Growth agenda back on the table: Ravi Subramanian, MD and CEO of Shriram Housing

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The demand for housing is back after the second Covid wave and overall tailwinds are positive, believes Ravi Subramanian, Managing Director and CEO, Shriram Housing Finance. In an interview with BusinessLine, he said the company is looking at faster growth after the performance in June. Housing finance companies should be allowed to charge prepayment penalty in initial years, he further said. Edited excerpts:

How is the demand for housing post the second Covid wave?

Demand is back. In June, we did 80 per cent of our regular disbursals. Collections were back on track and we collected from almost 99 per cent of the customers we had originated in the last three years. It has improved further in July. The cheque bounce rates have reduced and in July were the lowest in the last 12 months. People are now reconciled to Covid, business is getting back on track. If we get another two months, business will be back roaring across the country.

Which are the segments where there is demand?

We are seeing a lot of demand in Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns. People are expanding their houses. Self-construction is giving us good volumes. Smaller and affordable housing projects are seeing a fair bit of traction. There is a lot of demand in the Rs 20 lakh to Rs 25 lakh segment, and the higher end of the spectrum, which is absolute ultra luxury. Our NPAs are well under control. NPAs had deteriorated by about 20 basis points in April, May and June. But given that our collections have picked up and bounce rates have come down, I expect September to be a far better quarter.

What kind of growth are you targeting?

Last year, the Covid impact stayed till the end of the first quarter. We started disbursing at the end of July and early August. Despite that, we grew our disbursals by about 90 per cent last year. This year, disbursals have started in June. If I get a clear runway from now on till the end of the year without a third wave, then disbursals could increase by at least 60 per cent to 70 per cent. Last year, we did about Rs 2,100 crore and this year we will do at least Rs 3,000 crore provided we get a clear runway from now till March. We will end up with assets under management of about Rs 5,500 crore to Rs 5,700 crore. June has brought the growth agenda back on the table.

How do you perceive competition from banks that offer low interest rates?

HFCs should be allowed to charge a prepayment penalty in case the customer moves in the first two-and-a-half to three years. The low interest rates are not much of an issue. There are many critera and not many customers meet it. It is a headline rate. My attrition last year for balance transfers was 9.5 per cent. We have a fairly aggressive retention process where every customer who wants a foreclosure letter is spoken to, their needs are assessed and we try and retain the customer.

How much restructuring have you done?

We did Rs 58 crore of restructuring in the first round on a Rs 4,000 crore AUM. About Rs 26 crore to Rs 27 crore were from customers who were current and not delinquent. In round two, we did a similar number of Rs 58 crore to Rs 60 crore of restructuring. So my total restructuring is about about 2.6 per cent of my total book.

Are you looking at any acquisitions?

We were interested in an HFC buyout earlier this year but the target company pulled out at the last stage. We will be happy to look at acquisition opportunities for an HFC with an AUM of over Rs 1,500 crore. If we don’t get a good acquisition opportunity, we will build it.

What is your strategy for expansion?

We are looking at faster growth now. Last year, we opened 26 branches of Shriram Housing co-located with Shriram City Union Finance in Andhra Pradhesh and Telangana. This year, we had initially planned to get to 100 branches from 26 branches this year. But after our experience in June, we have decided to fast-track it to all branches of Shriram City Union Finance in the two states by September.

Have you become more careful in underwriting customers?

Caution can never be wished away in the lending business. We do not want to do large value loans. We will do restricted LTV. We will not do new to credit customers. There was a time when our new to credit customers were 25 per cent to 30 per cent. Now, it is at about eight per cent to nine per cent. About 80 per cent of our customers have a credit score of more than 700.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Dinesh Khara, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Economic activity started to come back after the second week of June with more vaccinations and opening up of India, says Dinesh Khara, Chairman, SBI. He is of the opinion that inflation is transient in nature due to supply side constraints. Edited excerpts.

