Family offices, HNIs latch on to cryptocurrencies as ride turns more volatile, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


It’s not just about small investors and millennials who are hoping on to the crypto bandwagon.

Serious investors, including family offices and high net worth individuals, are putting huge money as cryptocurrencies touch high levels.

Many investors in crypto hedge funds are either high net worth individuals (54%) or family offices (30%), according to Annual Global Crypto Hedge Fund Report 2021.

This comes as institutional investors are rotating out of cryptocurrencies and investing into gold. The recent crackdown by China has seen cryptocurrencies give up the gains of this year.

The median investment ticket size by family offices and HNIs is $0.4 million, while the average ticket size is $1.1 million.

The total assets under management of crypto hedge funds increased by 90% in 2020 globally, with the vast majority of investors in funds being either HNIs or family offices.

Personalised services

Cryptocurrency exchanges are tripping over each other to grab the high-value pie.

Crypto exchanges and funds have seen an uptick in investments of upwards of Rs 1 crore by family offices and wealthy individuals.

WazirX, India‘s largest crypto exchange by volume, recently created a dedicated over-the-counter team that executes high-value bulk trades to meet increased demand from high net-worth individuals. The platform has seen a 30x increase in user sign-ups by HNIs and family offices who trade over $25 million a month or want to buy crypto worth over $100,000. These funds get specialised services, including customised trading reports and support with taxation and compliance.

ZebPay, another crypto exchange, started offering OTC services last year. It offers “personalised service to institutions and individuals” looking to purchase a minimum of 5 bitcoins, which at current rates cost $150,000 or over Rs 1 crore. The exchange executes trades amounting to several million dollars every month.

Family offices

Family offices are also looking to diversify into crypto, mainly bitcoins. ZebPay wants to offer full-service wealth management for wealthy

clients to help build a diverse digital asset portfolio, including nonfungible token art collectibles.

Licensed advisers and wealth managers are shying away from offering formal guidance to clients in the absence of cryptocurrency regulations in India, which make it a legal grey area.

Most of the exchanges onboarding such clients are offering round-the-clock support, a dedicated relationship manager and personal involvement and guidance from top leadership at these exchanges.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Will equalisation levy spur growth of crypto exchanges in India?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Cryptocurrencies are likely to become slightly expensive for Indian investors buying the token from exchanges outside the country. The Income-Tax department is likely to levy an additional tax of 2% in the form of equalisation levy.

The tax department is now looking into whether the 2% levy is applicable on crypto assets bought online by Indians from overseas exchanges.

The government had expanded the scope of the equalisation levy from this year to include any purchase by an Indian or India-based entity through an overseas platform.

The levy is on the selling price and companies may be required to add this to the cost of the crypto assets.

Experts said there is no clarity as to whether cryptocurrencies can be categorised as goods, services or commodities.

Payback time

Since most cryptocurrency exchanges have not paid this levy, the taxman’s scrutiny now means that customers may have to pay up.

Unlike other taxes, equalisation levy is on the selling price, which would mean that the cost of buying the crypto assets will jump by 2% for Indians.

However, many crypto exchanges in the last few years have created structures where they do not have a presence or permanent establishment in India and the Indian entity only takes care of marketing functions.

Many companies have moved to Singapore or Dubai in a bid to safeguard themselves from some of the Indian laws in the last few years.

Permanent establishment is a concept in tax laws that determines which country has the first right to tax a company and to what extent.

Many companies have moved to Singapore or Dubai in a bid to safeguard themselves from some of the Indian laws in the last few years.
Many companies have moved to Singapore or Dubai in a bid to safeguard themselves from some of the Indian laws in the last few years.

Global interest

Global digital currency exchanges are exploring ways to set up in India, following in the footsteps of market leader Binance.

U.S.-based Kraken, British Virgin Islands-based Bitfinex and rival KuCoin are actively scouting the market,

The interest in cryptocurrency has exploded in India over the last 15 months as a bull run began in bitcoin and other virtual currencies.

India’s biggest crypto exchange WazirX along with other exchanges including CoinSwitch Kuber, Zebpay, CoinDCX has seen expotential growth in the last few months. In April, WazirX claimed it hit $5.4 billion in transaction volumes, which is a tenfold rise from $500 million in December 2020. Its user base shot up by 50% to 3 million in April, and in May, it saw crypto trades worth over $380 million on its platform on a single day. CoinSwitch Kuber raised $25 million at a $500 million valuation in April 2021.

ZebPay, India’s oldest exchange for trading cryptocurrencies, aims to double monthly transactions after an explosion in demand.

ZebPay, a platform with about 4 million customers, expects to churn $2 billion worth of trades per month, which is still less than one-fifth of trades handled by top US-based exchange Coinbase Global Inc.

While there is no exact number of cryptocurrency firms operating in India, estimated that at least 50 are actively onboarding customers and collectively processing transactions worth over Rs 15,000 crore annually.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bitcoin hits nearly 2-week low in wake of China crackdown, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


LONDON/TOKYO: Bitcoin tumbled as much as 9% on Monday as recent volatility in the cryptocurrency market showed no signs of dampening down, with market players citing thin liquidity and China’s expanding crackdown on bitcoin mining.

Bitcoin fell as low as $32,288, its lowest in 12 days, and was last down 7.5%. If sustained, the drop would be its biggest in around a month.

Authorities in the southwest province of Sichuan on Friday ordered cryptocurrency mining projects to close. The State Council, China’s cabinet, last month vowed to clamp down on bitcoin mining and trading as part of a series of measures to control financial risks.

“Crackdown on Chinese miners might mean that they are offloading coin into a thin market and taking us lower,” said Ben Sebley of London-based crypto firm BCB Group.

Production of bitcoin in China accounts for more than half of global bitcoin production. Sichuan is China’s second-biggest bitcoin mining province, according to data compiled by the University of Cambridge. Some miners shift production there in the rainy summer to take advantage of its rich hydropower resources.

Companies that mine bitcoin typically hold large inventories of the cryptocurrency, with any moves to sell large amounts depressing prices.

Bitcoin has dropped by over a fifth in the last six days, and is down by half from its April peak of just shy of $65,000. Still, it has gained over 10% this year.

Smaller rival ether, the second-biggest cryptocurrency by market capitalisation that tends to move in tandem with bitcoin, dropped as much as 12%, falling below $2,000 for the first time in almost a month. It was last down 10% at $2025.31.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Inside a ransomware attack: how dark webs of cybercriminals collaborate to pull one off

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


(The Conversation)

In their Carbis Bay communique, the G7 announced their intention to work together to tackle ransomware groups.

Days later, US President Joe Biden met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where an extradition process to bring Russian cybercriminals to justice in the US was discussed.

Also read: US has recovered ransom payment made after pipeline hack

Putin reportedly agreed in principle, but insisted that extradition be reciprocal. Time will tell if an extradition treaty can be reached. But if it is, who exactly should extradited – and what for? The problem for law enforcement is that ransomware – a form of malware used to steal organisations’ data and hold it to ransom – is a very slippery fish.

Not only is it a blended crime, including different offences across different bodies of law, but it’s also a crime that straddles the remit of different policing agencies and, in many cases, countries. And there is no one key offender. Ransomware attacks involve a distributed network of different cybercriminals, often unknown to each other to reduce the risk of arrest.

So it’s important to look at these attacks in detail to understand how the US and the G7 might go about tackling the increasing number of ransomware attacks we’ve seen during the pandemic, with at least 128 publicly disclosed incidents taking place globally in May 2021.

What we find when we connect the dots is a professional industry far removed from the organised crime playbook, which seemingly takes its inspiration straight from the pages of a business studies manual.

The ransomware industry is responsible for a huge amount of disruption in today’s world. Not only do these attacks have a crippling economic effect, costing billions of dollars in damage, but the stolen data acquired by attackers can continue to cascade down through the crime chain and fuel other cybercrimes.

Ransomware attacks are also changing. The criminal industry’s business model has shifted towards providing ransomware as a service. This means operators provide the malicious software, manage the extortion and payment systems and manage the reputation of the “brand”. But to reduce their exposure to the risk of arrest, they recruit affiliates on generous commissions to use their software to launch attacks.

This has resulted in an extensive distribution of criminal labour, where the people who own the malware are not necessarily the same as those who plan or execute ransomware attacks. To complicate things further, both are assisted in committing their crimes by services offered by the wider cybercrime ecosystem.

How do ransomware attacks work? There are several stages to a ransomware attack, which I have teased out after analysing over 4,000 attacks from between 2012 and 2021.

First, there’s the reconnaissance, where criminals identify potential victims and access points to their networks. This is followed by a hacker gaining “initial access”, using log-in credentials bought on the dark web or obtained through deception.

Once initial access is gained, attackers seek to escalate their access privileges, allowing them to search for key organisational data that will cause the victim the most pain when stolen and held to ransom. This is why hospital medical records and police records are often the target of ransomware attacks. This key data is then extracted and saved by criminals – all before any ransomware is installed and activated.

Next comes the victim organisation’s first sign that they’ve been attacked: the ransomware is deployed, locking organisations from their key data. The victim is quickly named and shamed via the ransomware gang’s leak website, located on the dark web. That “press release” may also feature threats to share stolen sensitive data, with the aim of frightening the victim into paying the ransom demand.

Successful ransomware attacks see the ransom paid in cryptocurrency, which is difficult to trace, and converted and laundered into fiat currency. Cybercriminals often invest the proceeds to enhance their capabilities – and to pay affiliates – so they don’t get caught.

The cybercrime ecosystem

While it’s feasible that a suitably skilled offender could perform each of the functions, it’s highly unlikely. To reduce the risk of being caught, offender groups tend to develop and master specialist skills for different stages of an attack. These groups benefit from this inter-dependency, as it offsets criminal liability at each stage.

And there are plenty of specialisations in the cybercrime underworld. There are spammers, who hire out spamware-as-a-service software that phishers, scammers, and fraudsters use to steal people’s credentials, and databrokers who trade these stolen details on the dark web.

Also read: Data breaches on the rise in 2021: Report

They might be purchased by “initial access brokers”, who specialise in gaining initial entry to computer systems before selling on those access details to would-be ransomware attackers. These attackers often engage with crimeware-as-a-service brokers, who hire out ransomware-as-a-service software as well as other malicious malware.

To coordinate these groups, darkmarketeers provide online markets where criminals can openly sell or trade services, usually via the Tor network on the dark web. Monetisers are there to launder cryptocurrency and turn it into fiat currency, while negotiators, representing both victim and offender, are hired to settle the ransom amount.

This ecosystem is constantly evolving. For example, a recent development has been the emergence of the “ransomware consultant”, who collects a fee for advising offenders at key stages of an attack.

Arresting offenders

Governments and law enforcement agencies appear to be ramping up their efforts to tackle ransomware offenders, following a year blighted by their continued attacks.

As the G7 met in Cornwall in June 2021, Ukrainian and South Korean police forces coordinated to arrest elements of the infamous CL0P ransomware gang. In the same week, Russian national Oleg Koshkin was convicted by a US court for running a malware encryption service that criminal groups use to perform cyberattacks without being detected by antivirus solutions.

While these developments are promising, ransomware attacks are a complex crime involving a distributed network of offenders. As the offenders have honed their methods, law enforcers and cybersecurity experts have tried to keep pace.

But the relative inflexibility of policing arrangements, and the lack of a key offender (Mr or Mrs Big) to arrest, may always keep them one step behind the cybercriminals – even if an extradition treaty is struck between the US and Russia.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

The tale of Cryptocurrency – still up in the air?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


After being out of favour for the past few years, cryptocurrency has seen a resurgence over the last year. Bitcoin, the poster child for the crypto movement, saw its value rise six times to ~ $ 63,000 by March 2021. Although it has sharply corrected post that it is still at four times the May 2020 levels. The primary reason for this has been the high participation, especially from retail players. This has been driven by the emergence of crypto exchanges like Coinbase, which went public April 2021 at a $100 billion valuation. Another key reason for its high value has been the scarcity; this is primarily because there is a limit set at 21 million bitcoins, and about 19 million of them has already been mined. Basis the success of Bitcoin, which has a current market cap of above $600 Billion, many more cryptocurrencies have emerged. Some of them, like Ethereum, Binance coin and tether, have a current market cap of more than $50 billion. So, what lead to the emergence of cryptocurrencies?

The cryptocurrency movement was driven by the distrust of the current financial system post the financial crisis of 2008. It was envisioned as a democratised currency created and owned by the people. The key to creating such a currency was a decentralised system where ownership is with everyone who participates. The trust this system created meant two parties not knowing each other could transact without needing an intermediary. It is this anonymous and decentralised nature that had the governments and central agencies concerned. Various governments had to impose restrictions on the use of cryptocurrency, owing to their increasing usage in illegal activities like money laundering, ransom payment, etc. This led to the fall in the value, post the initial enthusiasm. But globally, given the ease of launching a cryptocurrency and the interest, especially in the young, lead to multiple currencies being launched. There are more than 4000 cryptocurrencies globally, and they are still growing. While they might differ in their construct, the underlying volatility has been a feature of most of the cryptocurrencies launched, and therein lies the problem.

For any currency to act as a medium of exchange, the currency needs to be easy to carry, transact and should have a stable value over time. In the modern era, the primary role of central banks has been to provide this stability. Any drastic variation in the underlying value can lead to inflation or deflation, depending on the movement. While cryptocurrencies have been easy to transact and carry but the variability in their value and inability of a central agency to control it makes it a poor candidate to replace the current currency system. Widespread use of cryptocurrency can make the financial system vulnerable; this is especially true in developing countries where central banks ability to control inflation using monetary policy interventions can get severely impacted. Hence, we believe there is a very low probability that cryptocurrencies with their current construct can be seen as an alternate to the existing monetary system.

While cryptocurrencies have their drawbacks, having a digital currency is beneficial and hence many countries are looking to implement it. China has launched its digital currency. RBI has also been looking at creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC). The critical difference between these and existing cryptocurrencies is that they are expected to have a component of central control to help the central banks intervene and keep the value stable.

So what next for cryptocurrencies? While cryptocurrencies like bitcoin have not been able to serve their intended purpose of being a medium of exchange, they have emerged as an alternate asset class over the last few years. Given the limited availability and interest, especially among the millennials, their value is expected to increase. This has attracted significant capital flows towards this asset class. Given this, we believe the more prominent cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc. are here to stay. At what value? That seems to be a trillion-dollar question.

The blog has been authored by Nilaya Varma, CEO, Primus Partners and Shravan Shetty, MD, Primus Partners.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SEC delays ruling on Bitcoin ETF in blow to crypto traders, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


US regulators have once again punted their decision on whether to approve a Bitcoin ETF.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said in a Wednesday regulatory filing that it will seek more public comment on a proposal to list a product on Cboe Global Markets Inc. It’s not the first time this year that the SEC has delayed giving an answer to the legions of crypto advocates pushing for a way to trade the largest cryptocurrency in an exchange-traded fund format.

Crypto enthusiasts have long been frustrated by the agency’s reluctance to sign-off on a Bitcoin ETF, a product that could catapult the world’s most valuable digital token into the mainstream among institutional investors.

There were predictions earlier this year that the regulator would be more receptive under SEC Chair Gary Gensler, who once taught classes on digital assets at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. But since he took the reins in April, the agency has continued to express concerns that crypto exchanges lack oversight. And it has laid out fresh warnings about the risks of mutual funds investing in Bitcoin futures.

As part of Wednesday’s announcement, the SEC asked the public to weigh in on aspects of the Cboe proposal, which seeks approval of a VanEck Associates Corp. ETF. The SEC set deadlines into July and perhaps even August for people to respond. Here are some of the agency’s key questions:

  • Whether the trust and shares associated with the ETF would be susceptible to manipulation?
  • Whether Cboe’s plan is set up to prevent fraud and manipulation?
  • How transparent is Bitcoin?
  • Has regulation of the Bitcoin market changed substantially in the past five years?
  • What views do commentators have on the size and regulation of CME’s Bitcoin futures contracts?

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Millennials are killing it… Don’t LOL, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


– By Tarika Sethia

They are not just young but their choices are too unusual. While the traditional investors are still confused over cryptocurrency, millennials have already found solace in it.

