DHFL: RBI was never in favour of Wadhawan’s settlement offer

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The lenders of DHFL were surprised by the NCLT’s May 19 order, asking them to consider ousted promoter Kapil Wadhawan’s offer for the company.

By Ankur Mishra

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was never in favour of considering Kapil Wadhawan’s settlement offer for Dewan Housing Finance Corporation (DHFL). The regulator’s stance was made clear during RBI’s submission before the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on January 15, 2021. On Tuesday, the regulator’s submission was read by the counsel of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) at National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), where the lower court’s order was set aside.

RBI, in its submission at NCLT Mumbai on January 15, 2021, had said, “Affording the applicant (Kapil Wadhawan) even an opportunity of presenting a settlement offer may amount to permitting the applicant to take benefit of its own wrong, which lead to the complete downfall of DHFL and resultantly, the various stakeholders.”

The Reserve Bank’s stance is important as the regulator had referred DHFL for insolvency proceedings. DHFL is the first financial services firm to be sent to the bankruptcy tribunal after the government notified the rules for referring financial services providers (FSPs) on November 15, 2019. Unlike insolvency proceedings for companies from other sectors, an FSP creditor or debtor cannot approach the tribunal without being referred by a regulator.

The regulator also raised concern on the alleged serious offences by Wadhawans and said, “It is pertinent to mention herein that the applicant is the ex-promoter of DHFL against whom various proceedings, civil and / or criminal, have been filed, alleging cheating, fraud, siphoning of funds and such other serious offences. The applicant is presently in judicial custody and most regulatory agencies like CBI, EoW, ED etc. are at present investigating against the applicant. This being so, affording the applicant even an opportunity of presenting a purported settlement offer may amount to permitting the applicant to take benefit of its own wrong, which led to complete downfall of DHFL and resultantly, various stakeholders.”

The lenders of DHFL were surprised by the NCLT’s May 19 order, asking them to consider ousted promoter Kapil Wadhawan’s offer for the company. The order from the tribunal came as a surprise for lenders as they had already approved a bid of Rs 34,250 crore from Piramal Capital and Housing Finance (PCHFL) for the troubled mortgage lender. Wadhawan had earlier proposed a settlement plan of Rs 91,158 crore, claiming he would repay 100% of the principal to all the creditors. The settlement offer was rejected by the lenders in which he had proposed to repay lenders by selling his assets.

DHFL has been undergoing insolvency proceedings at NCLT in Mumbai since December 3, 2019. The troubled mortgage lender has admitted claims of `87,120 crore, with State Bank of India (SBI) being the lead creditor. While bondholders have claimed Rs 45,550 crore, financial creditors have sought Rs 41,342.23 crore from the mortgage financier.

Emails sent to RBI, DHFL administrator, and SBI did not elicit any response till the time of going to press.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks file application in NCLAT on DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Administrator and lenders to troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) have filed two applications in the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

These have been filed challenging the National Company Law Tribunal order which directed DHFL’s Committee of Creditors to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days.

Sources said that there are concerns that such a move will derail the resolution process of DHFL and could also set a bad precedent.

In his second settlement offer, Wadhawan had offered ₹91,158 crore, which is over ₹50,000 crore more than the ₹34,250 crore being offered by Piramal Enterprises Ltd.

The CoC, led by Union Bank of India, in its application has asked that the May 19 order of the NCLT should be set aside. Further the NCLT should also clear the resolution plan for DHFL.

DHFL Administrator R Subramaniakumar filed his application challenging the NCLT order on May 23.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lenders likely to move NCLAT over DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Lenders to troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) are looking at various options and are expected to file an appeal with the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Monday.

The move comes after the National Company Law Tribunal asked DHFL’s Committee of Creditors to consider the offer made by its former promoter Kapil Wadhawan within the next 10 days. In his second settlement offer, Wadhawan had offered ₹91,158 crore, which is over ₹50,000 crore more than the ₹34,250 crore is being offered by Piramal Enterprises.

Also read: Allowing Wadhawan to present settlement offer could derail DHFL resolution process: RBI

The Reserve Bank of India in its affidavit to the NCLT had said that permitting Wadhawan to make an offer for DHFL could derail the company’s resolution process. Bankers too are not in favour of such a move and have been left worried by the NCLT decision.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks eye sureties of ₹1.8-lakh cr

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Personal guarantees amounting to ₹1.8-lakh crore given by promoters of as many as 42 defaulting corporate entities could now be invoked by banks following the Supreme Court order.

This is likely to include Kapil and Dheeraj Wadhwan of DHFL (₹79,344 crore); Videocon promoters Venugopal and Rajkumar Dhoot (₹22,076 crore); Lanco Infratech’s Madhusudhan Rao and family (₹5,253 crore); IVRCL’s Sudhir Reddy (₹7,058 crore); and Jatin Mehta of Winsome Diamonds (₹6,185 crore), according to a PIL filed in the Supreme Court.

‘Concurrent proceedings’

Legal experts said that creditors can now initiate concurrent insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor and the personal guarantors. Abhay Itagi, Principal Associate at law firm MV Kini, said the personal guarantors, invariably promoters, shall be liable for their flawed decisions and hopefully appropriate provisions will be inserted for simultaneous insolvency proceedings against the promoter(s) and the company.

On November 15, 2019, the Government, through a Gazette notification, had made a new provision in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, giving banks the right to move an application for initiation of insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors to corporate debtors.

 

Promoters accountable

This was aimed at making promoters accountable for the defaulted loan because the recovery of debt by selling companies through the insolvency process has been low.

But the new provision was challenged by many promoters before different High Courts, claiming that promoters alone should not be held liable for the default on debt repayment.

Banking expert V Viswanathan said that the top court’s decision to uphold the Government’s notification will help banks recover more from stressed accounts. “There is a haircut whether through a resolution plan or liquidation. So, for the balance amount, the banks will now proceed against promoters.”

“Promoters who were not cooperating or trying to reduce the settlement amount by playing dirty tricks will come forward and help creditors get a better price realisation from the corporate assets (otherwise his personal assets will be attached for the balance amount),” Viswanathan said adding that the court ruling will also make promoters wary of extending personal guarantees unless they are confident of the business.

Faisal Sherwani, Partner, L&L Partners, said banks can invoke promoters guarantee even in cases where the company has been sold off under the IBC. This could spell trouble for former promoters of companies like Essar Steel and Bhushan Power.

Independent contract

“The liability of the personal debtor arises from an independent contract and the fate of the company would not ipso facto absolve the surety or personal guarantors,” Sherwani said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NCLT asks DHFL lenders to consider Wadhawan’s offer

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The resolution of scam-hit DHFL has taken a new twist, with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai, asking the company’s committee of creditors (CoC) to consider former Chairman & Managing Director Kapil Wadhawan’s resolution plan within next 10 days.

This comes even as the Tribunal is weighing DHFL (Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd) Administrator’s application on the resolution plan of Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited (PCHFL) as approved by the CoC.

The Administrator had filed the aforesaid application for NCLT’s approval on February 24, 2021, in the wake of receipt of “no objection” from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as per Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Insolvency and Liquidation Proceedings of Financial Service Providers and Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2019.

The CoC by majority voting approved the resolution plan submitted by PCHFLin January 2021 under section 30(4) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code

Bankers say since PCHFL’s resolution plan has been approved by majority of the lenders, it is unlikely that their decision will change.

Banks expect to receive initial proceeds from DHFL’s resolution from PCHFL, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Piramal Enterprises, in the second quarter.

Piramal Enterprises Ltd (PEL) said PCHFL has received fit and proper approval from the Reserve Bank of India on February 16, 2021 and approval from Competition Commission of India for the acquisition of DHFL on April 12, 2021.

“An application has been submitted to NCLT for the approval of the resolution plan. The implementation of the resolution plan is subject to the terms of the LOI (letter of intent) and other applicable regulatory approvals,” PEL said in a regulatory filing last week.

The claims of lenders admitted in NCLT in the case of DHFL aggregated to about ₹81,000 crore.

PEL, in its third quarter FY21 results, said that the total consideration for DHFL was ₹34,250 crore, which includes an upfront cash component of ₹14,700 crore (towards assets including the cash on DHFL’s balance sheet) and a deferred component (non-convertible debentures) of ₹19,550 crore.

Wadhawan’s proposal

Wadhawan, in a letter to DHFL Administrator and CoC, claimed that his proposal (made in December 2020) to CoC, provides for full repayment of the principal to all the creditors.

His proposal includes an upfront payment of Rs 9,000 crore in cash out of the free cash on the books of DHFL; Rs 31,000 crore to be paid within seven years in equal annual installments with 8.5 per cent interest.

Further, the aforementioned proposal also includes Rs 12,000 crore to be repaid within seven years in equal annual installments following a one-year moratorium with 11 per cent interest after two years of interest moratorium; and Rs 18,000 crore to be repaid within five years in equal annual installments following a five year moratorium with 11 per cent interest.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Piramal Retail Finance enters consumer & used car finance

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With a focus on retail lending, Piramal Retail Finance on Thursday announced its foray into consumer and used car finance, even as it expects the retail share of the lending book of the Piramal Group to increase to over 40 per cent with the merger of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) with Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd.

“The overall lending book is at about ₹45,000 crore, of which ₹5,000 crore or 11 per cent of the total lending book is from retail. DHFL book has got a substantial retail portion as well. By end of the fiscal year, retail share of the financial services business is likely to grow to mid-40s,” said Jairam Sridharan, Chief Executive Officer, Piramal Retail Finance.

focus on Non-mortgage products

In the medium term, it plans to grow the retail book to about two-thirds of the financial services business.

“With DHFL, though we have launched a lot of non-mortgage products, our business will become very mortgage heavy. We are keen to launch more non-mortgage products so that we can cross sell products to these consumers as and when the transaction happens,” Sridharan told reporters at a virtual press conference.

“The acquisition of DHFL fits perfectly into our overall retail strategy,” he said.

Earlier this week, the Competition Commission of India gave its nod to the acquisition of DHFL by PCHFL. Sridharan did not give a timeline for the expected approval from the National Company Law Tribunal but said the process is going as per expectations.

The Reserve Bank of India had in February this year approved the resolution plan for DHFL submitted by the Piramal Group.

Expansion plans

Meanwhile, elaborating on plans for Piramal Retail Finance, Sridharan said it aims to be one of the top five non-bank retail lenders over the next five years.

On Thursday, it announced the launch of its expanded multi-product retail financing platform. It is targeting ₹3,000 crore of new loan originations organically in next 12 months, in addition to inorganic growth.

Sridharan said the company, which plans to launch four more products this fiscal, is also looking at two wheeler financing and education financing in the next 12 months.

“We are working on a loans-against-shares product as well. We will also grow unsecured and multi-collateral lending products for small businesses,” he said.

At present, Piramal Retail offers seven products in its target markets –affordable housing loans, mass affluent housing loans, loans against property, secured small business loans, purchase finance, unsecured loans, and used-car loans. It is also looking to expand to 10 more locations in the next three months over the 40 locations it is already present in.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Piramal Capital and Housing Finance raises ₹4,050 crore through NCDs

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd (PCHFL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Piramal Enterprises Limited (PEL), has raised ₹4,050 crore through issuance of long-term, five-year non-convertible debentures (NCDs) in two tranches.

The first tranche of the NCD issue, amounting to ₹2,000 crore, opened on March 10 with a pay-in on March 12, 2021. The second tranche of the remaining ₹2,050 crore opened on March 18 with a pay-in on March 19, 2021.

“CARE Ratings has assigned an ‘AA’ rating for both the issuances,” the company said in a statement on Monday.

DHFL deal

The fund raise comes just weeks after the Reserve Bank of India gave PCHFL the approval to acquire troubled Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL). The total consideration for DHFL was ₹34,250 crore, comprising an upfront cash component of ₹14,700 crore and a deferred component of ₹19,550 crore.

“The five-year NCD issuances of ₹4,050 crore re-affirm the significant improvement of our liabilities side and strength of our balance sheet. We are now well-positioned to tap growth opportunities across both our financial services and pharma businesses,” said Rajesh Laddha, Executive Director, PEL.

The statement noted that PEL has transformed its liabilities profile towards more long-term borrowings and has raised over ₹50,000 crore since April 2019.

“It has raised over ₹32,000 crore of long-term borrowings since April 2019, while significantly reducing the Commercial Paper exposure from ₹18,017 crore in September 2018 to ₹1,050 crore as of December 2020,” it added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Ten reasons why banks are reluctant to lend to big corporate houses, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A few years back, big corporates were the cynosure of the banking sector and were given red carpet treatment while the small borrowers had to fret it out.

However, the ballooning of bad loans by big corporates and the opening up of other lending avenues have turned tables on India Inc.

Credit to industry contracted by 1.3 per cent in January 2021 as compared to 2.5 per cent growth in January 2020 mainly due to contraction in credit to large industries by 2.5 per cent (2.8 per cent growth in January 2020). The outstanding bank credit to large industries declined by Rs 59,610 crore on a year-on-year basis to Rs 22.78 lakh crore as on January 29, 2021, according to the latest RBI data.

So what makes banks shun large corporates?

1. The binding constraint for lending has not been liquidity or interest rates, but risk aversion by bankers, who have been burnt in episodes like DHFL, HDIL, where thousands of crores went kaput.

2. Indian banks are already saddled with one of the world’s worst bad-loan ratios, and are naturally reluctant to add to those risks.

3. Economic activity is still in the doldrums, though it is showing signs of improvement of late, which makes risk assessment difficult.

4. Fresh slippages in the December quarter have risen sequentially, with the top ten lenders by the size of their loan book, adding close to Rs 80,000 crore in slippages during the December quarter.

5. Banks have other avenues to lend. Disbursements under the emergency credit line guarantee scheme was at Rs 1.6 lakh crore, and banks deployed around at Rs 1.4 lakh crore through the targeted long-term repo operation and partial credit guarantee scheme, which served as credit substitutes. These credit is guaranteed by the government and less risky.

6. Fear of prosecution of bank officials if the credit decision goes wrong has also kept banks away from lending huge amounts to corporates.

7. Long gestation periods, the uncertainty of returns and cost overruns that saw fortunes of many top corporate houses dwindle is also keeping banks away.

8. Having burnt their fingers by lending astronomical amounts to large business groups, lenders such as YES Bank intend to stay away from large corporate businesses and rebuild loan book in the mid- and small-corporate segment.

9. Also, there are not enough opportunities as the corporate sector, which account for 49% of the overall bank credit, has put their capital expenditure plans on the back burner.

10. Success of the likes of HDFC Bank in building retail loans has drawn other banks to it. Retail loans are typically secured and risk is evenly spread.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

DHFL case: Leprosy Foundation files urgent application with Delhi HC, listed for Friday

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Sasakawa-India Leprosy Foundation, which has over ₹8 crore stuck in fixed deposits in Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL), has filed an urgent application in the Delhi High Court.

This comes soon after the Reserve Bank of India gave its approval to the resolution plan by Piramal Group for DHFL.

The matter is listed in the Delhi High Court for Friday.

 

The Foundation had earlier moved a plea in the Delhi High Court in January, soon after the Committee of Creditors had approved the resolution plan by Piramal.

FD holders of DHFL have been opposing the resolution plan as many of them would get a negligible amount of their investments back. According to the plan, FD holders of up to ₹2 lakh will get their full money back. But of those above ₹2 lakh, only 25 per cent of the money due will be paid.

The Foundation had made the RBI, National Housing Bank its representatives and Indian government as parties to the affidavit. The matter would be heard next on March 5.

Meanwhile, the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai has clubbed all petitions pending for dues in the DHFL resolution plan and has listed it for March 15.

“All petitions have been tagged together and will be considered as objection to the resolution plan,” said Vinay Kumar Mittal, a lead petitioner in the court on behalf of FD holders of DHFL.

Three separate petitions by Mittal, Army Group Insurance Fund and Uttar Pradesh State Power Sector Employees Trust and Board of Trustees of Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Contributory Provident Fund Trust were listed for hearing before NCLT, Mumbai on Thursday on DHFL resolution plan.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Auditor reports fresh ₹6,182-cr fraud in DHFL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A new fraudulent transaction of ₹6,182.11 crore has been unearthed in Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd, which is set to be acquired by the Piramal Group. The disclosure was made in a report by the non-banking finance company’s transaction auditor Grant Thornton.

Based on the report, the DHFL management has filed an application with NCLT, Mumbai, against 33, including Kapil Wadhawan, Dheeraj Wadhawan, Creatoz Builders, Ikshudip Fincap, Rite Developers and other entities. DHFL has been under an RBI administrator since 2019. The central bank had superseded the DHFL board, citing governance issues and payment defaults.

The latest disclosure will, however, have no impact on the ongoing debt resolution process. Last month, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd had emerged the successful bidder for the debt-laden DHFL and the RBI has also given its approval to the plan. The lenders are now set to seek approval from the NCLT.

DHFL owes ₹81,000 crore to state-run institutions, mutual funds and retail bond holders. The debt resolution process will help lenders recover about ₹35,000 crore.

Series of fraud deals

Since 2019, a number of fraudulent transactions have been discovered. Earlier this month, on February 4, DHFL had reported fraudulent deals of ₹5,559.05 crore that were unearthed by its transaction adviser.

In December 2020, a fraud of ₹1,058.32 crore was uncovered based on an additional report filed by Grant Thornton. Similarly, in September 2020, a forensic audit by the same auditor had unearthed fraudulent transactions of over ₹17,000 crore.

Fake accounts

A whopping 2.6 lakh fake accounts were created in a Mumbai branch that itself did not exist. The ‘branch’ created fake accounts using names of account holders who had already repaid loans in full to siphon off ₹11,750 crore. Coding was done with the help of three software platforms to camouflage these transactions, according to probe documents seen by BusinessLine.

The DHFL scrip closed 4.75 per cent lower at ₹18.05 apiece on the BSE on Monday.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5