AIBEA wants director posts filled in all public sector banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has urged the finance ministry to expedite steps to fill the vacant posts of directors in nationalised banks. It claimed that the bank boards were functioning with skeletal strength.

CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBEA, said in a letter to Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, that 52 per cent of the director posts in the 11 nationalised banks were vacant.

The vacancies would defeat the purpose of these important posts — namely, taking care of the varied interests of banking operations, he said.

FM unveils EASE 4.0 for PSB’s tech transformation

“It also runs counter to the much-professed principles of good governance,” he said.

According to the association, the posts of Workman Director and Officer Director, representing the employees and officers of the banks, respectively, were incorporated in 1970 and had remained filled for 44 years without interruption.

Since 2014, however, when the NDA government came to power, these posts have stayed vacant, the letter added.

PSBs to make additional provision of over ₹21,300 cr for higher family pension, NPS

Venkatachalam emphasised that the association had submitted a panel of names to the banks concerned and the government, as prescribed, but none had been appointed all these years.

The association has learnt that the names it proposed “have been duly recommended by the concerned Banks to the Department of Financial Services in the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, and all these proposals and recommendations are pending consideration by the Government”, he wrote.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Central authority needed to vet write-off, compromise proposals: AIBEA

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has called for the setting up of a Central authority, comprising retired bankers with credit knowledge and integrity, under the auspices of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to vet the proposals for write-off and compromise.

The authorities or the Committees that have sanctioned loans must not have the powers to write-off the same, according to CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBEA. “The (public sector) banks are bleeding because of the problem of bad loans and huge write-offs and provisioning are being made year after year from out of the operating profits,” he said.

Also read: Delay in insolvency resolution continues to be cause for concern

As per the Association, in 2019, bad loan write-offs by banks amounted to ₹1,83,391 crore and the amount transferred from operating profits as provisions for bad loans/ NPAs (Non-Performing Assets) was at ₹2,29,852 crore.

‘Compromise’ proposals

Venkatachalam emphasised that all write-off proposals beyond a particular limit should be disposed off by the Central Authority constituted specifically for the purpose. Further, “compromise” proposals should be screened at the highest levels. He alleged that going by present day experience, these so-called “compromise proposals” are nothing but camouflage and cover-up of collusive acts.

“Willful bank loan default should be treated as a criminal offence… personal guarantees/ assets of the borrowers including directors of the corporate sector should be attachable for recovery of bank loan dues as has been held by the Supreme Court of India,” Venkatachalam said.

In a representation to the RBI’s committee on the functioning of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs), AIBEA said, “Looking to ARCs’ track record, recovery performance, and the loss borne by the banks on bad debts handled by ARCs, we are very clear that ARCs are not required but stringent laws should be enacted to recover all willful defaults at a relatively quick-time.”

Also read: Private sector banks increased share in deposits, credit at the cost of PSBs in FY21:

The Association suggested that banks should be banned from lending to a company or group of companies, which defaulted and whose account has become a NPA in a particular bank. “The loans of such groups in other banks should also be treated as NPA and should be recalled by the banks. This, we feel, would enable speedy recovery of willfully defaulted corporate loans,” Venkatachalam said.

‘No participation’

The company or group of companies should not also be allowed to participate in the auction for purchase of assets of other defaulting company or group of companies that are brought through SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002) or ARCs.

The Association said in case of ARCs, as far as the Public Sector Banks are concerned, the amount of discount with which a bad loan is sold, the discounted amount should be replenished by the government of India as they are the primary owners of these banks.

Also read: Bank credit growth declines to 5.6 per cent in March

“The present system of sharing recovery on water-fall structure has to change. At present, ARC recovers first its legal and resolution expenses and then management fees and thereafter the recovery is shared in the agreed ratios. This needs to be changed to proportionate sharing of all the items so as to keep the ARC driving recovery,” Venkatachalam said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Merge RRBs with sponsor banks, AIBEA urges Finance Minister, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Chennai, The merger of Regional Rural Banks (RRB) with their sponsor banks would avoid business cannibalization and reduction in administrative overheads, the All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) said on Monday.

In a letter to Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, AIBEA General Secretary C.H. Venkatachalam said instead of further reforms in the RRB sector, it would be better to merge them with their sponsor banks as this will add to the rural network of the latter and at the same time, eliminate the weaknesses that they suffer presently.

“Monitoring would be much more effective since they would become part of the bank and come under the direct control of the management of the sponsor banks. This would also obviate a lot of administrative overheads and expenses,” he said.

While the objectives of RRB are laudable, their very nature of the business makes them fragile and vulnerable, he noted.

“More often than not, these RRBs even face competition from their own sponsor banks too. In this background, there have been many efforts to restructure the RRBs to make them strong and vibrant but the results have not been that encouraging because of the intrinsic reasons and they are bound to be so,” Venkatachalam said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

AIBEA opposes govt decision to privatise IDBI Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) has opposed the government’s move to privatise IDBI Bank, terming the decision as a “retrograde” move. The association said the government should control a minimum of 51 per cent share capital of the bank.

The bank came into trouble as some private corporate houses cheated IDBI Bank by not repaying the loans taken, while the need of the hour is to take action against the defaulters and recover the money, the bank union said in a statement.

The Cabinet on Wednesday gave in-principle approval for strategic disinvestment along with transfer of management control in IDBI Bank in line with the Budget announcement earlier this year.

The central government and LIC together own more than 94 per cent equity of IDBI Bank.

“The need is to take action on the defaulters and recover the money. Unfortunately, now the decision has been taken to sell the bank to a private company. IDBI Bank is a national asset and should not be sold away in this fashion. It is a retrograde move,” AIBEA said.

If sold to a private company, the existing reservation in jobs for SC/ST category will be withdrawn, it said, adding this is social injustice to the unemployed youth of this country.

The only major problem of the bank is its huge bad loans of Rs 36,000 crore as of March 31, 2021 (22 per cent). Out of the operating profit of Rs 1,900 crore for the year ended March 2021, Rs 1,500 crore have been set off for provision for bad loans, AIBEA Secretary General C H Venkatachalam said.

“Now to camouflage these ills of the bank, the bank is being sold away. We express our strong protest against this decision and urge upon the government not to proceed with the sale of IDBI Bank,” he said.

AIBEA said bank’s deposits of Rs 2.3 lakh crore is people’s money and it should be used for their welfare and national development, not for the private corporate loot.

IDBI was started as a Development Financial Institution (DFI) in the 1960s. It was later converted as IDBI Bank much against the statute approved by Parliament earlier, it added.

It said the bank played a leading role in financing industrial development in the country.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank unions threaten with aggressive protest against privatisation move, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank unions across India have not yet given up and in order to support their stance against the proposed privatisation of some state-run banks, they have made threats of holding more strikes against the Union government. This comes after the general council meeting of the All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA) on Sunday.

“The general council meeting has called upon all our unions and members all over the country to continue the struggle against bank privatisation, get ready for prolonged strikes and intensify our campaign to defend public sector banking and defeat attempts of privatization,” the union said in a statement.

FM Niramala Sitharaman announced in the Union Budget speech on February 1 that the government will conduct privatisation of two more public sector banks besides IDBI Bank, in the financial year 2022. Following this major development, on March 15 and 16, about 10 million bank employees participating from nearly 9 bank unions conducted a two-day bank strike

Bank unions have also begun engaging with customers and the public at large, on what they believe are the ill-effects of privatization.

In a statement AIBEA added, “Public sector banks provide permanent jobs for the educated youth. But we know the plight of the employees working in the new private banks where job security is totally absent. Fair wages are denied. Trade union rights are non-existent. Thus, privatisation of banks will enslave the young employees into these adverse conditions.”

The 2-day national bank strike led to Heavy losses of about Rs 16,500 crore due to clearance of cheques and payment instruments only on the first day of the strike. Payment instruments such as cheques, demand drafts and pay orders are processed by three large centres.

While Chennai handles 5.8 million instruments worth ₹5,150 crore every day, Mumbai handles 8.6 million instruments worth ₹6,500 crore and Delhi processes 5.7 million instruments worth ₹4,850 crore.

Also Read: Privatisation…Long (not) live Public Sector Banks



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Govt should strengthen PSBs instead of privatisation: AIBEA

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Government should strengthen public sector banks (PSBs) by helping them recover bad loans instead of privatising them, according to the All India Bank Employees’ Association (AIBEA).

“The only problem PSBs facing is bad loans. Most of the bad loans are due to the corporates and rich industrialists,” said CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBEA, in a statement. He underscored that the Government should support PSBs, take action against the defaulting corporates and industrialists, and not privatise the banks.

“Many private sector banks have collapsed in our country. Last year YES Bank was in trouble, and through eight financial intermediaries, including State Bank of India, that bank was rescued. Recently, Lakshmi Vilas Bank, another private sector bank, got into trouble, and it was given to a foreign bank. Hence, one cannot accept that private sector banks are very efficient,” said Venkatachalam.

The Association General Secretary observed that only public sector banks give loans to common people, poor people, agriculture, small-scale sectors, etc. Private banks help only the big corporates, he alleged. “Public sector banks give permanent jobs to young unemployed. In private banks, it is only contract jobs.”

“Private banks will not open branches in rural areas. Only public sector banks have opened thousands of branches in the villages,” he said. He feared that if PSBs are privatised, rural branches will be closed in the name of cost-saving.

With 75 per cent of total branches in the country, public sector banks have opened 40.50 crore Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) accounts, but private sector banks, with 25 per cent of the total branches, have opened only 1.25 crore PMJDY accounts.

Also read: Govt could raise up to ₹12,800 cr if it divests in 2 PSBs: CARE Ratings

“Total deposits in the banking sector today is 146 lakh crore. This is hard-earned public savings. We cannot allow private hands to play with this huge public savings. Hence privatisation is a bad idea. If the Government is serious about economic development, public sector banks should be strengthened,” he added.

The United Forum of Bank Unions, the umbrella body of nine trade unions in the banking sector, has called for a strike on March 15 and 16 to protest against the Government’s decision to privatise two PSBs.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY