Kotak Mahindra Bank Q1 net profit up 32%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Kotak Mahindra Bank reported a 31.9 per cent jump in standalone net profit for the quarter ended June 30 at ₹1,641.92 crore compared to ₹1,244.45 crore in the same period last fiscal.

Total income grew 4.9 per cent to ₹8,062.81 crore (₹7,685.4 crore).

Net interest income increased 5.8 per cent to ₹3,942 crore (₹3,724 crore).

Net interest margin for the first quarter was at 4.6 per cent versus 4.4 per cent a year ago.

Other income more than doubled to ₹1,583.03 crore (₹773.54 crore). Of this, fee income surged 50.6 per cent to ₹1,169 crore on an annual basis.

Provisions declined marginally to ₹934.77 crore in the first quarter from ₹962.01 crore a year ago.

“Covid related provisions as of June 30 were maintained at ₹1,279 crore,” the bank said in a statement on Monday.

Total restructuring

In accordance with the Resolution Framework for Covid-19 and MSME announced by RBI, the bank implemented total restructuring of ₹552 crore as of June 30against ₹435 crore as on March 31, .

Covid related restructuring in the first round was about ₹226 crore while it was very less in the second round.

The lender faced headwinds in terms of asset quality deterioration amidst the second wave of the pandemic. Gross non-performing assets rose to ₹7,931.77 crore or 3.56 per cent of gross advances as on June 30, 2021 compared to 2.7 per cent a year ago.

Dipak Gupta, Joint Managing Director, Kotak Mahindra Bank, said there were challenges in terms of the ability of customers to pay as well as customers who could not be reached in time and moved into NPAs.

“Collections have normalised in June and July. We expect a reasonable number of customers, who couldn’t be reached for collections, to start payments,” he said.

Net NPAs were also elevated at 1.28 per cent of net advances as against 0.87 per cent as on June 30, 2020.

Capital adequacy ratio of the bank as per Basel III norms as of June 30, was 23.1 per cent and Tier-I ratio was 22.2 per cent.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Mahindra Finance posts Q1 net loss of ₹1,573 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Amidst Covid related stress in rural and semi-urban markets, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services reported a consolidated net loss of ₹1,573.4 crore in the first quarter of the current fiscal against net profit of ₹432.12 crore in the corresponding period in 2020-21.

Total income declined 16 per cent to ₹2,567 crore during the quarter ended June 30, against ₹3,069 crore in the corresponding quarter last year.

To cover any contingencies due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the company carried an additional overlay of ₹2,709 crore (pre-tax) in the standalone financial statements and ₹2,808 crore (pre-tax) in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30.

Noting that the second wave of Covid had a severe impact on the semi-urban and rural markets, where it has major operations, Mahindra Finance said for the first quarter , disbursements dropped 35 per cent on a sequential basis to ₹3,872 crore, though it grew 42 per cent on a year-on-year basis.

Gross non-performing assets were higher at 15.5 per cent as on June 30, compared to nine per cent as of March 31, 2021.

“The company believes that the elevated NPAs are not a reflection of any credit risk increase but are purely delays caused by liquidity situation. Our experience in the past has always shown a return to normalcy by these segments of customers once their earnings stabilise,” Mahindra Finance said in a statement, adding that as the market conditions normalise over the next few quarters.

During the first quarter, it implemented resolution plans to relieve Covid -19 related stress of eligible borrowers in 59,455 loan accounts with a total outstanding of ₹2,172 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

South Indian Bank net profit slips on higher credit cost

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Higher credit cost had its impact on the profitability of South Indian Bank in the first quarter of FY22. The bank has posted a net profit of ₹10.31 crore in Q1 compared to ₹81.65 crore in the corresponding period of the previous year.

However, the operating profit has registered a 26.86 per cent growth in Q1 at ₹512.12 crore as against ₹403.68 crore during the corresponding period of the previous year.

Murali Ramakrishnan, MD & CEO said that slippages during the quarter was on the higher side by which the gross NPA and net NPA stood at 8.02 and 5.05 per cent, respectively, as on June 30 in view of Covid scenario, affecting various sectors.

Also read: South Indian Bank posts net profit of nearly ₹7 crore in Q4

Meanwhile, during this quarter, the bank could improve the Provision Coverage Ratio to 60.11 per cent as on June 30 as against 58.73 per cent as on March 31.

The bank has strengthened the review and monitoring system of the advance portfolio to improve the credit quality and thereby bringing drastic reduction in the slippages and improving upgrades/ recovery, he added.

The prevailing Covid scenario impacted the growth in the business and personal loan segment. While the bank could register substantial growth in the desired segments such as gold loan portfolio during the period, the strategy to reduce lumpy advances continued and share of corporate advances stands at 24 per cent of total advances as on June 30, he said.

The Capital Adequacy Ratio of stands comfortable at 15.47 per cent as on June 30. The bank plans to raise additional capital during FY 21-22 to further strengthen the capital base, he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dinanath Dubhashi, L&T Finance, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The strength we have built up was a strong balance sheet with good provisioning, said Dinanath Dubhashi, MD & CEO, L&T Finance Holdings. “We had just raised the rights issue, built business strengths, built collection strengths, and built strengths on the liability side and each one of this was tested in quarter one,” he added. Edited excerpts:

Though it has been a tough patch for all, both personally and professionally, you have managed to grow 20% year on year. Let us talk about what has led to this growth.

I would take this to last time I spoke with your channel, and that was at the end of the Q4 results. We had mentioned at that time that a few things that the company is doing is going beyond the profits and quarterly performance. That is to make sure that we build strengths which will help us to do well in the medium-to-long term, but also deal with any short-term problems which come. And the short-term problems came.

So, the strength we have built up was a strong balance sheet with good provisioning. We had just raised the rights issue, built business strengths, built collection strengths, and built strengths on the liability side and each one of this was tested in quarter one. Quarter one was very strange. First 15 days of April were absolutely okay. The second 15 days of April, entire May, and maybe the first 15-20 days of June were very bad in the sense. I mean forget business, people were afraid for their lives and we all know that. Then again, things have started improving towards the end of June and July they have improved even further.

The strengths that we have built have manifested. As you rightly put: profits are up 20%. Now I must also say that we are comparing to last year first quarter, which was also a bad quarter. So, I must be upfront about that. But still, a COVID quarter to COVID quarter 20% growth is a good performance. There are some things which have happened even better. We, even in this climate, in our rural book we have had our best ever first quarter disbursements. Even though for a month, month-and-a-half, everything was closed, we got our best ever first quarter disbursements. Our rural book is actually up by 8%. We have seen some run downs and some procurements in our infra book which has actually taken our retailisation quickly up to around 46%. These are the good things.

Second is cost of liabilities. The liability franchise we have built and cost of liabilities have remained very well in control. In fact, they have remained at the same level as in Q4 and substantially below last year Q1. All this has led to a good growth and before provision stage which has enabled us to take further anticipatory provisions, or what we call macro prudential functions, and make our balance sheet stronger.

Last year what we did was we built our macro prudential provision in the first two quarters and the last two quarters we reversed, which actually helped us. This method of taking early provisions and then using them helped us. We are doing that again. We have taken around 370 crores, but God forbid if a COVID wave three comes and I do not think anybody can predict that we will be ready and that balance is what actually signifies the importance of this quarter’s result. Of course, the icing on the cake is the 20% profit growth.

Why is that your NPAs for the quarter have gone up by nearly 75 bps? If one looks at the provisioning cover, it has changed.
Most definitely, in the COVID quarter the gross NPAs are going up, which is no surprise. I mean, it is a COVID quarter, so that is one thing. But if you observe carefully and compare year on year, the absolute amount of gross GST has actually come down. It is basically because the book has gone down, as I told you, the ratio has gone up. Just to point that out: the overall gross stage three absolute amount has actually come down a little bit, or let us say remained the same year on year. That is the first thing.

It is no surprise and I would not like to defend that that gross stage three will go up in a COVID year or in a COVID quarter, and hence what we need to do. And you never know, that trend may continue. We are hoping that it will reverse, but it may continue. Because of that what is important is we create additional provisions. Now provision coverage on NPA is a function of ECL model. So, it can go 3-4% up and down. But if you count our Rs 1,400 crore of additional provisions, which is there now on the balance sheet on standard assets, that prepares us tremendously for any NPA increase which may happen and that is the point that I am trying to make.

Rather than a quarter on quarter changing NPA in any COVID wave and especially the wave that was where customers were afraid, frankly our people were afraid of going out for a month or so. There were restrictions on movement, so most definitely it will affect. The important point is that we have made anticipatory provisions and are ready to phase any further effect of this that may happen. The positive side is businesses are picking up and rural India is definitely picking up. Most importantly, our people are now more than 90% vaccinated. We did a big campaign and more than 20,000 are now vaccinated and hence more able to travel. I think the medium-term prospects look good.

Given the second COVID wave is receding, can we say that the worst of the impact as far as collections or asset quality go is over?
I will talk both business as well as collections. Business farm, that is tractors, have started recovering very quickly. The important thing is the manufacturer space, there were supply chain problems last year in the first quarter. This year there were no supply chain problems. The manufacturing and the production were happening. So, the question was whether point of sales is open, tractor dealerships are opened, and two-wheeler dealerships are open. The rural dealerships opened earlier and the business started faster. The urban dealerships are just opening and we hope that the business will start from here.

If you talk about micro loans, as collection picks up, then disbursement will also pick up there. Housing definitely, again, lots of registration offices were closed. People were unable to visit sites to go and buy a house. Buyer and seller meetings were a problem. All these kept quarter one at a fairly low level. Slowly, these things are picking up, but the important thing is collections. Actually, the collection efficiencies which we have shown and we have put in the presentation have, other than micro loans, improved between May and June. All the other products – and that is important – and micro loans did not improve in June, but already in the first 15 days of July it has improved and substantially.

I would not be crystal ball gazing and say the worst is over. I think this can be the famous last words going by our COVID two experience. But most definitely, in most products June looked better than May and July is certainly looking better. Now yes, if a COVID wave three comes, who knows. I mean nobody was able to predict wave two, so I do not think anybody will be able to predict wave three. Hence, we should be prepared in all the aspects of the company. But to answer your question in one short sentence, July is definitely looking better than June.

In Q1 L&T achieved NIMs plus fees of 7.52%. What is your outlook for margins in FY22 given the uncertain environment?

Margins is a question of two things: one is interest cost, and I have said that our treasury has done extremely well. Q4 we thought was the lowest ever, and in Q1 we have done at the same level. We have reduced it maybe 1 bps, but that would be very good. The second good thing we have done is actually using this low interest cost regime locked into good medium-to-long term funds. Hence, we believe that even if the host of funds will definitely slowly go up from Q2 onwards, the trajectory will be lower and we will be able to retain our margin.

The second is a mix between retail and wholesale. As we said, at this time our infra business and infra book actually degrow. Infra book degrow and the rural book grew because of that the product mix move towards higher margin products. To answer your question, 7.5 is definitely way above what we guide, but yes, I do not think it should fall way below 7% or anything like that. We always guide between 6.5% to 7%, and we should be able to stay on the higher end of that guidance.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Profit rises by 20% to Rs 178 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: L&T Finance Holdings on Friday reported 20 per cent rise in net profit at Rs 178 crore for June quarter 2021-22, mainly driven by rural demand for farm equipment. The non-banking financial company had registered Rs 148 crore profit in the year-ago period.

LTFH said COVID-related partial lockdowns in April and May had an impact on few businesses during the quarter under review.

However, with gradual unlock of the economy from June, the disbursements bounced back led by faster pick-up in economic activity across farm equipment finance, two-wheeler finance, consumer loans and infrastructure finance.

Due to slower industry pick-up, the micro loans, housing and real estate business saw moderate uptick in collections and disbursements, it said.

Farm equipment finance witnessed 130 per cent growth at Rs 1,357 crore as against Rs 590 crore in the year-ago period.

