Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2020-21/77
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 08

December 04, 2020

To,

All Category – I Authorised Dealer Banks

Madam / Sir,

External Trade – Facilitation – Export of Goods and Services

Please refer to the Statement on Development and Regulatory Polices announced as part of Bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement dated December 4, 2020. With a view to further enhance the ease of doing business and quicken the approval process, it has been decided to delegate more powers to the Authorised Dealer Category – I banks (AD banks) in the following areas:

1. Direct Dispatch of Shipping Documents

1.1 In terms of Paragraph 2 of A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 6 dated August 13, 2008, AD banks have been allowed to regularise cases of dispatch of shipping documents by the exporter direct to the consignee or his agent resident in the country of the final destination of goods, up to USD 1 million or its equivalent per export shipment.

1.2 With a view to simplify the procedure, it has been decided to do away with the limit of USD 1 million per export shipment.

1.3 Accordingly, AD banks may regularize such direct dispatch of shipping documents irrespective of the value of export shipment, subject to following conditions:

  1. The export proceeds have been realized in full except for the amount written off, if any, in accordance with the extant provisions for write off.

  2. The exporter is a regular customer of AD bank for a period of at least six months.

  3. The exporter’s account with the AD bank is fully compliant with Reserve Bank’s extant KYC / AML guidelines.

  4. The AD bank is satisfied about the bonafides of the transaction.

2. “Write-off” of unrealized Export bills

2.1 Attention is invited to A.P. (DIR. Series) Circular No. 88 dated March 12, 2013 on “write-off” of unrealized export bills. To provide greater flexibility to the AD banks and to reduce the time taken for according such approvals, the extant procedure is revised as under:

Particulars Limit Limit (%) In relation to
Self-write-off by an exporter
(Other than the Status Holder Exporter)
5% Total export proceeds realized during the calendar year preceding the year in which the write-off is being done
Self-write-off by Status Holder Exporter 10%
Write-off by AD Category-1 Bank 10%

2.2 The above limits of self-write-off and write-off by the AD bank shall be reckoned cumulatively and shall be available subject to the following conditions:

a) The relevant amount has remained outstanding for more than one year;

b) Satisfactory documentary evidence is furnished indicating that the exporter had made all efforts to realise the export proceeds;

c) The exporter is a regular customer of the bank for a period of at least 6 months, is fully compliant with KYC/AML guidelines and AD Bank is satisfied with the bonafides of the transaction.

d) The case falls under any of the undernoted categories:

  1. The overseas buyer has been declared insolvent and a certificate from the official liquidator, indicating that there is no possibility of recovery of export proceeds, has been produced.

  2. The unrealized amount represents the balance due in a case settled through the intervention of the Indian Embassy, Foreign Chamber of Commerce or similar Organization;

  3. The goods exported have been auctioned or destroyed by the Port / Customs / Health authorities in the importing country;

  4. The overseas buyer is not traceable over a reasonably long period of time.

  5. The unrealized amount represents the undrawn balance of an export bill (not exceeding 10% of the invoice value) remaining outstanding that turned out to be unrealizable despite all efforts made by the exporter;

  6. The cost of resorting to legal action would be disproportionate to the unrealized amount of the export bill or where the exporter even after winning the Court case against the overseas buyer could not execute the Court decree due to reasons beyond his control;

  7. Bills were drawn for the difference between the letter of credit value and actual export value or between the provisional and the actual freight charges but the amounts have remained unrealized consequent to dishonor of the bills by the overseas buyer with no prospects of realization.

2.3 Notwithstanding anything contained in para 2.1 and 2.2 above, the AD bank may, on request of the exporter, write-off unrealised export bills without any limit in respect of cases falling under any of the categories specified at 2.2 (d) (i), (ii) and (iii) above provided AD bank is satisfied with the documentary evidence produced.

2.4 AD banks may also permit write-off of outstanding amount of export bills up to the specified ceilings indicated in para 2.1 above, where the documents have been directly dispatched by the exporter to the consignee or his agent resident in the country of final destination of goods if the case falls under any of the categories specified at 2.2 (d) (i), (ii) and (iii) above.

2.5 The AD bank shall ensure that the exporter seeking write-off has submitted documentary evidence towards surrendering of proportionate export incentives, if any, availed of in respect of the relative export bill.

2.6 In case of self-write off, the AD bank shall obtain from the exporter, a certificate from Chartered Accountant indicating the export realization in the preceding calendar year and details of the amount of write-off, if any, already availed of during the current calendar year along with the requisite details of the EDF/Export Bill under the write-off request. The certificate shall also indicate that the export incentives, if any, availed by the exporter have been surrendered.

2.7 The following cases, however, would not qualify for the “write-off” facility:

  1. Exports made to countries with externalization problem i.e. where the overseas buyer has deposited the value of export in local currency but the amount has not been allowed to be repatriated by the Central Bank authorities of the country concerned.

  2. EDF/Softex which are under investigation by agencies like, Enforcement Directorate, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Bureau of Investigation, etc. as also the outstanding bills which are subject matter of civil / criminal suit.

2.8 AD banks shall report write-off of export bills in Export Data Processing and Monitoring System (EDPMS).

2.9 AD banks shall put in place a system to carry out random check / percentage check of the export bills so written-off by their internal Inspectors/Auditors (including external Auditors).

2.10 Requests of write-off not covered under the above instructions may be referred to the Regional Office concerned of the Reserve Bank.

3. Set-off of Export receivables against Import payables

3.1 Presently, AD banks are allowing exporters/importers to set-off their outstanding export receivables against outstanding import payables from/to the same overseas buyer/supplier. The Bank has been receiving requests from AD banks, on behalf of their Importer/Exporter constituents, for allowing such set-off with their overseas group/associate companies either on net basis or gross basis, through an in-house or outsourced centralised settlement arrangement.

3.2 Accordingly, it has been decided to delegate powers to AD banks to also consider such requests of set-off, and the revised guidelines, in supersession of the instructions contained in circular A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No 47 dated November 17, 2011, are issued as under:

The AD bank may allow set-off of outstanding export receivables against outstanding import payables, subject to the following conditions:

  1. The arrangement shall be operationalized/supervised through/by one AD bank only

  2. AD bank is satisfied with the bonafides of the transactions and ensures that there are no KYC/AML/CFT concerns;

  3. The invoices under the transaction are not under investigation by Directorate of Enforcement/Central Bureau of Investigation or any other investigative agency;

  4. Import/export of goods/services has been undertaken as per the extant Foreign Trade policy

  5. The export / import transactions with ACU countries are kept outside the arrangement;

  6. Set-off of export receivables against goods shall not be allowed against import payables for services and vice versa.

  7. AD bank shall ensure that import payables/export receivables are outstanding at the time of allowing set-off. Further, set-off shall be allowed between the export and import legs taking place during the same calendar year.

  8. In case of bilateral settlement, the set-off shall be in respect of same overseas buyer/supplier subject to it being supported by verifiable agreement/mutual consent.

  9. In case of settlement within the group/associates companies, the arrangement shall be backed by a written, legally enforceable agreement/contract. AD bank shall ensure that the terms of agreement are strictly adhered to;

  10. Set-off shall not result in tax evasion/avoidance by any of the entities involved in such arrangement.

  11. Third party guidelines shall be adhered to by the concerned entities, wherever applicable;

  12. AD bank shall ensure compliance with all the regulatory requirement relating to the transactions;

  13. AD bank may seek Auditors/CA certificate wherever felt necessary.

  14. Each of the export and import transaction shall be reported separately (gross basis) in FETERS/EDPMS/IDPMS, as applicable

  15. AD bank to settle the transaction in E/IDPMS by utilizing the ‘set-off indicator’ and mentioning the details of shipping bills/bill of entry/invoice details being settled in the remark column (including details of entities involved)

4. Refund of Export Proceeds

4.1 Attention is invited to A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No.37 dated April 05, 2007, in terms of which AD banks, through whom the export proceeds were originally realised, were allowed to consider requests for refund of export proceeds of goods exported from India and being re-imported into India on account of poor quality.

4.2 There have been instances when re-importing of goods has not been possible as the exported goods had reportedly been auctioned or destroyed in the importing country.

4.3 The instructions have been reviewed and henceforth AD banks, while permitting refund of export proceeds of goods exported from India, shall:

  1. Exercise due diligence on the track record of the exporter;

  2. Verify the bona-fides of the transaction/s;

  3. Obtain from the exporter a certificate issued by DGFT / Custom authorities that no export incentive has been availed of by the exporter against the relevant export or the proportionate export incentives availed, if any, have been surrendered;

  4. Not insist on the requirement of re-import of goods, where exported goods have been auctioned or destroyed by the Port / Customs / Health authorities/ any other accredited agency in the importing country subject to submission of satisfactory documentary evidence.

4.4 In all other cases AD banks shall ensure that procedures as applicable to normal imports are adhered to and that an undertaking from the exporter, to re-import the goods within three months from the date of refund of export proceeds, shall be obtained.

5. AD banks may bring the contents of this Circular to the notice of their constituents concerned. The Master Direction No 16/2015 dated January 01, 2016 is being updated to reflect the above changes.

6. The directions contained in this Circular have been issued under Section 10(4) and 11(1) of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.

Yours faithfully,

(Ajay Kumar Misra)
Chief General Manager in Charge

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2020-21/76
DOR.RRB.No.28/31.01.001/2020-21

December 4, 2020

All Regional Rural Banks

Madam/ Sir,

Introduction of Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) and Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) for Regional Rural Banks (RRBs)

In order to provide an additional avenue for liquidity management to Regional Rural Banks (RRBs), it has been decided that Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) and Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) will be extended to Scheduled RRBs meeting the following criteria:

  1. Implemented Core Banking Solution (CBS)

  2. There is a minimum CRAR of nine per cent and

  3. Fully compliant with the terms and conditions for availing LAF and MSF issued by Financial Markets Operations Department (FMOD), Reserve Bank of India.

2. The names of RRBs which meet the eligibility norms to participate in LAF and MSF (Positive List) and of those RRBs found ineligible (Negative List) will be intimated to the banks concerned. The eligibility status of the banks will be reviewed on an ongoing basis.

3. The effective date from which the RRBs will be eligible to avail of LAF and MSF will be intimated separately.

Yours faithfully,

(Thomas Mathew)
Chief General Manager

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Declaration of dividends by banks

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2020-21/75
DOR.BP.BC.No.29/21.02.067/2020-21

December 4, 2020

All Commercial Banks and All Cooperative Banks,

Madam / Dear Sir,

Declaration of dividends by banks

Please refer to our circular DOR.BP.BC.No.64/21.02.067/2019-20 dated April 17, 2020, on the captioned subject.

2. In view of the ongoing stress and heightened uncertainty on account of COVID-19, it is imperative that banks continue to conserve capital to support the economy and absorb losses. In order to further strengthen the banks’ balance sheets, while at the same time support lending to the real economy, it has been decided that banks shall not make any dividend payment on equity shares from the profits pertaining to the financial year ended March 31, 2020.

Yours faithfully,

(Usha Janakiraman)
Chief General Manager

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2020-21/74
DPSS.CO.PD No.754/02.14.003/2020-21

December 04, 2020

The Chairman / Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer
All Scheduled Commercial Banks, including Regional Rural Banks /
Urban Co-operative Banks / State Co-operative Banks /
District Central Co-operative Banks / Payments Banks /
Small Finance Banks / Local Area Banks /
Non-bank Prepaid Payment Instrument issuers / Authorised Card Payment Networks /
National Payments Corporation of India

Madam / Dear Sir,

Processing of e-mandates for recurring transactions

Please refer to our circular DPSS.CO.PD.No.447/02.14.003/2019-20 dated August 21, 2019 vide which relaxation in Additional Factor of Authentication (AFA) was permitted while processing e-mandates / standing instructions on cards and Prepaid Payment Instruments (PPIs) for recurring transactions with values up to ₹ 2,000/-, subject to conditions listed therein. These instructions were later extended to Unified Payments Interface (UPI) as well.

2. Based on requests received from stakeholders and given the sufficient protection available to customers, it was announced in the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated December 4, 2020 that the aforesaid transaction limit will be increased. Accordingly, it has been decided to increase the above limit for AFA relaxation to ₹ 5,000/- per transaction, with effect from January 1, 2021.

3. Processing of recurring transactions (domestic or cross-border) using cards / PPIs / UPI under arrangements / practices not compliant with the aforesaid instructions shall not be continued beyond March 31, 2021.

4. This directive is issued under Section 10 (2) read with Section 18 of Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (Act 51 of 2007).

Yours faithfully,

(P. Vasudevan)
Chief General Manager

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Notifications

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


RBI/2020-21/73
DPSS.CO.OD.No.753/06.08.005/2020-21

December 4, 2020

The Chairman / Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer
Non-bank Payment System Operators

Madam / Dear Sir

Authorisation of entities for operating a Payment System under the Payment and
Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (PSS Act) – Introduction of Cooling Period

Please refer to provisions contained in Section 4 of PSS Act and ‘Oversight Framework for Financial Market Infrastructures and Retail Payment Systems issued on June 13, 2020’, in terms of which any person before commencing or operating a payment system shall obtain authorisation from the Reserve Bank and for the purpose shall apply in a prescribed format to RBI as defined in Payment and Settlement Systems Regulations, 2008.

2. To inculcate discipline and encourage submission of applications by serious players as also for effective utilisation of regulatory resources, it has been decided to introduce the concept of Cooling Period in the following situations –

  1. Authorised Payment System Operators (PSOs) whose Certificate of Authorisation (CoA) is revoked or not-renewed for any reason; or

  2. CoA is voluntarily surrendered for any reason; or

  3. Application for authorisation of a payment system has been rejected by RBI.

  4. New entities that are set-up by promoters involved in any of the above categories; definition of promoters for the purpose, shall be as defined in the Companies Act, 2013.

3. The Cooling Period shall be for one year from the date of revocation / non-renewal / acceptance of voluntary surrender / rejection of application, as the case may be. In respect of entities whose application for authorisation is returned for any reason by RBI, condition of Cooling Period shall be invoked after giving the entity an additional opportunity to submit the application.

4. During the Cooling Period, entities shall be prohibited from submission of applications for operating any payment system under the PSS Act.

5. This directive is issued under Section 10(2) read with Section 18 of Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (Act 51 of 2007).

Yours faithfully,

(P Vasudevan)
Chief General Manager

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 19 20 21