Surge in non-Covid health cover claims, average ticket size: ICICI Lombard CEO

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In a breather to non-life insurance companies, Covid-related health insurance claims have dropped with the ebbing of the second wave of the pandemic.

However, there has been a rise in non-Covid-related health claims and their average ticket size has risen significantly, said Bhargav Dasgupta, Managing Director and CEO, ICICI Lombard General Insurance. If this trend continues, it could impact health insurance premium.

Average ticket size

According to Dasgupta, the insurer has seen a 20 per cent increase in the average ticket size of these claims over two years, from 2019-20 to now, which is about 10 per cent compounded growth.

“As Covid claims have come down, the frequency of non-Covid health claims has gone up. Some of the other infectious diseases have spiked this year such as malaria, chikungunya and dengue. Also, there was some amount of backlog of the elective surgeries that have now caught up in this quarter,” he said in an interview with BusinessLine, adding that the ticket size of claims has gone up for similar ailments.

“We’ll have to see if it’s a temporary increase or permanent in nature. This could perhaps be because of additional RT-PCR tests that hospitals have do or some more procedures that they’re following, but hopefully that will stabilise,” he said, adding that if healthcare costs continue to increase at the level they are going up it could start impacting the premium for customers.

Dasgupta said that the insurer increased pricing on its corporate health portfolio, but is on the wait-and-watch mode on retail health insurance.

“On the retail side, we have to go back to the IRDAI and seek price increase. As of now, we’ve not done that. This is just one quarter data; we want to wait for this fiscal and see the data and then decide. We are not using the Covid spike to ask for a price increase because that would not be fair on customers,” he stressed.

Between April and September 2021, the insurer received 72,059 Covid-related health claims and 2,38,409 claims for non-Covid cases.

Dasgupta, however, continues to be confident about growth prospects, and said there is a structural increase in the demand for health insurance.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Life insurance sees good growth, claims fall post second wave

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The life insurance industry is slowly coming back to normal after facing a high claim burden in the first five months of the current fiscal following the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.

“The industry is doing well. With every passing month, business is improving. Private sector life insurance companies are doing well and public sector bank-led banca companies are doing especially well,” said Rushabh Gandhi, Deputy CEO, IndiaFirst Life Insurance.

In an interaction with BusinessLine, Gandhi said there are green shoots across the industry as well as for the insurers and there continues to be strong demand amongst consumers for life insurance.

“A large part of our portfolio is non-participating products; the contribution of protection business is growing. Quotations for term life are increasing. It is a visible and sustainable trend,” he noted. Claims, which shot up by nearly two to three times in the second wave of the pandemic compared to the first wave, have also come down for life insurers, he further said.

“In the first five months of the year, claims have been very high. Peak deaths happened in May and intimations came in June and July; now it seems to be easing,” he added.

Burdened by high claims, a number of life insurers have reported losses for the first quarter of the fiscal and have also been increasing premium rates.

According to IRDAI data, life insurance companies registered a 22.21 per cent growth in first year premium in September on a year on year basis. Of this, private sector companies registered a growth of 42.42 per cent while LIC recorded a growth of 11.55 per cent last month on an annual basis. IndiaFirst Life Insurance grew by 71.05 per cent in September.

Comeback

Analysts too expect the life insurance sector to continue to stage a full comeback in the second half of the fiscal.

“We have seen a healthy pick-up in growth in the past few months, with September 2021 witnessing healthy trends across most players. We believe premium growth would see strong traction over FY22, with continued focus on non-participating, annuity, while ULIP would see gradual recovery,” said Motilal Oswal in a recent report.

Care Ratings said that while Covid claims are likely to remain elevated in the second quarter, the impact should be minimised compared to the first quarter.

“In the first quarter of the fiscal, the growth in premiums, albeit muted, was driven by unit-linked products and protection plans. However, the life insurance sector witnessed significant claims in the first quarter due to the second wave of the pandemic and profitability suffered as companies made provisions and reserves to alleviate the impact of the claims,” it said.

Growth strategies

Commenting on growth strategies for IndiaFirst Life Insurance, Gandhi said the insurer has been focussing on credit life insurance and expects premium of about ₹300 crore from the segment this year.

“We have managed in our partnership with Bank of Baroda to get attachment rates of over 70 per cent and have started doing covers for all loan products,” he said, adding that the insurer is working on tie ups with a number of other lenders as well.

“Our strategy remains intact. We will remain a multi-channel distribution company with bancassurance as our main focus and contributing 80-85 per cent of premium. On agency, our focus will be on quality not quantity, while on banca our focus will remain on penetration,” he further said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HC judge appoints retired judge to settle claims made by depositors, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Madras High Court has appointed Justice N Kirubakaran, a retired judge of the High Court, as Commissioner to take over the entire affairs relating to settlement of claims made by the depositors, who were allegedly cheated by the Ambattur Nadargal Dharma Paripalana Sangam here.

The Commissioner shall cause public notice within a week in two vernacular dailies calling upon persons, who had invested amounts in the petitioners fund to file necessary formal applications along with proof of such deposit and after verification of the said claims, shall settle the amounts due to the depositors.

Justice M Dhandapani made the appointment while granting anticipatory bail to two admins of the Sangam, who apprehended arrest following complaints from the investors.

“Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the affidavit filed by the petitioners stating that they would settle the amount due to the victims and abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court, to give a quietus to the entire issue and also to have the matter settled so that all the depositors, who have invested money in the fund are not deprived of their hard earned money, in the interest of justice, is inclined to appoint a retired judge of this Court as Commissioner to settle the deposits between the depositors and the petitioners,” the judge said.

The entire exercise of receiving the claims, scrutinising and settling the same shall be completed within three months.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HC to liquidator, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Panaji: The high court of Bombay at Goa has directed the liquidator of Madgaum Urban Co-operative Bank S V Naik to take necessary steps expeditiously to provide relief to depositors from Curtorim, Macazanna, St Jose de Areal, Raia and others.

“The liquidator will have to pursue the matter with Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC), so that at least depositors maintaining balance of less than Rs 5 lakh receive the amount up to Rs 5 lakh, in terms of the insurance scheme. Even the depositors maintaining a deposit of above Rs 5 lakh will be entitled to receive the amounts up to Rs 5 lakh under the scheme,” the court held.

“The liquidator should process all such claims as expeditiously as possible so that there is no undue delay in the matter,” stated the division bench comprising Chief Justice of the Bombay high court Dipankar Datta and Justice Mahesh Sonak.

The residents from Curtorim and neighbouring villages in Salcete, in a letter to the high court in September last year, stated that almost 8,000 account holders mostly agriculturists, fishermen, tenants and labourers had deposited their hard-earned earnings in the bank, which had now gone into liquidation.

They stated that they were not being permitted to withdraw any amount over Rs 5,000 from their bank accounts in terms of directives dated May 3, 2019 issued by the RBI and highlighted the immense difficulties faced by them, particularly during Covid-19 pandemic on account of being unable to access their bank accounts.

During the pendency of the petition, the limit for withdrawal was enhanced from Rs 5,000 to Rs 30,000 and on January 19, the high court directing RBI to consider whether the limit could be further enhanced to Rs 50,000 since Adv C A Coutinho, the counsel for the bank, submitted that the grievances of no less than 49,500 depositors from out of a total of 58,000 depositors would be redressed with the enhancement of such limit.

Assistant general manager of RBI, Sandra Rodrigues submitted to the high court on August 17 that in the present situation, where an order of liquidation or winding up of an insured bank has been made, every depositor in respect of his deposit in the bank shall be entitled to receive up to Rs.5 lakh from in accordance with the provisions of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961.

The court was told that almost 55,999 depositors had deposits of less than Rs 5 lakh with the bank and such depositors would therefore be entitled to receive amounts up to Rs 5 lakh from DICGC. This would leave about 636 depositors having a deposit of over Rs 5 lakh.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Shriram Life Insurance eyes 15-20% growth

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Private sector Shriram Life Insurance, which has been focussing on rural markets, is hoping to grow by 15-20 per cent on an annual basis.

“The expectation is that the life insurance industry will grow by about 15 per cent or so for the next number of years. So we hope to grow slightly faster than that — maybe between 15 per cent and 20 per cent per year,” said Casparus Kromhout, Managing Director and CEO, Shriram Life Insurance.

While the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic has raised further uncertainties on the economic outlook, Kromhout said the life insurer has been putting a lot of things in place for supporting its existing channels. It has also been working on innovation and creating new business models.

Net profit

The life insurer registered a threefold increase in its net profit to ₹106 crore in 2020-21.

“The first quarter of last fiscal was very difficult for everyone. But we ended the year with new business premium growth of 25 per cent,” he told BusinessLine in an interaction, pointing out that a large part of the company’s customer base is from rural areas and was impacted by the pandemic.

“When the first lockdown came last year, we were very worried because our customer base was impacted by both the medical emergency and loss of income. We thought that the business would really suffer and customers wouldn’t be able to pay their premiums or buy insurance. Fortunately, we were able to come back in the second half of the year,” he said.

In 2020-21, about 47 per cent of its new business and 54 per cent of claims came from the rural segment.

Its average premium size is about ₹17,400 while the average industry premium size is around ₹50,000.

The rural areas have been quite severely impacted in the second wave of the pandemic, he said adding there has been an uptick in Covid related claims in April and May this year. He, however, said the company is well prepared to meet the rising claims.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

LIC further relaxes claim settlement process

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Amidst the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic surging across the country, Life Insurance Corporation of India has further relaxed processes for settlement of claims.

To facilitate speedy settlement of death claims in the prevailing situation where death has occurred in a hospital, LIC will accept alternate proofs of death instead of a death certificate issued by the municipal authorities.

Alternate proofs of death would include death certificate, discharge summary or death summary containing clear date and time of death issued by the government, ESI, Armed Forces or corporate hospitals and counter-signed by LIC class I officers or Development Officers of 10 years standing along with the cremation or burial certificate or authentic identifying receipt issued by the relevant authority.

“In other cases, Municipal Death Certificate will be required as earlier,” LIC said in a statement on Friday.

Life certificates

For Annuities with return of capital options, production of life certificates is waived for annuities due up to October 21 this year, it further said.

LIC would also accept life certificates sent through email in other cases and has introduced life certificate procurement through video call process.

To address the difficulties experienced by policyholders in submitting documents required for claim settlement in servicing branch, submission of documents has been allowed in any nearby LIC office.

LIC further said that starting May 10, all its offices will work from Monday to Friday between 10 am and 5:30 pm. Saturdays will be a public holiday for LIC.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Covid-related health cover claims up 50%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Covid-related health insurance claims have again risen steeply over last one month, according to general and health insurers.

The total registered claims now stand at about ₹14,287 crore as per data compiled by the General Insurance Council for the industry. Out of this, claims worth ₹7,561 crore have so far been settled by the general and standalone health insurers.

This is much higher than the earlier estimate which pegged the Covid claims for the present financial year at about ₹10,000- crore to ₹12,500 crore.

Though the increase in the number of claims differ from company to company, on an average, the industry is witnessing about 50 per cent surge in claims, say industry sources.

“There has been a substantial increase in the number of Covid-related health claims,’’ Rakesh Jain, ED & CEO, Reliance General Insurance, told BusinessLine.

Rising cases

“The claims reported at RGI rose to 36.2 per cent (proportionate) in March compared to February and January and we also noticed a steep increase in the number of cases in February and March,’’ Jain said. In comparison with the number of claims in the January-February period, there has been an almost 50 per cent increase in Covid-related health insurance claims being reported, said Bhaskar Nerurkar, Head – Health Claims, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance.

The increase in claims is obviously driven by spurt in the number of fresh cases, say insurers.

“On an average the number of Covid cases per day increased from 15,620 to 29,377 in March 2021,’’ said Jain.

The spatial distribution of claims also point to emerging clusters of Covid cases.

“If one looks at the origin of claims, they come from relatively new locations/cities such as Nagpur, Indore, Vadodara and Amaravati,’’ Nerurkar said.

Claim settlement

Given the magnitude of claims, insurers have also put in place special measures for speedy settlement. For instance, RGI launched ‘Self I’ app immediately after the pandemic for ease of claim intimations for the customer.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance has an in-house claim settlement team dedicated for Covid-19 claims. “We earmarked a few resources to settle Covid-19 claims on priority. This helped us settle Covid-19 claims faster,’’ said Nerurkar.

According to chief of underwriting of a major general insurer, a few cases of fraudulent claims were also reported. “There has been a significant increase in the number of home-care treatment for Covid,’’ he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

New health insurance guidelines and what they mean for you

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In the recent past, insurance regulator IRDAI came out with standardised, customer-friendly guidelines for health insurance policies. These changes are implemented from October 1, 2020 and are largely expected to benefit the policyholders. Here’s more :

 

Definition of pre-existing diseases

One of the important amendments is the change in the definition of pre-existing diseases (PED) in health policies. This is because the old version had ambiguity in terms of what constitutes a pre-existing disease. Also, all conditions for which the person had signs/symptoms in the 48 months before taking the policy were considered PED.

IRDAI has changed this definition and has offered more clarity. As per the new definition, pre-existing disease means any condition, ailment, injury or illness that has been diagnosed by a physician/doctor within 48 months prior to the effective date of the policy issued by the insurer or its reinstatement; Or for which medical advice or treatment was recommended by, or received from, a physician within 48 months prior to the effective date of the policy or its reinstatement.

Changes in proportionate deductions

Liability of a health insurer is limited to the extent specified in the policy, and these are termed as sub-limits. The sub-limits are applicable mostly in cases such as room rent for hospitalisation, ICU, OPD (out-patient department) and ambulance cover. So, if you exceed the limit prescribed, the extra amount has to be paid from your pocket. That is, based on the type of room you occupy at the hospital, the cost of associate medical expenses also changes.

Higher room cost would mean the cost of associate medical expenses will also be higher. For instance, due to an emergency, assume someone is hospitalised in a room with a rent of ₹6,000 per day (while it a ₹4,000 a day limit in his policy). This increase of ₹2,000 in room rent will be applicable proportionately on associate medical expenses as well, such as doctor’s fees and nursing charges (in the ratio of room rent eligible to actual room rent). So, if the proportionate increase in medical expenses works out to ₹80,000 and the total hospital bill works out to ₹3 lakh, then the insurer will settle ₹2.2 lakh.

So to standardise the claim settlement in health policies, the regulator has established that associate medical expenses – the cost of pharmacy, consumables, implants, medical devices and diagnostics – cannot be subject to the proportionate clause. Insurers are not allowed to apply proportional deductions on ICU charges as well.

On claims

Health policies, sometimes, get rejected on the grounds of non-disclosure of medical issues (by mistake) even though the policyholders would have paid the premium for an extended period. This is because, during the issuance of a policy, many are not aware of certain pre-existing conditions, on the grounds of which the insurers reject claims later. Therefore, the regulator has ruled that health insurers cannot contest claims, citing non-disclosure, by clients who have continued with their policies for eight years. That is, after the expiry of moratorium period (the period of eight years during which the policyholders have continuously renewed their policy) no health claim shall be contestable, except for proven fraud and permanent exclusions specified in the policy contract. Policies would, however, be subject to all limits, sub-limits, co-payments, and deductibles based on the policy contract.

Other major changes

Generally, people with serious illnesses such as Alzheimer’s and epilepsy were not given coverage at all under a health policy previously. Insurers now have to provide individuals with such diseases, coverage for at least other diseases (specifying pre-existing conditions such as Alzheimer’s and epilepsy as permanent exclusions).

Also, the scope of coverage of health insurance policy is widened to provide cover for various illness including behaviour and neuro development disorders, genetic diseases and disorders and cover for puberty and menopause-related disorder. This was previously not covered by all insurers. Modern treatments too will be covered by a health policy including deep brain simulation, oral chemotherapy, robotic surgeries and stem cell therapy.

Waiting period (time period an insured has to wait before the insurer provides coverages) related to a specific disease has been standardised as well. While the standard waiting period is for 30 days, the disease-specific waiting period varies with each insurer, usually 2-4 years; for older policies, it went to over four years as well. The regulator has said that disease-specific waiting period cannot exceed four years. Similarly, the waiting period for lifestyle-related illnesses such as hypertension, diabetes and cardiac conditions cannot exceed 90 days.

Now, policyholders can pay their health insurance premiums in instalment in addition to lump-sum payments. Another change is that insurers have been advised to allow claim settlement for telemedicine consultation.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY