Short of lending targets, banks seek priority sector tag for retail, infrastructure, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks have reached out to the government seeking priority sector tag for retail trade and infrastructure.

This comes as most lenders are struggling to meet their priority sector targets with premium on lending certificates rising by almost 200 basis points in the last one year. At present only, regional rural banks or RRBs are suppliers of priority sector lending credit.

“We have had informal discussions with the Reserve Bank of India, and have made representation to the government as well,” said a bank executive, aware of the developments, adding that there was a need to broaden the priority sector.

At present lending towards eight sectors including agriculture, micro and small medium enterprises, export credit, housing, education, renewable energy and social infrastructure is considered eligible for priority sector loans. Commercial lenders have to mandatorily deploy 40% of their adjusted net bank credit (ANBC) towards these sectors, of which 18% is allocated towards agriculture.

The latest data from RBI indicates that overall priority sector lending for scheduled commercial banks stood at 40.54% in 2020-21 (as at the end of December 2020) even though there was a marginal shortfall for private sector and foreign banks.

“There are various subcategories within this structure and most banks are unable to meet these requirements and hence there is a need to identify new potential sectors,” the above quoted executive said adding that most big lenders resort to buying priority sector lending certificates (PSLCs) to meet their regulatory requirements. A bank running short of meeting targets can purchase priority sector lending certificates from a lender having surplus for a fee.

“Today, only regional rural banks (RRBs) are suppliers of PSLC and most sponsoring banks buy it from their RRBs,” he said, adding that non-banking finance companies or NBFCs also have underwriting limitations.

The total trading volume of PSLCs recorded a growth of 25.9% and stood at Rs 5.89 lakh crore in 2020-21 as compared with 43.1% growth a year ago.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

India Post Payments Bank, LIC Housing tie up to sell home loans, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India Post Payments Bank (IPPB) has joined hands with LIC Housing Finance for selling housing finance products of the latter to its 4.5 crore customers, a statement said on Tuesday.

Through its robust and extensive network of 650 branches and more than 136,000 banking access points, IPPB will make LIC Housing Finance Ltd’s (LICHFL) home loan products accessible to its customers pan-India, the statement said.

Under the strategic partnership, credit underwriting, processing, and disbursement for all home loans will be handled by LICHFL, while IPPB will source the loans.

The alliance with LICHFL is part of IPPB’s strategy to expand its range of products and services, and to cater to the banking and financial needs of diverse customers, especially unbanked and underserved, across the country.

IPPB already distributes general and life insurance products through partnerships with insurance companies. Credit products are natural extension for the customers at the last mile, the statement said.

IPPB has an on-ground workforce of nearly 200,000 postal employees (postmen and Gramin Dak Sevaks) equipped with micro ATMs and biometric devices for doorstep banking. This will play a significant role in offering LICHFL’s housing loans.

“Easy access to credit for buying a house is an important prerequisite towards achieving inclusive growth. The partnership with LICHFL is a significant tie-up in IPPB’s journey to become one of the largest platforms for availing credit products by our customers for meeting various needs,” J Venkatramu, MD & CEO, India Post Payments Bank said.

LIC Housing Finance MD & CEO Y Viswanatha Gowd said the strategic MoU with IPPB will help the company to further deepen the market penetration.

“It will enable us to increase LICHFL’s home loan product outreach in untapped geographies across the country. With an unmatchable presence of post offices, we see this strategic partnership as a significant step that will help our long-term business growth and improve our market share,” he said.

LIC Housing Finance offers home loans starting from 6.66 per cent for loans up to Rs 50 lakh for salaried individuals.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Northern Arc Capital raises $50 mn via ECB

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Northern Arc Capital, a debt financing platform, today announced that it has successfully concluded a $50 million external commercial borrowing (ECB) transaction with the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

The funds will be used to cater to the credit demands of women borrowers or towards products that disproportionately benefit women, the Chennai-based non-banking finance company (NBFC) said in a press statement.

“This transaction is proof of Northern Arc’s ability to forge partnerships with and attract funding from reputed global DFIs. We are excited to partner with JICA to further our mission of catering to the diverse credit requirements of underserved households and businesses,” Kshama Fernandes, MD & CEO of Northern Arc Capital was quoted in the statement.

JICA is Japan’s governmental agency that works towards promoting economic and social growth in developing countries.

“We expect more Indian women to have access to financial services through this partnership with Northern Arc,” Keiichiro Nakazawa, Senior Vice President of JICA said in the release.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘IBC is a success, now time to bring individual, group and cross border insolvency’, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has been a success so far in its five years of existence and has brought about a “significant change” in the corporate landscape of India in terms of credit culture, feels Biswarup Basu, President at the Institute of Cost Accountants of India. He suggests now is the time to bring individual, group and cross-border insolvency frameworks to further strengthen the framework. Edited excerpts.

Q: What is your take on the IBC regulation? Five years gone, would you read it as a success or a work in progress?

IBC is one of the deepest economic reforms adopted in India. In the last five years, it has brought about a significant change in the corporate landscape of India in terms of credit culture, unlocking of value from the non-performing assets, and the equation between debtors and creditors. This has resulted in putting a large amount of money back into productive channels. It is a nascent law.

Five years in the journey of a law of critical importance is too short, so in a way, there are constant restructuring / amendment of several provisions of the IBC to make it conducive so as to achieve its objectives. So it’s been a success but still the provisions of individual insolvency, cross border insolvency, group insolvency are yet to be notified / operationalised, and to that extent, one can say that it is a work in progress..

Q: What’s your view on 90% haircuts seen in three high profile cases, Jet, Videocon, and Siva?

The objective of IBC is primarily rescuing a company in distress and not recovery. So the outcome of various cases under IBC till now has to be seen in that context. Moreover, the haircut depends upon the stage of distress at which the company is brought into the IBC framework. All these companies were brought under the umbrella of IBC at a much later stage of distress, by which time most of the value of the assets of the company had already been eroded.

Q: Would you say IBC has its limitations and can’t satisfy everyone at the end of the day?

The law stands on its principles and objectives and all the stakeholders accordingly may not have similar outcomes from an IBC matter.

it may be noted that the law is not adversarial in nature where one party wins and the other loses. It seeks to balance the interest of all stakeholders to the extent possible whereby it is not possible to make everyone happy..

Q: What three challenges exist in the current IBC framework? What changes would you propose?

First, the timelines provided under IBC are not being met in the majority of the cases due to litigation and also lack of capacity of NCLT / NCLAT to deal with the large number of cases brought up before them. The NCLT / NCLAT should be strengthened in terms of manpower. Maybe separate benches could be created to deal with IBC matters.

Second, cross border insolvency provisions have not yet been notified. There are many companies that have assets located in multiple jurisdictions. It is suggested that the government should give this matter priority to further enhance the scope of IBC.

Third, individual insolvency provisions have not yet been notified. This should be operationalised sooner to provide succour to the Individuals facing financial hardships.

'IBC is a success, now time to bring individual, group and cross border insolvency’Q: There is a view that the regulators or statutory bodies take their own decisions even after resolutions are approved successfully by the NCLTs. Should there be more clarity on which law is superior?

It is well settled law that once a resolution plan is approved by the adjudicating authority it becomes binding on all stakeholders. There is enough clarity in this regard.

Q: How can CMAs play a role in the resolution of assets under IBC? Today a lot of insolvency professionals are CMAs…

Many CMAs have become insolvency professionals and are regularly handling various cases under IBC. Besides acting as the interim resolution professional / resolution professional, CMAs can also assist in carrying out due diligence, forensic audit, preparation of Information Memorandum, and preparation of resolution plan.

Q: Last, CMAs as RPs have been or are being litigated against quite a lot by promoters or dissenting lenders over haircuts. How should the RPs deal with such a situation?

Many promoters, who find themselves on the verge of losing control of their companies, try to find some way out or at least try to drag the matter longer and thus involve resolution professionals in litigation. The RP should have confidence in his actions, maintain proper documents relating to CIRP, and justify his action appropriately before the adjudicating authority.

ALSO READ: ‘IBC can’t make everyone happy, Videocon case will help law mature further’



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI reshuffles roles at HR and Tech verticals, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State bank of India (SBI) has announced a few key reshuffling in the bank’s HR and Technology departments.

Om Prakash Mishra who was elevated to the post of Deputy Managing Director (DMD) in May 2021, is now designated as DMD (HR) & Corporate Development Officer (CDO).

Prior to becoming the DMD, Om Prakash Mishra has held the position of Chief General Manager (CGM) of SBI Hyderabad Circle.

He has taken over from Rana Ashutosh Kumar Singh who is now holding the portfolio of DMD (Strategy) & Chief Digital Officer.

Rana Ashutosh Kumar Singh, who has been associated with SBI for nearly three decades, has handled important assignments in Retail Banking, Credit, HR and International Banking.

Ravindra Pandey who was serving as DMD (Strategy) & Chief Digital Officer, has now taken charge as DMD and Chief Information Officer (CIO).

In his new role, he is leading the entire IT Ecosystem of the Bank including the running of SBI’s Core Banking System, Digital Channels as well as 400+ applications. He is working towards future-proofing SBI by implementing emerging technologies like AI, ML, Analytics, Robotics, Blockchain etc. He has also had the international experience of heading SBI’s Paris (France) operations as CEO.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Flipkart sees double-digit growth on pay later transactions; crosses 42 million mark, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Flipkart, India’s homegrown e-commerce marketplace, plans to expand its Flipkart Pay Later credit offering, targeting a 2x growth over the next six months. Currently, there are over 2.8 million customers who have adopted Flipkart Pay Later and have made more than 42 million transactions on the platform to date.

Owing to the growing reliance on digital payments, Flipkart Pay Later has seen a 70% adoption rate among customers at the time of check-out and plans to cross the 100 million transaction benchmark by the end of the year.

As digital adoption continues to increase across the country and customers seek value-driven credit options, Flipkart Pay Later has seen an increase of over 50% in the number of registered users as of July 21 in comparison to the previous year. Customers have used the offering mainly for purchases across categories of beauty and general merchandise, home and lifestyle. In fact, in categories such as lifestyle, Flipkart Pay Later has exceeded the credit card transactions, making it the top prepaid instrument used by consumers for the category.

“As a homegrown platform, enabling accessibility and affordability for customers is at the heart of all our offerings. The success of Flipkart Pay Later so far has shown the benefits that the construct is able to provide to millions of customers and made us confident of its market-readiness for a much wider adoption – both on and outside Flipkart Group’s platforms.” said Ranjith Boyanapalli, Head – Fintech and Payments Group at Flipkart.

Flipkart plans to expand the reach of its ‘Pay Later’ construct to make credit available not just on Flipkart’s platform but on other partner channels as well.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian Bank inks pact with IIT-Guwahati’s centre for start-up financing

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Chennai-headquartered Indian Bank has signed an agreement with IIT Guwahati Technology Incubation Centre (TIC) for financing start-ups under Bank’s loan product “IND Spring Board”.

The MoU was signed by K S Sudhakara Rao, General Manager (MSME), Indian Bank and Professor R. Ganesh Narayanan – Technology Incubation Centre (TIC), IIT-Guwahati on Thursday.

Indian Bank’s ‘Ind Spring Board” scheme aims to empower start-ups to realise their research efforts powered by financial support from the bank. Under this product, the bank supports start-ups by extending up to ₹50 crore as working capital and fund-based term loan requirements for acquiring fixed assets.

“The Bank is committed to economic upliftment and boosting the entrepreneurship of the people of Assam and Northeast India. This is a step in that direction,” said a statement.

Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati- Technology Incubation Centre (IITG-TIC) encourages youth to take advantage of this initiative who have creative pursuits with an inherent zeal to be entrepreneurs.

The bank has already tied up with IIT-Madras, IISc-Bengaluru and Chennai Angels for identifying the eligible start-ups for finance under this scheme.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SIDBI’s FY21 net up 3.6% at ₹2,398 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) reported a 3.6 per cent increase in FY21 net profit at ₹2,398 crore against ₹2,315 crore in FY20 on the back of lower interest and finance charges as well as operating expenses.

Net Interest Income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) grew 11.5 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to ₹3,678 crore in FY21 against ₹3,299 crore in FY20, the Development Financial Institution (DFI) said in a statement.

Non-interest income declined 12 per cent YoY to ₹944 crore in FY21 against ₹1,069 crore in FY20.

Interest & finance charges were down about 15 per cent YoY to ₹6,543 crore (₹7,722 crore). Operating declined about 8 per cent YoY to ₹560 crore (₹607 crore).

Net interest margin increased by 10 basis points (bps) to 2.04 per cent as on March 31, 2021 from 1.94 per cent as on March 31, 2020, the DFI said.

Total advances of the DFI, which is engaged in creating an integrated credit and development support ecosystem for Indian Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME), declined about 6 per cent YoY to ₹1,56,233 crore as of March 31, 2021, from ₹1,65,422 crore as of March 31, 2020.

However, investments jumped 72 per cent YoY to ₹19,153 crore from ₹11,118 crore.

Gross Non-Performing Assets (GNPA) ratio decreased by 45 basis points (bps) from 0.63 per cent to 0.18 per cent, and Net NPA (NNPA) ratio decreased by 28 bps from 0.40 per cent to 0.12 per cent, as on March 31, 2021.

SIDBI said Provision Coverage Ratio (PCR) rose to 93.24 per cent as on March-end 2021 from 78.35 per cent as on March-end level.

There are 23 shareholders in the DFI including State Bank of India (16.73 per cent stake), Government of India (15.4 per cent), Life Insurance Corporation of India (14.25 per cent), National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development (10 per cent), Punjab National Bank (6.37 per cent) and Bank of Baroda (5.43 per cent).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Microfinance sector hit as defaults surge in pandemic

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Small loan specialists in India that typically cater to people without bank accounts are facing a jump in pandemic-related defaults that could force some of them out of business, industry experts warn.

Loans overdue by 30 days are expected to reach 14-16 per cent of all so-called microfinance loans in the immediate aftermath of the second Covid-19 wave sweeping India, said Krishnan Sitaraman, senior director at credit rating agency Crisil.

That’s higher than 6-7 per cent in March, before the second wave took hold, and also above the 11.7 per cent reached in March 2017 after the demonetisation drive — an attempt to boost digital transactions and crack down on undeclared money that also hit microfinance lenders hard.

ALSO READ MFIs need bold policy support

“Older loans that were taken in 2019 or early 2020 are at a higher risk of defaults and they form about 60-65 per cent of the loanbook for lenders,” said Harsh Shrivastava, former head of the Microfinance Institutions Network, an association representing the sector in India.

Rahul Johri, chair of Vector Finance, a microfinance firm that provides loans to small enterprises, said many support measures brought in by the government had only helped larger institutions, while smaller players had struggled.

“It has become an existence issue for several small and mid-sized microfinance institutions as business has been severely impacted and collections are down,” said Johri.

Loan collection efficiency across the total loan pool has fallen to about 70 per cent from a peak of nearly 95 per cent in March, analysts say, indicating a potential build up in stress.

The gross loan portfolio of India’s microfinance lenders stood at ₹2.6-lakh crore ($35 billion) as of March 31, according to Crisil.

ALSO READ NBFC-MFIs: Sector sees nearly 25% decline in FY21

Bumpy road ahead

Despite the short-term challenges, some remain bullish on the sector and expect it to bounce back if an anticipated third wave is not so severe.

“About 55 per cent of the market is still untapped which means there is huge market opportunity … so things will look up soon,”said Johri.

But for now, many smaller microfinance firms are struggling.

Such companies, typically with loan books of less than ₹5-lakh crore ($67 million), have also seen their cost of funds rise by 100-150 basis points as banks and companies have become less willing to lend to them, said one industry executive, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Some microfinance firms have had to scale back capital raising plans due to tepid interest from investors, said the heads of two firms that have been looking to raise funds.

As smaller players falter, some have stopped paying salaries, or incentives to employees in recent months, they added, asking not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.

“We are now only getting basic salaries, incentives have completely stopped in the last few months as collections are down,” said a collection agent.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5