Court rejects bail plea of Ambience group’s promoter in Rs 800-crore fraud case, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday dismissed the bail plea of businessman Raj Singh Gehlot, the owner of Ambience Mall who was arrested in a money laundering case related to Rs 800 crore bank loan alleged fraud case.

The Enforcement Directorate arrested Gehlot in July, in an alleged bank loan fraud case worth more than Rs 800 crore. He was arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for committing bank fraud against the Jammu and Kashmir Bank Consortium.

Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana dismissed the bail plea and said, “considering the nature of allegations, intricate nature of the investigation and the possibility of the applicant/accused attempting to influence the course of the investigation, I am of the considered opinion that the instant bail application is bereft of any merits and the same is accordingly dismissed.”

“…the economic offences are required to be treated as a separate class and bail cannot be granted as a matter of routine…”, Court said.

Earlier, Court while granting custody to ED said, “Investigation of an offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, (PMLA) in itself is an intricate exercise of skills and patience. The very nature of the offence requires sustained interrogation and an intensive analysis of the copious material collected during the course of the investigation. Considering its intricate nature, Investigation under PMLA, for obvious reasons, is a time-consuming process.”

Enforcement Directorates through Advocate Atul Sharma and Advocate Naveen Kumar Matta submitted that his custodial interrogation was required to unearth the end-use of some portion of loan funds in order to ascertain the exact quantum of proceeds of crime for determining the role of various other persons and aides who have assisted in the sanction and diversion of loan funds and also to unearth the entire modus operandi involved in the present case.

Senior Advocate Vikas Pahwa appearing for Gehlot forcefully argued that the relevant information about the transactions concerning the loan and its utilization has been mischievously withheld by ED. It was also submitted that even prior to disbursal of the loan amount in question, construction was commenced with the funds of the promoters.

It was submitted that there is no siphoning or misappropriation of loan amount and the amount alleged to be siphoned off was in fact the money that was paid back by AHPL under the instructions of the turnkey contractor to the persons who supplied material and rendered services to AHPL before disbursal of the said loan.

Advocate Tanveer Ahmad Mir also represented businessman RajSingh Gehlot argued that the accused is an old and ailing man with firm roots in the society and he is neither a flight risk nor in a position to tamper with the evidence nor influences the witnesses and he deserves to be admitted on bail.

Last year, the ED had initiated an investigation under PMLA on the basis of an FIR registered by State ACB, Jammu against Aman Hospitality Pvt Ltd (AHPL) and its Directors for money laundering in the construction and development of the 5-star ‘Leela Ambience Convention Hotel’ situated near the Yamuna Sports Complex in Delhi, the investigation agency said.

It stated that investigation under PMLA revealed that a huge part of a loan amount of more than Rs 800 crore, which was sanctioned by a consortium of banks for the hotel project, was siphoned off by AHPL and Raj Singh Gehlot and his associates through a web of companies controlled by them.

A month after Enforcement Directorate arrested Raj Singh Gehlot, owner of Ambience Mall in Gurugram, on money laundering charges, Central Bureau of Investigation has booked him and two other directors of his firm for allegedly siphoning off Rs 289 crore from J&K Bank.

The ED arrested Gehlot last month in an alleged bank loan fraud case worth more than Rs 800 crore. He was arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for committing bank fraud against the Jammu and Kashmir Bank Consortium.

KMC’s Zonal Officer Rajesh Kumar Gupta told PTI that the shopping mall was sealed for not paying the civic body’s dues of Rs 13,36,24,712 that comprises property tax of Rs 10,44,88,848 and the interest of Rs 2,91,35,864.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

RBI extends curbs on UP-based People’s Co-operative Bank, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai, The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has extended restrictions on People’s Co-operative Bank Limited, Kanpur, for a further period of three months from September 11 to December 10.

The bank has been under restrictions since June 10, 2020, through the directives issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS).

“The validity of the directive, which was last extended up to September 10, 2021 has further been extended for a period of three months from September 11, 2021 to December 10, 2021 vide directive DOR.MON.D-35/12.28.059/2021-22 dated September 8, 2021 subject to review,” said an RBI statement on Saturday.

Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 gives the central bank power to give directions to banks and can take action, to prevent the affairs of any banking company being conducted in a manner detrimental to the interests of the depositors or in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the banking company.

As per the directives, the Kanpur-based co-operative bank has been barred from granting fresh loans and accepting deposits for six months without prior approval of the RBI, due to its weak financial position.

“In particular, no amount of the total balance across all savings bank or current account or any other account of a depositor may be allowed to be withdrawn,” the RBI had said in its statement on June 11, 2020, when it had imposed the restrictions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CBIC Extends Due Dates To File These GST Forms: Check Report

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Taxes

oi-Vipul Das

|

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has extended due dates to file several Goods and Services Tax (GST) forms. The government has earlier given taxpayers solace by lowering or eliminating the late penalty for non-filing FORM GSTR-3B for tax periods from July 2017 to April 2021 if the returns were filed between June 1, 2021 and August 31, 2021. The deadline to apply for the late fee amnesty scheme has now been extended from August 31, 2021 to November 30, 2021, according to the statement issued by CBIC.

CBIC Extends Due Dates To File These GST Forms: Check Report

“Based on the multiple representations received, Government has also extended the timelines for filing of application for revocation of cancellation of registration to 30.09.2021, where the due date of filing of application for revocation of cancellation of registration falls between 01.03.2020 to 31.08.2021. The extension would be applicable only in those cases where registrations have been cancelled under clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 29 of the CGST Act,” reported CBIC.

For the period of 27.04.2021 to 31.08.2021, companies can file FORM GSTR-3B and FORM GSTR-1/ IFF utilising an electronic verification code (EVC) instead of a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC). According to CBIC, the deadline for the same has been extended until October 31, 2021.

The above extension of the late fee amnesty scheme’s deadline and the deadline for submitting an application for the abolishment of registration cancellation will benefit a large number of taxpayers, particularly small taxpayers, who were unable to submit their returns within the deadline due to a variety of factors, most notably the COVID-19 pandemic’s dilemmas, due to which registrations were revoked. As a big relief to them, CBIC has mentioned that “taxpayers are requested to avail the benefit of these extensions at the earliest to avoid last minute rush.”

Story first published: Saturday, September 11, 2021, 14:00 [IST]



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Reserve Bank of India, Kanpur invites e-tender for ‘Providing and applying SRI (Solar Reflective Index) paint coating over the terrace of AOB and old Building at RBI, Kanpur.’ The e-tendering shall be done through the e-tendering portal of MSTC Ltd (https://mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi). All eligible and interested companies / agencies / firms must register themselves with MSTC Ltd through the above-mentioned website to participate in the e-tendering process. The Schedule of e-tender is as follows:

E-Tender No. RBI/Kanpur/Estate/104/21-22/ET/143
a) Estimated cost ₹8,64,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Sixty-Four Thousand only) (Including GST @18%)
b) Mode of e-tender e-Procurement System (Online Bid through www.mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi)
c) Type of e-tender Limited (Only for firms empaneled with RBI, Kanpur under more than Rs. 10 Lakh and up to Rs. 50 Lakh category of Civil Works)
d) Date of NIT available to parties to download September 10, 2021 from 07.00 PM
e) Pre-bid meeting (Offline) October 06, 2021 at 10.30 AM
Venue: Estate Department, 2nd Floor, Reserve Bank of India, Mall Road, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh-208001
f) EMD through NEFT Only successful bidder shall deposit only 2% of the contract value.
To be paid through NEFT / Net banking to A/c No. 186003001, IFSC RBIS0KNPA01 (where ‘0’ represents zero)
g) E-Tender Fees NIL
h) Date of Starting of e-tender for submission of on-line Bid at http://mstcecommerce.com/eprochome/rbi October 06, 2021 from 02.00 PM
i) Last date of submission of EMD Within 10 working days after intimation provided by the Bank.
j) Date of closing of online e-tender for submission of Bid October 20, 2021 till 10.00 AM
k) Date & time of opening of online Bid October 20, 2021 from 12.00 PM
l) Validity of the e-tender 90 days from the date of opening of online bid
m) Transaction Fee (Non-refundable) (To be paid separately by the tenderers to MSTC vide MSTC E-Payment Gateway for participating in the e-tender) As charged by MSTC Ltd.

2. Applicants intending to apply will have to satisfy the Bank by furnishing documentary evidence in support of their possessing required eligibility and in the event of their failure to do so, the Bank reserves the right to reject their bids.

3. The Bank is not bound to accept the lowest tender and reserves the right to accept either in full or in part any tender. The Bank also reserves the right to reject any or all the tenders, either in whole or in part, without assigning any reason thereof.

4. Any amendments / corrigendum to the tender, if any, issued in future will only be notified on the RBI Website and MSTC Website as given above and will not be published in the newspaper.

Regional Director
Reserve Bank of India
Kanpur

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has extended the Directions issued to the People’s Co-operative Bank Limited, Kanpur (Uttar Pradesh) for a further period of three months from September 11, 2021 to December 10, 2021, subject to review. The bank has been under directions since June 10, 2020 vide directive DoS.CO.UCBs-North/D-1/12.28.059/2019-20 dated June 09, 2020 issued under Section 35 A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS).

The validity of the directive, which was last extended up to September 10, 2021 has further been extended for a period of three months from September 11, 2021 to December 10, 2021 vide directive DOR.MON.D-35/12.28.059/2021-22 dated September 08, 2021 subject to review. A copy of the directive dated September 08, 2021 is displayed at the bank’s premises for the perusal of public.

(Yogesh Dayal)     
Chief General Manager

Press Release: 2021-2022/847

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

CBDT, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


In order to make disinvestment deals of ailing state-owned firms more attractive for strategic investors, the government on Friday allowed erstwhile public sector companies to carry forward losses to be set off against future profits. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in a clarification said that Section 79 of the Income Tax Act shall not apply to an erstwhile public sector company which has become so as a result of strategic disinvestment.

“Accordingly, loss incurred in any previous year prior to, and including, the previous year of strategic disinvestment shall be carried forward and set off by the erstwhile public sector company,” the CBDT under the Finance Ministry said in a statement

The relaxation, it added, will cease to apply from the previous year in which the company, that was the ultimate holding company of such erstwhile public sector company immediately after completion of the strategic disinvestment, ceases to hold 51 per cent of the voting power of the erstwhile company.

Section 79 of the Income Tax Act deals with carry forward and set off of losses in case of companies.

“In order to facilitate the strategic disinvestment, it has been decided that Section 79 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, shall not apply to an erstwhile public sector company which has become so as a result of strategic disinvestment,” it said.

Necessary legislative amendments for the above decision shall be proposed in due course of time, the statement said.

Commenting on clarification, Nangia Andersen LLP Head (Government and Public Sector Advisory) Suraj Nangia said “the Government has allowed that even after change in shareholding of such ailing PSUs due to transfer of shares in such PSUs by Government to strategic investors, past losses of such PSUs will be allowed to be carried forward for set off against future profits.”

This will make disinvestment deals of ailing PSUs more attractive for strategic investors, he said.

Under normal tax provisions, he said, without this relaxation, past losses of a company are not allowed to be set off, if there is change in majority shareholding of a company (i.e. 51 per cent).

“It may be noted that such relaxation will be available, only till the strategic investor retains at least 51 per cent in the PSU after takeover. In case the strategic investor’s shareholding falls below 51 per cent, such relaxation will be withdrawn,” he added.

The ambitious divestment pipeline also includes loss making national carrier Air India for which the deadline for submission of financial bids is September 15.

The government will be selling budget airline Air India Express and Air India’s 50 per cent stake in Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) besides offloading its entire stake in loss-making Air India.

The deadline for submission of Expressions of Interest (EoI) or preliminary bids was extended five times earlier before closing it in December last year.

Finance Act, 2021 has amended section 72A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 that deals with amalgamation of a public sector company (PSU) which ceases to be a PSU (erstwhile public sector company), as part of strategic disinvestment, with one or more company or companies and carry forward of losses in case of change in shareholding following sale by the government.

The Centre budgeted Rs 1.75 lakh crore from stake sale in public sector companies and financial institutions, including 2 PSU banks and one insurance company, in the current fiscal year.

As part of the privatisation strategy, the government aims to complete the strategic sale of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL), Shipping Corp, Container Corporation, Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd, Pawan Hans, Air India, among others, by March 2022.

So far this financial year, Rs 8,368 crore has been mopped up through minority stake sales in PSUs and the sale of SUUTI (Specified Undertaking of the Unit Trust of India) stake in Axis Bank.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Things should return to normal with economy back on track: Bajaj Allianz General chief Singhel

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited (BAGIC), the country’s largest private general insurer by revenue and profits, sees the company’s overall business operations returning soon to pre-pandemic level with the economy getting back on track, a top official said.

As in previous years, this 20-year old private general insurer is hopeful of outdoing overall industry growth (estimated at 12-15 per cent) even during this fiscal with the recent uptrend in business led by health insurance followed by growth in motor and property insurance, Tapan Singhel, Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, told BusinessLine in an interview.

“I can comfortably say, with no further waves withstanding, things should return to normal with the economy getting back on track. The growth of the economy and insurance industry is directly proportional to each other. Hence the better the Indian economy does, the better the insurance industry does “, he said when asked if business operations had returned to pre-pandemic level..

As of end August this fiscal, BAGIC recorded gross direct premium of ₹ 6468 crore, up 18 per cent over ₹ 5471 crore in same period last fiscal. The overall industry stands at about 14 per cent growth for all general insurance companies.

Singhel also hoped to see government playing an even bigger role in improving the healthcare system in the coming days and noted that a “holistic” approach that covers aspects like need to reduce GST on health insurance ( from current 18 per cent to say 5 per cent) and putting in place a regulator for hospitals was the need of the hour to solve the current problem of absence of an efficient healthcare system in the country.

Asked how had Covid-19 impacted BAGIC’s business, Singhel said that the impact of Covid on general insurance industry was predominantly on health space. BAGIC too felt the heat with loss ratios going up just as it happened for the industry. “Loss ratio for health has not been very good for us and that is for the entire industry. While Covid created awareness and sales of health policies went up, claims also got created. The good part is that the industry supported Covid 19 claims. You must also understand health reinsurance was not available internationally for Covid. Industry settled nearly ₹ 30,000 crore claims on its own internal resources.

Every industry affected by Covid has asked for government relief. Did you hear insurance industry asking for any such relief from the government inspite of paying so much claims?”, Singhel asked.

Singhel asserted that it would not be right to describe 2021-22 as a “bad year” for BAGIC, noting that settling claims was part of the business.

Medical inflation

Asked about customers anxiety over increase in health insurance premiums in the current pandemic times, Singhel asserted that Covid is not the reason why health insurance premiums will go up. “People are not understanding this. There is no regulator for hospitals. Premium increase on health policies is very natural phenomena because of the dichotomy in the system. The problem is you can’t increase health premium for three years. It’s a kind of lock-in. Every premium increase has to go to regulator and IRDAI allows this only once in three years. With average medical inflation of about 12-15 per cent per annum, price rise in premium translates to cover 45 per cent medical inflation over three years. Insurance premiums is locked for three years, while medical bills are moving up every year. Premium increase will have to happen to match the previous inflation”, he said.

Singhel said that General insurance industry had already approached the insurance regulator seeking yearly adjustments to insurance premiums rather than once in three years.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

This Large Private Sector Bank Still Offers Interest Rates of 6% On Fixed Deposits

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Let’s take a quick look at the interest rate being offered by IndusInd Bank

Tenure Regular Senior citizens
61 days to 90 days 3.40% 3.90%
270 days to 354 days 5.50% 6.00%
1 Year to below 1 Year 6 Months 6.00% 6.50%
1 Year 6 Months to below 1 Year 7 Months 6.00% 6.50%
1 Year 7 Months to below 2 Years 6.00% 6.50%
2 years to below 2 years 6 Months 6.00% 6.50%
Above 3 years upto 61 months 6.00% 6.50%

Our take on fixed deposits

Our take on fixed deposits

The deposits look good in terms of interest rates for a period of 1-2 years. Investing for the longer term may not be so prudent and we tell you later, why it could be the case. We believe that interest rates on fixed deposits could remain the same or trend marginally higher in the next few quarters or so. It is likely that inflation risks to the economy remain and at some stage repo rates or interest rates at which the RBI lends to banks could be hiked. If that happens banks would be forced to align their interest rates accordingly. Also, as economic momentum gathers steam, credit offtake could be higher leading to a slight increase in interest rates. It may take a few quarters more, but, we believe that interest rates are unlikely to fall lower. We therefore suggest that do not go for Fds with long term tenure like 5-years. If you go for long term and if interest rates rise, you are trapped, because to break the deposit and open a new deposit would mean you would have to incur breaking charges of 1%.

Are fixed deposits secure?

Are fixed deposits secure?

We have not heard of any private sector bank or government owned bank default. Yes, cooperative banks have had their struggles and there were cases of defaults. Having said that private sector bank Yes Bank too had its share of problems when a moratorium was placed on withdrawals, but, eventually deposit holders received their money. Also, a sum of Rs 5 lakhs on deposits is insured with the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation. All in all, we feel that for the short term period of 1 to 2 years, the IndusInd Bank deposits look interesting and one may consider investing in the same.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

3 Stocks With High Debt To Equity Ratio

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Debt ratio

The debt ratio indicates how leveraged a business is. It analyses a company’s assets and liabilities and provides information on the company’s debt situation. It is usually desirable to have a ratio that is less than one. Companies in the capital-intensive sector, on the other hand, may have a smaller ratio. As a result, peer-to-peer comparison may be the best option.

The debt ratio is calculated using the following formula:

Debt ratio = Total debt / Total assets

Here are 3 highly leveraged companies with high debt to equity ratio

Adani Power

Adani Power

In India, Adani Power Limited generates and transmits electricity through long-term power purchase agreements and on a commercial basis. As of March 2021, the company’s total debt was Rs 650,263 m. During the same time period, its net worth was Rs 4,976 million.

The debt to equity (D/E) ratio is 131 when total debt is divided by net worth. The higher the ratio, the more debt a company has in comparison to its equity. An excessively high percentage can cause troubles in your small organisation.

The debt load of Adani’s six companies is quite high, which is also a cause of worry for investors. is. Investors will be watching to see how much debt Gautam Adani can cut in the coming days.

Tata Communications

Tata Communications

As of March 31, 2021, Tata Communication‘s total debt was Rs 99,585 million. During the same time period, the company’s total equity was Rs 1,155 million.

When we divide the entire debt by total equity, we get an 86 D/E ratio.

The profit and cash flow of the Tata group companies improved in the fiscal year 2021. Tata Communications’ debt was $98.1 billion at the end of March 2021, down from $108.1 billion a year earlier. On the other hand, it has $23.2 billion in cash, resulting in a net debt of $74.9 billion.

Cholamandalam Financial Holdings

Cholamandalam Financial Holdings

As of March 31, 2021, Cholamandalam Financial Holdings‘ total debt was Rs 637,972 million. During the same time period, the company’s total equity was Rs 53,859 million. When we divide the entire debt by total equity, we get an 11.8 D/E ratio.

Only 2.7 percent of trading sessions in the last 16 years had intraday gains of more than 5%. The stock returned 13.88 percent over three years, compared to 49.42 percent for the Nifty Midcap 100.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Banks and financial institutions are not included in the above list because they tend to have higher debt levels because they borrow funds to lend. If we do add them, though, the list will become bloated.

Maintaining a low ratio would also indicate that businesses are not making use of the capital they have available for investment. This might make the corporation vulnerable to a leveraged buyout. Varying industries have different debt-to-equity ratios that are considered “safe” or “normal.” When estimating the relevance of the ratio, take into account industry-specific trends.

It’s crucial to figure out what to include in the debt-to-equity equation’s liabilities section. Some businesses choose to integrate short- and long-term debt, while others prefer to assess each separately. This is significant because the ratio does not indicate when debts must be paid on its own. When the bulk of loans are long-term, a high debt-to-equity ratio is less concerning than when debt payments are due soon.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Punjab National Bank’s board approves raising Rs 6,000 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


New Delhi: Punjab National Bank (PNB) on Friday said its board has approved raising up to Rs 6,000 crore by issuing bonds. The decision was taken at the meeting of the board of directors on Friday.

In a regulatory filing, the bank said its board has “approved raising of capital through issue of Basel III additional Tier-1 (AT-1) bonds or Tier II bonds or a combination of both in one or more tranches up to an amount of Rs 6,000 crore”.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 88 89 90 91 92 133