Legal threat for India’s data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted ads, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Happy Friday! Big Tech firms are up in arms against some provisions of the Personal Data Protection Bill. The biggest bone of contention has been the proposal to classify social media platforms as publishers. Companies are mulling legal action if lawmakers accept all the recommendations of the Joint Committee of Parliament in the final legislation.

Also in this letter

Tech firms may go to court over data protection bill

Top technology and internet companies may go to court to challenge certain provisions in the data protection bill if lawmakers accept and adopt all the recommendations of the Joint Committee of Parliament (JCP) in the final legislation, sources told us.

  • The Joint Committee on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 – headed by BJP Member of Parliament PP Chaudhary – adopted a draft report on November 22 with seven of its 31 members moving dissent notes against various clauses.

Why now? The biggest point of contention is the proposal to classify social media platforms as publishers as it places the onus for user generated content on internet companies and will impact a host of global majors including Facebook, Google’s YouTube, Twitter and WhatsApp, all of whom stand to lose the safe harbor or immunity currently provided by Information Technology Act, 2000, the sources said.

Quote: “Any new concept of privacy introduced as an amendment should be based on consensus approach, and is therefore important that all stakeholders, including key industry bodies, are engaged before a robust data protection legislation is put in place by the government,” said Kumar Deep, country manager, India, ITI Information Technology Industry Council, which counts companies Intel, Amazon, and Apple as its members.

Other clauses such as the inclusion of non-personal data in the privacy law as well as provisions for certifying hardware devices and the demand that sensitive personal data and critical personal data be stored locally, are also stoking concern, sources said.

What are experts saying? Privacy experts said the clause that classifies social media platforms as publishers is worrying for companies like Facebook and Google as it may directly impact their business model.

Civil society could also go to court over sweeping exemptions granted to government and law enforcement agencies in the recommendations made by the committee, according to public policy expert Prasanto K Roy.
Cryptocurrency exchanges eye targeted ads
Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted ads
Cryptocurrency exchanges are turning to targeted advertising and marketing campaigns to soothe the nerves of investors who are exiting their investments amid regulatory uncertainty on the virtual currencies.

What’s happening? Some of the exchanges, including CoinDCX and CoinSwitch Kuber, have re-started advertising and marketing campaigns, albeit not as aggressively as earlier, industry insiders said. In most cases, the advertisements are aired on social media and other digital platforms.

According to a person part of the Blockchain and Crypto Assets Council, an industry advisory body, several exchanges wanted to restart advertising, especially targeting their existing investors. Some of them are looking to roll out advertisements across platforms in the coming week as they hope to get some clarity on the legality of crypto assets.

Last month, we reported that several crypto exchanges in India have decided to refrain from launching fresh advertisements on print, television and radio.

Financial and legal experts had sounded an alarm over some of the advertisements by crypto companies that are towing a fine line between “puffery” and “misrepresentation”.

In October, the Advertising Standards Council of India chairman Subhash Kamath told us that celebrities must do their due diligence before endorsing cryptocurrency companies as they could be held accountable for misleading claims.

Why is it significant? Indian cryptocurrency exchanges are estimated to have collectively spent more than Rs 50 crore during the recently concluded ICC T20 World Cup, ET reported last month.

Tweet of the day

Paytm founder to start PMS scheme
Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted adsPaytm founder Vijay Shekhar Sharma

Paytm founder Vijay Shekar Sharma is starting a Portfolio Management Scheme (PMS) in an alliance with PMS Bazaar, a Mumbai-based startup that would devise investment strategies.

What’s the plan? It will primarily focus on equities, with 95% of the funds invested in large, mid and small cap companies. Besides, gold, exchange traded funds and debt are other asset classes.

Quote: “At Paytm Money, we have leveraged technology to make investing & trading efficient and transparent,” said Varun Sridhar, CEO, Paytm Money. “Extending the same to HNI investors, we have partnered PMS Bazaar to launch PMS Marketplace, offering a one-stop shop.”

Meanwhile, Paytm has received the first buy rating from a brokerage that expects the company to turn profitable by March 2026

Brokerage’s view:
Dolat Capital Market Pvt, the third brokerage to initiate coverage on the digital payments giant after Macquarie Capital Securities and JM Financial Institutional Securities Ltd., said its transition to a “manufacturer” of financial services from an agent, cross-selling of services, and strong growth in the number of users will help the company.

Paytm’s “super app” has emerged from a pure “want” category to reach to the “need” status, Dolat analysts, led by Rahul Jain, said.

On the Street:
The brokerage has set a target price of Rs 2,500, which is 16% higher than the company’s issue price. Paytm dropped as much as 2.7% to Rs 1,592 on Thursday, the fifth day of declines, after plummeting 37% in the first two sessions of trading. JM Financial has a sell rating on the stock, while Macquarie has rated it as underperform.

By the numbers:
In its first earnings report since going public earlier this month, Paytm said expenses rose 37.1% year-on-year to Rs 1,599 crore and consolidated net loss increased to Rs 474 crore from Rs 437 crore a year ago. Revenue from operations surged 63.6% to Rs 1,086 crore for the quarter ended September.
Swiggy to invest $700 million in quick commerce biz
Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted adsSriharsha Majety, cofounder and CEO, Swiggy

Swiggy has earmarked $700 million for its Instamart service, amid heightened investor interest and growing competition in the instant grocery delivery segment, cofounder and chief executive Sriharsha Majety said.

Instamart, launched in August last year as Swiggy’s quick commerce vertical, is set to reach an annualised GMV run rate of $1 billion in the next three quarters, the company said. Gross merchandise value, or GMV, is a key online retailing metric for the total value of merchandise sold through a marketplace.

There is, however, no set time frame for the deployment of the cash as it is an overall commitment to the category, Majety told us.

  • “It is not a dated commitment where we are going to deploy this in the next 12 months or 18 months. We think that is the size of ammunition that we need to deploy to be able to do justice to this category,” he said.

Tell me more: Swiggy’s large capital commitment for Instamart comes on the back of the Bengaluru-based company holding talks to close a $600-700 million funding round led by US asset manager Invesco, we reported first on Sept. 28. The fundraising, which is likely to ascribe the firm a valuation of over $10 billion, is part of a re-rating exercise that will double the company’s valuation post rival Zomato’s bumper IPO.

Quote: “It is an exciting category and our commitment to invest is also a function of that. Every time there is a new category that is starting to explode or open up—whether globally or locally— there’s always going to be interest and there will be some funding happening along the way,” Majety said about the flood of investments in the ultra-fast delivery space.

The competition: The delivery platform, which competes with Zomato-backed Grofers, Mumbai-based Zepto and Tata’s BigBasket in the quick commerce category, is clocking more than one million grocery orders per week and runs 150 dark stores across 18 cities. It will add 100 more of these so-called dark stores, over the next few months.

Grofers, which is likely to receive $500 million capital from Zomato, operates a network of 200 dark stores to which it plans to add another 100, the company had announced in a blog post in November. Zepto, a pure-play quick commerce platform that recently raised $60 million, is targeting 100 dark stores by the year-end.

Quick delivery push: Zomato’s move to double down on the fast-growing quick delivery segment comes on the back of rival Swiggy prioritising Instamart.

Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted ads
Food delivery remains the focus: Even as Swiggy pushed ahead aggressively on the grocery delivery front, the company’s food-delivery business hit a $3 billion annualised GMV run rate, a lifetime high for the category, Majety told us. The company’s food delivery volumes have surpassed pre-pandemic level, he said, without getting into the specifics.
Flipkart merges its customer and marketing departments
Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted ads
Walmart owned online retail giant Flipkart is merging its customer and marketing departments with growth and monetisation, all of which will be headed by senior Flipkart executive Prakash Sikaria, according to an internal company email sent by CEO Kalyan Krishnamurthy.

The changes are effective from January 1, 2022, according to the email, reviewed by ET.

Sikaria is also scaling Flipkart’s social commerce business Shopsy which is taking on SoftBank-backed Meesho.

Flipkart launched Shopsy in July and has seen a four times revenue growth during this festive period, compared to non-festive period, the company had said in a statement last week. Flipkart’s travel business Cleartip, which appointed a new CEO in former Myntra executive Ayyappan R, will also report to Sikaria.

Also Read: Flipkart’s Nandita Sinha appointed as new Myntra CEO
8i Ventures aims to raise larger second fund at $50 million
Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted ads8i Ventures partners

Mumbai-based 8i Ventures is looking to raise a $50-million Fund-II, almost four times larger than its previous corpus, as the seed-stage investor looks to double down on its investments across commerce and fintech.

Portfolio: Founded in 2019 by entrepreneur and angel investor Vikram Chachra along with Vishwanath V, 8i Ventures has backed seven early-stage startups from its maiden $13-million Fund-I.

The firm’s fintech bets like Slice, a credit-card issuing startup; M2P, a card-issuing platform; and Difenz, a digital risk and fraud management firm, have performed well. In fact, last week, Slice said it had raised $220 million from Tiger Global and Insight Partners, among others, as its valuation topped $1 billion. 8i Ventures first invested in Slice earlier this year, when it was valued at $200 million and is sitting on a 7.4X paper gain clocked in less than six months of its investment.

Legal threat for India's data law; crypto exchanges eye targeted ads
The firm has also backed consumer brands like Blue Tokai Coffee and Bbetter, an Indian supplements brand.

Quote: “8i’s Fund-I is clocking a multiple of 4.2 times on the capital we have drawn down, and 5.6 times on the investments we have made from the fund, over the last two years…We raised our fund in 2020-21 and expect to return around 25% of the fund assets under management by the end of FY22. We should be able to return the entire fund by FY23,” Chachra told us

Investment trend: Majority of the investments made by the fund is in the range of $1-$1.5 million in the seed stages, as well as through follow-on investments in Series A and B rounds.

With the new fund, the VC expects the cheque sizes to go up to $5 million, depending on the growth stage and maturity of the companies.
Other Top Stories By Our Reporters
Parliamentary panel suggests selectively banning WhatsApp, Facebook: The government should explore selectively blocking Facebook, WhatsApp, and Telegram instead of a blanket shutdown of the internet, a parliamentary panel studying internet bans in India has suggested. The Standing Committee on Communications and IT, headed by senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, tabled a report on the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Service) Rules, 2017 on Wednesday.

Freshworks loses $5.45 billion in market cap in one month: Nasdaq-listed Freshworks Inc, which briefly toppled Zendesk Inc in terms of market capitalisation about a month ago, has since slipped by nearly 30%. The poster child of Indian software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies hit an intraday high of $53.35 per share on November 2, valuing it at $13.56 billion, about $1.4 billion more than Zendesk’s $12.1 billion.
Global Picks We Are Reading

  • Who is Parag Agrawal, Twitter’s new CEO? (NYT)
  • Uber adds ride booking via WhatsApp in India (Bloomberg)
  • Donald Trump’s social media venture seeks to raise $1 billion (Reuters)



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Crypto exchanges launch crypto gift cards

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Amidst rising investor interest, cryptocurrency exchanges have launched crypto gift cards as an alternative to traditional gifts like sweets given on Diwali and other festive occassions.

Bitbns has launched exclusive crypto gift cards.

“These gift cards will be available in multiple cryptocurrency options like Bitcoin, Ethereum and many more,” it said in a statement.

Starting on November 4, anyone can avail of the benefits of the crypto gift cards irrespective of whether they invest or trade in cryptocurrency, it said.

CrossTower

Similarly, CrossTower has also introduced an e-gift card feature that allows its users to gift cryptocurrencies of their choice to friends and families.

“Indian users can create a personalised gift card by adding their preferred cryptocurrency from CrossTower wallet, to generate a unique card ready for sharing,” it said.

Users receiving the e-gift card can redeem it at the CrossTower India App (Application) by sharing the voucher link in the ‘Redeem’ section, after registering with the platform. The cryptocurrency will be automatically updated in their CrossTower wallet.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Crypto users see the light at the end of the tunnel

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banking troubles for crypto enthusiasts and investors in the country seem to have abated to some extent with at least a handful of banks permitting such transactions.

According to cryptocurrency exchange owners, there has been some easing in the stance by banks towards crypto transactions in the last three to four months. Smaller private sector banks as well as a few public sector banks are understood to be now permitting these transactions.

“Till three to four months ago, there were problems but the situation in terms of banking is now under control. All options are fully functional and one can do INR deposits through bank accounts,” said Sumit Gupta, co-founder and CEO, CoinDCX.

Also see: Millennials pull crypto out of the shadows

In an interaction with BusinessLine, he said that members of CoinDCX are not facing any banking related problems.

“Banks also have a reasonable understanding of cryptocurrency now. The progress on bank front is very encouraging. Smaller banks are opening up to crypto to get a larger market share,” Gupta said.

Relaxed positions

Another crypto exchange owner said that the position varies from bank to bank but it has significantly relaxed from the blanket ban towards cryptocurrency transactions that was seen earlier in the year.

Also see: Bitcoin hovers near 6-month high on ETF hopes, inflation worries

“It is not as if the industry doesn’t have any problem with banks. In most cases users are not facing the kind of problems they had earlier when they wanted to transact for crypto investments,” he said, adding that banks are no longer blocking accounts of crypto investors or warning of action.

Payment gateways

Apart from banks, crypto investors also have the option to use payment gateways and UPI, both of which are working well, industry experts said.

“Payment gateways are largely used by investors. Multiple payment gateways are working and plan to continue working with crypto,” Gupta said.

Regulatory uncertainty

The lack of regulatory certainty continues to be a challenge to some extent but there is now more of an understanding towards the sector.

With growing investor interest in cryptocurrency, a number of banks had earlier this year warned users about virtual currency transactions, citing the Reserve Bank of India’s 2018 circular.

However, the RBI had on May 31 asked regulated entities to not cite its April 2018 circular on “Prohibition on dealing in Virtual Currencies” as it is no longer valid following the Supreme Court ruling.

Also see: More than 2 lakh crypto accounts blocked in India over 6 months

It had also asked them to continue to carry out customer due diligence processes in line with regulations governing standards for Know Your Customer, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT) and obligations of regulated entities under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

However, a banker noted that it still depends on the judgment of individual banks and how they wish to proceed on the issue.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What’s new in China’s crackdown on crypto?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


China‘s most powerful regulators have intensified the country’s crackdown on cryptocurrencies with a blanket ban on all crypto transactions and crypto mining.

The move sent bitcoin and other major coins lower, as well as pressurising crypto and blockchain-related stocks.

What’s new?

Ten Chinese agencies, including the central bank and banking, securities and foreign exchange regulators, have vowed to work together to root out “illegal” cryptocurrency activity.

While China has been putting in place increasingly stricter rules on virtual currencies, it has now made all activities related to them illegal and sent a signal of intent they plan to get even tougher on enforcing the rules.

China’s central People’s Bank of China (PBoC) said it was illegal to facilitate cryptocurrency trading and that it planned to severely punish anyone doing so, including those working for overseas platforms from within China.

The National Development and Reform Council (NDRC) said it would launch a nationwide crackdown on cryptocurrency mining as it tries to phase the sector out entirely.

What’s come before?

China does not recognise cryptocurrencies as legal tender and the banking system does not accept cryptocurrencies or provide relevant services.

In 2013, the government defined bitcoin as a virtual commodity and said individuals were allowed to freely participate in its online trade.

However, later that year, financial regulators, including the PBoC, banned banks and payment companies from providing bitcoin-related services.

In September 2017, China banned initial coin offerings (ICOs) in a bid to protect investors and curb financial risks.

The ICO rules also banned cryptocurrency trading platforms from converting legal tender into cryptocurrencies and vice versa.

The restrictions prompted most such trading platforms to shut down with many moving offshore.

The ICO rules also barred financial firms and payment companies from providing services for ICOs and cryptocurrencies, including account openings, registration, trading, clearing and liquidation services.

By July 2018, 88 virtual currency trading platforms and 85 ICO platforms had withdrawn from the market, the PBOC said.

Why does it keep tightening the rules?

The huge run-up in price in bitcoin and other coins over the past year has revived cryptocurrency trading in China, with investors finding ways round the existing regulations. That’s come as the country is trying to develop its own official digital currency, becoming the first major economy to do so.

Earlier this year, Chinese regulators tightened restrictions that banned financial institutions and payment companies from providing services related to cryptocurrency. An industry directive said that speculative bitcoin trading had rebounded and was infringing “the safety of people’s property and disrupting the normal economic and financial order”.

Many Chinese investors were now trading on platforms owned by Chinese exchanges that had relocated overseas, including Huobi and OKEx. Meanwhile, China’s over-the-counter market for cryptocurrencies has become busy again, while once-dormant trading chartrooms on social media have revived.

China-focused exchanges, which also include Binance and MXC, allow Chinese individuals to open accounts online, a process that takes just a few minutes. They also facilitate peer-to-peer deals in OTC markets that help convert Chinese yuan into cryptocurrencies.

Such transactions are made through banks, or online payment channels such as Alipay or WeChat Pay, though these have since promised to conduct due diligence on clients and set up monitoring systems targeting key websites and accounts to detect illegal crypto-related transactions.

Retail investors also buy “computing power” from cryptocurrency miners, who design various investment schemes that promise quick and fat returns.

What’s the impact of the crackdown?

While cryptocurrencies fell on Friday, the fall was less pronounced than the slide seen in May when China’s State Council, or cabinet, vowed to crack down on bitcoin mining.

The test will be whether China is able to find and punish platforms and people breaking the rules.

Some analysts said that based on what’s gone before, determined investors would still likely find a way to trade.

“While retail traders in China may no longer be able to access online exchange platforms that are now illegal, crypto funds may be able to move management of their funds offshore,” said Ganesh Viswanath Natraj, Assistant Professor of Finance at Warwick Business School.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Over 60 South Korean crypto exchanges set to suspend services next week, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SEOUL: More than 60 cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea must notify customers of a partial or full suspension of trading by Friday midnight, a week before a new regulation comes into effect.

To continue operating, exchanges must register with the Financial Intelligence Unit by Sept. 24, providing a security certificate from the internet security agency. They must also partner with banks to ensure real-name accounts.

Exchanges that have not registered must shut down services after Sept. 24, while those that have registered but failed to secure partnerships with banks will be prohibited from trading in won.

“Should some or all services need to be closed, (exchanges) should notify customers of the expected closing date and procedures to withdraw money by at least seven days before the closure,” the Financial Services Commision said earlier this week. It said this should be completed no later than Sept. 17.

Of all exchanges, nearly 40 are set to suspend all services. A further 28 have security certificates but have not secured bank partnerships.

Just four – Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone and Korbit – have registered and secured partnerships and so will be allowed to make won settlements.

Some smaller exchanges including ProBit, Cashierest and Flybit have already said they will end won trading, and that they will continue operations involving only digital coin trading until securing partnerships with banks.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Decentralised finance, the latest front in crypto’s hacking problem, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


London: For most of the 13-year life of cryptocurrencies, exchanges were the epicentre for cyberheists. Now, a bigger hacking risk in the growing sector has exploded into view: peer-to-peer crypto platforms.

One such site, Poly Network, was at the centre of a $610 million crypto theft last week, one of the biggest ever. Within days of the heist, the decentralised finance (DeFi) platform said the “white hat” hacker or hackers had returned nearly all the loot.

The unusual ending to the Poly Network saga belies fast-emerging risks in this growing corner of crypto, where an estimated $80 billion or more is held, interviews with industry executives, lawyers and analysts show.

DeFi sites allow users to lend, borrow and save—usually in cryptocurrencies—while bypassing traditional gatekeepers of finance such as banks and exchanges. Backers say the technology offers cheaper and more efficient access to financial services.

But the heist at Poly Network—previously a little-known site—has underscored the vulnerability of DeFi sites to crime. Would-be robbers are often able to exploit bugs in the open-source code used by sites. And with regulation still patchy, there is usually little or no recourse for victims. Centralised exchanges, which act as middlemen between buyers and sellers of cryptocurrencies, had previously been the main targets of crypto cyberheists.

Tokyo-based exchange Mt.Gox for instance collapsed in 2014 after it lost half a billion dollars in hacks. Coincheck, also based in Tokyo, was hit by a $530 million heist in 2018.

Many major exchanges, under the regulatory spotlight and striving to attract mainstream investors, have since bolstered security and heists on such scale are now relatively rare.

Less Secure
An onus on security at major platforms such as Coinbase Global Inc. has pushed less-secure venues to the sidelines, said Ross Middleton, chief financial officer at DeFi platform DeversiFi.

“What’s happened is the big exchanges have got really good (on security) and the smaller exchanges aren’t around anymore,” he said. “The frontier is definitely DeFi now.”

Losses from crime at DeFi platforms are at an all-time high, crypto intelligence firm CipherTrace said last week, with thieves, hackers and fraudsters making off with $474 million from January through July.

The spike came as funds poured into DeFi, mirroring flows into crypto as a whole. According to DeFi Pulse the total value held at such sites is now more than $80 billion, compared with just $6 billion a year earlier.

DeFi specialists say security risks tend to lie at newer sites which may run on less secure code.

“There is a widening security and risk gap between old, battle-tested DeFi protocols, and new, untested DeFi protocols,” said Rune Christensen, former head of the body behind high-profile DeFi application Maker.

Proponents says the use of open-source code means vulnerabilities can be quickly identified and solved by users, reducing the risk of crime. DeFi can police itself, they say.

Yet for financial watchdogs and governments across the world looking at regulating the crypto sector, DeFi is increasingly in focus.

Enforcement Action
US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chair Gary Gensler has signalled he would take a tough stance on DeFi. Such platforms may be captured by US securities laws, he said in a speech this month, calling on Congress to draft legislation to rein in DeFi and crypto trading.

The SEC this month brought its first enforcement action involving DeFi tech, alleging the company issued unregistered securities and misled investors. The SEC did not respond to further questions on its stance.

Officials at the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission have also signalled greater scrutiny.

Commissioner Dan Berkovitz in June called DeFi a “Hobbesian marketplace”—a reference to a 17th century philosopher who saw life without government as “nasty, brutish and short”. Unlicensed DeFi platforms for derivatives were violating commodities trading laws, he suggested.

Elsewhere, moves are slower. DeFi is still far from the political agenda in Britain, for instance.

A spokesperson for Britain’s financial watchdog said while some DeFi activities may fall under its scope, much of the sector is unregulated.

For some analysts, greater regulation in inevitable, with little sign that DeFi sites can do the job themselves. “The unfortunate situation is that (Poly Network) was seen as just an average Tuesday in the DeFi world,” said Tim Swanson of blockchain firm Clearmatics. “The industry likes to congratulate itself by claiming it resides on transparent systems, but it has repeatedly shown it is incapable of policing itself.”

Reuters’ Michelle Price in Washington and Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss in New York contributed to this story.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Now, Indian crypto exchanges hit by payment processors pullout, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Just as they were breathing easy with the Reserve Bank of India clarifying that banks can do due diligence of crypto clients, Indian crypto exchanges have been hit by another hurdle.

With the RBI reiterating that it does not favour cryptocurrencies, major payment gateways have pulled out hitting transactions.

Customer complaints have inundated all India’s key exchanges as the pullout by major payment gateways, including Razorpay, PayU and BillDesk has hit transactions, according to social media and users.

The options

Options being resorted to including tying up with smaller payment gateways, building their own payment processors, holding back on immediate settlements or offering only peer-to-peer transactions.

At least two exchanges have tied up with smaller payment processing firm, Airpay, as its larger peers have cut ties.

Some crypto exchanges, such as WazirX, are forced to stick only to peer-to-peer transactions on certain days, while others, such as Vauld, allow bank transfers with manual settlement as they hunt for a payment processor, backing up settlements.

Smaller payment gateways have not proved very successful in executing high volumes of transactions, leading to failures that have resulted in a flood of user complaints.

Others, such as Bitbns, have built their own basic payment processor, allowing some essential transactions since the systems do not require prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India, the central bank.

A grey area

Despite the boom, cryptocurrencies are in a grey area in India, with the Reserve Bank hostile towards it and the government unsure about its prospects.

There is no legislation or regulatory code yet to govern the crypto ecosystem, leading to confusion among customers, businesses and financial institutions providing banking services.

In 2018, the Reserve Bank of India barred financial institutions from supporting crypto transactions, which the Supreme Court overturned in 2020. The government has circulated a draft bill outlawing all cryptocurrency activities, which has been under discussion since 2019.

Last month, the RBI asked banks not to cite its 2018 circular and clarified that banks can do their own KYC for crypto clients. With this, banks are now reassessing the situation, but several banks currently lack the technical expertise to make a supervisory assessment on these transactions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Will equalisation levy spur growth of crypto exchanges in India?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Cryptocurrencies are likely to become slightly expensive for Indian investors buying the token from exchanges outside the country. The Income-Tax department is likely to levy an additional tax of 2% in the form of equalisation levy.

The tax department is now looking into whether the 2% levy is applicable on crypto assets bought online by Indians from overseas exchanges.

The government had expanded the scope of the equalisation levy from this year to include any purchase by an Indian or India-based entity through an overseas platform.

The levy is on the selling price and companies may be required to add this to the cost of the crypto assets.

Experts said there is no clarity as to whether cryptocurrencies can be categorised as goods, services or commodities.

Payback time

Since most cryptocurrency exchanges have not paid this levy, the taxman’s scrutiny now means that customers may have to pay up.

Unlike other taxes, equalisation levy is on the selling price, which would mean that the cost of buying the crypto assets will jump by 2% for Indians.

However, many crypto exchanges in the last few years have created structures where they do not have a presence or permanent establishment in India and the Indian entity only takes care of marketing functions.

Many companies have moved to Singapore or Dubai in a bid to safeguard themselves from some of the Indian laws in the last few years.

Permanent establishment is a concept in tax laws that determines which country has the first right to tax a company and to what extent.

Many companies have moved to Singapore or Dubai in a bid to safeguard themselves from some of the Indian laws in the last few years.
Many companies have moved to Singapore or Dubai in a bid to safeguard themselves from some of the Indian laws in the last few years.

Global interest

Global digital currency exchanges are exploring ways to set up in India, following in the footsteps of market leader Binance.

U.S.-based Kraken, British Virgin Islands-based Bitfinex and rival KuCoin are actively scouting the market,

The interest in cryptocurrency has exploded in India over the last 15 months as a bull run began in bitcoin and other virtual currencies.

India’s biggest crypto exchange WazirX along with other exchanges including CoinSwitch Kuber, Zebpay, CoinDCX has seen expotential growth in the last few months. In April, WazirX claimed it hit $5.4 billion in transaction volumes, which is a tenfold rise from $500 million in December 2020. Its user base shot up by 50% to 3 million in April, and in May, it saw crypto trades worth over $380 million on its platform on a single day. CoinSwitch Kuber raised $25 million at a $500 million valuation in April 2021.

ZebPay, India’s oldest exchange for trading cryptocurrencies, aims to double monthly transactions after an explosion in demand.

ZebPay, a platform with about 4 million customers, expects to churn $2 billion worth of trades per month, which is still less than one-fifth of trades handled by top US-based exchange Coinbase Global Inc.

While there is no exact number of cryptocurrency firms operating in India, estimated that at least 50 are actively onboarding customers and collectively processing transactions worth over Rs 15,000 crore annually.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Leading crypto exchanges scout entry into India despite potential ban

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Global digital currency exchanges are exploring ways to set up in India, following in the footsteps of market leader Binance, industry sources told Reuters, while the government in New Delhi dithers over introducing a law that could ban cryptocurrencies.

Opponents of the potential ban say it would stifle the economic power of a tech-savvy, young nation of 1.35 billion people. There is no official data, but industry analysts reckon there are 15 million crypto investors in India holding over 100billion rupees ($1.37 billion).

Three cos scouting market

According to four sources, who declined to be identified as they were not authorised to comment on private discussions,U.S.-based Kraken, British Virgin Islands-based Bitfinex and rival KuCoin are actively scouting the market, which analysts say would only get bigger if it was given a free rein. “These companies have already begun talks to understand the Indian market and the entry points better,” said one source directly involved with an exchange that had begun due diligence for an Indian firm it was considering acquiring.

Also read: The cryptocurrency game: India and the world

The other two exchanges, he said, were in the initial stages of deciding whether to enter India and weighing their options,which effectively come down to a choice between setting up asub sidiary or buying an Indian firm, as Binance, the world’s biggest exchange, did two years ago.

Bitfinex declined to comment while Kraken and KuCoin did not respond to an email seeking comment.

All three exchanges are ranked in the world’s top ten by data platform Coin Market Cap, based on their traffic, liquidity and trustworthiness of their reported trading volumes. “The Indian market is huge and it is only starting to grow, if there was more policy certainty by now Indian consumers would have been spoilt for choice in terms of exchanges, because everyone wants to be here,” said Kumar Gaurav, founder of digital bank Cashaa.

Proponents of cryptocurrencies say they would be the most cost-efficient way for Indians abroad to remit funds home.

But authorities worry that rich people and criminals could hide their wealth in the digital world, and speculative flows of funds through digital channels, ungoverned by India’s strict exchange controls, could destabilise the financial system.

Bill delayed, fate unknown

Hitherto, India has had no rules specifically for cryptocurrency exchanges wishing to set up in the country. Instead they could register themselves as tech companies to obtain a relatively easy entry path.

In 2019, Binance acquired WazirX, an Indian cryptocurrency startup which has allowed users to buy and sell crypto with rupees on the Binance Fiat Gateway.

U.S. based exchange, Coinbase, has announced plans for a back office in India.

But with the regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies taking a turn for worse globally, Indian authorities are exercising greater scrutiny.

In China, authorities have forbidden banks and online payment companies from providing services related to cryptocurrency transactions.

And the Indian government was set to present a bill to parliament by March that proposed a ban on cryptocurrencies, making trading and holding them illegal. But the government has held it back, and conflicting statements since have fuelled uncertainty over the bill’s fate.

Meantime, major Indian banks have begun to sever ties with cryptocurrency exchanges and traders, amid Reserve Bank of India’s concerns about the financial stability risks posed by the volatile asset.

The RBI is looking at launching its own digital currency,but Governor Shaktikanta Das in February described those plans as a “work in progress”.

For all the uncertainty over what India will end up doing, some digital currency exchanges clearly reckon it would be better to gain entry rather than miss out. “It’s clear that the rewards outweigh the perceived risks,which is luring these global firms to the Indian market,” said Darshan Bathija, chief executive officer of Vauld, a foreign crypto exchange with a presence in India.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

China extends its cryptocurrency ban to banks, payments companies, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Beijing: China has banned financial institutions and payments companies from providing services related to cryptocurrency transactions, and warned investors against speculative crypto trading.

It was China’s latest attempt to clamp down on what was a burgeoning digital trading market.

Under the ban, such institutions, including banks and online payments channels, must not offer clients any service involving cryptocurrency, such as registration, trading, clearing and settlement, three industry bodies said in a joint statement on Tuesday. “Recently, cryptocurrency prices have skyrocketed and plummeted, and speculative trading of cryptocurrency has rebounded, seriously infringing on the safety of people’s property and disrupting the normal economic and financial order,” they said in the statement.

China has banned crypto exchanges and initial coin offerings (ICOs) but has not barred individuals from holding cryptocurrencies.

The institutions must not provide saving, trust or pledging services of cryptocurrency, nor issue financial product related to cryptocurrency, the statement also said.

The moves were not Beijing’s first moves against digital currency. In 2017, China shut down its local cryptocurrency exchanges, smothering a speculative market that had accounted for 90% of global bitcoin trading.

In June 2019, the People’s Bank of China issued a statement saying it would block access to all domestic and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges and Initial Coin Offering websites, aiming to clamp down on all cryptocurrency trading with a ban on foreign exchanges.

The statement also highlighted the risks of cryptocurrency trading, saying virtual currencies “are not supported by real value”, their prices are easily manipulated, and trading contracts are not protected by Chinese law.

The three industry bodies are: the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association and the Payment and Clearing Association of China.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2