Finance Ministry exploring insurance bonds as alternative to bank guarantees, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government is considering to introduce insurance bonds as an alternative to bank guarantees, Finance Secretary T V Somanathan said here on Tuesday. Somanathan made the announcement during a meeting between industry captains and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who is on a two-day visit to the financial capital.

“Government is exploring on instituting insurance bonds as alternatives to bank guarantees,” an official statement said.

Bank guarantees are usually asked for while extending a loan and typically require a collateral. An insurance bond is also a surety but it does not require any collateral.

As per reports last year, insurance regulator Irdai was also looking at the option of insurers offering surety bonds in the context of road projects.

Sitharaman, who met the industry captains in the evening, said the government is committed to working towards ensuring policy certainty, adding that the regulators also have a key role in ensuring the same.

She said the government is working with the regulators on this “important issue”, as per the statement.

The finance minister emphasised the importance of ‘India’s own equity capital’ while addressing the industry and assured government facilitation for sunrise sectors and startups.

Revenue Secretary Tarun Bajaj said his department was working on tax-related issues of startups and sought industry inputs on the same.

Sitharaman also assured the industry of addressing issues related to competitiveness, including high power tariffs, and matters related to cumbersome regulatory compliances, the statement said.

The economy is moving gradually from a bank-led lending model to a more market-based finance model and the operationalisation of the Development Finance Institution (DFI) will ensure long-term lending for projects, Sitharaman said.

The DFI will increase competition for banks and also improve their efficiency, the statement quoted her as saying.

In the meeting, which comes in the wake of a controversy caused by her cabinet colleague Piyush Goyal’s reported remarks about disenchantment with the industry for not keeping the nation’s interest in mind, Sitharaman said, “This government believes in listening, working and responding and would extend all possible support.”

Tata Steel’s T V Narendran said for growth to take deep roots, sustained demand is critical, and the immediate source of demand has to be government expenditure.

Narendran also recommended frontloading of the committed capital expenditure, especially on infrastructure, adding that the first quarter’s handsome revenues create a room for the same, as per the statement.

On the issue of arbitration awards being appealed, Somanathan said there is a need for a behaviourial change and added that the government trusts wealth creators.

The constraint on vaccination is on the supply side and the same is likely to be addressed soon, he further said.

Sitharaman met officials from income tax, Goods and Services Tax (GST) and customs departments in two separate meetings in what is her maiden visit to the financial capital since the second wave of COVID-19.

She is scheduled to address chiefs of state-run banks at a meeting on Wednesday.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reports, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Development Finance Institution (DFI) is expected to be set up with India Infrastructure Finance Company’s (IIFCL) paid-up capital of Rs 10,000 crore and an additional provision of Rs 10,000 crore announced in the Budget 2021, reported Business Standard.

As per the draft note, the Cabinet said that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Act and the Banking Regulation Act may be amended to set up the DFI for enabling it access to a line of credit, said BS. quoting sources.

“With an initial capital infusion of Rs 20,000 crore, the government or other investors may infuse up to Rs 1 trillion in the DFI at a later stage. The government’s part will come through the supplementary demand for grants.Prior to subsuming the infrastructure company with the DFI, it will clean up its books by providing for outstanding bad loans worth Rs 4,500 crore.”

It is also expected that the entity may have a lower minimum capital adequacy ratio of 9%, compared to 12-15% for NBFCs. The draft also proposes transfer of the assets and liabilities of IIFCL to National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID).

Post the transfer, IIFCL shall fully provide for all its outstanding bad assets, so that the new institution will have a clean book. It also said any additional requirement of money will be given through demand for grants subsequently, said BS.

Banks have been facing the challenge of an asset-liability mismatch in funding infrastructure projects or other projects with a long gestation period, and this gave the rise to the idea of setting up of a DFI, which will include access to low-cost funds from a priority-sector shortfall and greater headroom for borrowing, compared to other NBFCs.

Currently, there are some financial institutions — Indian Railway Finance Corporation, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, and the Small Industries Development Bank of India — are working like the DFI.

Meanwhile, the proposal is likely to get a nod from the Cabinet soon.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Governance structures, liability key to DFI success

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The experience of DFIs globally holds proof that the government needs to be involved in a hands-on fashion.

The assurance of sustainable sources of long-term liabilities and a strong governance framework will be crucial for the success of the proposed new development finance institution (DFI), industry participants and market experts said. The government will have to play a role not just as a provider of capital, but also as a facilitator of policy tweaks like credit enhancements for projects financed by the DFI. There is also speculation that India Infrastructure Finance Company (IIFCL) may be merged into the new sovereign-backed DFI.

Before 1992, DFIs enjoyed a set of benefits which made it easy for them to tap into long-term liabilities. They had access to funding at concessional rates from multilateral agencies. DFI bonds enjoyed a statutory liquidity ratio (SLR) status, which meant that banks were a captive source of funds for these institutions. They also received direct funding from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) through long-term operations (LTO).

Niranjan Rajadhyaksha, research director and senior fellow, IDFC Institute, said of these three routes, only the first still remains an option. “Maybe this DFI with some sovereign guarantee could raise money and then give rupee loans to local infrastructure companies. So we will have to await the details and see if the government comes up with a new rupee instrument to bridge the long-term liability gap,” he said.

Some industry executives believe that the pre-1992 concessions for DFIs may have to be brought back to make the structure effective. RK Bansal, who heads Edelweiss ARC and has earlier worked with IDBI, explained that if the older funding benefits are not restored, the bond market will have to be deepened significantly for DFIs to work.

“The government will also need to offer credit enhancement because new infra projects cannot be highly rated. Finally, a high degree of policy support will be required from the government and they must ensure that different departments coordinate among themselves to help complete the projects,” he said.

The experience of DFIs globally holds proof that the government needs to be involved in a hands-on fashion. Without policy-level handholding from the government, infrastructure projects cannot achieve fruition and it will be the DFI that will be left holding the can, experts said.

There is also a view that the new DFI must on-board private partners in order to establish a strong governance framework. Ashvin Parekh, managing partner, Ashvin Parekh Advisory Services (APAS), said, “Apart from raising long-term liabilities to fund long-term assets, the other challenge would be to develop a sound governance framework. That was what distinguished the better-managed private DFIs ICICI and HDFC from the others. If the government can conceive of some measure by which the DFI can raise long-term liabilities, then it could sustain with the help of good governance practices.”

Sound governance practices will also inspire confidence among potential long-term investors such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, Parekh added.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY