DIPAM seeks bids for transaction advisor for IDBI Bank strategic disinvestment, last date July 13, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The department of investment and public asset management (DIPAM) Tuesday issued a request for proposal for appointing transaction advisor for strategic disinvestment and transfer of management control in IDBI Bank Limited.

Among several criteria listed for eligibility, bidders should have completed at least one transaction of strategic disinvestment, strategic sale or merger and acquisition of Rs 5000 crore or more in size, between April 2016 and March, 2021. The last date for submissions is July 13.

The professional financial consulting firm, investment banker, merchant banker, financial institution or bank bidding for the contract, should have at least five years’ experience in providing advisory service in such transactions.

“The Transaction Advisor (TA) will be required to undertake tasks related to all aspects of the proposed strategic disinvestment culminating into successful completion of the transaction and would, inter alia include but not limited to advising and assisting government of India on modalities of disinvestment and the timing,” the department said as it set out terms of reference for the advisor in the RFP.

The advisor would recommend the need for other intermediaries required for the process of sale or disinvestment, help in identification and selection of the same with proper terms of reference, prepare documents such as the Preliminary Information Memorandum (PIM), Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM), Request for Proposal (RFP), Confidentiality Agreement et al.

It will also structure the transaction, organize roadshows, suggest measures to fetch optimum value, position of the strategic sale, invite and evaluate bids, assist and professionally guide during the negotiations with prospective buyers, draw up the sale or other agreements and advise on post-sale matters on a continuous basis.

DIPAM has barred a person or company owning more than 50% equity interest in the merchant banker or controls the merchant bankers, from participating in the competitive process for acquisition of IDBI Bank.

“For clarity, parent entity cannot participate in transaction process in case the selected bidder is subsidiary of an existing retail bank.

In case the interested Transaction Advisor is a subsidiary of an existing retail bank, they need to provide documentation explaining firewall or Chinese-wall structure to maintain confidentiality and conflict of interest.

DIPAM has also barred public sector banks cannot participate as bidders for acquisition of IDBI Bank in the transaction process. Subsidiaries of IDBI Bank – IDBI Capital Markets – cannot participate as bidders for transaction advisors.

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs had given an in-principle approval for the strategic divestment of IDBI Bank in May this year. The extent of shareholding to be divested by the Indian government and Life Insurance Corporation of India will be decided at the time of structuring of transaction in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, it had said.

IDBI Bank is classified as a private sector bank by RBI with government shareholding at 45.48%, LIC of India shareholding at 49.24% and non-promoter shareholding at 5.29%.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

NCUI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Cooperative body NCUI has welcomed the RBI’s in-principal nod to Centrum Financial Services for the takeover of PMC Bank, but said all depositors should get back their deposits without any condition. Paving the way for the takeover of crisis-ridden Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative Bank (PMC), the Reserve Bank of India on Friday granted in-principle approval to the Centrum Financial Services to set up a small finance bank.

Centrum Financial Services was one of the applicants for the takeover of the PMC Bank.

Reacting to RBI’s in principle approval to Centrum Financial Services, NCUI President Dileep Sanghani in a statement said, “This is indeed welcome. However, it should be ensured that all the depositors should get back their deposits without any conditionality.”

However, he said it would have been better if all the big UCBs should have mobilised the funds together to revive the bank.

National Federation of Urban Cooperative Banks and Credit Societies Ltd (NAFCUB) President Jyotindra Mehta said, “This is in accordance with the wishes of the sector, and the depositors. This will no doubt boost the image of the sector. However, the culprits who committed the fraud in the bank must be punished.”

GH Amin, Chairman, Cooperative Bank of India, and Chairman, Gujarat State Cooperative Union welcomed the move. “It is a good gesture, of taking over a crisis-hit bank by a small finance bank, and reviving it. The depositors will get an assurance of getting back their deposits.”

National Federation of State Co-operative Banks Ltd (NAFSCOB) MD Bhima Subrahmanyam said, “The move is indeed appreciable. However, all the depositors should get back their deposits without any conditionality”.

Large urban cooperative banks should have taken over PMC Bank and started a small finance bank, as the PMC had an excellent image before the fraud happened, he added. Subrahmanyam is also President International Cooperative Banking Association.

On Friday, the RBI gave ”in-principle” approval to the Centrum Financial Services Limited’s offer of February 1, 2021, for the takeover of PMC Bank Ltd.

The PMC Bank had invited Expression of Interest (EoI) from eligible investors for investment/ equity participation for its reconstruction and had received four proposals.

In September 2019, the RBI had superseded the board of PMC and placed it under regulatory restrictions, including cap on withdrawals by its customers, after detection of certain financial irregularities, hiding and mis-reporting of loans given to real estate developer HDIL.

The restrictions have been extended several times since then. PMC’s exposure to HDIL was over Rs 6,500 crore or 73 per cent of its total loan book size of Rs 8,880 crore as of September 19, 2019.

Initially, the RBI had allowed depositors to withdraw Rs 1,000 which was later raised to Rs 1 lakh per account to mitigate their difficulties.

In June 2020, the RBI had extended the regulatory restrictions on the cooperative bank by another six months till December 22, 2020.

As of March 31, 2020, PMC Bank”s total deposits stood at Rs 10,727.12 crore and total advances at Rs 4,472.78 crore. Gross non-performance assets of the bank stood at Rs 3,518.89 crore at end-March, 2020.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Rakesh Mohan, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The second wave of COVID-19 may worsen stressed assets in the banking system, adding pressure on the financial stability, said former RBI deputy governor Rakesh Mohan. He said the Indian banking system has been reeling under the pressure of non-performing assets (NPAs) since 2015.

Various resolution measures including Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code were undertaken to bring down NPAs and then COVID-19 hit in 2020 impacting the growth process, he said during a virtual conference organised by India International Centre and Research & Information System for Developing Countries.

Mohan, who served as deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) twice between 2002 and 2009, said “we have more difficult task than other countries because we had a legacy of bad debt before COVID-19”.

As per the Financial Stability Report of December 2020 by RBI, NPA could go up to 13.5 per cent in the later part of this year, he said, adding, “I would imagine that this would be worse because of the second wave…So this is a real challenge for RBI to maintain financial system’s resilience.”

According to a report titled ‘The Response of the Reserve Bank of India to COVID-19: Do Whatever it Takes’ authored by Mohan, despite all the measures implemented to promote the flow of credit to all segments of the market, credit growth has continued to be sluggish except for a significant increase to the SME sector.

“Hence there is a mismatch between the performance of the real sector and financial markets. This could potentially lead to enhanced stresses experienced by both lenders and borrowers, leading to potential financial instability,” the report released earlier this week by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress said.

Thus, he said, financial stability challenges remain for the Indian financial system and its regulator in the months to come.

Mohan’s views come days before RBI’s release of bi-annual Financial Stability Report, which will give investors a clearer picture about the state of India’s banking sector and the outlook.

RBI is slated to come out with the report towards the end of this month.

As per the Financial Stability Report, NPAs of the banking sector were projected to surge to 13.5 per cent of advances by September 2021, from 7.5 per cent in September 2020, under the baseline scenario.

The report had warned that if the macroeconomic environment worsens into a severe stress scenario, the NPA ratio may escalate to 14.8 per cent.

Earlier this year, another former deputy governor H R Khan had observed that non-performing assets (NPAs) or bad loans of public sector banks could cross 18 per cent if there is deterioration in economic activity due to the pandemic.

Mohan further said RBI has been very active before and after COVID-19 and has taken a number of actions to protect financial system from the ravages of the pandemic.

He expressed concern that the number of professionals at RBI in 2020-21 is lower than that in 2007-08.

Compared to any other significant country, he said, the number of professionals at RBI is really small.

There is a need to increase the number of professionals in the central bank in the light of expansion of financial system and transformation of financial space in the last 12-13 years, he observed.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Canara Bank to be lead sponsor of bad bank, to pick up 12% stake

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Board of Canara Bank has given in-principle approval for participating in the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) as a sponsor by taking 12 per cent equity stake.

The Bengaluru-headquartered public sector bank has sought the Reserve Bank of India’s approval for the same, the Bank said in a regulatory filing.

Banks such as State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India and IDBI Bank are expected to take up to 10 per cent stake in NARCL.

Stressed consortium loans (₹500 crore and above) will be transferred to NARCL. Banks have so far identified 22 stressed assets aggregating about ₹89,000 crore for transfer to NARCL.

Overall, stressed loans aggregating up to ₹2 lakh crore are expected to be transferred by Banks to the company.

Padmakumar Madhavan Nair (Chief General Manager with SBI’s Stressed Assets Resolution Group) has been appointed as MD & CEO of NARCL.

In her Union Budget speech on February 1, 2021, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) and an Asset Management Company (AMC) would be set up to consolidate and take over the existing stressed debt and then manage and dispose of the assets to Alternate Investment Funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation.

Indian Banks Association (IBA) is the Nodal Agency for constituting the ARC and AMC, designated as National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) and India Debt Management Company Ltd (IDMCL), respectively.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Subbarao, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The central bank can directly print money and finance the government, but it should avoid doing so unless there is absolutely no alternative, former RBI governor D Subbarao on Wednesday said while pointing out that India is ‘nowhere’ near such a scenario.

In an interview with PTI, Subbarao suggested that to deal with the second wave of COVID-19 induced slowdown in the economy, the government can consider Covid bonds as an option to raise borrowing, not in addition to budgeted borrowing, but as a part of that.

“It (RBI) can (print money) but, it should avoid doing so unless there is absolutely no alternative. For sure, there are times when monetisation – despite its costs – becomes inevitable such as when the government cannot finance its deficit at reasonable rates.

“We are nowhere near such a scenario,” he said.

India’s economy contracted by less-than-expected 7.3 per cent in the fiscal ended March 2021. For 2021-22, the deficit has been put at 6.8 per cent of the GDP, which will be further lowered to 4.5 per cent by 2025-26.

The Reserve Bank has lowered the country’s growth projection for the current financial year to 9.5 per cent from 10.5 per cent estimated earlier, amid the uncertainties created by the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic, while the World Bank on Tuesday projected India’s economy to grow at 8.3 per cent in 2021.

According to Subbarao, when people say the RBI should print money to finance the government’s deficit, they don’t realise that the central bank is printing money even now to finance the deficit, but it is doing so indirectly.

For example, he said, when the Reserve Bank of India buys bonds under its open market operations (OMOs) or buys dollars under its forex operations, it is printing money to pay for those purchases, and that money indirectly goes to finance the government’s borrowing.

“The important difference though is this when RBI is printing money as part of its liquidity operations, it is in the driver’s seat, deciding how much money to print and how to channel it into the system,” the former governor noted.

In contrast, Subbarao said, monetisation is seen as a way of financing the government’s fiscal deficit, with the quantum and timing of money to be printed being decided by the government’s borrowing requirement rather than the RBI’s monetary policy.

“That will be seen as RBI losing control over the money supply, which will erode the credibility of both the RBI and the government with costly macroeconomic implications,” he observed.

The RBI’s monetisation of fiscal deficit means the central bank printing currency for the government to take care of any emergency spending to bridge its fiscal deficit.

Asked whether a Covid bond is an option that the government can consider to raise some borrowing, the former RBI governor said, “It is something worth considering, not in addition to budgeted borrowing, but as a part of that”.

In other words, Subbarao said instead of borrowing in the market, the government could raise a part of its borrowing requirements by issuing Covid bonds to the public.

“Appropriately priced and structured, they can provide relief to savers who are short-changed by the low-interest rates on bank fixed deposits.

“Moreover, such Covid bonds will not add to the money supply and will not, therefore, interfere with RBI’s liquidity management,” he pointed out.

To a question on whether the RBI can generate more profits to help relieve the government’s fiscal stress, Subbarao said the central bank is not a commercial institution and profit-making is not one of its objectives.

According to Subbarao, in the course of its business, the RBI makes some profit and withholds a part of that to meet its expenditure and to build its reserves, and transfers the ‘surplus profit’ to the government.

“How much it can hold back for buffering its reserves is now prescribed by the Bimal Jalan Committee.

“The RBI should not do anything with the express intent of making profits,” he emphasised.

The RBI has transferred Rs 99,122 crore to the government as its surplus profit, nearly twice the budgeted amount.

Asked what else can the RBI do to help the economic recovery, Subbarao said since the pandemic hit us over a year ago, the RBI has acted briskly and innovatively.

“What the RBI can do going forward is what the Governor said in his recent policy statement which is to see that there is an ‘equitable distribution of liquidity, which is to say that the credit support must go to the most distressed sectors,” he noted.

To a question – can the RBI embrace even more unconventional policies, Subbarao said there are limits to what an emerging economy central bank like the RBI can do as compared to rich-country central banks like the Fed or the ECB.

“Developed economies have the policy room and the firepower to throw the kitchen sink at the problem. They borrow in hard currencies, which everyone craves.

“We do not enjoy those comforts. Moreover, markets are less forgiving of excesses by emerging market central banks,” he observed.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PSU banks headed for privatisation may get a major makeover, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The government plans to spruce up public sector banks’ balance sheets through capital support and sale of non-core assets and trim their workforce before putting them on block.

It may also look at transferring bad loans of these lenders to the upcoming bad bank.

On the radar

The NITI Aayog, which has been entrusted with the job of identifyng suitable candidates for the privatisation, has recommended names to a high-level panel headed by Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba.

Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank, Bank of Maharashtra and Bank of India are some of the names that may be considered for privatisation by the Core Group of Secretaries on Disinvestment.

The other members of the high-level panel are Economic Affairs Secretary, Revenue Secretary, Expenditure Secretary, Corporate Affairs Secretary, Secretary Legal Affairs, Secretary Department of Public Enterprises, Secretary Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) and the Secretary of administrative department.

Following clearance from the Core Group of Secretaries, the finalised names will go to the Alternative Mechanism (AM) for its approval and eventually to the Cabinet headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the final nod.

VRS scheme

Two state-owned banks being picked up for privatisation by the government are likely to come out with an attractive voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) to get rid of the extra flab.

An attractive VRS will make them lean and fit for takeover by the private sector entities that are keen to enter the banking space, the sources said.

VRS is not forced exit but an option for those who would like to take early retirement with a good financial package, the sources said adding that it has been done in the past before the consolidation of some of the PSBs.

Out of PCA?

State-owned UCO Bank is hopeful of coming out of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework very soon.

PCA is triggered when banks breach certain regulatory requirements such as return on asset, minimum capital, and quantum of the non-performing asset.

The bank had also met the other major criteria including net NPA norm, Goel said. Net NPA was at 3.4 per cent in March quarter against requirement of below six per cent. Return on Asset is also positive at Rs 167 crore and latest leverage ratio stood at 4.53 against a requirement of four per cent.

The government in the last round had infused Rs 14,500 crore of equity in Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank, Bank of India, and UCO Bank by issuing non-interest-bearing, non-transferable bonds to these state-owned lenders.

Central Bank had narrowed its loss to Rs 888 crore in FY21, from Rs 1,121 crore in FY20. IOB, which is yet to declare its results for Q4 of FY21, posted a profit of Rs 482 crore for the nine months to December 2020, as against a loss of Rs 8,527 crore for FY20. gross non-performing asset (NPA) for Central Bank are 16.55 percent while for IOB they are 12.19 percent.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI nod for Ghosh’s re-appointment as Bandhan Bank MD and CEO for three years, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bandhan Bank has received RBI nod to re-appoint Chandra Shekhar Ghosh as its MD and CEO for three years, lower than the five-year tenure approved by the company’s board in November last year. “The Reserve Bank of India vide its communicated dated June 8, 2021, has granted approval for re-appointment of Chandra Shekhar Ghosh, Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer (MD&CEO) of the bank, for a period of three years, with effect from July 10, 2021,” the lender said in a regulatory filing on Tuesday.

On November 2, 2020, the board of the bank had approved re-appointment of Ghosh as the MD and CEO for a period of five years with effect from July 10, 2021, subject to approval of the RBI and shareholders.

Ghosh’s current term comes to an end on July 9, 2021.

With 30 years of experience in microfinance and development, Ghosh had set up Bandhan as an NGO in April 2001 and it was converted into an NBFC later.

Subsequently, it was established as a universal bank in August 2015 after getting licence from the RBI.

The Kolkata-headquartered lender earlier in September 2018 was barred by the RBI from expanding its branch network. The RBI had also freezed Ghosh’s remuneration as the lender failed to comply with a licensing condition that required cutting down promoters’ stake to 40 per cent, from close to 82 per cent, within three years of commencing operations.

The restrictions on expansion were lifted in February 2020 by the RBI even as the bank was not in compliance with the licensing condition, given the efforts made by the lender to comply with the guidelines. It had reduced the promoters’ stake to 62 per cent by then.

RBI had lifted the regulatory restriction on branch opening, on the condition that the bank ensured that at least 25 per cent of the total number of banking outlets opened during a financial year were in unbanked rural centres.

The curbs on Ghosh’s remuneration were lifted in mid-August 2020.

According to RBI’s bank licence norms, a private sector bank’s promoter will need to pare holding to 40 per cent within three years, 20 per cent within 10 years and to 15 per cent within 15 years.

Bandhan had merged with mortgage lender HDFC’s low-value home loan company Gruh Finance in order to reduce the promoter ownership to the 60 per cent level from the earlier 82 per cent.

Bandhan is the first bank in India which has been transformed from a microfinance institution.

As of March 31, 2021, the promoter and promoter group shareholding in Bandhan Bank stands reduced to 39.99 per cent, as per data on BSE.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI imposes Rs 6 cr penalty on BoI, PNB, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The RBI on Monday imposed penalty aggregating to Rs 6 crore on Bank of India and Punjab National Bank for contravention of norms, including one related to “Frauds – Classification and Reporting”.

A penalty of Rs 4 crore has been imposed on Bank of India and Rs 2 crore on Punjab National Bank.

In a statement, the RBI said the statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (lSE) of Bank of India was conducted with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2019.

The bank had also conducted a review and submitted a Fraud Monitoring Report (FMR) dated January 1, 2019 pertaining to detection of fraud in an account.

Examination of the risk assessment report pertaining to the ISE and the FMR revealed non-compliance with/contravention of directions, viz., breach of stipulated transaction limits; delay in transfer of unclaimed balances to DEA Fund; delay in reporting a fraud to RBI and sale of a fraudulent asset, the statement said.

In a separate statement, the Reserve Bank said the statutory ISE of Punjab National Bank was conducted with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2018 (ISE 2018) and March 31, 2019 (ISE 2019).

The examination of the risk assessment reports pertaining to ISE 2018 and 2019 revealed non-compliance with/contravention of the aforesaid directions, viz., delay in reporting of frauds and not ensuring data accuracy and integrity while submitting data on CRILC platform/ to RBI, it said.

In both cases, notices were issued to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on them for such violations of the directions.

The RBI, however, added that the penalties have been imposed based on the deficiencies in regulatory compliance and are not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into them with their customers.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Crisil fears large companies will benefit from RBI sops for contact-intensive sectors, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Leading domestic ratings agency Crisil on Friday said feared risk aversion among banks may lead to only the large companies benefitting under the Rs 15,000-crore on-tap liquidity window for contact-intensive sectors announced earlier in the day. The Reserve Bank of India‘s (RBI) aggregate debt-eligibility thresholds for small enterprises to avail loan recasts takes the total number of entities able to access the facility to two-thirds of the rated mid-size portfolio, it said.

Earlier in the day, the RBI relaxed the eligibility criteria for the restructuring window offered under the Resolution Framework 2.0 to Rs 50 crore. Earlier, only half of the rated companies were eligible for the package when the loan eligibility threshold was set at Rs 25 crore. It also launched the Rs 15,000-crore liquidity facility.

The on-tap liquidity window for contact-intensive sectors such as hospitality, travel and tourism, and aviation ancillary services, which have borne the brunt of the second wave of the pandemic, is timely also, the agency said.

“There is a possibility that only large existing borrowers in contact-intensive sectors actually benefit from this on-tap liquidity window as banks may have greater comfort with them,” the agency said.

In the current environment, it is possible that a number of banks could be risk-averse and the benefit of on-tap liquidity facility may not, therefore, reach the smaller and lower-rated companies in these sectors fully, it said.

A clarity will emerge once the banks come out with their updated policies after the RBI announcement. Crisil will monitor the impact of the development on its rated credits on a case-to-case basis, it said.

Crisil said it rates 6,800 mid-size companies, excluding those engaged in the financial sector, and 4,700 of those are small and medium enterprises (SMEs), having bank loan exposure of up to Rs 50 crore and were standard accounts as of March 2021.

“The RBI’s relaxation in overall bank exposure threshold is timely, as it now increases the coverage of stressed companies that typically have weaker credit profiles,” its Chief Rating Officer Subodh Rai said.

Rai added that three out of four companies eligible for restructuring have sub-investment category ratings, indicating their relatively weak ability to manage liquidity shocks, he added.

Rescheduling of loan repayments under the restructuring 2.0 window will provide interim relief to these companies against such liquidity shocks, he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of India posts Q4 profit of ₹250 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai, June 4

Bank of India (BoI) reported a standalone net profit of ₹250 crore in the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2021 against a net loss of ₹3,571 crore in the year ago quarter. The profit came on the back of a rise in other income and lower non-performing asset (NPA) provisions.

Net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) was down 23 per cent y-o-y at ₹2,936 crore (₹3,793 crore). Other income, including income from non-fund based activities such as commission, exchange, brokerage, fees, forex income, profit/ loss on sale of investments, and recovery from written off accounts, rose 22 per cent to ₹2,053 crore (₹1,688 crore).

Also read: Bank of India net rises to ₹541 crore in Q3

Loan loss provisions were 58 per cent lower y-o-y at ₹3,089 crore (₹7,316 crore).

Decline in NPAs

Gross NPAs declined to 13.77 per cent of gross advances as at March-end 2021 against 14.78 per cent as at March-end 2020. Net NPAs declined to 3.35 per cent of net advances as at March-end 2021 against 3.88 per cent as at March-end 2020.

Global net interest margin declined to 2.01 per cent as at March-end 2021 against 2.90 per cent as at March-end 2020.

Global deposits increased by 13 per cent y-o-y to ₹6,27,113 crore. Global advances nudged up 1.46 per cent y-o-y to ₹4,10,436 crore, mainly on the back growth in domestic retail, agriculture and MSME advances, and Government & Government-guaranteed advances.

During the quarter the total reduction in NPAs was higher at ₹5,830 crore (₹2,944 crore). About 81 per cent of this reduction was on account of write-offs.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 4 5 6 7 8 10