India has a backdoor entry into digital currency. Will it take it?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s central bank is opening its balance sheet to the public. Retail investors will have online access to the government bond market via investment accounts with the Reserve Bank.

As the government’s investment bank, the RBI manages institutional buying and selling in gilt securities. Scepticism is high about ‘Retail Direct’ because previous attempts at bringing public debt to the masses haven’t gone anywhere. But if the initiative takes off, it could be a precursor to an interest-paying digital currency competing with bank deposits.

Also read: Bill to regulate cryptocurrencies being finalised: Thakur

The idea of a central bank digital currency, which will reside on smartphones but as a direct claim on the state (rather than a bank) is gaining ground everywhere. Covid-19 has made people reluctant to handle cash for fear of infection. The pandemic has also underscored the need to extend timely financial support to people who don’t have bank accounts.

The rise of cryptocurrencies and Facebook Inc’s Libra initiative, now known as Diem, have made authorities sit up and take note. If they don’t offer their own official tokens, private coins — or another country’s virtual cash — might fill the vacuum. Any semblance of monetary sovereignty in emerging markets may be compromised.

A quarter of the world’s population is likely to get access to a general purpose central bank digital currency in one to three years, according to the latest Bank for International Settlements survey of monetary authorities. Regulators in another 21 per cent of jurisdictions aren’t ruling out the possibility that they, too, might join in. That number is up from 14 per cent in a 2019 BIS poll.

Unlike China, which is running pilots, and the European Central Bank, which will soon publish results of its public consultations, India is not a frontrunner in the race to issue virtual cash. While summing up the many changes in the payments landscape over the past decade, the RBI said last month that it’s “exploring the possibility as to whether there is a need for a digital version of fiat currency and in case there is, then how to operationalise it.”

Also read: Cryptocurrency surge may continue, but regulatory uncertainties create bottlenecks

That’s why Retail Direct assumes significance, says Krishna Hegde, head of strategy at Setu, a Bangalore-based fintech firm. Rather than taking the weight of individual investors on its core banking system, perhaps the RBI will only allow their banks to act as custodians. Individual investors will come to the government securities marketplace through their banks’ so-called Constituents’ Subsidiary General Ledger accounts with the monetary authority. But if money can move quickly and without friction between these accounts at the central bank, India may get a version of official digital cash.

This could have long-run implications for the banking system. State Bank of India, the country’s biggest lender, offers 2.7 per cent interest on demand deposits, and 5.4 per cent on five-year deposits. A seven-day treasury bill yields 3 per cent, and a five-year government bond trades at 5.8 per cent. Banks with large deposit bases may not want to popularise a product that could undermine their hold on low-cost household savings. But newer institutions like payments banks, which take small deposits and aren’t allowed to lend commercially, will run with it. Vijay Shekhar Sharma, a fintech pioneer and chairman of Paytm Payments Bank, says he’ll make Retail Direct a key feature. “By offering gilt securities, we’ll be able to offer high yields and super safe products to consumers,” he told me.

Whether meaningful excess yield will actually be available will depend on liquidity, and the cost for market makers to provide it. That’s where blockchain might come in handy. Self-executing contracts programmed into virtual tokens can help fractionalise and democratise finance by automating trade settlement, making it both quicker and less expensive. Once they’re widely used as a store of value, the tokens could also start circulating as a means of exchange. Anyone may be able to pay for a coffee using her account with the central bank, just as she does today by debiting her balance with a commercial bank.

An interest-bearing virtual currency may help counter the appeal of other private and official digital cash to India’s millennial savers. The federal and state governments will obtain financing for a part of their chronic budget deficits — which have ballooned after the pandemic — directly from households. They can do so even now by scooping up postal and other small savings. But those borrowings are more expensive than what it costs to raise funds in the bond market. Without guaranteed recourse to cheap and sticky current and savings account balances, banks will have to work harder to earn a return on equity.

Perhaps the central bank doesn’t have any of these objectives in mind, and it’s giving retail investors direct access to the bond market only to protect its turf from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the securities regulator. Whatever the motivation, once it gets off the ground, the RBI should consider Retail Direct as a prototype for digital cash, and allow experimentation in a supervised environment. It’s an idea that could go far.

(This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services. He previously was a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He has also worked for the Straits Times, ET NOW and Bloomberg News.)

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Early identification of stress, capitalisation augur well for banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Somasekhar Vemuri, Senior Director, CRISIL Ratings

Banks have improved the granularity of their loan books by focusing more on retail asset classes and reducing potential asset-quality shocks due to defaults by large entities. The share of medium and large industries in non-food credit of banks fell from ~40% in fiscal 2012 to ~27% in fiscal 2020, while that of personal loans rose from 18% to 28%.

While granular loans to retail borrowers and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) can result in elevated stress during the pandemic, given the unprecedented impact on household incomes and small businesses, policy mitigations announced would limit the impact to some extent.

Rama Patel, Director, CRISIL Ratings
Rama Patel, Director, CRISIL Ratings

Crucially, measures such as moratorium on loans, relief in interest on interest, one-time debt restructuring, and emergency credit line guarantee schemes have thrown many a lifeline to businesses and households. They also helped banks, especially those with diversified portfolios, thwart significant slippages.

The other major reason for systemic resilience is capital infusion. Public sector banks (PSBs) have raised ~Rs 3.4 lakh crore of equity in the past five years, bulk of it from the government.

That has shored up systemic capital adequacy ratio to 14.7% last fiscal and further to 15.8% as of September 2020 – almost on a par with advanced economies such as the US (15.9%) and South Korea (15.3%). Private sector banks are in a better position, reflected in their capital adequacy ratio of 16.7%, compared with 13.1% for PSBs as of March 2020.

To be sure, NPAs would rise in the pandemic aftermath and necessitate high capitalisation levels.

Robust capitalisation facilitates timely recognition and quick resolution of pandemic-related stress and faster recovery of credit growth. The different trajectories of banking systems in the US and the euro area after the GFC demonstrate this. Higher recapitalisation of US banks compared with the euro area enabled faster resolution of stress and facilitated quicker recovery of credit growth after the GFC in the US.

While it is natural for credit growth to be muted during a crisis due to lower demand and risk aversion, it is important that the pace improves once uncertainty abates and demand returns.

There are two reasons for this. One, bank credit growth significantly influences the growth trajectory of a developing country like India where credit to the private non-financial sector is underpenetrated at ~58% of GDP, compared with over 150% in the US, euro area, South Korea or even China.

Two, it is an essential condition for banking system resilience. Banks need to grow and diversify their loan books to enhance profitability that, in turn, is the key to building capital buffers against future risks and growth. Profitability can be sustained only through credit growth, backed by robust risk management and appropriate pricing.

As the pandemic-related stress continues to unfold, the improved resilience of Indian banks will be tested. A continued focus on shoring up capital to withstand asset-quality pressures will pave the way for credit growth as recovery gathers pace.

Click here to read all ETBFSI blogs.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ICRA: Negative rating actions in Mar-Dec ’20 exceeded historical 5-year average

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Rating agency ICRA on Wednesday said negative rating actions undertaken by it in the March to December 2020 period exceeded the historical five-year average.

About 13 per cent of the portfolio experienced a rating downgrade compared to the previous five-year average of 9 per cent, it said. Further, as many as 15 sectors, including aviation, hospitality, residential real estate, retail, and commercial vehicles, have a negative outlook in the near to medium term.

“The credit quality of India Inc has experienced rapid changes since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic and the imposition of the nationwide lockdown in March 2020. Business health has been bruised in general and some entities in select sectors have been badly hurt, even though the effects have not been apocalyptic, and the worst-case scenarios have not played out,” ICRA said in a statement.

Also read: PSBs may require up to ₹43,000 cr in FY22: ICRA

According to K Ravichandran, Deputy Chief Rating Officer, ICRA, another 9 per cent of the rated entities witnessed a change in outlook — from Stable to Negative or from Positive to Stable.

