Jim Rogers, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Investment guru Jim Rogers says central banks globally would come to the market rescue if things go downhill from here on.

Rogers said when things start shaking for a while, central bankers panic and they would do anything they can to save the bubble, the bull market and prosperity.

“If something causes the markets to go down, whether there is a new virus or whatever, central bankers would get scared and they would do something to save us all,” Rogers said while answering a question.

In an interview with ET NOW, Rogers said stocks like Amazon and Google are wildly expensive in the US market. He said stocks such as Samsung and certain Japanese stocks go up every day and could be in a bubble, but not everything.

“I am not selling yet because I can see there are a lot of stocks that have still not skyrocketed. When everything skyrockets, then you know we are very close to the top and then maybe I should get out,” Rogers said.

Rogers said when things get overpriced, inexperienced people enter the market, leading to a bubble.

Lastly, he said the best trade for next year could be agriculture.

“Sugar is still down 70 per from its all time high, that is not a bubble. When anything is down 70 per cent from its all time high, that is certainly not overpriced. Now maybe my timing is wrong, but I still prefer agriculture to nearly anything.,” he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

All that is dubious about crypto currencies

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


It is quite timely that the government and regulators are looking closely at cryptocurrency. The interesting part is that it does not come under SCRA and hence SEBI is not involved. It does not involve financial institutions and hence RBI is out. It has not been declared illegal by the Courts and hence the government cannot do anything as of now. It is a unique fad because it is prevalent across the world and more importantly it trades without there being any underlying value.

Crypto is a creation of the imagination which is protected by technology and brought on to several platforms which enables trading. Anyone can start their own crypto, but multitude of people need to believe in it and start trading. Not surprisingly even though there are over 7,000 such currencies not more than 10 are actively traded and command value. Clearly lots of people have tried floating their imaginary currencies and have failed. It runs on belief and trust with no regulators to lay down the rules.

Two things stand out here which needs to be answered by regulators.

First, is whether it is being used as a mode of transaction. Currently there is no information if people are buying and selling property and paying partly in crypto currency. If such things are happening, then it is something the RBI should be concerned about, because we cannot have parallel currencies in the country. It is illegal to carry out transactions in foreign currency in India and while barter exists in some pockets it is not the rule. If a crypto is allowed to become a currency for transactions, then it will undermine monetary policy and the entire system of payments will go for a toss. And finally in case there is a crash in value, the investors will lose money for which there is no recourse.

Also, there is need to know more on how these transactions take place. There are exchanges which allow one to trade; and it is still unclear whether the transactions are in rupees and remain in this currency or get converted to dollars. If it is in rupees and mimics what happens to the crypto globally then it is not serious, but if there are conversions into dollars then there would be a FEMA rule to contend with.

The exchanges which promote trading in crypto are transparent in terms of doing a KYC of all players. This aspect needs to be clear because if there is conversion into dollars at any stage it needs to be within the guidelines put by the RBI.

Investment option

The second aspect is the investment option. If cryptos are being used as an investment option by people, then the nature of debate changes. The exchanges vouch that there is KYC done for every customer and that all taxes are paid on the gains. It is still not clear if the gains come under short or long term and the I-T Department will have to decide on this issue.

The broader issue is that if one can trade in imaginary currencies it does tantamount to gambling which is partly permitted in the country. Horse racing and the bets that go along with this avocation is legitimate as are lotteries. Casinos can operate in some States. If trading in cryptos fall in this category, then as an extension it can be argued that people should be allowed to gamble on cricket matches too and there should be a level playing field.

Therefore, there is need to do a deep dive analysis into this entire issue of crypto currency as the level of interest is high and increasing. Part of the reason is that people want to make quick money and the present avenues of savings — bank deposits which give a paltry return — makes these alternatives alluring. Allowing such investments also risks savings getting diverted for speculative purposes which is not good for an economy which normally has a big gap in savings and investments.

Besides people investing should know what they are up against. SEBI runs strong campaigns along with the stock exchanges to caution investors on trading as well as investing in mutual funds which all have ‘underlying’ products like shares, commodities or bonds. For something fictional, people need to know what they are up against, because when there is a crash there can be an issue. The price of bitcoin had risen from $8,527 on March 1, 2020 to a high of $62,986 on April 15, 2021 and then fell to $30,822 on July 20, 2021. It again crossed $67,000 on November 9. Intuitively it can be seen that there would be several gainers and losers in this game and those who are in the latter category could be the ones who have been lured by the lucre.

Threat for central banks

Globally this has become a wave which cannot be stopped. Some states in the US accept bitcoins for transactions as do some of the Nordic countries. It is not a good precedent for central banks which will see their power over monetary policy getting denuded. Interestingly, the concept of crypto emerged on the premise that central banks and governments mismanage money and make them worthless with loose policies. This made the concept of bitcoin enticing driving its popularity.

The fear of a backlash at some point of time is palpable and this concept can be likened to a Frankenstein which may be hard to push back once it grows roots in the system. Ideally a call should be taken for sure to make it illegal for transactions as this strikes the edifice of not just the financial system but also monetary policy. On whether it should be allowed as a form of gambling, there can be further debate.

The government need not be concerned over people who are aware of the downside of cryptos, but the less financially literate need to be educated just as it is done for sin products. Maybe a bold print saying ‘trading in crypto can be bad for your financial health’ can be the beginning.

The writer is an independent economist and author of: Hits & Misses: The Indian Banking Story. Views expressed are personal

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Deutsche Bank CEO calls on central banks to fight inflation, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Central bankers must change course to fight accelerating inflation, Deutsche Bank Chief Executive Officer Christian Sewing said on Monday.

Sewing, speaking at a banking conference, said he didn’t share the opinion of central bankers that inflation increases were temporary.

“I think monetary policy must take countermeasures here – and sooner rather than later,” Sewing said.

“The supposed panacea of recent years – low interest rates with seemingly stable prices – has lost its effect, and now we are struggling with the side effects,” he said.

(Reporting by Tom Sims and Frank Siebelt Editing by Paul Carrel)

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Kamath, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As the cryptocurrency craze keeps on growing around the world, Nikhil Kamath, Co-founder of Zerodha and True Beacon, has a piece of advice for the crypto-crazy millennials: it’s okay to diversify your portfolio, but don’t put in anything beyond 1-5 per cent of your net worth in it.

A battle between the central banks and private cryptocurrencies has been brewing for some time and now it seems we are getting closer to a climax,” said Kamath, the co-founder of India’s largest stock trading platform by volume.

“Developments in China and some of the other parts of the world show that to some extent, cryptos do take away powers from central banks and governments. So they are bound to fight back,.and when they come out and try to regulate it and change it in one way or another, it will be interesting to see what happens and which side wins,” he said.

The 35-year-old fintech disruptor says he would put his money on the side of central banks and the governments not allowing cryptos to thrive beyond a certain extent.

Kamath says one should not have too much allocation to any one asset class, and crypto is a fairly volatile asset class. “If one is looking to diversify one’s portfolio, then it’s okay to invest 1-2-5 per cent of one’s net worth in cryptos. But do so only after understanding what it entails,” he said.

On Wednesday, the global crypto market cap stood at $1.89 trillion, down 3.65 per cent from the previous day, amid choppy trading. The total crypto market volume over the last 24 hours stood at $97.32 billion, down 14.64 per cent.

Beijing last Friday issued a blanket ban on all crypto trading and mining and cryptocurrency exchanges and providers of crypto services are since scrambling to sever business ties with mainland Chinese clients. Ten powerful Chinese government bodies, including the central bank, said overseas exchanges are barred from providing services to mainland investors via the internet — a previously grey area -z and vowed to jointly root out “illegal” cryptocurrency activities.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Central banks parse inflation risk as turn from pandemic policy begins

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Central banks that launched massive emergency support to fight the pandemic last year are now planning a global turn in the other direction, with gaps already emerging in their perceived risk of inflation, the need to respond to it, and the pace of the likely return to normal monetary policy.

They are confronted with common supply shocks and common risks around a pandemic that continues to shape commerce.

“Globally, we are still in for a long process,” of reopening and adapting to the post-pandemic economy, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said this week in a Reuters interview.

But the reopening, and particularly the associated inflation, is being felt differently across the developed world, testing officials’ understanding of the post-pandemic economy and their ability to hit a shared 2 per cent inflation target without derailing global growth.

The heads of the world’s four major central banks gather for a mostly virtual European Central Bank forum on Wednesday, and if last year was marked by a uniform rush to stave-off the worst, their exit strategies are already diverging.

That’s led to major policy scuffling both in Europe and the United States over how much inflation risk central banks should tolerate as they try to make up for sluggish prices in the years since the Great Recession a decade ago – a major gamble, ineffect, over whether the post-pandemic world will work the same as before.

Policy divergence among the world’s major central banks can influence markets worldwide, shifting capital flows, exchange rates and trade patterns. There may even be limits on how far a central bank like the Fed might go in normalising policy or raising interest rates if major partners like the ECB aren’t moving in the same direction.

It is still early in the transition from the pandemic, but differences are already emerging.

“The key challenge is to ensure that we do not overreact to transitory supply shocks,” ECB President Christine Lagarde said at her bank’s premier research conference on Tuesday, and policy “must remain focused on steering the economy safely out of thepandemic emergency” rather than squelching any short-term increase in prices.

Like the ECB, the Fed is also banking on inflation easing largely on its own. But discussion of the risks has become more prominent, and in projections last week virtually all Fed officials said it was more likely inflation would run hotter than expected than otherwise.

Even as Lagarde spoke, Fed Chair Jerome Powell testified to the US Congress about “bottlenecks, hiring difficulties, andother constraints” that have led the Fed to project inflation this year at 4.2 per cent, twice the official target, and may make it more persistent.

Cost-of-living Crisis?

The potential problems are manifold. The pandemic still rages, and while businesses and consumers have adapted to a large degree, it still shapes who is showing up for work, what goods and services get produced, and how fast those goods are moved around the planet and how smoothly those services are delivered.

Workers are moving back into jobs, but more slowly in many places than anticipated. The supply shocks that began with the first coronavirus shutdowns in 2020 continue to reverberate,whether in the form of fuel shortages in the UK, German autoplants waiting for computer chips, US factories lacking industrial goods, backlogged shipping routes, or rising prices.

The Fed last week said it was nearing its first steps to wind down the emergency bond-buying launched in March of 2020, and half of US policymakers at their most recent meeting now say interest rates may need to increase next year.

For the Bank of England, the tipping point may already be in view, with markets expecting a rate increase no later than February, and yearly price increases of 4 per cent beginning to show inpublic opinion.

“Talk of a ‘cost of living’ crisis is gaining traction …and the public may be looking at the BoE to lean against inflation risks coming out of the pandemic,” Deutsche Bank economist Sanjay Raja wrote in a note to clients on Friday.

Japan’s core consumer inflation index, by contrast, remained flat in August, indicating that country’s decades-long battle with weak prices continues. Wholesale prices are rising, pushed by global commodities inflation, but growth is weak and Bank of Japan policy expected to remain loose.

The ECB has downplayed any post-pandemic policy shift.

Bond-buying through its Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme will decline under the legislation that authorised it. But the bank is expected to expand other programmes to partly compensate, with Lagarde arguing inflation remaining below the 2 per cent target is a bigger risk than prices soaring persistently above it.

Looking back on the last decade it’s a natural concern.

By 2012, all the major central banks had fixed 2 per cent as their preferred inflation target, then proceeded to persistently run short of it through a decade of sluggish growth.

The policy bias is now to err on the other side – and to hope the world co-operates.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Raghuram Rajan, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The onus of promoting sustainable investments should lie with governments and not central banks, which already have significant other policy commitments, said Raghuram Rajan, former Reserve Bank of India governor.

Central banks should steer clear of politically-driven unlegislated areas such as “green” investments, as their mandates of providing financial and monetary stability are already quite wide, Rajan told the Reuters Global Markets Forum on Wednesday.

“Asking the central bank to say you should buy only green bonds, not brown bonds, etc., is asking the central bank to impose its own views on something which is primarily a fiscal matter,” he said.

Rajan, who earlier served as chief economist for the International Monetary Fund, said central banks should instead turn their focus to the financial stability of these green investments and other threats such as crypto currencies and cyber security.

Crypto currencies have a “potential future,” particularly well-regulated stablecoins, Rajan said, but it wasn’t clear what fundamentals were backing their valuations other than a “heady environment,” with easy monetary policy fuelling all asset prices.

Cryptos won’t be “your last resort” in a doomsday scenario, he said. “I would be much more confident about the value of these cryptos once they find proper use cases,” such as an effective means of payment, especially in cross-border transactions.

ON TRACK
Rajan, who is professor of finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, did not expect markets to react in a 2013-style “taper tantrum” as the U.S. Federal Reserve unveils its plan to withdraw stimulus, which he said was unlikely to happen at Jackson Hole on Friday.

“Ideally, the Fed would like to observe as long as possible, (and) … make sure that the economy is well on track towards growth, he said. “Of course, the problem is the Delta variant, plus whatever variants are lurking in the background.”

He expected inflationary pressures in the United States to be transitory, but said prices may remain elevated for longer than expected due to strong wages, unavailability of workers, and additional fiscal stimulus measures.

“Firms are feeling confident enough to pass through price increase … they don’t do that until they think that these higher prices are to stay,” Rajan said.

Referring to India, Rajan said inflation there could rise in the short term as pent-up demand takes hold, resulting in supply-side bottlenecks, but demand will fall over the medium-term due to stressed households and economic scarring from the pandemic.

Central banks in many emerging countries are being proactive and raising interest rates, Rajan said.

“Now, obviously, the RBI (Reserve Bank of India) is watching the data and it will make the decision when it when it has to make it.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Global boom in house prices becomes a dilemma for central banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Surging house prices across much of the globe are emerging as a key test for central banks’ ability to rein in their crisis support.

Withdrawing stimulus too slowly risks inflating real estate further and worsening financial stability concerns in the longer term. Pulling back too hard means unsettling markets and sending property prices lower, threatening the economic recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic.

With memories of the global financial crisis that was triggered by a housing bust still fresh in policy makers minds, how to keep a grip on soaring house prices is a dilemma in the forefront of deliberations as recovering growth sees some central banks discuss slowing asset purchases and even raising interest rates.

Federal Reserve officials who favor tapering their bond buying program have cited rising house prices as one reason to do so. In particular, they are looking hard at the Fed’s purchases of mortgage backed securities, which some worry are stoking housing demand in an already hot market.

In the coming week, central bankers in New Zealand, South Korea and Canada meet to set policy, with soaring home prices in each spurring pressure to do something to keep homes affordable for regular workers.

New Zealand policy makers are battling the hottest property market in the world, according to the Bloomberg Economics global bubble ranking. The central bank, which meets Wednesday, has been given another tool to tackle the issue, and its projections for the official cash rate show it starting to rise in the second half of 2022.

Facing criticism for its role in stoking housing prices, Canada’s central bank has been among the first from advanced economies to shift to a less expansionary policy, with another round of tapering expected at a policy decision also on Wednesday.

The Bank of Korea last month warned that real estate is “significantly overpriced” and the burden of household debt repayment is growing. But a worsening virus outbreak may be a more pressing concern at Thursday’s policy meeting in Seoul.

In its biggest strategic rethink since the creation of the euro, the European Central Bank this month raised its inflation target and in a nod to housing pressures, officials will start considering owner-occupied housing costs in their supplementary measures of inflation.

The Bank of England last month indicated unease about the U.K. housing market. Norges Bank is another authority to have signaled it’s worried about the effect of ultra-low rates on the housing market and the risk of a build-up of financial imbalances.

The Bank for International Settlements used its annual report released last month to warn that house prices had risen more steeply during the pandemic than fundamentals would suggest, increasing the sector’s vulnerability if borrowing costs rise.

While the unwinding of pandemic-era is support is expected to be gradual for most central banks, how to do so without hurting mortgage holders will be a key challenge, according to Kazuo Momma, who used to be in charge of monetary policy at the Bank of Japan.

“Monetary policy is a blunt tool,” said Momma, who now works as an economist at Mizuho Research Institute. “If it is used for some specific purposes like restraining housing market activities, that could lead to other problems like overkilling the economic recovery.”

But not acting carries other risks. Analysis by Bloomberg Economics shows that housing markets are already exhibiting 2008 style bubble warnings, stoking warnings of financial imbalances and deepening inequality.

New Zealand, Canada and Sweden rank as the world’s frothiest housing markets, based on the key indicators used in the Bloomberg Economics dashboard focused on member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The U.K. and the U.S. are also near the top of the risk rankings.

Global boom in house prices becomes a dilemma for central banks
As many economies still grapple with the virus or slow loan growth, central bankers may look for alternatives to interest-rate hikes such as changes to loan-to-value limits or risk weighting of mortgages — so called macro-prudential policy.

Yet such measures aren’t guaranteed to succeed because other dynamics like inadequate supply or government tax policies are important variables for housing too. And while ever cheap money is gushing from central banks, such measures are likely to struggle to rein in prices.

“The best approach would be to stop the further expansion of central bank balance sheets,” according to Gunther Schnabl of Leipzig University, who is an expert on international monetary systems. “As a second step, interest rates could be increased in a very slow and diligent manner over a long time period.”

Another possibility is that house prices reach a natural plateau. U.K. house prices, for example, fell for the first time in five months in June, a sign that the property market may have lost momentum as a tax incentive was due to come to an end.

There’s no sign of that in the U.S. though, where demand for homes remains strong despite record-high prices. Pending home sales increased across all U.S. regions in May, with the Northeast and West posting the largest gains.

While navigating the housing boom won’t be easy for central banks, it may not be too late to ward off the next crisis. Owner-occupy demand versus speculative buying remains a strong driver of growth. Banks aren’t showing signs of the kind of loose lending that preceded the global financial crisis, according to James Pomeroy, a global economist at HSBC Holdings Plc.

“If house prices are rising due to a shift in supply versus demand, which the pandemic has created due to more remote working and people wanting more space, it may not trigger a crisis in the same way as previous housing booms,” said Pomeroy. “The problems may arise further down the line, with younger people priced out of the property ladder even more.”

As they tip toe away from their crisis settings, monetary authorities in economies with heavily indebted households will need to be especially careful, said Alicia Garcia Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis who used to work for the ECB and International Monetary Fund.

“Real estate prices, as with other asset prices, will continue to balloon as long as global liquidity remains so ample,” she said. “But the implications are much more severe than other asset prices as they affect households much more widely.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI should appoint statutory auditors for public sector banks: ICAI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The CA Institute has suggested that appointment of statutory central auditors (SCAs) of public sector banks should be done by the Reserve Bank of India and not by the bank managements.

The audit regulator is keen that the banks’ auditors be appointed on the lines of Comptroller and Auditor General of India appointing public sector entities’ auditors.

“We have suggested that RBI itself should appoint the statutory auditors of public sector banks. The current system of bank managements appointing statutory auditors should be done away with,” Nihar Jambusaria, President, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), told BusinessLine. This suggestion was conveyed to the central bank at a recent virtual interaction between the top brass of the CA Institute and senior RBI officials.

Also, the ICAI has made several suggestions on the RBI’s April 27 circular that prescribed norms for appointment of Statutory Central Auditors/Statutory Auditors in PSBs and statutory auditors for urban cooperative banks, non-banking finance companies and housing finance companies.

‘Minimum numbers’

Jambusaria said that CA Institute has suggested to the RBI that instead of prescribing the maximum number of SCAs in public sector banks, the RBI should set the the minimum numbers to be appointed. “We have suggested that instead of having a cap, there should be a minimum number and the current absence of minimum number is leading to reduction in overall number of auditors in PSBs,” he said.

Selection committee

It maybe recalled that bank managements have been appointing SCAs since 2008-09. However during 2011–14, the appointment was done by a Selection Committee comprising representatives of CAG, Ministry of Finance and IBA on a points-based system.

‘Not for deferring norms’

Asked to comment on corporate India’s recent suggestion to RBI that the entire new norms of the central bank be deferred by at least two years, Jambusaria said that ICAI is not in favour of such deferment. He also said that ICAI does not have any objections to making the concept of joint audits mandatory for banks and NBFCs with asset size of over ₹15,000 crore.

“Except for few changes which we have brought to the notice of RBI for consideration, we are happy with most of the norms in the central bank circular,” he said.

ICAI is also understood to have pitched for the reintroduction of compulsory three-year cooling off period after the completion of a SCAs tenure.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

HODL your horses, cryptos face possible hurdles ahead, experts say, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Evolving rules, environmental concerns and competition from central banks threaten to undermine many of the world’s fast-growing crypto assets, crypto and macro experts said, while creating opportunities for those able to adapt.

Europe and the United States are both working on regulating digital assets and their providers – moves welcomed by investors, who hope the new ground rules will encourage institutional investors to plunge in.

Anatoly Crachilov, co-founder and CEO of Nickel Digital Asset Management, which manages assets worth $200 million, told the Reuters Global Markets Forum that regulatory uncertainty was a drag on the development of the crypto space.

He described the promise by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission‘s new Chairman Gary Gensler, to provide “guidance and clarity” to the market during his confirmation hearing in March, as a turning point.

For its part the European Commission‘s proposed “Markets in Crypto-assets,” or MiCA regulation, will regulate crypto-assets and their service providers in the European Union.

“It will be a new banking sector, with passporting possibilities,” digital asset trading solutions company H-Finance CEO Vytautas Zabulis said, referring to the prospect of EU-wide cryptocurrency trading licences.

Alongside the evolving regulatory framework, some countries, including China, Britain and Russia, are considering launching their own central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

That is likely to be followed by legislation to tax gains, said Robert Carnell, chief economist and head of research at ING Asia. “That may be the death knell for these other cryptocurrencies, though central bank coins are on the up and up,” he said.

Zabulis said that if CBDCs were developed in a way that they were “easy to interact with,” most digital currencies used for settlements will likely lose their both their goal and value.

There was not a big argument for bitcoin becoming a settlement tool, Zabulis cautioned. “Blockchain technology is for that, so, CBDCs will be built on blockchain.”

Bitcoin BTC=BTSP traded around $54,000 following a 10% surge on Monday, driven by reports that JPMorgan Chase JPM.N is planning to offer a managed bitcoin fund.

CBDCs are expected to have a limited impact on Bitcoin in particular, due to its progressively limited supply, which is in contrast to traditional fiat systems, Crachilov said.

“No central bank currency, however digital, can offer scarcity at this stage, as its supply can be inflated by a respective central bank issuing entity,” Crachilov said.

If China saw bitcoin as a threat to its own planned digital currency, that could affect the whole industry, Zabulis said.

GREEN REVOLUTION?
Creating crypto assets leaves a heavy carbon footprint, and is being increasingly seen as environmentally unsustainable.

ING Asia’s Carnell said there was “a strong argument on environmental grounds for limiting crypto mining, or at least having them offset their wasteful practices.”

However, bitcoin enthusiast Raoul Pal said he was not worried about the “unsustainability narrative”.

Pal, founder and CEO of on-demand financial TV channel Real Vision, said he believed it would drive a “green revolution” because in the end that was “the only way to win”.

Nickel Digital’s Crachilov said his fund was seeing a higher demand for ESG-compliant cryptos. “The price competition drives miners towards the cheapest sources of energy — renewables are increasingly falling into this category,” he said.

Ethereum 2 will use “proof of stake versus proof of work,” H-Finance’s Zabulis said. “It means that it will drastically reduce the energy needed” to mine it.

Garrett Minks, chief technology officer at Delaware-based RAIR Technologies, said the idea is to “trade brute force electricity burning with fancier math”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY