Banks make Rs 9,700 crore on hidden forex markups in 2020, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks made Rs 9,700 crore in hidden exchange rate markups on currency conversions, payments and card sales and Rs 16,600 crore on forex transaction fees in 2020, according to a new study.

While the overall amount Indians have spent on transaction fees for sending money abroad has decreased over the past five years, the fees paid to exchange rate margins are growing. “This highlights lack of transparency in remittance fee structures, putting consumers at risk of hidden fees as they unknowingly pay more than advertised for the remittance service in the form of a marked up exchange rate,” said Wise, which released the study.

Undisclosed markup

The upfront fee can vary but would often not represent the total cost of the transaction as traditional banks and providers tend to add an undisclosed markup on the exchange rate, instead of using the fair, mid-market rate. The difference between the rates results in a hidden fee unnecessarily costs people a lot more when sending money abroad.

Fee reduction

Banks have been reducing the fees on foreign remittances and their income under this head fell from Rs 15,017 crore in 2016 to Rs 12,142 crore in 2019.

However, they have protected themselves by recovering Rs 4,422 crore through exchange mark-up in 2020, which was up from Rs 2,505 crore in 2016.

These figures were from independent research carried out by Capital Economics in August 2021, which aimed to estimate the scale of foreign exchange transaction fees in India.

Overseas workers lose

Overseas workers sending money to India are also losing money. Over the past five years, money lost to exchange rate margins on inward remittances has grown from Rs 4,200 crore to Rs 7,900 crore. Meanwhile, fees paid to transaction costs have grown from Rs 10,200 crore in 2016 to Rs 14,000 crore in 2020.

Banks make Rs 9,700 crore on hidden forex markups in 2020

Of total fees paid on inward remittances to India in 2020, Saudi Arabia ranked first at 24%, followed by the US (18%), the UK (15%), Qatar (8%), Canada (6%), Oman (5%), (5%), Kuwait (5%), and Australia (4%).

Indian consumers spending abroad paid Rs 1,441 crore as transactions fees, of which Rs 1,303 crore were hidden charges in the form of exchange mark-up.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UCO Bank Q2 net zooms 583% to ₹205 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Riding on the back of a higher growth in net interest income and lower provisions, UCO Bank registered nearly 583 per cent rise in net profit at ₹205 crore for the quarter ended September 30, 2021, compared with ₹30 crore in the same period last year.

Net interest income (NII) grew by 15 per cent to ₹1,598 crore during the quarter under review, against ₹1,394 crore same period last year.

Provisions during the quarter came down by nearly 22 per cent to ₹1,019 crore (₹1,301 crore).

UCO Bank sees ‘improved investor appetite’

Out of PCA framework

The bank had recently come out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) measure of Reserve Bank of India following the compliance of norms by maintaining minimum regulatory capital, net NPA, and leverage ratio on an ongoing basis.

RBI takes UCO Bank out of PCA framework

The operating profit increased by 24 per cent at ₹1,334 crore (₹1,076 crore).

Gross non-performing asset (NPA) as a percentage of total advances declined to 8.98 per cent (11.62 per cent); while net NPA came down to 3.37 per cent (3.63 per cent).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CSB Bank Q2 net jumps 72% on income growth

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


CSB Bank reported a 72 per cent year-on-year (yoy) jump in second quarter net profit at ₹119 crore due to healthy growth in net interest income and other income, and write-back in total provisions.

The Thrissur (Kerala)-headquartered bank had recorded a net profit of ₹69 crore in the year ago quarter.

Net interest income (the difference between interest earned and interest expended) was up 21 per cent yoy at ₹278 crore (₹229 crore in the year ago quarter).

Other income, including fees earned from providing services to customers, commission from non-fund based banking activities, earning from foreign exchange transactions, selling of third-party products, profit on sale of investments (net), etc., rose about 36 per cent yoy to ₹60 crore (₹44 crore).

The bank saw a write-back of ₹9.2 crore in total provisions, including towards non-perfoming assets (NPAs) in the reportng quarter. In the year ago quarter, it made provisions aggregating ₹26.90 crore in the year ago quarter.

As of September-end, total advances grew 12.57 per cent yoy to ₹15,097 crore.

Growth in advances

The growth was mainly on the back of increase in agriculture & microfinance industry loans, gold loans, corporate loans, two-wheeler loans, new MSME loans. However, retail loans, MSME general loans and assignment loans saw a decline.

Total deposits were up 9.09 per cent to ₹19,055 crore. The proportion of low-cost current account, savings account (CASA) deposits in total deposits improved to 32.60 per cent (29.39 per cent as at September-end 2020). During the reporting quarter, fresh slippages were lower at ₹205 crore (of which ₹170 crore is on account of gold loans) against ₹435 crore in the first quarter.

Non-performing asset (NPA) reduction, including via upgradation and recoveries, was higher at ₹305 crore (₹142 crore in the preceding quarter).

CVR Rajendran, Managing Director & CEO, said: “…in terms of profitability, Q2 is a much better quarter than Q1FY22…Lot of good work has gone in managing the portfolio stress both in gold and non- gold portfolios and SMA (special mention accounts)/NPA levels were kept under control.”

He observed that CSB Bank saw return of demand in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), SME and Whole Sale Banking segments during the last part of the quarter. Further, visible growth is also happening in Gold loan portfolio.

As the impact of Covid is not fully ascertained, the bank decided to continue with the accelerated provisioning policy for stressed and NPA accounts, Rajendran said.

BK Divakara, CFO, emphasised that this is the first time that the bank has posted over ₹100 crore profit in a quarter. Net interest margin improved to 5.22 per cent, from 4.48 per cent in the year ago quarter.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDBI Bank Q2 results: Net profit up 75%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


IDBI Bank reported a 75 per cent year-on-year (yoy) increase in second quarter standalone net profit at ₹567crore, supported by a huge write-back in provisions for non-performing assets (NPAs) and lower tax expense.

The Bank had posted a net profit of ₹324 crore in the year ago quarter.

Net interest income increased 9 per cent yoy in the reporting quarter to ₹1,854 crore (₹1,694 crore in the year ago quarter).

Other income, including income from non-fund based banking activities such as commission, fees, earnings from foreign exchange and derivative transactions, and profit and loss from sale of investment, declined about 4 per cent yoy at ₹846 crore (₹881 crore).

The received a write-back of ₹1,426 crore in provisions for NPAs against ₹165 crore in the year ago quarter. Tax expense burden was lower at ₹215 crore (₹347 crore).

As at September-end 2021, gross advances barely nudged up to ₹1,64,506 crore (₹1,63,841 crore as at September-end 2020).

Rakesh Sharma, MD & CEO, said the Bank has built up a sanctions pipeline in the mid and large corporate segments and disbursals are expected to pick up from year-end onwards.

The Bank expects to grow its corporate loan book by about ₹6,000 crore in the current financial year.

Samuel Joseph, Deputy Managing Director, said the Bank has an exposure of about ₹400 crore to the SREI group, which is undergoing corporate insolvency resolution process, and has made 100 per cent provision towards this exposure. IDBI Bank recovered ₹196 crore from DHFL.

P Sitaram, CFO, emphasised that the Bank will grow the corporate loan book even as the emphasis will continue to be on structured retail loans.

Gross NPAs declined about ₹1,186 crore during the reporting quarter to ₹34,408 crore.

Gross NPAs as a percentage of gross advances declined to 20.92 per cent against 21.48 per cent in the preceding quarter. Net NPAs, however, nudged up to 1.62 per cent of net advances against 1.56 per cent.

Fresh slippages rose by ₹1,438 crore (₹1,332 crore in the first quarter). The Bank settled NPAs aggregating ₹1,436 crore (₹587 crore).

ends

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How InvIT, REIT income is taxed

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Over the last few years, infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs) have emerged as a popular investment option for those who want a regular income flow and are comfortable with taking on some risk.

The soaring equity market valuations and dwindling fixed income returns have only added to their appeal. With the government laying out a roadmap for monetisation of infrastructure assets, InvITs are expected to gain further ground.

An InvIT/ REIT pools money from investors (unitholders) to invest in a portfolio of income-generating infrastructure assets (80 per cent in operational assets) via subsidiaries (SPVs). REITs invest in real estate projects and InvITs in infrastructure assets, such as power transmission or road projects. The unitholders receive a regular payout, at least once every six months. Also, as units of publicly issued InvITs/REITs trade like shares on the exchanges, they offer an opportunity for capital appreciation.

Investors, however, need to wade through their complex taxation. The income of an InvIT/ REIT is passed on to unitholders in the form in which it’s received and is taxed as such.

Distributable surplus

An InvIT/ REIT receives cash flows from its project SPVs in the form of: a) dividends in return for the stake held b) interest and c) principal repayment on loans extended to them. Any other income at the InvIT/ REIT level such as capital gains from assets sold and not re-invested, and return on surplus cash invested, too, gets added to this.

Apart from this, if a REIT holds any real estate asset directly and not via an SPV, then the income flows to it in the form of rent (and not interest and dividend) and gets added as such.

All expenses incurred at the InvIT/ REIT level are deducted from the total cash inflow to arrive at the net distributable surplus (NDS). Unitholders must be paid at least 90 per cent of the NDS. A break-up of the components of the distribution is usually available on the websites/ presentations of the respective InvIT/ REIT.

Tax treatment

Distribution: The interest component of the NDS is taxed at your income tax slab rate. The dividend, too, is taxed at your slab rate if the project SPVs of the InvIT/ REIT have opted for the new concessional tax regime under section 115BAA of the IT Act. The dividend is tax-exempt if the project SPVs have not opted for the concessional tax.

Also as Hemal Mehta, Partner, Deloitte India, explains, before the interest and dividend are paid out, a 10 per cent withholding tax (for resident investors) is deducted by the InvIT/ REIT, against which the investor can claim credit.

The loan repayment component represents return of capital and is not subject to tax. Any other income at the InvIT/ REIT level such as capital gains on any asset sold or interest on fixed deposits which is passed on to the unitholders, too, is tax-exempt in their hands.

Powergrid InvIT, India Grid Trust and IRB InvIT Fund are the three publicly listed InvITs open to retail investors.

IRB InvIT Fund has distributed ₹41.30 per unit (₹30 as interest and ₹11.30 as return of capital) since its listing in May 2017 until March 31, 2021. Since most of the trust’s SPVs are loss-making (PAT level), there have been no dividends.

In case of India Grid Trust, almost all the distributions since its listing in June 2017 have been in the form of interest income. As of June 2021, India Grid Trust had opted for concessional tax for all except one of its SPVs. Any future distributions in the form of dividends will, therefore, be taxed accordingly.

Powergrid InvIT, which listed recently has not yet made any distributions. Four of the InvIT’s five project SPVs have opted for concessional tax.

In the REIT space, you have Embassy Office Parks REIT, Mindspace Business Parks REIT and Brookfield India Real Estate Trust, all publicly listed.

In the June 2021 quarter, they distributed ₹5.64, ₹4.60 and ₹6 per unit, respectively of which 80 per cent, 92 per cent and 24 per cent was tax-free in the hands of the investors.

Capital gains: If a unitholder sells his/her InvIT/ REIT units after holding them for up to 36 months, the short-term capital gains are taxed at 15 per cent (plus applicable surcharge and cess) without indexation benefit.

If the units are sold after being held for over 36 months, long-term capital gains (exceeding ₹1 lakh a year including from all equity investments) are taxed at 10 per cent (plus applicable surcharge and cess) without indexation benefit.

These rates are applicable to all REITs (which have to be mandatorily listed) and the listed InvITs.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Here is a beginner’s guide to ‘FIRE’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


‘Freedom to retire early’ — the biggest aspiration of the BL Portfolio Survey respondents — strikes a chord with the ‘FIRE’ or ‘Financial Independence, Retire Early’ movement in the US.

At its core, ‘FIRE’ is all about building a nest egg and hanging up your boots much before the traditional retirement age. We take a closer look at this trend.

What is it

The origin of FIRE is vaguely traced to the 1992 book ‘Your Money or Your Life’ by Vicki Robin and Joe Dominguez. The book encourages one to reassess one’s relationship with money, pointing out that ‘we are sacrificing our lives for money, but it is happening so slowly that we barely notice’. Salary/money is something that an individual earns for time spent. Having a clear understanding of relationship with money would ensure an optimum trade-off between time and money (implying, money earned which in turn gets spent or saved).

The FIRE movement, which started gaining traction soon after the global financial crisis of 2007, requires following a disciplined approach of saving aggressively and starting to invest from a young age in a prudential manner.

Proponents recommend even saving as high as 75 per cent of one’s income to retire very early. The objective is to reach a level of savings that will yield sufficient returns in the form of dividends, interest income or rental income with which one can meet living expenses comfortably. At this point, one has the freedom to choose whether one wants to work, or take up only gigs that give one happiness or are in sync with one’s passion.

Some withdrawal from the capital ie the principal amount can also be factored to meet living expenses. This, however, comes with risks in today’s world where average life span is getting extended, and one should not run the risk of falling short of financial resources at a later stage in life, when one might not be able to work.

Ideal corpus

Based on current living standards and investment return prospects in the US, those in the FIRE bandwagon there follow something known as the ‘4 per cent rule’. One’s total yearly living expenses is multiplied by 25; if it is possible to earn a 4 per cent annual yield on that from investments, then one can quit their job, according to their mantra. A yield below 4 per cent with rest withdrawn from principal also might be fine, according to some proponents, since some of the corpus might appreciate over time, but this comes with risks.

When it comes to planning for a similar objective for a FIRE aspirant in India, two important factors imply the multiple applied to yearly living expenses may need to be higher than 25 — high inflation and low yields.

India has historically had much higher inflation than the US, which means one’s savings erode faster over a period of time. India goes through periods of negative real interest rates (inflation higher than interest rate) like in the last year, denting the real income of retirees preferring safe investment options. Hence, a yield of higher than 4 per cent may be needed on savings.

Besides, rental yields and dividend yields in India are much lower than that in developed markets (Nifty 50 dividend yield at 1 per cent versus Dow Jones Index dividend yield at near 2 per cent). Hence, focussing entirely on capital appreciation and withdrawing from principal to make up for the lower yield presents a risky proposition, warranting a higher multiple to yearly expenses.

Hence, other factors such as frugal living and wise investing may be required to get this dream of early retirement closer to reality.

Takeaways

Finally, if you want to be on the FIRE bandwagon, here are three things that you can do, which also form the core of the FIRE movement:

One, spending only on what is essential — not indulging in excessive consumerism and thereby devaluing your own effort. It was your effort that earned you the money and spending that money without much thought devalues the effort. Tempering down on consumerism also comes with positive consequences for the environment which appears be a cause important to millennials.

Two, saving wisely — investing in a prudential and judicious manner that can grow your corpus optimally and also give you comfort, confidence, and peace of mind .

Three, valuing the time that you spend at work — when one realises that money is a by-product of how one spends his/her time, then one gets more conscious of making use of that time more productively. Following the first two principles would help you choose a job you may like. At the same time, when you realise that your savings and spends which will help you reach your goal is a function of your time at work, you will also begin utilising that time more effectively.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UBI net profit soars by 255% at ₹1,181 cr

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Union Bank of India (UBI) soared 255 per cent year-on-year (yoy) in the first quarter standalone net profit at ₹1,181 crore on the back of robust growth in other income.

The Bank had reported a net profit of ₹333 crore in the year ago quarter.

In the first quarter ended June 30, 2021, net interest income (NII) was up about 9.50 per cent yoy to ₹7,013 crore (₹6,403 crore in the year ago quarter). 

Other income, comprising income from activities such as commission, fees, earnings from foreign exchange and derivative transactions, profit and loss from sale of investment and recoveries from written off accounts, jumped 98 per cent yoy to  ₹2,901 crore (₹1,462 crore). 

Slippages in the reporting quarter were higher at  ₹7,049 crore (₹1,750 crore in the year ago quarter). MSMEs accounted for 45 per cent of the total slippages, followed by ”large corporate & others” and agriculture (about 20 per cent) and retail loans account (15 per cent).  

Loan loss provisions nudged up a tad to ₹2,492 crore (₹2,451 crore). Standard assets provisions soared 167 per cent to ₹1,096 crore (₹410 crore).

Rajkiran Rai G, MD & CEO, said the Bank expects reduction in gross non-performing assets (NPAs) through recovery & upgradation at ₹13,000 crore, including ₹5,600 crore via the National Company Law Tribunal route, in FY22. In the reporting quarter, the recovery & upgradation was at ₹4,341 crore.

The Bank identified 17 accounts aggregating about ₹7,700 crore so far to transfer to the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.

Gross NPAs declined to 13.60 per cent of gross advances as at June-end 2021 against 14.95 per cent as at June-end 2020.

Net NPA position, however, improved to 4.69 per cent of net advances as at June-end 2021 against 4.97 per cent as at June-end 2020.

Total deposits increased by 1.79 per cent yoy to ₹9,08,528 crore, with low-cost current account, savings account (CASA) deposits proportion in domestic deposits rising to 36.39 per cent from 33.30 per cent as on June-end 2020. 

Gross advances declined 0.77 per cent yoy to ₹6,45,091 crore. Within this, domestic advances edged up 0.16 per cent yoy to ₹6,30,237 crore and overseas advances declining 29 per cent yoy to ₹14,854 crore.

Global net interest margin rose to 3.08 per cent from 2.78 per cent in the year ago quarter.

 

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Canara Bank reports 190% net profit jump in Q1

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Canara Bank reported a 190 per cent jump in first quarter net profit at ₹1,177 crore on the back of a robust non-interest income and decline in loan loss provisions.

The Bengaluru-headquartered public sector bank had reported a net profit of ₹406 crore in the year ago period.

Net interest income (the difference between interest earned and interest expended) was a tad higher at ₹6,147 crore ( ₹6,096 crore in the year ago quarter) as the decline in interest expenses was much more than the reduction in interest earned.

Non-interest income, comprising fee-based income, trading income and recovery in written-off accounts rose 67 per cent year-on-year (y-o-y) to ₹4,438 crore ( ₹2,650 crore).

Fee-based income was boosted due to the sale of 1,20 lakh units under Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), and earned the bank a commission income of ₹699 crore. Recovery in written-off accounts soared 132 per cent y-o-y to ₹600 crore ( ₹259 crore).

Fresh slippages in the reporting quarter were higher at ₹4,253 crore against ₹1,422 crore in the year ago quarter. However, slippages were lower vis-a-vis January-March 2021 quarter at ₹14,495 crore.

Net interest margin (net interest income/ average interest earning assets) was lower at 2.71 per cent as at June-end 2021 against 2.84 per cent as at June-end 2020.

Gross non-performing assets (GNPA) position improved to 8.50 per cent of gross advances against 8.84 per cent. Net NPA level also improved to 3.46 per cent of net advances against 3.95 per cent.

As at June-end 2021, global deposits increased by about 12 per cent y-o-y to ₹10,21,837 crore. Global advances were up 5 per cent y-o-y to ₹6,84,585 crore, with domestic advances growing but overseas advances shrinking.

For FY22, the bank has given a guidance of 8.20 per cent growth in global deposits and 7.50 per cent growth in global advances. It has guided for a GNPA (global) of 7.90 per cent, net NPA (global) of 2.80 per cent and NIM of 2.75 per cent.

The bank expects to raise ₹9,000 crore via qualified institutions placement ( ₹2,500 crore), Additional Tier-I Bonds ( ₹4,000 crore) and Tier-II Bonds ( ₹2,500 crore).

Canara Bank’s shares closed at ₹148.80 apiece, up 1.47 per cent over the previous close on BSE.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Federal Bank Q1 profit down 8.4%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private sector lender Federal Bank reported an 8.4 per cent drop in net profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 at ₹367.29 crore. Its net profit was ₹400.77 crore in the first quarter of last fiscal.

The bank’s total income grew by 1.9 per cent to ₹4,005.86 crore in the April- June 2021 quarter from ₹3,932.52 crore a year ago.

Net interest income grew by 9.4 per cent to ₹1,418.43 crore in the first quarter this fiscal against ₹1,296.44 crore a year ago.

Other income surged by 33.1 per cent to ₹650.15 crore for the quarter under review.

Provisions increased by 62.6 per cent to ₹641.83 crore in the first quarter this fiscal as against ₹394.62 crore a year ago.

Gross non performing assets also rose to ₹4,649.33 crore or 3.5 per cent of gross advances as on June 30, 2021 versus 2.96 per cent a year ago. Net NPA levels were stable at 1.23 per cent at the end of the first quarter this fiscal versus 1.22 per cent as on June 30, 2020.

Federal Bank said 13 borrower accounts involving ₹600.67 crore were given modifications under the Resolution Framework 2.0.

In a separate stock exchange filing, Federal Bank said its board of directors at the meeting on Friday also approved allotment of 10.48 crore equity shares at the issue price of ₹87.39 per share to International Finance Corporation, IFC Financial Institutions Growth Fund and IFC Emerging Asia Fund.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Net profit doubles to Rs 5 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Private sector Dhanlaxmi Bank reported a net profit of Rs 5.28 crore in the fourth quarter of FY2020-21, up by over two-folds from a year ago. The bank had posted a net profit of Rs 2.60 crore in the year-ago same quarter.

However, the net profit during the reported quarter of FY21 was down sequentially by 55.3 per cent from Rs 11.81 crore in the December 2020-21 quarter.

Income during Q4FY21 fell to Rs 242.18 crore from Rs 280.98 crore in the same quarter of FY2019-20, Dhanlaxmi Bank said in a regulatory filing on Saturday.

For the entire fiscal year 2020-21, the bank reported a net profit of Rs 37.19 crore, which fell by 43.5 per cent from year ago’s Rs 65.78 crore.

Total income during the year was also down at Rs 1,072.23 crore from Rs 1,100.44 crore in FY20.

Bank’s asset quality showed deterioration with the gross non-performing assets (NPAs) spiking to 9.23 per cent of the gross advances by end of March 2021 as against 5.90 per cent by end of March 2020.

In value terms, the gross NPAs of the lender rose to Rs 657.21 crore from Rs 401.22 crore.

Net NPAs also soared to 4.76 per cent (Rs 322.92 crore) from 1.55 per cent (Rs 100.94 crore).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2