Infrastructure finance showed robust disbursement momentum post unlock and continued sell-down with Rs 1,480 crore disbursed in the quarter.

The business continues to see robust performance backed by higher sell-down volumes and refinancing, it added.

The company’s gross non-performing assets (NPAs) rose a tad to 5.75 per cent during the quarter as against 5.24 per cent in the year- ago period. Net NPAs or bad loans rose to 2.07 per cent from 1.71 per cent.

From 2018-19, LTFH started building macro-prudential provisions for any unanticipated future events which held the company in good stead.

Continuing this focus, as a prudent measure LTFH created additional provisions of Rs 369 crore in the quarter under review. With this, it is carrying total additional provisions of Rs 1,403 crore (1.75 per cent of standard book), it said.

These provisions are over and above the expected credit losses on NPA and standard asset provisions.

“Despite severe impact of COVID 2.0, the learnings from COVID 1.0 held us in good stead in managing short-term challenges and helped maximise positive impact on business metrics.

“Our Q1FY22 performance reflects the fact that the company has built a sustainable business model, one which will enable it to grow in the medium to long-term while dealing with any short-term challenges (including impact of COVID 2.0),” LTFH Managing Director & CEO Dinanath Dubhashi said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Icra survey, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Around 42 per cent of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) expect a growth of more than 15 per cent in their asset under management (AUM) in fiscal 2021-22, says an Icra Ratings survey. The findings are based on a survey of 65 non-banks, constituting around 60 per cent of the industry AUM.

The agency conducted the survey to understand the impact of the second wave of COVID-19 on these entities and their expectations going forward.

It said NBFCs growth expectations have moderated vis-a-vis the expectations six months earlier. This follows the possible impact of Covid 2.0 on business in Q1 FY2022.

“While 42 per cent of the issuers (NBFCs by number) are expecting a more than 15 per cent growth in AUM in FY2022, the proportion based on AUM weights is much lower at 8 per cent, indicating that larger players in the segment expect a relatively moderate growth in FY2022,” the agency’s Vice President (Financial Sector Ratings) Manushree Saggar said.

With most of the lenders (74 per cent in AUM terms) indicating an up to 10 per cent AUM growth, the agency expects the growth for the overall industry to be about 7-9 per cent for FY2022.

Within the non-bank finance sector, segments like MFIs, SME-focussed NBFCs and affordable housing finance would continue to record much higher growth than the overall industry averages, supported by good demand and lower base, she said.

The survey said with gradual easing of lockdowns and moderation in fresh cases of Covid and with increased vaccination coverage, the lenders are optimistic on growth pick-up in balance part of FY2022 and expect it to be higher than the growth seen in FY2021.

However, the non-bank finance companies are expecting the asset quality related pain to persist in the current fiscal as well, it showed.

“Overall, 87 per cent of issuers (by AUM) expect reported gross stage 3/ NPAs to be either same or higher than March 2021 levels, which in turn will keep the credit costs elevated,” it said.

Over 90 per cent of lenders (by AUM) expects the credit costs to remain stable or increase further over FY2021 levels.

On the restructuring front, while lenders are expecting marginally higher numbers as compared to the last fiscal, the overall numbers are expected to be low, the agency said.

Saggar said with no blanket moratorium and reflecting the stress on the cash flows of the underlying borrowers, mid-sized lenders (AUM between Rs 5,000-Rs 20,000 crore) are expecting a higher share of restructuring under Restructuring 2.0.

“Overall, the restructured book of non-bank finance entities is expected to double to 3.1-3.3 per cent in March 2022 from 1.6 per cent in March 2021,” Saggar added.

The agency said a significantly higher number of issuers (56 per cent) are expecting to raise capital in FY2022 as compared to the earlier survey, wherein only 28 per cent of the issuers were expected capital raise in FY2022.

It expects the pre-tax profitability for non-bank finance companies in FY2022 would remain similar to the last fiscal which was around 30 per cent lower than the pre-Covid levels.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Covid claims for life insurers to rise but sector well prepared: Sumit Rai

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The number of Covid related claims for life insurers in the second wave of the pandemic is likely to be three to four times of the first wave, believes Sumit Rai, Managing Director and CEO, Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance.

“Claims have increased significantly but typically they come with a lag,” Rai said, adding that most life insurers had anticipated it and are prepared for it.

“I don’t expect the impact to be very adverse and don’t think it will set the industry back very significantly,” he said in an interaction with BusinessLine. The impact of the higher claims will be visible on aspects like term pricing, he added.

Edelweiss Tokio settled 487 Covid related claims amounting to ₹45.82 crore in 2020-21. In the first quarter of this fiscal, it has settled 153 such claims of ₹16.39 crore.

RBI report

According to the Reserve Bank of India’s Financial Stability Report, July 2021, the life insurance industry received 22,205 claims worth ₹1,644.56 crore during 2020-21 where death was due to Covid and related complications, which amounted to 0.3 per cent of total premium income of the year.

“The pandemic did not have a significant impact on death claim settlement rates,” it noted.

However, there is concern among analysts that the spike in claims in the second wave could put pressure on the bottomline of insurers in the quarter ended June 30, 2021.

Kotak Life Insurance had said it expects to incur a loss of up to ₹275 crore in the quarter ended June 30, 2021 due to increased Covid claims.

Rai is, however, optimistic about the prospects of the life insurance sector and expects the industry will grow by 12 per cent to 15 per cent in the next few years. “This pandemic has given a fillip to life insurance. On a long term basis, industry will continue to do well,” he said.

Edelweiss Tokio expects to grow at a higher rate than the industry. “Our goal is to grow better than the industry at between 15 per cent to 20 per cent over the next two to three years,” he said, adding that the focus will be to be multi-channel. The insurer plans to launch a new term product as well as a guaranteed return product this fiscal.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Pressure on risk currencies subside, US inflation in focus

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Risk currencies hovered above their recent lows against the dollar and the yen on Monday, as fears about slowdown in the global economic recovery appeared to have subsided for now.

The outlook for US inflation and the speed of the Federal Reserve‘s future policy tightening are back in focus ahead of Tuesday’s consumer price data and Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s testimony from Wednesday.

“If we see strong data, the Fed could bring forward their projection for their first rate hike further from their current forecast of 2023. That would also mean they have to finish tapering earlier,” said Shinichiro Kadota, senior FX strategist at Barclays.

The euro traded at $1.1873, edging back from its three-month low of $1.17815 set on Wednesday while against the yen the common currency stood at ¥130.87, off Thursday’s 2-1/2-month low of ¥129.63.

Sterling also ticked up to $1.3900, while the Australian dollar bounced back to $0.7487 from Friday’s seven-month low of $0.7410.

ALSO READ Rupee slides toward year’s low as India’s trade deficit widens

Risk currencies slipped earlier last week as investors curtailed their bets on them, in part as economic data from many countries fell short of the market’s expectations.

Concerns about the Delta variant of the novel coronavirus also added to the cautious mood although few investors thought the economic recovery would be derailed.

Chinese eonomy

Selling in risk currencies subsided by Friday, however, and sentiment was bolstered further after China cut banks’ reserve requirement ratio across the board, to underpin its economic recovery that is starting to lose momentum.

On Monday, the Chinese yuan was flat at 6.4785 per dollar, off Friday’s 2-1/2-month low of 6.5005.

A recovery in risk sentiment hampered the safe-haven yen on Monday. The Japanese currency stood at 110.17 yen per dollar, off Thursday’s one-month high of 109.535.

With the data calendar on Monday relatively bare, many investors are looking to Tuesday’s US consumer price data for June.

Economists polled by Reuters expect core CPI to have risen 0.4 per cent from May and 4 per cent from a year earlier after two straight months of sharp gains in prices.

Any signs that inflation could be more persistent than previously thought could fan expectations the Fed may exit from current stimulus earlier, supporting the dollar against other major currencies.

Conversely, more benign data could lead investors to think the US central bank can afford to maintain an easy policy framework for longer, encouraging more bets on risk assets,including risk-sensitive currencies.

Cryptocurrencies were little moved, with bitcoin at $34,267and ether at $2,137.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

D-Street investors’ wealth jumps by Rs 2.19 lakh cr in 2 days, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Investors’ wealth has jumped by Rs 2.19 lakh crore in two days of market rally, with the market capitalisation of BSE-listed companies reaching a fresh record of Rs 2,31,74,726 crore.

Gaining for the second straight session, the 30-share BSE Sensex closed 395.33 points or 0.75 per cent higher at 52,880 on Monday. The benchmark had closed 166.07 points higher on Friday.

Following the buoyant sentiment, the market capitalisation of BSE-listed firms zoomed Rs 2,19,283.79 crore in two days to its all-time high of Rs 2,31,74,726 crore.

“Overall sentiment were positive on account of fall in COVID-19 infections and indications of more availability of vaccines. Hopes of a sustained reopening of the economy led to buying in sectors which were most affected by COVID,” said Siddhartha Khemka, Head – Retail Research, Motilal Oswal Financial Services.

In Monday’s trade, State Bank of India was the biggest gainer in the 30 frontline companies pack, gaining 1.92 per cent, followed by Tata Steel, L&T, Bajaj Finserv, Larsen & Toubro and Axis Bank.

In contrast, Tech Mahindra, Dr Reddy’s, HCL Tech, Titan, Bharti Airtel and TCS were the laggards, falling up to 1.34 per cent.

In the broader market, the BSE mid-cap and small-cap indices gained up to 0.78 per cent.

From sectoral indices, only power closed lower, while realty topped the chart with a gain of 2.84 per cent, followed by metal at 1.49 per cent.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank loans to industrial sector shrink during Modi rule, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The share of banks in loans to the industrial sector dropped massively during 2014-2021 even as credit to the retail sector, including home loans, saw a boom.

As per the data, industrial credit fell to 28.9% by March 2021 from 42.7% at the end of March 2014.

“Over recent years, the share of the industrial sector in total bank credit has declined whereas that of personal loans has grown,” the Reserve Bank of India said in its Financial Stability Report.

The environment for bank credit remains lacklustre in the midst of the pandemic, with credit supply muted by persisting risk aversion and subdued loan demand and within this overall setting, underlying shifts are becoming more evident than before, it said.

Loans to the private corporate sector declined from 37.6% in 2014 to 27.7% at the end of March 2021. During the same period, personal loans grew from 16.2 to 26.3%, in which housing loans grew from 8.5% to 13.8%.

Fiscal 2021

Bank credit growth to the industrial sector decelerated 0.8% year-to-date as of May 21, 2021, due to poor loan offtake from the corporate sector.

Growth in credit to the private corporate sector, however, declined for the sixth successive quarter in the fourth quarter of the last fiscal and its share in total credit stood at 28.3 per cent. RBI said the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on outstanding credit has moderated by 91 basis points during 2020-21, including a decline of 21 basis points in Q4.

Overall credit growth in India slowed down in FY21 to 5.6 per cent from 6.4 per cent in FY20 as the economy was hit hard by Covid. and subsequent lockdowns.

Credit growth to the industrial sector remained in the negative territory during 2020-21, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdowns. Industrial loan growth, on the other hand, remained negative during all quarters of 2020-21.”

The RBI further said working capital loans in the form of cash credit, overdraft and demand loans, which accounted for a third of total credit, contracted during 2020-21, indicating the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Shift to bonds

The corporate world focused on deleveraging high-cost loans through fundraising via bond issuances despite interest rates at an all-time low. This has led to muted credit growth for banks.

Corporates raised Rs 2.1 lakh crore in December ended quarter and Rs 3.1 lakh crore in the fourth quarter from the corporate bond markets. In contrast, the corresponding year-ago figures were Rs 1.5 lakh crore and Rs 1.9 lakh crore, respectively.

Bonds were mostly raised by top-rated companies at 150-200 basis points below bank loans. Most of the debt was raised by government companies as they have top-rated status.

For AAA-rated corporate bonds, the yield was 6.85 per cent in May 2020, which fell to 5.38 per cent in April 2021 and to 5.16 per cent in May 2021.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 4 5 6 7 8 17