will comprise an exclusive public relations office to address grievances on priority and a waiting lounge for tax payers.

It also houses Aaykar Seva Kendra for providing hassle free taxpayer services. This centrally located office building is taxpayer friendly. Design and space allocation of the building provides congenial working environment for officers and staff of Income Tax Department, they said.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How banks, mutual funds and companies will check if you have filed ITR, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Effective from July 1, 2021, a person who has not filed ITR for the previous two financial years and the aggregate TDS and TCS deducted from payments made to him/her in each of these financial years exceeds Rs 50,000, then such person would be subjected to higher TDS rate.

Deductors of TDS/TCS like banks, mutual fund houses etc can now check if you have filed ITR when your income crosses the TDS limit from July 1, and levy two times the TDS amount if you haven’t filed your tax return. For this purpose, the income tax department has launched a compliance check utility for tax deductors on the department’s reporting portal. Further, the tax department has prepared a list with names of taxpayers who have not filed their ITRs for the previous two fiscals, which can be used by deductors.

Here is a look at how financial institutions will check if individuals have filed ITR or not to see if higher tax has to be deducted from their income. Also, what a taxpayer can do if their name appears on the list of those who haven’t filed ITRs for the previous two years.

When will higher TDS/TCS be levied?
As per the announcement made in Budget 2021, if an individual satisfies the following conditions, then he/she will be subjected to higher TDS/TCS rate:
a) If the individual has not filed income tax return in the two previous financial years for which due date has expired as per section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and
b) Sum of TDS and TCS in each of the financial years is more than Rs 50,000

Chartered Accountant Naveen Wadhwa, DGM, Taxmann.com says, “If for the relevant financial years an individual has filed belated ITR or filed ITR in response to a notice from tax department, then Section 206AB would not be applicable. It would mean that higher TDS would not be deducted on incomes.”

Compliance check utility for sections 206AB and 206CCA
As mentioned above, a compliance check utility has been launched on the income tax department’s reporting portal: https://report.insight.gov.in/reporting-webapp/portal/homePage.

Here, if an individual comes under the purview of TDS, i.e., his income exceeds the specified limit, then the financial institution such as bank, mutual fund etc., would check if the tax on the income accrued would be deducted either at the normal rate (if the above-mentioned conditions are not satisfied) or at higher rate as mentioned in the newly enacted law.

For instance, if the interest income from fixed deposit during the FY 2021-22 exceeds Rs 40,000 in a financial year, then tax would be deducted on the interest income.

As per the circular, the tax deductor or collector can enter single PAN or multiple PANs of the deductee or collectee on the reporting portal. The deductor or collector will get a response from the reporting portal if the TDS on income of such a person would be deducted at a higher rate.

As per the functionality offered on the reporting portal, a list of persons is prepared by the tax department at the start of the financial year 2021-22. This contains name of taxpayers who have not filed ITR in the previous years, i.e., 2018-19 and 2019-20. These two financial years are taken as the relevant previous years where ITR was not filed and aggregate of TDS and TCS exceeded Rs 50,000 in each of the financial years.

Can your name be removed from the list?
The tax department’s June 22, 2021 circular states that if the specified person, i.e., the person whose name has appears on the list, files ITRs for FY 2018-19 and 2019-20 during the financial year 2021-22, then his name would be removed from the list. Wadhwa says, “The due date of filing ITR for FY 2018-19 and 2019-20 has expired on 30-11-2020 and 10-01-2021 respectively. Thus, an individual cannot file ITR now, unless a notice is received from the income tax department to file ITR.”

If the taxpayer files valid ITR (i.e., filed and verified) for FY 2020-21, then his/her name would be removed from the list. Wadhwa says, “A taxpayer should ensure that once ITR is filed, it is immediately verified. The name from the list on the reporting portal would be removed either once the due date has expired (i.e., after September 30, 2021) or date of filing valid return (filed & verified), whichever is later. Thus, if you have filed and verified ITR before the expiry date (September 30, 2021 for FY 2020-21), then your name would be removed after the expiry of deadline. However, if you file your ITR, say on September 25, 2021, and verify it on say October 15, 2021, then name from the list would be removed from the list after October 15, 2021.” As per income tax laws, a taxpayer can verify his/her return within 120 days of filing ITR.

However, no new names would be added to the list. Wadhwa says, “This would mean that banks, mutual funds or any other deductor would check only once during the FY 2020-21 at the time of deducting taxes from the income accrued. If the name does not appear on the list, then such deductor would continue to deduct taxes at normal rates throughout the year. However, if higher TDS is applicable and ITR for FY2020-21 is filed during the year, then individual would have to inform the deductor, i.e., bank, mutual fund etc. to check the list again after filing ITR and deduct TDS at normal rate.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Experts say that tax charter is old wine in new bottle

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Last week, the Centre announced a new Taxpayer Charter that lists out an income taxpayer’s rights and obligations. Other countries like UK and Australia also have similar taxpayer charters that spell out the rights and obligations of taxpayers.

“What the Taxpayer Charter is trying to do is to emphasise that the tax department trusts the taxpayers,” says Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP. “That is what it is basically meant to do. There does not seem to be anything new in this. Most of the elements have been spoken of in the past by the previous finance ministers.”

Australia and UK have strived to codify their tax charters into an institutional philosophy on how their revenue collecting agencies deal with taxpayers. There are frequent reviews of the implementation of their taxpayer charter by these countries.

In India’s case, there has been no such announcement yet other than a one-page enumerating rights and obligations of a taxpayer, nor does it stem from any legal provision in the Income Tax Act, 1962. The announcement of the charter seems to be an attempt to tone down the adversarial approach that the Income Tax Department has taken in the past with taxpayers. How this works with the new faceless assessment and appeal scheme has to be seen.

“There is a statement (in the charter) to treat the taxpayers as honest,” says Saraswathi Kasturirangan, Partner at Deloitte India. “I can quote this, if I feel that the queries that are being raised (by Income Tax officials) are vindictive and not a positive approach.”

Revenue targets

A lawyer, who represents the Income Tax Department in court cases, said revenue targets for income tax officials will deter any meaningful change to the taxpayer’s experience in their dealings with the department.

Saraswathi Kasturirangan of Deloitte India feels that compliance with the Taxpayer Charter is something the Income Tax Department should expect from its officers to make sure that it is adhered to, along with stiff revenue targets.

The practice of high revenue targets has already been flagged by the Comptroller and Auditor General in a 2018 report on the Income Tax Department. This has led to the value of disputed tax demand cases touching nearly ₹10-lakh crore.

“What the government is doing is to make a clear statement of intent,” adds Jhunjhunwala of Nangia. “However, on the ground, it needs to be seen if officers are still driven by revenue targets”.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY