SBI Life Insurance Q1 net profit down 43%

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SBI Life Insurance registered a 42.9 per cent drop in its net profit in the first quarter of the fiscal year, as the insurer makes additional reserves for future Covid-19 claims.

The private sector life insurer reported net profit of ₹223.16 crore for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 as against ₹390.89 crore in the same period last fiscal.

It made additional reserves amounting to ₹444.72 crore towards Covid-19 pandemic for future claims.

SBI Life Insurance said it saw a 1.28 times increase in the number of claims reported in the first quarter of 2021-22 compared to the first quarter last fiscal.

The total number of Covid-19 claims for this quarter was 8,956 for the insurer. In value terms, the claims net of reinsurance amounted to ₹570 crore.

“Mortality experience is in line with the assumptions,” SBI Life Insurance said in its investor presentation.

Its net premium income increased by 9.5 per cent on a year on year basis to ₹8,312.55 crore in the first quarter of the fiscal from ₹7,588.09 crore a year ago. Total income however fell 2.7 per cent to ₹15,736.91 crore on an annual basis due to lower income from investments. Value of new business increased by 45 per cent to ₹340 crore in the first quarter of the fiscal.

Its 13-month persistency ratio improved by 295 basis points to 84.5 per cent as on June 30.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks feel the regulatory heat as RBI imposes penalties amid pandemic shadow, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As it moves to risk-based supervision, the Reserve Bank of India has stepped up the heat on banks.

In the first half of this year, the central bank has imposed fines of over Rs 43 crore on 23 banks for various regulatory non-compliances and lapses. The RBI had imposed a fine of Rs 20 crore on eight banks in 2020.

After the Nirav Modi scam, RBI had stepped up its surveillance and imposed a hefty Rs 143 crore fine on 49 banks in 2019. While the amount of fine was small individually in 2019, the RBI has increased it multifold as it has fined HDFC BankRs 10 crore, Bank of India Rs 4 core, Punjab National Bank Rs 2 crore and SBI Rs 50 lakh.

In January this year, the central bank had imposed Rs 2 crore penalties on Deutsche Bank and Standard Chartered Bank. It has imposed penalties on various cooperative banks during the year.

Risk based supervison

In May this year the Reserve Bank has decided to review and strengthen the Risk Based Supervision (RBS) of the banking sector with a view to enable financial sector players to address the emerging challenges.

The RBI uses the RBS model, including both qualitative and quantitative elements, to supervise banks, urban cooperatives banks, non-banking financial companies and all India financial institutions.

“It is now intended to review the supervisory processes and mechanism in order to make the extant RBS model more robust and capable of addressing emerging challenges, while removing inconsistencies, if any,” the RBI said while inviting bids from technical experts/consultants to carry forward the process for banks.

In case of UCBs and NBFCs, the Expression of Interest (EOI) for ‘Consultant for Review of Supervisory Models’ said the supervisory functions pertaining to commercial banks, UCBs and NBFCs are now integrated, with the objective of harmonising the supervisory approach based on the activities/size of the supervised entities (SEs).

“It is intended to review the existing supervisory rating models under CAMELS approach for improved risk capture in forward looking manner and for harmonising the supervisory approach across all SEs,” it said.

Annual financial inspection of UCBs and NBFCs is largely based on CAMELS model (Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Systems & Control).

The RBI undertakes supervision of SEs with the objective of assessing their financial soundness, solvency, asset quality, governance framework, liquidity, and operational viability, so as to protect depositors’ interests and financial stability.

The Reserve Bank conducts supervision of the banks through offsite monitoring of the banks and an annual inspection of the banks, where applicable.

In the case of Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) and NBFCs, it conducts the supervision through a mix offsite monitoring and on-site inspection, where applicable.

A technical advisory group consisting of senior officers of the RBI would examine the documents submitted by the applicants in connection with EOI.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ICICI Bank shares hit 52-week high post Q1 earnings

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi, July 26 Shares of ICICI Bank on Monday gained over 1 per cent and touched 52-week high on the bourses after the company’s June quarter net profit zoomed 52 per cent. The stock rose by 1.29 per cent to ₹685.40 — its 52-week high — on the BSE. At the NSE, it gained 1.30 per cent to ₹685.45 — its 52-week high.

Profits driven by lower provisions

ICICI Bank’s June quarter net profit zoomed 52 per cent to ₹4,747.42 crore, driven majorly by lower provisions but reported an increase in stress from the retail loans segment.

On a standalone basis, the second-largest private sector lender by assets posted a net profit of ₹4,616.02 crore for the reporting quarter, up by 77 per cent when compared with the national lockdown-hit April-June period of FY21. The earnings were announced on Saturday.

The gross NPAs came at 5.15 per cent against 4.96 per cent in the quarter-ago period and 5.46 per cent in the year-ago period.

Also read: ICICI Bank Q1 net profit zooms 78% to ₹4,616 crore

The provision line saw some activity in the reporting quarter, including a change in accounting norms to be more conservative which led to ₹1,127 crore additional impact and a write-back of ₹1,050 crore from Covid provisions as the bank grew more confident of the overall asset quality situation exiting the quarter with a ₹6,425 crore buffer.

The overall provisions came at ₹2,852 crore, nearly a third of the ₹7,594 crore set aside for the year-ago period despite an increase in the gross non-performing assets (NPA) ratio.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Exposure of banks, financial institutions to real estate at $100 billion; 67% loans safe, says Anarock

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks and other financial institutions have an exposure of $100 billion to real estate sector, of which 67 per cent are safe while the remaining loans are under pressure or severely stressed, according to real estate consultant Anarock.

“At least 67 per cent (or approximately $67 billion) of the total loan advances ($100 billion) to Indian real estate by banks, NBFCs and HFCs is currently completely stress-free,” Anarock Capital, a subsidiary of Anarock, said in a statement on Monday.

Another 15 per cent (about $15 billion) is under some pressure but has scope for resolution with certainty on at least the principal amount.

“$18 billion (or 18 per cent) of the overall lending to Indian real estate is under ‘severe’ stress, implying that there has been high leveraging by the concerned developers who have either limited or extremely poor visibility of debt servicing due to multiple factors,” the statement said.

Contribution of NBFCs and HFCs

Anarock Capital said the overall contribution of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) and housing finance companies (HFCs), including trusteeships, towards the total lending to Indian real estate is at 63 per cent.

Individually, banks have a share of 37 per cent, followed by HFCs at around 34 per cent, and NBFCs 16 per cent. Around 13 per cent loans have been given under trusteeships.

According to Anarock Capital, banks and HFCs are much better placed with 75 per cent and 66 per cent of their lending book in a comfortable position.

“Not surprisingly, nearly 46 per cent of the total NBFC lending is on the watchlist,” the statement said.

About 75 per cent of the total lending to Grade A developers is safe.

“This presents a comfortable outlook because out of the total loans given to real estate, more than $73 billion is given to Grade A builders,” the statement said.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Net profit rises 32% YoY to Rs 1,642 cr; asset quality weakens, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


MUMBAI: Kotak Mahindra Bank today reported a 32 per cent year-on-year rise in its net profit to Rs 1,641.9 crore for the quarter ended June, which was below analysts’ expectations.

The private sector lender reported net interest income growth of 6 per cent on-year to Rs 3,942 crore, which was also below analysts’ estimates.

Provisions and contingencies in the quarter declined to Rs 935 crore from Rs 962 crore in the year-ago quarter. However, the lender saw a deterioration in asset quality in the reported quarter.

Kotak Bank’s gross non-performing loans ratio stood at 3.56 per cent in the reported quarter as against 3.25 per cent at the end of the March quarter. Similarly, the net NPA ratio expanded to 1.28 per cent from 1.21 per cent in the previous quarter.


The private sector bank’s net profit in the quarter was largely boosted by a sharp uptick in other income. Other income in the reported quarter jumped to Rs 1,583.03 crore from Rs 773.5 crore in the year-ago quarter.

Covid-related provisions as on June 30 were maintained at Rs 1,279 crore. In accordance with the Resolution Framework for Covid-19 and MSME announced by the RBI, the bank implemented total restructuring of Rs 552 crore as on June 30, Kotak Bank said.


In terms of loan growth, the quarter was tepid for the bank affected by the second wave as well as its conservative approach. Advances in the quarter grew merely 6 per cent on-year, which was lower than many of its peers.

At the same time, the current account-to-savings account ratio of the lender further improved to 60.2 per cent at the end of the June quarter from 56.7 per cent a year ago.

Kotak Bank’s operating performance was sturdy as operating profit jumped 19 per cent year-on-year to Rs 3,121 crore in the reported quarter.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Public sector banks recover Rs 1 lakh crore from written-off accounts, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Public banks have recovered around Rs 1 lakh crore they had written off in the last few years, according to finance ministry officials.

There has been discussion around “write-off” of over Rs 8 lakh crore during the last seven years, the government
believes that these are technical in nature and are actually meant to bring about transparency in bank balance sheets.

The steps taken by the government over the last few years — from enacting Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code and strengthening other laws to administrative measures — have helped banks recover around Rs 5.5 lakh crore of bad debt including Rs 99,996 from accounts that had been technically written off. Banks have used multiple sources — accruals, fundraising from the market and capital infusion by the government — to comply with the regulatory requirements.

Internal accruals and market raising account for as much as 70% of the provisioning done during the last few years.

The write-offs

Public sector banks have written off a massive Rs 8 lakh crore worth of loans since 2014, more than double the capital of Rs 3.37 lakh crore infused by the government in them.

The highest infusion was in fiscal 2019 when Rs 1.06 lakh crore were infused while in 2020-21, the government put in Rs 14,500 crore into four public sector banks.

The maximum write-offs were in fiscal 2019 at Rs 1.83 lakh crore, following by FY20 at Rs 1.75 lakh crore.

Reduction in non-performing assets due to write-offs for public sector banks stood at Rs 1,31,894 crore during fiscal 2020-21.

In FY2019-20, the number stood at Rs 1,75,877 crore, the RBI said

In the last seven years, bank credit to the industrial sector dropped to 28.9% in 2021 as compared to 42.7% in 2014. Credit to the retail sector grew from 16.2% to 26.3% in the last seven years.

The comparison

The loans write-off between 2015 and 2019 were more than three times compared to the figures of bad loans written off during the previous Congress-led UPA regime from 2004-2014, as per an RTI revelation.

During the UPA’s 10-year rule, around Rs2,20,328 crore was written off by various banks, and this figure shot up to Rs 7,94,354 crore during the NDA regime from 2015-2019, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the banks’ NPAs.

The RTI reply figures around two-dozen public sector banks (PSBs), some three-dozen in the private sector, nine scheduled commercial banks, a four-dozen foreign banks, and several in each category not written off any loans.

Of the loan write-offs in the UPA decade (2004-2014), the PSBs accounted for approximately Rs 1,58,994 crore, while the private banks’ amounts were Rs41,391 crore and for foreign banks it was Rs 19,945 crore, with no write-offs by Scheduled Banks.

Later, in the NDA regime (2015-2019), the PSBs accounted for a stupendous Rs 6,24,370 crore loan write-off, with the private banks writing off Rs 1,51,989 crore and the foreign banks shared the remaining 17,995 crore, (Total—Rs7,94,354 crore), besides an additional write-off by scheduled banks totalling Rs 1,295 crore (Total – Rs 7,95,649 crore).



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

With new acquisition, Razorpay aims to double monthly loan disbursals

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


As three fintech majors get ready for an IPO later this year, Harshil Mathur-led Razorpay is betting on its product capabilities to stay competitive. Last week, this Bengaluru-based unicorn acquired an AI start-up, TERA Finlabs, to boost its SME lending vertical — Razorpay Capital.

With this acquisition, Razorpay expects to double its monthly loan disbursals from the current ₹300-400 crore to ₹800-1000 crore by the end of this financial year, co-founder Mathur told BusinessLine.

Razorpay gives out loans to small businesses that are already using Razorpay payments and banking services. The company does not have a lending license in India and it basically acts as a bridge between small businesses and banks, enabling loans for small business owners who might not be creditworthy under the traditional bank underwriting process.

This makes loan underwriting the core proposition of Razorpay Capital. A good underwriting process would mean more earnings for the company with each successful loan disbursal and repayment. And so, the primary reason behind TERA Finlabs’ acquisition was to make Razorpay’s loan underwriting faster and better.

Network

Razorpay claims to have 5 million small businesses using Razorpay’s payment services in various forms. This existing network gives them access to interesting data points on SMEs, such as what kind of customers they have, does the business have customers across the country or just one city, the repeat rate of these customers, and whether the customers use iPhone or Android devices, among other things.

“Some of these data points will be useful for lending, some of them will not. But it takes a lot of effort to arrive at that conclusion. You need to have a team of data scientists and analysts, who will look at all that data, give out certain loans, look at the repayments, NPAs and then create this model again. That is the traditional way of doing it,” said Mathur.

With the acquisition of TERA Finlabs, Razorpay will be able to input all this data into TERA Finlabs’ AI model, and the algorithm will churn out a credit score for each SME. The AI model will then keep iterating based on the success or failure of each loan disbursal. As the company disburses more loans, the AI model keeps getting better.

“To ensure that our risk model becomes stronger over time is a very strong addition to us. If we were to do it ourselves, we would have to spend a lot of time and energy to create that whole team and come up with this AI model. But with the acquisition, we get both the team and product, right on day one,” he added.

Funding history

Founded in 2014 by Mathur and Shashank Kumar, Razorpay has raised a total of $366.5 million from marquee investors like Tiger Global, Sequoia Capital India, Ribbit Capital, Matrix Partners, and Y Combinator. About 10,000 businesses are said to have benefited from the company’s lending vertical till now.

Commenting on the upcoming start-up IPOs and their impact on Razorpay, Mathur said that the entire startup ecosystem is excited about the upcoming IPOs, including Razorpay. He added that if the IPOs are successful, it would eventually boost the valuations and fundraising activity for the private start-ups as well. “But I don’t worry about them (Paytm, MobiKwik) as competition, because we are business first company (B2B), unlike a lot of the other players. I don’t think anyone understands businesses as well as we do,” he added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Govt set to extend tenures of MDs of PNB, UCO, Bank of Maha, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The finance ministry has moved a file for extension of tenure of three public sector banks’ managing directors, including Punjab National Bank (PNB), according to sources.

Besides, the ministry has also recommended the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) for extension of 10 executive directors (EDs) of various public sector banks.

Tenure extension

The three-year term of S S Mallikarjuna Rao, MD and CEO of PNB, is coming to an end on September 18 but the finance ministry has recommended for extension for four months till January 31, 2022, when Rao attains his superannuation age of 60 years.

Atul Kumar Goel’s term as MD and CEO of UCO Bank has been recommended for a two-year extension beyond November 1 this year. A S Rajeev, MD and CEO of Bank of Maharashtra, has been suggested for an extension of two years beyond December 1.

The finance ministry has simultaneously forwarded the name of S L Jain for the appointment of MD and CEO of Indian Bank. The BBB, the headhunter for state-owned banks and financial institutions, had recommended the name of Jain in May after the interview, according to reports.

With regard to EDs, the ministry has recommended names of 10 for extension of their term till their superannuation age or two years, whichever is earlier.

The MD and CEO of a public sector undertaking is given a maximum tenure of five years as a government guidelines.

The ministry sought extension of the executives from the Appointments Committee of Cabinet (ACC). The proposal has been sent to the Dof Personnel and Training for the same after consultation with BBB. The final call for extension will be taken by the ACC.

Board seats vacant

Ten of the 12 public-sector banks, except State Bank of India (SBI) and Bank of Baroda do not have a chairman.

Also, most non-official director posts, which are occupied by professionals from other fields, remain vacant. There are no employee representatives on PSB boards at present.

A large bank can have four executive directors, six non-official directors (of whom up to three could be shareholder directors), a workman director, and an employee director, in addition to a nominee each of government and the RBI, the non-executive chairman and MD & CEO.

With posts vacant, banks are finding it difficult to fill the quorum of their board sub-committee meetings such as risk management, capital raising, audit and even management committee meetings.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Indian startups increasingly raising debt to fund operations

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


While private equity investments and initial public offerings are in vogue, many Indian startups are also increasingly raising debt to fund their operations.

According to data accessed by BusinessLine from Tracxn, conventional debt has seen a 5-year CAGR of 40.27 per cent till 2020 while venture debt grew by 21.86 per cent.

Venture debt investments ballooned in 2019, though 2020 was comparatively dull due to the pandemic. Around $4,384.43 million was raised through conventional debt across 131 rounds, an increase of over 260 percent as compared to $1215.38 million raised in 2018 across 111 rounds. For venture debt, this figure stood at $144.89 million in 2019 across 47 rounds, growing 63.7 per cent from $85.51 million raised over 38 rounds in 2018. In 2021, year-to-date, the numbers have been equally promising. Conventional debt so far accounted for $2554.58 million across 64 rounds and venture debt stood at $88.15 across 25 rounds.

“The asset class (venture debt) has seen a useful convergence of higher awareness among founders, need for more cash buffer due to Covid, a better understanding of the use cases of debt and finally, increased availability of debt capital. As an illustration, Alteria has funded more than $90 million of debt across over 20 companies in the first six months of 2021 which used to be the entire market size just a few years ago,” Vinod Murali, managing partner, Alteria Capital told BusinessLine.

Devendra Agrawal, founder and CEO, Dexter Capital Advisors said , “In India, venture debt is a comparatively new segment. We are still at least 20-30 years behind as compared to markets like the UK. Venture debt is becoming popular among start-up founders as they don’t have to dilute their stake. Also, it is more certain and quicker to raise funding from a venture debt fund than a venture capital fund. Venture capital firms are more stringent with diligence and checking track records of the start-ups as compared to venture debt firms, who know they will end up making at least 15 per cent in return.”

“In terms of size, venture debt is still way smaller than the share of equity funding. Right now, it is less than 5 per cent and I would like to believe it will eventually grow to become 25 per cent of the size of equity funding as an asset class, where it will stabilise,” Agrawal added.

Top sectors

As per Tracxn, the top five sectors that opted for venture debt in the five-year period starting from 2016 include the consumer sector which accounted for 119 rounds of funding, retail with 75 rounds; transportation and logistics tech with 33 rounds, food and agriculture technology with 31 rounds, and fintech with 21 rounds respectively.

“There are some sectors which need a relatively higher level of leverage such as the Thrasio model where apart from identification of good brands and strong execution, the business model needs the right mix of leverage and equity. In the same way, there are several credit engines within B2B models as well as broader financial services which need venture debt to allow for proof points and basic illustration of their business model. These have recently become strong use cases for venture debt. Other interesting sectors include edtech, healthcare, agritech, SaaS and consumer companies,” Murali said.

Advantages of venture debt

Most of these deals happen at interest rates starting from 12-13 per cent and going up to 18 per cent for a period of one to three years depending on the size, plans and track record of the start-ups.

“Often an early-stage start-up would opt for debt to extend their cash runway and ensure that the next round of equity funding happens at a higher valuation. Even a $100-million start-up would be looking at venture debt as an option to access faster working capital to scale and expand into other verticals. They don’t want to do it using equity money as it is very expensive,” Ankur Bansal, co-founder and director, BlackSoil Capital told BusinessLine.

Bansal added, “Usually, we think a 15-18 per cent interest on debt is so high, but equity is much more expensive. They don’t come at a 15 per cent interest rate of return; the investors are coming for an IRR of 30-40 per cent even for an early-stage start-up. That’s the kind of return they are looking for, and in a 5-8 year period this can amount to a lot.”

Moreover, depending on the business models, start-ups tend to opt for a mix of equity funding and venture debt. Often money raised through venture debt is used as a buffer to keep the business running and growing between two rounds of equity funding.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Visa complies with RBI’s data localisation norms

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Visa has become one of the first global financial services companies to have complied with the Reserve Bank of India’s data localisation norms. This will pave the way for the California-based payment gateway company to garner a larger market share in India at a time when its rivals, including Mastercard and American Express, have been barred from taking new users for not complying with the data localisation rules.

“Visa can keep on-boarding customers and work with Indian players for issuing debit and credit cards since they have complied with the data localisation norms,” said a top banking industry source.

 

Visa did not respond to an email query from BusinessLine but most of the banks which had exclusive partnerships with Mastercard confirmed that they are in the process of shifting their card network to the remaining two players — Visa and home-grown RuPay.

 

Huge market

The advantage for Visa may be greater given its global presence and reward points. At stake is a market that accounted for a total credit card spend of ₹54,700 crore in May 2021. “May 2021 credit card spend remained higher than monthly credit card spend between April and September 2020,” said a recent report by ICICI Securities. Most lenders have become ambitious in credit card roll-outs, eyeing a greater portion of spending by existing customers.

According to RBI data, there were 6.23 crore outstanding credit cards as of May 31, 2021, and 90.23 crore debit cards.

“The ban was a clearly thought out move which ensures that the RBI’s norms are taken seriously and complied with fully while ensuring that banks have enough partners to issue cards,” said an industry source.

RuPay and Visa

“Data localisation is good for the country in terms of control of data and governance of these companies. Visa, being the dominant player in terms of credit cards and also RuPay get an advantage as others like Mastercard, American Express and Diners Club have been barred as of now. Larger banks already have at least two issuing partners on board but smaller banks with only Mastercard are now looking for alternatives. We have been intimated by MasterCard that is submitting supplementary audit system report for the year 2021 to the RBI but it is not certain when the ban will be lifted,” said Vishwas Patel, Chairman, Payments Council of India and Executive Director, Infibeam Avenues Limited.

According to market estimates, RuPay has the largest number of cards in force in the market and Visa has the second largest market share. Visa, being a global brand, now has the opportunity to bridge the gap with the biggest player in this segment, RuPay.

Lenders including RBL Bank, Federal Bank, and Yes Bank, which had exclusive tie ups with Mastercard for credit cards, are now working on new partnerships. While RBL Bank has tied up with Visa, Federal Bank and Yes Bank are in talks with both Visa and RuPay.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 240 241 242 243 244 540