How can risk management professionals switch between banking & insurance?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Life insurance and the banking sector are the two core sectors where customers keep money with the trust that their money is safe. Both the sectors protect the customer’s money. This article looks at both the assets and liabilities of the banking and insurance sector to find out the similarities and differences. The article also looks at the risks of both sectors to find whether there are opportunities for cross-pollination of people working from both sides.

In both sectors, customers place their money with the respective institutions such as banks and insurance companies. In the banking sector, deposited money creates liability to be returned upon withdrawal. Similarly, in the insurance sector, the premium received creates liability which is paid when a claim arises (death, maturity, and surrender). So, money placed by customers in both sectors creates liability.

Safer asset creation accords secured returns

On the other hand, the money collected by both institutions is invested to back the liabilities which create assets. Under the insurance sector, the money received in the form of a premium is used to purchase the assets like government securities, corporate bonds, equities, and other assets. These assets so purchased to match the amount and tenure of liabilities.

In the banking sector, the money deposited by customers is used to create assets in the form of Government securities, corporate bonds, and equities while other assets are created by giving loans. The bank charges a higher rate of interest from the loanee compared to the depositor to meet expenses and profit margin.

Both the institutions take credit risk by investing to back their liabilities. In the insurance sector, investments are highly regulated with a high percentage of investment in Government bonds and a relatively lower percentage in corporate bonds, and even lesser in equities, thereby having relatively lower credit risk from the point of the probability of default. On the other hand, in banks, most of the assets are created by giving loans to individuals and institutions subject to higher default risk, thereby they have high credit risk. The mechanism of the creation of credit risk under both institutions is similar.

Managing the risk of liquidity

Liquidity risk in the banking sector is a key risk from the customer’s deposit point of view, that is, customers to be paid on demand. Therefore, the banks in India are to maintain a certain Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR). The money kept under CRR may be used to pay when the demand arises from bank customers. The CRR is the ratio of cash required to keep as a reserve as a percentage of total deposits. This cash is either stored in the bank’s vault or deposited with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on which no interest payment is made. The current CRR is 4% of Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL). This money cannot be used for investment and lending.

One of the applications of CRR is to control inflation as high CRR will reduce the amount available for lending in a form of loan thereby reducing banks’ liquidity leading to reduced circulation of money in the economy.

Similar to CRR, another tool used to manage the liquidity in the banking system is the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) is the minimum percentage of deposits (NDTL) that is to be invested in gold, cash, and other securities. These deposits are kept with banks and not with RBI. The current SLR is 18%.

Similar to CRR, SLR is also used to trap the circulation of money in the economy which can control inflation. Also, SLR is used to control the ability of the banks to lend; higher SLR would restrict bank’s ability to give loans.

The restrictions applied in the banking system in a form of CRR and SLR helps in managing the liquidity position of the banks to enable payment to depositors. Similarly, in the insurance sector, to enable the payment of claims, the regulator has prescribed a very strict investment norm with a high percentage of investment in government bonds for the security of money. Such investment in government bonds can be easily liquidated to help maintain liquidity in the insurance sector. Both the sectors use the same methodology of either cash flows or liquidity coverage ratio to assess the liquidity position along with stress tests to identify higher requirements of liquid cash.

In the banking sector, CRR and SLR act like a reserve to be used when required paying to customers on increase in withdrawals, similarly, in the insurance sector, insurance companies are to keep reserves to pay claims when arises. These reserves are calculated at prudential assumption based on guidelines given by the insurance regulator. Such reserves are to be invested based on the regulatory investment guidelines. The purpose of the reserve is to meet the customer’s claims when they arise. In both sectors, there are prudential norms to safeguard the money of the customers in meeting liabilities.

There is a similar inherent mechanism under both the banking and insurance sector to protect the customer’s money, managing the credit and liquidity risk. There can be opportunities for cross-pollination of skills between the two sectors. Actuaries are very strong on the liability side while banking folks are strong on the asset side, an amalgamation is possible.

The blog has been authored by
Sonjai Kumar, Certified Risk Management Professional from IRM London

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Nine ways banks will benefit from the RBI’s Covid rescue package, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India governor Shaktikanta Das has announced a slew of measures for the economy to fight Covid. These will help banks face pandemic distress better.

RBI has announced debt recast schemes to small businesses and MSMEs which had not participated in the resolution last year. This will enable banks to offer help to the sound borrowers who are facing trouble during the second Covid wave.

The new recast scheme offers more flexibility to banks as for a borrower whose debt was recast under the resolution framework last year, that moratorium period can be increased or the residual tenure can be stretched for up to two years.

Banks are also allowed to reassess the working capital limits for small units and MSMEs whose debt has been recast earlier, giving room to lenders to help borrowers.

RBI India has not announced a moratorium on loan and interest payments during the ongoing wave, giving much relief to banks. Moratoriums affect credit discipline, and with banks likely to take a hit on the ‘interest on interest’ burden for over Rs 2 crore loans offered during the last moratorium, they may be less inclined to fresh moratoriums.

Through the Rs 10,000 crore special three-year long-term repo operations, or SLTRO, Small Finance Banks can support small business units, micro as also other unorganised-sector ones, as it allows fresh credit of up to Rs 10 lakh per borrower. SFBs can also categorise fresh loans to smaller microfinance institutions that have assets of up to Rs 500 crore as priority sector loans.

The RBI has also extended the period for the relief given earlier this year, allowing banks relief from CRR on exposures of up to Rs 25 lakh to micro, small and medium enterprises.

The central bank has allowed lenders to use 100% of their floating and counter-cyclical provisions to make specific provisions for non-performing assets (NPAs). This will help them gear up for loan losses that may arise due to severe hit to several economic segments.

With banks reluctant to lend despite Rs 6 lakh crore surplus liquidity in the system, the RBI has incentivised banks by offering extra 60 basis points for surpluses parked in the reverse repo against the loans extended by banks. These loans will be classified as priority sector lending also and the banks need not take direct exposure but can pass on through another intermediary such as NBFC.

The RBI has relieved pressure on prices of bonds held by banks as it has announced another round of the GSAP-1 for Rs 35,000 crore. The central bank will buy back bonds from the market, leading to a rise in their demand and prices. This has led to a rally in bond prices with the benchmark yield slipping below 6%.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY