All you wanted to know about NRI bank fixed deposits

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


With central banks world over resorting to easy monetary policy, interest rates have plunged to all-time lows. If you are an NRI the rates offered on fixed deposits by banks in India may, however still be relatively higher when compared to those on fixed income investments in countries where you currently reside – be it the USA, UK, Australia, Saudi Arabia, or Denmark.

NRIs can invest in bank FDs in India either in Indian rupees or foreign currency. The rupee-denominated bank deposits can be NRE or NRO depending on the source of the money being invested. If income has been earned in India, the money must be deposited in an NRO (Non Resident Ordinary) deposit only. In other cases, an NRE (Non Resident External) deposit will be opened.

Those wishing to keep the money in the currency of the country where they currently live, can choose between FCNR (Foreign Currency Non Repatriable) Deposits and RFC (Resident Foreign Currency) deposits. These FDs fetch interest income in foreign currency and help save on costs (also losses at times) on account of currency conversion. Most banks accept FCNR deposits in currencies such as the Great Britain Pound, the US Dollar, the Euro, the Canadian Dollar, the Japanese Yen, and the Singapore Dollar.

However, in case of RFC deposits, banks mostly accept deposits in the Great Britain Pound and the US Dollar. The RFC deposits are mostly a preferred choice for those who wish to return to India or have already returned to India. RFC deposits, which can be held for a maximum tenure of three years, allow such NRIs to park incomes earned abroadon their return to India. These deposits help save taxes when you lose your ‘non-resident’ status as per the tax laws.

Not only do these different deposits available for NRIs offer varying interest rates but their taxability and the rules of repatriation also differ. To help you choose better, here is a lowdown on their varying features.

Returns and taxes

The rates offered on NRO and NRE term deposits are mostly at par with those offered to resident deposit holders. The tenure too is similar. In the case of NRE term deposits alone, however, most banks do not offer deposits for less than a year’s term.

Currently, Indian banks offer interest rates in the rage of 4.9 to 6.5 per cent per annum, on deposits with tenures ranging from one to five years.

That said, since the interest earned on NRE deposits is exempt from taxation in India, the post-tax return is higher for these deposits. The interest earned on NRO deposits, which comprise monies earned in India is taxed as ‘income from other sources’. Besides, the tax rate is as per the DTAA (Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement) between India and the respective country. Under Section 80 C of the Income tax Act, while investments in certain NRO deposits (tenure of five years or more) are eligible for tax deduction, the interest earned on the same continues to be taxable.

The interest rates offered on FCNR and RFC deposits vary according to the currency and the tenure selected. For instance, SBI offers interest rates in the range of 0.66 to 1.38 per cent per annum on its USD denominated deposits for 1 to 5 year tenures. While for the Euro denominated deposits of a similar deposit, the bank offers 0.01 to 0.15 per cent per annum.

The interest earned on FCNR deposits is tax-free for all NRIs, while that on RFC deposits is exempt only for taxpayers defined as resident but not ordinarily resident per the IT Act. For other NRIs, interest earned on RFC Deposits shall be taxable.

Repatriable or not

For NRIs, repatriation of funds might also play a crucial role in deciding the kind of deposit. Funds deposited in NRE, FCNR or RFC deposits are fully repatriable —both principal and interest. In the case of NRO deposits, while the interest earned on such deposits can be freely repatriated, the principal amount deposited is repatriable only subject to conditions.

Since the amount deposited in NRO accounts construes monies earned in India, repatriation is allowed only in the cases of certain current incomes such as rent, dividend, and pension. The RBI permits free repatriation (without prior approval) of up to USD 1 million, per financial year from such balances held in NRO accounts (along with other eligible assets), subject to tax payment.

Joint holders

While two or more NRIs can freely open a joint account in any of the above deposits, a joint deposit account with any person resident in India (irrespective of their relationship with the NRI) is permitted only in the case of an NRO account, that too on a ‘former or survivor’ basis. This means that in such joint deposits, the primary holder (NRI) will operate the account in all circumstances except in case of his/her death. Only in case of death of the first person, the joint holder will be eligible to operate the account.