Now, that the second wave is almost over– what is your assessment, how large, how deep has been the impact of the second wave on the economy?
My sense is that post second week of June onwards, we are certainly seeing the economic activity coming back, but yes, of course, from middle of April till mid of June things were pretty bad. I would say that the silver lining is that from 16th onwards, things have started looking up and we have seen the situation where unlock has started happening and also the vaccination numbers have started going up. So, that is slowly helping in people to regain the confidence and the economy to recover back. To that extent, it is certainly a very welcome situation.

Has the economic activity gone back to March 2021, not March 2020, I am talking about the time when the first wave had finished and the second wave had not started which is May and April 2021?
In certain areas, yes, but may not be in all areas, for instance, when it comes to the commodity sector, certainly it is moving and there we are very much near to what it was in March 2021 or may be from January to March 2021. When it comes to the consumer demand it is inching towards that, not yet at that level but yes, of course, it is inching. I would say that every subsequent day when the vaccine numbers are improving the confidence is going up. We are inching towards that kind of a normalcy.

In terms of the impact of the second wave, what was the preparedness of SBI?
Well, there was a huge difference particularly during the period of the first wave, it was more like a whole lot of uncertainty which people were grappling with. Well, of course, when the second wave came, it is also attributed to the fact that some of the citizens had lowered their guards and probably partly because of the Covid fatigue also- they were not taking all the precautions, but the redeeming feature is that the vaccine is available during the second wave and people have started getting vaccinated. So, I would say that though the intensity of the second wave was very high but the only thing is that as the vaccine is available and it is now being done at a much faster pace to that extent it has helped people to recover as far as their fear psychosis is concerned.

Are you now concerned about inflation, for the moment we can use the word supply side constraints, but with commodity prices coming back and demand also normalising, could inflation be a real concern?
To my mind, inflation is essentially on account of the supply side factors which is partly attributed to the imbalance in the supply chain side of the corporates. So, I think with the unlock happening, the supply chain imbalance will get addressed and perhaps it will address the supply side challenges also which will certainly help in reducing the inflation. That is how I look at it.

Now, everyone is curious to understand the real impact on NPAs for SBI because of the second wave. First wave moratorium was there but this time around at least on the retail side there is no moratorium. What is your understanding on how this second wave could have impact on NPAs?
Well, of course, some kind of a temporary disruptions were there because the cash flows for the SMEs were certainly affected. But, I would say that the timely announcement of the resolution framework by the RBI, by coming out with the resolution framework for up to 50 crore worth of exposure for SME that has come very handy and it has helped in extending the repayment period and giving the required relief to the SME sector. As far as the housing loans were concerned, there also people are in a position to avail the resolution framework and also have the relief. So, I would say that moratorium may not be there but yes, of course, relief was extended by RBI for resolution, so that has come very handy.

Where do you see credit growth will settle because historically, you have always managed to grow at a credit growth rate which is about a percent, percent-and-a-half higher than the industry?
I would get guided by the projections given by RBI which are indicating some kind of a 7.9% kind of growth and we have generally seen in the past that we have been growing at least 1% over and above what the RBI expect the GDP to grow or maybe for that matter the actual growth of the GDP in the economy. So, if at all the economy grows at about 8%, we expect to grow our loan book at about 9%.

So, when do you see growth coming back both for term loans and for working capital because they are important components to understand which end of the economy is picking up?
I think it would be universally distributed.

What about the retail end of the business? SBI has a very large retail book, given that the number of people affected in the second wave was very large, do you think that end of the business could slow down significantly?
If at all the early indications which I have about the first quarter, it may not be probably as strong for the retail as it was in the last quarter of the previous financial year. So, that is partly attributed to the fact that there was whole lot of challenges of health and hygiene for people and naturally at that point of time, they might not have thought in terms of scaling up their demand for the retail. Going forward, once the economy comes back and once the jobs also restored, perhaps a shortfall which was there in the first quarter would be made up this.

Can I say that for the moment SBI is not worried about delinquencies in the retail book?
Whatever little stress we are seeing, that should be possible for us to pull back because we have seen— for out of 90 days about 60 days was the time when there was no mobility for people, so reaching out to the borrowers was always a challenge. So, I think after 16th of June the mobility has improved and our pace of pulling back any such assets has also improved significantly. As of now, it does not look to be as much of a challenge.

