EU to tighten rules on cryptoasset transfers, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Companies that transfer bitcoin or other cryptoassets must collect details of senders and recipients to help authorities crack down on dirty money, EU policymakers proposed on Tuesday in the latest efforts to tighten regulation of the sector.

The law proposed by the European Commission, the EU executive, would apply what is known as the travel rule to crypto transactions to make them traceable.

The rule, which is one of the recommendations of the inter-governmental watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), already applies to wire transfers.

“Today’s amendments will ensure full traceability of crypto-asset transfers, such as bitcoin, and will allow for prevention and detection of their possible use for money laundering or terrorism financing,” the Commission said in a statement.

A company handling cryptoassets for a customer must include the customer’s name, address, date of birth and account number, and the name of the person who will receive the cryptoassets.

The recipient’s service provider must also check if any of the required information is missing.

Providing anonymous crypto-asset wallets will also be prohibited, just as anonymous bank accounts are already banned under EU anti-money laundering rules.

“These proposals have been designed to find the right balance between addressing these threats and complying with international standards while not creating excessive regulatory burden on the industry,” the European Commission said.

“On the contrary, these proposals will help the EU crypto-asset industry develop, as it will benefit from an updated, harmonised legal framework across the EU.”

EU states and the European Parliament have the final say on the proposals, meaning it could take two years for them to become law.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UAE says to launch digital currency within five years, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The United Arab Emirates will launch its first digital currency by 2026, the central bank of the oil-rich Gulf state, which serves as the region’s financial hub, said Monday.

Several central banks around the world have recently announced similar plans while criticising decentralised cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

The Emirates central bank said its plans include “issuing a digital currency and driving digital transformation in the UAE‘s financial services sector, by utilising the latest artificial intelligence and big data solutions.”

The announcement is part of its “2023-2026 strategy” which aims to “position it among the world’s top 10 central banks”, it said according to state media.

In 2019, Saudi Arabia and the UAE announced a test phase of a common cryptocurrency for cross-border transactions.

The UAE has big tech ambitions, investing in artificial intelligence, launching a space program, and hosting the regional headquarters of large multinational digital firms.

Faced with increasing popularity of the cryptocurrency bitcoin, as well as for online payments during the pandemic, central banks are exploring new units of their own.

China launched the race in March with the start of a test phase of its digital yuan.

The central banks of the United States, the European Union and England are also evaluating the possibility of launching their own digital currencies, which are designed to bring stability to a highly speculative sector.

Created in 2008 as an alternative to traditional currencies, bitcoin is the world’s most popular virtual unit.

But its price has slumped recently due to fresh moves from China to crack down on cryptocurrencies.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU watchdog tells banks to have a 10-year climate plan, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks in the European Union must have a 10-year plan spelling out how they will deal with environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks to their bottom line, the bloc’s banking watchdog said on Wednesday.

Increasing volumes of money are going into climate-friendly investments and regulators want investors to have a reliable snapshot of a company’s green credentials.

A report from the European Banking Authority (EBA) on Wednesday set out recommendations for banks and their supervisors for approaching ESG risks and help the EU meet its goals of cutting carbon emissions by 2050.

Banks should plan strategically over a period of at least 10 years to show their resilience to different scenarios, disclose strategic ESG objectives, and assess the need to develop sustainable products, EBA said.

Climate risks can include “physical” or weather-related events like floods, and “transition” risks from sudden changes in asset values.

The EBA report looks at the second pillar of core banking rules that assess how risks at a lender are managed.

It is expected to set out detailed guidance for the third pillar relating to disclosures of risks later in the year. Work on pillar one or whether actual capital requirements need changing to reflect ESG risks, is expected at a later date.

EBA ESG Graphic https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/rlgpddrqjpo/EBA%20ESG%20Graphic.PNG

The report builds on existing EU initiatives such as a taxonomy that defines a sustainable product, and disclosure rules for all types of companies.

The European Central Bank which regulates top euro zone lenders will use the report from the end of 2022 for updating its annual “SREP” review of whether banks hold enough capital to cover risks on their books.

All EU banking supervisors will be required to apply the report or explain any gaps.

“We are putting an initial emphasis on climate-related risks as data is more advanced, but banks should also advance their identification and understanding of social and governance risks,” said Fabien Le Tennier, a policy expert in EBA’s ESG Risks unit.

Banks typically plan strategically for up to five years ahead at present.

“Most of our recommendations will not come as a surprise for banks, but there will probably be a challenge for banks to meet all of them, at least in the near term,” Le Tennier said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Green’ to be soon the colour of money for European banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The European Union is working on new rules where banks will have to state the “greenness” of their activities, or what share of their business is financing climate-friendly activities — a move that would impact profitability in an increasingly environmentally conscious world.

The so-called green asset ratio (GAR) measure is meant to help inform stakeholders — including investors, employees and depositors — of a bank’s commitment to disinvesting from fossil fuels by revealing what proportion of its assets are environmentally sound.

How would it work

Depending on its relative shade of green, a lender’s funding costs could be at stake, as well as its ability to retain talent and its attractiveness to customers. Unlike banks’ other complex financial metrics, a green label may resonate with a much broader public that’s increasingly conscious of companies’ role in society.

However, there is a lot of uncertainty around what will be included in the GAR. If too many banking activities are included it may unnecessarily hit some lenders, and if only a few are included there is danger of “greenwashing.” Also, the banks may shift dirty business to where it isn’t captured in the GAR.

While the European Union proposed measuring green assets against banks’ entire activities, including derivatives, the European Banking Authority has a different view. It favours excluding derivatives entirely from the calculation and reporting so-called “capital markets indicators” separately.

The EBA’s proposal could let banks off the hook on climate change by possibly flattering their green asset ratios. Derivatives are a significant and somewhat risky part of investment banking so their inclusion in the GAR would make a difference. Worse, some lenders might take on greater risk by structuring non-green deals as derivatives to keep them out of the GAR calculations.

Where do European banks stand?

French banks are known for dominating their home market, but they’re considered also-rans on the global stage when compared with US lenders. That’s not the case in the world of green banking. Credit Agricole is the leading underwriter of green bonds, three places ahead of the much larger JPMorgan since the end of 2015, according to an analysis on activity from almost 140 banks around the world by Bloomberg. Two other Paris-based banks, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale, rank in the top 10 in the league table.

French banks were early in identifying green lending as a way to differentiate themselves from their rivals, said Maia Godemer, a London-based researcher at BloombergNEF, a clean-energy think tank. Green debt offerings have been steadily increasing for the past five years, and 2021 is shaping up to be the biggest yet. Issuers have sold more than $187 billion of green bonds so far in 2021, almost triple the pace from the year-earlier period.

A renewable energy market

The underwriting market for renewable-energy companies is minuscule when compared with the funds that fossil-fuel companies are raking in. Since the start of 2016, renewable-energy producers have raised less than $160 billion in the debt markets, compared with the $3.6 trillion for non-renewable energy producers, according to Bloomberg data. This year, when one would expect the spread to be narrowing, green energy providers have received less than $10 billion from bond sales and loans, while fossil-fuel companies got almost $190 billion. The leading lenders to renewable-energy companies since 2016 include Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, BNP Paribas and Australia & New Zealand Banking Group. Bank of America was the top U.S. bank, placing 11th in the league table.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU fines UBS, Nomura, UniCredit $452 million over bond cartel, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


European Union antitrust regulators fined UBS, UniCredit and Nomura 371 million euros ($452 million) on Thursday in connection with a European government bond trading cartel.

The penalties are the latest to punish the financial industry for alleged involvement in foreign exchange cartels, Euribor and Libor benchmark cartels, and bonds cartels.

The three banks said in statements that they would appeal or were considering doing so.

The European Commission said the European government bond cartel ran from 2007 to 2011, with traders from the banks informing each other on their prices and volumes offered in the run-up to the auctions and the prices being shown to their customers or to the market in general via multilateral chatrooms on Bloomberg terminals.

“A well-functioning European government bonds market is paramount both for the eurozone member states issuing these bonds to generate liquidity and the investors buying and trading them,” European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.

UBS said the fine related to “a legacy issue” and it had since taken action to improve its processes.

“Taking into account relevant provisions, this matter may have an impact of up to $100 million on UBS’s second quarter 2021 results,” it said.

UniCredit said the findings did not show any “wrongdoing on its part”.

“UniCredit will appeal the decision before the European Courts,” the Italian bank said in a statement.

Nomura said it had introduced measures to ensure “the highest levels of integrity at all times” and would consider all options, including an appeal.

“The decision issued today by the European Commission and associated fine imposed on Nomura relates to historic behaviour by two former Nomura employees for an approximate 10 month period in 2011,” it said.

The European Commission said Bank of America, RBS (now known as NatWest), Natixis and WestLB (now known as Portigon) also took part in the cartel.

NatWest escaped a 260-million-euro fine as it alerted the cartel to the EU competition watchdog. Bank of America and Natixis were also not fined because their infringement falls outside the limitation period for imposition of fines, the Commission said.

It said Portigon, the legal and economic successor to WestLB, received a zero fine as it did not generate any net turnover in the last business year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HODL your horses, cryptos face possible hurdles ahead, experts say, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Evolving rules, environmental concerns and competition from central banks threaten to undermine many of the world’s fast-growing crypto assets, crypto and macro experts said, while creating opportunities for those able to adapt.

Europe and the United States are both working on regulating digital assets and their providers – moves welcomed by investors, who hope the new ground rules will encourage institutional investors to plunge in.

Anatoly Crachilov, co-founder and CEO of Nickel Digital Asset Management, which manages assets worth $200 million, told the Reuters Global Markets Forum that regulatory uncertainty was a drag on the development of the crypto space.

He described the promise by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission‘s new Chairman Gary Gensler, to provide “guidance and clarity” to the market during his confirmation hearing in March, as a turning point.

For its part the European Commission‘s proposed “Markets in Crypto-assets,” or MiCA regulation, will regulate crypto-assets and their service providers in the European Union.

“It will be a new banking sector, with passporting possibilities,” digital asset trading solutions company H-Finance CEO Vytautas Zabulis said, referring to the prospect of EU-wide cryptocurrency trading licences.

Alongside the evolving regulatory framework, some countries, including China, Britain and Russia, are considering launching their own central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

That is likely to be followed by legislation to tax gains, said Robert Carnell, chief economist and head of research at ING Asia. “That may be the death knell for these other cryptocurrencies, though central bank coins are on the up and up,” he said.

Zabulis said that if CBDCs were developed in a way that they were “easy to interact with,” most digital currencies used for settlements will likely lose their both their goal and value.

There was not a big argument for bitcoin becoming a settlement tool, Zabulis cautioned. “Blockchain technology is for that, so, CBDCs will be built on blockchain.”

Bitcoin BTC=BTSP traded around $54,000 following a 10% surge on Monday, driven by reports that JPMorgan Chase JPM.N is planning to offer a managed bitcoin fund.

CBDCs are expected to have a limited impact on Bitcoin in particular, due to its progressively limited supply, which is in contrast to traditional fiat systems, Crachilov said.

“No central bank currency, however digital, can offer scarcity at this stage, as its supply can be inflated by a respective central bank issuing entity,” Crachilov said.

If China saw bitcoin as a threat to its own planned digital currency, that could affect the whole industry, Zabulis said.

GREEN REVOLUTION?
Creating crypto assets leaves a heavy carbon footprint, and is being increasingly seen as environmentally unsustainable.

ING Asia’s Carnell said there was “a strong argument on environmental grounds for limiting crypto mining, or at least having them offset their wasteful practices.”

However, bitcoin enthusiast Raoul Pal said he was not worried about the “unsustainability narrative”.

Pal, founder and CEO of on-demand financial TV channel Real Vision, said he believed it would drive a “green revolution” because in the end that was “the only way to win”.

Nickel Digital’s Crachilov said his fund was seeing a higher demand for ESG-compliant cryptos. “The price competition drives miners towards the cheapest sources of energy — renewables are increasingly falling into this category,” he said.

Ethereum 2 will use “proof of stake versus proof of work,” H-Finance’s Zabulis said. “It means that it will drastically reduce the energy needed” to mine it.

Garrett Minks, chief technology officer at Delaware-based RAIR Technologies, said the idea is to “trade brute force electricity burning with fancier math”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Five things shaping Britain’s financial rulebooks after Brexit, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Britain is conducting a review of its financial rulebooks and policies to see how it can keep its 130 billion pound ($184 billion) finance sector competitive after Brexit left it largely cut off from the European Union.

The government is due to issue papers in the coming days outlining its approach to financial technology (fintech) and capital markets, while further down the line it’s expected to propose changes to the funds and insurance sectors.

Here are five things set to shape the City of London financial hub following its loss of access to the EU:

BIG BANG DEBATE
Britain’s finance ministry is reviewing financial regulation and insurance capital rules, with minister Rishi Sunak raising the prospect of a “Big Bang 2.0” to maintain the City’s competitiveness, a reference to liberalisation of trading in the 1980s.

But it’s unclear how far any deregulation could go given that Britain says it won’t undermine global standards.

UK Finance, a banking body, wants a formal remit for regulators to ditch rules that put them at a competitive disadvantage globally. Insurers want cuts in capital requirements to free up cash for green and long term investments.

But the Bank of England says the City must not become an “anything goes” financial centre, and that insurers hold the right amount of capital.

Cross-border firms want to avoid Britain diverging from international norms as this would add to compliance costs.

City veterans say Britain should focus on allowing firms to hire globally, and ensuring that regulators respond nimbly and proportionately to crypto-assets, sustainable finance, long-term investing and restructurings after COVID-19.

COPYING NEW YORK
London has fallen behind New York in attracting company flotations and a government-backed review of listing rules is likely to recommend allowing “dual class” shares and a lower “free float”, perhaps for a limited period.

Dual class shares are stocks in the same company with different voting rights, while “free float” refers to the proportion of a company’s shares that are publicly available.

The potential changes could attract more tech and fintech companies whose founders typically want to retain a large degree of control.

It could also recommend making it easier for special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) – businesses that raise money on stock markets to buy other companies – an area in which New York has also dominated, with Amsterdam catching up fast.

UK asset managers warn that strong corporate governance standards could be diluted by tinkering with listing rules.

BEYOND SANDBOXES
Britain is home to one of the world’s biggest innovative fintech sectors, its “sandboxes” – which allow fintech firms to test new products on real consumers under regulatory supervision – copied across the world. But Brexit means Britain has to work harder to attract and retain fintechs as they will no longer have direct access to the world’s biggest trading area.

A government-backed review to buttress the sector is due to report back on Friday with recommendations that could include cutting red tape for fintechs that want to recruit staff from across the world, and make listing in Britain more attractive.

Other ideas could include helping fledgling fintech navigate government departments and regulators more easily, along with ways of boosting funding for start-ups.

FUNDS ARE THE FUTURE
Britain is reviewing how to make itself a more competitive place for listing investment funds, a core tool for bringing fresh capital into markets.

UK-based asset managers run many funds listed in the EU, but this global system of cross-border management known as delegation could be tightened up by the bloc.

Having more funds listed in Britain would also mean that the shares they hold would be traded in London. Billions of euros in trading euro shares have left the UK for Amsterdam since Brexit due to the bloc’s restrictions on where funds can trade shares.

THINK GLOBAL
As the City will get only limited access at best to the EU, industry officials say it makes more sense to focus on getting better access to other markets like Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan and the United States, while at the same time keeping the UK financial market open to the world, including the EU.

Negotiations between Britain and Switzerland for a “mutual recognition” deal in financial rules is the way to go, industry officials say. Better global access would also keep the City ahead of EU centres like Amsterdam, Paris and Frankfurt.

($1 = 0.7056 pounds)

(Reporting by Huw Jones. Editing by Mark Potter)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2