10-year G-Sec auction sees devolvement

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Government securities (G-Secs) prices rose on Friday despite the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) devolving the 10-year benchmark G-Sec on primary dealers (PDs) at the weekly auction.

Market participants attributed this to the aforementioned security being among the six G-Secs RBI will be buying under the third tranche of open market purchase of G-Secs under the G-Sec Acquisition Programme (G-SAP 1.0).

Though the cut-off price at the auction of the 10-year G-Sec came in at ₹98.97 — about 19 paise higher than previous closing price (of ₹98.7850) — bond dealers say many of the bids would have been below Thursday’s closing price, leading to devolvement of the paper PDs.

PDs, who underwrite G-Sec auctions, had to pick up ₹9975.763 crore worth of this paper out of the total notified amount of ₹14,000 crore.

Marzban Irani, CIO-Fixed Income, LIC Mutual Fund, said the central bank has kept the yield on the 10-year on a tight leash in view of the large Government borrowing programme amid the Covid-19 pandemic, while the market players want it to leave the yields to market forces.

Keeping yields in check

Irani observed that G-Sec prices did not fall despite devolvement of the 10-year G-Sec on PDs as market participants know that RBI will buy this security through G-SAP.

In the secondary market, the benchmark 10-year G-Sec coupon rate: 5.85 per cent) rose 9 paise to close at ₹98.875 (previous close ₹98.785), with the yield declining about a basis point to 6.0072 per cent (6.0199 per cent).

Bond yield and price are inversely related and move in opposite directions.

The auction of the other two G-Secs — 4.26 per cent GS 2023 and 6.76 per cent GS 2061 — sailed through.

Under G-SAP, RBI commits upfront to a specific amount of open market purchases of G-Secs with a view to enabling a stable and orderly evolution of the yield curve amidst comfortable liquidity conditions. According to State Bank of India’s economic research report “Ecowrap”, the G-SAP programme of the RBI has been largely successful in keeping the bond yields in check.

However, to make the impact more meaningful, RBI may consider shifting the focus on 7-8 year papers while announcing Open Market Operation/ G-SAP, etc., it added.

“This will smoothen the curve and also reduce upward pressure on benchmark yield. Additionally, RBI can also come up with a prior calendar of bucket-wise maturity for GSAP-2.0,” Soumya Kanti Ghosh, Group Chief Economic Adviser, SBI, said.

Furthermore, more purchases might be done in illiquid securities compared to liquid securities in each bucket. Accordingly, banks will be able to offload their HTM (held-to-maturity) stocks and buy liquid ones.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


1. Reserve Bank of India – Liabilities and Assets*
(₹ Crore)
Item 2020 2021 Variation
Jun. 5 May 28 Jun. 4 Week Year
1 2 3 4 5
4 Loans and Advances          
4.1 Central Government
4.2 State Governments 8806 6473 11235 4762 2429
* Data are provisional.

2. Foreign Exchange Reserves
Item As on June 4, 2021 Variation over
Week End-March 2021 Year
₹ Cr. US$ Mn. ₹ Cr. US$ Mn. ₹ Cr. US$ Mn. ₹ Cr. US$ Mn.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Total Reserves 4417018 605008 83554 6842 198066 28024 625005 103305
1.1 Foreign Currency Assets 4094919 560890 84842 7362 170751 24197 590620 97260
1.2 Gold 274540 37604 -1522 -502 26817 3724 30007 5252
1.3 SDRs 11050 1513 75 -1 186 28 149 71
1.4 Reserve Position in the IMF 36510 5000 159 -16 312 75 4229 722
*Difference, if any, is due to rounding off

4. Scheduled Commercial Banks – Business in India
(₹ Crore)
Item Outstanding as on May. 21, 2021 Variation over
Fortnight Financial year so far Year-on-year
2020-21 2021-22 2020 2021
1 2 3 4 5 6
2 Liabilities to Others            
2.1 Aggregate Deposits 15166808 -50058 262423 53280 1330357 1336894
2.1a Growth (Per cent)   –0.3 1.9 0.4 10.6 9.7
2.1.1 Demand 1694752 -25017 -172096 -166457 131818 249845
2.1.2 Time 13472056 -25041 434519 219737 1198539 1087049
2.2 Borrowings 244661 5773 -18650 636 -67020 -46128
2.3 Other Demand and Time Liabilities 563200 -14704 -84761 -93414 34521 44285
7 Bank Credit 10833589 -36399 -148108 -115923 601208 610835
7.1a Growth (Per cent)   –0.3 –1.4 –1.1 6.2 6.0
7a.1 Food Credit 90663 5569 27652 29409 13694 11247
7a.2 Non-food credit 10742926 -41968 -175760 -145332 587514 599589

6. Money Stock: Components and Sources
(₹ Crore)
Item Outstanding as on Variation over
2021 Fortnight Financial Year so far Year-on-Year
2020-21 2021-22 2020 2021
Mar. 26 May 21 Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
M3 18773142 18933423 -27806 -0.1 430945 2.6 160281 0.9 1809831 11.7 1702515 9.9
1 Components (1.1.+1.2+1.3+1.4)                        
1.1 Currency with the Public 2757847 2862466 23145 0.8 163038 6.9 104618 3.8 395420 18.7 349679 13.9
1.2 Demand Deposits with Banks 1984261 1819170 -24360 -1.3 -172942 -10.0 -165091 –8.3 136998 9.6 254420 16.3
1.3 Time Deposits with Banks 13983686 14203336 -26147 -0.2 437828 3.5 219650 1.6 1264337 10.7 1091492 8.3
1.4 ‘Other’ Deposits with Reserve Bank 47347 48451 -445 -0.9 3021 7.8 1104 2.3 13076 46.0 6923 16.7
2 Sources (2.1+2.2+2.3+2.4-2.5)                        
2.1 Net Bank Credit to Government 5692569 5823113 -148360 -2.5 591230 11.9 130543 2.3 947185 20.6 271520 4.9
2.1.1 Reserve Bank 982063 1025199 -128203   273808   43136   386791   -240801  
2.1.2 Other Banks 4710506 4797914 -20157 -0.4 317422 8.0 87407 1.9 560394 15.0 512322 12.0
2.2 Bank Credit to Commercial Sector 11610050 11486691 -41912 -0.4 -164204 -1.5 -123360 –1.1 644781 6.3 612250 5.6
2.2.1 Reserve Bank 8524 1435 -4542   -7486   -7089   -3565   -4245  
2.2.2 Other Banks 11601526 11485256 -37370 -0.3 -156718 -1.4 -116270 –1.0 648346 6.3 616495 5.7

8. Liquidity Operations by RBI
(₹ Crore)
Date Liquidity Adjustment Facility MSF* Standing Liquidity Facilities Market Stabili sation Sche me OMO (Outright) Long Term Repo Opera tions
&
Targeted Long Term Repo Opera tions# Special Long- Term Repo Operations for Small Finance Banks Special Reverse Repo£ Net Injection (+)/
Absorption (-)
(1+3+5+6 +9+10+11+12-2-4-7-8-13)
Repo Reverse Repo* Variable Rate Repo Variable Rate Reverse Repo Sale Purchase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
May 31, 2021 359149 0 795 -358354
Jun. 1, 2021 402563 0 500 -402063
Jun. 2, 2021 404497 0 -404497
Jun. 3, 2021 406786 209 290 -406287
Jun. 4, 2021 358822 200029 0 620 150 -558381
Jun. 5, 2021 35574 1021 -34553
Jun. 6, 2021 999 38 -961
* Includes additional Reverse Repo and additional MSF operations (for the period December 16, 2019 to February 13, 2020)
# Includes Targeted Long Term Repo Operations (TLTRO) and Targeted Long Term Repo Operations 2.0 (TLTRO 2.0) and On Tap Targeted Long Term Repo Operations. Negative (-) sign indicates repayments done by Banks.
& Negative (-) sign indicates repayments done by Banks.
£ As per the Press Release: 2021-2022/177 dated May 07, 2021, as an additional incentive Banks are eligible to park their surplus liquidity up to the size of the COVID loan book under a special 14-day reverse repo window to be conducted on each reporting Friday at a rate which is 25 bps lower than the repo rate.

The above information can be accessed on Internet at https://wss.rbi.org.in/

The concepts and methodologies for WSS are available in Handbook on WSS (https://rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=15762).

Time series data are available at https://dbie.rbi.org.in

Ajit Prasad
Director   

Press Release: 2021-2022/354

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Tenders

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The tender for the captioned work was invited on June 03, 2021 and the last date of submission of the tender was kept June 24, 2021.

2. In connection to the above, we are arranging a pre-bid meeting on June 17, 2021 at 11.30 AM on 5th Floor, Main Office Building, Reserve Bank of India, Near Gandhi Bridge, Ahmedabad, Gujarat – 380014.

3. All concerned may please take note of the above.

4. The Corrigendum and minutes of Pre-bid meeting shall form part of the Tender Documents. Duly signed and stamped copies of the same have to be uploaded by the bidders along with the Tender. Any bid received without sign and stamp is liable to be rejected.

Regional Director
Reserve Bank of India
Ahmedabad Regional Office

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Annual Report

[ad_1]

Read More/Less




April 14, 2015




Dear All




Welcome to the refurbished site of the Reserve Bank of India.





The two most important features of the site are: One, in addition to the default site, the refurbished site also has all the information bifurcated functionwise; two, a much improved search – well, at least we think so but you be the judge.




With this makeover, we also take a small step into social media. We will now use Twitter (albeit one way) to send out alerts on the announcements we make and YouTube to place in public domain our press conferences, interviews of our top management, events, such as, town halls and of course, some films aimed at consumer literacy.




The site can be accessed through most browsers and devices; it also meets accessibility standards.



Please save the url of the refurbished site in your favourites as we will give up the existing site shortly and register or re-register yourselves for receiving RSS feeds for uninterrupted alerts from the Reserve Bank.



Do feel free to give us your feedback by clicking on the feedback button on the right hand corner of the refurbished site.



Thank you for your continued support.




Department of Communication

Reserve Bank of India


Next

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Reserve Bank of India – Press Releases

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


The results of the auctions of 4.26% Government Stock 2023 (Re-Issue), 5.85% Government Stock 2030 (Re-Issue), 6.76% Government Stock 2061 (Re-Issue) held on June 11, 2021 are:

Auction Results 4.26 GS 2023* 5.85% GS 2030 6.76% GS 2061
I. Notified Amount ₹3000 Crore ₹14000 Crore ₹9000 Crore
II. Underwriting Notified Amount ₹3000 Crore ₹14000 Crore ₹9000 Crore
III. Competitive Bids Received      
(i) Number 147 291 250
(ii) Amount ₹16659.118 Crore ₹39125 Crore ₹25662 Crore
IV. Cut-off price / Yield 100.12 98.97 97.27
(YTM: 4.1929%) (YTM: 5.9938%) (YTM: 6.9625%)
V. Competitive Bids Accepted      
(i) Number 18 4 78
(ii) Amount ₹3747.823 Crore ₹4000 Crore ₹8990.879 Crore
VI. Partial Allotment Percentage of Competitive Bids 76.26%
(6 Bids)
0%
(0 Bids)
31.10%
(2 Bids)
VII. Weighted Average Price/Yield 100.14 98.99 97.34
(WAY: 4.1820%) (WAY: 5.9910%) (WAY: 6.9572%)
VIII. Non-Competitive Bids Received      
(i) Number 3 6 6
(ii) Amount ₹2.177 Crore ₹24.237 Crore ₹9.121 Crore
IX. Non-Competitive Bids Accepted      
(i) Number 3 6 6
(ii) Amount ₹2.177 Crore ₹24.237 Crore ₹9.121 Crore
(iii) Partial Allotment Percentage 100% (0 Bids) 100% (0 Bids) 100% (0 Bids)
X. Amount of Underwriting accepted from primary dealers ₹3000 Crore ₹14000 Crore ₹9000 Crore
XI. Devolvement on Primary Dealers 0 ₹9975.763 Crore 0
* Greenshoe amount of ₹750 crore has been accepted

Ajit Prasad
Director   

Press Release: 2021-2022/353

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bank of Maharashtra tops PSU banks in terms of loan, deposit growth

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


State-owned Bank of Maharashtra (BoM) has emerged as the top performer among public sector lenders in terms of loan and deposit growth during financial year 2020-21.

The lender recorded 13.45 per cent increase in gross advances at ₹1.07 lakh crore in 2020-21, as per the published data of BoM.

It was followed by Punjab & Sind Bank which posted 8.39 per cent growth in advances with aggregate loans at ₹67,811 crore at the end of March 2021.

When it came to deposit mobilisation, BoM with nearly 16 per cent growth was ahead of even the country’s largest lender State Bank of India, which recorded 13.56 per cent rise.

However, in absolute terms SBI’s deposit base was 21 times higher at ₹36.81 lakh crore as against ₹1.74 lakh crore of BoM.

Current Account Savings Account (CASA) for BoM saw 24.47 per cent rise, the highest among the public sector lenders, during the year.

As a result, CASA was 54 per cent or ₹93,945 crore of the total liability of the bank.

According to the announced quarterly numbers, Central Bank of India achieved second spot by recording 11.46 per cent growth in CASA at ₹1.61 lakh crore.

Total business of BoM increased 14.98 per cent to ₹2.81 lakh crore.

For the full year 2020-21, BoM’s standalone net profit jumped nearly 42 per cent to ₹550.25 crore. In the previous year, the profit was ₹388.58 crore.

The bank’s asset quality improved significantly as the gross bad loans or gross Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) dipped to 7.23 per cent of gross advances by the end of March 2021 as against 12.81 per cent by the same period of 2020.

In absolute terms, gross bad loans stood at ₹7,779.68 crore at the end of March 2021, lower than ₹12,152.15 crore recorded in the year-ago period.

Net NPAs came down to 2.48 per cent (₹2,544.32 crore) from 4.77 per cent (₹4,145.38 crore).

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Policybazaar gets insurance broking licence from IRDAI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


 

Web-aggregator Policybazaar on Friday said it has got approval from regulator IRDAI to undertake insurance broking, a development that will help the company augment business and expand bouquet of services.

With this development, the company will surrender its web-aggregator licence to Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) and undertake business including insurance aggregation under the broking umbrella.

“We received our licence to be a broker for which we have been in touch with the regulator for the last three years,” PolicyBazaar.com CEO Yashish Dahiya told PTI.

Venturing into new segments

The broking licence will allow the company to venture into segments which it could not do in the past like claims assistance, offline services, and establish Points of Presence network.

From a revenue perspective, he said, “as a web aggregator we were not paid for life insurance renewals.” As a broker, he said, the company will be entitled for commission as well as fee for web aggregation.

Also read: Serum Institute of India picks up stake in PolicyBazaar

With the help of broking licence, he said, “we will be able to do claims settlement and many other things and we will use this opportunity very wisely.” Policybazaar has a market share of 25 per cent in the life insurance segment while 10 per cent in health insurance.

The parent company PB Fintech also promotes Paisabazaar.com, which is an online credit comparison portal.

PB Fintech had attained the status of a unicorn in 2018 when it raised $200 million in a Series-F round led by Japan’s SoftBank. A company valued at over $1 billion is called a unicorn.

Other investors include the likes of Info Edge, Premji Invest, Temasek, Ribbit Capital, Chiratae, Inventus Capital Partners, True North, Tiger Global, Wellington and Steadview.

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Axis Mutual Fund Launches ‘Axis Quant Fund’, Should You Invest?

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Features of Axis Quant Fund

The scheme’s benchmark would be the S&P BSE 200 TRI, with a minimum investment amount of Rs 5,000 and subsequent investments in multiples of Rs 1. The scheme’s specifics are as follows.

  • The fund employs a fundamental data-driven bottom-up approach stock selection strategy that is backed with a systematic investment method. The fund’s goal is to build a portfolio of 40-60 stocks by selecting equities using quantitative criteria and rebalancing the portfolio regularly.
  • The fund will choose stocks based on core metrics such as growth, value, momentum, and quality, which will be screened using rule-based standards.
  • The fund will distribute 80-100 per cent of its assets to equity and equity-related instruments of identified firms using a quantitative methodology, 0-20 per cent to other equity and equity-related securities, 0-20 per cent to debt and money market instruments, and 0-10 per cent to REIT and InvIT units.
  • With a 5-year investment horizon, the product is appropriate for investors seeking long-term wealth gain.
  • This fund can be purchased through Axis Mutual Fund Online, Axis Mutual Fund Mobile App, Mutual Fund Utility, Channel Distributors, Stock Exchange Channels, and other Online Mode or Mutual Fund Investment apps.
  • Investors interested in SIPs can begin with a minimum SIP of Rs. 1,000/- and in multiples of Rs. 1/- every month. There is no upper limit to invest during or after the NFO period. For further purchases on an ongoing basis, the minimum amount would be Rs. 100 and in multiples of Rs. 1/- thereafter.
  • During the NFO period and thereafter, the minimum initial investment for purchase/switch-in would be Rs. 5,000, and in multiples of Rs 1.
  • The scheme, according to the fund house, would strive to develop an all seasons portfolio that includes the best of fundamental styles: quality, growth, and valuation. The scheme will enable the fund manager to build a portfolio that balances risk and return goals. The scheme also seeks to choose a portfolio of high-quality stocks with outstanding upside potential but low pricing.
  • The fund will have a diverse portfolio spanning sectors and market size.
  • The NFO will be open from June 11 till June 25.

Exit Load and Fund Managers

Exit Load and Fund Managers

Deepak Agrawal and Hitesh Das will manage the fund. Mr Deepak Agrawal is an Equity Research Analyst with over 15 years of experience in the financial markets. Mr Hitesh Das, on the other hand, has over 9 years of expertise in financial markets. If the investment is redeemed or transferred after 12 months from the date of allocation, there will be no exit load. However, if the investment is redeemed or transferred within 12 months, there will be no exit load on the first 10% of the investment and a 1% exit load on the outstanding investment.

Should you invest?

Should you invest?

Returns from rules-based strategies are mostly influenced by disclosure to equity risk variables, particularly price, volatility, quality, and numerous others. Rules-based approaches are particularly appealing to investors who have price limitations, an intolerance to huge risk in concentrated portfolios, or a wish to minimise market vulnerability over the long term with low-volatility assets. A concentrated portfolio includes a few different assets to achieve a certain degree of diversity. A concentrated portfolio may raise your risk, but it also increases your return. On the other side, a fund house uses an NFO to generate funds from the investors in order to acquire market instruments such as equity shares, bonds, and so on. NFOs, like stock market IPOs, are meant to raise funds for the instrument or scheme to engage new and more investors. Historically, NFO investors have seen considerable raise upon listing because investors can purchase these funds at the fund’s existing net asset value (NAV) after the expiry of the NFO period. A new mutual fund or new fund offer may undoubtedly allow you to diversify your portfolio, but on the other hand, an NFO has no past history of performance or loss, which is a significant risk. So, before investing in an NFO, we recommend that investors should look at the AMC’s track record, the purchase price, and the fund’s terms and conditions.



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Addendum – Expression of Interest – Consultant for Manpower Assessment/Planning

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


Please refer to the advertisement dated May 11, 2021 regarding submission of EOI for engagement of External Consultant to undertake Manpower Assessment/Planning exercise for the Department of Supervision. In this connection, it may be noted that the EOI documents received till 12pm on June 15, 2021 shall be opened on June 17, 2021 at 11am at RBI, WTC, 3rd Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai. Due to situation of pandemic, physical presence of outsiders is being avoided in line with Government guidelines. Consultants desirous of attending the EOI opening process through virtual mode may send in a request at the following email id – tagmpe@rbi.org.in. All other terms and conditions mentioned in the EOI remain unchanged.

Chief General Manager-in-Charge
Department of Supervision, Central Office

Mumbai

[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

Bitcoin ruling roils crypto world seeking regulatory clarity, BFSI News, ET BFSI

[ad_1]

Read More/Less


By Vildana Hajric and Yakob Peterseil

International banking regulators’ decision to classify Bitcoin as the riskiest of assets dragged cryptocurrencies further into the mainstream financial world.

It also made it extremely costly for banks to hold digital tokens on their balance sheets, potentially delaying crypto’s wider adoption.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision proposed that a 1,250 per cent risk weight be applied to a bank’s exposure to Bitcoin and certain other cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin jumped on the announcement, then erased the gains. It was trading around $36,200 as of 10:30 a.m. in Hong Kong on Friday.

“The only consistency has been the volatility — it’s been big spikes, tons of enthusiasm, followed by big selloffs,” Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co., said of Bitcoin’s moves. “If you believe in it you’re probably to stomach the volatility, but if you’re just in it because it seems like the hot way to get a quick buck, that volatility is going to be hard to deal with.”

The ruling sparked a bevy of reactions across Wall Street and other financial centers worldwide. Here’s a sampling:

Luke Sully, CEO at treasury technology specialist Ledgermatic:
“It’s a piece of news that both advocates and critics of Bitcoin will declare as a win. It demonstrates that Bitcoin is now a recognized asset class with risk management parameters for the banks, but these same parameters could be a potential deterrent given the onerous capital requirements that may make it an unpalatable business,” he said. “There are a few underlying assumptions in this risk weighting, the most obvious being that the price may go to zero and investors could lose their full allocation. The capital requirements don’t protect the banks clients from transaction, settlement and FX volatility either.”

David Tawil, president of ProChain Capital, a crypto hedge fund:
To me, this whole thing, along with the IMF, is just a way for those entities to get involved in the conversation. In terms of putting these requirements it’s going to go ahead, and at least for now, take traditional banks that are traditional regulated by these regulatory entities essentially out of this game and that will allow for more and more alternative players, who are not regulated, to go ahead and to pull further ahead,” he said. “A regulator has very little upside and enormous downside — it’s like being a policeman. You want to protect people. So the furthest you can go in terms of lodging measures that stop activity, the better. And so, I think that they are for the first time inserting themselves. This certainly does not mean the end of cryptocurrency, the end of Bitcoin.”

Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Global Forex:
“I don’t think these things are good or bad themselves — it depends on what the objective is,” he said. “It’s not decentralized, it’s highly concentrated. Crypto was born in an age in which we had very extreme disparities of wealth and income — how can it not reflect that? The bulk of Bitcoin that’s owned by wallets have more than 100 Bitcoins, that’s more than $300,000 — how many Americans have $300,000 to put into crypto as opposed to retirement money?”

Matt Maley, chief market strategist for Miller Tabak + Co.:
“Obviously tougher capital requirements cause banks to have more capital on hand — that can have an impact on their earnings. The committee is saying because of risks involved — cryptocurrencies are very volatile — you have to have more capital on hand to protect against declines,” he said. “If it’s going to cost banks more to hold these cryptocurrencies on their books, they’re theoretically going to be less likely to hold the same kind of size as they otherwise would.”

Wells Fargo analyst Mike Mayo said in a Bloomberg TV interview with Matt Miller:
“It is getting hammered, but you know what? It’s getting treated like any other higher-risk asset like subprime loans, or CDOs, or derivatives, or structured products. And it is a new product. It’s untested through economic cycles. It’s untested through liquidity.”



[ad_2]

CLICK HERE TO APPLY

1 65 66 67 68 69 100