What role do anchor investors play in an IPO

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Two colleagues sharing a cab ride to office have money conversations.

Aruna: Markets are doing well. I wish I could make some extra money from it.

Sarika: Yes, same here. IPOs are quite the money-spinners today I hear.

Aruna: Yeah, more than half a dozen IPOs in August alone. My broker says to look at anchor investor book before applying.

Sarika: Who are anchor investors? Promoters?

Aruna: No. Anchor investors are institutional investors who are offered shares a day before the IPO opens.

Sarika: If some are buying shares ahead of IPO, are they not cutting our chances?

Aruna: Haha. Actually, anchor investments are a useful guide to other investors. They indicate whether there is demand for IPO offered.

Sarika: Do anchor investors get any discount?

Aruna: No. They are supposed to ‘anchor’ the issue by agreeing to subscribe to shares at a fixed price. Anchor investors can bid for shares at any price within the IPO price band.

Sarika: Then, how is this important? To me it seems just another share-sale!

Aruna: In a bull market, everything seems simple. But actually anchor investors are quite important for small investors. Unlike brokerages who simply put out IPO reports, anchor investors have skin in the game. Typically, they are mutual funds, insurance companies and foreign funds. They would have done better research.

Sarika: So, if the public issue has any problem, will the anchor investors give it a tepid response?

Aruna: Yes, Sari. There have been instances of some IPOs failing to mop up money from anchor investors, or anchor investors bidding at the lower end of the IPO price band.

Sarika: Oh, there is some method to the madness then! I was thinking they are like IPO brand ambassadors.

Aruna: Obviously there is a lot of at stake. Its real money that anchor investors put in and they can’t sell their shares for at least 30 days after the allotment. So, they have to be doubly sure.

Sarika: Where do I get anchor investor information?

Aruna: Anchor investor details are published in BSE Notices and NSE Circulars a day before the IPO opens for the public. The communique will mention shares allotted to each anchor investor, percentage of anchor investor portion allotted, value of shares allotted and so on.

Sarika: Interesting. In comparison to all the grey market premium (GMP) talk on upcoming IPOs, I suppose the anchor investor activity is a far better signal.

Aruna: Definitely. And we have reached office. Time to drop anchor here!

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Amid asset quality woes, FPIs pull out nearly ₹11,000 crore from financials in July

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) have pulled out close to ₹11,000 crore from the financial services sector stocks in July amid concerns over the spike in fresh slippages and asset quality deterioration from the key sector constituents — banks and NBFCs.

According to NSDL data, FPIs pulled out ₹10,767 crore from the financial services sector in July. Of the same, ₹7,341 crore was pulled out from banks while the remaining ₹3,426 crore outflow was from ‘Other financial services’ which includes NBFCs and financial institutions (FIs). The outflow from the financial sector accounts for 95 per cent of the overall FPI outflow during the month across 35 sectors.

“The banking index has been underperforming on concerns of asset quality deterioration. The 6-month Nifty Bank return is only 0.43 per cent while the 6-month Nifty return is 8.8 per cent This under-performance has been largely due to the poor performance of HDFC Bank and Kotak Bank. These two were FIIs’ favourites,” said VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Financial Services.

Almost all private and public sector banks have posted good results in the first quarter in terms of earnings, profitability and business growth. However, fresh slippages and elevated levels of non-performing assets still remain a concern for the investors. Take State Bank of India for instance. The country’s largest lender posted its highest ever quarterly net profit at ₹6,504 crore in Q1FY22. However, fresh slippages during the quarter went up to ₹15,666 crore (from ₹3,637 crore in the year-ago quarter). Although, the bank said it was able to claw back Q1 slippages to the tune of ₹4,700 crore in July.

Covid impact

Similarly, major private sector banks including HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, Axis Bank have all witnessed deterioration in their asset quality in the first quarter due to the impact of the second wave of pandemic.

In its recent report on largest private sector lender HDFC Bank, Emkay Global said, “The bank has managed the first Covid wave well, but the GNPA ratio shot up to a decadal-high of 1.5 per cent in Q1, reflecting accumulated Covid-induced stress in the retail portfolio and the impact of the health scare on collection teams’ mobility.”

The RBI also, in its Financial Stability Report (FSR), said macro stress tests indicate that the gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio of scheduled commercial banks may increase from 7.48 per cent in March 2021 to 9.80 per cent by March 2022 under the baseline scenario; and to 11.22 per cent under a severe stress scenario.

Portfolio rejig

Market experts also attribute the FPI outflow from the financial services stocks to the sector’s underperformance and portfolio rejig efforts by the foreign investors.

Motilal Oswal Financial Services’ recent analysis on institutional ownership in Nifty-500 and Nifty-50 companies highlighted that in the Nifty-500 universe, FIIs have the highest ownership in private banks (48 per cent) followed by NBFCs (31.5 per cent), Oil & Gas (22.5 per cent), Insurance (21.6 per cent) among others.

“Financials has had a dominant run over the past few years. However, BFSI’s (private banks, NBFCs, insurance, and PSU banks) underperformance has continued to reflect in the FII allocation – down to 38 per cent in the Nifty-500 as of June, from 45.1 per cent in December 2019 and 40 per cent in March 2020. This has resulted in the trimming of weight by 130 bps q-o-q (quarter-on-quarter),” it added.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

DCB Bank Q1 net falls 57.5% to ₹34 cr

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


DCB Bank reported a 57.5 per cent drop in its standalone net profit in the first quarter of the fiscal as provisions surged.

The private sector lender had a net profit of ₹33.76 crore for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 against ₹79.38 crore in the corresponding period last fiscal.

Total income was up by 1.6 per cent to ₹965.67 crore in the first quarter of the fiscal from ₹950.7 crore a year ago.

Net interest income saw marginal growth of 0.6 per cent on a year-on-year basis to ₹308.7 crore in the quarter ended June 30, 2021 from ₹306.73 crore a year ago.

Provisions surged by 85.9 per cent to ₹155.54 crore in the April to June 2021 quarter as against ₹ 83.69 crore in the first quarter of last fiscal.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2021, the bank holds contingency provision of ₹107.53 crore towards further likely impact of Covid-19 on standard restructured and stressed assets.

Asset quality deteriorated

Gross non-performing assets rose to 4.87 per cent of gross advances as on June 30, 2021 versus 2.44 per cent a year ago. Net NPAs also increased to 2.82 per cent of net advances as on June 30, 2021 compared to 0.99 per cent a year ago.

During the quarter, the bank sold certain non-performing loans of net book value of ₹43.99 crore to an asset reconstruction company for consideration of ₹38.77 crore.

The bank has implemented resolution plans for Covid-19 related stress under Reserve Bank of India’s August 6, 2020 circular for 2,149 accounts.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

How a small change in date can impact interest income

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


If you are grappling with low interest rates on fixed income products, you may want to do every little bit to enhance your interest income. For that, it is important to understand how interest income is calculated.

The date on which deposits and withdrawals are made in a month can have an impact on the interest income you earn. Here we talk about the interest calculation for a few fixed income instruments – Public Provident Fund (PPF), Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana (SSY), Post Office Savings Account (POSA) and Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF).

Post Office Schemes

PPF and SSY are two long-term saving products from the Post Office offering attractive interest rates today.

Both the accounts require minimum amount to be deposited every financial year (₹500 for PPF and ₹250 for SSY) to keep them active.

Under these accounts, the interest amount gets credited at the end of the financial year and compounding of interest happens annually. However, the interest is calculated for each calendar month on the lowest balance in an account between the close of the fifth day and the end of the month.

Say, the balance in your PPF/SSY account as on July 2021 end is ₹2 lakh and you plan to deposit ₹10,000 in August. If the deposit is made on August 6, the interest for the month of August will be calculated on ₹2 lakh only. The deposit amount of ₹10,000 will be considered for interest calculation only from the month of September 2021. If you slightly tweak the deposit date to some time before August 5, you can earn a slightly higher interest income on PPF/SSY. This may translate to a reasonably good amount over time due to the compounding effect.

The Post Office Savings Account (POSA) too comes with similar conditions. The interest, here too, is credited at the end of each financial year, but the lowest balance between the tenth and the last day of the month is considered.

Rules for POSA also state that on withdrawal of the entire balance interest on the corpus will be calculated up to the last day of the month preceding the month in which the account is closed. Thus, one can plan the withdrawals from POSA at the beginning of a month as you would have maximised the interest earnings at the end of the previous month.

Employees’ Provident Fund

If you are a salaried , both the employee and the employer together contribute 24 per cent of the basic salary plus dearness allowance on a monthly basis towards EPF.

On all the contributions made, interest is calculated from the first day of the month (succeeding the month of credit) to the end of that fiscal year.

For example, if, say, the EPF contribution for April 2021 is made by your employer to the EPFO towards the end of the April itself, then this contribution will earn interest for eleven months in the fiscal FY22 (May 2021 to March 2022). But say, the employer deposits the amount in the beginning of May 2021, then interest will be calculated only for ten months, that is, from June 2021 to March 2022.

Though credits to the PF account are not in your control, understand that your employer transferring the monthly PF contribution at the end of that relevant month is beneficial over transfer at the beginning of the next month.

On the other hand, in case of withdrawals, interest is calculated on the withdrawn amount up to the last day of the month preceding the month of withdrawal.

On maturity

You can consider continuing your investments in fixed-income products such as PPF/SSY and EPF account even after the contributions come to an end. This is because the interest rates offered by EPF (8.5 per cent for FY20), PPF (7.1 per cent now) and SSY (7.6 per cent now) have so far been attractive compared to other products considering the risk-return metrics.

When the subscriber retires after 55, interest will continue to be credited to the PF account until three years from the time fresh contribution to the account are stopped. Even when the EPF account becomes dormant (with no fresh contributions) before retirement age of 55, the account continues to be operative and interest will be paid until the subscriber turns 58, in most cases. In case of PPF/SSY, the account holder may retain his account after the minimum contributory period of 15 years, without making any further deposits upto 21 years from account opening in case of SSY or any period in blocks of five year in case of PPF and the balance in the account will continue to earn interest at the rate applicable to the scheme.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of Baroda back in black; logs ₹1,209-crore profit in Q1

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bank of Baroda (BoB) is back in the black in the first quarter of FY22, reporting a standalone net profit of ₹1,209 crore on the back of robust growth in other income and decline in provisions towards bad loans and standard assets.

The public sector bank had reported a net loss in both the year ago quarter (₹864 crore) and the preceding/ Q4FY21 quarter (₹1,046 crore). NIM improvesNet interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) was up 16 per cent year-on-year at ₹7,892 crore (₹6,816 crore in the year ago quarter).

Other income, comprising commission, exchange & brokerage, treasury income and recoveries in written-off accounts, jumped 63 per cent yoy to Rs 2,970 crore (Rs 1,818 crore).

Sanjiv Chadha, MD & CEO, said “The operating profit has shown a very sharp uptick, moving up nearly 41 per cent (to ₹5,707 crore). With the provisioning also contained, the net profit moved up to more than ₹1,200 crore.”

“.…The asset quality has been fairly resilient, with sequential lowering of gross NPAs as well as net NPAs by a tad. The improvement in the corporate credit cycle should benefit the bank as we forward.”

Global net interest margin improved to 3.04 per cent in the Apri-June quarter against 2.52 per cent in the year ago period.

Provisions, including towards bad loans and standard assets, declined 23 per cent yoy to ₹4,112 crore (₹5,349 crore).

The Bank made additional provision of ₹373 crore during the quarter ended June 30, in compliance with RBI’s June 7, 2019, circular on “Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets issued guidelines for implementation of Resolution Plan”.

Slippages were lower at ₹5,129 crore in the reporting quarter against ₹11,655 crore in the preceding quarter. The slippages came mainly from MSME (42.5 per cent of the slippages), retail (24 per cent),and agriculture (21 per cent).NPAs declineGross non-performing assets (GNPAs) declined by ₹3,642 crore during the reporting quarter to stand at ₹63,029 crore as at June-end 2021. The Bank recovered ₹530 crore from the defunct Kingfisher Airlines account.

Gross NPA position improved a tad to 8.86 per cent of gross advances as at June-end 2021 against 8.87 per cent as at March-end 2021.

Net NPA position too improved to 3.03 per cent of net advances as at June-end 2021 against 3.09 per cent as at March-end 2021.

Global deposits declined a shade (0.34 per cent yoy) to ₹9,31,317 crore. However, the proportion of low-cost current account, savings account (CASA) increased to 43.21 per cent of domestic deposits against 39.49 per cent in the year ago quarter.

Global gross advances were down 3.40 per cent yoy to ₹7,11,487 crore, with retail advances growing about 12 per cent, agriculture about 9 per cent and MSME about 7 per cent. However, corporate advances contracted about 12 per cent yoy.

Bank of Baroda (BoB) is back in the black in the first quarter of FY22, reporting a standalone net profit of ₹1,209 crore on the back of robust growth in other income and decline in provisions for bad loans.

The public sector bank had reported a net loss in both the year ago quarter (₹864 crore) and March quarter (₹1,046.50 crore).

Net interest income (difference between interest earned and interest expended) was up 16 per cent year-on-year at ₹7,892 crore (₹6,816 crore in the year-ago quarter).

Other income, comprising commission, exchange & brokerage, treasury income and recoveries in written-off accounts, jumped 63 per cent yoy to ₹2,970 crore (₹1,818 crore).

Provisions, including towards bad loans, declined 23 per cent yoy to ₹4,112 crore (₹5,349 crore).

Additional provision

The bank said it has made additional provision of ₹373 crore in June quarter in compliance with RBI’s June 7, 2019 circular on “Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets issued guidelines for implementation of Resolution Plan”.

Gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) declined by ₹3,642 crore during the reporting quarter to ₹ 63,029 crore as of June-end.

Gross NPA position improved a tad to 8.86 per cent of gross advances as at June-end 2021 against 8.87 per cent as at March-end 2021.

Net NPA

Net NPA position too improved to 3.03 per cent of net advances as at June-end 2021 against 3.09 per cent as at March-end 2021.

The number of borrower accounts where modification (restructuring) were sanctioned as per RBI’s circular (May 5, 2021) circular on “Resolution Framework – 2.0: Resolution of Covid-19 related stress of individuals and small business” was sanctioned and implemented stood at 8,544 and the aggregate exposure to such borrowers was ₹665 crore.

The bank has purchased PSLC (Priority Sector lending Certificates) of ₹3,500 crore under the category of Small and Marginal Farmer and sold PSLC of ₹1,000 crore under the category Micro Enterprises during the current quarter.

Deposits declined a tad (0.34 per cent yoy) to ₹9,31,317 crore. Advances were down 2.66 per cent yoy to ₹6,68,382 crore.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Sitharaman lays foundation stone for Khadi workers’ shed in Andhra village, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Ponduru, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Saturday laid the foundation stone for a mass shed for Khadi workers at Ponduru village in Andhra Pradesh’s Srikakulam district.

She also handed over a cheque for Rs 18 lakh to the Andhra Fine Khadi Karimikabhivrudhi (AFKK) Sangham, Ponduru, said a statement issued by her office.

Sitharaman handed over the contract document for the new building to the khadi workers association coinciding with the National Handloom Day.

The Finance Minister is on a two-day visit to the southern state and attended a programme organized by AFKK.

During her visit, Sitharaman garlanded a statue of Mahatma Gandhi.

Ponduru’s location has an interesting connection with Gandhi, considering his halt at Dusi railway station which is just 10 km away from the village during his Dandi March as part of India’s freedom struggle.

“On his Dandi March, Gandhiji had stopped at Dusi railway station, just 10 km away from Ponduru, to inspect the khadi work done there, which is renowned across the country,” said the statement.

Mahatma Gandhi also sent his son Devdas to the village to study khadi work.

“After staying for a week, he conveyed to Gandhiji how the women in the region spun on the single spindle chakra, a tradition that is still being followed in the area, one of the few areas to do so,” said the statement.

Meanwhile, multiple delegations, including Crafts Council of Andhra Pradesh, Laghu Udyog Bharti, Federation of Andhra Pradesh State Weavers Association and General Insurance Pensioners Association called on Sitharaman.

Bharatiya Janata Party Rajya Sabha MP G.V.L. Narasimha Rao and state Finance Minister Buggana Rajendranath Reddy were also present with her.

Federal Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman was speaking to reporters after the meeting with the Goods and Services Tax Council, which she chairs and includes all state finance ministers of the country.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Shaktikanta Das, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India‘s (RBI) reduction in benchmark interest rates which started before the outbreak of the Covid 19 pandemic in March 2020 has substantially reduced bank lending rates, reducing borrowing costs for both companies as well as individuals, governor Shaktikanta Das said.

“The reduction in repo rate by 250 basis points since February 2019 has resulted in a cumulative decline by 217 basis points in the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on fresh rupee loans. Domestic borrowing costs have eased, including interest rates on market instruments like corporates bonds, debentures, CPs, CDs and T-bills,” Das said. One basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

Das said the improvement in transmission of rates has proven the “efficacy” of RBI’s monetary policy measures in the current easing cycle and has reduced the debt burden on both companies as well as households.

“In the credit market, transmission to lending rates has been stronger for MSMEs, housing and large industries. The low interest rate regime has also helped the household sector reduce the burden of loan servicing. The significant reduction in interest rates on personal housing loans and loans to commercial real estate sector augurs well for the economy, as these sectors have extensive backward and forward linkages and are employment intensive,” Das said.

Replying to a question in the post policy press conference, Das said the transmission of policy rates has not only been for new loans but also existing borrowers. “With regards to outstanding rupee loans the transmisson is 117 basis points. In outstanding loans there is a cycle of loan reset so naturally it has to be done when the due date arises. In the pandemic period starting from March 2020 to July 2021, the transmission on fresh rupee loans has been 146 basis points whereas for outstanding loans it has been 101 basis points, so transmisson has happened on outstanding loans also,” Das said.

On Friday, the Reserve Bank of India maintained status quo on interest rates as expected and assured it would do whatever it takes to get the economy back on a firm footing despite rising inflation. Repo rate, the rate at which it lends to banks was kept unchanged at 4% even as monetary policy committee raised inflation forecasts for the fiscal year by nearly 60 basis points to 5.7% citing high retail prices of petrol and diesel, and soaring prices of industrial raw materials.

Das also reiterated the RBI’s commitment to help the central and state government ensure an orderly completion of their borrowing programmes at a reasonable cost while minimising rollover risk.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Risks & Regulatory Imperatives, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In today’s age of the Internet, fiat and account-based electronic money are in a state of flux. A decade after Bitcoin was introduced to the world by Satoshi Nakamoto, token-based digital currencies have proliferated to include a wide variety of private cryptocurrencies, central bank digital currencies and stablecoins. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are a direct liability of the central banks. Stablecoins, on the other hand, are fiat collateralised (linked to fiat currencies such as the US dollar or euro.) or collateralised as per the value of the underlying asset or reserve.

Regulators across the globe are concerned about the unprecedented growth of tokenized money, stablecoins in particular, and its potential to disintermediate incumbent financial institutions , create volatility and financial stability risks.

Let’s Decrypt Stablecoins
Are the concerns over stablecoins legitimate? Let’s understand this token and its various types in detail to make an informed opinion.

So, what are stablecoins? Unlike Bitcoin and other popular cryptocurrencies, known for wild volatility, stablecoins are blockchain-based cryptocurrencies backed by safe reserves.

But, are stablecoins really stable?

Let’s have a look at different types of stablecoins classified solely on the basis of the value that underpins them.

Types of Stablecoins
● Fiat-collateralized stablecoins: These stablecoins are collateralized by fiat money, such as US dollar, euro or the pound, on a 1:1 ratio. Common examples are Tether (2014), Gemini Dollar(2018) and TrueSD.

● Stablecoins backed by other asset classes: There are a few stablecoins, which are backed by a basket of multiple assets (commercial papers, bonds, real estate, precious metals, etc). The value of these stablecoins can fluctuate over time subject to movement in commodity and precious metal prices. Digix Gold, backed by

physical gold, was introduced in 2018. SwissRealCoin, launched in 2018, had a Swiss real estate portfolio.

● Crypto-collateralized stablecoins: Crypto-collateralized stablecoins are more decentralised than their peers and are backed by cryptocurrencies. The flipside is price volatility. To address the risk of price volatility, these stablecoins are over-collateralised. Dai (launched in 2017) is the most popular crypto-collateralized stablecoin.

● Non-collateralized stablecoins: These stablecoins do not have any backing and are decentralized in the true sense. The supply of non-collateralized stablecoins is governed by algorithms. Basis, introduced in 2018, is the most common stablecoin in this category.

Risks from Stablecoins
Tether, arguably the largest stablecoin issuer, disclosed in March that it held over 75% of its reserves in cash and cash equivalents, most of which are in the form of commercial paper. The remaining assets include loans to unaffiliated entities (12.55%), corporate bonds, funds & precious metals (9.96%), and additional investments which include Bitcoin and other digital tokens (1.64%).

The commercial paper holdings of Tether outnumbered leading money market funds (MMF) in the US and Europe.

In the event of a mass selloff of Tether coins along with other stablecoins, short-term credit markets will have to bear the brunt. In June this year, the crash of Iron, an algorithmic stablecoin, gave us a glimpse of the risk they run. That made Mark Cuban, an America’s billionaire entrepreneur and a victim of Iron collapse, to raise his voice for regulating stablecoins.

Fitch Ratings has rightly cautioned that potential asset contagion risks linked to the liquidation of stablecoin reserve holdings could increase pressure for tighter regulation of the nascent sector.

Clarion Call for Regulation
US Secretary of the Treasury Janet L Yellen has underscored the need to act quickly to ensure there is an appropriate US regulatory framework in place.

“You wouldn’t need stablecoins; you wouldn’t need cryptocurrencies, if you had a digital US currency,” US Fed Chairman Jerome Powell told a Congressional hearing this July.

He made it clear that the Fed is done letting stablecoins run amok. “We have a tradition in this country where the public’s money is held in what is supposed to be a very safe asset,” Powell said. “That doesn’t exist for stablecoins, and if they’re going to be a significant part of the payments universe… then we need an appropriate framework, which frankly we don’t have.”

Last year, European Commission came out with a regulatory framework proposal for crypto assets and stablecoins. The Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system, has highlighted the potential of global stablecoins (GSCs). FSB says, “A widely-adopted stablecoin with a potential reach and use across multiple jurisdictions (so-called ‘global stablecoins’ or GSCs) could become systemically important in and across one or many jurisdictions, including as a means of making payments.

But those who back stablecoins say with the established use cases in cross-border payments, settlements and financial inclusion, a global regulatory framework is all that is needed to harness the full potential of stablecoins.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Policy action of the central bank has to be nuanced: Das

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The six-member Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) decided to keep the policy repo rate unchanged as the economic recovery remains uneven across sectors, and the inflation process is being driven by exogenous and largely temporary supply shocks. The policy repo rate was last cut in May 2020 from 4.40 per cent to 4 per cent. The RBI top brass, including Governor Shaktikanta Das and four Deputy Governors – MK Jain, MD Patra, M Rajeshwar Rao and T Rabi Sankar – interacted with the media on the decisions taken by the MPC and additional measures announced by the RBI.

How do we read the mixed signals from the policy?

Das: These are extraordinary times. This is an extraordinary situation we are dealing with. And there are several currents and cross-currents. There are many conflicting objectives which the RBI has to manage. A central bank at any point of time is required to manage conflicting requirements of the economy, and more so in times like this.…The policy action of the RBI has to be nuanced. It cannot be unidirectional. It cannot be just black and white. It has to be a nuanced policy response. And that is precisely what we have attempted to do.

Is it fair to call inflation transitory?

Patra: On the inflation front, I think, if we all kind of step back a little bit and look at it in a historical perspective, things will get a little more clearer. For instance, between 2016 to 2020, we kept inflation at 4 per cent through a combination of various measures. In FY21, we were hit by the pandemic and it was an extraordinary situation in which margins and taxes were raised, and there were supply disruptions. So, inflation went up to 6.2 per cent on an average. Now, we are looking at an average of 5.7 per cent, which, I would say, from a historical perspective, is an improvement over the previous year.

So, the path of inflation is being calibrated downwards on the way to reach 4 per cent. So, from 6.20 per cent in a pandemic year to 5.7 per cent in the year following the pandemic and thereafter 4 per cent, is the right way to go….what we are doing is spreading disinflation over a period of two-three years so that the losses of output are minimised…

Do you have a timetable for introducing the central bank digital currency?

Rabi Sankar: We are evaluating the scope, the technology, the distribution mechanism, etc.… So, it will be difficult to pin a date on it. We should be able to come out with a model in the near future, probably by the end of this year.

What is your approach to dealing with inflation?

Patra: The approach to inflation is not one of a cold turkey approach, where you slam the economy till it goes limp without inflation. No, that is not the way it is. The flexible targeting framework allows you to secure disinflation over a period of time rather than a point of time.

And that has been our approach. Since inflation has gone to a pandemic high of 6-plus per cent, not a demand-supply high, it is important to bring that down, not immediately but over a period of time. And that is what the MPC is striving to do – to set a glide path for inflation that will eventually bring it back to target to the extent that there are factors that will definitely go away like we are already seeing prices of pulses and edible oil declining. Cereals prices going into deflation.

So, all these will now work into inflation to steady that process rather than have a jerky inflation.

Do you plan to bring in further changes in the opening of current account by borrowers?

Rao: As far as the current account issue is concerned, let me reiterate that there is no blanket ban on opening of these accounts. In fact, we are following a kind of graded approach – there are no restrictions on opening of current accounts if the exposure of the borrowers is less than ₹5 crore and if they have not availed of CC/OD facilities from any bank; and if the exposure is between ₹5 crore to ₹50 crore, there are no restrictions on opening of current accounts by such borrowers, but these accounts can only be used for collection purposes.

As far as CC/OD is concerned, technology today enables anywhere, anytime banking, so there is no likelihood of any disruption as far as opening of current accounts is concerned. And the proposal which we have actually tried to implement ensures better discipline on the borrowers.

And now taking into consideration some of the concerns expressed by the banks, we have actually extended the timeline till October 31 (for implementing the circular). And, we will be addressing many of these issues in consultation with the IBA and Banks so that any residual issues can be sorted out.

Banks are lending big time to the retail and MSME segment (due to ECLGS), but slippages and restructuring are also happening simultaneously. Is the RBI worried about this development?

Jain: With regard to any kind of stress in retail and MSME segment, we are closely monitoring. There is visibility of little bit stress from the past data, but it is not alarming. We are constantly engaged with the regulated entities, particularly the outlier banks and NBFCs, and we also conduct stress tests. In the past also…we advised all regulated entities to improve their provisions and they responded. The results of all these banks, if you see pre-Covid-2020 and now March 2021, there is an overall improvement in all parameters, including CAR, reduction in gross and net NPAs and slippages ratio. There is an improvement in PCR and improvement in profitability. So, the sector is better positioned today than what it was before the onset of Covid.

On private virtual currencies, I have said it previously also that the RBI has major concerns, and we have conveyed it to the government. The matter is with the government and it will take the matter forward.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI extends on-tap TLTRO scheme till December 31

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has extended the on-tap targeted Long Term Repo Operations (TLTROs) scheme by three months till December 31.

This is in view of the nascent and fragile economic recovery.

The RBI had, on October 9, 2020, first announced that it would conduct on tap TLTRO with tenors of up to three years for a total amount of up to ₹1-lakh crore at a floating rate linked to the policy repo rate. The scheme was available up to March 31, 2021. But it was later extended.

Liquidity availed by banks under the scheme has to be deployed in corporate bonds, commercial papers, and non-convertible debentures issued by the entities in five specific sectors. This scheme was further extended to stressed sectors identified by the Kamath Committee in December 2020 and bank lending to NBFCs in February 2021.

The liquidity availed under the scheme can also be used to extend bank loans and advances to these sectors.

Investments made by banks under this facility is classified as held to maturity (HTM), even in excess of 25 per cent of total investment permitted to be included in the HTM portfolio.

All exposures under this facility will also be exempted from reckoning under the large exposure framework (LEF).

As per RBI data, under on-tap TLTRO, banks had availed ₹5,000 crore on March 22, 2021, and ₹320 crore on June 14, 2021.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 487 488 489 490 491 16,278