A ₹2-lakh crore worth of debt looms over new bad bank

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A bad bank in India that’s expected to launch this month may help reduce one of the world’s worst bad-loan piles, but market participants say it’s a long path ahead.

The new institution, which is set to start operations by the end of June, is likely to handle stressed debt worth ₹2 lakh crore ($27 billion) over time, according to a BloombergQuint report. That would be about a quarter of the nation’s non-performing debt load. By housing bad loans of many lenders under one roof, the entity should help speed up decision-making and improve bargaining power when resolving these assets.

 

But for India to overcome its struggles with bad debt and stabilize the financial system of Asia’s third-largest economy, more fundamental problems with insolvency laws introduced in 2016 need to be addressed, investors say. Their confidence in the country’s bankruptcy reforms has been shaken as creditors’ recovery rates fall, delays in closing cases increase, and liquidations exceed resolutions in the insolvency courts.

Market participants will watch whether the bad bank focuses on resolving the assets rather than keeping them like a warehouse, and whether its team includes appropriate industry and turnaround experts.

 

“The proposed bad bank is useful as a one-time clean-up exercise of the bad loans that are pending resolution for years now,” said Raj Kumar Bansal, managing director at Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. “But it’s not a long-term solution in dealing with the stressed assets,” he said, adding that bankruptcy reform is key.

Less than one in 10 companies admitted in the insolvency courts is getting resolved while a third are facing liquidation, data compiled by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India show. The recoveries for financiers from the resolved cases have also dropped to 39 per cent of dues as of March from 46 per cent a year earlier. And if the top nine cases by recovery are excluded, lenders received just 24% of dues, according to Macquarie Capital.

Bankruptcy reforms

“India’s bankruptcy reforms started off well but they have slowed currently,” said Nikhil Shah, managing director at Alvarez & Marsal India. “Prolonged delays in resolutions, lengthy court battles, and uncertainty of recoveries post-approval of resolution plans are pushing many potential investors away” from the bankruptcy process, he said.

 

Shah expects the delays in resolutions to worsen further unless the government and judiciary address some of the primary issues, such as increasing the number of judges and investing in digital infrastructure to boost productivity.

Indian Banks’ Association, which is helping with plans for the proposed bad bank, and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, didn’t immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

For now, Indian banks will be happy to finally kick away some of the stressed loans to the proposed entity. The sector’s bad-loan ratio is set to almost double to 13.5 per cent of total advances by the end of September, India’s central bank said in a report published before the second wave of coronavirus infections hit the country.

“Stressed loans have taken far too much management time across the industry in the past couple of years,” Prashant Kumar, chief executive officer at Yes Bank Ltd., told Bloomberg. “This bad bank will help shift focus from resolving soured loans to improving credit growth.”

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

All PSBs, REC to buy stakes in bad bank; Indian Banks’ Association files application for incorporation of NARCL

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A top banker had last week said the cost to the exchequer won’t exceed Rs 30,600 crore, as estimated by the IBA, as the prospects of recovery from some of the bad loans looked promising.

The Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) has filed an application with the corporate affairs ministry for the incorporation of the National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL), which will pave the way for its swift operationalisation, banking sources told FE.

Not just large lenders but all public-sector banks (PSBs), barring Punjab & Sind Bank, have evinced interest in picking up stakes in the so-called bad bank, one of the sources said.

The IBA – which is spearheading the initiative to set up the NARCL – has also held talks with REC, seeking its contribution to equity, he added. “The discussions with REC (which finances rural electrification projects) have been moving towards a positive outcome,” the source said. No private bank has yet agreed to put in capital but talks are still on.

While Canara Bank has announced it would be the sponsor of the NARCL and hold a 12% equity, other large banks are expected to pick up just about 10% each. Punjab National Bank (PNB) managing director and chief executive SS Mallikarjun Rao has said his bank would hold under 10% in the bad bank, while Union Bank of India MD & CEO and IBA chairman Rajkiran Rao G has said the lender would buy 9%. PNB and Union Bank have identified bad loans worth about Rs 8,000 crore and Rs 7,800 crore, respectively, for transfer to the NARCL.

Meanwhile, the IBA has finalised the article of association as well as memorandum of association for the NARCL so that the asset reconstruction company takes off quickly.

Sources had earlier told FE that the finance ministry could soon seek Cabinet approval for a plan to offer sovereign guarantee on the security receipts (SRs) issued by the NARCL while acquiring bad loans from lenders. This would cost the government Rs 30,600 crore over five years.

A top banker had last week said the cost to the exchequer won’t exceed Rs 30,600 crore, as estimated by the IBA, as the prospects of recovery from some of the bad loans looked promising.

Though the government has backed the setting up of the NARCL, announced in the Budget for FY22, it wouldn’t infuse capital into it; instead, participating banks would put in the equity. Nevertheless, it is set to give guarantee on the SRs to make the bad loan resolution process more viable and attractive.

An asset management company, comprising professionals, will also be set up within the broader NARCL structure, which will work out the toxic assets and take appropriate decisions, including on selling them off to investors.

Financial services secretary Debasish Panda had earlier said banks would have the option to transfer several large stressed assets (of at least Rs 500 crore each) worth Rs 2.25 lakh crore to NARCL initially. The IBA is also working out an “exit strategy” for those accounts that remain unresolved even after five years.

Of the 101 non-performing assets (NPAs) initially reviewed, banks have zeroed in on 22 accounts amounting to roughly Rs 89,000 crore for transfer to NARCL in the first phase.

NARCL is expected to acquire stressed assets at net book value by offering 15% of it upfront (in cash), and the rest (85%) in SRs. Once the bad loan is resolved, realisation for the relevant bank would be in sync with its SR interest in that asset.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bad bank: Govt guarantee seen costing Rs 30,600 crore

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Of the 101 non-performing assets (NPAs) initially reviewed, banks have zeroed in on 22 accounts amounting to roughly Rs 89,000 crore for transfer to NARCL in the first phase.

The Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) has estimated that the government may have to fork out not more than Rs 30,600 crore if it offers guarantee on the security receipts (SRs) issued by the National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL) while acquiring bad loans from lenders, a top banker told FE.

“The prospects of recovery from some of the bad loans look promising. So, government guarantee on SRs, subject to its approval, may not cost more than this amount. Details are being worked out by the IBA, and NARCL will be operationalised soon,” he said.

Although the government backed the setting up of NARCL, it wouldn’t infuse capital into it; instead, participating banks would put in the equity. Nevertheless, bankers expect the government to give guarantee on the SRs, which will make the resolution process more viable and attractive.

Earlier, financial services secretary Debasish Panda had said banks would have the option to transfer several large stressed assets (of at least Rs 500 crore each) worth Rs 2.25 lakh crore to NARCL initially.

The IBA, which is spearheading efforts to establish NARCL, has zeroed in on five consultants to expedite the process. It has sought quotations from SBI Capital Markets and Oliver Wyman for advisory services; from E&Y for tax consultations; AZB & Partners for legal consultations; and AON Consulting for HR services.

NARCL is expected to acquire stressed assets at net book value by offering 15% of it upfront (in cash), and the rest (85%) in SRs. Once the bad loan is resolved, realisation for the relevant bank would be in sync with its SR interest in that asset.

The IBA is also working out an “exit strategy” for those accounts that remain unresolved even after five years, said the banker.

Of the 101 non-performing assets (NPAs) initially reviewed, banks have zeroed in on 22 accounts amounting to roughly Rs 89,000 crore for transfer to NARCL in the first phase.

Already, the IBA has formed a core committee headed by its chairman (Union Bank of India managing director Rajkiran Rai) for setting up NARCL and the Indian Asset Management Company. The committee also comprises IBA chief executive Sunil Mehta, State Bank of India MD J Swaminathan, IDBI Bank MD and CEO Rakesh Sharma and ICICI Bank executive director Sandeep Batra.

The proposed asset management company, comprising professionals, will be set up within the broader NARCL structure that will work out the toxic assets and take appropriate decisions, including on selling them off to investors.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Canara Bank to be lead sponsor of bad bank, to pick up 12% stake

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Board of Canara Bank has given in-principle approval for participating in the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) as a sponsor by taking 12 per cent equity stake.

The Bengaluru-headquartered public sector bank has sought the Reserve Bank of India’s approval for the same, the Bank said in a regulatory filing.

Banks such as State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India and IDBI Bank are expected to take up to 10 per cent stake in NARCL.

Stressed consortium loans (₹500 crore and above) will be transferred to NARCL. Banks have so far identified 22 stressed assets aggregating about ₹89,000 crore for transfer to NARCL.

Overall, stressed loans aggregating up to ₹2 lakh crore are expected to be transferred by Banks to the company.

Padmakumar Madhavan Nair (Chief General Manager with SBI’s Stressed Assets Resolution Group) has been appointed as MD & CEO of NARCL.

In her Union Budget speech on February 1, 2021, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) and an Asset Management Company (AMC) would be set up to consolidate and take over the existing stressed debt and then manage and dispose of the assets to Alternate Investment Funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation.

Indian Banks Association (IBA) is the Nodal Agency for constituting the ARC and AMC, designated as National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) and India Debt Management Company Ltd (IDMCL), respectively.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Will the proposed Bad Bank cure India’s banking sector? Here’s how it may shape up

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The earlier FSR released in January 2021 had projected that the gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) of banks may rise to 13.5% by September 2021 in the baseline scenario.

By Nitin Jain

In Feb 2021, RBI announced a structure for a proposed bad bank, “What you call a bad bank is not really that; an ARC-type entity will be set up to take over bad loans from the books of public sector banks and it will try to resolve just like any other ARC,” RBI Governor Shatikanta Das had said.

Proposed Structure of Bad Bank

Though no formal structure has been announced yet, we understand basis news reports, that a National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL) is going to be set up to take over NPAs from banks. The Promoters are likely to be power finance companies while the PSU banks will hold the remaining equity stake in the ARC. As per recent news reports, state-owned banks have shortlisted 28 loan accounts to be transferred to the NARCL with a total of Rs 82,500 crore of loans due, and further loans could also be transferred such that the AUM is over Rs 2 lakh crore. The list of borrowers includes big names such as Videocon Oil Ventures Limited (VOVL), Amtek Auto, Reliance Naval, Jaypee Infratech, Castex Technologies, GTL, Visa Steel, Wind World, Lavasa Corporation, Ruchi Worldwide, Consolidated Construction.

Normally the NPA loans at the time of takeover by an ARC are valued around 30-40% of the principal amount. However, as we understand from news sources, in the case of NARCL the loans may be acquired at the current book value. The NARCL would pay 15% in cash and the balance 85% in security receipts or any other proportion as they may decide. Further, the government would provide a guarantee to the security receipts issued by the bad bank. Let’s assume that a bank sells a loan of Rs 100 to NARCL. Now, if the Bank has already made 75% provisions for the loan, then the book value of this loan is Rs 25, and 15% of Rs 25  i.e. Rs 3.75 is cash to be paid to banks. Thus, using these assumptions, for taking over say Rs 2 lakh crore of bad loans, a cash outflow of Rs 7,500 crores and issuance of SRs worth Rs 42,500 crore may be required. (Please note that these assumptions have been taken for the purpose of explaining this concept only and are not indicative or confirmatory in any nature).

Pros and Cons of the Proposed Bad Bank Structure

Pros
-Cleans the balance sheet of the banks.
-Will provide immediate relief to the banking system which will now be facing fresh NPA on account of disruption due to Covid.
-Banks will become capitalized and ready for fresh lending.
-Faster decision making by one body (NARCL) v/s Consortium of banks.
-A secondary market can be created for the SRs which have a sovereign backing, that would provide further liquidity to the banks.

Con
The actual recovery of these loans may be lower than the book value of the loans transferred, thereby could lead to erosion of capital at NARCL over the medium and long term.
-If NARCL will need to take decisive, focused steps to recover these loans, otherwise the process may not be successful.
-The process entails transferring the bad loans at current date, and recovery or resolution to happen in future.
-May lead to aggressive fresh lending by Banks.

Taking control of management of these companies from the Promoters. The RBI had demonstrated effective management of DHFL, by taking over the board and appointing an administrator to manage the company and find a resolution.However, a Bad Bank, or even a network of bad banks, will not make the losses disappear. The losses, or non-performing loans, transferred to a bad bank will still exist. The process may allow better recovery of these loans in future. It will be important for the banks to review their lending policies and put in place a robust risk management system.  Further, it would be crucial to see how NARCL will manage these bad assets. I believe that one will require specialized expertise for recovery of these bad assets such as:

-Interim Crisis Management in these Companies – restructuring, reducing costs, identifying surplus assets and to sell these assets to generate liquidity, and providing transparent and clear communications to all stakeholders.
-Classification of bad loans by sector. The Government already has significant expertise in the Road/ Highways and Power Sector via its Undertakings. However, expertise may need to be built in other sectors via sector experts to facilitate day-to-day management of the operations of the company and to find a viable resolution to preserve value.
-Provisioning policies of NARCL will need to be reviewed such that they are in accordance with the tenor/ maturity of the SRs issued.
-NARCL will need to take a decision as to the route to be taken for recovery from the bad loan. Some potential routes could be: 

    1. Initiating corporate insolvency process on the Company
    2. Engaging an investment banker to pursue mergers and acquisitions transaction for the said asset.
    3. Undertake a compromise or settlement u/s 230 of Companies Act.

Though the ‘Bad Bank’ appears to be a sweet pill for the banking sector to get rid of their immediate problems, it would be a tough task ahead for the proposed NARCL to preserve the tax- payers’ monies over the medium and longer term.

(Nitin Jain is a veteran corporate and investment banker having worked in banks like Standard Chartered Bank and Bank of America. He is a Restructuring Expert and is also an Insolvency Professional registered with IBBI. The views expressed in the above article are the author’s personal views.)

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Public sector banks list Rs 82,500 crore NPAs for bad bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public sector banks have shortlisted 28 loan accounts to be transferred to the National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARCL). Of these, lead banks have completed the process of obtaining approval from co-lenders in 22 accounts with Rs 82,500 crore of loans due. Within this amount, borrowers such as VOVL, Amtek Auto, Reliance Naval, Jaypee Infratech, Castex Technologies, GTL, Visa Steel and Wind World account for 80%.

Other large companies that are to be sold to the NARCL include Lavasa Corporation, Ruchi Worldwide, Consolidated Construction and a few toll projects.

According to banking sources, work is progressing on multiple fronts to ensure that the bad bank starts operations as soon as possible. On Wednesday, bankers met to finalise the capital structure of the bad bank (NARCL). Sources said that the company would need at least Rs 6,000-crore capital of equity and debt to start operations. In terms of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regulations, asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) must pay 15% of the purchase consideration in cash upfront. Even if these 22 non-performing assets (NPAs) were valued at 50% of the loan amount, the ARCs would have to pay over Rs 12,000 crore to banks. The NARCL can, however, raise money on its own.

Since all these 28 loans have been fully provided for, any consideration that the banks receive will go into their bottom line as profit. Once the capital structure is finalised, the promoters will seek a licence from the RBI. Lenders have decided to ask power finance companies to be the promoters as most other large lenders have a stake in existing ARCs. While all banks will hold just below 10% stake, Canara Bank and Bank of Maharashtra will hold just over 10% and may be given promoter status. Most other large banks will contribute to the ARCs’ equity. The articles of association of the NARC have already been finalised. Simultaneously, lenders are also discussing the setup of the asset management company that will do the recovery work. Lenders are hopeful of completing the loan transfer to the NARCL in July.

Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman had announced in the Budget the setting up of a bad bank (NARCL) to acquire the NPAs from banks. The NARCL was to be in the public sector so that lenders do not have any problems in selling their bad loans. The NARCL would pay 15% in cash and the balance in security receipts, which are similar to units in a mutual fund with the consolidated bad loan being the underlying asset. The government would provide a guarantee to the security receipts issued by the bad bank, which would improve their valuation.

Besides the loans having been fully provided for, the other requirement was that each loan should be above Rs 500 crore. Also, loans that were classified as fraud or were in the midst of a liquidation process were not eligible. Many of these large accounts are undergoing recovery proceedings by banks and buyers have shown interest in these companies. The consolidation of loans will enable faster decision-making by the NARCL.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

SBI Chairman Dinesh Khara explains rolling out RBI’s 5-May SME loan relief measures; ECLGS extended

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State Bank of India’s (SBI) Chairman Dinesh Khara talked about loans for SMEs, Covid-19 resurgence, and RBI’s relief measures of 5 May 2021 in a press conference on May 30, 2021.

SBI Press Conference HIGHLIGHTS: State Bank of India’s (SBI) Chairman Dinesh Khara talked about loans for SMEs, Covid-19 resurgence, and RBI’s relief measures of 5 May 2021 in a press conference on May 30, 2021. Chairman Khara explained how RBI’s SME loan relief measures, which were announced on May 5, 2021, will be rolled out. He informed that PSBs have formulated templated approach for restructuring loans to individuals, small businesses and MSMEs up to Rs 25 crore. In order to approach bank for resolution, customers can file an application on the portal at the bank website, they can make manual submission of applications at the branch. Khara also informed that government will provide 100 per cent guarantee cover to loans up to Rs 2 crore to hospitals/nursing homes etc for setting up on-site oxygen generation plants, interest rate capped at 7.5%. The validity of ECLGS has also been extended to September 30, 2021, or till guarantees for an amount of Rs 3 lakh crore is issued. The disbursement under the scheme has been permitted up to December 31, 2021.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bad bank to kick off with 80 NPAs worth Rs 2 lakh crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks are likely to transfer about 80 large NPA accounts for the resolution to National Asset Recons­tru­ct­ion Com­pany (NARCL), which is expected to be operational by next month.

NARCL is the name coined for the bad bank announced in the Budget 2021-22. A bad bank refers to a financial institution that takes over the bad assets of lenders and undertakes resolution.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in the Budget 2021-22 announced that the high level of provisioning by public sector banks of their stressed assets calls for measures to clean up the bank books. “An Asset Recon­struction Company Limited and Asset Management Com­pany would be set up to consolidate and take over the existing stressed debt,” she had said in the Budget speech.

Last year, the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) had made a proposal for the creation of a bad bank for swift resolution of non-performing assets (NPAs). The government accepted the proposal and decided to go for ARC and asset management company (AMC) model for this.

The process

The size of each of these NPAs accounts is over Rs 500 crore and the banks have identified about 70-80 such accounts to be transferred to the proposed bad bank, sources said. It is expected that NPAs over Rs 2 lakh crore will move out of the books of the banks to the bad bank.

The company will pick up those assets that are 100 per cent provided for by the lenders. It will then manage and dispose of the assets to alternate investment funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation.

NARCL will pay up to 15 per cent of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85 per cent would be government-guaranteed security receipts.

The government guarantee would be invoked if there is a loss against the threshold value.

The loans identified by the Indian Banks’ Association include NPAs in a variety of industries — including oil, steel, cement and roads, with many admitted under the insolvency process. These loans are almost fully provided for over the years and they exclude the ones where there is fraud involved or those currently under liquidation. About 75% of the lenders by value need to approve to transfer the loans to an ARC.

No fraud loans

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that loans classified as fraud cannot be sold to NARCL. As per the annual report of the RBI, about 1.9 lakh crore of loans have been classified as fraud as of March 2020.

To facilitate the smooth functioning of asset reconstruction companies, the RBI last month decided to set up a panel to undertake a comprehensive review of the working of such institutions.

After enactment of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act in 2002, regulatory guidelines for ARCs were issued in 2003 to enable the development of this sector and to facilitate the smooth functioning of these companies.

Since then, while ARCs have grown in number and size, their potential for resolving stressed assets is yet to be realised fully.

The bad bank

Nine banks and two non-bank lenders, including the State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB) and Bank of Baroda (BoB), are coming together to jointly invest Rs 7,000 crore of initial capital in a proposed bad bank that aims to help extract funds stuck in bad loans. Two other state-run financiers of power projects will also own stock in the bad bank.

Canara Bank, Union Bank of India and Bank of India will join their larger state-run peers as investors in the bad bank. ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Life Insurance Corp of India-owned IDBI Bank are also among the shareholders. State-owned Power Finance Corp and Rural Electrification Corp will also be equal shareholders in the new company.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Power finance companies likely to be promoters of the bad bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The National Asset Reconstruction Company (NARC), or the bad bank, is likely to be promoted by Power Finance Corporation and Rural Electrification Corporation.

While all major public sector banks will invest in the NARC, they will be holding a stake of below 10%. The power finance companies will hold more than 10%

The Reserve Bank of India is reluctant to allow banks to float another ARC to which they will sell their bad loans.

Padmakumar M Nair, Chief General Manager of Stressed Assets Resolution Group at SBI, will head the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd, the proposed bad bank for taking over stressed assets of lenders.

Nair has been picked up for the CEO post of the proposed bad bank NARCL as he has a long exposure of handling resolution of stressed assets. He will be joining the company on a deputation basis for the moment. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in the budget for 2021-22 had announced that an asset reconstruction company or a bad bank would be set up to consolidate and take over existing stressed assets of lenders and undertake their resolution. A bad bank refers to a financial institution that takes over the bad assets of lenders and undertakes resolution.

Most of the large public sector banks in India have a stake in an existing ARC. SBI is the largest shareholder in Arcil with IDBI Bank, ICICI Bank and Punjab National Bank holding a significant stake. Another firm Asrec is owned by Indian Bank, Bank of India, Union Bank and LIC.

The bad bank

Nine banks and two non-bank lenders, including the State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB) and Bank of Baroda (BoB), are coming together to jointly invest Rs 7,000 crore of initial capital in a proposed bad bank that aims to help extract funds stuck in bad loans. Two other state-run financiers of power projects will also own stock in the bad bank.

Canara Bank, Union Bank of India and Bank of India will join their larger state-run peers as investors in the bad bank. ICICI Bank, Axis Bank and Life Insurance Corp of India-owned IDBI Bank are also among the shareholders. State-owned Power Finance Corp and Rural Electrification Corp will also be equal shareholders in the new company.

The asset transfer

The Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) has identified 102 corporate bad loans, totalling to Rs 2 lakh crore, where the amount outstanding in each is over Rs 500 crore that can be transferred to the proposed National Asset Reconstruction company (NARC) or bad bank.

It has asked its member banks asked members to identify large loans where they are lead bankers and get approval from co-lenders so that these loans can be sold to a National Asset Reconstruction company.

The loans identified by IBA include NPAs in a variety of industries — including oil, steel, cement and roads, with many admitted under the insolvency process. These loans are almost fully provided for over the years and they exclude the ones where there is fraud involved or those currently under liquidation. About 75% of the lenders by value need to approve to transfer the loans to an ARC.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Allow us to sell bad loans back to defaulting promoters, ARCs tell RBI, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As the government gears up to roll out National Asset Reconstruction company or bad bank, next month, asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) have sought more leeway from the banking regulator.

They have asked the RBI to let them sell assets of defaulting promoters back to them and want corporates and high net worth individuals to be allowed to invest in troubled loans through the securities issued by ARCs.

Level-playing field

Responding to the RBI’s call for suggestions to overhaul their structure in the country, it has said that special regulatory dispensation/benefit if any given to proposed ARC should apply to all existing ARCs and level playing field from the regulatory perspective be given to all existing ARCs.

ARCs were allowed to sell bad loans back to defaulting promoters under the SARFAESI Act. However, it was disallowed under the IBC clause, which has hampered the ARCs.

ARCs have asked for this minimum investment to be brought down to 2.5% in cases where the bank selling the bad loan is not the investor. Other suggestions include a request to be classified as non-banking financial companies, which will enable ARCs to borrow from banks.

Bad bank

National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL), the name coined for the bad bank announced in the Budget 2021-22, is expected to be operational in June.Bad bank refers to a financial institution that takes over bad assets of lenders and undertakes resolution.

The new entity is being created in collaboration with both public and private sector banks.

NARCL will take over identified bad loans of lenders. The lead bank with offer in hand of NARCL will go for a ‘Swiss Challenge’, where other asset reconstruction players will be invited to better the offer made by a chosen bidder for finding higher valuation of an NPA on sale.

The company will pick up those assets that are 100 per cent provided for by the lenders, he added.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Budget 2021-22 announced that the high level of provisioning by public sector banks of their stressed assets calls for measures to clean up the bank books.

“An Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Asset Management Company would be set up to consolidate and take over the existing stressed debt,” she had said in the Budget speech. It will then manage and dispose of the assets to alternate investment funds and other potential investors for eventual value realisation, she added.

Last year, IBA had made a proposal for creation of a bad bank for swift resolution of non-performing assets (NPAs). The government accepted the proposal and decided to go for asset reconstruction company (ARC) and asset management company (AMC) model for this.

Mehta further said NARCL will pay up to 15 per cent of the agreed value for the loans in cash and the remaining 85 per cent would be government-guaranteed security receipts.

The government guarantee would be invoked if there is loss against the threshold value, he added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 2 3 4 5