For NRE, FCNR and RFC deposits, joint deposits with residents are permitted on a ‘former or survivor’ basis, only with their resident relatives These relatives include spouse, parents, siblings, and children and their respective spouses. The resident relative can, however, operate the account as a Power of Attorney holder during the lifetime of the NRI/ PIO account holder.

Akin to the term deposits discussed above, NRIs can also open a savings account, current account or a recurring deposit. Again depending upon the source of income, these can be either NRE/NRO accounts.

Do note that FCNR and RFC are choices available in term deposits only. Unlike term deposits, such savings/ current accounts can come in handy for meeting regular expenses of your dependants in India.

NRO, NRE deposit rates are at par with offers for residents

Interest earned on NRE deposits is exempt from taxation in India

NRE, FCNR or RFC deposits are fully repatriable

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ATM usage to cost more

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has accepted the long-standing demand of banks and White Label ATM operators (WLAO) for a hike in interchange fee in view of increasing cost of ATM deployment and maintenance.

This could encourage deployment of ATMs, which has hit the slow lane in the last one year amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

The interchange fee (which is recovered by banks owning ATMs from card issuing banks for providing) has been upped from ₹15 to ₹17 per financial transaction and from ₹5 to ₹6 per non-financial transaction in all centres. The new fee will be effective from August 1.

Customer charges

Simultaneously, to compensate Banks for the higher interchange fee and given the general escalation in costs, they have been allowed to increase the customer charges for transactions beyond the stipulated free monthly ATM transactions to ₹21 per transaction from ₹20. This increase will be effective from January 1, 2022.

Customers are eligible for five free transactions (inclusive of financial and non-financial transactions) every month from their own bank ATMs. In other bank ATMs they are allowed three transactions in metro centres and five in non-metro centres.

RBI, in a circular, said applicable taxes, if any, will be additionally payable on the interchange fee and customer charges. The central bank added that its instructions also apply, mutatis mutandis (with the necessary changes having been made), to transactions done at Cash Recycler Machines (other than for cash deposit transactions).

ATM additions declined to 2,815 in FY21 against 8,564 in the previous year. The number of ATMs across the country is 2.13 lakh (2.10 lakh.)

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI may give banks/NBFCs more time to appoint auditors

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

The Reserve Bank of India may give more time to regulated entities, including banks, to implement the new guidelines on the appointment of statutory auditors.

Regulated entities are of the view that a year’s time should have been given for implementing the guidelines as some of them have already re-appointed auditors for FY22. The RBI’s new norms were unveiled on April 27. The guidelines allow regulated entities to appoint auditors for three years. What this means is that audit firms that have already completed the three-year period will have to discontinue their assignment.

Financial services industry veteran TT Srinivasaraghavan observed that some of the regulated entities have already had their AGMs in which appointment of Statutory Auditors is usually on the agenda. So, industry bodies want some more time (say, from April 1, 2022) for implementation of the guidelines.

“In the meantime, an advisory/ consultative group of key stakeholders — the RBI, the regulated entities, and the CA Institute — can be asked to assess the guidelines and give recommendations within two months… there will be a 360-degree view on the issues and the potential solutions,” Srinivasaraghavan suggested.

Applicable to banks

The guidelines are applicable to commercial banks (excluding Regional Rural Banks), urban co-operative banks and non-banking finance companies (NBFCs), including housing finance companies, from financial year 2021-22. However, non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size below ₹1,000 crore can continue with their extant procedure.

Chartered Accountant Sethuratham Ravi said regulated entities can ask for a dispensation, seeking continuation of the current auditor for one more quarter. “A regulated entity can write to the RBI that it is in the process of appointing a new auditor and that the same needs to be ratified at the AGM… The RBI could have given one more year for implementation,” Ravi said.

P Sitaram, ED & CFO, IDBI Bank, said the guidelines came at a time when some banks would have proceeded with the appointment/re-appointment of auditors. “So, they should have done it (issued the guidelines) either in January or having issued it, they could have said the guidelines will be applicable from next year,” he said.

Banking expert V Viswanathan underscored that even if an audit firm has completed its three-year term, the status quo of March quarter will continue for the April-June quarter. The bank will apply for RBI approval, and it is given.

“Sometimes, public sector banks get the list (of eligible audit firms from RBI) after September also. In which case, the status quo continues for the second quarter also,” he said.

 

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Continue preserving demonetisation period CCTV footage at branches and currency chests: RBI to banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has advised all banks to preserve the CCTV recordings of operations at their branches and currency chests during the demonetisation period (from November 08, 2016 to December 30, 2016) in a proper way, till further orders.

This is in view the investigations pending with law enforcement agencies and proceedings pending at various courts, RBI said in a notification.

The Government had issued a notification on November 8, 2016, withdrawing the legal tender status of ₹500 and ₹1,000 denominations of banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi Series issued by the Reserve Bank of India.

The Government then said demonetisation of the aforementioned notes was done to tackle counterfeiting Indian banknotes, to effectively nullify black money hoarded in cash and curb funding of terrorism with fake notes.

As per RBI’s mint street memo of August 2017, currency notes of denominations of ₹1000 and ₹ 500 (specified bank notes or SBNs), valued at ₹15.4 lakh crore and constituting 86.9 per cent of the value of total notes in circulation were demonetised.

Preserving CCTV footages

On December 13, 2016, RBI had issued a notification, wherein the banks were advised to preserve the CCTV recordings of operations at bank branches and currency chests for the period from November 08, 2016 to December 30, 2016, until further instructions, to facilitate coordinated and effective action by the enforcement agencies in dealing with matters relating to illegal accumulation of new currency notes.

“In continuation to the above, keeping in view the investigations pending with law enforcement agencies, proceedings pending at various courts, you are advised to preserve the CCTV recordings of operations at bank branches and currency chests for the period from November 08, 2016 to December 30, 2016 in a proper way, till further orders,” RBI said in its notification to banks on Tuesday.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI asks banks not to delete CCTV footage from 2016 demonetisation period

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


“Banks were advised to preserve the CCTV recordings of operations at bank branches and currency chests for the period from November 08, 2016, to December 30, 2016, until further instructions, to facilitate coordinated and effective action by the enforcement agencies in dealing with matters relating to the illegal accumulation of new currency notes,” the RBI said in a circular.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday asked banks not to delete the CCTV recordings of their branch operations and currency chests from the 2016 demonetisation period. The move is aimed at helping enforcement agencies in their probe against illegal activities during the demonetisation period.

“Banks were advised to preserve the CCTV recordings of operations at bank branches and currency chests for the period from November 08, 2016, to December 30, 2016, until further instructions, to facilitate coordinated and effective action by the enforcement agencies in dealing with matters relating to the illegal accumulation of new currency notes,” the RBI said in a circular.

It may be noted that the government had banned the circulation of high denomination notes (Rs 500 and Rs 1,000) on November 8, 2016, in order to curb black money. As a part of the exercise, the government had allowed people to exchange high currency notes (Rs 500 and Rs 1,000) at banks or deposit them in their bank accounts. The government also issued new Rs 500 and Rs 2,000 notes. People lined up in front of banks and ATMs to get new currency notes. There were reports of illegal accumulation of new currency notes.

In order to help in the investigation of such matters, the RBI has asked banks to preserve CCTV footage. “Keeping in view the investigations pending with law enforcement agencies, proceedings pending at various courts, you are advised to preserve the CCTV recordings of operations at bank branches and currency chests for the period from November 08, 2016, to December 30, 2016, in a proper way, till further orders,” RBI said in the circular.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes monetary penalty on two banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹4 crore on Bank of India and of ₹2 crore on Punjab National Bank.

The statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (lSE) of Bank of India was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2019, the RBI said.

The bank had also conducted a review and submitted a Fraud Monitoring Report (FMR) dated January 1, 2019 pertaining to detection of fraud in an account. Examination of the risk assessment report on the ISE and the FMR revealed non-compliance with or contravention of the directions including breach of stipulated transaction limits; delay in transfer of unclaimed balances to DEA Fund; delay in reporting a fraud to RBI and sale of a fraudulent asset, it said.

Penalty on PNB

Meanwhile, the monetary penalty on Punjab National Bank was imposed for non-compliance of certain provisions of directions issued by RBI contained in the Master Directions on ‘Frauds – Classification and Reporting by commercial banks and select FIs’ dated July 1, 2016 and the circular on ‘Creation of a Central Repository of Large Common Exposures – Across Bank’ dated September 11, 2013, the RBI said in a separate statement.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

China banks are flush with dollars, and that’s a worry

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A mountain of dollars on deposit in China has grown so large that banks are struggling to loan the currency and traders say it poses a risk to official efforts to control a fast-rising yuan.

Investment flows

Boosted by surging export receipts and investment flows, the value of foreign cash deposits in China’s banks leapt above $1trillion for the first time in April, official data show.

A previous jump, late in 2017, preceded heavy dollar selling, which turbo-charged a steep yuan rally in early 2018.

Market participants say the size of the even bigger hoard this time raises that risk, and leaves policymakers’ efforts to restrain the yuan vulnerable to the whims of the exporters and foreign investors who own the cash.

“This positioning in particular, in our view, is susceptible to a capitulation if the broad dollar downtrend were to continue,” said UBS’ Asia currency strategist Rohit Arora, especially if the yuan gains past 6.25 or 6.2 per dollar. “We think a break of these levels … has the ability to affect market psyche,” he said, since they represent, roughly,the yuan’s 2018 peak and its top before a devaluation in 2015, and trigger selling from local corporations in particular.

The heavily managed yuan is at three-year highs, havingr allied through major resistance at 6.4 per dollar, and it clocked its best month since November in May.

Also read: Govt blocks China’s bid to enter Indian ports sector

Concerned this rapid rise could unleash huge conversion of the deposits into yuan, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) said on Monday that from mid-June, banks must set aside more reserves against them to discourage further accumulation.

State restraint

The central bank’s stance marked a shift towards confronting a trend that gathered steam while the bank had, publicly at least, kept to the sidelines.

Since 2017, the PBOC has largely left the yuan to marketforces, keeping its currency reserves just above the $3-trillion mark, while behind the scenes the state-bank andprivate sectors stepped in.

Over the 16 months to April, dollar deposits rose by $242.2 billion, PBOC data show, a rise equal to about 1.8 per cent of gross domestic product and bigger than the much-vaunted inflows into China’s bond market, which totalled about $220 billion for the period.

Even as the country’s trade surplus ballooned during the pandemic and the banking system converted $254 billion into yuan for clients, the People’s Bank of China drained just $90.2 billion from the financial system over those months.

“The private sector has overtaken the central bank to absorb excess US dollar liquidity generated by the corporates and foreign investment inflows,” said HSBC’s global FX strategists, led by Paul Mackel, in a note published on Monday.

That could also reflect the private sector’s view that theyuan is near a peak, or that it is preparing for future paymentssuch as dividends and overseas investment, they added.

Current account surplus

Raw economics can explain the accumulation: China is running the world’s largest current account surplus, and government data show about half the dollar deposits are held by local companies that have boomed with demand for their exports.

The same outperformance has attracted global capital, which has poured into a stockmarket riding on the pandemic recovery and credit markets paying better yields than other big economies because policy settings have begun to tighten.

Little guarantee

Yet these factors provide little guarantee of the cashpile’s longevity, especially as they meet with a fearsome shif tin the dollar/yuan exchange rate, which has fallen 11 per cent in a year.

To be sure, plenty of currency traders think that makes sustained further dollar drops unlikely.

UBS’ Arora and HSBC’s Mackel both reckon a drop to 6.25 per dollar is possible, but that a recovery follows – to around current levels of 6.38 by year’s end for Arora and for Mackel to around 6.60 by end 2021.

Most also reckon the central bank will not tolerate further gains and cite jaw boning from officials to cool the rally and the move to tamp down on dollar liquidity, by raising banks’ reserves ratio, as evidence of its resolve.

Onshore banking sources said that demand for new dollarloans was dire, even at rock-bottom rates – and data shows thevalue of deposits overhauling loans in December.

“How this has changed over the past few years has been quite phenomenal,” said Patrick Law, head of north Asia local markets and Asia non-deliverable forwards at Bank of America in Hong Kong.

“Last year was the first in over a decade or more, that there were more foreign currency deposits than foreign currency loans and that imbalance has grown in 2021,” he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

China banks are flush with dollars, and that’s a worry

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A mountain of dollars on deposit in China has grown so large that banks are struggling to loan the currency and traders say it poses a risk to official efforts to control a fast-rising yuan.

Investment flows

Boosted by surging export receipts and investment flows, the value of foreign cash deposits in China’s banks leapt above $1trillion for the first time in April, official data show.

A previous jump, late in 2017, preceded heavy dollar selling, which turbo-charged a steep yuan rally in early 2018.

Market participants say the size of the even bigger hoard this time raises that risk, and leaves policymakers’ efforts to restrain the yuan vulnerable to the whims of the exporters and foreign investors who own the cash.

“This positioning in particular, in our view, is susceptible to a capitulation if the broad dollar downtrend were to continue,” said UBS’ Asia currency strategist Rohit Arora, especially if the yuan gains past 6.25 or 6.2 per dollar. “We think a break of these levels … has the ability to affect market psyche,” he said, since they represent, roughly,the yuan’s 2018 peak and its top before a devaluation in 2015, and trigger selling from local corporations in particular.

Also read: Govt blocks China’s bid to enter Indian ports sector

The heavily managed yuan is at three-year highs, having rallied through major resistance at 6.4 per dollar, and it clocked its best month since November in May.

Concerned this rapid rise could unleash huge conversion of the deposits into yuan, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) said on Monday that from mid-June, banks must set aside more reserves against them to discourage further accumulation.

State restraint

The central bank’s stance marked a shift towards confronting a trend that gathered steam while the bank had, publicly at least, kept to the sidelines.

Since 2017, the PBOC has largely left the yuan to market forces, keeping its currency reserves just above the $3-trillion mark, while behind the scenes the state-bank and private sectors stepped in.

Over the 16 months to April, dollar deposits rose by $242.2 billion, PBOC data show, a rise equal to about 1.8 per cent of gross domestic product and bigger than the much-vaunted inflows into China’s bond market, which totalled about $220 billion for the period.

Even as the country’s trade surplus ballooned during the pandemic and the banking system converted $254 billion into yuan for clients, the People’s Bank of China drained just $90.2 billion from the financial system over those months.

“The private sector has overtaken the central bank to absorb excess US dollar liquidity generated by the corporates and foreign investment inflows,” said HSBC’s global FX strategists, led by Paul Mackel, in a note published on Monday.

That could also reflect the private sector’s view that the yuan is near a peak, or that it is preparing for future payments such as dividends and overseas investment, they added.

Current account surplus

Raw economics can explain the accumulation: China is running the world’s largest current account surplus, and government data show about half the dollar deposits are held by local companies that have boomed with demand for their exports.

The same outperformance has attracted global capital, which has poured into a stock market riding on the pandemic recovery and credit markets paying better yields than other big economies because policy settings have begun to tighten.

Little guarantee

Yet these factors provide little guarantee of the cash pile’s longevity, especially as they meet with a fearsome shift in the dollar/yuan exchange rate, which has fallen 11 per cent in a year.

To be sure, plenty of currency traders think that makes sustained further dollar drops unlikely.

UBS’ Arora and HSBC’s Mackel both reckon a drop to 6.25 per dollar is possible, but that a recovery follows – to around current levels of 6.38 by year’s end for Arora and for Mackel to around 6.60 by end 2021.

Most also reckon the central bank will not tolerate further gains and cite jaw boning from officials to cool the rally and the move to tamp down on dollar liquidity, by raising banks’ reserves ratio, as evidence of its resolve.

Onshore banking sources said that demand for new dollar loans was dire, even at rock-bottom rates – and data shows the value of deposits overhauling loans in December.

“How this has changed over the past few years has been quite phenomenal,” said Patrick Law, head of north Asia local markets and Asia non-deliverable forwards at Bank of America in Hong Kong.

“Last year was the first in over a decade or more, that there were more foreign currency deposits than foreign currency loans and that imbalance has grown in 2021,” he said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks need to beef up on the ground security at ATMs : AIBOC

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Officers’Confederation (AIBOC) has requested the Department of Financial Services (DFS) to take up with Banks as well as State Governments the need to beef up on the ground security at ATM sites as criminals are increasingly manipulating bank software to siphon cash out of unguarded ATMs.

The Association expressed deep concern over the spate of ingenuous ATM frauds — Man in the Middle (MiTM) model ATM hackings — that have surfaced in several cities of the country by accessing the server of the bank.

MiTM ATM hacking involves bypassing of systems, whereby cyber fraudsters secretly intercept the two-way encrypted messaging and data transfer between an ATM and its bank servers, and manipulate it to prompt ATMs to spew cash from unguarded ATMs, AIBOC said in a statement.

“It is pertinent to mention that all such frauds are taking place in unguarded ATMs in spite of having e-surveillance installed therein. The lacunae being that such surveillance are not real-time and the fraudsters are taking advantage of the vulnerability of the unguarded ATM kiosks,” said Soumya Datta, General Secretary, AIBOC.

Sacking of guards backfired

The move of almost all banks to withdraw security guards/caretakers at their ATM Kiosks in an effort to reduce overheads has backfired, Datta said.

Also read: HDFC Bank deploys mobile ATMs

“Such decision of the bank management has drained out crores of rupees through sophisticated cyber-attacks on ATMs that far outweigh the so-called savings from withdrawal of guards/caretakers. At this point of time, it appears that the banks and the vendors are sustaining substantial financial loss. The quantum of loss sustained could be a staggering amount if all banks undertake an immediate reconciliation of the accounts,” cautioned Datta.

AIBOC underscored that the need to deploy caretakers to prevent the perpetration of such fraudulent acts as well as to instil confidence amongst the banking personnel and customers. “The immediate challenge confronting the banks is to fortify the safety and security arrangements by deploying caretakers and to bolster internal security system. All stake holders are required to upgrade their ATM security to thwart such MiTM attacks,” said Datta.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Central authority needed to vet write-off, compromise proposals: AIBEA

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has called for the setting up of a Central authority, comprising retired bankers with credit knowledge and integrity, under the auspices of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to vet the proposals for write-off and compromise.

The authorities or the Committees that have sanctioned loans must not have the powers to write-off the same, according to CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBEA. “The (public sector) banks are bleeding because of the problem of bad loans and huge write-offs and provisioning are being made year after year from out of the operating profits,” he said.

Also read: Delay in insolvency resolution continues to be cause for concern

As per the Association, in 2019, bad loan write-offs by banks amounted to ₹1,83,391 crore and the amount transferred from operating profits as provisions for bad loans/ NPAs (Non-Performing Assets) was at ₹2,29,852 crore.

‘Compromise’ proposals

Venkatachalam emphasised that all write-off proposals beyond a particular limit should be disposed off by the Central Authority constituted specifically for the purpose. Further, “compromise” proposals should be screened at the highest levels. He alleged that going by present day experience, these so-called “compromise proposals” are nothing but camouflage and cover-up of collusive acts.

“Willful bank loan default should be treated as a criminal offence… personal guarantees/ assets of the borrowers including directors of the corporate sector should be attachable for recovery of bank loan dues as has been held by the Supreme Court of India,” Venkatachalam said.

In a representation to the RBI’s committee on the functioning of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs), AIBEA said, “Looking to ARCs’ track record, recovery performance, and the loss borne by the banks on bad debts handled by ARCs, we are very clear that ARCs are not required but stringent laws should be enacted to recover all willful defaults at a relatively quick-time.”

Also read: Private sector banks increased share in deposits, credit at the cost of PSBs in FY21:

The Association suggested that banks should be banned from lending to a company or group of companies, which defaulted and whose account has become a NPA in a particular bank. “The loans of such groups in other banks should also be treated as NPA and should be recalled by the banks. This, we feel, would enable speedy recovery of willfully defaulted corporate loans,” Venkatachalam said.

‘No participation’

The company or group of companies should not also be allowed to participate in the auction for purchase of assets of other defaulting company or group of companies that are brought through SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002) or ARCs.

The Association said in case of ARCs, as far as the Public Sector Banks are concerned, the amount of discount with which a bad loan is sold, the discounted amount should be replenished by the government of India as they are the primary owners of these banks.

Also read: Bank credit growth declines to 5.6 per cent in March

“The present system of sharing recovery on water-fall structure has to change. At present, ARC recovers first its legal and resolution expenses and then management fees and thereafter the recovery is shared in the agreed ratios. This needs to be changed to proportionate sharing of all the items so as to keep the ARC driving recovery,” Venkatachalam said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 13 14 15 16 17 24