More than 10 malware-infused apps stealing banking info revealed; 300,000 downloads in 4 months, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A total of 12 ‘Android banking trojans’ infused apps were discovered at Google Play store, according to a recent report by ThreatFabric, an international security expert and research firm. These apps were downloaded more than 300,000 times in the last four months and were used to steal people’s bank account details.

Google has been improving Play Store’s security but there are still some malware infused apps that manage to sneak inside. These apps were posing as QR code scanners, PDF scanners, and even cryptocurrency wallets,” researchers said.

The apps belonged to four different Android malware versions, and were designed to steal people’s online banking passwords and two-factor authentication codes. “The malware even captured keystrokes and could take screenshots of users’ phones” it added.

Highlighting how these apps bypassed Google’s security checks, it said that the apps were distributed as a legitimate app with no malware and worked as they were advertised which made users think there’s nothing wrong with them.

They also had positive reviews in the Play Store, which further contributed to the so-called legitimacy of these apps. Users were later asked to install software updates from third-party sources for additional features.

“Through these updates, a very advanced Android banking trojan ‘Anatsa’ would be installed in the victims’ phones. This Android trojan is capable of giving hackers remote access to a victim’s phone and wiping out one’s bank account by transferring all the money to their account” it added. In addition to Anatsa, these apps also had other Android malware including Alien, Hydra and Ermac.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Mukesh Ambani’s $50 phone can unleash a credit revolution across the globe, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A smartphone widely believed to be priced below $50, likely the world’s cheapest, will start selling a week from now. If Mukesh Ambani’s JioPhone Next, an Android device custom-built for India by Alphabet Inc.’s Google, is a hit in the price-conscious market, it will solve one problem for banks while posing another.

With the country’s remaining 300 million feature-phone users going online, there will be a surge of customer data that can stand in for collateral. The question is, how will banks get their hands on it?

An answer has come from iSPIRT, a small band of policy influencers quietly setting up technology standards for India’s digital markets, inducing firms to enter new, open-network markets from online payments to healthcare.

The Bangalore-based group is championing a fresh set of players — account aggregators — to unlock a much sought-after prize: Bringing into the folds of formal credit the 80% of adults in developing countries (40% in rich nations) who don’t borrow money from traditional institutions.

But these people and their micro enterprises are increasingly online thanks to innovations like JioPhone Next. They’re paying rents, rates and utility bills and receiving payments on their smartphones, scattering their footprints all over the internet. Account aggregators will gather those digital crumbs for people to share their own data in a machine-readable format for a bank loan application.

Introducing a layer of consent managers is important. Emerging-market borrowers can have many types of accounts-based relationships. Yet they can be useless to banks if they can’t present a composite picture of their financial lives to access formal loans that get monitored by credit bureaus. More than three-fifths of India’s adult population is either invisible to credit scorers or not considered worth the trouble by standard lending institutions.

In an advanced economy like the U.S., services such as Experian Boost and LenddoScore help narrow the subprime borrowers’ visibility gap by getting them to voluntarily submit their utility or video-streaming bills to demonstrate creditworthiness. But in an emerging market with low financial literacy, banks would rather leave the bottom of the pyramid to lenders who know the borrower in real life or have some social leverage on her — such as micro-finance firms that lend to groups of women.

Conversely, tech platforms, intimately aware of their customers’ online behavior, can match them with loans, collecting fees while leaving risks with the banks. Jack Ma’s Ant Group Co. cornered nearly a fifth of China’s short-term consumer debt before Beijing broke up the game.

Not every country can afford to bring out the heavy artillery against its private sector: Politics wouldn’t allow it. Aggregators can be a much softer tool for keeping the lending market fair, giving banks a reasonable economic chance to compete with data-rich tech giants.

Take JioPhone Next. It will spew out data about a large segment of sparsely banked population. Jio, Ambani’s 4G telecom network, will capture some of it as subscribers of its cheap data plans buy groceries from JioMart, an online partnership with neighborhood stores across India. Google will also get valuable data about users’ location and search queries. Facebook Inc. will exploit its own knowledge, as the social media giant adds to its half-a-billion-strong Indian customer base for WhatsApp and a growing craze for Instagram Reels, a video-sharing platform. Unsurprisingly then, Google wants to influence India’s deposit market, and Facebook is nibbling into the small business loans pie.

When it comes to real-time data, banks can never match the platforms’ clout. But account aggregators’ snapshots can help them catch a break.

Just enough additional data that will tell them if a customer is more creditworthy than suggested by a low (or no) credit score can make a big difference to profit, especially as banks won’t have to pay hefty fees to the likes of Jio, Google or Facebook for their proprietary assessments. By owning and explicitly sharing their data, customers will avoid getting trapped in the tech industry’s biased algorithms. Tiny enterprises will be able to show their cash flows to lenders by pooling everything from tax payments to customer receipts. Once telecom firms come on board, an affordable “buy-now-pay-later” plan on a refrigerator purchase will become possible for a low-income family that pays its phone bills regularly .

Aggregation, being a utility, will be like tap water to platforms’ Evian, and be priced accordingly. Who will own the pipes? Walmart Inc.’s PhonePe, which runs India’s most popular digital wallet, has received an in-principle approval to be an aggregator from the central bank. Eight banks, which between them account for 48% of all accounts in the country, have agreed to use the framework, which went live Thursday.

It’s a good start. Banks desperately need some help to stay in the money game. Or they’ll just go crying to regulators and ask them for special protections against Big Tech. That would hurt experimentation and delay the credit revolution that $50 phones can unleash.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Apple hit with antitrust case in India over in-app payments issues, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI – Apple Inc is facing an antitrust challenge in India for allegedly abusing its dominant position in the apps market by forcing developers to use its proprietary in-app purchase system, according to a source and documents seen by Reuters.

The allegations are similar to a case Apple faces in the European Union, where regulators last year started an investigation into Apple’s imposition of an in-app fee of 30% for distribution of paid digital content and other restrictions.

The Indian case was filed by a little-known, non-profit group which argues Apple’s fee of up to 30% hurts competition by raising costs for app developers and customers, while also acting as a barrier to market entry.

“The existence of the 30% commission means that some app developers will never make it to the market … This could also result in consumer harm,” said the filing, which has been seen by Reuters.

Unlike Indian court cases, filings and details of cases reviewed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) are not made public. Apple and the CCI did not respond to a request for comment.

In the coming weeks, the CCI will review the case and could order its investigations arm to conduct a wider probe, or dismiss it altogether if it finds no merit in it, said a source familiar with the matter.

“There are high chances that an investigation can be ordered, also because the EU has been probing this,” said the person, who declined to be identified as the case details are not public.

The complainant, non-profit “Together We Fight Society” which is based in India’s western state of Rajasthan, told Reuters in a statement it filed the case in the interest of protecting Indian consumers and startups.

In India, though Apple’s iOS powered just about 2% of 520 million smartphones by end-2020 – with the rest using Android – Counterpoint Research says the U.S. firm’s smartphone base in the country has more than doubled in the last five years.

The Apple case in India comes just as South Korea’s parliament this week approved a bill that bans major app store operators like Alphabet Inc’s Google and Apple from forcing software developers to use their payment systems.

“MIDDLEMAN IN TRANSACTIONS”

Companies like Apple and Google say their fee covers the security and marketing benefits their app stores provide, but many companies disagree.

Last year, after Indian startups publicly voiced concern over a similar in-app payments fee charged by Google, the CCI ordered an investigation into it as part of a broader antitrust probe into the company. That investigation is ongoing.

The India antitrust case against Apple also alleges that its restrictions on how developers communicate with users to offer payment solutions are anti-competitive, and also hurt the country’s payment processors who offer services at lower charges in the range of 1-5%.

Apple has hurt competitors by restricting developers from informing users of alternative purchasing possibilities, thereby harming “app developers’ relationship with their customers by inserting itself as middleman in every in-app transaction,” the filing added.

In recent weeks, Apple has loosened some of the restrictions for developers globally, like allowing them to use communications – such as email – to share information about payment alternatives outside of their iOS app.

And on Wednesday, it said it would allow some apps to provide customers an in-app link to bypass Apple’s purchase system, though the U.S. firm retained a ban on allowing other forms of payment options inside apps.

Gautam Shahi, a competition law partner at Indian law firm Dua Associates, said that even if companies change their behaviour after an antitrust case in filed, the CCI still looks at past conduct.

“The CCI will look at recent years to see if the law was violated and if consumers and competition were harmed,” said Shahi.

The CCI has plans to speed up all cases involving big technology firms such as Amazon and Google by deploying additional officers and working to more stringent internal deadlines.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

BEST pushes for e-payments to save environment, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: More than 31,000 electricity consumers in island city have switched to digital payments in the past two months, with a total number of such consumers going over 6.6 lakh on Thursday, announced BEST general manager Lokesh Chandra.

This is 63 per cent of the total consumer base in Mumbai and a paperless, e-payment system is good for the environment, he said.

“We provide a discount of Rs 120 annually (Rs 10 a month) to consumers across island city if they opted for e-bill. The response has been overwhelming and more than 31,000 opted for the scheme,” Chandra said.

He further said that soon, BEST consumers can walk into any SBI branch and pay the bill by cash or cheque.

“We are also encouraging digital payment in a big way. There is a discount of 0.25 per cent of the total bill max Rs 500 for making an online payment. This includes miBEST app, payment on www.bestundertaking.net, Net Banking, credit card, debit card, Paytm, BHIM, Google pay and Amazon pay etc,” he said.

Besides, there are special incentive schemes for consumers who pay digitally regularly and at the same time, opt for e-bills for at least a year.

Such consumers will be rewarded by way of drawing lottery, and winners will get attractive rewards, he said, adding that the list of winners will be announced this month.

“The initiative is not only environment friendly, but also ensures timely and reliably receipts of bills to consumers,” he said.

Nearly 40 per cent of consumers with a majority in slum areas will be a big challenge as they may take time to switch from paper bills to digital, but BEST wants to persuade them too.

The BEST spends Rs 7.66 per paper bill every month, and so giving a Rs 10 discount per bill every month means incurring losses of Rs 2.44 per bill. This comes to Rs 3 crore losses annually for all consumers.

“We are willing to bear the losses for a paperless system as it helps save our trees,” he added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

South Korea bans Google and Apple payment monopolies, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SEOUL: South Korea’s National Assembly approved legislation on Tuesday that bans app store operators such as Google and Apple from forcing developers to use their inapp payment systems. South Korea is reportedly the first country in the world to pass such a bill, which becomes law when it is signed by the president, whose party has backed the legislation.

The tech giants have faced widespread criticism over their practice of requiring app developers to use in-app purchasing systems, for which the companies receive commissions of up to 30%. They say the commissions help pay for the cost of maintaining the app markets. The legislation prohibits the app market operators from using their monopolies to require such payment systems, which means they must allow alternative ways to pay.

It says the ban is aimed at promoting fairer competition. The bill aims to prevent any retaliation against developers by banning the companies from imposing any unreasonable delay in approving apps. The legislation also allows authorities to investigate the operations of app markets to uncover disputes and prevent actions that undermine fair competition.

Regulators in Europe, China and some other markets worry about the dominance of Apple, Google and other industry leaders in payments, online advertising and other fields. Chinese regulators have fined some companies for antimonopoly violations, while other governments are wrestling with how best to keep markets competitive. The Korea Internet Corporations Association, an industry lobby group that includes South Korea’s largest internet companies, welcomed the passage of the bill, which it said would create healthier competition.

Google said it is considering how to comply with the legislation. “Google Play provides far more than payment processing, and our service fee helps keep Android free, giving developers the tools and global platform to access billions of consumers around the world,” it said in a statement. Apple responded to an email reiterating a statement issued last week. “We believe user trust in App Store purchases will decrease as a result of this proposal — leading to fewer opportunities for the over 482,000 registered developers in Korea who have earned more than KRW8.55 trillion to date with Apple.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

For bank regulators across the world, tech giants are now too big to fail, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


More than a decade on from the financial crisis, regulators are spooked once again that some companies at the heart of the financial system are too big to fail. But they’re not banks.

This time it’s the tech giants including Google, Amazon and Microsoft that host a growing mass of bank, insurance and market operations on their vast cloud internet platforms that are keeping watchdogs awake at night.

Central bank sources told Reuters the speed and scale at which financial institutions are moving critical operations such as payment systems and online banking to the cloud constituted a step change in potential risks.

“We are only at the beginning of the paradigm shift, therefore we need to make sure we have a fit-for-purpose solution,” said a financial regulator from a Group of Seven country, who declined to be named.

It is the latest sign of how financial regulators are joining their data and competition counterparts in scrutinising the global clout of Big Tech more closely.

Banks and technology companies say greater use of cloud computing is a win-win as it results in faster and cheaper services that are more resilient to hackers and outages.

But regulatory sources say they fear a glitch at one cloud company could bring down key services across multiple banks and countries, leaving customers unable to make payments or access services, and undermine confidence in the financial system.

The U.S. Treasury, European Union, Bank of England and Bank of France are among those stepping up their scrutiny of cloud technology to mitigate the risks of banks relying on a small group of tech firms and companies being “locked in”, or excessively dependent, on one cloud provider.

“We’re very alert to the fact that things will fail,” said Simon McNamara, chief administrative officer at British bank NatWest. “If 10 organisations aren’t prepared and are connected into one provider that disappears, then we’ll all have a problem.”

The EU proposed in September that “critical” external services for the financial industry such as the cloud should be regulated to strengthen existing recommendations on outsourcing from the bloc’s banking authority that date back to 2017.

The Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meanwhile wants greater insight into agreements between banks and cloud operators and the Bank of France told lenders last month they must have a written contract that clearly defines controls over outsourced activities.

“The FPC is of the view that additional policy measures to mitigate financial stability risks in this area are needed,” it said in July.

The European Central Bank, which regulates the biggest lenders in the euro zone, said on Wednesday that bank spending on cloud computing rose by more than 50% in 2019 from 2018.

And that’s just the start. Spending on cloud services by banks globally is forecast to more than double to $85 billion in 2025 from $32.1 billion in 2020, according to data from technology research firm IDC shared with Reuters.

An IDC survey of 50 major banks globally identified just six primary providers of cloud services: IBM, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Alibaba and Oracle.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) – the largest cloud provider according to Synergy Group – posted sales of $28.3 billion in the six months to June, up 35% on the prior year and higher than its annual revenue of $25.7 billion as recently as 2018.

While all industries have ramped up cloud spending, analysts told Reuters that financial services firms had moved faster since the pandemic after an explosion in demand for online banking and emergency lending schemes.

“Banks are still very diligent but they have gained a higher level of comfort with the model and are moving at a fairly rapid pace,” said Jason Malo, director analyst at consultants Gartner.

Regulators worry that cloud failures would cause banking systems to fall over and stop people accessing their money, but say they have little visibility over cloud providers.

Last month, the Bank of England said big tech companies could dictate terms and conditions to financial firms and were not always providing enough information for their clients to monitor risks – and that “secrecy” had to end.

There is also concern that banks may not be spreading their risk enough among cloud providers.

Google told Reuters that less than a fifth of financial firms were using multiple clouds in case one failed, according to a recent survey, although 88% of those that did not spread their risk yet planned to do so within a year.

Central bank sources said part of the solution may be some form of mechanism that offers reassurance on resilience from cloud providers to banks to mitigate the sector’s aggregate exposure to one cloud service – with the banking regulator having the overall vantage point.

“Regardless of the division of control responsibilities between the cloud service provider and the bank, the bank is ultimately responsible for the effectiveness of the control environment,” the U.S. Federal Reserve said in draft guidance issued to lenders last month.

FINRA, which regulates Wall Street brokers, published a report on Monday ahead of potential rule changes to ensure that using the cloud does not harm the market or investors.

Being able to switch cloud providers easily when needed is, however, a task that is more easily said than done and could introduce disruptions to business, the FINRA report said.

Banks and tech firms contest the suggestion that greater adoption of the cloud is making the financial system’s infrastructure inherently riskier.

Adrian Poole, director for financial services in the United Kingdom and Ireland for Google Cloud, said the cloud can be more effective in bolstering a bank’s security capabilities than by building it in-house.

British digital lender Zopa said it had moved 80% of its transactions to the cloud and was working to mitigate risks. Zopa Chief Executive Jaidev Janardana said the company was also deliberately leaning on tech firms’ expertise.

“Cloud providers invest a lot of resources in security at a scale that few individual companies could manage,” he said.

Google’s Poole said the company was open to working more closely with financial regulators.

“We may one day see regulators pulling data on demand from regulated banks with cloud-enabled application programming interfaces (APIs), instead of waiting for banks to periodically push data at them,” he said.

NatWest’s McNamara said the bank was collaborating closely with tech firms and regulators to mitigate risks, and had put alternative services in place in case things went wrong.

“The buck stops with us,” McNamara said. “We don’t put all our eggs in one basket.”

One problem, though, is that not all banks have a full understanding of the risks to resiliency that could come with a wholesale shift to the cloud, said Jost Hoppermann, principal analyst at Forrester, particularly the smaller lenders.

“Some banks do not have the necessary know-how,” he said. “They think doing this will vanish all their problems, and certainly that isn’t true.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Survey, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks are taking steps to mitigate risks from their increasing use of external cloud computing services, a survey by Harris Poll and Google Cloud said on Thursday.

The Bank of England and the Bank of France have expressed concerns about a lack of transparency in how banks rely on a “concentrated” number of outside cloud computing providers like Google, Microsoft and Amazon which are beyond the arm of the regulators.

Regulators are worried that reliance by many banks on the same providers could create systemic risk if one of the cloud companies were to go down.

The survey of 1,300 leaders in financial services from the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Britain, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and Australia showed that 83% were using the cloud as part of their primary computing infrastructure.

The bulk of the companies are also considering adopting a multicloud strategy, the survey said, which would allow a bank to switch to an alternative provider if there is an outage to avoid an interruption of services for customers.

“Based on the Harris survey, it is clear that financial institutions are taking actions to solve concentration or vendor lock-in concerns with 88% of respondents not currently using a multicloud strategy considering doing so in the next 12 months,” Adrian Poole, director for financial services in Britain and Ireland for Google Cloud, said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

BIS, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less



By Marc Jones

LONDON: Central banks and financial regulators urgently need to get to grips with the growing influence of ‘Big Tech‘, according to top officials from central bank umbrella group the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

Global watchdogs are increasingly wary that the huge amounts of data controlled by groups such as Facebook, Google, Amazon and Alibaba could allow them to reshape finance so rapidly that it destabilises entire banking systems.

The BIS, in a paper led by its head Agustin Carstens, pointed to examples such as China where the two big tech payment firms Alipay and WeChat Pay now account for 94% of the mobile payments market.

China has already rattled its markets with a series of clampdowns https://www.reuters.com/world/china/no-gain-without-pain-why-chinas-reform-push-must-hurt-investors-2021-07-28 on top tech and e-commerce firms. Last November regulators torpedoed the public listing of Jack Ma’s fintech Ant Group and in the nine months since other tech giants and, lately, tutoring firms, have all faced scrutiny.

In many other jurisdictions too, tech firms are rapidly establishing footprints, with some also lending to individuals and small businesses as well as offering insurance and wealth management services.

“The entry of big techs into financial services gives rise to new challenges surrounding the concentration of market power and data governance,” the BIS paper https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull45.pdf published on Monday said.

There was scope for “specific entity-based rules” notably in the European Union, China and the United States, it added.

“Any impact on the integrity of the monetary system arising from the emergence of dominant platforms ought to be a key concern for the central bank.”

Stablecoins – cryptocurrencies pegged to existing currencies such as Facebook’s Diem – and other Big Tech initiatives could be “a game changer” for the monetary system, the paper added, if the “network effects” of social media and e-commerce platforms turbo-charged their uptake.

It could lead to a fragmentation of existing payment infrastructures to the detriment of the public good. “Given the potential for rapid change, the absence of currently dominant platforms should not be a source of comfort for central banks,” the paper said.

It said they should anticipate developments and formulate policy based on possible scenarios where Big Tech initiatives are already reshaping payments and other parts of financial systems.

“Central banks and financial regulators should invest with urgency in monitoring and understanding these developments” it added. “In this way, they can be prepared to act quickly when needed.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Google updates policy for personal loan apps; adds new norms for India, Indonesia

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Google has updated its financial services policy for developers to include clarifications related to personal loan apps, as also new requirements for such apps in India and Indonesia.

“We’re updating the Financial Services policy to clarify the definition of the total cost of the loan and require all personal loan apps be properly tagged under the Finance category. We are also adding new requirements for personal loan apps in India and Indonesia,” Google said on its support page.

The changes will be effective from September 15, 2021.

As per the policy, “Apps that provide personal loans, including but not limited to apps which offer loans directly, lead generators, and those who connect consumers with third-party lenders, must have the App Category set to “Finance” in Play Console.”

The apps will have to disclose a range of information in the app metadata including minimum and maximum period for repayment, the maximum annual percentage rate (APR), which generally includes interest rate plus fees and other costs for a year, or other similar rate consistent with local law.

“A representative example of the total cost of the loan, including the principal and all applicable fees,” explains the policy.

The apps will also be required to include a privacy policy that “comprehensively discloses the access, collection, use and sharing of personal and sensitive user data”.

Google publishes first transparency report in accordance with the new IT Rules

Google also specified additional requirements for personal loan apps in India and Indonesia. Apps must complete the additional proof of eligibility requirements in these countries.

In India, such apps will have to complete the personal loan app declaration, and provide documentation to support their declaration. For instance, for platforms licensed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to provide personal loans, they must submit a copy of their licence for review.

RBI received complaints against over 1,500 loan apps: Thakur

Platforms not directly engaged in moneylending, and only facilitating lending by registered non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) or banks, will have to accurately reflect this in the declaration.

They must also ensure that the developer account name reflects the name of the associated registered business name provided through their declaration.

Google in January this year had reviewed hundreds of personal loan apps in India and removed those that violated its policies.

The tech giant’s crackdown comes a day after the RBI announced that it has set up a working group to study all aspects of digital lending activities by both regulated and unregulated players, in a bid to put in place an appropriate regulatory approach.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Neo bank funding more than halves in pandemic even as FinTechs race ahead, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


It’s time to slow down a bit for neo banks which have seen phenomenal growth in the last few years.

Funding activity to the sector has dropped around two-thirds in 2020 over the sharp jump in 2019.

Total funding to the sector stood at $32.2 million over seven deals against $109.4 million raised through 13 deals in 2019, according to a report. In 2018, $31.9 million was raised across nine deals.

This year, there have been seven deals so far raising $22.2 million.

Around 16 new neo banks or digital banks were launched in 2019, 10 in 2020.

The Open deal

However, several large deals are in the pipeline. Amazon, Google and card network major Visa are separately eyeing a stake in neo-banking startup Open, which is looking to raise a new round of funding of about $100-$120 million, two people aware of the matter said. If successful, Open’s valuation is likely to jump three times to around $600-700 million post the funding round. Even as negotiations with the global technology majors like Amazon and Google are underway, Open is also in talks with a leading sovereign wealth fund as well as private equity firm TPG as they look to participate in the funding round that could be oversubscribed.

What is a neo bank?

Neo banks are 100% digital in nature. They operate entirely online without any physical branch. Neo Banks offer multiple financial services from money transfer to opening a bank account. Neo banks partner with the traditional banks and help them acquire customers in the most seamless manner.

ICICI Bank, India’s largest private bank has taken a lead in the Neo Banks segment and has partnered with three Neo Banks, Open, Instant Pay and Yelo.

Neo banks in India

In India lack of regulations have somewhat hindered the growth of this sector as banking regulator RBI does not recognise these companies as a separate class of banking intermediaries yet. Hence, neo-banks in India are loosely defined and don’t follow any standard regulatory code. Rather, the regulations follow the nature of partnerships they form with licensed lenders. However, a fully functional neo-bank may need approvals to be a business correspondent, a payment aggregator and require a formal agreement with a regulated bank detailing ethical lending practices.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3