SBI NPAs or NPA cycle is at a five-year low. Can I also say that the second wave is unlikely to change the trajectory because the trajectory has been declining, will the trajectory go slightly off the mark because of the second wave?
As I invariably say, that as far as SBI is concerned, it is proxy to the Indian economy and the shape of Indian economy, the health of Indian economy eventually shows up in the book also. But we do have the capability to manage the book to some extent and that I think we will be ensuring, we will continue to do our bit in terms of ensuring that the asset quality is maintained to be the best in the given situations and circumstances.

In the last three, four years SBI has really unlocked their subsidiaries, it was SBI Life, then last it was SBI Cards. In FY22 will SBI MF go public?
No, it is a joint venture between a French partner Amundi. We are in touch with them and we have to have a unanimous decision on this subject and once we will come to a stage where we would be in a position to announce, we would be more than happy to share that with all of you.

Paytm is planning to go public and their valuations could be anywhere between 20 to 22 billion dollars. Are you somewhere tempted to take Yono public?
I believe that even if we go for any kind of an IPO or any kind of a listing, my objective would be that since the entity would have the SBI names attached to it, the stakeholders should have long term value coming out of it. So, I think temptation is certainly not there and our intention is always to create value for our stakeholders.

SBI has managed to in a sense stand apart in the Covid environment where a lot of banks were struggling with technology, you have managed to keep your technology backbone very solid. That is very impressive, how did you achieve it?
I would attribute it to the urge of the team to achieve the excellence and I think this is something which is more like a value nurtured into the cadre over the years, so eventually that shows up into this kind of a performance.

Would SBI Cards be open to any inorganic acquisition because the Citi Wealth Management and the credit card business is on the block, would you be interested in buying that?
I think when it comes to the question of acquisition, the pricing always matters, so all such decisions have to weigh the pricing and also the opportunity. This will be the guiding factor for any such decision.

There are two interesting trends we spoke about fintech and the other one is consolidation in the PSU banking space, what are your thoughts on both? Fintech is disruptive and the way PSU banking industry is consolidating also could be disruptive and very favourable for large players?In fact, fintechs are as of now operating in a very niche segment, so they are not into a full scale banking operation. To that extent, I would say that it offers an opportunity for the full scale bank like us to collaborate. We are quite open and we are very happy to look at their ideas and incorporate their thoughts and we value whatever incremental value creation they are doing by virtue of having a focus on the customer experience and also a focus leveraging analytics etc. We are happy to incorporate all those into our system and wherever required we are quite happy to collaborate with these fintechs also.

Yes, consolidation is happening and perhaps if I really look at it we continue to have a deposit market share which is around 23% and our loan book market share is somewhere around 20% plus. So, that way I think we feel that we are quite well placed. But having said that, we are quite cognisant of the opportunities which are available and we would like to scale up our market share even further by leveraging technology, analytics and by collaborating with the fintechs.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Over 28% of loans now linked to external benchmarks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The introduction of the external benchmark system for lending and deposit rates has helped in improving the monetary transmission by banks, an RBI article said.

The share of outstanding loans linked to external benchmarks has increased from as low as 2.4 per cent during September 2019 to 28.5 per cent during March 2021, said the article prepared by RBI officials.

“Over the years, the Reserve Bank‘s efforts in improving transmission to deposit and lending rates of banks have started to bear some fruits particularly with the introduction of the external benchmark system,” it said.

The external benchmark system, it added, has incentivised banks to adjust their term as well as saving deposit rates as lending rates undergo frequent adjustments in line with the benchmark rates, to protect their net interest margins thus broadening the scope of transmission across sectors that are not even linked to external benchmarks.

External benchmarks

The RBI had asked banks to link all new floating rate personal or retail loans and floating rate loans to micro and small enterprises (MSEs) to the policy repo rate or 3-month T-bill rate or 6-month T-bill rate or any other benchmark market interest rate published by the Financial Benchmarks India Private Limited (FBIL) from October 1, 2019.

Not just repo: Over 28% of loans now linked to external benchmarks
The adoption of external benchmark-based pricing of loans has strengthened market impulses for a quicker adjustment in deposit rates, the article said. Further, a combination of surplus liquidity conditions amidst weak credit demand conditions has enabled banks to lower their deposit rates.

The lowering of deposit rates has resulted in the decline in the cost of funds for banks, prompting them to reduce their MCLRs (Marginal Cost of Funds based Lending Rate), and in turn their lending rates.

As per the article, the transmission of policy repo rate changes to deposit and lending rates of commercial banks has improved since the introduction of external benchmark-based pricing of loans.

The transmission showed further improvement since March 2020 on account of sizeable policy rate cuts, and persisting surplus liquidity conditions resulting from various system levels as well as targeted measures introduced by the Reserve Bank.

The impact

In response to the cumulative reduction of policy repo rate by 250 basis points (bps), the 1-year median marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR) of banks declined by 155 bps from February 2019 to June 2021.

It further said the pass-through to deposit and lending rates is substantial for foreign banks during the external benchmark lending rate (EBLR) regime.

The public sector banks depend more on retail term deposits and face competition from alternative saving instruments like small savings, which constrains them from lowering deposit rates in sync with the policy repo rate.

Private sector banks have exhibited increased pass-through to lending and deposit rates compared to public sector banks.

“This uneven transmission across bank groups is partly explained by the fact that the share of outstanding loans linked to external benchmark is more for private banks as compared to PSBs,” the article said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Paytm files DRHP for IPO

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


One97 Communications, the parent of Paytm, has filed a draft red herring prospectus with SEBI for its initial public offering. The size of the IPO is Rs 16,600 crore.

The issue comprises a fresh issue of equity shares amounting to Rs 8,300 crore and an offer for sale by existing shareholders of Rs 8,300 crore.

The company also retains the option, in discussion with BRLMs, to undertake a pre-IPO placement of Rs 2,000 crore.

If the pre-IPO placement is completed, the fresh issue size will be reduced to that extent.

As part of the OFS, existing shareholders, including Paytm founder and CEO Vijay Shekhar Sharma, Ant Financial, Alibaba group, Elevation Capital, Saif Partners and BH International Holdings will sell their shares.

The DRHP does not disclose the share price or the stake to be diluted by any of the shareholders.

Shareholders of One97 Communications had cleared the proposal for the IPO on July 12.

Paytm’s revenue from operations was Rs 2,800 crore from 11.4 crore annual transacting users. However, it continued to be loss-making.

Its losses came down by 42.2 per cent to Rs 1,701 crore in 2020-21, from Rs 2,942 crore in 2019-20. Losses amounted to Rs 4,230 crore in 2018-19.

Marketing expenses nearly halved to Rs 532.5 crore in 2020-21 from Rs 1,397.1 crore in 2019-20.

Lead managers appointed to the issue are Morgan Stanley India, Goldman Sachs (India) Securities, ICICI Securities, Axis Capital, JP Morgan India , Citigroup Global Markets India and HDFC Bank.

The IPO is expected to be launched towards the end of November.

 

 

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBL, Yes Bank, Bajaj Finserv most impacted by RBI curbs on Mastercard, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, After the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) restricted Mastercard from on-boarding new customers, among the credit card issuers, including co-brand partners, RBL Bank, Yes Bank and Bajaj Finserv are the most impacted as their entire card schemes are allied with Mastercard.

Japanese brokerage Nomura said in a note that these three entities are the most impacted by the RBI move.

HDFC Bank has 60 per cent of its card schemes tied to Mastercard, Amex and Diners, while for Axis Bank and ICICI Bank, this is about 35-36 per cent.

“That said, we don’t know the individual card schemes’ contribution to the overall profitability of the issuers to assess the potential impact,” it added.

HDFC Bank is already restricted from issuing new cards, and hence is not incrementally impacted. On the other hand, Kotak’s card portfolio is entirely allied to Visa and hence it won’t face any issues.

The managements of both Axis Bank and ICICI Bank have in the recent past talked about their cobranded cards with Flipkart and Amazon, respectively, to be the fastest-growing card schemes. These card schemes are 14 per cent and 15 per cent of outstanding cards for Axis and ICICI, respectively.

While the Amazon ICICI card is allied to Visa, the Flipkart Axis card is allied to Mastercard, and hence is a potential medium-term risk, should the current status-quo continue, Nomura said.

The RBI on Wednesday restricted Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd from onboarding new customers across all its card products (debit, credit and prepaid) from July 22, 2021.

The RBI had earlier put similar restrictions on both American Express Bank (Amex) and Diners Club International (Discover Financial Services).

“This leaves only Visa Inc and homegrown NPCI’s RuPay as payment providers under no restrictions currently. We don’t know if Visa has fulfilled all the requirements of data localisation as envisaged in the Storage of Payment System Data circular of the RBI,” Nomura said.

“In the near term, we don’t foresee any material impact on card issuers (especially credit card issuers), but there could be a medium-term impact if this situation persists,” it added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Former RBI DG, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: The government’s move to privatise two state-owned lenders presents an “exciting” opportunity for investors looking to get into the business, former RBI Deputy Governor N S Vishwanathan on Thursday said.

What is good for the country will have to be looked at while deciding on the entity, which will be granted a license, he said while speaking at an event of industry lobby IMC Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

Replying to suggestions asking for entry of corporates and concerns over ownership and voting caps, Vishwanathan said world over, including the developed countries, there are restrictions on who is allowed to start a bank, which deals with people’s deposits.

On the point of corporates having the capital to plough into an entity, he said a real economy entity will also be affected by stress in the broader economy and we ought to defend against the stress from other businesses seeping into a bank.

“The government’s thought process of privatising a couple of public sector banks provides an excitable opportunity in that space,” Vishwanathan, who used to handle the all-important banking regulation and supervision functions at the central bank, said.

Vishwanathan said while the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) did well in the initial days, concerns are coming out over the recovery ratios lately and stressed that the same needs to be “addressed”. The remarks came in the light of the resolution in the Videocon case, where lenders have been offered only 5 per cent recovery.

Abizer Diwanji of consultancy firm EY said defaults are bound to happen in the banking business, but one has to deal with them upfront rather than taking 5-7 years to deal with it.

The delay in resolving the stress can erode value, which can be realised, he said, adding that the assets that are yielding very low-resolution percentages could fetch upwards of 50 per cent if the resolution attempts were made earlier.

Vishwanathan said we will first have to resolve whether to allow corporates or not before deliberating on whether those having NBFCs should be given the opportunity to run a bank.

Warburg Pincus‘ Narendra Ostawal said private equity firms like his will be interested in investing in the bank privatisation process and see it as a “huge opportunity”.

“The core issue here is regulatory. What is the extent of economic ownership and governance control an owner would get through the privatisation process? I think that will drive the success,” he said.

The PEs need degrees of freedom in terms of governance and commensurate ownership like getting new management, he said, adding more fractured ownership you have, the tougher it is to build consensus around the turnaround.

Vishwanathan said all over the world, banks have a dispersed holding structure and added that the promoter is required to have a certain level of ownership as well.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI proposes changes in fund raising norms of urban co-operative banks, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has proposed changes in rules for fundraising by primary (urban) co-operative banks. On Wednesday, the central bank released a draft circular for issue and regulation of share capital and securities of primary (urban) co-operative banks.

“UCBs are permitted to raise equity share capital, as hitherto, by way of issue of equity shares to persons within their area of operation enrolled as members, in accordance with the provisions of their bye-laws, and issue of additional equity shares to the existing members,” it said.

The RBI has proposed that any refund of share capital to members, or their nominees, should be subject to the certain conditions — the bank’s capital adequacy ratio is 9 per cent or above, both as per the latest audited financial statements and the last CRAR as assessed by the RBI during statutory inspection.

Such refund should not result in the bank’s capital adequacy falling below regulatory minimum of 9 per cent. The RBI has directed cooperative banks to ensure their investors are educated on the risk characteristics of regulatory capital requirements.

It has also asked cooperative banks to have a specific sign-off from the investors to ensure they have understood the features and risks of the instruments. The urban co-operative banks have been asked to not benchmark floating rate instruments to the fixed deposit rate.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Debasish Panda, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The pandemic underscored India’s disruptive progress on the touchstone of financial inclusion, with federal welfare payouts directly reaching the intended beneficiaries in a largely fraud-proof ecosystem undergirded by legacy lenders, nimble fintech firms and pertinent digital regulations. “Financial inclusion was actually tried and tested in terms of scale and volume during the pandemic,” financial services secretary Debasish Panda said at the ET Financial Inclusion Summit. Reliance on the digital infrastructure largely cut out the scope of pilferage in the distribution of federal welfare packages, Panda said.

“This is thanks to the vision of our PM, who thought so in 2015,” Panda said. “Today, it’s a reality and during the pandemic, we used it to the full extent.” Panda said that the government has been asking banks to partner with fintechs, as these new-age firms operate in different ecosystems and geographies, carving out innovative solutions.

“What we are doing now is bringing more, new-to-credit micro enterprises in the formal banking channel. We are taking help from fintechs, carving out innovative solutions for segments and geographies,” he said, adding that fintech firms are trying to connect alternative data points. “I don’t have a credit history but I have a spending history; so they collect those sets of data, do an analysis, use technology and then build a dossier for that individual which then becomes comfortable for the bank to lend,” he said, adding that banks and insurance companies also see value here. Panda said that the regulatory arrangement is already there for fintech firms to operate. “The RBI and IRDAI have provided a sandbox kind of an arrangement where fintech or insurance tech can try and test it on the ground and once the proof of concept is established, they can straightway get the licence and carry the work forward,” he said.

The financial services secretary noted that the basic tenets of the financial inclusion plan are banking the unbanked, securing the unsecured and funding the unfunded. “The three pillars have then created a digital pipeline of Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhaar and the Mobile (JAM), which have built a regular flow of benefits and services,” he said. The number of Jan Dhan accounts stand at 420 million, and more than 55% of these belong to women beneficiaries. Panda said that through opening bank accounts, the initial target was to saturate every household.

“The next target was to saturate every adult and that has also happened to a large extent; there are certain pockets where there is a little shortfall and work is in progress,” he said. The government is now identifying districts not matching with the national-level average. The government further aims to ensure availability of a banking touchpoint for any habitat within a radius of 5 kilometres.

Panda noted that micro finance institutions have the connect with the last-mile borrower. “Banks are tying up with MFIs under the co-lending arrangement of the RBI, where the interest gets blended so it comes down also to the end borrower and the credit is flowing,” he said.

Panda said that the transition toward New India is gathering pace. “We are trying to power India toward a $5-trillion economy; so unless we take this population above that threshold, we will be left behind. So efforts are on,” he said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Mastercard ban to hit banks’ card operations, income

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


India’s decision to ban Mastercard Inc for non-compliance with data storage rules has unsettled the country’s financial sector as it will disrupt banks’ card offerings and hit revenues, payments and banking industry executives told Reuters.

Wednesday’s central bank order followed similar action in April against American Express, but Mastercard is a much bigger player in the Indian market, where many lenders offer cards using the US firm’s payments network.

A Reuters analysis of online card listings of 11 domestic and foreign banks in India showed Mastercard accounted for about a third of roughly 100 debit cards on offer, and more than 75credit card variants used its network.

RBI action on Mastercard: SBI Card sees minimal impact on its new customer acquisitions

From July 22, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said, new issuance of such cards will stop as Mastercard did not comply with 2018 rules requiring foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally for “unfettered supervisory access”.

Though existing customers will not be hit, business impact will be significant as banks need to sign new commercial deals with rival networks such as Visa, a process that can take months and involve weeks of back-end technology integration,five payment and banking executives said.

One banking executive said the switch to Visa could take as long as five months. And with American Express and Mastercard prohibited, Visa gets an unprecedented advantage in negotiations in a credit card market it already dominates.

“It will mean temporary disruption for banks, a lot of hectic negotiations and loss of business in the short term,” said one of the sources, a senior Indian banker.

“This is consistent with our considerable and continued investments in our customers and partners in India to advance the government’s Digital India vision,” Mastercard said in a statement on Thursday.

Bar on Mastercard: YES Bank, Bajaj Finserv, RBL to be most affected

The decision is a major setback for Mastercard, which counts India as a key market. In 2019, Mastercard said it was “bullish on India”, announcing $1 billion in investment over the next five years, after investing $1 billion from 2014 to 2019.

Mastercard also has research and technology centres in India, where its workforce of 4,000 is the second largest after the United States, having grown from 29 in 2013.

High card usage, income impact

Indians’ use of credit and debit cards has risen as digital payments have spread. By May, RBI data shows, there were more than 62 million credit cards and about 902 million debit cards,which together accounted for transactions worth $40.4 billion.

The delays in transition to Visa are also seen hitting bank fees and other incomes they generate from their cards business,the sources said.

In a research note on RBI’s decision, Macquarie flagged as a “key concern” the risk that banks could suffer as credit cards were a profitable product with a so-called post-tax return on assets of around 5-6 per cent.

Some banks, such as India’s RBL, lists 42 credit cards on its website, all using the Mastercard network, while Yes Bank lists seven using Mastercard, though none on Visa. The Citibank website offers four Mastercard credit cards.

RBL said in a statement on Thursday that it had reached a pact with Visa for its credit cards after the RBI order, but integration would take up to 10 weeks.

One of the sources said, however, that negotiations for the deal had taken six months.

RBL said it had a share of five per cent in the credit card market but its issuance of 100,000 new cards each month could potentially be affected. Its stock fell more than three per cent in early trade.

Yes Bank in a statement said it is “evaluating migration to other platforms for seamless transition” for issuing new credit cards. A Citibank spokesperson told Reuters it was working with its partner Mastercard “to evaluate any potential impact”.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI announces G-SAP 2.0 auction; includes illiquid paper

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The total trades took place in an announced bonds on Thursday is just 10% of the total trades of most liquid paper in the market.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Thursday announced a second tranche of purchase of government securities under Government Securities Acquisition Programme (G-SAP 2.0) worth Rs 20,000 crore, but included illiquid papers for the second time in a row.

This time, the central bank included 6.18%-2024, 6.97%-2026, 8.20%-2028, and 6.79%-2029 gilts, which have a low trading volumes in the market. The total trades took place in an announced bonds on Thursday is just 10% of the total trades of most liquid paper in the market.

“Currently banks and PDs are stuck with a lot of illiquid papers due to the devolvement which took place in some weekly bond auctions, so RBI is trying to buy these papers under G-SAP and selling more liquid papers to make it more liquid,” a fund manager with a mid-sized fund house said.

The RBI, in a weekly bond auction to be held on July 15, is offering two most liquid papers such as 5.63%-2026 and 6.64%-2035. The multiple price method will be followed in which each successful bidder pays the price stated in his bid. In ‘uniform price’ auctions, all successful bidders pay the same price that is cut-off price at which the market clears the issue. So far, the RBI had purchased nearly Rs 1 lakh crore under G-SAP 1.0 and planned to buy Rs 1.2 lakh crore worth of outstanding government securities during July-September of 2021.

During the first G-SAP 2.0 auction on July 8, which was announced in the governor’s statement on June 4, the RBI purchased 8.24%-2027, 7.17%-2028, 7.59%-2029, 7.88%-2030, and 7.57%-2033 gilts. However, during G-SAP 1.0, the central bank had mostly purchased 5.85%-2030, which was most liquid and benchmark bond before announcement of new one 6.10%-2031.

The announcement of G-SAP, dealers said, was made to anchor the bond yields and make hefty government borrowing cheaper. During financial year 2020-21, the government had borrowed around Rs 12.8 lakh crore and another Rs 12.05 lakh crore is scheduled for current financial year.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 254 255 256 257 258 540