Financial planning for a family of 4

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Sankaran (42) and his wife Revathi (39), parents of 2 children, work in the IT industry. They want a financial plan to achieve their goals in future. They had prioritised their key goals as follows.

1. Education fund for kids, aged 9 and 4.

2. House at the earliest, preferably a 3-BHK in Chennai at a cost of ₹1.2 crore

3. Investing for retirement

4. New car at an additional cost of ₹8 lakh in 2022

5. Protection of family from unfortunate events

The family’s cash flow and assets are as follows:

 

All the investments in real estate were made based on third party compulsion in the last 4 to 5 years. They had not seen their assets appreciate considerably. They had sought unit-linked insurance policies on the assumption that they were investing in mutual funds. They had started to invest in mutual funds two to three years ago. With home loan interest rates at attractive levels and surplus cash available in hand, the couple wanted to buy a house.

Sankaran did not exhibit confidence of getting any substantial increase in his salary in the coming years. Revathi was comfortable continuing with her employment.

 

We reviewed their investments and recommended the following.

a) Build up ₹ 6 lakh towards an emergency fund

b) Set up protection by buying term insurance for Sankaran for a sum assured of ₹1 crore and Revathi for ₹1 crore without riders.

c) Buying health insurance for the family for a sum insured of ₹10 lakh. Though the family is covered for medical emergencies through employer-provided group insurance, these covers had many restrictions along with low sum insured. The health cover was also insufficient considering their life style

d) Keep track of spending for the next one year to ascertain their actual monthly expenses. The expenses may have come down because of the Covid lockdown and that they could go back to their old spending habits once life returned to normal.

e) Restructure their holdings in unit-linked insurance plans within the next one year, mainly to reduce the annual commitment. This would reduce the premium commitments from ₹ 6 lakh per annum to ₹1 lakh per annum

f) Sell two of their plots of land to partially fund the house purchase, so that their leverage could be restricted and an unproductive asset monetised. This would help them to buy a house for ₹1.2 crore while also restricting the loan component to ₹60-70 lakh.

With adequate contingency measures in place, reduced premium commitments and surplus available as cash, they were better placed to service the housing loan without additional financial burden. They were also advised to reduce expenses wherever possible to foreclose the loan in the next 8 to 10 years.

Education goal

Towards elder son’s education, they would require about ₹35 lakh in the next nine years. They would also require ₹57 lakh for the younger son’s education. (Current cost for education is presumed at ₹15 lakh with inflation assumed at 10 per cent).

At 11 per cent expected return, they would need to invest ₹14,000 and ₹16,000 per month in large-cap mutual funds to fund these two education goals.

Retirement goal

We recommended that they invest ₹25,000 in large-cap mutual funds towards their retirement corpus. With an expected return of 11 per cent over the next 20 years, they would be able to achieve a corpus of ₹2.16 crore. Along with regular PF and NPS accumulations that they were making, they should be able to reach a sizeable corpus towards retirement.

Other facets

To become successful investors, we encouraged them to keep an ‘Investing Behaviour Journal’ to keep a record of their emotions as and when there were wild swings in the markets either up or down.

The writer, Co-founder of Chamomile Investment Consultants in Chennai, is an investment advisor registered with SEBI

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How you should evaluate returns from bonds

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Retail investors have flocked to the ₹5,000-crore bond offer from Power Finance Corporation (PFC), prompting an early closure. One hopes they’ve applied with a good understanding of how this bond compares to other fixed-income avenues. The offer did have some attractive options for retail folks. But reports that did the rounds of the mainstream and social media suggested that when it comes to evaluating bond returns, it is quite okay to compare apples not just to oranges, but also to grapes.

Mind the risks

Company officials promoting the PFC bond were eager to explain how it offered better returns than the National Savings Certificates (NSC). This isn’t strictly true. But even if it were, higher rates on the PFC bond, far from making it more attractive, would indicate higher risks to your capital. In the bond market, high interest rates correlate directly to credit risk.

As a key lender to the troubled power sector with gross NPAs of 7.4 per cent in FY20, PFC’s business carries a fair degree of risk. This is mitigated by the Government of India owning 55.9 per cent stake in PFC, lending it a quasi-government status. The PFC bond is a riskier instrument than the NSC because the latter is Central government-backed and doesn’t require you to take on any business risks.

When evaluating an NCD, it is best to see how much of a spread (extra return) it is offering over a risk-free instrument, which is a Central government bond. Today, the market yield on the five-year government bond is 5.3 per cent. At 5.8 per cent, the five-year PFC bond offered a 50-basis point spread over the G-Secs.

At 6.8 per cent, the NSC, which carries lower risks than PFC, offers 150 basis points (bps) over the G-sec, making it a better choice. The average spreads on five-year AAA, AA and A rated bonds over comparable government securities are currently 37 bps, 104 bps and 300 bps, respectively.

Check tenure

Bank fixed deposits tend to be the default option for investors seeking safety. So, many comparisons have been made between the PFC bonds and bank FDs. Most of these are simplistic comparisons of 5- and 10-year PFC bonds (coupons of 5.8 per cent and 7 per cent) with SBI’s 1- to 5-year deposit rates (5-5.4 per cent).

But it is plain wrong to compare rates on a 1-5 year instrument with a 5-10 year instrument. In the fixed-income market, investors are always compensated for longer holding periods with higher rates, given the time value of money and higher business uncertainties that come with lending for the longer term. If you would really like to compare PFC’s bonds with bank FDs, you would be better off looking at similar tenures. PFC’s three-year bond offered 4.8 per cent against the 5.3 per cent on SBI’s three-year FD. Its five-year bond will fetch 5.8 per cent against 5.4 per cent on the SBI FD.

Even then, the decision on the tenure of fixed-income security what you should buy should be based on your view on how interest rates will move in future and not on absolute rates.

If you buy a 10-year bond today and rates move up in the next 2-3 years, you’d risk capital losses if you try to switch to better-rated instruments.

Beware of market risks

Some have compared PFC bonds to debt mutual funds and concluded the latter are better.

Debt mutual funds which invest in high-quality bonds (corporate debt funds and PSU & banking funds) have delivered category returns of over 9 per cent for one year and 8 per cent for three and five years.

But comparing trailing returns of debt funds to the future returns on PFC bonds is akin to zipping on a highway using the rear-view mirror.

Returns on debt funds in the last one, three and five years have been boosted by falling rates triggering bond price gains.

Should rates bottom out or begin to rise, these gains can swiftly turn into losses. To gauge future returns on debt funds, the current yield to maturity (YTM) of their portfolios and their expense ratios are more useful.

Current YTMs of corporate bond funds are in the 4.5-5.5 per cent range with annual expenses at 0.4-1 per cent for regular plans, pointing to returns of 3.5-5.1 per cent from here, without budgeting for rate hikes. PFC bonds, by offering you a predictable 5.8 per cent for five years, are a better bet if you think rates are bottoming out.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY