UBS expects record IPO year for India despite Covid-19 crisis, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Baiju Kalesh

India’s sharp surge in Covid-19 cases will not prevent the country’s markets from setting a record for initial public offerings in 2021, as a cohort of technology companies make their much-anticipated debuts later in the year, according to UBS Group AG.

Last year companies amassed $4.6 billion from IPOs, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, and Anuj Kapoor, head of investment banking at UBS India, believes the figure will be easily eclipsed.

“I would say we will surpass twice the money we raised in 2020 through IPOs,” Kapoor said.

Before the arrival of the coronavirus pandemic’s second wave, India’s markets were full of optimism. So far in 2021, IPOs in India have raised nearly $3 billion, the best start to the year since 2018, the data show. The activity was aided by ample liquidity, with foreign investors as well as retail stock-pickers looking for new ideas to invest in, Kapoor said.

The latest outbreak of Covid-19 cases has had a serious impact on the equities market, and there has been a decoupling of Indian versus global markets since March, Kapoor said. The benchmark Sensex index has risen 2.2% this year, compared to the 9.3% gain year to date in the MSCI World index.

Overseas investors sold $1.4 billion worth of Indian stocks in the month to April 29, the biggest monthly outflow since March last year when the nation imposed one of the strictest lockdowns in the world to curb the spread of the pandemic.

“We will see a few more tough weeks ahead before Covid-19 plateaus and starts declining,” said Kapoor, who is also on the board of UBS India. “Hopefully, this should not linger beyond June.”

Kapoor expects tech companies to start hitting the market in the second half of the year. He predicts fewer than five will list this year, however that figure could more than double in 2022.

Online food delivery startup Zomato Ltd. recently filed its initial prospectus with the regulator for an IPO that could raise as much as 82.5 billion rupees ($1.1 billion). Other tech-based businesses waiting in the wings include cosmetics retailer Nykaa E-Retail Pvt and insurance aggregator Policybazaar, Bloomberg News has reported.

On the mergers and acquisitions front, Kapoor sees more deal activity from local companies and foreign players buying Indian firms than in domestic firms targeting assets overseas.

Global private equity funds have a strong interest in the health-care and pharmaceutical sectors, he said. Last year saw KKR & Co. buy a majority stake in J.B. Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in a $371.3 million deal that completed in November. A month earlier, Carlyle Group Inc. closed a transaction to acquire a 20% interest in Piramal Pharma Ltd. for $466 million.

Locally, some of the largest investors in tech companies will push the firms toward consolidation.

“We are going to see this theme play out as business models mature,” he said. He also sees combinations occurring in areas such as financial services.

Kapoor’s bullishness stems from his unit’s performance in 2020, UBS’s best year ever in India by revenue, driven primarily by equities activity, he said. The firm added new junior banker roles in March, and will recruit talent judiciously, he said.

“This year we will have a healthy mix of capital markets and M&A,” he said. “2021 should be better for deal activity than 2020.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Warren Buffett sees a ‘red hot’ economy with creeping inflation, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Katherine Chiglinsky

Warren Buffett delivered a clear verdict Saturday on the state of the U.S. economy as it emerges from the pandemic: red hot.

“It’s almost a buying frenzy,” the Berkshire Hathaway Inc. chief executive officer said during the conglomerate’s annual meeting, which was held virtually from Los Angeles. “People have money in their pocket and they’re paying higher prices,” he said.

Buffett attributed the faster-than-expected recovery to swift and decisive rescue measures by the Federal Reserve and U.S. government, which helped kick 85% of the economy into “super high gear,” he said. But as growth roars back and interest rates remain low, many — including Berkshire — are raising prices and there is more inflation “than people would have anticipated six months ago,” he said.

Buffett reunited with his long-time friend and business partner Charlie Munger for this year’s meeting. Munger didn’t make it to last year’s meeting in Omaha, Nebraska — Buffett’s hometown — due to the shutdowns across the country. Some shareholders were relieved to see the duo fielding questions together again.

“I really feel that both Charlie and Warren displayed their usual and amazing level of acuity and intellectual energy,” said James Armstrong, who manages assets including Berkshire shares as president of Henry H. Armstrong Associates.

Buffett and Munger spent hours fielding questions, from the economy, to climate and diversity, the SPAC boom, taxes and succession. Here’s the lowdown:

Climate Pressure:
Berkshire faced pressure from two shareholders proposals, one to improve transparency related to its efforts on climate change. The topic was bound to be a feature at the meeting — and it was.

When asked about the proposals, Buffett stuck to his previous stance. Measures to produce big reports on diversity and climate for his business lines spanning energy to railroads were, he said, “asinine.” The proposals were later voted down.

Buffett was also asked about Berkshire’s stake in oil and gas producer Chevron Corp., which it disclosed earlier this year. Buffett said he felt “no compunction” in the least about its ownership in the company, which he said had benefited society in many ways. While he acknowledged the world is shifting away from hydrocarbons, people on the extreme sides of either argument are “a little nuts,” he said.

Greg Abel, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, called climate change a “material risk.” He added that they’re setting targets and spending $18 billion over 10 years on transmission infrastructure.

Killer SPACs:
Buffett warned investors that Berkshire might not have much luck striking deals amid the boom in special purpose acquisition companies that gripped the market over the past year.

“It’s a killer,” Buffett said about the influence of SPAC companies on Berkshire’s ability to find businesses to buy. “That won’t go on forever, but it’s where the money is now, and Wall Street goes where the money is.”

Buffett, 90, also spent part of Berkshire’s annual meeting Saturday addressing the recent boom in retail and day trading. A lot of people have entered the stock market “casino” over the past year, he said.

Tax:
Buffett said President Joe Biden’s proposals for a corporate tax hike would hurt Berkshire shareholders. He added that antitrust laws and tax policy could change things for the company but new tax laws wouldn’t alter its no-dividend policy.

Succession:

Buffett and Munger, 97, fielded the majority of questions at Saturday’s meeting, but their two top deputies Abel and Ajit Jain, who runs the insurers, also shared the stage. Investors were able to get a closer look at the pair who are considered the top candidates for the job.

Munger dropped a little mention of the post-Buffett years that drew speculation on social media about the most likely candidate to succeed Buffett. The CEO was pointing out that decentralization doesn’t work everywhere because it requires a certain type of culture that businesses need to have.

“Yeah, but we do,” Munger insisted. “And Greg will keep the culture.”

Abel has long been considered the top candidate to replace Buffett, especially when he was promoted to a vice chairman role overseeing all non-insurance operations, which gives him a wide array of responsibilities, including oversight of the railroad BNSF and the energy business.

Errors:
Buffett offered a few mea culpas during Saturday’s meeting. He noted that selling some Apple Inc. stock last year was a mistake and even said that Haven, the health care venture with JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Amazon.com Inc., thought it could fight the “tape worm” of American health care costs but the worm won.

“That was probably a mistake,” Buffett said of those Apple stock sales last year. Berkshire still owned a roughly $110 billion stake in the iPhone maker at the end of March. “In fact, Charlie, in his usual low-key way, let me know that you thought it was a mistake too,” he said to Munger, who shared the stage with him.

Cash Pile:
Before the annual meeting started, the company released its first-quarter earnings, giving investors a dive into the 19.5% operating profit gain during the period.

Berkshire ended the quarter with a near-record $145.4 billion of cash on hand as it continued to generate funds faster than Buffett could deploy them. But Buffett also ended pulling back on some capital deployment levers during the period. He bought back just $6.6 billion of Berkshire’s own stock, short of the record $9 billion set in prior quarters, and ended up with the second-highest level of net stock sales in the first quarter in almost five years.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Tax Query: How to close HUF account with the I-T Department

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


My friend is having an HUF account. Till 2016 he had business income in HUF. He has two sons and a spouse. Both sons are not interested in continuing the business, hence he wants to close his HUF account with the bank as well as the income tax department. Request your advice on how to close HUF account with the income tax department.

