Top 5 Best Mid Cap Equity Dividend Funds To Consider SIP In 2021

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Top 5 Mid Cap Equity Dividend Funds to consider now

Kotak Emerging Equity Scheme

The assets under management of Kotak Emerging Equity Fund Direct-Growth have valued at Rs 15,709 crores (AUM). Kotak Emerging Equity Fund’s NAV for September 14, 2021, is 78.87.

It has returned an average of 21.93 percent per year since its inception.

The scheme invests primarily in mid-cap companies in order to produce long-term capital appreciation via a portfolio of equities and equity-related instruments.

If you invested Rs 5000 every month for three years, you would have received Rs 3.12 Lakh in returns. The amount would have been Rs 37,801 if a lump sum of Rs 20,000 had been invested.

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year Since Inception
72.1% 23.8% 19.44% 21.9%

Sundaram Mid Cap Fund

Sundaram Mid Cap Fund

Sundaram Mid Cap Fund has a total asset value of 6,926 crores under management (AUM). It has returned an average of 18.36% every year since its inception.

The scheme invests in mid-cap stocks with the goal of capital appreciation. The fund defines a’midcap’ stock as one whose market capitalization does not surpass that of the 50th stock listed on the NSE (after sorting the shares in descending order of market capitalization). Sundaram Mid Cap Fund’s NAV for September 14, 2021 is 753.54.

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year Since Inception
60.47% 14.32% 12.84% 18.36%

L&T Midcap Fund

L&T Midcap Fund

L&T Midcap Fund Direct-Growth manages a total of 6,948 crores in assets (AUM). It has returned an average of 21.12% every year since its inception.

To gain financial appreciation by predominantly investing in midcap equities. The Scheme will largely invest in firms whose market capitalization falls between the Nifty Free Float Midcap 100 Index’s highest and lowest constituents.

If you invested Rs 5000 every month for three years, you would have received Rs 2.77 Lakh in returns. The amount would have been Rs 30,944 if a lump sum of Rs 20,000 had been invested.

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year Since Inception
51.83% 15.82% 16.95% 21.12%

Taurus Discovery (Midcap) Fund

Taurus Discovery (Midcap) Fund

Taurus Discovery (Midcap) Fund Direct-Growth manages assets worth $75 million (AUM). Chemicals, Financials, Metals, Technology, and Construction make up the majority of the fund’s holdings.

It has returned an average of 18.28 percent per year since its inception.

The Scheme invests in a portfolio of equities and equity-related instruments, mostly from mid-cap firms, with the goal of achieving long-term financial appreciation.

If you invested Rs 5000 every month for three years, you would have received Rs 2.86 Lakh in returns. The amount would have been Rs 32,412i f a lump sum of Rs 20,000 had been invested.

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year Since Inception
51.89% 17.66% 16.98% 18.28%

SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund

SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund

SBI Magnum MidCap Direct Plan-Growth manages assets of Rs 6,056 crores (AUM). The Construction, Automobile, Engineering, Financial, and Consumer Durables sectors account for the majority of the fund’s holdings.

The 1-year returns on SBI Magnum MidCap Direct Plan-Growth are 74.7 percent. It has returned an average of 20.61 percent every year since its inception.

By investing primarily in a highly-diversified basket of equity equities of Midcap businesses, the scheme intends to provide investors with potential for long-term capital growth as well as the liquidity of an open-ended scheme.

If you invested Rs 5000 every month for three years, you would have received Rs 3.11 Lakh in returns. The amount would have been Rs 35, 801 if a lump sum of Rs 20,000 had been invested.

1-Year 3-Year 5-Year Since Inception
74.72% 21.68% 14.68% 20.61%

How is Dividend Yield calculated in Mutual funds?

How is Dividend Yield calculated in Mutual funds?

The dividend yield is calculated by multiplying the total dividends paid over the term by the stock’s current NAV (Net Asset Value). After that, the outcome is annualized. The gains from mutual fund schemes are used to pay dividends. As a result, whenever a scheme announces a dividend, its NAV decreases accordingly.

The following formula is used to determine the dividend yield ratio: Dividend Yield Ratio is calculated by multiplying the dividend per share by the market value per share. The dividend yield ratio can be calculated simply by taking the amount of dividend per share and dividing it by the market value of each share.

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to buy, sell in securities or other financial instruments. Greynium Information Technologies Pvt Ltd, its subsidiaries, associates and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/or damages arising based on information in this article.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

PFRDA Revises Premature Exit Rules of Atal Pension Yojana: Know All

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Investment

oi-Vipul Das

|

Atal Pension Yojana (APY) is a guaranteed pension scheme of the Government of India. The scheme is mainly beneficial for all citizens of the unorganized sector. The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) administers the plan through banks and the Department of Post. After reaching the age of 60, eligible Indian citizens who enroll and contribute to the scheme are entitled to guaranteed pension benefits. Subscribers to the APY get a guaranteed minimum monthly pension of between Rs. 1000 and Rs. 5000 each month.

PFRDA Revises Premature Exit Rules of Atal Pension Yojana: Know All

Under the scheme, premature exit before the age of 60 is only authorized only in extreme situations, such as the death of a beneficiary or the onset of a life-threatening illness. However, recently PFRDA has revised premature exit rules of APY. According to the circular issued on 3rd September 2021 “The existing mode of premature withdrawal under APY is examined from time to time by PFRDA based on the inputs/suggestions received from various stake holders and the changes are proposed with suitable technological intervention.”

In order to expedite the administration of underlying Subscribers’ exit applications, PFRDA has now implemented Instant Bank Account Verification feature. PFRDA has said that “The following guidelines are issued for facilitating timely transfer of withdrawal amount in the Bank Account of APY Subscribers and also as an additional due diligence to protect their corpus lying in the Permanent Retirement Account Number (PRAN).” At the time of exit, there could be two scenarios, as stated below according to the new guidelines of PFRDA:

A. If the SB account details of Subscribers at the time of onboarding & exit are same

1. APY-SP should incorporate the field indicating the active status of Savings Bank (SB) Account in the revised exit file format provided by CRA which is mandatory w.e.f. Sep 15th, 2021.

2. Further “Instant Bank Account verification by penny drop” shall also be undertaken by CRA to verify the operative status of SB Account as part of enhanced due diligence.

3. The above changes are being implemented to enable the CRA system to process the premature withdrawal requests where the associated SB Account is operative so as to ensure receipt of APY account closure proceeds in the SB account.

4. If the associated SB Account is closed/dormant, the modified process ensures the preservation of Subscribers’ contribution in the PRAN itself to generate optimum market-based returns.

B. If the SB account details at the time of onboarding & exit are not same, different Account Number of same Bank or the different Bank

1. APY SPs are advised that the APY closure proceeds are credited to the same Bank Account number and may accept the request with a different Account number or account of a different Bank only as an exception. Such requests are to be accompanied by proof of Alternate Account Number acceptable to the Bank.

2. “Instant Bank Account verification by penny drop” shall be undertaken by CRA as part of enhanced due diligence including the name matching between PRAN and Bank Account Number.

3. The exit requests with mismatches or with unsuccessful account verification, post penny drop is to be confirmed by the respective APY-SP for further processing of exit requests by CRA.

4. APY Subscribers are to be educated by APY-SP to keep their respective Bank account active when they submit their premature withdrawal request, till their request for a premature withdrawal request is processed. A suitable undertaking can be obtained from the Subscriber as part of the withdrawal request.

5. The applicable charges for Instant Bank Account verification would be recovered by CRA from the respective PRAN for further reimbursement to the service provider. The prevailing charges for verifying Bank Account Number through penny drop is Rs. 2.40/- and tax.

Source: PFRDA

Story first published: Wednesday, September 15, 2021, 10:10 [IST]



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

MFIN, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The microfinance industry’s gross loan portfolio (GLP) rose 4.2 per cent to Rs 2,37,369 crore as of June 30, 2021, compared with Rs 2,27,727 crore as of June 30, 2020, according to a report by Microfinance Institutions Network (MFIN). Microfinance loan disbursals during the first quarter of the financial year 2021-22 improved significantly to Rs 25,503 crore, compared with Rs 6,186 crore in the corresponding quarter last year.

MFIN is an industry association comprising 58 NBFC-MFIs and 39 associates including banks, small finance banks (SFBs) and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).

It released the Micrometer report for the April-June 2021 quarter on Tuesday.

The report showed that 13 banks hold the largest share of the portfolio in micro-credit with a total loan outstanding of Rs 1,02,405 crore, which is 43.14 per cent of the total micro-credit universe.

NBFC-MFIs are the second-largest provider of micro-credit with a loan amount outstanding of Rs 75,021 crore, accounting for 31.61 per cent of the total industry portfolio.

SFBs have a total loan amount outstanding of Rs 38,624 crore with a total share of 16.27 per cent. NBFCs account for another 7.89 per cent, and other MFIs account for 1.09 per cent of the universe, it said.

As of June 30, 2021, the microfinance industry served 5.68 crore unique borrowers, through 10.30 crore loan accounts, the report showed.

The microfinance active loan accounts decreased by 0.67 per cent during the past 12 months to 10.30 crore as of June 30, 2021, it said.

The report said the gross loan portfolio (GLP) of NBFC-MFIs stood at Rs 76,237 crore as of June 30, 2021, a 6.9 per cent year-on-year rise as compared to Rs 71,301 crore as of June 30, 2020.

Loan amount of Rs 6,511 crore was disbursed in Q1 FY 2021-22 by NBFC-MFIs through 17.97 lakh accounts, compared with Rs 561 crore disbursed in Q1 FY 2020-21 through 1.99 lakh accounts.

NBFC-MFIs received a total of Rs 3,596 crore in debt funding during the April-June quarter of this fiscal, which is 39.6 per cent lower than that in the year-ago period.

Total equity of the NBFC-MFIs grew 11.9 per cent year-on-year to Rs 18,660 crore as of June 30, 2021. PTI HV HRS hrs



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of England urges banks to wait out EU pressure over euro clearing, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Banks should hold their nerve in the face of European Union pressure to shift euro derivatives clearing from London to the bloc, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said on Tuesday.

Since Britain fully left the EU last December, the bloc has asked banks to move euro clearing from London, which accounts for the bulk of activity, to Frankfurt.

So far, banks and their customers have put on a united front against relocating clearing, saying it would bump up costs by splitting markets.

Bailey said banks were waiting rather than shifting euro positions as a June 2022 deadline looms when temporary permission for London clearers to serve EU customers ends.

“The right thing to do is to wait for the moment. The cost of moving and fragmenting are too large,” Bailey told a Bloomberg event.

“While waiting is sensible from the point of view of the banks, it puts the responsibility on the authorities to sort the thing out,” Bailey said.

However, negotiations with the EU at the present time have not been particularly intense, but the BoE was happy to give EU regulators the assurances they need, he said.

“If they want to take a decision to break the system up, then it’s important to consider the risks to financial stability that come with fragmentation.”

Clearers in the United States already have EU permission to serve customers in the bloc.

“We could see some clearing of euro instruments switch to New York from London if this does not get sorted out,” NatWest bank chairman Howard Davies told the same event.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

IDFC’s reverse merger with bank faces hurdles, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Mumbai: IDFC Ltd, the parent of IDFC Bank, on Tuesday indicated to investors that it faced challenges in pursuing a reverse merger with IDFC First Bank.

According to analyst present in the meeting the management said that the parent company’s holds stake in IDFC Mutual Fund and two ventures one with the Delhi government and one with Karnataka Government would need to be exited and there are challenges in exiting these two firms. Shares of IDFC was down 3%, while shares of IDFC First Bank rose 2% following the analyst meet. Although neither had announced merger plans in the past, the same has often been speculated by analyts. There expectation of the holding company merging into the bank got a boost after the Reserve Bank of India in July clarified that IDFC can exit as the promoter of IDFC First Bank.

The central bank had also allowed small finances banks, which came under a holding company structure to reverse merge with their parent. Following this a couple of SFBs merged with the parent.

For IDFC shareholders the merger with the bank is beneficial considering that there have been reports that the company is selling its mutual fund arm. If post-sale the proceeds are distributed to shareholders it would be very tax inefficient as IDFC would be paying capital gains as well as dividend distribution tax. In the event of a merger the sale proceeds need not be distributed but can be infused into the bank as capital. As the bank’s equity is trading at higher multiples compared to the parent there is an upside for IDFC shareholders if there is a merger. However, IDFC First Bank already has enough capital and may not be able to deploy the fund immediately.

During the call IDFC’s non-executive chairman Vinod Rai said that there were challenges in unwinding the complex corporate structure of IDFC. He also said that the corporation had initiated the process of divesting stake in non-core subsidiaries.

Follow and connect with us on , Facebook, Linkedin



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yes Bank, 6 others settle case with Sebi; pay Rs 1.65 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Private sector lender Yes Bank and six persons on Tuesday settled with Sebi a case pertaining to alleged selective disclosure of asset quality, after paying Rs 1.65 crore towards settlement amount.

Apart from the bank, the six persons who settled the case are — Ashish Agrawal, Niranjan Banodkar, Sanjay Nambiar, Devamalya Dey, Rajat Monga and Shivanand Shettigar.

The order comes after the entities approached Sebi to settle the proceedings initiated against them “without admitting or denying the findings of fact and conclusions of law”, through a settlement order. In a settlement order on Tuesday, Sebi said,” the instant adjudication proceedings initiated against applicants vide SCN (show cause notice) dated October 26, 2020 are disposed of”.

The regulator conducted an investigation in the affairs of Yes Bank during February 2019 to ascertain the possible violation of provisions of Sebi Act and PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices).

Pursuant to the investigation, Sebi observed certain violations were allegedly committed by the bank and the six persons and issued show cause notice to them in this regard in October 2020.

In the show cause notice, it was alleged that Yes Bank made a selective disclosure on February 13, 2019, highlighting “nil” divergence which had significant positive impact on the price movement and had not disclosed other issues mentioned in the Risk Assessment Report (RAR) as observed by RBI such as lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas of its functioning.

It was alleged that announcement made by Yes Bank to exchanges were “incomplete as only selective disclosures highlighting nil divergence in bank’s asset classification and provision from RBI norms were disclosed as per the RAR of RBI.”

“However, other lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas as identified in the RAR were not disclosed,” the order noted.

The announcement resulted in misleading the investors as the price of the scrip increased by around 30 per cent and volume of trading the scrip also increased substantially the next trading day i.e. February 14, 2019.

It was alleged that the bank and six persons, who were involved in the decision making process to make the information public, have violated the provisions of PFUTP norms.

The six persons were either a member of the Reputational Risk Management Committee (RRMC) or part of the decision making process in relation to the disclosures made on February 13, 2019. Pending adjudication proceedings, the applicants proposed to settle the proceedings initiated against them and filed settlement applications.

Thereafter, Sebi’s committee recommended that the case may be settled upon payment of Rs 1.65 crore by applicants on jointly and several liability basis and accordingly they remitted the amount. Consequently, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) settled the case.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Yes Bank, 6 others settle case with Sebi; pay Rs 1.65 crore, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


NEW DELHI: Private sector lender Yes Bank and six persons on Tuesday settled with Sebi a case pertaining to alleged selective disclosure of asset quality, after paying Rs 1.65 crore towards settlement amount.

Apart from the bank, the six persons who settled the case are — Ashish Agrawal, Niranjan Banodkar, Sanjay Nambiar, Devamalya Dey, Rajat Monga and Shivanand Shettigar.

The order comes after the entities approached Sebi to settle the proceedings initiated against them “without admitting or denying the findings of fact and conclusions of law”, through a settlement order. In a settlement order on Tuesday, Sebi said,” the instant adjudication proceedings initiated against applicants vide SCN (show cause notice) dated October 26, 2020 are disposed of”.

The regulator conducted an investigation in the affairs of Yes Bank during February 2019 to ascertain the possible violation of provisions of Sebi Act and PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices).

Pursuant to the investigation, Sebi observed certain violations were allegedly committed by the bank and the six persons and issued show cause notice to them in this regard in October 2020.

In the show cause notice, it was alleged that Yes Bank made a selective disclosure on February 13, 2019, highlighting “nil” divergence which had significant positive impact on the price movement and had not disclosed other issues mentioned in the Risk Assessment Report (RAR) as observed by RBI such as lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas of its functioning.

It was alleged that announcement made by Yes Bank to exchanges were “incomplete as only selective disclosures highlighting nil divergence in bank’s asset classification and provision from RBI norms were disclosed as per the RAR of RBI.”

“However, other lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas as identified in the RAR were not disclosed,” the order noted.

The announcement resulted in misleading the investors as the price of the scrip increased by around 30 per cent and volume of trading the scrip also increased substantially the next trading day i.e. February 14, 2019.

It was alleged that the bank and six persons, who were involved in the decision making process to make the information public, have violated the provisions of PFUTP norms.

The six persons were either a member of the Reputational Risk Management Committee (RRMC) or part of the decision making process in relation to the disclosures made on February 13, 2019. Pending adjudication proceedings, the applicants proposed to settle the proceedings initiated against them and filed settlement applications.

Thereafter, Sebi’s committee recommended that the case may be settled upon payment of Rs 1.65 crore by applicants on jointly and several liability basis and accordingly they remitted the amount. Consequently, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) settled the case.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Belfrics to relaunch its cryptocurrency exchange in India, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Belfrics, a Malaysia based blockchain technology firm, is restarting its cryptocurrency exchange in India from October 2021 in a new avatar. The company is going to focus on phygital model and opening 200 centres across India. All these centres will be based on a franchise basis. The company is planning to invest $10 million for cryptocurrency exchange and $5 million for its blockchain (a total of around Rs100 crore) in the Indian market.

“With regards to the spending in India, as of now we have allocated $3 million for the exchange and once the regulatory scenario clears up, we will be increasing this to $10 million,” Praveen Kumar, CEO & Founder, Belfrics Group, said.

Belfrics also runs a cryptocurrency exchange on its proprietary platform.

India operations

Belfrics had started its operations in India in 2015 when the cryptocurrency segment was very new. Later when RBI issued a notification instructing banks not to favour cryptocurrency transactions, Belfrics put a pause button on its crypto business in 2018.

“Though we halted our cryptocurrency business, our blockchain is doing well in India. Our blockchain business is very active,” Kumar said.

Belfrics was recently acquired by Life Clips, a global software solution company, which has operations in Malaysia, Singapore, India, Kenya, Tanzania and other countries.

In its Indian version, Belfrics is also planning to add many other products.

“On the cryptocurrency exchange along with basic services we will also add five other products which are globally very popluar. Such as staking reward, derivative products, lending and borrowing, custody solutions and crypto payments card and loyalty programmes,” Kumar said.

Focus on India’s crypto market

Since the Supreme Court has set aside the RBI’s ruling on cryptocurrency, there is an exponential rise in the segments. More blockchain startups are entering the space.

“We hope sooner or later regulators will look at this segment, with this hope we are reactivating our plans,” Kumar added.

Currently, India has crypto exchanges but most of them are in the online zone. Belfrics is planning to open 22 centres all over the country.

More than one crore people have invested in cryptocurrency in India and the response towards crypto is.

Click here to read more cryptocurrency stories



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

European banks book 20 billion euros, or 14% of their profits, in tax havens annually, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Europe’s biggest banks are booking an average of 20 billion euros ($23.7 billion) in tax havens every year, which is about 14% of their profits, according to a report by report from the EU Tax Observatory.

The report looked into the activities of 36 systemic European banks, headquartered in 11 countries across Europe, that have been subject to mandatory country-by-country reporting on their actions since 2015.

The tax havens looked into include Bahamas, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Gibraltar, Hong Kong, Ireland, Isle of Man, Jersey, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Macao, Malta, Mauritius, Panama and Qatar.

About 25% of the banks’ profits were booked in countries where the effective tax rate was lower than 15%.

“Bank profitability in tax havens is abnormally high: 238,000 euros per employee, as opposed to around 65,000 euros in non-haven countries,” the authors added. “This suggests that the profits booked in tax havens are primarily shifted out of other countries where service production occurs.”

The profits

HSBC booked a mean 58% of its pre-tax profits in tax havens between 2014 and 2020, according to the study, making it the lender funneling the largest percentage of profits into the EUTO’s list of tax havens.

Standard Chartered booked an average of around a third of its pre-tax profits in tax havens, according to the report, while Deutsche Bank, Nord LB and RBS all booked, on average, more than 20% of their pre-tax profits in tax havens between 2014 and 2020.

Bankia BFA, Erste, Nykredit Realkredit, Swedbank and Banco Sabadell booked none of their profits in tax havens during the seven-year sample period.

Curbs needed

Taxes have become a sensitive issue, with cash-strapped governments plugging holes in the economy due to COVID seeking to agree on a common rate for taxing Big Tech, in particular.

Country-by-country reporting to shed light on the inner workings of banks has failed to change behaviour despite the rise of tax issues on the public agenda, the report said.

“More ambitious initiatives — such as a global minimum tax with a 25% rate — may be necessary to curb the use of tax havens by the banking sector.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

UPI to be linked to Singapore’s PayNow by July 2022

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The platform has seen over 4.9 million registrations, as on January 3, according to the Association of Banks in Singapore.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday said it is working on a project with the Monetary Authority of Singapore to link the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) with the city-state’s fast payments system PayNow. The linkage is targeted to be operational by July 2022.

The linkage will enable users of each payment system to make instant, low-cost fund transfers on a reciprocal basis without getting on board the other system, the Indian central bank said.

“The UPI-PayNow linkage is a significant milestone in the development of infrastructure for cross-border payments between India and Singapore, and closely aligns with the G20’s financial inclusion priorities of driving faster, cheaper and more transparent cross-border payments,” the RBI said.

The linkage builds upon the earlier efforts of NPCI International (NIPL) and Network for Electronic Transfers (NETS) to foster cross-border interoperability of payments using cards and QR codes between India and Singapore. The linkage will further anchor trade, travel and remittance flows between the two countries, the RBI said.

The initiative is also in line with the RBI’s vision of reviewing corridors and charges for inbound cross-border remittances outlined in the Payment Systems Vision Document 2019-21. In that document, released in May 2019, the RBI had observed that the cost of remitting funds is increasingly becoming a key element influencing the size of remittances.

“High cost of remittance made through formal channels may drive customers to informal channels, which are less secure and prone to misuse,” it had said in the document, adding that it would examine the role that payment services providers can play to ensure friction-free remittances at lower cost.

UPI is India’s mobile-based payment system that facilitates customers to make round-the-clock payments instantly and directly from their bank accounts using a virtual payment address (VPA) created by the customer. In August, UPI clocked over 3.5 billion transactions worth Rs 6.39 lakh crore.

PayNow is the fast payment system of Singapore which enables peer-to-peer funds transfer service, available to retail customers through participating banks and non-bank financial institutions in Singapore. It enables users to send and receive instant funds from one bank or e-wallet account to another in Singapore by using just their mobile number, Singapore NRIC/FIN or VPA. The platform has seen over 4.9 million registrations, as on January 3, according to the Association of Banks in Singapore.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 73 74 75 76 77 133