EoI for sale of IDBI Bank likely by September

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Absence of meaningful investor interest resulted in the government ultimately having to sell its majority stake in IDBI Bank to LIC.

The department of investment and public asset management (DIPAM) in the finance ministry on Tuesday floated a Request For Proposal (RFP), inviting transaction and legal advisers for strategic disinvestment of IDBI Bank. Once these advisers are appointed, the department would promptly invite expressions of interest (EoIs) for purchase of the stakes on offer and this would likely be by September, a senior official told FE. According to the RFQ, the applications can be filed till July 13.

Once these advisers are appointed, the department will promptly invite expressions of interest (EoIs) for purchase of the stakes on offer and this would likely be by September, the official added.

As per the plan, the government will exit the bank by divesting its entire 45.48% stake worth about Rs 19,000 crore at the current market prices and promoter Life Insurance Corporation will offer to sell a portion of its 49.24% stake with an intent to relinquish management control.

After a failed attempt a few years ago, the government diluted its stake in IDBI Bank in January 2019 in favour of LIC, which then became the promoter in the bank with 51% stake. Under a special dispensation, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority has allowed LIC to hold 51%, against the norm of 15%. The insurer will, however, have to pare its stake to 15% in due course.

Absence of meaningful investor interest resulted in the government ultimately having to sell its majority stake in IDBI Bank to LIC. That was barely privatisation. “However, this could change in 2021 if both government and LIC are able to divest a majority stake in the bank to an external investor, as it may be indicative of broader investor appetite in state-owned banks with adequate loan-loss reserves,” Fitch Ratings said in a note on June 7.

After a gap of five years, IDBI Bank was back in the black with a net profit of Rs 1,359 crore for FY21. Following improvement in asset quality, the bank exited the prompt corrective action (PCA) framework on March 10. It can resume corporate lending which was stopped after it came under PCA.

The improvement in the health of the bank is also reflected in its share price. IDBI Bank share price has risen 46% to Rs 38.60 as on Tuesday on the BSE, compared with Rs 26.35 on January 27.

Of the Rs 1.75-lakh-crore disinvestment target for FY22, the government has budgeted Rs 1 lakh crore from disinvestment of government stake in public sector financial institutions and banks such as LIC (IPO) and IDBI Bank strategic sale.

 

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDBI Bank sell-off: Govt floats RFP for appointment of transaction and legal advisor

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government on Tuesday floated a Request for Proposal (RFP) to appoint transaction advisor and legal advisor to assist in the strategic disinvestment of IDBI Bank.

The last date for interested parties to submit their bid is July 13 and the bid will be opened on July 14.

At present, IDBI Bank is classified as a private sector bank by the RBI with government shareholding at 45.48 per cent, Life Insurance Corporation of India shareholding at 49.24 per cent and the non-promoter shareholding at 5.29 per cent. LIC is the promoter while Centre is the co-promoter.

Also read: IDBI Bank has transformed into a retail bank: Samuel Joseph, Dy MD

The government proposes to go for strategic disinvestment along with transfer of management control. However, the extent of shareholding to be divested by the government and LIC will be decided at the time of structuring of transaction in consultation with the RBI.

Divestment target

The government has set a target of ₹1.75-lakh crore to be raised through disinvestment this fiscal, out of which ₹1-lakh crore is intended to be raised through off-loading the government stake in public sector banks and financial institutions. This also includes the stake sale in IDBI Bank. On May 5, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) approved the strategic disinvestment of IDBI Bank.

LIC’s Board has already passed a resolution to the effect that LIC may reduce its shareholding in IDBI Bankthrough divesting its stake along with strategic stake sale envisaged by the government with an intent to relinquish management control and by taking into consideration, price, market outlook, statutory stipulation and interest of policy holders.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lenders say they will get 26% of their dues, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The lenders to Siva Industries have told the National Company Law Tribunal that they will get 26% of their dues after taking into account third-party guarantors. Operational creditors will get part of their dues under the settlement plan, according to a report.

The deal has raised eyebrows as such offers by promoters were rejected in the past.

The NCLT, Chennai, has to explain the rationale behind the one-time settlement (OTS) offer made by Siva Industries under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The lenders have also been asked to give the timeline of cash flow to all the creditors.

Until the last payment is made to the lenders within the deadline of 180 days set in the OTS application, the liabilities of the company will not be extinguished, according to the report.

On the reason why they approved the 12A petition of promoters banks told the court that if a company is liquidated or in a resolution plan involving a third party, all operational creditors, including tax authorities, are wiped out

Also, the IDBI Bank‘s claim of Rs 644 crore will be paid while Blackstone-backed International ARC will get an additional amount of Rs 510 crore via land sale, according to the report.

The settlement

Lenders of Siva Industries and Holdings have approved a one-time settlement proposal from the promoter under which they will take a 93.% haircut and just Rs 5 crore upfront cash.

Of the company’s total dues of Rs 4,863 crore, the IDBI Bank-led lenders will get Rs 313 crore, excluding upfront payment, within 180 day of receiving NCLT nod.

They will recover Rs 318 crore, with Rs 5 crore as upfront cash, out of the company’s total dues of Rs 4,863 crore. This amounts to a haircut of 93.5 per cent.

The holding company owes financial and other creditors about Rs 5,000 crore. Tata Sons had filed a claim of Rs 863 crore against the Sivasankaran group company but that was rejected by the latter’s interim resolution professional.

The creditors received an offer from Mauritius-based Royal Partner for the company but that was rejected on the grounds that the investor had been unable to demonstrate its seriousness in completing the deal.

Unusual deal

Bankruptcy experts have termed the development unusual, citing the rejection of such offers by promoters in the past.

The acceptance of Sivasankaran’s offer differs from the usual pattern of rejection by creditors of such deals proposed by promoters seeking to withdraw their companies from bankruptcy proceedings.

Atul Punj of Punj Lloyd, Videocon’s Venugopal Dhoot, Sanjay Singal of Bhushan Power and Steel, and the Ruias of Essar Steel had all made offers to creditors to persuade them to drop bankruptcy proceedings. All were rejected.

In DHFL’s case, the promoter Kapil Wadhawan had offered to repay the debt in full, but the lenders ruled in favour of Piramal.

Experts say while banks may be getting the most out of such settlement in absence of any serious bid, but such a move weakens the IBC, especially Section 29A that bars promoters from bidding for their assets in a bankruptcy court. The Siva deal, if it goes through, could set a precedent of promoters striking settlement deals with banks when there are no bidders.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Does Siva settlement signal banks’ disillusionment with IBC?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Lenders of Siva Industries and Holdings have approved a one-time settlement proposal from the promoter under which they will take a 93.% haircut and just Rs 5 crore upfront cash.

Of the company’s total dues of Rs 4,863 crore, the IDBI Bank-led lenders will get Rs 313, excluding upfront payment, within 180 day of receiving NCLT nod.

They will recover Rs 318 crore, with Rs 5 crore as upfront cash, out of the company’s total dues of Rs 4,863 crore. This amounts to a haircut of 93.5 per cent.

The holding company owes financial and other creditors about Rs 5,000 crore. Tata Sons had filed a claim of Rs 863 crore against the Sivasankaran group company but that was rejected by the latter’s interim resolution professional.

The creditors received an offer from Mauritius-based Royal Partner for the company but that was rejected on the grounds that the investor had been unable to demonstrate its seriousness in completing the deal.

Unusual settlement

Bankruptcy experts have termed the development unusual, citing the rejection of such offers by promoters in the past.

The acceptance of Sivasankaran’s offer differs from the usual pattern of rejection by creditors of such deals proposed by promoters seeking to withdraw their companies from bankruptcy proceedings.

Atul Punj of Punj Lloyd, Videocon’s Venugopal Dhoot, Sanjay Singal of Bhushan Power and Steel, and the Ruias of Essar Steel had all made offers to creditors to persuade them to drop bankruptcy proceedings. All were rejected.

In DHFL’s case, the promoter Kapil Wadhawan had offered to repay the debt in full, but the lenders ruled in favour of Piramal.

Experts say while banks may be getting the most out of such settlement in absence of any serious bid, but such a move weakens the IBC, especially Section 29A that bars promoters from bidding for their assets in a bankruptcy court. The Siva deal, if it goes through, could set a precedent of promoters striking settlement deals with banks when there are no bidders.

Other controversies

Sivasankaran, who was the founder of Aircel before he sold it to Malaysia’s Maxis Communications, is no stranger to controversy.

The South India-based businessman has been at the centre of a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) over alleged irregularities in loans obtained from IDBI Bank. Sivasankaran was accused of obtaining loans from IDBI Bank’s overseas branches and using the proceeds to repay loans obtained from the bank in India which had turned non-performing.

He was also accused by Cyrus Mistry of receiving favours from Ratan Tata such as the grant of a loan to buy a stake in Tata Teleservices. But these allegations were rejected by the Supreme Court in its verdict on the Tata-Mistry dispute delivered on March 26.

Siva Industries was admitted for bankruptcy proceedings on July 4, 2019, as per a public announcement uploaded on the website of the IBBI.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

LIC Cards launches RuPay Prepaid Gift Card ‘Shagun’ Powered by IDBI Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A contactless prepaid Gift Card – ‘Shagun’ has been launched by LIC Cards Services Limited (LIC CSL) in collaboration with IDBI Bank on the RuPay platform with intent to promote cashless ways of gifting and present a wide range of end-use choices. It also presents itself as a future foray into the market of e-Gift Cards.

“We are delighted to partner with IDBI Bank and RuPay for the launch of LIC Gift Card powered by IDBI Bank on RuPay Platform. We believe that gifting is one of the biggest social interactions and social events in our society. We aim to enhance the value of digital transactions by providing a variety of benefits/cards thereby saving time and cost of transactions for both Gift Card buyer and recipient. LIC CSL has a vision to be the top Brand in Cards and Digital Payments, catering to all segments with geographical spread across the Country.” a spokesperson of LIC Cards Services Limited (LIC CSL) stated.

Shagun Gift card can be used at millions of merchant outlets and e-commerce websites in India to diversify spending options on the card. The card will provide users the freedom to make purchases at various merchant locations including departmental stores, petrol pumps, restaurants, jewelry stores, apparel stores, etc. They can also shop online, pay utility bills, book tickets for air, rail, bus, and so on through various mobile wallets and E-commerce portals or Apps using this card.

“In continuum with our on-going business synergies with LIC, we are glad to also have NPCI and LIC Cards Services Ltd as partners on-board for this initiative. This product has been curated keeping in mind the distinct privileges for the cardholders as well as the convenience of the contactless payment feature.” added Rakesh Sharma, MD & CEO, IDBI Bank.

“We look forward to continued collaboration with LIC CSL and IDBI Bank to take this product to the masses in coming months and further strengthen our customer base.” said Dilip Asbe, MD & CEO, NPCI.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Canara Bank to be lead sponsor of bad bank, to pick up 12% stake

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Board of Canara Bank has given in-principle approval for participating in the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) as a sponsor by taking 12 per cent equity stake.

The Bengaluru-headquartered public sector bank has sought the Reserve Bank of India’s approval for the same, the Bank said in a regulatory filing.

Banks such as State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India and IDBI Bank are expected to take up to 10 per cent stake in NARCL.

Stressed consortium loans (₹500 crore and above) will be transferred to NARCL. Banks have so far identified 22 stressed assets aggregating about ₹89,000 crore for transfer to NARCL.

Overall, stressed loans aggregating up to ₹2 lakh crore are expected to be transferred by Banks to the company.

Padmakumar Madhavan Nair (Chief General Manager with SBI’s Stressed Assets Resolution Group) has been appointed as MD & CEO of NARCL.

In her Union Budget speech on February 1, 2021, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) and an Asset Management Company (AMC) would be set up to consolidate and take over the existing stressed debt and then manage and dispose of the assets to Alternate Investment Funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation.

Indian Banks Association (IBA) is the Nodal Agency for constituting the ARC and AMC, designated as National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) and India Debt Management Company Ltd (IDMCL), respectively.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ARCs bank on retail loans in pandemic shift and bad bank competition, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As the bad bank is set to take away the big chunk of their business, asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) are thinking smaller to grow big.

ARCs have been banking on retail loans to drive business in the pandemic-hit FY21 and see the share of retail loans reaching 50% of the pie.

The ARCs are also hit by the RBI-mandated loan restructuring and moratoriums, which had led to a drop in bad loans among corporates,

The Rs 1.5-lakh-crore asset reconstruction market comprises over a dozen players. The upcoming national bad bank will add to the competition in the market and lead to distortion due to government guarantees.

The pandemic-hit FY21 saw tepid overall growth for ARCs, but retail loan portfolio grew faster adding at least 25 per cent more to the assets under management (AUM).

Retail growth

Lenders like HDFC Bank, Indusind Bank, IDBI Bank, Federal Bank and non-banks like Bajaj Finance among others have been aggressively selling their stressed retail books — auto, home and personal loans as well credit cards dues to ARCs like Edelweiss, Phoenix ARC run by Kotak Mahindra Bank, JM Financial and Reliance ARC among others since the past few years.

While Reliance ARC snaps up only retail loans, Phoenix ARC has 20 per cent of its Rs 8,500-crore total book/AUM as retail loans.

Edelweiss ARC, which has AUM of Rs 40,8000 crore, and has made a recovery of Rs 5,400 crore in FY21 from 179 accounts. The company expects about around 50 per cent of overall ARC assets coming in from retail loans in the next two years from the 10% now. On industry level, the share of retail in ARCs is around 20%.

Why retail loans?

In the past two years retail loans are rising, while corporate NPAs are coming down due to the moratorium and restructuring allowed by the Reserve Bank, which has led to a rise in interest in retail loans.

Retail loans give higher margins and better recovery rates despite the high costs.

ARCs which focus on retail portfolio may be better placed to cushion the impact of the national bad bank on their business, as the proposed national ARC will primarily be dealing with large chunky loans of Rs 500 crore and above and that too mostly from public sector banks which have the highest bad loans piles. So to secure their business, it makes better sense for ARCs to focus on retail loans as it offers better margins and faster resolution too, he adds.

However, the retail book may not grow too big for too long as once the pandemic situation normalises and large corporate books may come up for sale.

The national bad bank will leave the field uneven for private players like us due to the proposal of government guarantee.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Pvt ARCs moving to retail loans as national bad bank nearing reality, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With RBI-mandated loan restructuring and moratoriums ebbing the tide of bad loans among corporates, ARCs have been banking on retail loans to drive business in the pandemic-hit FY21 and player like Edelweiss ARC expects the industry-wide retail assets under management to hit nearly half of the overall pie.

The Rs 1.5-lakh-crore asset reconstruction market comprises over a dozen players led by Edelweiss ARC that controls over 30 per cent of the market, and the soon-to-be operationalised national bad bank, to be funded mostly by public sector banks and guaranteed by the government, will add to the clutter of the market and has private players fearing the government guarantee unlevelling their fields.

The pandemic-hit FY21 has seen tepid overall growth for asset reconstruction companies (ARCs), but retail loan portfolio grew faster adding at least 25 per cent more to the assets under management (AUM).

According to industry players, lenders like HDFC Bank, Indusind Bank, IDBI Bank, Federal Bank and non-banks like Bajaj Finance among others have been aggressively selling their stressed retail books — auto, home and personal loans as well credit cards dues to ARCs like Edelweiss, Phoenix ARC run by Kotak Mahindra Bank, JM Financial and Reliance ARC among others since the past few years.

While Reliance ARC snaps up only retail loans, for Phoenix ARC comprises 20 per cent of its Rs 8,500-crore total book/AUM.

Rashesh Shah, chairman and chief executive of Edelweiss Financial Services Group whose ARC arm sits over an AUM of Rs 40,8000 crore, and has made a recovery of Rs 5,400 crore in FY21 from 179 accounts, sees over the next two years around 50 per cent of overall ARC assets coming in from retail loans.

The retail portfolio of Edelweiss ARC is around 10 per cent now, but it will be “deleveraging the corporate portfolio and focusing on retail going forward, while at the industry level it’s about 20 per cent. But I see this touching almost half of the market over the next two years”, Shah told over the weekend.

Going forward, focus will be more on snapping up retail loans as it gives higher margins and better recovery rates, Shah added.

“For the past two years retail NPAs have been rising, while corporate NPAs coming down due to the moratorium and restructuring allowed by the Reserve Bank. This has seen interest rising among ARCs for retail assets,” Sanjay Tibrewala, the chief executive of Phoenix ARC, which is among the top five players, told on Sunday.

Tibrewala said their retail portfolio accounts for 20 per cent of the AUM of Rs 8,500 crore, and which grew marginally last year, while the overall retail assets for the industry jumped by 25 per cent.

On why the industry is snapping up more retail assets despite it being a high cost business, Tibrewala said it’s because of better margins and higher recovery levels.

Shah said that so far his group’s ARC business has been very good with strong margins, better recoveries/collections, which stood at Rs 5,400 crore in FY21 from across 179 accounts.

“Going forward, we will focus more on recoveries and when it comes to buying assets the focus will be retail portfolios. Over the past few years, retail has been growing very big, and I see it taking up half the market,” Shah said, adding they entered this space only three years ago.

He further said since then Edelweiss added 200-strong team to man the retail portfolio as its more people intensive.

On the asset purchase side Shah noted that on average their acquisition cost varies from 60 to 70 paise and sometimes they also go for profit sharing with lender/seller.

Shah is driving retail as it’s more predictable when it comes to recoveries.

An industry expert also opined that ARCs which focus on retail portfolio may be better placed to cushion the impact of the national bad bank on their business, as the proposed national ARC will primarily be dealing with large chunky loans of Rs 500 crore and above and that too mostly from public sector banks which have the highest bad loans piles.

So to secure their business, it makes better sense for ARCs to focus on retail loans as it offers better margins and faster resolution too, he adds.

However, Tibrewala does not see the retail book growing too big for too long as once the pandemic situation normalises, he sees large corporate books coming up for sale.

“We have been in retail segment for many years but do not see faster growth for retail once pandemic related restrictions and benefits normalise, and corporate accounts come back to the markets again,” Tibrewala said.

The national bad bank, he said, will leave the field “uneven for private players like us due to the proposal of government guarantee. However, it can be one area for sourcing assets for us. We are actively looking at assets”.

Edelweiss ARC closed FY21 with a revenue of Rs 340 crore of which Rs 79 crore came in Q4 and earned a Rs 186 crore net profit for the year and Rs 45 crore for Q4. It has comfortable liquidity position of Rs 540 crore as of end March.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Pvt ARCs moving to retail loans as national bad bank nearing reality, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With RBI-mandated loan restructuring and moratoriums ebbing the tide of bad loans among corporates, ARCs have been banking on retail loans to drive business in the pandemic-hit FY21 and player like Edelweiss ARC expects the industry-wide retail assets under management to hit nearly half of the overall pie.

The Rs 1.5-lakh-crore asset reconstruction market comprises over a dozen players led by Edelweiss ARC that controls over 30 per cent of the market, and the soon-to-be operationalised national bad bank, to be funded mostly by public sector banks and guaranteed by the government, will add to the clutter of the market and has private players fearing the government guarantee unlevelling their fields.

The pandemic-hit FY21 has seen tepid overall growth for asset reconstruction companies (ARCs), but retail loan portfolio grew faster adding at least 25 per cent more to the assets under management (AUM).

According to industry players, lenders like HDFC Bank, Indusind Bank, IDBI Bank, Federal Bank and non-banks like Bajaj Finance among others have been aggressively selling their stressed retail books — auto, home and personal loans as well credit cards dues to ARCs like Edelweiss, Phoenix ARC run by Kotak Mahindra Bank, JM Financial and Reliance ARC among others since the past few years.

While Reliance ARC snaps up only retail loans, for Phoenix ARC comprises 20 per cent of its Rs 8,500-crore total book/AUM.

Rashesh Shah, chairman and chief executive of Edelweiss Financial Services Group whose ARC arm sits over an AUM of Rs 40,8000 crore, and has made a recovery of Rs 5,400 crore in FY21 from 179 accounts, sees over the next two years around 50 per cent of overall ARC assets coming in from retail loans.

The retail portfolio of Edelweiss ARC is around 10 per cent now, but it will be “deleveraging the corporate portfolio and focusing on retail going forward, while at the industry level it’s about 20 per cent. But I see this touching almost half of the market over the next two years”, Shah told over the weekend.

Going forward, focus will be more on snapping up retail loans as it gives higher margins and better recovery rates, Shah added.

“For the past two years retail NPAs have been rising, while corporate NPAs coming down due to the moratorium and restructuring allowed by the Reserve Bank. This has seen interest rising among ARCs for retail assets,” Sanjay Tibrewala, the chief executive of Phoenix ARC, which is among the top five players, told on Sunday.

Tibrewala said their retail portfolio accounts for 20 per cent of the AUM of Rs 8,500 crore, and which grew marginally last year, while the overall retail assets for the industry jumped by 25 per cent.

On why the industry is snapping up more retail assets despite it being a high cost business, Tibrewala said it’s because of better margins and higher recovery levels.

Shah said that so far his group’s ARC business has been very good with strong margins, better recoveries/collections, which stood at Rs 5,400 crore in FY21 from across 179 accounts.

“Going forward, we will focus more on recoveries and when it comes to buying assets the focus will be retail portfolios. Over the past few years, retail has been growing very big, and I see it taking up half the market,” Shah said, adding they entered this space only three years ago.

He further said since then Edelweiss added 200-strong team to man the retail portfolio as its more people intensive.

On the asset purchase side Shah noted that on average their acquisition cost varies from 60 to 70 paise and sometimes they also go for profit sharing with lender/seller.

Shah is driving retail as it’s more predictable when it comes to recoveries.

An industry expert also opined that ARCs which focus on retail portfolio may be better placed to cushion the impact of the national bad bank on their business, as the proposed national ARC will primarily be dealing with large chunky loans of Rs 500 crore and above and that too mostly from public sector banks which have the highest bad loans piles.

So to secure their business, it makes better sense for ARCs to focus on retail loans as it offers better margins and faster resolution too, he adds.

However, Tibrewala does not see the retail book growing too big for too long as once the pandemic situation normalises, he sees large corporate books coming up for sale.

“We have been in retail segment for many years but do not see faster growth for retail once pandemic related restrictions and benefits normalise, and corporate accounts come back to the markets again,” Tibrewala said.

The national bad bank, he said, will leave the field “uneven for private players like us due to the proposal of government guarantee. However, it can be one area for sourcing assets for us. We are actively looking at assets”.

Edelweiss ARC closed FY21 with a revenue of Rs 340 crore of which Rs 79 crore came in Q4 and earned a Rs 186 crore net profit for the year and Rs 45 crore for Q4. It has comfortable liquidity position of Rs 540 crore as of end March.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Centre may front load capital provisioning for PSBs this year, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, As the Central government draws a plan to privatise at least two public sector banks (PSB) this fiscal, it has also decided to front load capitalisation of state-owned banks so that the balance sheets of some of these entities are strengthened ahead of possible sale.

Sources said that PSBs may be provided this year just after their first quarter results before October. This would be a departure from the practice of previous year when bank capitalisation was undertaken late in the year and towards the end of fiscal.

Even in FY21, a substantial portion of capital was released right at end of the fiscal year in March.

“Front loading of capital will help PSBs to strengthen their financials that may again get impacted this year with weak lending and stress coming back on a lot of their credit assets with Covid pandemic continuing to disrupt businesses. This could also help in taking out weak banks out of the PCA (prompt corrective action) framework that would be helpful in their possible privatisation this year,” said an official source on the condition of anonymity.

The Budget 2021-22 has allocated Rs 20,000 crore towards recapitalisation of PSBs to help them consolidate their financial capacity.

Source said that more than two-third of this capital may be provided by the second quarter.

The government had earlier indicated that banks under prompt corrective action (PCA) framework or weaker banks would be kept out of privatisation as it would be difficult to find buyers for them. This would have left three PSBs, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank and UCO Bank, out of the government’s disinvestment plan.

But now the thinking is that they could be brought out of PCA as there are visible signs of improvement in some of the key parameters such as profitability and asset quality (in net NPA terms as they have stepped up provisioning) in the last 3-4 quarters. This could allow them to be considered for privatisation.

Provision of capital earlier in the year will give the necessary boost to them.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced in her Budget speech this year that two state-run banks along with IDBI Bank would be privatised in FY22.

She also said that one general insurance company would be sold off in the current fiscal.

The recapitalisation roadmap is being redrawn for the PSBs in the current fiscal as the institutions are expected to face stress from the pandemic disruptions with fears that asset quality may further weaken like last year.

Also, the changes in valuation norms AT1 bonds has made the instrument less attractive for banks to raise their capital.

SEBI, though has amended the valuation rule of perpetual bonds in line with objections raised by the finance ministry, it still has said that from April 2023 onwards, the residual maturity of AT-1 bonds will become 100 years from the date of issuance of the bond. This will make the most used route of raising capital by banks less attractive.

Sources said that the Finance Ministry has already started a preliminary exercise to determine the capital requirement of banks in wake of limitations on fund raising norms and expected rise in bad assets during the time of the pandemic. Based on the inputs received by banks, additional capital may be provided to them from budgetary resources at the earliest.

On its part, government is strengthening the banking segment by merger and amalgamation of PSBs.

Since 2017, this exercise has resulted in seven large and five smaller PSBs.

The measures (based on bad loans and regional factors) were intended to help manage capital more efficiently. But emerging regulatory needs and pandemic affected businesses continue to pose challenges for banking segment.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5 6 8