New global rules leave just 10 big EU banks short of capital, draft shows, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


* Capital shortfall seen at less than 27 bln euros

* Basel III directive also tackles climate change, branches

FRANKFURT, – Only 10 major European banks may need to raise capital as a result of the rollout of new global rules and their shortfall could be smaller than 27 billion euros ($31.43 billion), according to draft European Union regulation seen by Reuters.

The impact would be much smaller than the 52.2 billion euros estimated by the European Banking Authority (EBA) last year, a sigh of relief for a sector that has been plagued by low profits for a decade and is still recovering from a pandemic-induced recession.

The draft of European Commission‘s Basel III directive, which transposes the final batch of global rules aimed at avoiding a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis, put the increase to EU banks’ minimum capital requirements at between 0.7% and 2.7% by 2015 and 6.4%-8.4% by 2030.

“According to estimates provided by the EBA, this impact could lead a limited number of large EU banks (10 out of 99 banks in the test sample) to have to raise collectively… less than 27 billion euros,” the Commission said in the document.

The EBA said the banks in the test sample were from 17 EU countries and represented around 75% of total EU banks’ assets.

Banks had lobbied for a more flexible interpretation of the “output floor”, which limits their discretion in setting their own capital requirement, but their wishes were not fulfilled.

The European Parliament will have the final say on approving the rules, but regulators have warned the bloc not to stray from the standards already agreed at a global level.

The directive, which is due to be published next week, also gives supervisors the power to impose requirements relating to climate risk and contains stricter rules for branches of foreign banks in the EU.

This gives extra legal backing to the European Central Bank, which has been putting pressure on banks to disclose and tackle risks relating to climate change, such as weather hazards and changes in regulation.

As regards foreign branches, which had assets worth 510 billion euros at the end of last year and are concentrated in Belgium, France, Germany and Luxembourg, they will now be subject to a common authorisation procedure.

They will also have to comply with requirements relating to their capital, liquidity, governance and risk management, the draft shows. ($1 = 0.8591 euros) (Reporting by Huw Jones, Writing By Francesco Canepa in Frankfurt, Editing by Alex Richardson)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU supervisors call for implementation of global banking rules, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A group of bank supervisors from across the European Union called on Tuesday for the bloc to implement global banking rules agreed to prevent a repeat of the global financial crisis.

In an open letter to the European Commission, nearly two dozens central banks and regulators defended the Basel III rules, which have been the object of intense lobbying from a banking industry keen to reduce its capital requirements.

“We, as prudential supervisors and central banks in the EU, very much support a full, timely and consistent implementation of all aspects of this framework,” the signatories said.

“The pandemic shows that more resilient banks are better able to support the real economy, even during times of crisis.”

The signatories came out in defence of the “output floor”, which limits banks’ discretion in setting their own capital requirements and of a standardised approach to credit risk, while adding that EU-specific deviations should be minimised.

Signatories included institutions from all large EU countries with the exception of France. (Reporting By Francesco Canepa Editing by Balazs Koranyi)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Citi, HSBC, Prudential hatch plan for Asian coal-fired plants closure, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LONDON/MELBOURNE: Financial firms including British insurer Prudential, lenders Citi and HSBC and BlackRock Real Assets are devising plans to speed the closure of Asia’s coal-fired power plants in order to lower the biggest source of carbon emissions, five people with knowledge of the initiative said.

The novel proposal, which includes the Asian Development Bank (ADB), offers a potentially workable model and early talks with Asian governments and multilateral banks are promising, the sources told Reuters.

The group plans to create public-private partnerships to buy out the plants and wind them down within 15 years, far sooner than their usual life, giving workers time to retire or find new jobs and allowing countries to shift to renewable energy sources.

It aims to have a model ready for the COP26 climate conference which is being held in Glasgow, Scotland in November.

The initiative comes as commercial and development banks, under pressure from large investors, pull back from financing new power plants in order to meet climate targets.

An ADB executive told Reuters that a first purchase under the proposed scheme, which will comprise a mix of equity, debt and concessional finance, could come as soon as next year.

“If you can come up with an orderly way to replace those plants sooner and retire them sooner, but not overnight, that opens up a more predictable, massively bigger space for renewables,” Donald Kanak, chairman of Prudential’s Insurance Growth Markets, told Reuters.

Coal-fired power accounts for about a fifth of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, making it the biggest polluter.

The proposed mechanism entails raising low cost, blended finance which would be used for a carbon reduction facility, while a separate facility would fund renewable incentives.

HSBC declined to comment on the plan.

Finding a way for developing nations in Asia, which has the world’s newest fleet of coal plants and more under construction, to make the most of the billions already spent and switch to renewables has proved a major challenge.

The International Energy Agency expects global coal demand to rise 4.5% in 2021, with Asia making up 80% of that growth.

Meanwhile, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is calling for a drop in coal-fired electricity from 38% to 9% of global generation by 2030 and to 0.6% by 2050.

MAKING IT VIABLE

The proposed carbon reduction facility would buy and operate coal-fired power plants, at a lower cost of capital than is available to commercial plants, allowing them to run at a wider margin but for less time in order to generate similar returns.

The cash flow would repay debt and investors.

The other facility would be used to jump start investments in renewables and storage to take over the energy load from the plants as it grows, attracting finance on its own.

The model is already familiar to infrastructure investors who rely on blended finance in so-called public-private deals, backed by government-financed institutions.

In this case, development banks would take the biggest risk by agreeing to take first loss as holders of junior debt as well as accepting a lower return, according to the proposal.

“To make this viable on more than one or two plants, you’ve got to get private investors,” Michael Paulus, head of Citi’s Asia-Pacific public sector group, who is involved in the initiative, told Reuters.

“There are some who are interested but they are not going to do it for free. They may not need a normal return of 10-12%, they may do it for less. But they are not going to accept 1 or 2%. We are trying to figure out some way to make this work.”

The framework has already been presented to ASEAN finance ministers, the European Commission and European development officials, Kanak, who co-chairs the ASEAN Hub of the Sustainable Development Investment Partnership, said.

Details still to be finalised include ways to encourage coal plant owners to sell, what to do with the plants once they are retired, any rehabilitation requirements, and what role if any carbon credits may play.

The firms aim to attract finance and other commitments at COP26, when governments will be asked to commit to more ambitious emissions targets and increase financing for countries most vulnerable to climate change.

U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration has re-entered the Paris climate accord and is pushing for ambitious reductions of carbon emissions, while in July, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the heads of major development banks, including ADB and the World Bank, to devise plans to mobilize more capital to fight climate change and support emission cuts.

A Treasury official told Reuters that the plans for coal plant retirement are among the types of projects that Yellen wants banks to pursue, adding the administration is “interested in accelerating coal transitions” to tackle the climate crisis.

ASIA STEPS

As part of the group’s proposal, the ADB has allocated around $1.7 million for feasibility studies covering Indonesia, Philippines and Vietnam, to estimate the costs of early closure, which assets could be acquired, and engage with governments and other stakeholders.

“We would like to do the first (coal plant) acquisition in 2022,” ADB Vice President Ahmed M. Saeed told Reuters, adding the mechanism could be scaled up and used as a template for other regions, if successful. It is already in discussions about extending this work to other countries in Asia, he added. To retire 50% of a country’s capacity early at $1 million-$1.8 million per megawatt suggests Indonesia would require a total facility of roughly $16-$29 billion, while Philippines would be about $5-$9 billion and Vietnam around $9-$17 billion, according to estimates by Prudential’s Kanak.

One challenge that needs to be tackled is the potential risk of moral hazard, said Nick Robins, a London School of Economics sustainable finance professor.

“There’s a longstanding principle that the polluter should pay. We need to make absolutely sure that we are not paying the polluter, but rather paying for accelerated transition,” he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU to tighten rules on cryptoasset transfers, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Companies that transfer bitcoin or other cryptoassets must collect details of senders and recipients to help authorities crack down on dirty money, EU policymakers proposed on Tuesday in the latest efforts to tighten regulation of the sector.

The law proposed by the European Commission, the EU executive, would apply what is known as the travel rule to crypto transactions to make them traceable.

The rule, which is one of the recommendations of the inter-governmental watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), already applies to wire transfers.

“Today’s amendments will ensure full traceability of crypto-asset transfers, such as bitcoin, and will allow for prevention and detection of their possible use for money laundering or terrorism financing,” the Commission said in a statement.

A company handling cryptoassets for a customer must include the customer’s name, address, date of birth and account number, and the name of the person who will receive the cryptoassets.

The recipient’s service provider must also check if any of the required information is missing.

Providing anonymous crypto-asset wallets will also be prohibited, just as anonymous bank accounts are already banned under EU anti-money laundering rules.

“These proposals have been designed to find the right balance between addressing these threats and complying with international standards while not creating excessive regulatory burden on the industry,” the European Commission said.

“On the contrary, these proposals will help the EU crypto-asset industry develop, as it will benefit from an updated, harmonised legal framework across the EU.”

EU states and the European Parliament have the final say on the proposals, meaning it could take two years for them to become law.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

EU fines UBS, Nomura, UniCredit $452 million over bond cartel, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


European Union antitrust regulators fined UBS, UniCredit and Nomura 371 million euros ($452 million) on Thursday in connection with a European government bond trading cartel.

The penalties are the latest to punish the financial industry for alleged involvement in foreign exchange cartels, Euribor and Libor benchmark cartels, and bonds cartels.

The three banks said in statements that they would appeal or were considering doing so.

The European Commission said the European government bond cartel ran from 2007 to 2011, with traders from the banks informing each other on their prices and volumes offered in the run-up to the auctions and the prices being shown to their customers or to the market in general via multilateral chatrooms on Bloomberg terminals.

“A well-functioning European government bonds market is paramount both for the eurozone member states issuing these bonds to generate liquidity and the investors buying and trading them,” European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.

UBS said the fine related to “a legacy issue” and it had since taken action to improve its processes.

“Taking into account relevant provisions, this matter may have an impact of up to $100 million on UBS’s second quarter 2021 results,” it said.

UniCredit said the findings did not show any “wrongdoing on its part”.

“UniCredit will appeal the decision before the European Courts,” the Italian bank said in a statement.

Nomura said it had introduced measures to ensure “the highest levels of integrity at all times” and would consider all options, including an appeal.

“The decision issued today by the European Commission and associated fine imposed on Nomura relates to historic behaviour by two former Nomura employees for an approximate 10 month period in 2011,” it said.

The European Commission said Bank of America, RBS (now known as NatWest), Natixis and WestLB (now known as Portigon) also took part in the cartel.

NatWest escaped a 260-million-euro fine as it alerted the cartel to the EU competition watchdog. Bank of America and Natixis were also not fined because their infringement falls outside the limitation period for imposition of fines, the Commission said.

It said Portigon, the legal and economic successor to WestLB, received a zero fine as it did not generate any net turnover in the last business year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HODL your horses, cryptos face possible hurdles ahead, experts say, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Evolving rules, environmental concerns and competition from central banks threaten to undermine many of the world’s fast-growing crypto assets, crypto and macro experts said, while creating opportunities for those able to adapt.

Europe and the United States are both working on regulating digital assets and their providers – moves welcomed by investors, who hope the new ground rules will encourage institutional investors to plunge in.

Anatoly Crachilov, co-founder and CEO of Nickel Digital Asset Management, which manages assets worth $200 million, told the Reuters Global Markets Forum that regulatory uncertainty was a drag on the development of the crypto space.

He described the promise by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission‘s new Chairman Gary Gensler, to provide “guidance and clarity” to the market during his confirmation hearing in March, as a turning point.

For its part the European Commission‘s proposed “Markets in Crypto-assets,” or MiCA regulation, will regulate crypto-assets and their service providers in the European Union.

“It will be a new banking sector, with passporting possibilities,” digital asset trading solutions company H-Finance CEO Vytautas Zabulis said, referring to the prospect of EU-wide cryptocurrency trading licences.

Alongside the evolving regulatory framework, some countries, including China, Britain and Russia, are considering launching their own central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

That is likely to be followed by legislation to tax gains, said Robert Carnell, chief economist and head of research at ING Asia. “That may be the death knell for these other cryptocurrencies, though central bank coins are on the up and up,” he said.

Zabulis said that if CBDCs were developed in a way that they were “easy to interact with,” most digital currencies used for settlements will likely lose their both their goal and value.

There was not a big argument for bitcoin becoming a settlement tool, Zabulis cautioned. “Blockchain technology is for that, so, CBDCs will be built on blockchain.”

Bitcoin BTC=BTSP traded around $54,000 following a 10% surge on Monday, driven by reports that JPMorgan Chase JPM.N is planning to offer a managed bitcoin fund.

CBDCs are expected to have a limited impact on Bitcoin in particular, due to its progressively limited supply, which is in contrast to traditional fiat systems, Crachilov said.

“No central bank currency, however digital, can offer scarcity at this stage, as its supply can be inflated by a respective central bank issuing entity,” Crachilov said.

If China saw bitcoin as a threat to its own planned digital currency, that could affect the whole industry, Zabulis said.

GREEN REVOLUTION?
Creating crypto assets leaves a heavy carbon footprint, and is being increasingly seen as environmentally unsustainable.

ING Asia’s Carnell said there was “a strong argument on environmental grounds for limiting crypto mining, or at least having them offset their wasteful practices.”

However, bitcoin enthusiast Raoul Pal said he was not worried about the “unsustainability narrative”.

Pal, founder and CEO of on-demand financial TV channel Real Vision, said he believed it would drive a “green revolution” because in the end that was “the only way to win”.

Nickel Digital’s Crachilov said his fund was seeing a higher demand for ESG-compliant cryptos. “The price competition drives miners towards the cheapest sources of energy — renewables are increasingly falling into this category,” he said.

Ethereum 2 will use “proof of stake versus proof of work,” H-Finance’s Zabulis said. “It means that it will drastically reduce the energy needed” to mine it.

Garrett Minks, chief technology officer at Delaware-based RAIR Technologies, said the idea is to “trade brute force electricity burning with fancier math”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY