Indian Bank reports ₹266.73 crore worth of fraud to RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public sector lender Indian Bank has reported ₹266.73 crore worth of fraud to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), it said in a regulatory filing on Saturday.

The bank has reported three non-performing accounts as fraudulent.

It detailed the Non Performing Accounts (NPAs) as that have been declared as fraud and reported to RBI as per regulatory requirements, it said in the filing.

The nature of fraud for all three accounts has been specified as “Diversion of funds.”

The lender has declared M P Border Checkpost Development Co Ltd as fraud with an outstanding of ₹166.89 crore, Pune Sholapur Road Development with the amount involved totaling ₹72.76 crore and M/s SONAC with an amount of ₹27.08 crore.

The bank further specified that as on September 30, 2021, it has held provisions worth ₹12.58 crore against SONAC.

In the case of M P Border Checkpost Development Co and Pune Sholapur Road Development, the provisions held were equal to the entire exposure, respectively.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HDFC Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: HDFC Bank has said that as a practice it levies processing fees on customers attempting to avail loans with discrepant or suspect documents. However, it has denied reports that these cases are not reported on the bank’s fraud reporting system.

“The bank does not waive the processing costs from customers who come forward in such discrepant/suspicious cases. The processing fee is charged towards defraying the cost of efforts of the bank for additional due diligence and verification and not for closing the cases,” HDFC Bank said.

Responding to reports that frauds are not reported by the bank, the private lender said that in all cases, the bank updates its internal database to prevent any future application from the customer and also updates industry data to prevents such borrowers from indulging in similar practises with other banks, NBFCs & financial institutions. “Collection or non-collection of processing fees has no bearing on reporting to the internal & Hunter (industry) database or attempts to report to the police authorities,” the bank said.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks may sell Rs 1 lakh crore of fraud-hit loans to NARCL, ARCs, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks may offload about Rs 1 lakh crore of accounts with fraudulent activities to National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) and other ARCs with the Reserve Bank of India allowed lenders to sell such loans.

In the last three years, banks have declared loan frauds amounting to Rs 3.95 lakh crore.

The new rule is part of the RBIs final norms on the transfer of loan exposures.

The move has opened a new avenue for ARCs, which till now were allowed to take over non-performing assets as well as loans which are in default for 60 days.

This bad loans that ARCs can take over include loan exposures classified as fraud as on the date of transfer provided that the responsibilities of the transferor with respect to continuous reporting, monitoring, filing of complaints with law enforcement agencies and proceedings related to such complaints shall also be transferred to the ARC, the central bank said. The transfer of such loan exposures to an ARC, however, does not absolve the transferor from fixing the staff accountability as required under the extant instructions on frauds.

Banks have to make 100% provision in four quarters for accounts tagged in the fraud category. In the case of non-performing assets without delayed recovery, 100% provisioning effectively happens over eight quarters.

Swiss challenge

Banks may sell Rs 1 lakh crore of fraud-hit loans to NARCL, ARCs

The RBI has clarified on the called Swiss Challenge Method, applicable while transferring stressed loans by lenders. The RBI had proposed de-regulate price discovery by departing from Swiss Challenge auction method, where the highest bid in the first round or unsolicited bid received becomes the base for seeking counter offers.

The central bank said that in cases where the aggregate exposure of lenders to a borrower whose loan is being transferred is above 1 bln rupees, Swiss Challenge method must be followed. In all other cases, the bilateral negotiations shall be subject to the price discovery and value maximisation approaches adopted by the transferor as part of the board approved policy, which may also include Swiss Challenge method, it said However, in case of such transfers used as means for resolution under the RBI’s Jun 7, 2019 circular, Swiss Challenge method would be mandatory irrespective of the exposure threshold.

The RBI said that lenders must have a board-approved policy on the adoption of Swiss Challenge method. The policy could include parameters such as a tolerance limit on haircut required by the lenders in the base-bid and minimum mark-up for over the base for seeking counter offers, the RBI said. Such minimum mark-up, difference between the challenger and the base-bid expressed as a percentage of the base-bid, must not be less than 5% and not be more than 15%.

The bad bank

Banks may sell Rs 1 lakh crore of fraud-hit loans to NARCL, ARCs

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday announced a Rs 30,600 crore government guarantee for the National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL) for acquiring stressed loan assets, paving the way for operationalisation of the bad bank.

The finance minister in Budget 2021-22 announced the setting up of a bad bank as part of the resolution of bad loans worth about Rs 2 lakh crore.

The bad bank or NARCL will pay up to 15 per cent of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85 per cent would be government-guaranteed security receipts (SRs). The government guarantee would be invoked if there is a loss against the threshold value.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

No a/c freeze till Dec for want of KYC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The RBI on Monday reiterated that until December 2021, banks cannot freeze accounts if the customer has not done a periodic KYC (know your customer) update. The central bank said this while cautioning the public not to fall prey to fraudulent messages seeking bank details for KYC updation purposes.

The RBI said it has been receiving complaints/reports about customers falling prey to frauds being perpetrated in the name of KYC updation. The RBI asked the public not to share key information like account details or passwords with unidentified persons or agencies under threat of account freeze. Many customers have avoided visiting branches during the pandemic, which has provided fraudsters an opportunity to use KYC as a reason to engage with customers.“The usual modus operandi in such cases include receipt of unsolicited communication, such as, calls, SMSs, emails urging him/her to share certain personal details, account / login details/ card information, PIN, OTP, etc or install some unauthorised/ unverified application for KYC updation using a link provided in the communication,” it said.

The RBI also said that it has made the process of KYC updation much simpler. The directions on simplified process comes in the wake of banks asking customers to fill multiple sheets of all-in-one document merely to get a periodic proof of address and identity. The central bank on Monday said that NBFCs and payment system operators seeking to obtain Aadhaar e-KYC authentication licence can submit the application with the RBI.

In May 2019, the finance ministry had come out with a detailed procedure for processing of applications (under the PML Act) for use of Aadhaar authentication services by entities other than banking companies.

“Accordingly, non-banking finance companies (NBFCs), payment system providers and payment system participants desirous of obtaining Aadhaar Authentication license — KYC User Agency (KUA) ;icense or sub-KUA license (to perform authentication through a KUA), issued by the UIDAI, may submit their application to this department for onward submission to UIDAI,” the RBI said in a circular. The RBI has also provided the format of the application.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Rana Kapoor’s wife, daughter get interim relief, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court Saturday granted interim bail to the wife and daughter of promoter of Yes Bank Ltd (YBL), Rana Kapoor who is jailed in the alleged fraud caused to the private bank.

While the CBI is probing him on corruption charges, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is investigating him in multiple cases of alleged money laundering.

In August, this year, CBI filed its supplementary chargesheet against Kapoor, his family members and four former junior employees of the bank in connection with the corruption case registered with the CBI pertaining to the loans given to DHFL.. The accused were summoned and the hearing in the said matter was scheduled for today.

Advocate Vijay Aggarwal and Advocate Rinku Garg, filed a bulky regular bail applications for Bindu Kapoor and Radha Kapoor, running into around 250 pages. The prosecution sought time to reply to the plea. The court has adjourned the matter to September 8.

Advocate Aggarwal argued before the court that his clients were charge-sheeted by the CBI without arrest and that in view of the latest judgment passed by the Supreme Court of India just two days back in Aman Preet Singh v/s CBI, his clients deserved to be granted bail.

He further argued that the court had already exercised the discretion of issuing summons to his clients, which clearly shows no need for the arrest of his clients. He contended that his clients were granted regular bail in December, 2020 by a special PMLA court in the said matter, “…which clearly shows that there were no chances of his clients absconding or tampering with evidence. Bindu Kapoor is a housewife and that Radha Kapoor Khanna had two young children so his clients shall be duly available to attend the trial”.

CBI’s counsel stated that the bail applications filed were bulky in nature and sought time to reply to it.