Millennials investing in crypto

Vartika, a 28-year-old girl living in Mayur Vihar, Delhi, has seen hundreds of videos on YouTube which are related to cryptocurrency investments. She has invested in bitcoin and also made some money.

“I understood what cryptocurrency is by watching videos and decided to invest in it,” she said.

Around one crore investors are holding over $ 1 billion of cryptocurrency investments in India and the majority of them are millennials.

About 62% of users at WazirX, India’s biggest cryptocurrency exchange, are below 34 years of age. According to CoinDCX’s report titled ‘Mood of the Nation- 2020’, 71% of respondents below the age of 35 had invested in crypto at least once.

According to the CNBC Millionaire survey, more than 33% of millionaire investors belonging to the millennial generation have over half their wealth in cryptocurrencies. As mainstream and quotidian as it gets, it becomes essential to ask why some Indian millennials are throwing all their savings into a volatile virtual currency that they cannot afford to lose or is it just an alternate investment.

Cryptocurrency and Millennials

All these numbers shed light on the curious eyes of the millennial demography. The notion of crypto being a young person’s asset choice isn’t a farce. However, the question remains, why? While the equity markets were touching fresh lows each day during the Covid lockdown in 2020, cryptocurrencies kept rallying. It was 2020 when many began surfing the crypto wave. Work from home expanded the opportunity to do more than just work and allowed some free time to people leading to huge clamour for ‘meme’ stocks on social media. Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO) has made millennials dash for a chunk of the crypto pie.

Two things are attracting millennials towards cryptocurrencies. First, everything is digital and can be processed seamlessly on the smartphone. Second, it fetches high returns which no other asset class seems to offer.

“I have done my calculations. There are high chances that I will earn far more than what I invest,” said Syed, a 25-year-old intern in a private company.

Living in a digital world, convenience leaves millennials drooling. With copious platforms emerging for crypto trading and each one of them innovating to provide a better user experience, investing and trading has become easier. Brisk KYC to instant crypto purchases, investing in digital currency has become swift and seamless. It is the gift of having everything at your fingertip.

Millennials are not risk-averse

With skyrocketing growth and hard-hitting falls, cryptocurrencies are not for the risk-averse. Millennials are still young enough to afford risking a part of their investment into highly oscillating asset classes, as advised by financial advisors and influencers on Instagram and YouTube. This isn’t very fresh advice but has always lingered in the investment world. However, now it has welcomed a new asset class. This ideology served with the appeal of building wealth faster encourages this bracket to run towards crypto.

Cryptocurrency and regulations

Neither the government nor the regulator has taken any firm stand on cryptocurrencies yet. The crypto exchanges are trying their best to convince the regulator. While India’s central bank has clearly stated that they have issues against cryptocurrency, the Finance Ministry has a different view.

“We want to make sure there is a window available for all kinds of experiments which will have to take place in the crypto world. The world is moving fast with technology. We cannot pretend we don’t want it,” said, Nirmala Sitharaman, Finance Minister.

Cryptocurrency and Global Push
The virtual currency has been dancing over tweets and has even attracted eyeballs of governments from El Salvador to India.

The curiosity about crypto is all over the world. It reached a new high when Tesla founder Elon Musk joined the race. In fact, after a drastic fall, Bitcoin soared this week after Musk’s tweets again favour the crypto.

Moreover, the European Investment Bank (EIB) issued its first digital bond on the Ethereum blockchain, in April this year. Richard Teichmeister, the head of funding at the EIB called the blockchain technology “revolutionary”. Dogecoin that started as a meme currency shot up in value when the tech billionaire Elon Musk tweeted about it.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bitcoin still being called a bubble after May’s 35% crash, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Ksenia Galouchko

The view that Bitcoin is a hallmark of speculative excess and froth is still going strong, even after last month’s 35% plunge.

About 80% of fund managers surveyed by Bank of America Corp. called the market a bubble, up from 75% in May. The poll, which captures the view of 207 investors with $645 billion in assets, said “long Bitcoin” is the second-most crowded trade after commodities.

The results point to a skepticism among some professional managers about whether crypto is a viable asset class, given its extreme volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Bubble fears are nothing new for cryptocurrencies, and plenty of investors have voiced doubts over the wisdom of wading into an asset that has no fundamental underpinning.

Even though prices have tumbled, investment banks are still embracing the emerging asset class. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said it plans to roll out derivatives tied to Ethereum to clients, and Cowen Inc. plans to offer “institutional-grade” custody services for cryptocurrencies.

Prices also got a boost this week from veteran hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones, who reiterated his view that Bitcoin is a good hedge against inflation.

“I like Bitcoin as a portfolio diversifier,” Tudor Jones of Tudor Investment Corp. said in an interview with CNBC. “Everybody asks me what should I do with my Bitcoin? The only thing I know for certain, I want 5% in gold, 5% in Bitcoin, 5% in cash, 5% in commodities.”

Bitcoin still being called a bubble after May’s 35% crashOther highlights from survey, which was conducted June 4 to 10, include:

  • 72% of investors say inflation is transitory
  • 63% expect Federal Reserve to signal tapering in August-September
  • Inflation and bond market taper tantrum tied for the top tail risk
  • Allocation to bonds at three-year low (net -69%), while stocks back up to 2021 highs (61%)
  • Any equity market correction in the next six months likely to be less than 10%, according to 57% of investors
  • Managers favor a mix of value and tech stocks as best-performing assets in next four years
  • Allocation to Eurozone equities increased to net 41% overweight, highest since Jan. 2018
  • Allocation to U.S. equities remained at 6% overweight
  • Exposure to U.K. stocks increased to 4% overweight, highest since March 2014

–With assistance from Michael Msika.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

More US finance giants tiptoe into crypto assets, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW YORK: Investing in bitcoin and other digital currencies remains a risky game where the rules could change significantly, but the payoff could be big.

In response to this dilemma, several leading US financial heavyweights are staying on the sidelines, while an increasing number are proceeding cautiously into the growing world of crypto assets.

“My own personal advice to people: Stay away from it,” JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said recently, before adding, “That does not mean the clients don’t want it.”

JPMorgan, the biggest US bank by assets, is currently assessing how it can help clients transact in cryptocurrency, Dimon said last month at the bank’s annual meeting.

Formerly something of an investment sideshow dominated by computer geeks, cryptocurrencies are sparking greater interest among mainstream investors after a big jump in bitcoin prices in 2020 and early 2021.

On Thursday, the venerable giant State Street announced the creation of a new digital finance division.

On Wednesday, the head of online trading firm Interactive Brokers vowed to establish online trading of cryptocurrencies on the platform by the end of the summer.

Like its rivals Charles Schwab and Fidelity, Interactive Brokers does not now offer bitcoin trading on its platform, although it does give clients the option to invest in some assets that include cryptocurrencies or bitcoin futures.

Investors who want to trade bitcoin can currently turn to Robinhood or the cryptocurrency specialist Coinbase.

ForUsAll, a platform that manages retirement accounts for small businesses, on Monday announced an agreement with Coinbase that allows clients to invest up to five percent of their balances in cryptocurrencies.

Investment bank Morgan Stanley in March said it would allow wealthier clients to invest in bitcoin funds, while Goldman Sachs recently established a team dedicated to trading cryptocurrencies.

The chief executives of Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Bank of America said at a congressional hearing in late May that they are approaching the cryptocurrency landscape with caution.

Fidelity Investments, which established a digital assets division in 2018 to execute cryptocurrency trades for hedge funds and other institutional investors, filed papers with US securities regulators for a bitcoin exchange traded fund (ETF).

The move could potentially expand cryptocurrency investments to a broader range of individual investors.

Tougher rules ahead?
Still, many financial players are reluctant to dive into an investment realm associated with black markets that has sparked interest from US and global regulators.

There is also remarkable volatility, with bitcoin beginning 2021 at around $30,000 and hitting $63,000 in April before falling back to $34,000 in June.

“Speculators and those suffering from FOMO (the ‘fear of missing out’) will surely continue to flock to cryptos in the hopes of achieving huge returns,” said Ian Gendler of research firm Value Line.

But Gendler urges clients to avoid cryptocurrency investments, citing the elevated risk and the lack of a tangible asset compared with putting money into commodities or a company. Bitcoin and other digital money is also not backed by governments, he noted.

“Cryptocurrencies are only worth what the next investor is willing to pay,” he said.

Still, many in finance do not see cryptocurrency as a transient phenomenon.

“We do believe bitcoin, and more broadly crypto assets, are a new and emerging asset class that will likely be here to stay,” said Chris Kuiper, vice president at CFRA Research.

CFRA expects “the large banks as well as smaller financial institutions to continue to adopt them, particularly as the infrastructure and legal/regulatory framework continues to be built out,” Kuiper added.

The Basel Committee, which coordinates regulation among central banks, this week proposed new rules that would require banks to set aside capital for cryptocurrency investments.

Gary Gensler, the new head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has also said he wants to bolster protections for cryptocurrency investors, telling CNBC that such investors “don’t have full protections that they have in the equity markets or in the commodity futures market.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bitcoin ruling roils crypto world seeking regulatory clarity, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Vildana Hajric and Yakob Peterseil

International banking regulators’ decision to classify Bitcoin as the riskiest of assets dragged cryptocurrencies further into the mainstream financial world.

It also made it extremely costly for banks to hold digital tokens on their balance sheets, potentially delaying crypto’s wider adoption.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision proposed that a 1,250 per cent risk weight be applied to a bank’s exposure to Bitcoin and certain other cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin jumped on the announcement, then erased the gains. It was trading around $36,200 as of 10:30 a.m. in Hong Kong on Friday.

“The only consistency has been the volatility — it’s been big spikes, tons of enthusiasm, followed by big selloffs,” Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co., said of Bitcoin’s moves. “If you believe in it you’re probably to stomach the volatility, but if you’re just in it because it seems like the hot way to get a quick buck, that volatility is going to be hard to deal with.”

The ruling sparked a bevy of reactions across Wall Street and other financial centers worldwide. Here’s a sampling:

Luke Sully, CEO at treasury technology specialist Ledgermatic:
“It’s a piece of news that both advocates and critics of Bitcoin will declare as a win. It demonstrates that Bitcoin is now a recognized asset class with risk management parameters for the banks, but these same parameters could be a potential deterrent given the onerous capital requirements that may make it an unpalatable business,” he said. “There are a few underlying assumptions in this risk weighting, the most obvious being that the price may go to zero and investors could lose their full allocation. The capital requirements don’t protect the banks clients from transaction, settlement and FX volatility either.”

David Tawil, president of ProChain Capital, a crypto hedge fund:
To me, this whole thing, along with the IMF, is just a way for those entities to get involved in the conversation. In terms of putting these requirements it’s going to go ahead, and at least for now, take traditional banks that are traditional regulated by these regulatory entities essentially out of this game and that will allow for more and more alternative players, who are not regulated, to go ahead and to pull further ahead,” he said. “A regulator has very little upside and enormous downside — it’s like being a policeman. You want to protect people. So the furthest you can go in terms of lodging measures that stop activity, the better. And so, I think that they are for the first time inserting themselves. This certainly does not mean the end of cryptocurrency, the end of Bitcoin.”

Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Global Forex:
“I don’t think these things are good or bad themselves — it depends on what the objective is,” he said. “It’s not decentralized, it’s highly concentrated. Crypto was born in an age in which we had very extreme disparities of wealth and income — how can it not reflect that? The bulk of Bitcoin that’s owned by wallets have more than 100 Bitcoins, that’s more than $300,000 — how many Americans have $300,000 to put into crypto as opposed to retirement money?”

Matt Maley, chief market strategist for Miller Tabak + Co.:
“Obviously tougher capital requirements cause banks to have more capital on hand — that can have an impact on their earnings. The committee is saying because of risks involved — cryptocurrencies are very volatile — you have to have more capital on hand to protect against declines,” he said. “If it’s going to cost banks more to hold these cryptocurrencies on their books, they’re theoretically going to be less likely to hold the same kind of size as they otherwise would.”

Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said in a Bloomberg TV interview with Matt Miller:
“It is getting hammered, but you know what? It’s getting treated like any other higher-risk asset like subprime loans, or CDOs, or derivatives, or structured products. And it is a new product. It’s untested through economic cycles. It’s untested through liquidity.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 9 10 11 12 13 16