China crackdown cuts Big Tech down to size, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Shanghai, March 21, 2021 -Tighter regulations, billions in lost overseas share value and government pledges to get even tougher — Chinese tech giants are reeling under what looks like a sustained Big Brother assault on innovation and enterprise.

But there’s a reason why the escalating crackdown is largely drawing shrugs from Chinese consumers: it is widely seen as necessary.

Concern is rising in China over chaotic online lending and accusations of powerful platforms squeezing merchants and misusing consumer data, reflecting global unease with Big Tech that has Facebook, Google and others also facing scrutiny at home and abroad.

“With China, it immediately becomes about the Communist Party. But if the UK government were doing this, people would probably be OK with it,” said Jeffrey Towson, head of research at Asia Tech Strategy.

“These actions look quite reasonable.”

Companies such as e-commerce giants Alibaba and JD.com, along with messaging-and-gaming colossus Tencent, are among the world’s most valuable businesses, feasting on growing Chinese digital lifestyles and a government ban on major US competitors.

But they have become victims of their own success.

The troubles burst into public view last October when Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma committed the cardinal sin of publicly criticising China’s regulators for their increasingly dire warnings concerning his company’s financial arm, Ant Group.

Ant Group’s Alipay platform is ubiquitous in China, used to buy everything from meals to ride-hailing, groceries and travel tickets.

Slow-footed regulatory oversight also allowed Ant to expand into loans, wealth management, even insurance. Tencent’s fintech profile also has risen.

Consequently, they have become “overly powerful actors capable of pushing regulatory boundaries without regard for systemic risks,” Eurasia Group consultancy said in a research note.

These ambitions have collided with Beijing’s years-long campaign to purge its chaotic financial system of a dangerous debt build-up.

– Size matters – Chinese debt spiralled to 335 percent of gross domestic product by the end of 2020, according to the Institute of International Finance. Previous lower levels had already prompted International Monetary Fund concern.

The official response to Ma’s unusual outburst has been uncompromising: Ant’s record-breaking $35 billion Hong Kong-Shanghai IPO was abruptly suspended, Ma disappeared from public view for weeks, and regulatory screws have been tightened.

China is expected to force Ant and Tencent to begin running their lending operations like banks, with resulting higher scrutiny and financial liability — things the fintech leaders had largely avoided.

“They’ll have to meet capital requirements and set up financial holding companies. They can’t escape it,” said Ke Yan, lead analyst at DZT Research.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Alibaba was also being pushed to shed wide-ranging media assets, including a potential sale of Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post.

The tumult has sliced billions off Chinese tech firms’ share values.

In China’s crackdown, size matters.

While just over 20 percent of US retail spending takes place online, China is forecast to surpass 50 percent this year. Major Chinese platforms boast hundreds of millions of users, amplifying concerns about industry concentration and data privacy.

Ma’s unusual outburst was seen by many as a direct Big Tech challenge to Communist Party authority and influence.

But Ke says: “I don’t think (the crackdown) was triggered by Jack Ma. It’s been planned for a long time.”

Unease over tech’s growing influence is not unique to China.

“Most major governments globally are focussed on this issue in a way they weren’t two years ago. Everyone seems to think that Big Tech has gotten too powerful,” Towson said.

– ‘Very China approach’ – Such crackdowns are not unusual in China.

Its economy has transformed so rapidly in recent decades that regulators often play catch-up, eventually making headlines with clampdowns that analysts say are often necessary — though belated — attempts to address problems that appear.

“It’s a very ‘China’ approach: ‘Let it run to not stifle innovation, and we’ll step in a bit later,'” said Towson, adding that China is “rightfully concerned” over how fast fintech has grown.

Many Chinese web-users say the crackdown should have come sooner. Consumers increasingly express privacy concerns as use of facial recognition and other advanced technologies expand in China.

More measures could be coming. President Xi Jinping last week called for tightened oversight to prevent online monopolies and financial chaos.

This could “break down the walled gardens built by Alibaba and Tencent,” Eurasia Group said, leading to a “more level playing field for smaller companies and present better choices for consumers.”

Ant’s eventual IPO is expected to be severely trimmed down, but China’s moves are “unlikely (to) materially change the competitive landscape and potential growth” in such a crucial sector, investment group CLSA said in a research report.

“Regulatory risks are overstated,” it added.

It may take time for the “dust to settle”, said Ke, but he adds: “there is still huge growth behind these companies.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reliance partners Google, Facebook in seeking NUE licence from RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: Reliance has partnered Google and Facebook to set up a New Umbrella Entity (NUE) that will allow them to create a payment network similar to the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) to gain a share of India’s burgeoning digital payments market. The NUE will be jointly promoted by an RIL unit and Infibeam Avenue subsidiary So Hum Bharat. Facebook and Google will hold smaller stakes. The companies are in advanced stages of submitting their proposal to the RBI, three people with knowledge of the matter told ET.

Deadline extended to March 31

Former Itzcash founder and payment industry veteran Navin Surya has been appointed MD and chief executive, said the people cited above. Reliance, Google and Facebook didn’t respond to queries. “We are bound by the confidentiality of the process and cannot comment,” an Infibeam Avenues spokesperson said. “A proposal will be presented to the Reserve Bank of India on detailing the consortium’s plan to strengthen India’s digital economy,” said one of the people with knowledge of the matter. “Representatives of these companies have been in talks with the central bank over the past few months to ensure compliance ahead of the formal presentation of the bid.”

The RBI is expected to take another six months to study the proposal along with other bids. RBI said Friday that the deadline to submit applications had been extended to March 31, following a plea by the Indian Banks’ Association. ET had reported on February 19 that the regulator may consider extending the deadline, keeping in mind Covid-related disruptions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Why PayPal’s decision to call it quits in India doesn’t come as a surprise

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


PayPal’s decision to shut down domestic payment operations in India at a time when digital transactions are hitting new records every month may come as a surprise but has been brewing for some time.

While PayPal did not give the reasons for existing the booming Indian market, experts who have been tracking the company in India say that the existing business model based on UPI, and regulations around it was not in sync with the American company’s ambitions.

Troubles with RBI

The company, which has been offering cross-border payments in India for over a decade, had launched its domestic operations in India in 2017. But its troubles with RBI had begun in 2011 when the company was forced to suspend personal payments to and from India and transfers to local banks in India. This came after the RBI asked the company to comply with Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. PayPal remained in the cross-border transaction business for several years after that until 2016 when the company appointed Anupam Pahuja as the country head for India. Pahuja’s mandate was to expand PayPal’s operations in India. In 2017, the company took a bunch of Indian journalists to its headquarters in San Jose, California, where the company showcased its services in the US market, indicating that some of the services could make their way to India.

In an interview with BusinessLine, PayPal’s President and CEO Dan Schulman said that after giving merchants the opportunity to grow their businesses by connecting with customers outside of India, PayPal wants to give Indian merchants an opportunity to grow domestically, as well. There were also reports about the company acquiring a stake in Indian payment company but that it never fructified. In 2019, Pahuja identified travel sector as one of the key areas for the company in India. “It is high up on the priority list. We are dominant in most of our core, developed markets, thus, we started looking at other markets. We saw a layer of growth that India provides. Our expectation is to be one of the top three players in India in the travel segment in the coming year or so,” Pahuja had said then. Then the Covid pandemic happened and the travel industry came to a standstill.

Legal battle

Meanwhile, Delhi High Court issued a notice over a petition filed by Abhijit Mishra alleging that the global payments major had violated Section 4(1) of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. Amid this legal battle, other global players including Google launched payment services in India and cornered a large share.

In the middle of 2020, Paypal realised that it will have to link up with UPI if it wants to offer a meaningful service in India. “If it had a choice PayPal would have wanted to roll out payment services on its own. It wasn’t comfortable with the UPI model. This is one of the reasons why it delayed the launch even as other players got into the market quickly,” said an executive who worked with PayPal earlier.

Final nail

Just when it was planning to roll out its UPI platform, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) came up with a new set of rules in November 2020 that imposes a cap on the share of Unified Payment Interface transactions that a single payment application can process. NPCI said that third-party applications providing payments services via UPI can process a maximum of 30 per cent of the transaction volumes starting Jan. 1, 2021. This seems to have been the final nail in PayPal’s plans for India.

“From 1 April 2021, we will focus all our attention on enabling more international sales for Indian businesses, and shift focus away from our domestic products in India,” PayPal said in a statement without giving a reason for its decision.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banking sector to be tech-driven: Khandelwal

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


According to him, more and more technology and applications will be run in cloud and Deutsche Bank has already moved in that direction and is partnering with Google for their cloud solution.

“That is one of the boldest steps we have taken in Deustche Bank. Cloud is our future and we will move a lot of these applications or recreate and refactor them into the cloud world. We did our letter of intent with Google. We are building a partnership with an ultimate view that a lot of applications will be hosted on public cloud,” Khandelwal told BusinessLine in a recent interaction.

Big cloud providers are investing heavily in security and safeguarding the data. They are experts on infrastructure and are doing a lot of work to ensure that data is protected in the best possible manner, he further said.

Tech hub

Underlining the use of technology in banking, Khandelwal also said India is emerging a tech hub for the sector.

“Banking will be one of the sectors where technology will play a massive role in terms of service being offered to customers. Technology in the banking sector needs to be in the front,”he said, adding that India will be the technology hub for evolving banking of the future.

“India is very attractive, especially for the financial sector. There is availability of banking knowledge as well as quality talent. India also has a great start-up culture and a lot of start-ups are trying to solve issues on communications, payments, KYC which all impact banking technology directly,” he further said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

In a first, global m-cap hits $100 trillion, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: For the first time ever, the total value of all the listed stocks in the world crossed $100 trillion last week on the back of major contributions from the US and Chinese markets. On December 5, the world’s market capitalisation was at $100.5 trillion, or about Rs 7,400 lakh crore, Bloomberg data showed.

A large part of this rally is due to the upswing in tech stocks in the US, popularly known as FAANGM (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google and Microsoft), market players said. At close of trading last week, the US had an m-cap of $41.6 trillion, while China’s was $10.7 trillion. India, with a market cap of $2.4 trillion, or about Rs 180 lakh crore, was placed 10th.

On March 24, the global market cap had fallen to $61.6 trillion — a level that was not seen since 2016, Bloomberg data showed. However, a steep V-shaped recovery of almost 63% from the March low has helped global m-cap reach the milestone. Year-to-date, the value is up 15.5%, from $87 trillion at the close of 2019.

The US and China have increased their market share in 2020, while all the other eight in the top 10 m-cap league have lost their shares.

From 39.5% at the start of the year, the US now has a share of over 41.6% to lead the global market cap table, while China with 10.7% from 8.4% at the start, is the second-most valued.

On the other hand, Japan — the country with the third-highest market cap — grew from $6.3 trillion to nearly $6.8 trillion, but its share in global m-cap slid from 7.2% to just over 6.7%. Likewise, India’s share currently is 2.4%, down marginally from 2.5% at the start of the year.

Canada is the only country that increased its position in the global league table to seven from eight, replacing Saudi Arabia, thanks mainly to Saudi Aramco’s m-cap which is almost at the same level it was at the start of the year, while a rally in tech stocks lifted Canada’s market cap.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3