The court, after granting interim bail to Bindu Kapoor and Radha Kapoor Khanna, has kept the matter for reply by September 8.

According to the CBI’s first chargesheet filed last year, in June 2018, Kapoor, then the head of Yes Bank’s management credit committee, sanctioned a loan of Rs 750 crore on an application by the DHFL promoters in the name of Belief Realtors Pvt Ltd. for development of a Bandra Reclamation Project. This amount was advanced to RKW Developers, a company controlled by Dheeraj Wadhwan although the bank’s risk management team had pointed out multiple and serious issues in the proposal.

The agency’s probe revealed that the loan of Rs 750 crore was not utilised for the stated purpose.

Simultaneously, Kapil Wadhawan is said to have paid a kickback of Rs 600 crore to Kapoor and his family members in the garb of a builder loan from DHFL to DOIT Urban Ventures (India) Private Ltd. (DUVPL). Roshini Kapoor is one of the directors of DUVPL.

After deducting a processing fee, an amount of Rs 632 crore was transferred to RKW Developers. This amount was then routed to other entities controlled by the Wadhawans – KYTA Advisors and RIP Developers – to settle a loan obtained from DHFL for the same Bandra Reclamation Project in November 2015.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI to HC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a revelation, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has clarified that banks all over the country are witnessing increasing incidents of fraud due to their failure to adhere to its directives issued from time to time. In an affidavit submitted to the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court, the apex bank further disclosed that it doesn’t have the power to conduct investigations in banking frauds, nor does it have the machinery to do it.

The affidavit was filed while hearing a suo moto PIL for Rs25 crore losses caused to UCO Bank. Rajnish Vyas has been appointed as amicus curiae in the PIL. The embezzlement had taken place due to alleged forgery committed by a bank officer at its Wardha and Hinganghat branches. A division bench comprising justices Vinay Deshpande and Amit Borkar adjourned the hearing by six weeks.

Filed by RBI’s counsel SN Kumar, the affidavit added that as a regulator of the banking system in the country, it issued ‘Master Circular of Frauds’ to sensitize banks against scams and to have deterrent systems. “In spite of guidelines issued from time to time, it was observed that the frauds perpetrated in banks showed an increasing trend, mainly on account of non-adherence or improper implementation of circular directives issued by us. To enable the banks to have all current instructions in one place, a master circular incorporating all guidelines, instructions and directives on the subject was issued on August 1, 2001,” the affidavit mentioned.

Moreover, to enable the Government of India to have the required information on frauds, a suitable reporting system was introduced. Though the circular of March 22, 2002, has prescribed the period of reporting of frauds, it was realized that the banks aren’t following it scrupulously, the apex bank said.

At the RBI governor’s instance, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has set up a high-level group to study incidents of fraud and suggest measures to prevent them. “This group observed that banks are not adhering to the time frame stipulated by RBI for reporting fraud cases. It has suggested that suitable penal action should be taken against defaulting banks. The banks are supposed to report frauds within a week of their detection and then a detailed report needs to be submitted in the prescribed format in the next three weeks,” the affidavit said.

The top bank added that to minimize incidents of fraud in the banking system, it has been making continuous efforts and regularly issuing circulars directing the banks to initiate appropriate action to contain them. “The Banking Regulation Act doesn’t empower RBI to conduct any investigations. The action may be initiated only after the offence is established by the law enforcement agencies. It’s mandatory for the banks to lodge a complaint of frauds with the police,” Kumar said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IBBI puts more onus on RP, says dutybound to find frauds, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Seeking to enhance transparency in the insolvency process, IBBI has amended regulations for corporate insolvency proceedings wherein a resolution professional will be required to provide details about his or her opinion about avoidance transactions pertaining to a corporate debtor.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has amended the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations.

The amendments to the regulations are aimed at enhancing “the discipline, transparency, and accountability in corporate insolvency proceedings”.

A resolution professional is duty-bound to find out if a Corporate Debtor (CD) has been subject to avoidance transactions, namely, preferential transactions, undervalued transactions, extortionate credit transactions, fraudulent trading and wrongful trading, and file applications with the adjudicating authority seeking appropriate relief.

This not only claws back the value lost in such transactions increasing the possibility of reorganisation of the CD through a resolution plan, but also disincentivises such transactions preventing stress to the CD.

“For effective monitoring, the amendment requires the RP to file Form CIRP 8 on the electronic platform of the Board, intimating details of his opinion and determination in respect of avoidance transactions,” the release said.

The IBBI has put out the format of form CIRP 8 and it needs to be filed in respect of every CIRP ongoing or commencing on or after July 14.

Intimation of changes

With the amended regulations, an insolvency professional conducting CIRP will also have to disclose all former names and registered office address(es) so changed in the two years preceding the commencement of insolvency along with the current name and registered office address of the CD, in all its communications and records.

CIRP refers to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

The amendment takes into account the possibility where a CD may have changed its name or registered office address prior to commencement of the insolvency process. In such cases, the stakeholders may find it difficult to relate to the new name or registered office address and consequently fail to participate in the CIRP.

Roping in professionals

Under the insolvency regulations, an interim resolution professional or a resolution professional may appoint any professional, including registered valuers, to assist him in the discharge of his duties in the conduct of the CIRP.

“The amendment provides that the IRP/RP may appoint a professional, other than registered valuers if he is of the opinion that the services of such professional are required and such services are not available with the CD.

“Such appointments shall be made on an arm’s length basis following an objective and transparent process. The invoice for a fee shall be raised in the name of the professional and be paid into his bank account,” the release said. The amendments have come into effect from July 14.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Mallya/Nirav Modi fraud cases: Latest recovery of ₹1,850 cr redeems 58% of banks’ losses

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks have now recovered 58 per cent of the amount they were defrauded by Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi. While the SBI-led consortium got another ₹792.11 crore from sale of shares held in Mallya’s Kingfisher airline, other banks have got ₹1,060-crore assets from the Fugitive Economic Offences Court in the PNB-Nirav Modi Case

Total amount

The Enforcement Directorate on Friday said while the public sector banks were defrauded of ₹22,585.83 crore, recovery and transfer of assets as of date total ₹12,762.25 crore. The ED has attached assets worth ₹18,217.27 crore under the provision of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act from the three fugitives.

“Today, the SBI-led consortium has realised ₹792.11 crore by sale of shares in Kingfisher Airlines/Vijay Mallya case. These shares were handed over by the ED to the consortium. Earlier, SBI led consortium had realised ₹7,181.50 crore by liquidating assets handed over to it,” said an ED statement.

Earlier recovery

A few days back, the ED had handed over ₹3,728.64-crore assets to the SBI-led consortium including shares of ₹3,644.74 crore, Demand Draft of ₹54.33 crore and immovable properties worth ₹29.57 crore.

Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi are wanted by India for defrauding Punjab National Bank (PNB) of over ₹14,000 crore. They fled the country in January 2018 before their scam of using fake Letters of Undertakings (LoUs) to cheat the bank came to light.

Vijay Mallya had fled to the UK in 2016 after his Kingfisher Airlines collapsed. Mallya had borrowed to keep the consistently loss-making airline in air. By 2012, Kingfisher was declared an NPA by SBI. Accused of fraud and money laundering, Mallya owes 17 Indian banks about ₹9,000 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Punjab & Sind Bank declares loans worth Rs 150 cr to IL&FS Transportation as fraud, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public sector lender Punjab & Sind Bank on Tuesday said it has declared the account of IL&FS Transportation Network Ltd (ITNL) with total dues of Rs 149.98 crore as fraud.

The said account has been reported to the RBI.

It is informed that an NPA Account, viz IL&FS Transportation Network Limited (ITNL) with outstanding dues of Rs 149.98 crore has been declared as fraud and reported to the RBI as per regulatory requirement, Punjab & Sind Bank said in a filing.

Further, it said, the account has been fully provided for as per the existing RBI norms.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2