“Without the various fiscal and monetary interventions which provided a liquidity relief to the borrowers, the negative rating actions could have been higher,” he said, adding that textiles, real estate and construction were the top three sectors in terms of the count of downgrades.

Besides, aviation and hospitality sectors too witnessed a number of negative rating actions.

In terms of upgrades, only 3 per cent of the rated entities were upgraded in the past 10-month period, compared to the previous five-year average of 9 per cent.

The outlook on sectors including ferrous and non-ferrous metals and textiles has been revised from Negative to Stable following the uptrend in prices and expectations of healthy revenue and profit over the medium term, it said, adding that the outlook on cement, passenger vehicles and auto ancillaries has been revised from Negative to Stable.

“ICRA expects the credit quality pressures to remain elevated in general over the near to medium term; however, the intensity is likely to remain quite varied across sectors,” said Ravichandran.

Also read: ICRA Ratings expects pressure on logistics sector in near term

The instances of defaults have been much lower in the past 10 months due to the benefit of the loan moratorium, the agency said, adding that there were only 30 defaults across the rating spectrum compared with 81 in the corresponding previous period.

It also noted that compared to its earlier expectations of about 6-8 per cent of the borrowers at the system-level to get their loans restructured, only a handful of entities in ICRA’s portfolio had applied for loan restructuring.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘We have not sold a single loan to any ARC’

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The turnaround for YES Bank has been much faster as it could usually take at least two to three years, believes Prashant Kumar, Managing Director and CEO, YES Bank. In an interview with BusinessLine, Kumar said the bank is hoping to continue with the growth in advances in the fourth quarter with good demand from retail and MSME segments. Edited excerpts:

How has the bank managed such a robust growth in net interest income?

Some of the recovery has been booked as interest income, which has given a boost to the NII. This robust growth in NII will continue but it will depend on whether you will make recovery for interest. This may not happen in all the cases; normally there is always a haircut.

How is the growth in advances?

We had set a target of ₹10,000 crore of disbursements in the third quarter for retail and MSMEs and we disbursed ₹12,000 crore. Corporate disbursements were at ₹2,000 crore. We are seeing demand from the retail and MSME segments but corporate demand is yet to pick up.

We were earlier lending to large project finance companies on the corporate side but we are not doing that as a strategy now as we don’t have that kind of size of balance sheet. But we will definitely participate in working capital requirement and small requirement of term loans like ₹300 crore on the corporate side but not very large. Aviation, hospitality and real estate have been impacted badly by the pandemic as well as sectors related to entertainment, and shopping malls.

For the fourth quarter, we have not kept a target on advances but would like to do the same as the third quarter.

Also read: This is the peak in terms of NPAs and slippages: YES Bank chief

How have operating expenses come down?

We are avoiding wasteful expenses. Due to the pandemic, we realised people can work from home. In our Mumbai building, we have vacated two floors from 12 floors and will be in a position to vacate another two floors in the coming months. Similarly, in Delhi, we have shifted our premises from Chanakyapuri and are moving to Noida.

So, will the bank go for branch expansion?

In terms of business growth, we need to expand the branch network. Till now, our branches have been concentrated largely in northern and western India. Our presence in southern, eastern and central India is very small. We need to wait for two to three quarters but we are coming out with a strategy of opening branches in the areas where we are not there. Branch expansion will be a part of the strategy but we need to wait and see the real impact of the pandemic.

Also read: YES Bank posts Q3 net of ₹151 crore

What about deposit mobilisation?

Growth on deposits is always a slow process. Earlier, YES Bank’s deposit was at ₹2-lakh crore plus. But at that time, there was a very large deposit book of the government, which has come down. Some States are not placing deposits with private sector banks and we are also not getting deposits from the Central government. The government deposit book was ₹45,000 crore but now it is only at ₹7,000 crore to ₹8,000 crore. On retail and corporate deposit book, we are back on track. Our focus will be to open CASA accounts.

What is happening on the bad bank proposal? Are you looking to sell off any NPAs?

We are waiting for regulatory approvals. We have not sold a single loan to any ARC (asset reconstruction company) and we have no plans. If we are able to set up our own ARC, then we will transfer it to our own ARC. Selling doesn’t make any sense, it brings in hardly 20 per cent. We are able to recover much more.

What are your expectations from the Budget?

Real estate has been impacted by Covid-19 and has been under difficulties in the last three to four years. Addressing this sector is important as a large number of people are also impacted. People are paying EMIs but not getting their flats. This sector, if taken care, will give a boost to infrastructure. Banks would be able to recover their loans and the government will also get huge taxes. Also, hopefully the Budget will continue to provide support to MSMEs. It has a big role in the GDP and needs support in terms of releasing payments, protection, and ease of doing business.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s GDP is within the striking distance of attaining positive growth, the Reserve Bank said observing that the letter “V” in the V-shaped recovery stands for vaccine. The Indian government launched the world’s biggest vaccination drive on January 16 to protect people from COVID-19.

“What will 2021 look like? The shape of the recovery will be V-shaped after all and the ‘V’ stands for vaccine,” said an article on the ‘state of economy’ in the RBI‘s January Bulletin.

India has launched the biggest vaccination drive in the world, backed by its comparative advantage of having the largest vaccine manufacturing capacity in the world and a rich experience of mass inoculation drives against polio and measles.

“If successful, it will tilt the balance of risks upwards,” said the authors who among others include RBI Deputy Governor Michael Debabrata Patra.

The RBI, however, said the views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the central bank.

E-commerce and digital technologies will likely be the bright spots in India’s recovery in a world in which there will be rebounds for sure, but pre-pandemic levels of output and employment are a long way off, they said.

The article further said: “Recent shifts in the macroeconomic landscape have brightened the outlook, with GDP in striking distance of attaining positive territory and inflation easing closer to the target.”

India’s GDP is estimated to contract by a record 7.7 per cent during 2020-21 as the COVID-19 pandemic severely hit the key manufacturing and services segments, as per government projections released earlier this month.

The economy contracted by a massive 23.9 per cent in the first quarter and 7.5 per cent in the second quarter on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The article further said that in the first half of 2021-22, GDP growth will benefit from statistical support and is likely to be mostly consumption-driven.

With rabi sowing surpassing the normal acreage way before the end of the season, bumper agriculture production is expected in 2021.

“India being the global capital for vaccine manufacturing, pharmaceuticals exports are expected to receive a big impetus with the start of vaccination drives globally. Agricultural exports remain resilient and under the recent production linked (PLI) scheme, food processing industry has been accorded priority,” it said.

Harnessing the synergies by transforming low-value semi-processed agri products through food processing would not only improve productivity but also boost India’s competitiveness, it added.

The article notes that slippage ratios have been falling and loan recoveries are improving even as provisioning coverage ratios have risen above 70 per cent. Capital infusion and innovative ways of dealing with loan delinquencies will occupy policy attention in order to ensure that finance greases the wheels of growth on a durable basis before the demographic dividend slips away.

“It will take years for the economy to mend and heal, but innovative approaches can convert the pandemic into opportunities. Will the Union Budget 2021-22 be the game-changer?,” it said.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman is scheduled to present the Union Budget in Lok Sabha on February 1.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Open to look at proposal for setting up bad bank: RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is open to looking at any proposal for setting up a bad bank, according to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das.

“A bad bank has been under discussion for a very long time. We have regulatory guidelines for Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs). If any proposal (for setting up a bad bank) comes, we are open to examining it and issuing required regulatory guidelines,” Das said in an interaction with participants after delivering the Nani Palkhivala Memorial Lecture.

 

The Governor emphasised that it is for the government and other private sector players to really plan for the bad bank.

“As far as RBI is concerned, we try to keep our regulatory framework in sync with the requirement of the times. If there is a proposal for setting up a bad bank, RBI will examine and take a view on that,” Das said.

Also read: Bad bank should have been set up 3-4 years back, not now: Kotak Securities report

The Economic Survey 2016-17 had suggested setting up of a centralised Public Sector Asset Rehabilitation Agency (PARA) to take charge of the largest, most difficult cases, and make politically tough decisions to reduce debt. But no steps have been initiated so far to set up PARA.

Later, in 2018, the Sunil Mehta committee had recommended an Asset Management Company-led resolution approach for loans over ₹500 crore. This proposal too, has remained only on paper.

The need to set up a bad bank assumes importance in the context of macro stress tests for credit risks conducted by RBI showing that the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) may increase from 7.5 per cent in September 2020 to 13.5 per cent by September 2021 under the baseline scenario.

If the macro economic environment deteriorates, the ratio may escalate to 14.8 per cent under the severe stress scenario. These projections are indicative of the possible economic impairment latent in banks’ portfolios, according to RBI’s latest Financial Stability Report (FSR).

In his lecture, the Governor noted that the current Covid-19 pandemic-related shock will place greater pressure on the balance sheets of banks in terms of non-performing assets, leading to erosion of capital.

“Building buffers and raising capital by banks – both in the public and private sectors – will be crucial not only to ensure credit flow but also to build resilience in the financial system. We have advised all banks, large non-deposit taking NBFCs (non-banking finance companies) and all deposit-taking NBFCs to assess the impact of Covid-19 on their balance sheets, asset quality, liquidity, profitability and capital adequacy, and work out possible mitigation measures, including capital planning, capital raising, and contingency liquidity planning, among others,” he said.

Prudently, a few large public sector banks (PSBs) and major private sector banks (PVBs) have already raised capital, and some have plans to raise further resources taking advantage of benign financial conditions. He emphasised that this process needs to be put on the fast track.

Also read: RBI FSR: Bad loans can rise to 13.5% by Septemberas regulatory reliefs are rolled back

Das observed that the integrity and quality of governance are key to good health and robustness of banks and NBFCs.

“Recent events in our rapidly evolving financial landscape have led to increasing scrutiny of the role of promoters, major shareholders and senior management vis-à-vis the role of the Board. The RBI is constantly focussed on strengthening the related regulations and deepening its supervision of financial entities…Some more measures on improving governance in banks and NBFCs are in the pipeline,” he said.

Capital inflows

While abundant capital inflows have been largely driven by accommodative global liquidity conditions and India’s optimistic medium-term growth outlook, domestic financial markets must remain prepared for sudden stops and reversals, should the global risk aversion factors take hold, said Das.

Under uncertain global economic environment, emerging market economies (EMEs) typically remain at the receiving end, he added.

“In order to mitigate global spillovers, they have no recourse but to build their own forex reserve buffers, even though at the cost of being included in the list of currency manipulators or monitoring list of the US Treasury. I feel that this aspect needs greater understanding on both sides, so that EMEs can actively use policy tools to overcome the capital flow-related challenges,” Das said.

The Reserve Bank is closely monitoring both global headwinds and tailwinds while assessing the domestic macro economic situation and its resilience.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bad bank should have been set up 3-4 years back, not now: Kotak Securities report

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Establishing a bad bank today would aggregate but not serve the purpose that has been observed in other markets, Kotak Securities Ltd (KSL) said in a report.

Bad bank is perhaps well served in the initial leg of the loan recognition cycle, it added.

“While we are unaware of its probability and design, creation of a bad bank would have been most fruitful three-four years back (perhaps just after the Asset Quality Review) or earlier when the stress was just building up and banks were looking to delay recognition for various reasons.

“Today, the banking system is relatively more solid with slippages declining in the corporate segment for the past two years and high NPL (non-performing loan) coverage ratios, which enable faster resolution,” said KSL analysts M B Mahesh, Nischint Chawathe, Abhijeet Sakhare, Ashlesh Sonje and Dipanjan Ghosh.

Also read: Kotak Securities launches start-up investment and engagement programme

Based on insights gained from two key reports of BIS and IMF, the report observed that a successful bad bank needs a critical mass (healthy buy-in from lenders) of impaired assets, robust legal framework for debt resolution, along with strong commitment to reforms.

The analysts observed that segregation of impaired assets without sufficient recapitalisation has insignificant impact on future loan growth and NPL creation. A bad bank is expensive to establish, needs a well-defined mandate, and clear exit strategy.

Further, timing of formation and pricing of assets are crucial as the objective is to release stress from lenders early in the cycle so that they can refocus efforts in creating credit. Finally, there are instances of bad banks not achieving their desired objective, the analysts said.

After nearly a decade of elevated slippages, FY2019-20 saw a much lower slippage trend with evidence of it moving closer to normalisation before the impact caused by Covid-19, the report said.

The analysts said they are yet to assess the impact of Covid-19 but in their view the corporate portfolio appears to be holding quite well.

Also read: Rate of decline in fresh lending and deposit rates slows down: Report

Public sector undertaking (PSU) banks PSU, in particular, have gone through this with fresh equity (about ₹3.5-lakh crore over FY2016-21 by the government/Life Insurance Corporation of India) in the past three years and provision coverage ratio (PCR) improving to about 70 per cent from about 40 per cent in the past three-four years.

“A high coverage ratio ensures that faster consensus building is also no longer an issue. We have seen the introduction of IBC as well as consolidation in public banks. We had limited systemic risk from a liability perspective,” the analysts said.

The report observed that one of the key objectives of segregating impaired loans is to restore faith in bank balance sheets and help unlock funding market access. However, PSU banks control a large part of the banking system with a high contribution to NPLs.

“Managerial incentives across organisations are probably still fully not aligned to maximising value through early recognition of bad loans,” the analysts opined.

Also read: Kotak Securities launches platform for buying US equities

Further, given the high contribution of retail deposits, funding stability of these banks is uncorrelated with their financial performance for an extensive period of time.

The analysts said lack of credit growth, especially in the corporate segment, is often attributed to PSU banks’ risk aversion (low capital/high NPLs in the past).

“However, we do argue that corporate deleveraging has been quite slow and credit demand, especially by the better-rated and large wholesale borrowers, has been slower,” they added.

The behaviour of PSU banks has been different with respect to retail and micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME) lending, as these banks have been helping credit growth, especially in recent years and much higher than trend levels post the Covid-19 outbreak.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lower non-Covid health claims silver lining for general insurers

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Faced with muted growth in premium and high Covid claims, general insurance companies are hopeful that lower number of non-Covid related health insurance claims as well as the falling Covid cases will help them improve their balance sheets.

According to data with the General Insurance Council, 8.03 lakh Covid related claims amounting to ₹12,184.09 crore were filed by January 11, 2021. Of this, 6.26 lakh cases worth ₹6,109.81 crore had been settled while 1.77 lakh claims are pending.

“Health claims are still under control and are being offset by lower number of non-Covid claims,” noted an executive with a general insurance company, pointing out that many people are still postponing elective surgeries.”

‘Still manageable’

“Covid related claims were becoming a bit worrying for the industry. But since a large number of elective surgeries are getting postponed, it has helped to offset the loss. Otherwise, it would have gone beyond control but retail claims are still manageable,” he noted.

Also read: Ayushman Bharat crosses 1.5-cr mark in hospital admissions as non-Covid-19 treatments resume

According to industry estimates, about 15 per cent of Covid patients require hospitalisation and intensive medical care and file claims. The average claim amount is estimated at about ₹1.5 lakh.

“Typically natural catastrophes are built into projections but something like a pandemic is usually not factored in. Right now there is a decline in cases but the concern is about a second and third wave as is being seen in many European countries,” noted another insurer, adding that a large number of patients are also being advised home quarantine.

More clarity will be available in coming weeks as many of the listed general insurers start to report their third quarter results.

Also read: Strong winds of change set to sweep health insurance sector

Meanwhile, non-life insurers registered 2.7 per cent premium growth in November 2020 but there are concerns about softening in health insurance premium. According to GIC data, health insurance premium grew by 12.96 per cent between April and November this year.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Health insurance purchases rise by about 50% during Covid-19: ICICI Lombard survey

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Health insurance purchases have risen by about 50 per cent during the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic than previously, especially amongst younger people, according to a recent survey by ICICI Lombard General Insurance.

“The prime motivation to buy health insurance is to cover the expenses during an emergency. Covid-19 and the fear of job loss have motivated respondents to buy health insurance in the last six months across cities,” revealed the survey titled Evolution of Health Insurance – A Covid-19 Perspective and #RestartRight.

Recent industry data has also shown a sharp rise in the demand for health insurance with sales between April and November registering a near 13 per cent growth.

Also read: Life insurers may sell indemnity based heath cover soon; IRDAI forms panel

While 60 per cent of the respondents had purchased health cover more than a year back, as many as 27 per cent had bought it in the last six months to one year, and 14 per cent had bought it in the last six months.

It also found that demand has increased significantly amongst the younger population due to concerns over the pandemic while for the middle age group, tax benefit is also one of the major motivations.

Tax benefit was the key focus for 51 per cent of the respondents in the age group of 31 to 35 years and 44 per cent of those surveyed between 36 and 40 years. In contrast, Covid-19 was the prime focus for 30 per cent of those purchasing health insurance in the age group of 25 to 30 years.

A total of 1,922 interviews were conducted for the survey, which took place between October 30, 2020 and November 10, 2020. This included 1,548 owners of health insurance policies and 374 persons who did not have health cover.

Significantly, it also found that persons who didn’t have a health cover resumed fewer activities post relaxation of the lockdown compared to insured persons.

While 78 per cent of the overall respondents had resumed grocery shopping, in other categories of activities like going to the office, dining out and consultation with a doctor, people with health cover were more active.

The survey also found that there has not been much change in the type of policy and preference behaviour post the pandemic, with 54 per cent of the respondents purchasing individual policies and 46 per cent buying family floaters.

As many as 74 per cent of the respondents who had purchased health insurance wanted to enhance the sum assured or coverage. The average health coverage is ₹5 lakh, which is expected to increase to an average of ₹8.9 lakh.

Also read: State insurance schemes have failed the poor: Report

Following the pandemic, customers across cities have become more independent and have started purchasing health insurance through websites and mobile apps.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SFBs should focus on bottomlines to withstand adverse shocks: RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Small Finance Banks (SFBs) may need to focus on their bottomlines as and when financial conditions tighten, according to a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) report.

The “Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India 2019-20” observed that the prevailing easy liquidity conditions facilitate borrowings and refinance on which SFBs rely. Currently, there are 10 SFBs in the country.

The central bank said the risk absorption cushions in the form of provision coverage ratio (PCR) is low in some SFBs, impacting their ability to withstand adverse shocks.

The report said those SFBs, which were earlier NBFC micro finance institutions (NBFC-MFIs), continue to have significant exposure to unsecured advances even as they strive to diversify their portfolio.

Green shoots in the form of revival of agriculture and allied activities may augur well for financials of these banks, it added.

The RBI noted that collection efficiency of these banks had dropped substantially during the strict lockdown period but since then there is a strong improvement on a month-to-month basis and a catch-up with pre-pandemic levels may, in fact, be under way.

In FY20, SFBs deposits jumped 48.1 per cent year-on-year (y-o-y) to ₹82,488 crore. Their loans and advances rose 29.7 per cent y-o-y to ₹90,576 crore. Investments were up 40 per cent y-o-y to ₹24,203 crore.

The RBI observed that these banks have smaller low-cost current and saving account (CASA) deposit bases.

SFBs were set up in 2016 to provide basic banking services such as accepting deposits and lending to the unserved and the under-served sections of society, including small businesses, marginal farmers, micro and small industries, and the unorganised sector.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 16 17 18 19