Financial planning: Striking a work-life balance

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Sundar, aged 39, under stress due to his employment, was desperate to quit. His wife, Nandini, aged 37, was not earning.

. Sundar wanted to set aside an emergency fund for medical needs. He also wanted to gradually liquidate a few investments to support his expenses till he got employed in a relatively less-stress job. He also was inclined to venture on his own as an alternative.

Sundar wanted to protect his commitment towards the education of his son, aged 11. . His net worth and annual cash flows are mentioned in the accompanying tables.

Goals

After a detailed discussion, the goals were redefined as follows. An emergency fund of ₹16 lakh was to be maintained. The housing loan was to be foreclosed in the next 5- 7 years. Sundar also wanted to accumulate ₹ 30 lakh at current cost for his son’s education that would fall due in 2026; at 10 per cent inflation, the cost worked out to about ₹ 53 lakh.

Sundar wanted to retire at his age of 50. The life expectancy for him and his spouse was up to age 90. The retirement expenses were found to be ₹40,000 a month. Considering 6 per cent inflation over the years, it amounted to about ₹76,000 a month at age 50; this warranted a corpus of ₹ 2.91 crore at retirement.

As Sundar wanted to settle in his home town, we suggested that he dispose both the houses in Bengaluru. With the proceeds, he could buy a farmland and a house in his home town for a comfortable retired life.

In addition to the retirement corpus, Sundar wanted to build a wealth corpus of ₹2 crore to provide for his travel, health and other needs post retirement.

We assessed Sundar’s risk profile as ‘growth- oriented’. His current asset allocation was almost equally split between equity and debt including his RSU (restricted stock units) holdings.

He was saving regularly in a ratio of 60:40 in equity and debt. We recommended the same allocation ratio for his future savings and investments.

Recommendations

We advised Sundar to tag ₹16 lakh of his fixed deposits as his emergency fund. Another ₹ 2 lakh can be tagged as a fund towards career growth. We recommended that Sundar invest ₹8 lakh and tag his current mutual fund holdings of ₹7 lakh to his son’s education. This would fetch him a corpus of about ₹ 26.5 lakh in six years. He was advised to invest ₹ 30,000 per month to manage the deficit — staying with large cap funds for the equity allocation and short -term funds for the debt allocation. Sundar could expect to generate a corpus of ₹ 2.2 crore from his current holdings of EPF (Employees’ Provident Fund), PPF (Public Provident Fund) and RSU and his regular contribution to PF and PPF. To fund the deficit in the retirement corpus, we advised him to invest ₹ 31,000 per month in 70:30 allocation in equity (using a combination of large- and mid-cap funds) and debt (through National Pension System).

Sundar had been investing ₹50,000 per month in his RSU through his voluntary savings and RSU allotments every year. As he did not plan to continue with the current employer, we recommended not to tag such savings. We advised him to increase his loan repayment by ₹ 25,000 per month. This will help him close his housing loan in 5.5 years, and save interest cost of about ₹ 10 lakh as well.

Sundar would have to invest about ₹10 lakh per annum to get another ₹ 2 crore as wealth corpus at his retirement. He was not in a position to commit this amount now. But with his earning potential, he would be able to invest later. The loan repayment and his son’s school fees will stop after six years. This should also help him accumulate the desired corpus.

We also advised Sundar to opt for ₹1.5 crore pure term life insurance for himself and ₹10 lakh health insurance for his family immediately.

Sundar’s disciplined savings and investments over the years made it possible to achieve his desired work-life balance.

The writer is an investment advisor registered with SEBI and Co-founder of Chamomile Investment Consultants, Chennai

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Can switching home loan ease your EMI burden?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Is your big-ticket home loan pinching you in this time of crisis? While continuing to pay your EMIs is advisable (rather than opting for the moratorium), it may be time to review your existing home loan to see if you can lower your monthly payout.

In its monetary policy last week, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) held its key policy repo rate at 4 per cent.

But that doesn’t matter.

A look at data across banks suggests that even now there is a wide difference between the lending rates on home loans linked to MCLR (marginal cost of funds-based lending rate) and that on those benchmarked against RBI’s repo rate.

In many cases, the difference is 30-50 bps within the same bank, which amounts to a sizeable difference in interest over the tenure of the home loan.

Basics

Home loans are broadly of two types — fixed and floating. Generally, fixed-rate home loans charge a substantially higher interest rate. Hence, it may be advisable to opt for floating-rate loans, particularly in a falling-rate scenario.

Now, under floating-rate loans, lending rates change depending on the interest-rate movements in the broader economy. Earlier (from April 2016), home loans were linked to a bank-specific benchmark — MCLR.

Here, while a repo-rate cut by the RBI leads to banks lowering their MCLR, it happens with a lag and varies widely across banks.

Also, generally, home loans are benchmarked against one-year MCLR and, hence, lending rates are reset only once every year. So, even when banks cut MCLR, the benefit of it is transmitted to borrowers only when the loans are reset.

To address these issues, the RBI had mandated banks to introduce repo-linked loans from October last year. Here, if the RBI cuts the repo rate, it gets reflected on your lending rates much faster (banks have to reset their repo-based benchmark rates at least once in three months).

This is a key reason why lending rates on repo-linked home loans are much cheaper than those on MCLR-linked loans within your own bank.

Effective rates matter

While comparing rates, the final effective lending rate is what matters and not the repo-linked benchmark. This is because banks charge a spread over the repo-linked benchmark rate to arrive at the final loan rate. For instance, at SBI, the repo-linked benchmark rate (EBR) is currently at 6.65 per cent.

For a ₹30-75-lakh loan, a spread of 60 bps (for salaried borrower) is charged on it, taking the effective lending rate to 7.25 per cent. At ICICI Bank, the repo-linked rate is currently 4 per cent, over which the bank charges a 3.2 per cent spread, taking the effective lending rate to 7.2 per cent.

Hence, while comparing rates to switch, you need to look at the final loan rate, including the spread, under both repo- and MCLR-linked loans.

Next, some banks also offer special rates for good borrowers with sound credit scores. For instance, at PNB, while the spread charged over the benchmark is 50 bps in case of a borrower with credit score of 750 and above, it is higher at 75-85 bps for those with a lower score. In the case of Bank of India, you can get loan at an attractive 6.85 per cent if you have a high credit score.

Once you have noted the underlying benchmark, the spread and the concession (if any), that determine the final lending rate, the next step is to do the maths.

Tidy savings?

Your decision to switch will broadly depend on three factors — difference in lending rates, remaining tenure of loan and outstanding loan amount.

Your savings by way of interest on the entire tenure (residual) of the loan will be the highest when all three are on the upper side — a wide difference between existing and new lending rates (under repo-linked), long residual tenure of loan and huge outstanding loan amount.

The accompanying table shows that if you have a home loan outstanding of ₹55 lakh and the remaining tenure is 23 years, sizeable savings kick in when the difference in lending rates is 50 bps (or over).

In such a case, you can straightaway make the move. But if the difference in lending rates is only 10 bps, the savings shrink substantially to about ₹1 lakh over the tenure of the loan.

While this is still notable, you may still want to weigh other charges before making the switch. For instance, if you are making the switch within the same bank, you may have to pay a one-time administrative fee.

For example, Bank of India charges an additional 0.10 per cent over normal lending rate if you intend to switch over from MCLR- to repo-linked loans, according to the bank’s website.

In case you are switching between banks, there may be a processing fee involved, which could be a percentage of loan amount (can go up to 2 per cent, subject to a minimum amount). Also, amid the ongoing restrictions owing to the Covid-19 pandemic, switching between banks may be procedurally tedious.

In any case, if you have a small loan outstanding and a short tenure remaining, it may not make sense for you to switch, even if the lending rates are widely different (see table). For instance, in the case of a ₹5-lakh outstanding amount with a residual tenure of four years, the savings will be quite low.

The other factor to take into account is that given that rates have fallen sharply over the past two years, a rate hike in the next two years could pinch you more under the repo-linked loans.

This is because lending rates can move up sharply and quickly. That is all the more reason for you to avoid making the switch if you have a short tenure of loan left.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4