Tax department sends reassessment notices to global fund houses, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Income Tax Department has reopened old assessments of at least a dozen global fund houses and private equity funds alleging under-reporting of income through the misuse of tax treaties.

The department, in a communication last week, asked these fund houses to furnish details about the structure of their business, past investors and bank signatories, an official told ET.

The department has asked them to explain irregularities in computation of income for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16, the official said.

Its early estimates peg income that allegedly escaped assessment at more than ₹300 crore, the person said.

The notices were sent after earlier explanations by the funds were found unsatisfactory by the department, which wants to look deeper into income statements and returns. The reassessment notices were issued under Section 148 of the I-T Act, which deals with income that has escaped assessment.

Under the rules, the tax department can go back up to 10 years to scrutinise past assessments if the concealment of income is ₹50 lakh and above.

Most Investments via Mauritius, Cyprus
“Most of these global private equity funds invested in India through Mauritius and Cyprus during these assessment years,” said the official. The department wants to know why these funds hadn’t invested directly but through a particular jurisdiction, he said.

The department reserves the right to reject a tax residency certificate (TRC) if it detects abuse of tax treaty benefits and treaty shopping. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) didn’t respond to queries.

Most global funds channelled their investments in India via jurisdictions such as Mauritius and Singapore that allowed them to enjoy capital gains tax exemption. However, India amended the tax treaty with Mauritius effective April 1, 2017, withdrawing the exemption.

Capital Gains Tax
These funds are currently subject to capital gains tax. Private equity funds, which deal in unlisted companies, attract long-term capital gains at 10%, while short-term capital gain tax is levied at 30-40%.

Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) that invest in listed companies attract long-term capital gains at 10% for equities sold on the exchanges, even if securities transaction tax has been paid.

Tax experts said the latest move could create uncertainty for investors. “Any fresh tax demands on such old investments could create challenges for fund managers because they may not be able to recover taxes and penalties from investors who might have already exited the fund,” said Rajesh H Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP.

Foreign investors have been hoping that, as a result of certain favourable court cases and specific protection under the General Anti-Avoidance Rule for investments made before 2017, past investments would not be challenged, he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Tax Query: How to close HUF account with the I-T Department

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


My friend is having an HUF account. Till 2016 he had business income in HUF. He has two sons and a spouse. Both sons are not interested in continuing the business, hence he wants to close his HUF account with the bank as well as the income tax department. Request your advice on how to close HUF account with the income tax department.

Pravin Shah

Hindu Undivided Family (‘HUF’) is dissolved only on the partition of property between the members. It is important to note that as per the provisions of section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), partial partition of HUF is not recognised. Under the provisions of Act, partition means ‘full partition’.

For the purpose of dissolution of the HUF, your friend will need to draw up a deed of full partition and get the same registered. Once the partition of HUF is complete, it will cease to exist.

Till the date of such dissolution, the HUF shall be assessed in its capacity as a HUF and the return of income for such period should be filed by your friend. Also, your friend may make an application for surrender of PAN of HUF with the jurisdictional assessing officer by submitting a request in this regard after the partition of the HUF and related compliances (like filing of return) are complete.

In one of answers to a query earlier, you had stated that in view of the amendment to Sec. 55 of the Income tax Act, where the property is purchased before April 1, 2001, the fair market valuation as per the valuation by a registered valuer as at April 1, 2001 would be considered the cost of acquisition, which has been capped from April 1, 2021 at the stamp duty value, wherever available. A search on the site of the Inspector General of Valuation of Registration, Tamil Nadu reveals that fair valuation as revised from 9.6.2017 is available only from April 1, 2002. The site states that the information provided online is updated and no physical visit is required for services provided online. Do we then assume that since the stamp duty value is not available as on April 1, 2021, the fair market valuation by the valuer could be considered as the cost of acquisition for property sale in Chennai ?

Murli Krishnamurthy

As per the provisions of section 55(2)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), in case of a property purchased before April 1, 2001, the cost of acquisition shall be considered as any of the following at the option of the assessee:

– the fair market value (‘FMV’) of the property as on April 1, 2001; or

– the actual cost of acquisition of the property.

As per amendment made vide Finance Act, 2020, in case of a capital asset being land or building or both, the FMV of such asset (as on April 1, 2001) for the purpose of section 55, shall not exceed the stamp duty value (‘SDV’), wherever available, as on April 1, 2001.

In the instant case, I understand that SDV as on April 1, 2001 is not available for the subject property. In such scenario, you may consider FMV as on April 1, 2001 as the cost of acquisition of the property for the purpose of section 55 of the Act.

The writer is a practising chartered accountant

Send your queries to taxtalk@thehindu.co.in

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY