Govt. to disinvest two public sector banks & one public general insurance company, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman in her Budget 2021 speech has announced the disinvestment of two public sector banks and one general insurance company.

She said, “In spite of COVID-19, we have kept working towards strategic disinvestment. A number of transactions namely BPCL, Air India, Shipping Corporation of India, Container Corporation of India, IDBI Bank, BEML, Pawan Hans, Neelachal Ispat Nigam limited among others would be completed in 2021-22. Other than IDBI Bank, we propose to take up the privatization of two Public Sector Banks and one General Insurance company in the year 2021-22. This would require legislative amendments and I propose to introduce the amendments in this Session itself.”

PNB’s MD & CEO, CH S. S. Mallikarjuna Rao is also of the opinion that divestment of 2 PSU Banks and 1 public insurer is in the right direction. He said, “The move to strategically divest 2 Public Sector Banks and 1 general insurance company, are steps in the right direction.”

Padmaja Chunduru, MD & CEO of Indian Bank said, “Stake sale by government in public sector companies and financial institutions, including 2 PSBs and one insurance company, in the next fiscal year is a welcome move.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IBA CEO, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Sunil Mehta, Chief Executive Officer of Indian Banks‘ Association believes the budget is an excellent budget especially looking at the present setup circumstances where everybody was looking at the funding of the revenue through increase in personal taxation, corporate taxation and wealth tax but nothing of that sort has been announced in the budget. The investment push that has been made in the infrastructure and health sector is something that is really going to help and was one of the major needs of the country and our finance ministry has very aptly completed this task.

Mehta said, “The impact of AMCs and ARC, let me tell you that this proposal was sent to the government by Indian Bank association so I can tell you the basis on which we have submitted the proposal and what we wanted out of this. The biggest challenge in the banking space is that if an Investor wants to invest in a particular fund or an asset then they’ll resort to 10-20 different banks who are part of that consortium and resolve that debt with them and onboard it. Sometimes when 20 banks sit together and they go into different mechanism, it gets difficult to reach a consensus for taking a proper treatment of the asset.”

He added, “The first and the foremost advantage that the national reconstruction company will provide is consolidation of the debt. The debt which is spread out in 10-20 different entities of the consortium or the multiple banking arrangement, it will be consolidated into one entity which will provide ease of resolution. In a multiple banking arrangement, there is always a difference of opinion which makes it difficult to reach a resolution plan. When a particular asset is transferred to an AMC, which has specialisation in the particular area and thus can take a more informed decision.”

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Government sets-up DFI looks to disburse Rs 5 lakh crore in three years, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The central government has announced setting up of a Development Finance Institutions to boost infrastructure financing.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said, “Infrastructure needs long term debt financing. A professionally managed Development Financial Institution is necessary to act as a provider, enabler and catalyst for infrastructure financing. Accordingly, I shall introduce a Bill to set up a DFI. I have provided a sum of `20,000 crores to capitalise this institution. The ambition is to have a lending portfolio of at least `5 lakh crores for this DFI in three years time.”

She added, “Debt Financing of InVITs and REITs by Foreign Portfolio Investors will be enabled by making suitable amendments in the relevant legislations. This will further ease access of finance to InVITS and REITs thus augmenting funds for infrastructure and real estate sectors.”

S Viswanatha Prasad, Founder and Managing Director- Caspian Debt said, “The setting up of a new DFI for providing infrastructure capital and leveraging it is a welcome move, however it should focus on providing capital only to the private sector and non-profits. Another DFI lending to Government entities will not create any differentiator.”

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Government to tackle stressed assets through ARC-AMC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Accept the updated privacy & cookie policy

Dear user,

ET BFSI privacy and cookie policy has been updated to align with the new data regulations in European Union. Please review and accept these changes below to continue using the website.

You can see our privacy policy & our cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure the best experience for you on our website.

If you choose to ignore this message, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on ET BFSI.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

‘Strengthen digital infrastructure & reduce long-term capital gains tax’, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Millennials have been the topic of many debates. Considered to be highly adaptive, Gen-Y prefers quick and easy ways to earn for living. And now, with the budget being just around the corner, they would be reaching out to the newspapers to find out what lies in store for them.

India is the second most populated country with 34% population of millennials. This energetic population seems to always search for opportunities to have some additional income or benefits over the current Income. And the lockdown gave these creative minds ample time to think and explore options to make extra… ETBFSI reached out to some millennials to understand their expectations from Budget 2021.

Twenty-four-year-old Saniya Khan, co-founder of a startup Brand Baba said, “The budget should continue to focus on Go Vocal for Local and give funds to enhance production within the boundaries. The budget should also promote the MSMEs by extending the credit facility.”

Since the paradigm has shifted to work from home model, Khan expects that the government might come out with measures to strengthen the digital infrastructure of the country.

Some millennials are looking for booster shots that can help solve the macro issues. Vishal Bhatia (29), said, “The government should increase the capital expenditure in infrastructure development. It should consider and reduce long-term Capital Gains Tax.”

One can’t imagine life with FMGS products, consumer durables and entertainment. Rohit Wadhwa who is a senior analyst at a private sector company said, “The government should reduce GST on everyday essentials, such as personal hygiene products, fuel, groceries and staples products, the government should also consider increasing the basic exemption limit for taxpayers.”

Millennials are also expecting the budget to boost the investment decisions. “Options given by the government under Sec 80C for reducing the taxable income should increase and the lock-in period to claim tax deduction under mutual funds should decrease,” shared Radhika Thokal.

The tech-friendly generation also expects a single digital platform for making all investment decisions, from managing bank accounts, to operating demat accounts and paying taxes.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Plan bad bank to whittle down and not transfer bad loans, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bad loans which were 7.5% in September 2020 threatens to exceed 13% by September 2021 due to large scale disruption caused by COVID-19. The gravity of the situation is expected to unfold and surface once the suspension of IBC is lifted and later when loans liberally restructured or advanced to pandemic stuck companies become due for repayment .

Evidently, status -quo is not sustainable any more. The recent measures for infusion of capital in Punjab and Sindh Bank through questionable means i.e. issuance of government bonds to the bank – interest free and on -hold to maturity basis without actual cash flow and against accounting norms -is a pointer towards emerging grim situation.

Many countries world wide including US, UK, Germany have in the past successfully set up bad banks particularly post the financial crisis of 2008 ,to hold and manage bad loans till the underlying assets are restored to health and / or disposed off or liquidated .Notable amongst these is City Holdings which successfully managed bad assets worth $800 billion hived off from City Bank .The objective of the bad bank is undoubtedly laudable and experience world wide reassuring . It however needs to be subjected to the test of realism in the Indian context.

Managing bad loans is a different ball game then lending. However, without recovery of loans, the lending has no meaning. Lending activity has to be seen as a value chain in continuum till outstanding loan is recovered and if found necessary, through take over and realisation of underlying assets or businesses. The banks therefore need to create requisite capacity to manage bad loans by themselves . A bad bank in the normal course would therefore be a moral hazard incentivising banks to continue with their indiscreet lending practices.

The Indian Bankers Association justified a bad bank amongst others for the reason of lingering fear of enquiries and investigations in the minds of bank officials for the commercial decIsions taken for restoration of viability or disposal of bad loans. This argument is preposterous as the bad bank sponsored by the government, Asset Management Company (AMC) and Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) setup as a public private partnership may not either be able to escape external scrutiny for public accountability. The banks should be made to assume rather than abdicate their responsibility for managing bad loans.

As a sound management practice, banks should set up a Strategic Business Unit (SBU) as part of its core functions, designed to segregate bad loans and ring fence resultant risks on the balance sheet to focus on management of loans at SMA 2 or NPA stage. The SBU should for the purpose have commensurate autonomy, organisation structure, system and processes. Through SBU set up in 2003 as a part of Internal restructuring Dresdner Bank AG ,Germany ,was able to successfully resolve €35 billion portfolio. In case of banks with high level of NPAs ,the government can consider giving on- balance guarantee to protect the bank from loss on bad portfolios.

Pandemic has however created extraordinary situation with crippling effect on the economy in general and on solvency and liquidity of industry – across the board, in particular. It is akin to a force majeure event – not caused by actions of banks or the borrowers. The banks in order to ensure their continuing viability of operations and ability to meet financing needs of the trade and industry post pandemic need to be freed of burden of NPAs through on balance sheet or off balance sheet structures with the government support.

The Bad bank should better be set up as spin-off i.e. disposing bad loans into a legally separated entity and not as a special purpose vehicle used to off -load bad loans. On balance sheet structures though desirable may not be as efficacious given the urgency to tame and deal with the NPAs caused by the pandemic.

Further it would be advisable that government instead of setting up one monolithic bad bank , should set separate bad bank for infrastructure loans and for other loans. This would enable focused approach considering economic significance and specialised skill set required in nurturing, disposal or liquidation of underlying assets. Different bad banks can then be weaved in to a holding company structure for better governance and uniform approach, in managing bad loans. Transfer of bad loans should be at fair value for reflecting true financial health, and not at book value as mooted in some quarters. It would be imprudent to Tweak or overrule, through legal or regulatory diktat, internationally accepted accounting norms in this regard.

The government instead of setting up one monolithic bad bank , should set separate bad bank for infrastructure loans and for other loans .This would enable focused approach considering economic significance and specialised skill set required in nurturing, disposal or liquidation of underlying assets. Different bad banks can then be weaved in to a holding company structure for better governance and uniform approach.

The bad bank may offer a viable alternative structure as an extraordinary and onetime measure .It should however be confined to bad loans caused by pandemic the principle followed for granting moratorium for repayment of loans or suspension of IBC post pandemic.

Care should also be taken that the bad bank does not become a mere instrument of transfer of bad loan from one balance sheet to another. Learning from international experience the bad bank need to be fully autonomous, professionally managed and have systems and processes which facilitate initiatives and outcome oriented actions in a fair and transparent manner. This is a tall requirement in Indian context .However if not addressed before launch, the bad bank may remain bad causing irreparable distress in future.

Dr. Ashok Haldia, Fmr MD & CEO, PFS


The blog has been authored by Dr. Ashok Haldia, Former MD & CEO, PFS.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETBFSI.com does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETBFSI.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Business correspondents seek rationalisation of GST, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Business Correspondents and companies working with them have sought rationalisation of GST, regulatory changes to ensure viability of the business correspondent business model.

Anand Kumar Bajaj, Founder MD & CEO at PayNearby says, “93% of our business correspondent network has been committed to working in tier 2 and tier 3 towns, serving as the sole point of cash disbursal in locations with limited financial infrastructure. However, the commission rates for BC services are very low to make it a profitable business. Additionally, BCs, by default, come under the 27% GST and 5% TDS on cash withdrawal even after the tax act having enabling provisions. This makes it difficult for them to stay afloat.”

Bajaj added, “We hope that this Budget takes into consideration the tough working condition of the BC network and make a few regulatory changes to ensure the viability of a community that has been vital to the cause of financial inclusion in the country.”

Spice Money founder, Dilip Modi said, “The earnings of the underbanked population are hit with taxes levied on basic money transfers. The government should consider providing some GST relief on smaller transactions conducted on the BC network. A special provision on GST and TDS for the BC model will help create visibility for this business.”

Modi noted, “The government showed support for the rural areas by deploying DBT schemes with the BC networks backing them by providing withdrawal services. The government should further this support by building BC networks as it will spell growth for the vision of Digital India beyond simple internet connectivity. It will allow more financial products and services to reach the remotest parts of India and accelerate the bridging of the gap in the access to banking services in India.”

The Business Correspondent Federation of India (BCFI) has also recommended the changes on the same lines around taxation structure.

Sunil Kulkarni, CEO and Head – BCFI said, “While urban banked customers are reaping the benefits of UPI and mobile banking services, the Business Correspondents (BC) Industry – the last mile in branchless banking, is hoping that the upcoming budget will implement the recommendation of RBI constituted “Report of High-Level Committee on Deepening of Digital Payments-May 2019” headed by Nandan Nilekani for under-banked urban/rural population by making BC originated and terminated transactions of IMPS and AEPS exempted from GST, which is currently levied at an effective rate of 27% on these customers.”

Kulkarni added, “Considering the business correspondent’s fraternity serves the lower bracket of the income pyramid, the tax bracket is very high. Additionally, for better penetration of financial services to the masses, BC’s should be permitted to offer products and services of more than one or two banks. The industry has already witnessed the critical role BC’s played during the pandemic lockdown by helping deliver banking and financial services to the last mile. We hope our concerns get highlighted and resolved with favourable policies during the budget announcement.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Three point-agenda for the upcoming Budget

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Union Budget 2021-22 will be one of the most anticipated events in recent history. As the dust is settling after the torrid health catastrophe that affected millions and which has threatened to leave a permanent emotional scar, we are finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. India has had a faster than expected economic recovery and a low fatality rate from Covid-19. The distribution of the vaccines has also commenced.

The policies that will be introduced in the upcoming Budget are expected to set the tone for what steps the government takes next, and how quickly India is able to shrug off the crisis. The priority of the government will likely be measures on policies which will lead to sustained growth, boost consumption and encourage private investments. The Budget emphasis will probably lay on healthcare and livelihood creating sectors such as infrastructure and housing.

Job creation

Focus on jobs could be one of the main agendas of the Budget. The pandemic and the resultant job losses in some sectors is expected to have far-reaching implications on the Indian economy. For that reforms in sectors that create large-scale employment, such as housing and real estate, infrastructure, construction and manufacturing, will be required.

According to India’s Economic Survey 2017-18, nearly 90 per cent of the workforce employed in the real estate sector are engaged in the construction of buildings. Further, the sector is expected to require over 66 million people by 2022.

Housing is one of the largest employment generators in the economy with linkages to nearly 300 industries – both in terms of direct jobs and the jobs it creates in ancillary industries such as cement, steel, power etc.

It has been rightly said: “Don’t worry too much about GDP growth, worry about jobs. If we focus on jobs, GDP will take care of itself.”

Focus on housing

The government and the regulators have recognised the critical role housing and real estate plays in the Indian economy. In recent years, affordable housing has been at the forefront. For a rapidly growing country like India with a large young population that needs more homes at affordable price points, the following incentives could be considered:

1) Interest deduction on housing loans could be raised from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The deduction could be reviewed on a periodic basis and linked to inflation.

2) The real estate sector has been facing challenges since 2017, and the demand for under-construction properties has slowed down significantly. Whilst SWAMIH (Special Window for Affordable & Mid-Income Housing Fund) is an excellent initiative, it is not practical for a single fund to resolve all the last mile funding issues.

Historically, some part of the funding for a project used to come from sale of under-construction properties. However, due to GST and other factors, the demand for under-construction properties has come down, resulting in projects that are 60-80 per cent complete, unable to receive last-mile funding.

Lenders are reluctant to lend to stressed projects as any fresh funding will be classified as a NPL on day one in the books of the new lender. The regulators may want to consider changing the regulations such that any secured fresh funding should be ring-fenced.

3) An additional option is to allow External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) for real estate projects. Further, investment by foreign owned/controlled SEBI regulated investment vehicles up to 100 per cent under automatic route should be permitted in entities that acquire completed and under-construction residential projects.

4) The Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (a component of PMAY) has been a major success. There is a need to extend PMAY benefits to more locations and extend the deadline for the Middle Income Group till March 2022.

5) There is a need to promote the rental market. Currently, the setoff and carry forward of losses from house property is restricted to ₹2 lakh. The earlier law which did not have such restrictions could be restored. Alternately, the limit should be increased to ₹5 lakh.

Personal tax reforms

Personal tax rates need to be further reduced. Surcharge on high taxpayers also needs to be rationalised as these are the people who have the capacity to spend the most and spur demand. Global data show that lower tax rates result in higher tax collections as compliance improves.

In fact, we just witnessed this example in Maharashtra when the State government lowered that stamp duty to 2 per cent for properties registered before December 31. Mumbai recorded historic registrations of house sale deeds in November and December.

As a result, the State government’s treasury collection from registrations increased, inferring that strong home sales have more than compensated for the lower stamp duty.

The Budget could also consider removing the long-term capital gains tax for investments in equity shares or by raising the period from one to two years. Additionally, doing away with taxing dividend income could be considered. Such steps will put more disposable income into the hands of the individual.

Continual reforms have been a priority for the current government. It is often said that India performs best in a crisis. The pandemic may just become a catalyst to bring in further reforms in ease of doing business, development, jobs, growth and a stable tax regime to ensure India’s sustained long term growth.

The writer is VC & CEO at HDFC Ltd

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Samiran Chakraborty, Citi, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


2021 could be a year when both the RBI and the government will have to plan for at least some amount of normalisation, says Samiran Chakraborty, Chief Economist (India), Citi in conversation with ET NOW.

Digitisation and work from home has changed fortunes of Indian IT sector in terms of availability and optimisation. When the real economy shapes up in the post Covid world, are these factors which could surprise us and create a lot of upside?
It is quite possible. It could work both ways. On the positive side, we have seen a significant improvement in profitability in the September quarter numbers for companies. Even if you adjust for factors like travel cost or advertisement and promotion costs or to some extent even wage cost, there still seems to be a residual element which could be attributed to productivity improvement.

On the other hand, because of all these physical distancing protocols to be maintained in different kinds of services and in some cases even may be in manufacturing, there is a decline in productivity which has led to somewhat higher prices — part of the reason why inflation has picked up during the Covid period. It is not just simply because of the lack of mobility issue but it could also be due to the fact that companies are being forced to abide by these physical distancing protocols leading to some productivity decline.

Both the things are working simultaneously but my sense is that over the next couple of quarters, looking at the productivity data and for wage cost, travel cost etc. we will have a much better sense of how much permanent improvement in productivity is contributing to this profitability.

We have got three important data points which are different. Bond yield is at a multi-year low, forex is at a multi-year high and rising fiscal deficit. We do not know how things will move in the Budget. How important are these three variables to judge the economy?
At least for the first two, there is a strong element of RBI intervention which is keeping those two variables where they are. Fiscal deficit is more in the control of the government to decide where they want to put it. Now while we are all discussing the nascent economic recovery, we have to keep in mind that this recovery is to some extent on the crutches of the fiscal and monetary stimulus and 2021 could be a year when both the RBI and the government will have to plan for at least some amount of normalisation.

It may not be done immediately but in the latter part of the year, normalisation will probably become a necessity and that is where these variables will start playing an important role in the economy. We are not thinking of any policy rate hikes in 2021 but to some extent surplus liquidity in the banking system might get normalised which means that rates in the system go up a little bit. So, the 10-year government bond yields can move up to about quarter over the course of the year. On the exchange rate side, the big dilemma is that because we are having a current account surplus or at least a much lower current account deficit and huge amount of capital inflows, there is a constant pressure on the currency to appreciate which the RBI does not want to do because we are simultaneously following a self-reliant India campaign and putting some sort of import curbs to promote domestic manufacturing.

If the RBI is intervening so much that it is creating surplus liquidity that will militate against the RBI bid to tighten liquidity at the latter part of the year, how RBI manages between the two is going to be very critical for 2021.

On fiscal deficit we think it is possible for the government to target about a 4.5% fiscal deficit in the Budget this year on the back of slightly lower than 7% fiscal deficit and GDP last year and that is possible by so much of expenditure compression. But if the economic growth is normalising, then the revenue side will improve on the tax revenue side while on the non-tax revenue side, a lot of divestment proposals which could not fructify in FY21 might be carried over to FY22 and help the FY22 revenue collection. 4.5% fiscal deficit and GDP in our view is quite possible for next year.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Centre mulls ‘bad bank’, PSB privatisation for Budget FY22, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, The Union Government is considering several policy measures for the Indian banking sector, including setting up of a bad bank and privatisation of few state-run banks.

A bad bank is a bank set up to buy the bad loans and other illiquid holdings of another financial institution. Even though a custodian for the stresssed assets has been provisioned for long, but, it has never materialised.

According to sources, there are talks of reducing the number of public sector banks (PSBs) to four from the current 12.

This is likely to be part of the government’s new strategic disinvestment policy, which is also likely to include the insurance sector.

This would be a major move towards meeting the government’s disinvestment targets.

The most significant feature of the upcoming policy would be the inclusion of financial sectors under its ambit.

Though privatisation is on the cards, further recapitalistion of PSBs cannot be ruled out. According to people in the know, the government may go ahead with another round of recapitalisation, to enable the banks create a strong buffer amid the pandemic.

Last year, the Niti Aayog suggested the privatisation of three banks – the Punjab & Sind Bank, UCO Bank and the Bank of Maharashtra, according to people in the know.

Further, the talks of stake sale in banks under the new policy, came after the merger of 10 public sector banks came into effect on April 1, 2020.

With the merger coming into effect, India currently has 12 public sector banks, down from 27 in 2017.

During the announcement of the Aatmanirbhar Bharat economic package in May last year, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had said that the Centre will come up with a new Public Sector Enterprise Policy, and open up all sectors to the private sector.

She had said that under the new policy, a list of strategic sectors requiring presence of PSEs in public interest will be notified and in these sectors, at least one enterprise will remain in the public sector and the private sector will also be allowed.

In the Union Budget for FY21, the government had set a disinvestment target of Rs 2.1 lakh crore. The target has, however, been described as ambitious by many as the Centre was not able to reach anywhere near its target in the last fiscal.

The already lagging disinvestment plans have been severely impacted by the ongoing pandemic.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3