Covid resurgence will force RBI to keep the monetary tap open, bond market shows, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Central banks around the world sure have their work cut out. Just when monetary authorities were preparing the ground for a reversal of ultra-loose policies adopted in response to the coronavirus crisis, the virus, it seems, has taken new and potentially more dangerous avatars.

From bracing for interest rates in major economies to head northward sooner than later, global bond markets on Thursday took a 360-degree turn.

With a new and possibly even more deadly variant of the coronavirus being detected in South Africa, Botswana and Hong Kong, a fresh outbreak of the disease may well be on the cards. When this is coupled with a recent resurgence of Covid-19 in Europe — which has been accompanied by attendant restrictions on activity — the risk to global growth has intensified significantly.

The price action in global bond markets on Thursday showed this. Instead of getting ready for imminent policy normalisation, the bond markets seemed to be expressing the view that monetary accommodation would stay for a while longer. Yields on 10-year US Treasury papers nosedived a whopping 12 basis points on Thursday and were last at 1.51 per cent.

Clearly, investors are betting on the helping hand of central bank interventions to return.

THE INDIAN STORY
Indian sovereign bonds on Thursday enjoyed their best day in three-and-a-half weeks, with yield on the 10-year benchmark 6.10 per cent 2031 paper dropping four basis points.

Prior to the detection of the fresh variant in South Africa, a strong view in the market was that the Reserve Bank of India would start the process of raising interest rates at its next policy statement, on December 8, by raising the reverse repo rate and, therefore, narrowing the width of the liquidity adjustment facility corridor.

The central bank has already paved the way for the step as the quantum of funds withdrawn and the cutoff rates set at variable rate reverse repo operations has pushed rates on money market instruments closer to the repo rate of 4 per cent rather than the reverse repo rate of 3.35 per cent.

However, even as money markets may have aligned to the new expectation of the reverse repo rate, the act of raising it would itself have significant implications – namely that the ultra-loose accommodation is now well and truly going to be reversed. Because one would hardly expect the central bank to reverse its stance once it has officially started the process of lifting interest rates.

Now, however, market players are betting that there is a strong possibility that Governor Shaktikanta Das will keep all rates on hold and say that the central bank wishes to obtain more clarity on the global situation (and the spillovers for India) before raising any benchmark rates.

For India, another salutary impact of the new risk to global growth is a decline in international crude oil prices. Even as the government has reduced excise duty on petroleum products, the extent of the rise in oil prices over the last couple of months had emerged as a significant risk to domestic inflation, while worsening the outlook on the trade deficit.

Crude oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange slumped 3 per cent on Thursday, while Brent crude, the global benchmark, shed 2.2 per cent.

“The market’s view is changing; that is clearly perceptible from today’s move,” ICICI Securities Primary Dealership’s head of trading and executive vice-president Naveen Singh said. “There was almost a consensus that the reverse repo will be hiked, especially as market rates have aligned to a higher rate. But now there is a view that the RBI will maintain the status quo and wait for more details about whatever is happening in Africa and Europe. Because they cannot hike and then cut again if Covid were to worsen.”

While the yield on the 10-year benchmark bond may face hurdles when it comes to falling below the psychologically significant 6.30 per cent mark, for now, traders do not see it revisiting the 6.40 per cent mark, where it was hovering around a couple of weeks ago.

Hardening inflation can take a backseat for now, bond traders seem to be saying. The spotlight has once again squarely turned on protecting economic growth from what seems to be a hydra-like disease – two new heads sprout whenever one is severed.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Rupee, government bonds gain as mkts cheer sharp decline in CPI inflation, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The rupee gained against the US dollar in early trade Wednesday because of a sharp decline in Consumer Price Index-based inflation for September and as global crude oil prices retreated from multi-year highs, dealers said.

The domestic currency on Wednesday opened at 75.3150 to a dollar, stronger than 75.5060 per dollar on Tuesday. At 10:20 hours (IST), the local unit traded at 75.2675 per dollar.

Data released after trading hours on Tuesday showed that India’s headline retail inflation declined sharply to 4.35 per cent in September versus 5.30 per cent in August.

While domestic retail inflation has been softening over the past couple of months, a recent jump in global crude oil prices had led to fears of fresh upside risks to inflation.

Crude oil prices have climbed to multi-year highs since last week due to concerns of global demand outstripping supply.

Comfortingly for local currency traders, Brent crude futures declined on Tuesday, with the contract for December delivery shedding $0.23 to close at $83.42 per barrel.

“There is a pull-back in crude oil prices which is providing support but the larger positive is the sharp decline in inflation,” a dealer with a large private bank said on condition of anonymity.

“After the kind of depreciation we have seen this month, there is also some dollar selling by foreign banks for exporters. Because they want to lock in a good level. 75.50/$1 was breached yesterday but it is unlikely that RBI will let it go to 76/$1 very soon,” he said.

The rupee has shed around 1.5 per cent against the US dollar so far this month.

Government bonds also gained with yield on the 10-year benchmark 6.10%, 2031 paper last at 6.31%, two basis points lower than previous close, as traders welcomed the inflation print for September.

Bond prices and yields move inversely.

With the fall in headline retail inflation last month providing breathing room to the RBI, bond dealers believe that the central bank may not be in a rush to commence raising interest rates.

“After the last policy statement (on Friday), there was a lot of talk about how the reverse repo rate will be raised in December, I think RBI could stretch it out till February, given that inflation so far is behaving itself. The only joker in the pack is oil prices,” a dealer with a large foreign bank said on condition of anonymity.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What’s behind the demand for Indian high-yield dollar bonds?, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


There are no takers in India for corporate notes with even a whiff of credit risk. But such is the fear among global investors around China’s overleveraged property developers that money can’t stop pouring into Indian high-yield dollar bonds.

Domestic debt issuances by all except the top-rated borrowers have shrunk since the collapse of the IL&FS Group, a major infrastructure financier, in September 2018. Firms rated below AA have managed to garner just 382 billion rupees ($5.2 billion) this year, a far cry from their 2017 haul of 2.1 trillion rupees.

The situation in the international market is the exact opposite. Junk-rated nonfinancial firms from India have scooped up a record $9 billion this year, almost three times the year-earlier period. JSW Steel Ltd. alone raised $1 billon last month. Tycoon Gautam Adani has pipped even historically trusted public-sector issuers, such as Power Finance Corp. and Export-Import Bank of India. Firms linked to Asia’s second-richest man have raised $9 billion in the past five years, more than any other Indian borrower.

For investors wary of China, looking at India makes sense. At more than $300 billion, China Evergrande Group’s liabilities alone are more than twice the size of India’s entire corporate bond market. While nobody knows which sector or private business in the People’s Republic will get punished next by Xi Jinping’s “common prosperity” campaign, overseas investors have a fair idea which Indian corporate groups have a good relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.

Still, policy makers in New Delhi and Mumbai would prefer fund-raising to take place locally, in their home currency. After all, they’re running a fully stocked liquidity bar, with the surplus in the banking system ranging between $90 billion and $130 billion since end-June. It’s a risky ploy. With the Federal Reserve close to reining in generous monetary support for the pandemic-hit U.S. economy, India’s happy hours can’t go on indefinitely. To boost anemic investment and jobs, the authorities want credit to perk up. But how long can they wait when easy money is only going into overpriced equities? Leaving aside the local bond market, even bank lending to the corporate sector is refusing to budge.

The central bank can point to 5.3% inflation, within its target range, to postpone the inevitable tightening in its monetary-policy meeting today. Granted, soaring global oil prices will bring discomfort to a country that imports most of its energy. An acute coal shortage at power plants may push inflation higher as steelmakers pay more for the commodity. It may also add to the record September trade deficit of nearly $23 billion. The reassuring news is that India isn’t living hand to mouth, having nearly $650 billion in foreign-exchange reserves, and an overall balance-of-payments that HSBC Holdings Plc expects to remain in surplus for years. Knowing they’re unlikely to lose money from a sudden rupee depreciation, foreigners may keep coming for India’s stocks and bonds.

But the extra dollars arrive with a cost. A rupee that’s too strong compared with trading partners’ inflation-adjusted currencies leads to a loss of competitiveness. That’s probably what’s going on in India. “In a version of the Dutch disease, an overvalued rupee could impede growth in domestic manufacturing and jobs,” says Observatory Group analyst Ananth Narayan.

Surging gold imports often signal nervousness. Some of the heightened demand can be attributed to jewelers. With the virus in retreat, they’re stocking up for the Hindu festive season, which has just begun. But could it also be that having made their money in stocks, rich Indians are buying the yellow metal and Bitcoin because they know that the ultimate source of demand in the economy is weak, and that the currency is artificially high?

As long as the rupee doesn’t roll over, India will get some of the capital fleeing China. But love in the time of Evergrande isn’t forever. The local credit market needs to turn a little less grumpy. Once the Fed starts tapering its balance sheet, the moment may be lost.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Amitabh Chaudhry, MD & CEO, Axis Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In an interview with ET Now, Amitabh Chaudhry, MD & CEO, Axis Bank, talks about surprise numbers post-COVID waves, the economy picking up, cash rich corporates, banking tech, partnering with fintechs, and more.

On one hand we are trying to understand the impact of COVID and on the other, we are trying to understand that how can one maximise in this low liquidity environment. In your last official communication to investors and the markets, you said that there is stress at the retail end of the book and it will continue for some time but recovery will also be equally sharp. Would like to change your guidance or you would like to stick to it?

The positive outcomes that we are seeing over the last couple of months are quite obvious and I think the market is talking about it as well. We think that if these trends continue the overall portfolio performance in terms of recovery efforts across the financial sector should be visible. And when we did out last earnings call, we said that June was way better than what we saw in May and April and July is trending better and so is August.

As far as outlook on pickup and capex cycle is concerned, there are reasonable indications that the private capex creation has started but is in select segments at this stage. We are certainly seeing lot more conversations around capex at this time than we have seen in the last couple of years. The private sector capex is robust in some segments like upstream refinery, steel, cement, chemical, pharma, renewable, storage systems.

The government has come out with a scheme asking for investments in electronics and industrial automation, logistics, export oriented industries. The government is also investing a lot in railways, roads and highways. There are other sectors which are still struggling a bit but one is hopeful that if we can contain the issues around COVID and it does not deteriorate from here, the economy will pick up.

The government and RBI are being very supportive, very accommodative, which is adding to the revival of the entire economy. The government’s monetisation plan will take time but I think the plan is to monetise and put it all back in the economy, so that should also help. Obviously, there are risks in the horizon which we all should be aware of. COVID has taught us a lot about risks and being prepared for them.

If we go back five quarters, Axis and other large banks came out with their numbers post-first wave. They surprised the market because retail delinquencies, which were expected to be high, were not that high. When the last quarter numbers came out post-second wave, the retail delinquencies were not supposed to be high but they were. What changed?Let us not forget that there were lot of retail customers who were supported in the first COVID wave through two specific moratoriums and restructuring. In the second wave, there was no moratorium. There was some restructuring which has been permitted but there are certain rules under which that restructuring has been allowed.

A lot of customers who took shelter in the first-COVID wave remain stressed and the second-COVID wave has pushed them further.

Also, in the second wave the health cost for a lot of people shot up sharply. People also kept some money away or were forced to spend that money, the savings which they were planning to apply towards repaying loans. A lot of people became careful, sat on the money and postponed EMIs.

All of us are worried about a potential third COVID wave but the recovery is also quite solid and it was evident in the first quarter calls.

In our case a lot of the slippages on the retail side were coming from secured assets and the loan-to-value against secured assets were low. We were never worried that the money will not come. It is just an issue of time. When money is not being paid, it goes into slippage but over a period of time we will be able to recover the money either way. Either the customer will repay or we will be able to sell those assets. So in that sense demand is good. It is moving in the right direction. Recoveries have gained momentum.

The general view is that lot of big companies are suddenly cash rich. So while capex has started. do you think that a lot of corporates are funding their balance sheets on internal accruals. They may not tap banks and capex may start but historical credit growth rate may not come back?
You are absolutely right. I mean the credit offtake from the system remains moderate, non-food credit growth as of end of July was 6.2% year on year and has averaged only 6% for this fiscal. So in that sense, the credit offtake is not picking up.

As you rightly pointed out, it is because the extraordinary stimulus has led to system liquidity surplus, resulting in lower market borrowing rates, larger and higher rated corporates are sitting on huge piles of cash. They have repaid their borrowings in the market. So the credit growth of the industrial sector has been driven by mid corporates and some refinancing.

We believe that there are considerable credit opportunities as the economy starts reviving. As some capex starts, we will get decent opportunities to grow. Our advances growth in the first quarter was 12%, although the credit growth in the first quarter was 6%, the SME book grew by almost 18% despite a pivoting to a more conservative approach on lending.

Highly rated corporates have relied on either the bond markets or they are generating so much cash. They are not spending enough on capex while sitting on huge piles of cash. They are repaying the debt in the system so the credit growth is quite tepid at this point in time.

Will I be correct when I say that banks historically have been a proxy to corporate growth but this time it may not translate into historical trends?
It is possible. The only hope is that as the large corporates start spending on capex and as that money flows to mid corporates and SMEs, we will see credit growth come back in some of those sectors. But yes, if they keep relying on the cash they are generating or some of other avenues which are non-banking, like equity, the corporate bond market or do foreign borrowings, then you might not see a direct correlation of that spend coming in through credit growth of the banking sector.

If I have to put the economic environment based on your market commentary and ROE of 15-15.5% you shared, will that be achievable in FY22 or could that get pushed?
If you look at our last year’s fourth quarter number, if you remove one off items, we had reached 15% number ROE. Because of Covid’s second wave, the impact on the retail portfolio has got pushed out in this financial year. I do not want to comment on quarter three or quarter four but we believe that if you take off the extraordinary items, which are coming through because of market situation, the bank is already operating in the zone of 15-16% ROE. Our ambition is to take it to 18% and getting to 18% from 15-16% is a tough battle.

How can we be best in class in terms of customer experience and how can we be best in class in terms of rigour and rhythm we bring to the system. It is a long journey and it will take us a couple of years for us.

The relative comparison for a shareholder would be ICICI Bank which is taking their subsidiaries public, State Bank of India is planning to take their subsidiaries public, you are now the promoter of Max, how are you planning to increase the importance of subsidiaries? The last quarter was a great quarter for you but how will you differentiate when other banks are ramping up their subsidiary businesses?

When I had joined the bank in 2018, I had said that one of the important pillars of our strategy would be to further focus on scaling of the subsidiaries so that they can gain higher market share in their respective businesses. If you analyse the quarter one earnings of our subsidiaries, it would be touching nearly Rs 1000 crore which is an important milestone for us.

We believe that it is very important for us to scale the subsidiaries further over the next couple of years. We will ask ourselves the benefit of listing these subsidiaries or should we continue to adopt the model we have now?

We want investors to look at Axis Bank as a group, which has the bank and various subsidiaries. We have a shareholder in Axis AMC, and today it is the seventh largest AMC. It is the largest player in the equity side of the investments which people are making, and the money people are putting in mutual funds, its AUM grew 55% year-on-year, PAT grew 90% year-on-year. Axis Capital continues to maintain its leadership position in the ECM League Table. if you look at Axis Finance, even though it was a wholesale NBFC, its asset quality is one of the best in the industry and their foray into retail is also working quite well.

If you look at Axis Securities, its profit went up 7 times last year. So in that sense, I think the subsidiaries are tracking well. We want them to focus on scaling up those subsidiaries. The people who work in those subsidiaries are getting stock options in Axis Bank. I think it is in the interest of everyone working throughout Axis Group.

A couple of years later we will see whether we need to reassess the strategy and decide whether we want to list or we want to continue with what we are doing at this point in time. Right now we will keep at it, we do not intent to list any subsidiaries at this time.

In Covid times we have enjoyed banking experiences sitting at home, there is a new fintech world which is getting created. Korea has got a bank which is a branchless bank, what happens in three to five years, how will you keep up pace, how will you transform from being a branch based bank to a bank which is digital/financial tech ready?

So with banking or any other industry that one can think of, be it auto or retail or even media, some of the so called old economy sectors, you cannot think of a world in the next three to five years where technology will not play an important role. Over the past five years, the acceleration towards embracing technology with rapid emergence of fintech and Covid has only hastened the space.

So whoever is unwilling to adopt these new ways of working, what technology is bringing in, will only fall by wayside and banking cannot be kept away from it. So from our perspective, we recognised a couple of years back, we have to scale up our investments in technology in a big way. For example, Axis technology spend has gone up by 78% in the last two years. We have setup a separate digital bank where we have 800 people working and we believe that we have to disrupt ourselves to ensure that we can compete with what is going to happen in the market and the fintechs which are going to come up.

Whoever brings convenience to customers is more than welcome because fintechs and payment companies have done a wonderful job over the years and that is why we made the acquisition FreeCharge in 2017. There is no doubt that they will continue to disrupt the market going forward and if we do not keep pace with them, if we do not partner with them, if we do not embrace what they are doing and their ways of working, we will suffer.

The entire strategy of Axis on the digital front is around changing ourselves, making significantly more investments than what we have done in the past and also at the same time work in partnership with these fintechs or these new ways of working to ensure that we not only benefit in terms of what they are doing but in some cases, we can provide the pipes or solutions which they never intended to invest in.

A partnership will become more effective in the marketplace and you will see Axis partnering with more fintechs going forwards in the future. So it is just us trying to ensure that we have enough things happening at the same time, that we do not miss any opportunity and at the same time we are disrupting ourselves so that we can compete head on with them and actually give them a tough time in the marketplace and get our fair share.

So what is the next growth frontier? If you look at banks between 2000 and 2020, retail was a growth frontier, financial inclusion started, everybody was able to get more fee based income which in a sense has been the differentiating factor. For next couple of years, what is the next growth frontier for you?

At a very simplistic level, if you look at our deposit market share it is only 4.5%, if you look at our advances market share, it is 5.7%, if you look at our RTGS, NEFT market share, it has been improving but it is still slightly below 10%. If you look at our share in UPI, it is close to 15%, if you look at our share in credit cards, it is 11%.

If you look at the deposit advances and where we are in terms of the highest market share, we still are a small part of the market. So even for a moment if I was to assume that the overall market growth will be limited, our opportunity to grow within this market or itself is huge and so as a bank as we transform ourselves and every business of ours.

There is are huge growth opportunities for the next five to seven years, which is not reliant on the market growing. The market itself is getting disrupted and we as a large bank with a strong balance sheet have only increased the pace of change.

We are laying the foundation for the future where we can capitalise business opportunities in almost every segment. You asked me retail was a way to go but what about the future? My view is that retail will continue to grow, we are one of the few banks which can support a corporate across its requirements on lending, borrowing, trade finance, cash management and everything.

SME is a business which Axis has always been strong in. I told you about our UPI market share, on the merchant acquisition side we are big, in the credit card market, we are a number four player, so we have an opportunity, the wherewithal, the management and the talent to be able to go across these businesses.

We are pressing the accelerator, keeping our risk framework intact, keeping conservative business intact, we believe enough opportunities exist across all our businesses.

How do markets value banks price to book, asset minus liability? Do you think the differentiation now will be not growth and balance sheet but growth and profitability?

If you look at the price to book as a measure, I think the market has been quite savvy in terms of differentiating across various banks based on the kind of growth they have delivered, the kind of asset quality they have had and so on so forth. I think yes, over the period of last couple of years, a couple of banks are moving into the kind of same zone, their balance sheet, their asset quality, their growth strategies at least in terms of output tends to look similar but India is large enough to be able to take in a number of banks which will do very well.

We are the third largest private bank in terms of asset size, we have crossed Rs 10 lakh crore in terms of our asset size, in terms of market cap, we are slightly behind and obviously our view is that we need to just keep doing the right things the right way and keep executing better than what we have done in the past and finally if the market recognises that there is more predictability about how we are going about things, it will get reflected in the price.

I also mentioned to you earlier that there is a clear move where these bigger banks have benefited at the cost of the smaller institutions and in a crisis like this that tends to happen even more or more pronounced. Let us see how this plays out but my view is that the bigger banks have the wherewithal, the balance sheet, the strength, the ability to invest in the future and the will continue to benefit from an Indian economy which should start seeing growth all over again. I think the Indian story remains intact. I not only believe Indian story remains intact there is a huge growth opportunity ahead of this Indian story and hopefully we will be able to capitalise on it.

You know this more than anyone else that when growth comes back, it surprises everybody positively. Barring the risk of a third wave, do you see any other risk on the horizon or do you think if there is no third wave, then we are in for a growth surprise?

Ultimately we are in the risk taking business. We have to be aware of the risks that exist out there and in that sense, we have to be cognisant of the third wave and be very watchful about that. Keeping that side, you know India has not seen capex to the extent given the size of the economy over the last couple of years. We have to be watchful as to when the economy really starts reviving so that is the second risk which we would be aware of.

Third, while all of us are talking about technology, digitisation and you know providing a seamless experience to the customers, we have to be aware of the risk in terms of cyber security, in terms of technology not working the way it should work, in terms of a bad digital experience.

There is that risk which you need to be aware of, your operating risk increase manifolds. It is not just about investing, we also have to be very fully aware of the risks which you are creating because you are moving towards a more digitised world in the future and everything is connected. You could get impacted because someone else did not do their job well and that is why the Reserve Bank of India very rightly so is coming after banks and the institutions in a big way to ensure that they have a very robust strong, scalable technology architecture.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bond market witnessed 60% decline in issuances: CARE Ratings

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The bond market witnessed a sharp 60 per cent decline in issuances in the first quarter (Q1) of FY22, with total issuances being at ₹87,885 crore as against ₹2,21,668 crore during the same period last year, according to CARE Ratings.

In 2020, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had announced a series of Long-Term Repo Operations (LTRO) and Targeted LTRO operations which helped the corporate bond market.

“This year, while there have been announcements made for special LTROs for small finance banks the response has been limited.” the agency said in a statement.

CARE Ratings observed that bank credit growth has been in the negative zone with de-growth of 1 per cent on top of -1.2 per cent last year.

On a sector-wise basis for the first quarter of the year, there was a fall in growth in credit by 1.7 per cent for industry and 1.1 per cent for services.

Growth in outstanding Commercial Papers was lower at 3.2 per cent this quarter against 13.6 per cent in 2020.

Meanwhile, CARE Ratings reported a 10 per cent increase in standalone net profit at ₹11 crore in the first quarter ended June 30, against ₹10 crore in the year ago quarter.

Standalone total income increased by 16.31 per cent from ₹42.49 crore in Q1 FY21 to ₹49.42 crore in Q1 FY22. Total expenses rose by 21.07 per cent from ₹30.09 crore to ₹36.43 crore.

“The first quarter of the year started with lockdowns being imposed by several states sequentially over the first two months which restricted consumption activity. This has been reflected in the lower PMI indices for manufacturing and services this quarter.”

“Therefore, the overall environment in the credit and debt markets was subdued amid lockdown conditions which affected real sector activity. All this affected investment activity in the economy which had a bearing on the credit rating industry,” the agency said in a statement.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How the RBI forced bond market to tango

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

The ‘bond vigilantes’ who were warned by the RBI to stop demanding high yields in bond auctions do not seem to be in any mood to listen. The central bank is clearly livid, and this is apparent in the action that unfolded in the bond market on Friday.

Yields rise

The yield on 10-year bonds, which had moved lower to 6.01 per cent after the central bank unveiled the G-SAP 1.0 programme, spiked above 6.12 per cent after the first G-SAP auction on Thursday. The market was apparently not happy with the quantum of purchase in the 10-year bucket.

The bond market was on the edge through Friday, with 10-year yields trading at around 6.16 per cent, ahead of the weekly auction amounting to ₹26,000 crore in which 10-year securities accounted for ₹14,000 crore.

The auction results reveal that the RBI has not purchased any 10-year paper, though bids worth ₹28,000 crore were received for these securities. Ten-year bond yields plunged sharply after 3 pm, when auction results were announced, and are now trading at 6.08 per cent again. The RBI intended to offer bonds worth ₹25,000 crore in the first G-SAP auction. The response to the auction was robust, with offers worth ₹1,01,671 crore received.

The RBI accepted the entire ₹25,000 crore that it originally offered to purchase. The problem in the G-SAP auction, according to market sources, was that the ₹25,000 crore notified by the RBI was spread across maturities (see table). The amount intended for the 10-year bonds was only ₹7,500 crore. The bond market wanted higher purchases in this maturity because the government tends to borrow mainly in this bracket.

For instance, in the weekly auction scheduled for April 16, more than 50 per cent was ear-marked for 10-year securities. The level of nervousness among underwriters was obvious in the commission auctioned for 10-year bonds shooting up to 47.17 paisa on Friday.

 

Other reasons

The other reason why 10-year yields moved higher is because the cut-off yield for 6-year bonds bought in the G-SAP auction was 6.13 per cent.

While the RBI is trying to cool the yield in the 10-year bonds, the yields on 6, 7, 8 and 9 year bonds are higher than the 10-year, implying that the market does want the bond prices to trade lower across maturities, given the large supply scheduled to flood the market. The WPI inflation number released yesterday was yet another dampener for bonds.

“The expected trajectory of the WPI inflation, and its partial transmission into the CPI inflation, going ahead, supports our view that there is negligible space for rate cuts to support growth, in spite of the growing uncertainty related to the surge in Covid-19 cases, localised restrictions and emerging concerns regarding migrants returning to the hinterland. This is likely to keep a floor under the G-Sec yields,” says Aditi Nayar, Chief Economist, ICRA.

It’s clear that market forces dictate that 10-year yields have to move higher from here. It has to be seen how long the RBI can keep yields in check with these strong arm tactics and threats of ‘tandav’.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

As bond yields harden further, all eyes on RBI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With the yield on the two liquid 10-year Government Securities (G-Secs) hardening further by 5-7 basis points on Monday, all eyes are now on the next move of the Reserve Bank of India.

Overall, yields on the new 10-year benchmark (5.85 per cent GS 2030) and the earlier benchmark (5.77 per cent GS 2030) have risen about 30 and 28 basis points, respectively, since January-end.

In price terms, the new 10-year benchmark and the earlier benchmark declined about ₹2.14 and ₹1.93, respectively, since January-end in the secondary market. (Bond yields and prices move in opposite direction.)

The rise in yields comes in the backdrop of the government announcing in the Budget that it will borrow an additional ₹80,000 crore in February-March and the borrowing for FY22 would be ₹12-lakh crore.

 

Oversupply of govt paper

There are concerns that oversupply of government paper will have a crowding-out effect on private sector investments and increase the overall cost of borrowing in the economy.

State Bank of India’s Chief Economic Adviser, Soumya Kanti Ghosh, has cautioned that any further upward movement in G-Sec yields, even by 10 bps from the current levels, could lead to mark-to-market (MTM) losses for banks. An MTM loss will require banks to make provisions for depreciation in investments.

Short-selling

In a report on G-Secs, Ghosh said that one of the reasons for the recent surge in yields might be short-selling by market players.

The report said the central bank will have to resort to unconventional tools, including speaking to market players/off-market interventions, open market operation in illiquid securities, and penalising short-sellers, to control the surge in bond market yields.

Madan Sabnavis, Chief Economist, CARE Ratings, said ever since the government announcement of additional borrowing, the markets have been spooked, with the 10-year G-Sec yield on the rise.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bond market will stabilise once there is visibility on RBI’s intervention, says Rajeev Radhakrishnan of SBI MF

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The bond market is in a turmoil due to the large borrowing program announced by the Centre. A war of nerves is currently on between the bond market and the RBI on where the yields should be. In this interaction with BusinessLine, Rajeev Radhakrishnan – CIO – Fixed Income, SBI Mutual Fund, shares his views on the current situation,

What is your view on the bond market’s ability to absorb the increased supply of government paper due to the government’s large borrowing program in FY21 and FY22?

The absorption capacity of the market is severely impacted. The market did not expect further Rs 80,000 crore borrowing this year. The Rs 9.7 lakh crore net market borrowing next year is also much higher than what most of us expected. The bigger disappointment is the RBI not announcing specific market intervention programs, given that the borrowing numbers are enormous. So far, the RBI has been reactive, doing passive yield curve control with specific actions implicitly targeting the 10y benchmark. Given that there is an enormous borrowing program that has to be conducted in a non-disruptive manner combined with the market’s reduced absorption capacity, there should be more forceful upfront intervention. This, unfortunately, has not happened. That is getting reflected in the bond yields.

The gradually recovering economic landscape also requires that financing conditions remain under control and the sovereign rates remain anchored.

RBI is sending the signal that it does not want yields to rise, will it be able to control the yields, what are the tools at its disposal?

The capital flows are very strong needing forex intervention that leads to excess liquidity in the system and constrains RBI’s ability to intervene in the bond market. I expected Market Stabilization Scheme issuances to be announced in the Budget and I am quite surprised that it was not done. From October, November 2020, we have had large capital flows, amounting to more than $10 billion. It’s clear that these flows will continue due to external events and benign global risk-free rates, thereby ensuring that large capital flows may have to be considered as a near term base case assumption. The MSS tool was created to sterilize rupee liquidity arising out of Fx interventions and that is unfortunately not being provided for.

Right now, the market does not have visibility on RBI’s open market operations schedule and that will be manifested in auction bids. Once the market gets that visibility that the RBI will do a certain quantity of intervention, either through operation twist or OMO, the tug of war between market and RBI on yields can cease.

What are your views on where bond yields are headed in FY22?

Given that we have a higher supply schedule than expected, and we have RBI intervention that is uncertain, there is fear that there will be gradual inching up of yields. Already the 5.90 per cent level that RBI was defending for a while has been pushed up to 6.10 per cent.

There will be RBI intervention at a higher level, but the risk remains that yields will drift higher gradually.

What do you think about the move to allow retail participants into G-Secs directly through retail direct? Will this work?

It is a perfect idea to allow retail investors in government debt and RBI has been trying to do this for a while. But it may not have an immediate impact in enabling a new source of demand for Government securities. If the government had provided some tax break in the Budget maybe even as a one-off measure for retail investors, it might have worked immediately. However, as a long term measure, this is positive and provides retail investors with direct access to a credit risk-free product.

Despite the higher rates in India than in the US and Europe, FPIs are not really showing appetite for Indian debt; they net sold $14 billion of Indian debt in 2020. What’s the reason?

The FPI outflows in calendar 2020 should be seen in the context of a weaker economic growth outlook which could have led to concerns surrounding India’s debt dynamics, its impact on currency markets, an elevated CPI reducing real returns and any potential rating migration concerns. However, foreign portfolio investors have received decent dollar returns on Indian debt as the rupee has been quite stable during the pandemic.

One issue with the Indian debt market is that FPIs find the access rules are quite restraining. Two, in the current context, foreign investors face the same issue as domestic investors in that they do not know the RBI’s intention on OMOs and the potential mark to market on holdings. And third, we are not in the global bond indices, which can attract foreign flows. Fourth, people are buying Indian bonds denominated in dollars raised by Indian companies on overseas exchanges. There are a lot of dollar issuances happening this year too.

I will not be surprised with FPI inflows into debt resume this year, since these flows are influenced by the previous year’s experience concerning currency movement and bond returns.

What is the best strategy for investors in debt mutual funds?

Opportunities for capital gains are likely to be limited because the RBI is likely to stay reactive with respect to market intervention. A recovering economy should also lead to a gradual unwinding of crisis-era liquidity and monetary conditions. Accordingly, investors should get used to much moderate return on debt funds compared to the last couple of years. Debt fund portfolio strategy would be oriented around protecting capital with a directionally lower duration strategy than what we held earlier. And portfolios with flexibility in the mandate like dynamic bond strategy could be attractive subject to individual risk preferences for a medium-term horizon.

For investments with a short term time horizon, products such as ultra-short-term category may remain appropriate.

Do you think policy rates have bottomed?

Definitely. I think rates will remain on hold for a while. But liquidity will normalize first, sometime during this year. Maybe next year the policy rates will begin to normalize. The policy normalization would be a function of confidence in a self-sustaining recovery in economic growth.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY