Global banks face Bear Stears, Lehman like impact in Archegos default, BFSI News, ET BFSI
[ad_1]
Read More/Less
Much of the leverage used by Hwang’s Archegos Capital Management was provided by banks including Nomura Holdings and Credit Suisse Group through swaps or so-called contracts-fordierence (CFDs), according to people with direct knowledge of the deals. It means Archegos may never actually have owned most of the underlying securities — if any at all.
Archegos troubles
While investors who build a stake of more than 5 per cent in a US-listed company usually have to disclose their position and future transactions, that’s not the case with stakes built through the type of derivatives apparently used by Archegos. The products, which are made to exchanges, allow managers like Hwang to amass stakes in publicly traded companies without having to declare their holdings.
The swift unwinding of Archegos has reverberated across the globe, after banks such as Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley forced Hwang’s arm to sell billions of dollars in investments accumulated through highly leveraged bets. The selloff roiled stocks from Baidu to ViacomCBS, and prompted Nomura and Credit Suisse to disclose that they face potentially significant losses on their exposure. One reason for the widening fallout is the borrowed funds that investors use to magnify their bets: a margin call occurs when the market goes against a large, leveraged position, forcing the hedge fund to deposit more cash or securities with its broker to cover any losses. Archegos was probably required to deposit only a small percentage of the total value of trades.
Massive unwinding
The chain of events set off by this massive unwinding is yet another reminder of the role that hedge funds play in the global capital markets. A hedge fund short squeeze during a Reddit-fueled frenzy for Gamestop Corp. shares earlier this year spurred a $6 billion loss for Gabe Plotkin’s Melvin Capital and sparked scrutiny from US regulators and politicians.
The idea that one firm can quietly amass outsized positions through the use of derivatives could set o another wave of criticism directed against loosely regulated firms that have the power to destabilize markets. While the margin calls on Friday triggered losses of as much as 40 per cent in some shares, there was no sign of contagion in markets broadly on Monday.
Rescues galore
Contrast that with 2008, when Ireland’s then-richest man used derivatives to build a position so large in Anglo Irish Bank it eventually contributed to the country’s international bailout. In 2015, New York-based FXCM Inc. needed rescuing because of losses at its UK ailiate resulting from the unexpected depegging of the Swiss franc. Much about Hwang’s trades remains unclear, but market participants estimate his assets had grown to anywhere from $5 billion to $10 billion in recent years and total positions may have topped $50 billion.
CFDs and swaps are among bespoke derivatives that investors trade privately between themselves, or over-the-counter, instead of through public exchanges. Such opacity helped to worsen the 2008 financial crisis and regulators have introduced a vast new body of rules governing the assets since then.
[ad_2]
Financial Express is now on Telegram.