Pravin Shah

Hindu Undivided Family (‘HUF’) is dissolved only on the partition of property between the members. It is important to note that as per the provisions of section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), partial partition of HUF is not recognised. Under the provisions of Act, partition means ‘full partition’.

For the purpose of dissolution of the HUF, your friend will need to draw up a deed of full partition and get the same registered. Once the partition of HUF is complete, it will cease to exist.

Till the date of such dissolution, the HUF shall be assessed in its capacity as a HUF and the return of income for such period should be filed by your friend. Also, your friend may make an application for surrender of PAN of HUF with the jurisdictional assessing officer by submitting a request in this regard after the partition of the HUF and related compliances (like filing of return) are complete.

In one of answers to a query earlier, you had stated that in view of the amendment to Sec. 55 of the Income tax Act, where the property is purchased before April 1, 2001, the fair market valuation as per the valuation by a registered valuer as at April 1, 2001 would be considered the cost of acquisition, which has been capped from April 1, 2021 at the stamp duty value, wherever available. A search on the site of the Inspector General of Valuation of Registration, Tamil Nadu reveals that fair valuation as revised from 9.6.2017 is available only from April 1, 2002. The site states that the information provided online is updated and no physical visit is required for services provided online. Do we then assume that since the stamp duty value is not available as on April 1, 2021, the fair market valuation by the valuer could be considered as the cost of acquisition for property sale in Chennai ?

Murli Krishnamurthy

As per the provisions of section 55(2)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), in case of a property purchased before April 1, 2001, the cost of acquisition shall be considered as any of the following at the option of the assessee:

– the fair market value (‘FMV’) of the property as on April 1, 2001; or

– the actual cost of acquisition of the property.

As per amendment made vide Finance Act, 2020, in case of a capital asset being land or building or both, the FMV of such asset (as on April 1, 2001) for the purpose of section 55, shall not exceed the stamp duty value (‘SDV’), wherever available, as on April 1, 2001.

In the instant case, I understand that SDV as on April 1, 2001 is not available for the subject property. In such scenario, you may consider FMV as on April 1, 2001 as the cost of acquisition of the property for the purpose of section 55 of the Act.

The writer is a practising chartered accountant

Send your queries to taxtalk@thehindu.co.in

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How to retire early without spoiling family’s dreams

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Raghavan, aged 49, and Saraswathi, aged 42, wanted to draft their retirement readiness plan. Raghavan, after a busy corporate life, felt it was time to quit and spend time with family. His daughter Anu (18) had just joined college and son Venkat (16) was in ninth standard.

The accompanying table (Assets) shows his net worth.

His investment assets are ₹5.53 crore. Also, he holds 75 sovereigns of physical gold. Raghavan has been a balanced risk taker over the years. He understands the volatility of equity investments and stayed put over the years to generate reasonable returns from his investment portfolio. He has now exited all his direct equity investments and stuck to mutual funds over the years. He has a sound investment portfolio built over the years, with regular investing.

Family history suggested that the life expectancy number for him and his wife would be 100 years. His family has maintained a modest lifestyle with monthly expense of ₹45,000 per month excluding children’s education expenses.

Goals

Firstly, he needs to maintain one-year expenses as emergency fund in fixed deposits.

Secondly, Anu needs ₹6 lakh towards her college education for the next two years, which is to be maintained as fixed deposits/liquid funds. Also, Anu’s PG needs funding.

Anu’s marriage expenses are estimated to be ₹35 lakh. Anu’s gold gift needs will be met from Raghvan’s current holding of physical gold.

Similar planning for Venkat is also required.

The family needs ₹2.7 crore to manage expenses of ₹50,000 per month for a period of 58 years, till Saraswathi attains 100 years of age.Expected return assumed to be at 8 per cent CAGR.

We suggested they add ₹5,000 per month towards any medical need as additional retirement fund. This may be needed to support any prescription costs, medical helper costs over the years.

It was also suggested that Raghavan keep some corpus towards his property maintenance. His independent house may need reconstruction/renovation as the years pass by.

All his goals are seen in the accompanying table.

Final thoughts

Raghavan is very well positioned to opt for immediate retirement with his modest lifestyle. With the current allocation of 49:51 in equity:debt, he can fund most of his goals without any compromise.

We arrived at a total cost of all his goals to be Rs 6.52 crore. His financial assets are worth Rs 5.53 crore. With long-term equity exposure to goals such as retirement health fund, post retirement vacation fund and property maintenance fund, this corpus is sufficient for him to retire immediately.

Mathematically, for a financial planner, saying ‘yes’ to retirement-ready status to a client is easier.

But there are other behavioural aspects to a peaceful and comfortable retirement. Having worked for more than 25 years with dedication, he was prudent and disciplined while saving for retirement. But he never really bothered to spend time with family or enjoy vacations which have become more important for him now.

This is likely to increase spending in the initial years of his retired life. So, it was advised to look out for regular earning opportunity.

This is basically to protect oneself against unexpected change in financial assumptions such as interest rate, inflation and other surprises such as health needs and lifestyle expenses.

When it comes to retirement readiness, it is always better to exceed the planned corpus by substituting with regular income or allocating additional corpus called ‘retirement fall back fund’.

Hence it was advised that Raghvan take logically sound decisions on spending in the first five years post retirement.

The writer, Co-founder of Chamomile Investment Consultants in Chennai, is an investment advisor registered with SEBI

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Max LifeSmart Secure Plus: Should you go for this multiple-frills policy?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Max Life Insurance recently launched Smart Secure Plus Plan, a non-linked, non-participating, term life policy. While the loss of a family member is hard to cope with, a term cover can offer financial support to the surviving members. Max Life’s new plan, in addition to providing a risk cover, comes with multiple frills and riders. Should you go for this plan?

Basics

The policy is available for those from 18 to 65 years of age, with minimum sum assured (SA) of ₹20 lakh (minimum SA for joint life is ₹10 lakh). It provides cover up to 85 years of age. The policy offers different premium payment term options — 5, 10, 12, 15 years, and one where you can pay premium till 60 years. Apart from this, regular pay option (where you can pay premium till the end of the policy term) and single premium payment option, too, are available.

Unlike most policies in the market where the policyholder chooses the pay-out (death benefit) for the nominee, Smart Secure Plus allows the nominee to select from three pay-out options — lump sum payment or monthly pay-out or part lump sum and part monthly pay-out. In addition to the death benefit, the policy provides coverage against diagnosis of terminal illness (pay-out subject to maximum of ₹1 crore), post which the policy terminates.

Similar to most term plans, this policy too offers two SA options, to be chosen by the policyholder at the inception of the policy. These are level SA (where the life cover remains constant for the duration of the policy) and increasing SA, where the cover increases 5 per cent every policy year, subject to a maximum of 200 per cent of the base SA.

The policy also offers enhanced features for additional premium, such as joint life cover, return of premium, premium break option, voluntary top-up of SA, accelerated critical illness, accident cover, waiver of premium and critical illness and disability rider.

What’s new

While Smart Secure Plus Plan is, by and large, similar to other term plans with respect to coverage and riders, it has two new features — special exit value option and premium break option.

Under the special exit value feature, a policyholder may choose to exit the policy and receive the premiums paid. That is, you can receive the entire premium paid for the base policy if you are 65 years or you have reached the 25th year (applicable for policy term from 40 years to 44 years) or the 30th policy year (applicable for policy terms greater than 44 years), whichever is earlier.

Though special exit value is offered in-built in the policy (without payment of additional premium), there are certain points to keep in mind. It is not available if the policyholder has opted for return of premium rider. It is also not available if the policy term is less than 40 years. Lastly, when a policyholder opts for special exit value, then only the premium applicable on the base cover has to be paid and not the premium additionally paid on riders or optional covers.

The second feature is premium break, where the policyholder can take a break from premium payment and still stay covered. The policyholder will be allowed to take this break twice during the policy term. If the premium break option is not exercised, the insurer will waive the last two policy year premiums. But the option is available only for policies with a policy term greater than 30 years and premium payment term greater than 21 years. The feature is available only under the regular pay and premium payment term till 60 years options.

Do keep in mind that this feature is available only on the payment of additional premium. Further, the first break is available only after the completion of 10 policy years and the premium waived includes base cover premium, accelerated critical illness benefit premium and accident cover premium. The second premium break can be exercised after a minimum gap of 10 years from the first premium break.

Both features have to be opted for at the inception of the policy.

Our take

When it comes to life insurance, it is best to go for a basic term plan, which is the cheapest life cover available in the market today. You can consider adding accidental death benefit and critical illness riders to your base plan and go for the ones available at a suitable premium.

When other riders like return of premium and waiver of premium are added to the policy, including Smart Secure Plus, the premium becomes steep. So for a 30-year old for SA of ₹1 crore (40-year term), with return of premium, the premium works out to ₹18,658 per year (including tax). But, a pure term life cover for the same person will cost about ₹7,300-12,000 a year.

The premium break option may not be useful for many as the income of an individual is likely to increase as he/she ages. Further, if there is any financial strain, he/she might as well go the special exit or early exit option instead of selecting premium break (for extra cost).

While it is advisable to stay covered for maximum number of years, the policy’s special exit options come in handy, particularly if you are in need of money. But you may not be able to avail this exit if you miss the said timeline (25th or 30th year). However, if you still want to exit the policy earlier, the insurer provides an option for early exit as well, but you may not receive the entire premium paid.

To sum up, you could go for this policy for its pure vanilla cover and special exit option. But if you want to go for online term plans, there’s a wider basket of policies to choose from.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What is inflation-adjusted return – The Hindu BusinessLine

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A phone call between two friends leads to a talk about inflation-adjusted returns.

Akhila: What are you up to, Karthik?

Karthik: I was planning to buy a television set for ₹50,000. But I later changed my mind to save and invest that amount to buy a better version next year.

Akhila: I hope inflation doesn’t eat into your returns.

Karthik: What do you mean?

Akhila: A few economists expect inflation to rise going ahead. If that happens, your inflation-adjusted returns can be low or even negative.

Karthik: Can you explain that?

Akhila: If you invest that ₹50,000 at four per cent p.a. in a fixed-income instrument, your investment will be worth ₹52,000 by year-end. Say, the average inflation over the next one year is six per cent and the price of the TV set which you decided not to buy, becomes ₹53,000. Let alone buying a better version, your investment amount won’t be sufficient to buy even the current model.

Karthik: Ouch!

Akhila: Inflation-adjusted returns, also called real returns takes into account the inflation rate while calculating the return on an investment.

Karthik: How do I calculate real returns?

Akhila: You can simply subtract the rate of inflation from the return on your investment. In the above example, the real return on your investment would be -2 per cent. That is, 4 per cent return minus the inflation rate of 6 per cent.

Karthik: That’s pretty simple.

Akhila: The above formula gives an approximate rate of real return. To be precise, you can use the formula — ((1+return)/(1+inflation rate)) – 1.

Karthik: Are there any savings instruments in the market that offer returns linked to inflation?

Akhila: There used to be inflation-indexed bonds but they are no longer available.

Karthik: Equities would give higher returns, right?

Akhila: Equity is said to deliver inflation-beating returns in the long-run. But remember, for the sake of earning higher inflation-adjusted returns, you should not go for investments that do not fit your risk appetite.

Karthik: What are the alternatives in the fixed income space?

Akhila: You can consider floating-rate instruments, coupon rates on which are linked to interest rate movements in the economy, which are a play of inflation as well.

Karthik: I remember reading the Simply Put column in BL Portfolio a few weeks back that talked about floating rate instruments such as Floating Rate Savings Bonds 2020, the PPF and the Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDFC First Bank Cuts Interest Rates On Savings Account. Details Inside

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Vipul Das

|

For accounts with a balance of more than Rs 1 lakh but less than Rs 2 crore, IDFC First Bank has reduced the interest rate on savings accounts from 6% to 5%. The new rates will take effect from today i.e. May 1st 2021. The private lender previously offered a savings interest rate of 7%, which was reduced to 6% in February 2021. The bank has now reduced it even further, keeping it at 4% for accounts with a balance of Rs 2 crore to Rs 10 crore, 5% for balance up to Rs 2 crore, and 4.5 percent for balance of Rs 1-10 lakh. Savings account yields are higher at some mid-sized private banks and small finance banks. Fincare Small Finance Bank, for example, offers 5% interest on balance up to Rs 1 lakh. For balance up to Rs 1 lakh there are also some banks providing higher interest rates now such as RBL Bank – 4.75%, ESAF Small Finance Bank – 4%, Suryoday Small Finance Bank and Ujjivan Small Finance Bank with a similar interest rate of 4%. Whereas for the amount above Rs 1 lakh Equitas and Ujjivan Small Finance Bank is offering the best interest rate of 7%. And 6.25% is provided by Fincare and Suryoday Small Finance Bank. There are top public and private sector banks which are currently promising higher interest rates on savings accounts. For instance among the public sector banks Punjab National Bank is offering 3 to 3.5% interest rate, whereas among the private sector banks RBL Bank is offering the highest interest rate of 4.75 to 6.5%.

IDFC Bank Savings Account Interest Rates

Savings account interest will be determined on a progressive basis, as per the below listed rate slabs.

IDFC First Bank Cuts Interest Rates On Savings Account. Details Inside



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

What to make of new MF skin in the game rules

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Should one take financial advice seriously if the advisor won’t face any consequences from his wrong calls? Would fishermen catch turtles instead of fish if they also had to eat them? Nassim Nicholas Taleb raised these questions in 2018 book, Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Life. He argued that for success in any profession, the seller needs to share in the risks of the buyer. SEBI has taken Taleb’s ideas to heart. To ensure that top officials of mutual funds don’t take out-sized risks and unleash losses on investors, it has now directed that top employees of mutual funds need to eat their own cooking.

New rules

· Key employees of asset management companies should be paid a minimum 20 per cent of their annual CTC (cost to company) after provident fund contributions and taxes, in mutual fund units in schemes in which they have a role. ‘Key employee’ here means not just the fund managers but also the mutual fund CEO, CIO, COO and many others. .

· If an employee has a role in multiple schemes, he or she should be paid units in proportion to their assets.

· If an employee or fund manager is involved with only one scheme, 50 per cent of his payout will be through units in that scheme and 50 per cent in others that he chooses, of similar or higher risk profile.

· These units will be locked in for 3 years.

· This won’t apply to employees handling ETFs, index funds, overnight funds and close end schemes.

· The compensation paid to each key employee in units should be disclosed on the mutual fund’s website.

These new rules are unlikely to transform a mediocre fund manager into a great selector of stocks or bonds, or transform him into a better navigator of market ups and downs. Therefore, factors such as the ability to beat benchmarks, track record across market cycles and downside containment matter far more than skin in the game (SITG) while choosing a fund.

To ensure that a fund manager’s interests are truly aligned with yours, he has to have a significant portion of his portfolio invested in the scheme he manages.

SEBI’s new SITG rules do not guarantee this. For a fund manager who has been in the profession for several years, 20 per cent of a single year’s net income will work out to a small component of his or her net worth.

. If they have no investments in a particular scheme to start with, the incremental investment from this rule is unlikely to be large enough to constitute significant SITG. Therefore, pay attention to the value of investments.

Is it voluntary?

In signalling preferences, voluntary actions by MF insiders count more than actions that are forced by regulations. Even before SEBI’s new rules kicked in, some AMCs had voluntary opted for SITG. Parag Parikh AMC has its promoters as well as key employees holding a ₹220 crore across its three schemes. Motilal Oswal AMC’s promoters are among the largest investors in its equity schemes while fund managers at HDFC Mutual Fund and DSP Mutual Fund feature very significant holdings by their directors and fund managers in some of their equity schemes. ICICI Prudential AMC has for a while now, been paying bonuses of its senior employees in the form of fund units.

When using SITG as an indication of where to park your money, therefore, run a check on the total quantum of employee investments in a scheme before this SEBI rule came into effect. Given that SEBI has allowed fund managers to allocate 50 per cent of their payout to funds other than their own, look out for fund managers investing in schemes that they don’t manage, as this is a strong indicator of schemes that they think highly of.

As SITG is not compulsory in index funds, ETFs and close end funds, these contributions are likely to be wholly voluntary.Watch out for trends that show insiders selling their SITG positions (which they can do after 3 years).

Don’t mirror allocations

Don’t try to copy the asset allocation patterns of MF insiders based on SITG information. Most mutual fund honchos are quite well-paid and may have a far higher risk appetite than yours. Therefore, SITG bets on risky categories such as small-cap thematic or credit risk should not be a reason for you to go whole hog on such schemes.

Two, by requiring non fund managers to spread out their SITG investments across schemes in proportion to their assets, SEBI’s rules automatically ensure large SITG investments for big schemes.

If an AMC’s largest scheme is their liquid fund or their arbitrage fund, this doesn’t mean you should fancy it too. How much of your own portfolio should be allocated between equity and debt and risky and safe scheme categories, should to be a function of your personal risk appetite and financial goals, and not anyone else’s.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How market-linked debentures combine the qualities of equity and debt

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In bonds, the returns are known upfront. At the other extreme are equity investments, where returns are uncertain. Market-linked debentures (MLDs) combine the two. MLDs are bonds/debentures where the coupon or interest payout is not defined as in the usual bonds. The ‘payout’, which is your return from the instrument, is made contingent upon the movement in another market, referred to as the underlying. The underlying can be an index or a stock or any other asset such as the Nifty, Sensex, any basket of stocks, government security or gold, to name a few. The advantage is, you get the benefit of investing in another market by simply buying a debenture.

They provide principal protection (PP) i.e. irrespective of the movement in the underlying market, you will get principal back on maturity. So, your downside in a PP structure is capped because worst possible return is zero. The upside depends on the movement in the underlying and MLD terms.

Two options

A point to be noted is that under certain structures of the product, the linkage with the underlying market is real. In certain other products, the conditionality of linkage with the underlying market is designed with a low probability, so that you have a high degree of certainty on returns. The latter are referred to as fixed-income-oriented structures and are more popular. Here, while there is a linkage with an underlying, the conditionality is kept in such a manner that the probability of getting the indicated return (XIRR) is near-certain. In real market-oriented structures, the pay-off is contingent upon the movement of the underlying.

More than 80 per cent of the issuances in the market are fixed income-oriented. As an illustration, a fixed income-oriented MLD can have a condition that if the Nifty as the underlying does not fall 75 per cent from the initial level or the price of 10-year government bond does not fall by 75 per cent, then the investor will get the indicated return. This condition being highly unlikely, the investor can visualise the return. In a real market-oriented structure, the terms would state something like this — if the Nifty goes up by X per cent, the investor would get 75 per cent of the upside.

Tax efficiency

MLDs are tax-efficient. There is no coupon payment, as they are by definition dependent on the underlying market movement. Principal protected structures are listed on exchanges and hence over a holding period of more than 1 year, become eligible for long term capital gains taxation (10 per cent plus surcharge and cess.

Compared to regular bonds, there is significant tax efficiency. Bond coupons and the usual zero-coupon bonds are taxed at the marginal slab rate i.e. 30 per cent plus surcharge and cess. The tenure of MLDs has to be a minimum of one year from a tax-efficiency perspective, which is the LTCG horizon required for listed bonds. Usually the tenure ranges from 15 months to a tad over three years. These are an HNI product and are not meant for retail investors. While there is no legally defined minimum ticket size (like ₹50 lakh in PMS), wealth management outfits would like to sell in ticket sizes of, say, ₹1 crore. But, the ticket size may vary. It depends on the face value also. If the face value is ₹10 lakh, it goes in multiples of 10 lakh.

The risk factors in MLDs are two-fold: (a) default risk, which can be gauged from the credit rating and (b) liquidity, there is no liquidity in the secondary market. Hence, if you need to redeem prior to maturity, there may not be a buyer. Nowadays, there are many issuers hitting the market. The presence of a PSU issuer rated AAA in this space, such as the Rural Electrification Corporation, implies that the concept of MLDs has the implicit support of the Government.

Some of the new private sector issuers hitting this segment are Shriram Transport Finance, Muthoot Fincorp, Shriram City Union, Hinduja Leyland Finance, Manappuram Finance and M&M Financial Services. This product is largely meant for HNIs and is yet to be made available in retail lot sizes. The issuances take place through private placements (as against public issues). Investors can avail of this product from wealth managers and a few select bond houses.

The author is a corporate trainer and author

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Income Tax Deadline For Belated Return, DRP, And Others Extended: Check Latest Dates Here

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Taxes

oi-Sneha Kulkarni

|

The Centre has extended some income tax deadlines on Saturday as a result of the extreme Covid-19 pandemic.

Due to the ongoing difficulties faced by taxpayers in meeting statutory compliances as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the government extended the deadlines for various compliances.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has given the following relaxation in respect of taxpayer compliances in light of numerous representations obtained to alleviate the difficulties faced by various stakeholders:

Latest Income Tax Due Dates Amid Covid Surge: Check Latest Dates

  • Appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) under Chapter XX of the Act, with a filing deadline of 1st April 2021 or later, maybe filed within the period allowed under that Section or by 31st May 2021, whichever is later.
  • Objections to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) under Section 144C of the Act, with a deadline of 1st April 2021 or later, may be filed within the period allowed under that Section or by 31st May 2021, whichever is later.
  • Income-tax returns in response to notices issued under Section 148 of the Act with a due date of 1st April 2021 or later may be filed within the period allowed by the notice or by 31st May 2021, whichever is later.
  • The filing of a belated return under Section 139 of the Act, as well as a revised return under Section 139 of the Act, for the Assessment Year 2020-21, which was due on or before March 31, 2021, can now be done on or before May 31, 2021.
  • Payment of tax deducted under Sections 194-IA, 194-IB, and 194M of the Act, as well as the filing of challan-cum-statement for such tax deducted, which are due by 30th April 2021(respectively) under Rule 30 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, maybe paid and furnished on or before 31st May 2021.
  • Form No. 61, which contains details of declarations received in Form No. 60 and is expected to be filed on or before April 30, 2021, maybe filed on or before May 31, 2021.
  • The deadline for TDS enforcement by persons making payments in real estate transactions has been extended from April 30 to the end of May. This holds true for both remitting deducted taxes to the IRS and filing the proper tax statement. In property transactions, there is a 1% TDS requirement.
Due Date Extended Due Date
Appeals to the Commissioner April 2021 31 May 2021
Dispute Resolution Panel 1st April 2021 31 May 2021
ITR Response 1st April 2021 31 May 2021
Belated Return 31 March 2021 31 May 2021
Payment of tax deducted 30 April 2021 31 May 2021
Form No. 60 30 April 2021 31 May 2021
TDS Compliance 30 April 2021 31 May 2021

According to the CBDT announcement, these relaxations are the latest in a series of government measures aimed at making enforcement easier for taxpayers and providing relief during these trying times. The CBDT said it had received many requests for extensions of time from taxpayers, contractors, and other stakeholders across the region.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 283 284 285 286 287 387