Indian national sentenced to three years in US federal prison for call centre fraud

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


An Indian national from Gurugram has been sentenced to three years in federal imprisonment on charges of call centre fraud that intended to cheat Americans of millions of dollars, a US attorney said.

Sahil Narang, 29, who was in the United States illegally at the time of his arrest in May 2019, is described in court documents as a key participant in a sophisticated so-called Tech Fraud and Refund Fraud online telemarketing schemes that targeted technologically unsophisticated computer users, usually senior citizens.

Narang had pleaded guilty on December 11, 2020, to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and 10 counts of wire fraud. He was sentenced on Wednesday to 36 months in federal prison to be followed by three years of supervised release, said the Acting United States Attorney Richard B Myrus.

According to federal prosecutors, Internet pop-up advertisements were used in the Tech Fraud scheme to deceive computer users into believing that they needed computer protection services.

The pop-up ads provided a telephone number to call and when the victims dialled the number, they were routed to call centre operators who perpetuated the lie that malware had been detected on the victims’ computers. They offered the victims supposed computer protection services at exaggerated prices.

In the Refund Fraud scheme, call centre operators telephoned those who had fallen prey to the Tech Fraud and offered to refund the sum previously paid.

Through manipulation that usually involved the display of false bank account balances on the customers’ computer screens, the operators convinced the victims that sums far in excess of the refund amount had accidentally been deposited into the victims’ accounts.

As the victims had not in fact received any money, those who “returned” money were actually sending more of their own money to the fraudsters, federal prosecutors said.

According to information presented to the court, Narang and others worked together to manipulate thousands of callers employing the Tech Fraud scheme, seeking to obtain from them an estimated $1.5 million to $3 million.

An FBI investigation determined that over a nine-month period Narang routed on average more than 70 calls to call centres every day. It is also estimated that Narang’s Tech Fraud scheme was successful 30 per cent of the time.

In round two of the scheme, the Refund Fraud scheme, executed during the same nine-month period, Narang and others associated with call centres sought to obtain from their victims cumulatively $560,900.

The FBI investigation identified at least nine individuals who fell victim to the Tech Fraud Scheme at a total loss of $110,900, which the FBI was able to intercept and return to the victims. During the investigation, the FBI interceded and prevented loss when a tenth victim was on the verge of losing up to $450,000 to the fraudsters.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Loan-book fraud: Former Religare MD named beneficiary of ₹34 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police has named Sunil Godwani, former MD of financial services firm Religare Enterprises, as the beneficiary of ₹34 crore in the corporate loan-book fraud, in its supplementary charge-sheet, sources told BusinessLine.

The total outstanding in the corporate loan book as on December 2020 is ₹2,967 crore. Godwani is also a co-accused in the loan scam involving Laxmi Vilas Bank, where Religare deposited nearly ₹900 crore with the bank, which was used by the bank to further lend to entities linked to Shivinder and Malvinder Singh, erstwhile promoters of Religare Group.

Malvinder, Shivinder, Godhwani, Kavi Arora and Anil Saxena were arrested in the case by the EoW Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police in 2019, for allegedly diverting RFL’s money and investing in other companies. An FIR was registered in March 2019, after the police received a complaint from RFL’s Manpreet Suri against Malvinder, Shivinder and others, alleging that loans were taken by them while managing the firm but the money was invested in other companies.

Money-laundering case

The ED too has lodged a money-laundering case based on this. The Serious Fraud Office, after investigation, had issued an alert against Godwani leaving for overseas. In 2019, Godwani was arrested at the Delhi airport before he could leave for London. Godhwani was released on interim bail for three weeks on September 25, 2020 by the Sessions Court in Delhi.

The interim bail was extended for 10 days to October 15, 2020. Godwani was supposed to surrender on October 26 but did not do so, sources involved in the matter said. In its order dated December 4, 2020, the Sessions Court directed Godwani to surrender within two days, adn this was challenged by Godwani and the arrest was stayed by the High Court vide order dated December 5, 2020.

An FIR was registered with EOW and a criminal complaint was filed on December 19, 2018 into the matter. Godwani could not be reached on his mobile phone.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Auditor reports fresh ₹6,182-cr fraud in DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A new fraudulent transaction of ₹6,182.11 crore has been unearthed in Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd, which is set to be acquired by the Piramal Group. The disclosure was made in a report by the non-banking finance company’s transaction auditor Grant Thornton.

Based on the report, the DHFL management has filed an application with NCLT, Mumbai, against 33, including Kapil Wadhawan, Dheeraj Wadhawan, Creatoz Builders, Ikshudip Fincap, Rite Developers and other entities. DHFL has been under an RBI administrator since 2019. The central bank had superseded the DHFL board, citing governance issues and payment defaults.

The latest disclosure will, however, have no impact on the ongoing debt resolution process. Last month, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd had emerged the successful bidder for the debt-laden DHFL and the RBI has also given its approval to the plan. The lenders are now set to seek approval from the NCLT.

DHFL owes ₹81,000 crore to state-run institutions, mutual funds and retail bond holders. The debt resolution process will help lenders recover about ₹35,000 crore.

Series of fraud deals

Since 2019, a number of fraudulent transactions have been discovered. Earlier this month, on February 4, DHFL had reported fraudulent deals of ₹5,559.05 crore that were unearthed by its transaction adviser.

In December 2020, a fraud of ₹1,058.32 crore was uncovered based on an additional report filed by Grant Thornton. Similarly, in September 2020, a forensic audit by the same auditor had unearthed fraudulent transactions of over ₹17,000 crore.

Fake accounts

A whopping 2.6 lakh fake accounts were created in a Mumbai branch that itself did not exist. The ‘branch’ created fake accounts using names of account holders who had already repaid loans in full to siphon off ₹11,750 crore. Coding was done with the help of three software platforms to camouflage these transactions, according to probe documents seen by BusinessLine.

The DHFL scrip closed 4.75 per cent lower at ₹18.05 apiece on the BSE on Monday.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Punjab & Sind Bank reports fraud of Rs 94cr in NPA account, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Punjab & Sind Bank on Thursday reported a fraud of Rs 94.29 crore in an NPA account of Supertech Township Projects. In a regulatory filing, the state-owned lender said it has reported the fraud to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

“…it is informed that an NPA Account, viz M/s Supertech Township Projects Limited with outstanding dues of Rs 94.29 crore has been declared as fraud and reported to RBI today as per regulatory requirement,” the Delhi-headquartered bank said.

The account has been fully provided for as per the existing RBI norms, it added. NKD NKD RUJ RUJ

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How to spot a shaky bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In the case of Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB), RBI has capped deposit withdrawals at ₹ 25000 for a 30-day period, while a merger is in the works. If you’re keen to avoid such episodes with your bank deposits in future, how do you spot the trouble signs in a bank?

Financial checks

Growth and profits in the banking business are fuelled mainly by leverage. For every ₹ 100 of assets in a bank’s balance sheet, it may have just ₹ 4 of its own capital, with deposits and borrowings making up the rest. This is what makes banks particularly fragile entities that can be tripped up by defaults, delays in loan repayments or funding constraints.

Four financial ratios can alert you early to brewing trouble. The first is the capital adequacy or capital to risk weighted assets (CRAR) ratio, which measures the amount of its own and supplementary capital held by a bank for every rupee of loans advanced by it.

A sub-set of this is the Tier I CRAR, which represents the bank’s permanent capital consisting of equity, reserves and other capital against which losses can be set off. Indian banks are required to maintain a minimum CRAR of 10.875 per cent and Tier I CRAR of 8.875 per cent. LVB had a CRAR of just 0.17 per cent as of June 2020, with a negative Tier I CRAR. SBI, in contrast, had a CRAR of 14.87 per cent and Tier 1 CRAR of 12.10 per cent as of September 30, 2020.

Then, there’s the quantum of doubtful loans in the bank’s books, as measured by its NPA (Non-performing asset) ratio. The gross NPA ratio measures the proportion of loans given out that are overdue for over 90 days.

The net NPA ratio measures bad loans after the bank has made provisions. Broadly, gross and net NPA ratios that are below 5 per cent signal reasonable health, but trends in this ratio are more important to watch. A more than 0.5 percentage point quarterly jump in the NPA ratio suggests problems escalating.

Leverage ratio captures the extent of a bank’s Tier I capital to its total loans. The RBI allows banks to run with a ratio of 3.5-4 per cent, but a ratio above 5 is a comfortable number. HDFC Bank boasted a leverage ratio of 10.71 per cent in September 2020 quarter.

To gauge if a bank has enough cash to meet its near-term dues, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, is your guide. Measured as the high-quality liquid assets held by the bank against its dues over the next 30 days, the higher this ratio is above 100 per cent the better placed it is on liquidity. LVB was comfortable on this score with an LCR of 294 per cent in June 2020.

These ratios are readily available for every scheduled commercial bank on a quarterly basis, in the document ‘Basel III-Pillar 3’ disclosures on the bank’s website.

RBI actions

If RBI believes that a bank is walking a tightrope on indicators such as NPAs, CRAR or return on assets, it can immediately subject it to Prompt Corrective Action (PCA). During PCA, RBI can impose a variety of business restrictions on a bank, induct new management, replace Board members or even merge it with another. Most PCA measures impact a bank’s financials and growth plans, until afresh capital infusion helps them pull out of PCA.

Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India, UCO Bank and United Bank of India are under the RBI’s PCA framework. LVB was put under RBI’s PCA framework in September 2019. Depositors need to worry more about private sector banks being under PCA than public sector banks, as the latter can be quickly bailed out by the Government infusing new capital, while private banks will need to find bona fide investors.

Management churn

If a bank you’re invested with sees a string of top management exits before their term is done, it could be an indication of governance issues. The RBI actions to replace or remove the bank’s CEO or Board members or to supersede the Board are a red rag and provide early warning of suspected governance issues. Skirmishes between key shareholder factions or churn on top appointees are trouble signs, too.

LVB saw shareholders voting out the re-appointment of its MD and CEO along with a clutch of directors in its recent AGM. Yes Bank saw RBI refuse another term to its founder and a string of independent director exits before the moratorium.

Stock prices

When a bank share suffers a precipitous drop or trades at a fraction of reported book value, your antennae should be up for likely problems. A bank share trading at a fraction of its book value could mean that the stock market is under-valuing a good business. But more often, it could mean that it is sceptical about the reported value of the bank’s book. Stock markets, after all, were ahead of rating agencies in spotting problems at stressed NBFCs; they may not be far off the mark with banks.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2