Decision-day Guide, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Anirban Nag

India’s monetary policy makers are likely to leave interest rates untouched for a seventh straight meeting, as their focus remains more on fixing a fickle economy than on controlling stubborn price pressures.

The Reserve Bank of India’s six-member Monetary Policy Committee is meeting amid weak indicators raising doubts about the economy’s ability to sustain a nascent recovery. Some parts of the nation, where the fast-spreading delta variant was first identified, are still battling a rise in Covid-19 infections with researchers warning of an impending third wave of the pandemic.

All 21 economists surveyed by Bloomberg as of Wednesday afternoon expect the MPC to leave the benchmark repurchase rate unchanged at 4% on Friday. While the RBI is widely expected to announce another tranche of its so-called government securities acquisition program, bond traders will be watching for any cues on return to policy normalization.

For now, Governor Shaktikanta Das has maintained that growth is the main challenge and that inflation, while sticky, is only a “transitory hump.”

Here’s what to watch for in the MPC decision to be announced by Das in Mumbai on Friday morning:
Inflation ‘Chameleon’
The governor is likely to bump up the RBI’s inflation forecasts, given the ripple effect of a sustained rise in input costs along with high fuel taxes.

Headline inflation is already hovering well above the upper tolerance limit of the central bank’s 2%-6% target band, and some economists see the measure breaching the RBI’s 5.1% outlook for this fiscal year to end up in the region of 5.5%, or thereabouts.

“Several inflation drivers have come and gone,” said Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC Holdings Plc. in Mumbai. “But inflation has stayed elevated, like a chameleon, adapting itself rather quickly to the driver of the day. In recent months, price pressures have spread widely across the food and core baskets.”

Growth Prospects
The central bank is likely to retain its growth estimate of 9.5% for the year to March 2022.

A slew of high frequency indicators from purchasing managers’ surveys to mobility indicators and tax collections indicate a rather uneven recovery from the pandemic’s second wave. Hopes that the monsoon rains, which have been below normal in July, will pick up in the August-September period and provide a boost to rural demand is likely to provide some comfort to policy makers who are focused on reviving growth.

Normalization or Not?
With inflation running near the upper end of the RBI’s target and the economy showing signs of a recovery, bond investors are of the view that the central bank could signal when it intends to start unwinding some of its extraordinary easy policy.

Although Das has reiterated that normalization is not on his mind yet, economists are of the view that stubborn inflation could force his hand.

Withdrawing some of the excess funds in the banking system via longer dated reverse repo auctions — an action it took at the start of the calendar year — could be a start of that process. Bloomberg Economics estimates excess cash is at over 8 trillion rupees ($107.8 billion).

RBI's policy rates anchored at lows despite inflation: Decision-day Guide
“The RBI could re-announce the long tenor variable rate reverse repo auctions as the first step toward normalization,” wrote Samiran Chakraborty, chief India economist at Citigroup Global Markets in Mumbai. “Beyond that, the MPC is unlikely to provide much guidance on the timing and pace of normalization.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Chakri Lokapriya, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


SBI’s credit costs have come down and it looks like SBI has executed well, given the tough macro environment. The Covid related provisioning are largely within expectation and gives comfort that numbers for other banks will also hopefully be in line or better, says Chakri Lokapriya, CIO & MD, TCG AMC.

Just looking at SBI’s performance, the big takeaway from the numbers is the asset quality outcome, the fact that they have managed to brave the Covid-19 second wave impact. Slippages have come in at 2.47%, of which, a significant amount has already been pulled back in July. Do you think that is something that is going down well with the street?
It is absolutely right because going into the quarter, the economic backdrop had the services economy still in a contraction while the manufacturing sector was moving by stops and starts. There was a fear that slippages would increase from industries that take loans from SBI.

Now those slippages are under control. The 15,600 odd crore mark is a good number. Secondly, we know that credit growth is unlikely to pick up any time soon. The number reflects that 5% to 6% range whereas the deposit growth continues to remain strong. SBI’s credit costs have come down and it looks like SBI has executed well, given the tough macro environment. The Covid related provisionings are largely within expectation and gives comfort that numbers for other banks will also hopefully be in line or better.

Would a long-term investor be willing to buy the stock at the current levels?
Absolutely. The stock at the current levels still trades only at about close to its book value around one time for the medium to longer term investor. For a franchise as strong and big as SBI, one in four or five loans in this country is made by SBI.

Today whether it is corporate banking, retail banking or the government borrowings from banks, SBI has executed well. So even without multiple re-rating, the stock can go much higher. At this current rate it will probably hit north of Rs 600 in less than about a year’s time from now.

What are your views on HDFC Ltd?
After long underperformance due to slowing loan growth etc, hopefully things will improve for HDFC if there is no third wave. Also coming out of the current lockdowns, home loan growth rates are picking up while other forms of borrowing or lending has still not picked up. That is reflected both in the volumes of real estate companies as well as by the housing finance companies. I think given its underperformance, HDFC being the market leader along with LIC Housing and Repco, could do well in the next couple of quarters



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Financial creditors’ insolvency plea valid even after three years, rules SC, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Supreme Court has ruled that plea by a financial creditor for initiation of insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the adjudicating authority will not get time barred on the ground that it had been filed beyond a period of three years from the date of declaration of the loan account as NPA.

A two-judge bench set aside an order of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) by which it had said that application under section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) for initiation of insolvency process was time barred.

The bench said, “To sum up, in our considered opinion an application under Section 7 of the IBC would not be barred by limitation, on the ground that it had been filed beyond a period of three years from the date of declaration of the loan account of the Corporate Debtor as NPA, if there were an acknowledgement of the debt by the Corporate Debtor before expiry of the period of limitation of three years, in which case the period of limitation would get extended by a further period of three years”.

It said that the impugned judgement and order of NCLAT is unsustainable in law and facts and allowed the appeal of Dena Bank.

The case

Dena Bank has moved the top court in appeal against December 18, 2019 order of NCLAT setting aside an order of March 21, 2019 passed by NCLT, Bengaluru admitting the application of the bank for initiation of insolvency proceedings against company Kaveri Telecom Infrastructure Limited and its director C Shivakumar Reddy.

By a letter dated December 23, 2011 the Bank had sanctioned term loan and Letter of Credit Cum Buyers’ Credit in favour of the company, with an upper limit of Rs 45 Crores.

The said term loan was to be repaid in 24 quarterly instalments of Rs 187.50 lakhs, which were to commence two years after the date of disbursement, and the entire term loan was to be repaid in eight years, inclusive of the implementation period of one year and the moratorium period.

On September 20, 2013 the corporate debtor defaulted in repayment of its dues to the bank and the loan account of the company was therefore declared Non Performing Asset (NPA) on December 31, 2013

The rationale

The bench said that there is no bar in law to the amendment of pleadings in an application under Section 7 of the IBC, or to the filing of additional documents, apart from those initially filed along with application under the provision of the IBC in Form-1.

“In the absence of any express provision which either prohibits or sets a time limit for filing of additional documents, it cannot be said that the adjudicating authority committed any illegality or error in permitting the appellant bank to file additional documents,” it said.

The top court, however, said that depending on the facts and circumstances of the case, when there is inordinate delay, the adjudicating authority might, at its discretion, decline the request of an applicant to file additional pleadings and/or documents, and proceed to pass a final order.

“In our considered view, the decision of the adjudicating authority to entertain and/or to allow the request of the appellant bank for the filing of additional documents with supporting pleadings, and to consider such documents and pleadings did not call for interference in appeal,” it said.

Fresh cause of action

The top court said that a judgment and/or decree for money in favour of the financial creditor, passed by the DRT, or any other Tribunal or Court, or the issuance of a Certificate of Recovery in favour of the financial creditor, would give rise to a fresh cause of action, to initiate proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, if the dues remain unpaid.

It said that in the instant case the balance sheets and financial statements of the Corporate Debtor for 2016-2017, constitute acknowledgement of liability which extended the limitation by three years, apart from the fact that a Certificate of Recovery was issued in favour of the appellant bank in May 2017.

It said that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru had rightly admitted the application of the bank by its order dated March 21, 2019.

Limitation Act

It said that there is no specific period of limitation prescribed in the Limitation Act, 1963, for an application under the IBC, before the NCLT but an application for which no period of limitation is provided anywhere else in the Schedule to the Limitation Act, is governed by Article 137 of the schedule of the said Act.

“There can be no dispute with the proposition that the period of limitation for making an application under Section 7 or 9 of the IBC is three years from the date of accrual of the right to sue, that is, the date of default,” it said.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Parliamentary panel that includes former PM Manmohan Singh wants IBC overhaul, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


A parliamentary standing committee led by former Union minister Jayant Sinha set up to examine the workings of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has recommended an overhaul of the present system including a threshold rate of haircut for creditors.

The 29 member committee includes former prime minister Manmohan Singh.

Low recovery rates with haircuts as much as 95% and 71% of the cases pending beyond the 180 days timeframe envisaged by the law point towards a deviation from the original objective of the Code.

“As the insolvency process has fairly matured now, there may be an imperative to have a benchmark for the quantum of “hair-cut”, comparable to global standards,” the committee said without specifying what this benchmark could be.

It noted that though the new code has helped in substantially improving credit culture, there are long delays in cases due to the time taken to admit cases, allowing bidders even after the deadline and various challenges to the NCLT judgements.

The committee also expressed apprehension about fresh graduates being appointed as resolution professionals (RPs) expressing doubts over their handling of large cases. It pointed out that regulatory action has been taken in 123 out of the 203 cases examined by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).

The panel’s suggestions

Only high court judges be appointed to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to ensure quicker disposal of cases.

Instead of having multiple insolvency professional agencies (IPAs) a single body may be formed to oversee and regulate RPs.

Bring a professional code of conduct for the committee of credtors (CoC) the main decision making body approving a resolution plan and also a set of guidelines for the appointment of RPs to ensure transparency in the CoC.

NCLT should accept defaulters within 30 days and transfer control to a resolution process within this time period.

IBC needs to be amended so that no post hoc bids are allowed during the resolution process.

Involving national law schools so that conduct research, training and also provide support in the form of law clerks.

It has suggested dedicated benches of the IBC within the NCLT and also special benches for micro and small enterprises for quicker disposal of cases.

RPs should also be allowed to sell company assets depending on the demand, in parts to multiple bidders rather than in a block to get maximum value.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Cochin Chamber of Commerce and Industry seeks review of RBI circular on current accounts

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Cochin Chamber of Commerce and Industry has requested the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for a review of its circular of August 2020 restricting the use of current accounts with banks other than those with whom loan facilities are granted.

As per the RBI’s directive, no bank can open or allow operation of current accounts for customers who have availed credit facilities in the form of cash credit/ overdrafts in any other bank.

K. Harikumar, the Chamber President said that the accounts have been closed by the banks unilaterally even in the case of borrowers who maintained current account with different branches of the same bank from where the cash credit/ overdraft facility was availed.

Also read: RBI gives banks 3 more months to comply with new rules on opening current accounts

It explained that the loan facility may be granted from a bigger branch while the companies operated current accounts with the same bank nearer to the factories, which could be in different locations.

These current accounts were used for disbursements to local purchases, wages, salary etc. to prevent the risk of carrying cash. These current accounts which are maintained in the same bank could be monitored and ensured that no diversion of funds takes place. The closure of these current accounts has put the companies in a very tight situation.

Similarly, small traders whose collections from sales are mostly in cash remit the proceeds in current accounts with smaller banks and later transfer the same to the bank where the overdraft facilities are availed.

They are forced to resort to maintaining current accounts since new generation banks and big public sector banks either refuse to accept cash or charge hefty fee as cash counting charges. These traders are also totally at a loss.

The chamber has requested the RBI to permit the usage of current accounts and also requests that a detailed dialogue be entered into with the chambers/ trade associations and ensure that genuine business is not put to difficulty on account of this circular.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

KM Birla steps down as non-exec chairman of Voda Idea, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Aditya Birla Group (ABG) chairman Kumar Mangalam Birla has resigned as the non-executive chairman and director of Vodafone Idea (Vi), intensifying the gloom over the cash-strapped telco which has been desperately trying to raise funds and seek government help to survive.

Birla is being replaced by Himanshu Kapania, currently a non-executive director and a former managing director of the erstwhile Idea Cellular before its merger with Vodafone India.

“The Board of Directors of Vodafone Idea Limited, at its meeting held today, have accepted the request of Mr. Kumar Mangalam Birla to step down as Non-Executive Director and Non-Executive Chairman of the Board with effect from close of business hours on 4th August, 2021,” the company said in a notice to stock exchanges on Wednesday.

UK’s Vodafone Group, the co-parent of Vi with a 44.39% stake, declined to comment.

Birla’s announcement – which came after market hours – comes less than two months after he wrote to the government, offering to hand over the group’s 27.66 % stake in Vi to any public sector or domestic financial entity who could keep the company afloat. He had also asserted that without immediate government support, the telco would be driven to an irretrievable point of collapse.

The Vodafone Group didn’t comment on Birla’s letter. But its CEO Nick Read on July 23 – over a month and a half after Birla’s June 7 letter – reiterated UK major’s stance that it won’t infuse any more equity in its Indian JV.

The government hasn’t responded to Birla’s letter. Officials though say that the Centre is preparing a relief package for the telecom sector, which would also benefit Vi. The package could include allowing surrender of spectrum, reduction of bank guarantees, phasing out or reducing levies such as licence fees and spectrum usage charges and prospectively redefine adjusted gross revenue (AGR) to exclude non-telecom items.

Vi’s stock crashed 20% to its 52-week low on Wednesday to Rs 5.94 before ending 18.5% down at Rs 6.03 as investors dumped the company, fearing it is headed for a default and bankruptcy, said market experts. The shares lost Rs 3,936.75 crore in value, a day after losing Rs2,443 crore when the scrip ended 10.3% lower. Contents of the letter were made public on Monday.

Market watchers said the planned relief package won’t address the immediate cash needs of the telco, which is staring at a potential $3.1 billion (Rs 23,500 crore) shortfall in cash flows in FY23, as per Kotak Securities. Vi’s cash balance at March end was Rs 350 crore and its efforts at raising Rs25,000 crore for the last 10 months hasn’t been successful so far.

Birla had taken over as non-executive chairman of Vodafone Idea in August 2018 upon the closure of a $23-billion merger between Idea Cellular and Vodafone India, the telecom unit of Vodafone Group. The merged entity became the country’s largest telco by revenue market share and subscriber share.

But since then, as the two companies worked to integrate the two large telcos, Vodafone Idea rapidly lost both revenue and subscriber market share to rivals Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel.

Its debt ballooned to Rs1.8 lakh crore in the January-March quarter as it borrowed to buy spectrum and invest in its network, at a time revenue was falling sharply, leading to dwindling cash flows and heavy losses. Vi has never reported a quarterly profit since the merger. Its net loss in the January-March quarter was Rs 6,985.1 crore.

The telco was pushed to the brink after the Supreme Court ruled in September 2019 to widen the definition of AGR to include non-telecom items and left Vi with a statutory bill of over Rs58,000 crore. It has paid Rs7854 crore so far, and all its attempts to reduce the AGR bill by legal means has come to nought.

In his letter, Birla said that over the last year, the telco has made all efforts to improve the operational efficiency of the company through prudent capital spending, manpower restructuring, and other cost cutting steps.

“Despite all that, the financial condition (particularly the liquidity position) of the company has sharply deteriorated,” he said.

Birla had also sought positive actions on long standing requests such as clarity on AGR liability, adequate moratorium on spectrum payments, and a floor price regime for investors to have confidence in the sector to invest in Vi. The letter predated last month’s Supreme Court order which dismissed the plea of Vodafone Idea and other telcos to permit rectification of ‘arithmetical errors’ in the computation of AGR dues.

He added that without backing from the government on the three major issues by July 2021, VIL’s financial situation will drive its operations to an “irretrievable point of collapse”.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Myanmar limits foreign hires in banks in troubled financial sector, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


BANGKOK – Myanmar is limiting the number of foreign staff allowed to work in domestic banks, a move that industry sources warn could further impede financial development in a country that had seen a boom in foreign investment before the military coup.

A letter dated Aug. 2 and posted on the central bank’s website said major banks can now employ no more than 25 foreign staff, 15 at a medium-sized bank and eight at small lenders.

In addition, a bank must obtain authorisation 30 days before hiring a foreign national and some senior posts must be held by local citizens, it said.

Military authorities replaced the central bank’s leadership after the Feb. 1 coup against the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi, which sparked almost daily protests and fighting between the army and newly formed people’s defence forces.

The country’s banking sector has already been battered by strikes amid a civil disobedience campaign to defy the military and there have regularly been huge queues at branches as residents try to withdraw cash.

Central bank deputy governor Win Thaw did not answer calls seeking comment on the decision.

Some other countries in Southeast Asia have placed limits on the number of foreign staff at banks to encourage local hiring, but the Myanmar central bank’s letter did not mention if that was its intention.

A senior manager at one of Myanmar’s biggest banks who asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue said there was still a crucial need for foreign expertise .

An executive at another Myanmar bank said limiting foreign staff meant the banking sector would become more isolated and could have less oversight.

Myanmar had enjoyed a flurry of foreign investment in sectors ranging from telecoms to consumer goods after an easing of western sanctions as the country appeared to be opening up and on a democratic path when Suu Kyi’s party won polls in 2015.

In the banking sector, foreign investors in recent years include Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC and Norway’s Norfund, which both have stakes in Myanmar’s Yoma Bank.

Yoma Bank, which is part of First Myanmar Investment, a sister company of Singapore-listed Myanmar-focused conglomerate Yoma Strategic Holdings, did not have an immediate comment on the central bank’s new rules.

Sanctions have stalled inflows of investment to Myanmar, and foreign companies doing business there face pressure from rights groups and Myanmar’s parallel civilian government to ensure payments do not flow to the military government.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Banks to discuss next course of action on Vodafone Idea, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Lenders to Vodafone Idea (VIL) are expected to hold talks to decide on the future course of action with regard to their exposure to the debt-laden telecom player which is struggling to stay afloat.

This comes in the wake of Aditya Birla Group chairman Kumar Mangalam Birla offering to hand over his stake in VIL to the government or any other entity so that the company remains functional.

Meanwhile, Birla on Wednesday stepped down as non-executive director and non-executive chairman of Vodafone Idea.

S S Mallikarjuna Rao, MD and CEO of Punjab National Bank, on Tuesday said the developments in the last few days were areas of concern for the banking industry, referring the AGR-related issues for the telecom players.

Rao, however, said PNB‘s exposure is not very high in VIL and it is not going to impact its balance sheet.

“However, we will be definitely discussing with other bankers to see what kind of action we need to take going forward considering the statement of K M Birla only yesterday,” Rao said, referring to the billionaire businessman’s offer to hand over his stake in VIL to the government or any other entity.

The Supreme Court has dismissed applications by telcos for recalculation of AGR-related dues.

According to official data, VIL had an adjusted gross revenue (AGR) liability of Rs 58,254 crore, out of which the company has paid Rs 7,854.37 crore and Rs 50,399.63 crore is outstanding.

The apex court, in an order passed in September last year, had asked the telecom players to settle their AGR related dues worth Rs 93,520 crore towards the government over a period of 10 years.

VIL’s gross debt, excluding lease liabilities, stood at Rs 1,80,310 crore as of March 31, 2021.

IDFC First Bank has marked the account of VIL as stressed and has made provisions of 15 per cent (Rs 487 crore) against the outstanding exposure of Rs 3,244 crore (funded and non-funded).

“This provision translates to 24 per cent of the funded exposure on this account. The said account is current and has no overdues as of June 30, 2021,” the lender said in its Q1FY22 investor presentation, referring to the account as “one large telecom account”.

Writing a letter to Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba in June, Birla, who holds around 27 per cent stake in VIL, said investors are not willing to invest in the company in the absence of clarity on AGR liability, adequate moratorium on spectrum payments and most importantly floor pricing regime being above the cost of service.

“It is with a sense of duty towards the 27 crore Indians connected by VIL, I am more than willing to hand over my stake in the company to any entity- public sector/government /domestic financial entity or any other that the government may consider worthy of keeping the company as a going concern,” Birla said in the letter.

Among the other players, the AGR liability of Bharti Airtel is Rs 43,980 crore, Tata group Rs 16,798 crore, BSNL Rs 5,835.85 crore and MTNL Rs 4,352.09 crore.

Bharti Airtel has paid the government Rs 18,004 crore, Tatas Rs 4,197 crore and Reliance Jio has cleared its entire dues of Rs 194.79 crore.

Anil Ambani-owned Reliance Communications owes Rs 25,194.58 crore, Aircel Rs 12,389 crore and Videocon Telecommunications Rs 1,376 crore. However, these companies are under liquidation process.

Companies like Loop Telecom, Etisalat DB and S Tel, which jointly owe the government Rs 604 crore, have shut down their India operations.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

ANZ Bank’s Mathur, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, Shaktikanta Das, said last year that the Covid-19 crisis is the sort of event that occurs once every 100 years. Policymakers from North Block to Mint Street have been attempting to find an adequate response to a crisis of this magnitude.

The Chief Economist, South East Asia and India at ANZ Bank, has a contrarian view.

In a chat with ETMarkets.com, Sanjay Mathur, a veteran economist, said the need of the hour is not capital spending that generates long-term gains. “Rather, what is important now and for years to come, is to lift people out of poverty, as that would have a larger impact on the economy,” he said.

“Let me take a controversial stand here. Our thinking on the fiscal has become somewhat stereotyped – capital spending is good and revenue spending is bad. And for FY22, the focus has been on capital spending. But the nature of the current crisis is different: it is a humanitarian crisis that calls for more massive welfare measures. A large section of our population has slipped into poverty, income and wealth disparities are rising,” Mathur said.

The government and RBI have unveiled various spending schemes since the pandemic struck last year; the flagship programme being the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ scheme, which essentially prioritises import substitution.

However, out of the Rs 20 lakh crore announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the actual fiscal outgo is very small. A bulk of the programmes are reflective of RBI’s liquidity infusion in the banking system, while the rest are mostly credit guarantees.

One cannot exactly blame the government, as its finances have been under strain since well before the pandemic.

In the last Budget, the government put aside the prescriptions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act and announced a fiscal deficit of 6.8 per cent of GDP for this financial year. The Centre had earlier set a target of 3.0 per cent fiscal deficit by 2017-18 (Apr-Mar).

However, it will not be accurate to say that the entire strain was on account of the pandemic. A year before Covid-19 wreaked havoc on the economy, the government had already skipped the targets it had set for itself under the FRBM Act, as tax collections fell short of targets.

Mathur said the government and the central bank together have done what they could within their constraints. “There was very little fiscal headroom to start with,” he said.

“So while I do acknowledge that asset creation has a larger multiplier on growth, this crisis is also unique and requires a different response,” he added.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Lookout notice in bank fraud case, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Thrissur: Crime branch team probing the scam in Karuvannur Cooperative Bank has initiated steps to issue lookout notices against six accused in the case. According to the crime branch sources the requests for issuing the lookout notices have been submitted to emigration authorities so that the accused can be prevented from going abroad. There are reports that one of the accused has already gone abroad.

The crime branch team has started collecting the details of the assets of the accused in the fraud. According to preliminary estimates the bank has incurred a loss of over Rs 100 crore in the scam. Authorities said the properties of the accused would be auctioned to recover part of the lost amount.

Three of the accused have filed their anticipatory bail applications at the principal district and sessions court.

M Biju Kareem, the bank manager and C K Jilse, the accountant, and Reji Anilkumar, an employee at a supermarket run by the bank, had filed their bail applications soon after the fraud was exposed last month.

The bail application came up for hearing on July 21 and the prosecution has been asked to file its response. The petition is likely to come up for hearing on August 6.

The probe team has been facing criticisms from Congress and BJP over the delay in the arrest of the accused.

They have been alleging that the probe team has been trying to protect the fraudsters because of their links with CPM.

The investigators have refuted the allegations, saying that they have been making all efforts to book the accused.

Can cops be faulted for pursuing accused: Court

The high court on Wednesday asked whether police can be faulted for pursuing the accused in the bank fraud case.

Justice K Haripal made the statement while considering an anticipatory bail plea filed by TR Sunil Kumar, secretary of Karuvannur bank and the first accused in the case. He had contended that he did not have a significant role in allowing loans and that his custodial interrogation is not required.

During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel submitted that the pre-arrest bail plea should be heard as early as possible as the applicant has been made an accused and police have following him around. The court asked how can the police be faulted for following an accused.

The applicant had contended that he was removed from the loan-sanctioning section on December 5, 2019 after department of cooperation began an enquiry into some alleged irregularities at the bank.

As the secretary, he has very limited role in sanctioning loans and it is the governing body that considers the applications and sanction loans, the petition said. It is due to the lapses on the part of the governing body that a probe was required and the banks employees have no part in it, the applicant said. The court will hear the case in detail on August 9.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 217 218 219 220 221 540